Public Environmental Monitoring of the Quality of Water Bodies in Norilsk and Taimyr
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Sources and Pathways 4.1
Chapter 4 Persistant toxic substances (PTS) sources and pathways 4.1. Introduction Chapter 4 4.1. Introduction 4.2. Assessment of distant sources: In general, the human environment is a combination Longrange atmospheric transport of the physical, chemical, biological, social and cultur- Due to the nature of atmospheric circulation, emission al factors that affect human health. It should be recog- sources located within the Northern Hemisphere, par- nized that exposure of humans to PTS can, to certain ticularly those in Europe and Asia, play a dominant extent, be dependant on each of these factors. The pre- role in the contamination of the Arctic. Given the spa- cise role differs depending on the contaminant con- tial distribution of PTS emission sources, and their cerned, however, with respect to human intake, the potential for ‘global’ transport, evaluation of long- chain consisting of ‘source – pathway – biological avail- range atmospheric transport of PTS to the Arctic ability’ applies to all contaminants. Leaving aside the region necessarily involves modeling on the hemi- biological aspect of the problem, this chapter focuses spheric/global scale using a multi-compartment on PTS sources, and their physical transport pathways. approach. To meet these requirements, appropriate modeling tools have been developed. Contaminant sources can be provisionally separated into three categories: Extensive efforts were made in the collection and • Distant sources: Located far from receptor sites in preparation of input data for modeling. This included the Arctic. Contaminants can reach receptor areas the required meteorological and geophysical informa- via air currents, riverine flow, and ocean currents. tion, and data on the physical and chemical properties During their transport, contaminants are affected by of both the selected substances and of their emissions. -
Monitoring Oil Spill in Norilsk, Russia Using Satellite Data Sankaran Rajendran1*, Fadhil N
www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Monitoring oil spill in Norilsk, Russia using satellite data Sankaran Rajendran1*, Fadhil N. Sadooni1, Hamad Al‑Saad Al‑Kuwari1, Anisimov Oleg2, Himanshu Govil3, Sobhi Nasir4 & Ponnumony Vethamony1 This paper studies the oil spill, which occurred in the Norilsk and Taimyr region of Russia due to the collapse of the fuel tank at the power station on May 29, 2020. We monitored the snow, ice, water, vegetation and wetland of the region using data from the Multi‑Spectral Instruments (MSI) of Sentinel‑2 satellite. We analyzed the spectral band absorptions of Sentinel‑2 data acquired before, during and after the incident, developed true and false‑color composites (FCC), decorrelated spectral bands and used the indices, i.e. Snow Water Index (SWI), Normalized Diference Water Index (NDWI) and Normalized Diference Vegetation Index (NDVI). The results of decorrelated spectral bands 3, 8, and 11 of Sentinel‑2 well confrmed the results of SWI, NDWI, NDVI, and FCC images showing the intensive snow and ice melt between May 21 and 31, 2020. We used Sentinel‑2 results, feld photographs, analysis of the 1980–2020 daily air temperature and precipitation data, permafrost observations and modeling to explore the hypothesis that either the long‑term dynamics of the frozen ground, changing climate and environmental factors, or abnormal weather conditions may have caused or contributed to the collapse of the oil tank. Te oil spill detection and tracking through satellite sensors have remarkable advances in utilizing the visible, shortwave to thermal infrared (optical) and the microwave radar bands. Surface identifcation and mapping of an oil spill are essential to evaluate the potential spread and foat from the source to the adjacent areas or endpoints1,2. -
Update on the Clean-Up Following the Accident at a Fuel Storage of Norilsk Nickel October 2020 Disclaimer
