Application

00566 - PY42 CDBG

00602 - Freese Park Master Plan

Community Development Block Grant (CDBG)

Status: Under Review

Original Submitted Date: 12/01/2015 2:51 PM

Last Submitted Date: 12/01/2015 4:53 PM

Primary Contact

Jackie Lightfield Name:* Salutation First Name Middle Name Last Name

Email: [email protected]

Address: 5 Wall Street

Address Line 2

Address Line 3

Norwalk Connecticut 06850 * City State/Province Postal Code/Zip

203-807-4031 Phone:* Phone Ext.

Fax:

Title: Chief Problem Solver

Organization Information

Name: Norwalk 2.0

Organization Type: Not-for-Profit 501(c)(3)

Organization Website:

Address: P.O. Box 783

Address Line 2 Address Line 3

Norwalk Connecticut 06852 City* City State/Province Postal Code/Zip

Phone: 000-000-0000

Ext.

Fax:

Organization's Staff Capacity

What year was the organization founded? 2010

Number of clients served per year (all programs): 87000

Number of employees (full and part-time): 1

Does the organization have a personnel policy manual with an Yes affirmative action plan and grievance procedure?

Explain your organization's track record with projects of similar Norwalk 2.0 has implemented city-wide public art scope and scale. If your organization has not implemented a project of this scale before, justify why it is equipped to do so projects and is a three year recipient of State of now. (1400 characters or less) Connecticut DECD grants.

Household Information Sheet (HIS) Collection

To download the Household Information Sheet (HIS) in English please click here. The PY42 NOFA explains the concept of an "area benefit" project on page 16. To download the PY42 NOFA in English please click here.

Organizations receiving CDBG funding are required to obtain a Household Information Sheet (HIS) from each program We are providing an area benefit. beneficiary (except for projects providing an Area Benefit).

Public Service Proposals ONLY:

What qualifications and/or training do your service providers have, related to the proposed programming? Please include job title, years of experience, education and minimum qualifications. (1050 characters or less)

Housing, Non-Housing and Public Facilities Proposals ONLY:

What does it mean to manage a facility project financed in part by CDBG funds? This document describes most (but not all) of the required steps in the management process. Please review it carefully and let us know if you have any questions. To download the Subcontract and Facilities Required Tasks list please click here. If you select "Norwalk Redevelopment Agency Staff" to help you manage the project, for $7,500 (not billable to your grant) a staff member will work closely with your organization to successfully accomplish each of these steps.

How do you plan to manage the proposed facility project?

Organization's Financial Capacity

Has the organization received CDBG funding before? No

Please provide the organization's 9-digit DUNS number. 965570646

What is your current operating budget? $120,000 State of Connecticut $50k

Daphne Seyboldt Culpper Foundation $10k Please list your organization's top five funding sources and amounts over the past year. (1050 characters or less) Diana Lenkowsky $10k

The rest of our finding is made up of smaller donations

CDBG financial assistance is provided as a reimbursement for costs already expended. Does your organization have the Yes financial capacity to pay for project/program costs up front?

Totals

Total Cost of Project $35,000

Amount of Request $30,000

If after saving this form, the information below does not equal 0.00, then please go back and edit your answers to "Total Cost of Project," "Amount of Request" and/or your budget numbers below so that they are consistent.

Total Cost $0

Total Requested $0

Budget Activity

Awarded Line Item Request Match* In-Kind Total Amount

Personnel $0 $0 $5,000 $5,000 $0 Services

Subcontracts (costs associated with architectural designs, $30,000 $0 $0 $30,000 $30,000 engineering, contractors and consultants)

Other (travel, marketing, general $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 supplies, etc)

Totals $30,000 $0 $5,000 $35,000

Sources of Match Funding (Expected) Source of Match Funds Date Match Funds Row Amount Match Funding Secured? Will be Secured

Source 1 $0

Source 2 $0

Source 3 $0

Source 4 $0

Totals $0

Comments

Comments (1040 characters or less)

Housing, Non-Housing and Public Facilities Proposals ONLY:

Project budgets should be based upon recent and responsible construction estimates. "Recent and responsible" estimates are those prepared within the last six months by qualified architects or engineers, rehabilitation or code enforcement specialists, contractors or experienced building managers. **Applicants should be aware that such projects are covered under the Davis-Bacon Act (prevailing wages) and should develop budgets accordingly.**

The recent and responsible estimate should be uploaded in the "Required Attachments" form of this application. All projects selected for funding are required to be publicly bid to determine actual project costs.

Applicants are responsible for obtaining their own architectural and engineering resources.

Any physical development project receiving or expending at least $100,000 in federal funding (including CDBG funding) will be subject to the Section 3 provisions set forth by HUD.

Do you, the applicant organization, understand the above information? (If you have questions, please contact Tim Carney ([email protected]) prior to submitting your application.)

General Project Information - Project Summary

Summary Statement

This statement will be provided to Norwalk's elected officials recommending applications for funding and provided to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) if the proposal is funded. In 700 characters or less, please succinctly describe the proposed activity, including the proposed number of beneficiaries.

This project is a planning project to engage a consultant to create a master plan for Freese Park and the connecting parks of Klondike, Avalon, and the Mechanic Street esplanade. The planning Project Summary process will include public and community outreach

(700 characters or less) to engage the neighbors in the development of the master plan. The local business community will also be engaged. This project plan represents a continuation of the Connectivity Master Plan, developed by The Redevelopment Agency. Collaborative Effort

Is this application submitted by a partnership of multiple Yes organizations?