Update on the Clean-up Following the Accident at a Fuel Storage of Norilsk Nickel October 2020 Disclaimer The information contained herein has been prepared using information available to PJSC MMC Norilsk Nickel (“Norilsk Nickel” or “Nornickel” or “NN”) at the time of preparation of the presentation. External or other factors may have impacted on the business of Norilsk Nickel and the content of this presentation, since its preparation. In addition all relevant information about Norilsk Nickel may not be included in this presentation. No representation or warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the accuracy, completeness or reliability of the information. Any forward looking information herein has been prepared on the basis of a number of assumptions which may prove to be incorrect. Forward looking statements, by the nature, involve risk and uncertainty and Norilsk Nickel cautions that actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied in such statements. Reference should be made to the most recent Annual Report for a description of major risk factors. There may be other factors, both known and unknown to Norilsk Nickel, which may have an impact on its performance. This presentation should not be relied upon as a recommendation or forecast by Norilsk Nickel. Norilsk Nickel does not undertake an obligation to release any revision to the statements contained in this presentation. The information contained in this presentation shall not be deemed to be any form of commitment on the part of Norilsk Nickel in relation to any matters contained, or referred to, in this presentation. Norilsk Nickel expressly disclaims any liability whatsoever for any loss howsoever arising from or in reliance upon the contents of this presentation. -
Committed to the Green Economy
Committed to the green economy ANNUAL REPORT 2020 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE “ In this unprecedented year, we have remained committed to our vision for a green economy and low-carbon future. A future where innovation creates products for tomorrow, energy is cleaner and where symbiosis drives cost leadership.” Rt Hon Lord Barker of Battle, Executive Chairman For more on sustainability please visit our webpage at www.enplusgroup.com/en/ sustainability/ CORPORATE GOVERNANCE We are committed to… Aluminium Generating Protecting Driving cost for tomorrow clean energy our people leadership 02 04 06 08 Strategic report Financial statements 02 Aluminium for tomorrow 128 Statement of Management’s Responsibilities 04 Generating clean energy 129 Independent Auditors’ Report 06 Protecting our people 133 Consolidated Statement of Profit or 08 Driving cost leadership Loss and Other Comprehensive Income 10 Chairman’s statement 135 Consolidated Statement of Financial Position 14 Pathway to net zero 136 Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows 16 Meeting consumer demand 138 Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity 18 The journey of our products 140 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 20 CEO’s statement 22 Our strategy Appendix 24 At a glance 208 Glossary 26 Business model 215 Contacts 28 Key performance indicators 216 About the Report 30 Investment case 32 Business review Appendices 50 Financial review (provided as a separate document) 66 Sustainability review Appendix 1: Report on compliance with 68 Supporting the UN SDGs the Russian Corporate Governance -
Wwf-Russia Annual Report 2020
WWF-RUSSIA ANNUAL REPORT 2020 © Richard Barrett / WWF-UK CONTENTS BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION 7 SUSTAINABLE FOREST MANAGEMENT 43 SUSTAINABLE FISHERIES 57 CLIMATE AND ENERGY 63 GREEN ECONOMY 69 ENVIRONMENTAL GOVERNANCE 77 WWF STAFF AND BOARD 83 ENGAGEMENT WITH THE PUBLIC, BUSINESS, AND SUPPORTERS 87 ОТДЕЛЕНИЯ WWF: ЗЕЛЕНЫЕ РЕШЕНИЯ 91 WWF-RUSSIA FUNDING 95 © Alexey Perelygin / WWF-Russia WWF-RUSSIA 2020 3 DEAR FRIENDS! The environmental community was expecting 2020 to be a "super-year," a period to summarize the results of conservation work worldwide and make plans for the future. But WE LEARNED A LOT IN 2020: our planet summarized it for us by sending a MAYDAY and indicating the system was seriously flawed. Although early into the pandemic, we often heard that nature got WORKING ONLINE AND WITH VERY cleaner, we can see now that it has been yet another blow to the environment. © Marina Khrapova / WWF-Russia Russia will remember the year 2020 for LIMITED RESOURCES, PREPARING FOR environmental disasters near Norilsk, in the Nenets Autonomous Okrug, Kamchatka, and Khabarovsky Province, which have already prompted changes to the environmental control measures. In 2020, forest and tundra fires reignited with EXTRA RISKS, FINDING UNEXPECTED a vengeance: it was the hottest Arctic summer in history and yet another red flag. We at WWF-Russia worked remotely for the most part of 2020. Despite the pandemic, we managed to complete our main tasks and did not pull a plug on any SOLUTIONS. BUT THE MOST of our environmental programmes. During the summer, we released eight bison into the wild in the Republic of North Ossetia–Alania; they joined the herd that had settled there two years prior. -