The City of Norwalk's Park and Recs and Public Works, Historical Commission/Historical Society and P&Z supports and is involved in the project as part of the leadership team. The plan will follow the guidelines set by the City of Norwalk.

If yes, then please delineate the role of each partner, identify the organization which will serve as lead administrator and fiduciary of CDBG Program funds, clearly identify the uses of CDBG funds Norwalk 2.0 is acting as the lead administrator of and describe the process for implementing those services the project. For the plan to be adopted by the City provided by the partnership. of Norwalk, the plan will follow the city's common

(1750 characters or less) council and planning and zoning review process, in addtion to any other review process that is required. Because the area includes City assets and potentially CT State assets in the Mechanic Street area, Norwalk 2.0 will work dilligently to ensure that all parties are engaged and involved in this planning project.

Program / Project Location

What is the geographic target area for your proposed project? Wall Street (select one)

The following link may be helpful in identifying your census tract(s). Click here

Census Tract(s) 0434 (LMI Tract), 0436, 0437 (LMI Tract)

Project Location (street address) 0 Main St

Norwalk Connecticut 6850 * City State Zip

Program / Project Information

Please refer to page 12 in the PY42 NOFA to determine the appropriate funding category. To download the PY42 NOFA in English please click here. Para Espanol, por favor clickea aqui.

Funding Category: Planning and Administration

What is the activity's purpose? (select any/all that apply) None of these

This project / program proposes to assist... N/A

Will the project / program be accessible to persons with Yes disabilities (including visual, speech and aural impairments)?

Will the project / program be accessible to persons with limited Yes English proficiency?

General Project Information - Amounts

General Project Information - Project Inputs

General Project Information - Project Activities

CDBG Project Information

Consistency with the Consolidated Plan (ConPlan)

What Priority Need is addressed by this activity? N/A (Planning/Admin Activities ONLY)

What ConPlan Goal does this activity address? N/A (Planning/Admin Activities ONLY)

The selected Goal Matrix Code Definition should correspond with the identified Priority Need, Goal and Code as illustrated on page 7 of the NOFA. Please refer to "Appendix A: CDBG Matrix Codes" to determine the appropriate Goal Matrix Code Definition for your project.

What Goal Matrix Code Definition best describes the proposed Planning (subject to Admin cap) (20) activity?

The selected Matrix Code should correspond with the identified Goal Matrix Code Definition as illustrated on page 7 of the NOFA and defined in Appendix A.

What Matrix Code corresponds to the selected Goal Matrix Code 20 Definition?

Objectives, Accomplishments and Outcomes

National Objective: None - Planning & Admin projects only

Please select the appropriate Accomplishment Type for your activitys identified Matrix Code Definition by referencing Appendix C.

Accomplishment Type: None

Please select the appropriate CDBG Objective Measurement as defined on page 16 of the NOFA. (select one)

Create suitable living environment, Create economic CDBG Objective Measurement opportunities

Please select the appropriate CDBG Outcome Measurement as defined on page 16 and 17 of the NOFA. (select one)

CDBG Outcome Measurement Availability/Accessibility, Sustainability

Beneficiary Information

Does this activity propose providing an Area Benefit? Yes

Please reference this document when answering the following question regarding the percent of program beneficiaries who are expected to have low or moderate income (LMI).

Percent of Beneficiaries who qualify as LMI (Low/Moderate 65.0% Income)

The project's accomplishment type was identified previously in this application by referencing Appendix C.

Number of Proposed Beneficiaries per the identified 9661 Accomplishment Type: Dollars per beneficiary $3

Project/Program Implementation

Project / Program Implementation Schedule

Please list the 5 most important steps for implementing your project / program and when they would be initiated during the July through June program year. (50 characters or less per step)

Put out RFP for Master Plan 1st Quarter: July 1 - Step 1* Bids September 30

Select Consultant and begin 2nd Quarter: October 1 - Step 2* Community Out reach December 31

3rd Quarter: January 1 - Project Management Step 3* March 31

Finalize have City of Norwalk 4th Quarter: April 1 - June 30 Step 4 adopt Master Plan

Step 5

How ready are you?

Assuming CDBG funding was in place, how soon could you Ready (could begin in 0-3 months) implement the first step on your list?

How many months do you anticipate the project / program 8 needing/taking from start to finish?

Conflict of Interest

Pursuant to Title 24, §570.611 of the Code of Federal Regulations, no persons who exercise any functions or responsibilities with respect to HUD-funded activities, or who are in a position to participate in the decision making process or gain inside information with regard to such activities, may obtain a financial interest or benefit from a HUD-funded activity, or have a financial interest, including compensation, in any contract, subcontract or agreement with respect to a HUD-funded activity, or with respect to the proceeds of a HUD-funded activity, either for themselves or those with whom they have business or immediate family ties, during their tenure or for one year after.

HUD defines family ties as the spouse, parent (including stepparent), child (including stepchild), brother, sister (including stepbrother or stepsister), grandparent, grandchild, and in-laws of a covered person, regardless of whether the relation is by blood, marriage or adoption.

Please select those members of Norwalk's Common Council who may have a conflict of interest with the proposed organization None and/or proposed activity.

The identification of a Council member(s) does not automatically disqualify your application.

Required Attachments Attachment Description File Name File Size Type

REQUIRED: Current IRS Determination irs_determination_ltr.pdf 1.3 MB pdf 501(c)3 Certification Letter

REQUIRED: List of board_addresses Board Addresses 1.3 MB pdf Board of Directors copy.pdf

REQUIRED: Minutes June Board Minutes Norwalk 2.0 minutes 1.3 MB pdf from last board meeting Approved June 24, 2015.pdf

REQUIRED: Equal Opportunity/Non- Non discrimination Discrimination EOCStatement.pdf 1.3 MB pdf Statement statement on Agency letterhead

REQUIRED: Statement on Agency letterhead identifying the means by CopyofESLStatement.p which your organization ESL statement 1.3 MB pdf df will serve persons who are not proficient in English.

REQUIRED: Current Operating Budget lined Current Operating Oct_2015 2.0 Budget- 1.3 MB pdf up with Previous Year's Budget Budget.pdf Operating Budget

Commitment Letters for Letters of Support from Secured Match Funding Parks and Rec and Letters_of_support.pdf 1.3 MB pdf (when applicable) Historical Society

PUBLIC FACILITIES REQUIRED: Recent Responsible Estimate Heritiage_Bid_pckg.pdf 1.3 MB pdf and Responsible Project for Master Plan Estimate

PUBLIC FACILITIES REQUIRED: Building 1.3 MB Management Plan

PUBLIC FACILITIES REQUIRED: Two Photos of the Subject 1.3 MB Property (please convert to PDF prior to uploading)

PUBLIC FACILITIES: Owner's Statement of Approval and Contact 1.3 MB Information (when applicable) PUBLIC FACILITIES: Lease for Site of 1.3 MB Renovations (when applicable)

Statement of Agreement

Jaqueline Lightfield 12/01/2015 Signed:* Please type the name Date

Name: Jackie LIghtfield

Title: Chief Problem Solver

Agency/Org: Norwalk 2.0

Norwalk 2.0 Board Addresses

Name Title Address

Maribeth Becker President 28 Morgan Ave. Norwalk, CT 06851

Jaqueline Light eld Treasurer 5 Wall Street Norwalk CT 06850

Diana Lenkowsky Secretary 31 Canon St. Norwalk, CT 06851

Bruce Bein eld Vice President 33 N. Water St. A/710 Norwalk, CT 06854

David Waters Director 3 Deer eld Rd Wilton, CT 06897

Lenny Dinardo Director 14 Outer Rd. Norwalk , CT 06854

Suzanne Ancona Director 118 French St. Fair eld, CT 06824 Norwalk 2.0 Minutes Date: June 24, 2015 Time: 7:15 pm Place: Fountain Head Present: Suzanne Ancona, Maribeth Becker, Bruce Beinfield, Diana Lenkowsky, Jackie Lightfield, David Waters

Minutes: Minutes of previous meeting of Ma7 4, 2015 were approved unanimously.

Treasurer’s Report: The Treasurer’s report was approved unanimously. Available funds of $69,444 include the DECD $50,000 Placemaking grant funding designated for the shipping container project, which must be spent by June 30, 2015.

SONO Beach:

Jackie reported that we are purchasing two shipping containers with glass garage type doors. There will be sand and through an agreement with Zoning, L.L. Ever-green will store, but not sell, evergreen material on the site. Bruce has volunteered to oversee the site plan. Food trucks will be permitted for special events. John Estonia has been hired to manage onsite logistics. The board approved the employment of two interns for the season.

Wall Street:

Jackie and Maribeth assigned the board the task of reviewing several potential candidates for the Community Conversations Series.

El Mexicana has been sold and Goodwill employees are cleaning up the streets, planters and tree grates.

The Wall Street Theater project is moving slowly and they are hoping to have a 100th birthday celebration of the original theater on September 27, closing the street.

It appears that DiScala has found another financial partner and will be able to move ahead with Head of the Harbor.

The Mall:

Jackie and Bruce, who have reviewed the design, expressed concern about the lack of connectivity to the surrounding neighborhood, specifically the lack of sidewalk connections, the 300’ bridge over North Water Street, underground parking and unfortunate location of “community space”. There is no DSSD in Norwalk to promote the connectivity issue, but Norwalk 2.0 and NRA will bring attention to this issue.

Fundraising:

We are still seeking funding for Discover Norwalk Walking Tours. Jackie and Maribeth are pursuing DECD art grants, which focus on community engagement through the arts; maximum award id $35,000. Jackie also following the progress of the State Learning Corridor proposal. Other Business:

Jackie reviewed the presentation that she made to The Fairfield County Cultural Alliance regarding how todays creative economy differs from yesterday’s industrial economy, Economy”, which Maribeth said was extremely well received.

Other Business:

Maribeth reported that the container project presentation that Jackie and Maribeth brought to the NEFA at their New Hampshire meeting was highly rated.

Adjournment: The meeting was adjourned at 9:15 pm.

Next Meeting Date: July 29 at 7:30 pm, location to be determined.

Norwalk 2.0 provides equal employment opportunities (EEO) to all employees and applicants for employment without regard to race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, disability or genetics. In addition to federal law requirements, Norwalk 2.0 complies with applicable state and local laws governing nondiscrimination in employment in every location in which the company has facilities. This policy applies to all terms and conditions of employment, including recruiting, hiring, placement, promotion, termination, layoff, recall, transfer, leaves of absence, compensation and training.

Norwalk 2.0 expressly prohibits any form of workplace harassment based on race, color, religion, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, national origin, age, genetic information, disability, or veteran status. Improper interference with the ability of Norwalk 2.0’s employees to perform their job duties may result in discipline up to and including discharge.