Norilsk Nickel Sustainable Update
Expanding the Horizons of Sustainable Growth May 2021 List of Contents 1 Sustainable Development Highlights 2 Health and Safety 3 Environment 4 Climate Change 5 Social 6 Corporate Governance 7 Independent Assessment of ESG Performance 2 Norilsk Nickel Contribution to UN Sustainable Agenda Total spending in 2020 to Participant of the UN Global (1) Compact since 2016 US$ 2.5bn attain sustainable development goals (16,4% of consolidated IFRS revenue) Key SDG-linked projects in 2020 S Social E Environment G Governance > Occupational safety programs > Reduction of environmental footprint in Kola > Improving internal corporate governance structure to ensure better oversight of > Rollout of corporate medicine program > Active construction of "Sulfur program 2.0“ environmental risks and climate change in Norilsk > Designing and rolling out COVID-2019 > Cooperation with federal legislative and response measures > Protection and rational use of water executive authorities, civil society > Maintaining health improvement and > Launch of legacy waste collection in Norilsk institutions, and the business community wellness programmes for employees and > Digitalization projects their families > Clean-up and remediation of an environmental incident > Support of various nature reserves > Support of indigenous peoples > Improving efficiency, industrial safety and > Anti-corruption initiatives > Support of regional communities, social reliability of energy infrastructure and healthcare infrastructure > Joined RMI, RSBN > Supporting various scientific expeditions -
Decommissioning Russia's Old Nuclear Power Reactors: Status
Decommissioning Russia’s old nuclear power reactors: Status update on key processes 2020 1 Decommissioning Russia’s old nuclear power reactors: Status update on key processes 2020 Decommissioning Russia’s old nuclear power reactors Status update on key processes 2020 Published by • Russian Social-Ecological Union / Friends of the Earth Russia (Russia) • Public Eco-Social Movement "Kola Ecocenter" (Apatity - Murmansk oblast, Russia) • Public Council of the South Coast of the Gulf of Finland (St. Petersburg - Leningrad Oblast, Russia) • Za Prirodu/ For Nature (Chelyabinsk, Russia) • Naturvernforbundet/ Friends of the Earth Norway (Norway) Translation from Russian by Vera Savko (chapters 1,2,3 and 5) and Tatiana Mukhamedyarova (chapter 4) Front page design by Kristine Kleppo and Kristian S. Aas For more information, please contact the participating partners directly or refer to our reports, which can be found at the web site of Russian Social-Ecological Union (Friends of the Earth Russia): http://rusecounion.ru/eng/decomatom and at the web site of Naturvernforbundet (Friends of the Earth Norway): http://naturvernforbundet.no/decommissioning-reports St.Petersburg, Sosnovy Bor, Chelyabinsk, Apatity/Murmansk, Oslo – April 2020 2 Decommissioning Russia’s old nuclear power reactors: Status update on key processes 2020 Decommissioning Russia’s old nuclear power reactors Status update on key processes 2020 3 Decommissioning Russia’s old nuclear power reactors: Status update on key processes 2020 Content Introduction 5 1. Current status of nuclear power in Russia 6 2. SOSnovy Bor and the nuclear cluster of the southern shore of the Gulf of Finland 12 3. Lake Imandra as a cooler for old Kola NPP reactors 24 4. -
Our Far North
Head Office 102-3, 102-53 Address: 15, 1st Krasnogvardeysky Drive, Moscow, 123100, Russia OUR Phone: +7 495 787 7667 Email : [email protected] Sustainable Development Department Svetlana Ivchenko, Head of Department SUSTAINABILITY Phone: +7 495 786 8390 FAR REPORT 2020 Nornickel on social media facebook.com/NornickelRU twitter.com/NornikOfficial vk.com/nornickel_official youtube.com/user/NornikOfficial instagram.com/nornickel_official NORTH feeds.feedburner.com/nornik/AIDB Norilsk through the eyes of its residents http://norilskfilm.com/ Corporate website www.nornik.ru NORNICKEL 2020 APPROVED by the Board of Directors of PJSC MMC Norilsk Nickel Minutes No. GMK/12-pr-sd dated 23 April 2021 APPROVED by the Management Board of PJSC MMC Norilsk Nickel Minutes No. GMK/6-pr-p dated 7 April 2021 102-32 ABOUT THE REPORT The 2020 Sustainability Report of Nornickel Group During preparation of the Report, there were no Other sources of information about Nornickel Group: (the “Report”) is the seventeenth public non-financial significant changes in the report boundaries and the list of report prepared by MMC Norilsk Nickel and addressed material topics compared to the 2019 Report. 