Norwalk 2.0 makes every effort to be accessible in multiple languages.

Norwalk 2.0 hace todo lo posible para ser accesible en varios idiomas.

Norwalk 2.0 se efforce d'être accessible en plusieurs langues.

2.0 2015 BUDGET

ACTUAL SUMMARY BUDGET VS. ACTUAL

$40,000.00 Utilities 4% Travel $30,000.00 Administrative1% 14% Professional Services$20,000.00 Marketing 36% 1% $10,000.00

$0.00 Professional Supplies:Services AdministrativePrinting in-kind Travel Other

Supplies: Program

44% Budget Actual

Professional Services Supplies: Program Supplies: Administrative Marketing Printing Administrative Cash on Hand September 30, 2015: $28,061.62 in-kind Legal/Admin Travel Utilities Other SUMMARY BY CATEGORY

Category Budget ACP GRANT Actual Difference

Professional Services $30,000.00 $20,000.00 $25,000.00 $5,000.00

Supplies: Program $28,000.00 $20,000.00 $30,744.98 ($2,744.98)

Supplies: Administrative $5,000.00 $246.41 $4,753.59

Marketing $14,000.00 $7,000.00 $802.01 $13,197.99

Printing $3,000.00 $328.29 $2,671.71

Administrative $18,000.00 $9,813.05 $8,186.95 in-kind $5,225.00 $0.00 $5,225.00

Legal/Admin $3,000.00 $3,000.00 $0.00 $3,000.00

Travel $1,000.00 $369.50 $630.50

Utilities $6,000.00 $2,814.54 $3,185.46

1 Category Budget ACP GRANT Actual Difference

Other $6,775.00 $90.00 $6,685.00

Expense Total $120,000.00 $50,000.00 $70,208.78 $49,791.22

SUMMARY BY INCOME

Category INCOME Budget INCOME ACP INCOME Actual Difference

Income $120,000.00 $50,000.00 $18,680.69 $51,319.31

Income Total $120,000.00 $50,000.00 $18,680.69 $51,319.31

2

December 1, 2015

City of Norwalk Common Council 125 East Ave. Norwalk CT 06851

Re: CDBG PY42

To Members of the Common Council,

I am writing in support of the CDBG project submitted by Norwalk 2.0. This project is part of a long-term vision to enhance Norwalk’s Wall Street area.

The Norwalk Historical Society has worked closely with the City of Norwalk over the last ten years to make huge strides in improving Mill Hill Historic Park. We have also worked to support the Head of the Harbor development, along with developing our own improvements to the Smith Street Jail and Barn.

This project is to create a master plan to enhance the appearance and functionality of Freese Park, Klondike Pike, the Mechanic Street riverfront walk ways, and connectivity to the Avalon riverfront walk way.

The Norwalk Historical Society supports the this project because it is a good use of the CDBG planning funds and will enhance the City’s investment in the Wall Street area. As the City of Norwalk continues to grow, this project continues the investment in an area of Norwalk where the need is great.

We thank you for your thoughtful consideration in approving this project.

Sincerely yours,

David Westmoreland Board of Directors

1 December 2015

Mr. Bruce Kimmel, President Norwalk Common Council Norwalk City Hall 125 East Avenue Norwalk, CT 06856

RE: Freese Park Improvements

Dear Mr. Kimmel and Members of the Common Council,

Heritage Landscapes is pleased to respond to the request by Norwalk 2.0 to provide an estimate of landscape architectural services for the development of a schematic landscape master plan for Freese Park. Located at the intersection of Main and Wall Streets, the park is a valued public landscape at the core of the Wall Street Historic District. The park’s location at an important intersection can serve as an important resource contributing to the livability of the city, improving the experience of the district and fostering economic investment in our downtown area. The park sits at a critical juncture as a link between the adjacent public landscapes that include Klondike Park at the head of the Harbor Trail, the Mechanic Street Esplanade and the Avalon riverfront walkway.

Heritage Landscapes has carried out a series of successful park planning projects in the past three decades. We focus on reaching consensus to develop realistic, achievable plans through collaborating with the city and stakeholders. We anticipate that the scope of landscape architecture professional services for Park Schematic Landscape Master Plan development will include:

 Meet with City, Non-Profit, and desired stakeholders (the client group) to discuss the overall project scope, identify issues as they relate to the park and walk the park  Develop a detailed existing park plan, updating a park digital drawing file from the City, current aerial photography and on-site field reconnaissance  Analyze historic records and photographs from the Norwalk Museum to gain an understanding of the park’s origins from the 1955 flood to contemporary times, and use an analysis of the park’s evolution to inform future park design  Meet and conduct a work session with the client group to present the overall findings from historic document review, on site reconnaissance, and preliminary design concepts for park improvements  Conduct a public work session to review findings, receive comments on preliminary design ideas and obtain public input for park improvements  Submit a 50% complete draft schematic landscape master plan to the City for review and comment

Heritage Landscapes LLC Preservation Landscape Architects & Planners PO Box 321 Charlotte, Vermont 802.425.4330 34 Wall Street Norwalk, Connecticut 203.852.9966 1 December 2015, Name addressed, Page 2

 Submit a 90% complete Refine the Schematic Design Master Plan that incorporates comments from the client group  Present the 90% complete master plan at a public meeting  Submit a final Freese Park Schematic Master Plan that addresses input from the community and the client group  Meet with the City to discuss and develop next steps toward implementation of the Schematic Landscape Master plan

This Freese Park Schematic Master Plan will serve as a framework for future improvements to the green space and, once implemented, will revitalize the park and uplift the experience of park users.

PROPOSED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES & EXPENSES FEE & BILLING Heritage Landscapes proposes that professional staffing and expenses to undertake this important planning effort will be $29,950 in total. Project staff including Peter Viteretto, Professional Landscape Architect, and Thomas Helmkamp, ACAD technical staff, Heritage Landscapes Principal and Professional Landscape Architect, Patricia O'Donnell, FASLA will participate and provide quality assurance review for each task. Progress billing will be submitted monthly accompanied by a memorandum noting progress on project tasks by percentage complete. Completed document submission will follow the agreed project schedule. Professional services fees are anticipated at $29,500 (twenty nine thousand five hundred dollars) with direct expenses for travel between Charlotte, VT and Norwalk, CT and document printing costs included. Billing will be sent forward based on percentage completion monthly. If additional tasks are required these will be undertaken only as requested in writing by the City at Heritage Landscapes staff rates, which are O’Donnell $205/hour, Viteretto $125/hour, Helmkamp $75/hour.

PROPOSED SCHEDULE: (to be developed ) Heritage Landscapes anticipates the duration of this undertaking as to 16 to 20 weeks for completion of the above tasks. We will work with the City to develop an acceptable project schedule for project work sessions, public meeting and submission of documents for review. We anticipate project start-up directly after approval of this proposal and receipt of the digital park plan file.

Please let us know if you would like additional information. Attached with this proposal is a firm description, principal and staff resumes, an abbreviated project list, and selected project information sheets. If you wish to know more about our work contact us or visit www.heritagelandscapes.com.

We look forward to hearing from you. Thank you for your consideration.

Patricia M. O'Donnell, PLA, FASLA, Principal Peter F. Viteretto, PLA, Senior Associate

Heritage Landscapes LLC Preservation Landscape Architects & Planners PO Box 321 Charlotte, Vermont 05445 802-425-4330 34 Wall St. Norwalk, Connecticut 06850, 203-852-9966

Heritage Landscapes LLC . Firm Description Introduction . Heritage Landscapes LLC is a national and international leader in revitalizing heritage assets and sustaining communities. We work at the entangled intersection of culture and nature, economy and society, partnering with respected clients and colleagues to promote recognition and stewardship of the diverse values of shared places, vessels of heritage. Valuing quality of life and authentic experience, we employ a range of preservation and green design tools to reclaim the legacies of historic places. Communities and their public landscapes are a collective inheritance, given by past generations, for our experience and toward the enrichment of the unborn. Through documentary research and holistic assessment, we to decode design intent from innate influences and express the multiple values of landscape within the realistic limitations of our times. Making well- considered interventions, we sustain, repair, reuse, update and revitalize significant places. With deep appreciation for these combined works of humanity and nature, we seek to imbue urban and rural communities and places with vitality, sustainability and resilience, integrating low-impact design, alternative energy, etc., while respecting heritage to enhancing meaning and access for all.

Celebrating 28 years of exceptional work, Heritage Landscapes LLC is a woman-owned professional firm and small business with offices in Charlotte, VT and Norwalk, CT. Since 1987, we have focused on culturally valuable landscapes and communities completing over 500 successful projects, including 39 National Historic Landmarks, and garnering 73 professional awards. Varied planning and landscape architecture scopes address community, civic, campus, park, parkway, linear corridor, museum, estate, historic site, cemetery and residential heritage assets. Our diverse body of work encompasses the diversity of heritage national and international heritage. Project scopes range from cultural landscape research to construction administration often addressing design studies, historic research, existing conditions, analysis, community outreach, interpretation, heritage tourism, management, construction documents and varied implementation initiatives. Products take the form of focused reports, comprehensive plans and guidelines, signage, brochures, fundraising materials, staff and volunteer information, construction documents, strategic plans, management plans, and maintenance calendars. Heritage Landscapes expertise in cultural landscape stewardship embraces all aspects of the vitality and relevance of valued heritage for tomorrow.

Our Approach We begin projects by understanding the tangible and intangible values inherent in and ascribed to cultural properties and their historic evolution. Informed by the project mission and goals and the landscape program, we conduct our work in partnership with owners, stewards and stakeholders toward safeguarding, modifying to suit current needs, communicating about and planning to ensure the perpetuation of historically significant cultural landscapes. Our work is fully informed by national and international preservation standards, guidelines, charters and declarations. Projects conform to the precepts and treatment concepts of federal guidance, and local and regional advice. We integrate current best practices appropriately to respond to and innovate on green objectives. Though treasured for their tangible and intangible values, the viability of cultural landscapes depends on effective initiatives that honor unique character, promote full use, foster enjoyment, and incorporate multiple aspects of sustainability. A holistic approach to sustainable design addresses cultural, natural, societal, and economic aspects of planning and projects for this and future generations. For example, at Shelburne Farms, National Historic Landmark, we guided the unobtrusive siting of a solar orchard with trail and school bus access for informational visits. Understanding places across the fourth dimension - time past, present, future - is at the root of suitable yet innovative solutions. Heritage Landscapes LLC Preservation Landscape Architects & Planners 501 Lake Road, Charlotte, VT 05445 802.425.4330 34 Wall Street, Norwalk, CT 06850 203.852.9966 Grounded in cultural landscape values and we embrace principles of sustainability, functionality, aesthetics and communication. Preservation is inherently green, and is reinforced with contemporary green practices in our work. The convergence of cultural and natural resource considerations is a pivotal element that incorporates a solid understanding of integrated systems and processes. We seek to communicate messages about the heritage property and its cultural or historic values, to residents and visitors through varied media, including design cues, focal elements, signs, brochures, digital tours, etc. Because public landscapes are places for people of all abilities to experience and enjoy, we are committed to providing universal access by redesigning circulation systems in a manner that respects historic landscape character. Based on our extensive work in landscape management we provide our clients with approaches that incorporate maintenance issues, providing change management tools and maintenance schedules for efficient human resources use. A holistic research, analysis and design approach addresses multiple issues simultaneously to yield place-based, traditional, and durable materials with a grace of application and detail. Our interest is in visionary, yet realistic planning and projects that add vibrancy to valued places and are readily implemented.