102–49 Corporate website: www.nornickel.ru/ to a wide range of stakeholders. 102–50 The Report contains updates of the data for previous Nornickel’s ESG highlights: OUR The Report conforms to the GRI Sustainability Reporting years, which is indicated in the text. 102–48 www.nornickel.ru/sustainability/esg-highlights/ Standards (Comprehensive option), constitutes a UN Global Compact communication on progress, The content of the Report has been determined in Nornickel’s annual reports: and discloses the Company’s contribution to accordance with the requirements of the applicable www.nornickel.ru/investors/reports-and-results/ the UN Sustainable Development Goals up to 2030 standards and guidelines, with the Company’s (“UN SDGs”). -
Issue of Accumulation and Redistribution of Oil and Gas Rental Income in the Context of Exhaustible Natural Resources in Arctic Zone of Russian Federation
Journal of Marine Science and Engineering Article Issue of Accumulation and Redistribution of Oil and Gas Rental Income in the Context of Exhaustible Natural Resources in Arctic Zone of Russian Federation Natalia Kirsanova 1,* , Olga Lenkovets 1 and Muhammad Hafeez 2 1 Department of Economic Theory, Saint Petersburg Mining University, 2, 21st Line, 199106 Saint Petersburg, Russia; [email protected] 2 Faculty of Management and Administrative Sciences, University of Sialkot, Punjab 51040, Pakistan; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +7-911-251-82-57 Received: 10 November 2020; Accepted: 30 November 2020; Published: 9 December 2020 Abstract: The significant resource potential of the Arctic has attracted the attention of its adjacent countries and extra-regional states. The mineral and raw material base of the Arctic Zone of the Russian Federation (AZRF) comprises a wide range of minerals. However, due to its hydrocarbon reserves, the Arctic is considered to be the most important geopolitical and geo-economic macro-region for Russia. A significant portion of the Arctic hydrocarbons (about 19%) is concentrated in the territory of Russia’s shelf. The extraction of Arctic marine oil and gas resources and ensuring the sustainability of the Russian energy complex depend significantly on the level of Arctic development. Thus, the pace and quality of the development of AZRF are strategically important to ensure the national interests of the country. It has been proven that the implementation of the state program for AZRF development and strategic plans of the largest companies operating in the region consolidate the raw material nature of AZRF development. -
The Russian Arctic
Master’s Degree in Comparative International Relations Final Thesis The Russian Arctic Supervisor Ch. Prof. Stefano Soriani Assistant supervisor Ch. Prof. Antonio Trampus Graduand Alina Novikova 846190 Academic Year 2017/2018 1 INTRODUCTION This thesis focuses on the essence of the Russian Arctic, on the inhabitants of this area, miscellaneous ethnicities, on the surrounded environment which is characterized by a harsh climate, the management of mineral resources, regional structure, economic activity, focusing on the topic of the Global Warming and the impacts of the Corona Virus on the region. In this thesis I will argue about the Arctic, and its question of the depletion of natural resources, I would like to demonstrate that an unanimous measures should be taken to resolve the challenges of the second part of the XXI century in this area. The international community should act in cooperation resolving not only the economic, humanitarian or scientific issues but they mostly should decide its jurisdictional status, dealing with clashes that may lead states towards the world war. The thesis is divided into two chapters. The first chapter consists of an introduction that gives the comprehensive picture of the Russian Arctic, that is based on the analysis 2 of its geography, administrative structure, infrastructure, ports, investments, as well as the economic activity in the Arctic, and the natural potential which are the precious natural resources. The second chapter deals with the Russian vision of the Arctic: the way the region is governed and militarized, and how this area could become an arena of the future clashes. I will analyze the strategy of the State Program up to 2035 and the fundamental development of the Core Development Zones in the Arctic, examining the risks they currently face, the attitude of the Russian Government towards Non-Governmental Organizations, the current survey of the Climate Change, how it is evaluated by the Russian experts, as well as the impact that the ongoing Covid19 Pandemic has had on the Economy of the Arctic region. -