Context for Success Our historical knowledge has been enriched over time through varied types, scales and significances of landscapes we have learned from and improved. As a result, we understand origins and evolution of communities, sites, vernacular and designed landscapes bringing a broadly researched context to all our works. World Heritage projects for Old San Juan, Puerto Rico, Birmingham, Alabama, Intramuros, Manila and India's heritage cities engage living cities, heritage assets, development, governance, for integrated sustainability and change management. Our urban work on systems of public spaces, parks, and parkways for Baltimore, Rochester, Fort Wayne, Louisville, Pittsburgh, Chicago has provided opportunities for research, planning and implementation projects that address a valued nation-wide legacy. Exploring public institutions and government campuses at Washington DC Capitol Square, Senate Parks, National Mall, and the Capitols at Virginia, West Virginia and Wyoming, has provided a firm foundation in iconic public landscapes to resolve current issues. Commissions for historic city and inter-city parkways garnered a context for parkway design, principles, and evolution. We have investigated the grounds of notable figures in American history at Abraham Lincoln's Home and Cottage, Thomas Jefferson's Poplar Forest and University of Virginia, Washington Irving's Sunnyside, Elisabet Ney's Formosa, James Deering's Vizcaya, Pierre S. du Pont's Longwood, and Ernest Hemingway's Finca Vigia, Cuba. Expertise in modern works was gained through commissions on Fletcher Steele's Garden Amphitheatre, Frank Lloyd Wright's Graycliff, Louis I. Kahn's Bathhouse, John O. Simonds' Mellon Square, and Russel Wright's Manitoga. Our work on military properties, like Valley Forge, the Continental Army Winter Encampment, Conanicut Battery on Narragansett Bay, Redoubts at West Point, and the York and James Peninsula Revolutionary and Civil War sites, informs our understanding of military history and landscape character. Likewise, cemeteries, monument grounds, places of commemoration, and religious pilgrimage sites embody enduring social values that are expressed in the landscape. Recent landscape management frameworks for the Joseph Smith Birthplace, The Cummer Museum and Gardens, and Vizcaya bring landscape curation to new levels underpinning quality of experience and sound stewardship. We bring a depth and breadth of knowledge to each new project.

Collaboration & Teamwork Collaboration is the key to excellent results. Our diverse clients include not- for-profit entities, citizen advocacy groups, museums and institutions, private owners and municipal, state and federal agencies. We consider clients as full partners in project work, articulating goals, shaping project programs, providing data on staffing and funding capabilities, clarifying community and visitor issues, weighing alternatives, and making decisions. As effective members of inter-disciplinary teams, we serve in both team leader and subconsultant roles. Award-winning work is an outcome of a well-informed, talented, creative and dedicated team. Our plans, implementation strategies, sustainable practices and management guidance all ensure that multiple needs are met as cultural, fiscal, environmental, social, and recreational values are incorporated. Working with our clients, partners, teams, stakeholders, community leaders and the involved public, Heritage Landscapes envisions a positive, informative, and satisfying future for heritage landscapes of all types that sustains culture, ecology, economy and community.

Heritage Landscapes LLC, Firm Description, Page 2

PLANNING & IMPLEMENTATION PROJECTS

Heritage Landscapes is a small, high-quality firm providing professional consulting in preservation landscape architecture and planning for historic properties of various types and scales including cemeteries, historic sites, museums, national parks and monuments, capitols, modern landscapes, historic private properties, communities, campuses, botanical gardens, arboreta, battlefields, military sites, park systems, parkways, and parks. The project list is organized into headings, demonstrating the range of Heritage Landscapes' expertise in planning, implementation, management, maintenance, and interpretation of varied cultural landscapes. In this list, the project and location are followed by the original design professionals and/or development period. In order to avoid repetition the role of Heritage Landscapes is assumed as project leader with subconsultants credited. When we serve as preservation subconsultants for landscape architecture and planning, the project lead is listed and our role noted. Multiple projects for a single historic landscape are noted by title and date. Projects are arranged with current work first, in reverse chronological order by topic.

HISTORIC CITIES & COMMUNITIES

Intramuros, Manila, World Heritage Site, addressing governance, regulation and finance aspects of revitalization, Patricia O'Donnell, senior expert, The World Bank, Social Development.

Bhutan Heritage Villages, Kingdom of Bhutan, guidelines for village heritage stewardship plan including sustainable management contributions to Poverty and Social Impact Analysis of Bhutan’s Draft Heritage Sites Act, 2013, Patricia O'Donnell, senior expert, The World Bank, Social Development.

Heritage Cities of India, Inclusive Heritage-based City Development Demonstration Program, Guidelines on Urban Revitalization of Indian Heritage Cities 2014, Patricia O'Donnell, senior expert, The World Bank, Social Development.

Historic Nauvoo, Nauvoo, IL, Church Headquarters 1839-1846, National Historic Landmark; Historic Nauvoo Master Plan, 2014, for the LDS Church, Church History., Church History.

Old San Juan, Puerto Rico, World Heritage themes and property extension assessment, workshop, reporting, mapping and meetings with US Interior and NPS, for Puerto Rico Historic Preservation Office, 2012.

Barre Multi-Use Path, Barre City and Barre Town, VT, historic resources impact assessment, lead BroadReach Planning & Design, 2010; for the Central Vermont Regional Planning Commission.

Rio de Janiero, Carioca Landscape between the Sea & Mountains, World Heritage Nomination Framing Workshop, Michael Turner, Israel, Katri Litzin, Sweden, Patricia O'Donnell, USA, hosted by IPHAN, the Brazilian Culture Ministry; 2009, resulted in successful inscription, 2012.

Heritage Landscapes LLC Preservation Landscape Architects & Planners 501 Lake Road, Charlotte, Vermont 05445 802.425.4330 34 Wall Street, Norwalk, Connecticut 06850 203.852.9966

Bridge Street Bicycle & Pedestrian Feasibility Study, Richmond, VT, historic resources impact assessment, lead BroadReach Planning & Design, for the Town of Richmond, 2009.

Birmingham Civil Rights, AL, Alabama Christian Movement, resulting in the National Civil Rights Act, 1964; Preliminary Preservation Planning for US World Heritage Tentative listed property, toward potential nomination, 2008; for the Birmingham Historical Society.

Ardmore Avenue, Fort Wayne, IN; Wildwood Park, Arthur Shurcliff 1916; Planning & Schematic Design Ardmore Corridor Truck Route with Noise Mitigation & Aesthetic Treatment for Adjacent Historic Wildwood Park Neighborhood, 2007; for Fort Wayne Public Works; Review of Engineer’s Report For Roadway Improvements, with Wilbur Smith Associates, 2005; for Wildwood Park Community Association.

Hopewell Township, NJ; Design Guidelines: A Guide for Maintaining and Rehabilitating Historic Buildings and Landscapes, Guidelines for Historic Landscapes, 2005; lead Preservation Design Partnership; for Historic Preservation Commission, Township of Hopewell, award-winning project.

Riverside, IL, Olmsted, Vaux & Company Landscape Architects, 1869; Riverside Landscape Architecture District, National Historic Landmark Amendment with Charles E. Beveridge PhD., historian, 2003; for Village of Riverside.

Mount Zion Historic Neighborhood, Somers, NY, National Historic Landmark, 1730s; Mount Zion Historic Neighborhood Cultural Landscape Report & Preservation Recommendations, 2003; Mount Zion Neighborhood Preservation Assessment, 1999; for Town of Somers and Somers Historical Society.

Llewellyn Park, West Orange, NJ, A.J. Davis and Llewellyn Haskell, Howard Daniels, Eugene Baumann, 1850s; Llewellyn Park Rambles Historic Landscape Report & Comprehensive Plan, 2001; Rehabilitation Plan for the Greeting & Social Circle, 2000; for Llewellyn Park Ladies Association & Committee of Managers.

Greenmanville Streetscape at the Mystic Seaport Museum, Mystic, CT, Route 27; Greenmanville Corridor Streetscape Design and Construction Documents, parallel to CA Engineers, 1999; for the Mystic Seaport Museum, Town of Stonington, 1997, $1.8 million construction, ISTEA funding.

Cape Coast, Ghana, Conservation & Tourism Development Plan: the Public Realm, Heritage Preservation, and Tourism, Charrette and Report, US ICOMOS, Patricia O'Donnell, contributor and report editing,1999.

Camp Dudley Road Historic District, Westport, NY; Camp Dudley Road Historic Landscape Assessment, and testimony, 1994; for the Camp Dudley Road Association.

Borden Properties: Home Farm & Condensary, Ulster & Orange Counties, NY, John Gail Borden, 1887- 1930s; Borden Properties Historic Landscape Report, Part I: History & Field Research, 1992; Rural Landscape Preservation Approach, 1992; Technical Assistance, 1990; for Shawangunk, Preservation League of NYS, Shawangunk and Gardiner Historical Society, funded by Open Space Coalition, NYS Arts Council.

Asheville Interpretive Urban Trail, Asheville, NC; Downtown Interpretive Trail Plan Charette, Heritage Landscapes, Charles Birnbaum, Project Manager, 1991; for Asheville Downtown Development Corporation.

Putnam River Trail, Putnam, CT, Quinnipiac River Multi-use trail and park, lead CA Engineers, as schematic design, construction documents with handicap access, signage, vegetation management program, ISTEA funded, 1997, for Putnam Economic Development Commission and Town of Putnam,

Heritage Landscapes LLC, Projects List, Page 2

Cheney Brothers National Landmark District, Manchester, CT; Great Lawn Zoning Regulation & Preservation Recommendations, 1990; for Connecticut Trust for Historic Preservation.

Town of Guilford, Preservation and Scenic Conservation Master Plan, Guilford, CT, with F.P. Clark Associates traffic and environmental, 1986; for Guilford Preservation Alliance, award-winning project.