Annual Report 2020 Annual Report 2020 20 Years Moving Forward
20 YEARS MOVING FORWARD ANNUAL REPORT 2020 ANNUAL REPORT 2020 20 YEARS MOVING FORWARD Contents Financial and Production Indicators 2 General Information on the Company 6 Chairman’s Statement 14 General Director’s Review 18 Business Overview 22 Management Discussion and Analysis 48 Profiles of the Board Members, the General 86 Director and Senior Management Report of the Board of Directors 102 Corporate Governance Report 150 Financial Statements 166 Glossary 260 Appendix A 270 Principal Terms of the Shareholders’ Agreement with the Company Appendix B 274 Principal Terms of the Shareholders’ Agreement between Major Shareholders only Appendix С 280 Report on Compliance with the Russian Corporate Governance Code Appendix D 308 Information on material transactions concluded by the Company and its significant subsidiaries in 2020 Information on the Company 314 Annual report RUSAL 2020 Leading THE INDUSTRY 01. FINANCIAL AND PRODUCTION INDICATORS 2 3 Annual report RUSAL 2020 FINANCIAL AND PRODUCTION INDICATORS USD million (unless otherwise specified) 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 Revenue 8,566 9,711 10,280 9,969 7,983 Adjusted EBITDA 871 966 2,163 2,120 1,489 Adjusted EBITDA Margin 10.2% 9.9% 21.0% 21.3% 18.7% EBIT 279 87 1,481 1,523 1,068 Share of Profits from Associates and 976 1,669 955 620 848 Joint Ventures Pre-Tax Profit 716 1,054 1,953 1,288 1,354 Profit 759 960 1,698 1,222 1,179 Profit Margin 8.9% 9.9% 16.5% 12.3% 14.8% Adjusted Net (Loss)/Profit 60 (270) 856 1,077 292 Adjusted Net (Loss)/Profit Margin 0.7% (2.8%) 8.3% 10.8% 3.7% Recurring Net Profit 990 1,273 1,695 1,573 959 Basic Earnings Per Share 0.050 0.063 0.112 0.080 0.078 (in USD) Total Assets 17,378 17,814 15,777 15,774 14,452 Equity Attributable to Shareholders of 6,543 6,747 5,209 4,444 3,299 the Company Net Debt 5,563 6,466 7,442 7,648 8,421 4 FINANCIAL AND PRODUCTION INDICATORS 5 Annual report RUSAL 2020 Uniting PEOPLE ACROSS CONTINENTS 02. -
OSW Commentary
OSW Commentary CENTRE FOR EASTERN STUDIES NUMBER 346 7.08.2020 www.osw.waw.pl The environmental disaster in the Arctic Moscow’s neo-colonial exploitation of Russia’s regions Jadwiga Rogoża, Iwona Wiśniewska The end of May 2020 saw the biggest known environmental disaster in the Russian Arctic. The thermal power plant in Norilsk in Krasnoyarsk Krai, controlled by the Norilsk Nickel company, contaminated soil and water with more than 21,000 tons of diesel fuel. A month later, the company dumped another portion of toxic substances directly onto the tundra. Although the company has been polluting the region for years, it has thus far remained unpunished. This case illustrates the costs of Russia’s status as a major raw commodity exporter and of Moscow’s policy of exploitation of remote regions, which resembles colonial practices. In these regions, natural resources are being mined in a manner close to over-exploitation, without the necessary protection measures, and the health of the local popula- tion is being put at serious risk. Moscow accumulates the income earned from selling the mined raw materials and at the same time it ignores the interests of local residents – all matters concerning the regions are decided in the capital, frequently behind the scenes, and the regional governments are informed of the decisions afterwards. The Kremlin allows mining companies to operate freely in the regions (including with regards to environmental issues) in exchange for contributions to the state budget and profits for members of the elite associated with President Putin. This practice makes residents of distant regions feel abused and is a source of resentment towards the federal government in Moscow, which is particularly acute in Siberia and the Russian Far East and results in occasional protests.