CAPITOLS & CAMPUSES

Library of Congress Grounds of Jefferson, Adams and Madison Buildings, Washington, DC; Smithmeyer and Pelz, Pierson and Wilson, DeWitt, Poor and Shelton, Architects, 1898 to 1980, Cultural Landscape Report, 2014; URS contract, for the Architect of the Capitol.

Union Square, Squares 575, 576 and 578, Washington, DC; A.J. Downing, F.L. Olmsted, Jr., SOM Architects, 1850 to 1970s, Union Square, US Botanical Garden, Bartholdi Square, and Square 575 Cultural Landscape Report, 2014; Beyer Blinder Belle contract, for the Architect of the Capitol.

Wyoming Capitol, Cheyenne, WY, Wyoming State Capitol Restoration and Renovation, historic landscape evolution and assessment, Capitol Grounds Schematic Design, HDR and PDP Architects, lead, 2014; for State of Wyoming Administration & Information Construction Management.

Senate Parks, Washington, DC; Senate Parks Cultural Landscape Report, 2012; Parsons, 1927 to 1935, with Vitetta Architects, HCM Landscape Architects, Faithful & Gould estimators, 2014; for the Architect of the Capitol.

Capitol Square, Washington, DC; Frederick Law Olmsted, Sr., 1874 to 1894, Capitol Square Cultural Landscape Report, 2012; Vitetta Architects lead, with HCM Landscape Architects, Faithful & Gould estimator, The Care of Trees arborist, for the Architect of the Capitol.

Thomas Jefferson's Academical Village, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA; National Historic Landmark and World Heritage Site; 1817 to 1827 initial build, Cultural Landscape Report, Part 1 History Existing & Analysis, 2012-13; for Office of the Architect.

Thomas H. Bayly Building, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA; 1933; Cultural Landscape Assessment for Historic Structure Report, John Milner Architects lead, 2012-13; for Office of the Architect.

St. Elizabeths Hospital, Washington, DC; Government Hospital for the Insane, Thomas U. Walter and Charles H. Nichols 1852-1877, National Historic Landmark; research and plans for Section 106 compliance; St. Elizabeth’s West Campus: Team Coordination 2010-2012 for Landscape Implementation Plan with Andropogon Associates; Landscape Preservation Plan, 2010; Landscape Management Plan, draft 2009; Cultural Landscape Report with Robinson & Associates, historians, 2007; Landscape Assessment Plan for Building, Landscape & Archeological Assessment Study, team lead Farewell, Mills & Gatsch Architects, LLC with Hunter Research and Hanscomb Inc; 2005; for General Services Administration.

West Virginia Capitol Complex, Charleston, WV; Cass Gilbert, 1921-1934, Cass Gilbert Jr., 1950s; Cass Gilbert Jr. Building 3 Landscape Design & Construction Documents 2011; Capitol Complex Master Plan, Heritage Landscapes Landscape Architects, team lead Michael Baker Jr. Inc. and RMJM Hillier Preservation, 2009; for State of West Virginia General Services Division.

Richardson Olmsted Complex, Buffalo, NY; former Buffalo State Insane Asylum, Frederick Law Olmsted, Sr.

Heritage Landscapes LLC, Projects List, Page 3 and Calvert Vaux, Olmsted Vaux & Co. 1870, H. H. Richardson, Architect, 1870; Richardson Olmsted Complex Cultural Landscape Report, team lead Goody Clancy Associates, Historic Structures Report, with Francis R. Kowsky, Historian, and Martin Wachadlo, Historian, 2008; for Richardson Center Corporation.

Bush-Holley House, Museum & Archive, Greenwich, CT; Historic Site Landscape Assessment for Conditions, Management, Maintenance, Wayfinding & Interpretation, July 2008; Phases 1, 2, 3 Construction Documents for Restoration & Rehabilitation, Storehouse, Archives, Barn, 2001, parallel to Lorie Jones Architects and Austin Patterson/Michael Glynn, Architects; Bush-Holley Historic Landscape Report, ADA access and town approvals, 1997; for the Historical Society of the Town of Greenwich.

Virginia Capitol & Capitol Square, Richmond, VA; Thomas Jefferson, Architect, 1782, Landscape Design by Godefroy 1818, Notman 1850, Browne, 1906; Restoration, Rehabilitation and Extension of Virginia Capitol & Capitol Square, 2005-2007; Virginia Capital Square Research & Schematic Design, 2004; lead Hillier Architecture; for General Services, Commonwealth of Virginia, award-winning project.

Camden Public Library, Garden Amphitheatre, Library Grounds, Meadow and Harbor Park, Camden, ME; Fletcher Steele, 1928-1931, Olmsted Brothers, 1930-1935; Fauns Garden Restoration, 2006; Camden Amphitheater Restoration, 2004; Harbor Park Rehabilitation, 2004; Community Consensus, Camden Library Independent Commission, 2002; Library Grounds & Meadow Rehabilitation, 1999; Atlantic Avenue with Coffin Engineers, 1998; Historic Landscape Report and Preservation Treatment Plan, with Robin Karson and Charles E. Beveridge, PhD., landscape historians, 1997; for Camden Public Library Board and Camden Amphitheatre & Harbor Park Conservancy, award-winning projects.

Bronx Community College, Bronx, NY; former New York University, McKim Mead & White Historic Complex, 1890s, Calvert Vaux and Olmsted Brothers, BCC Historic Core Cultural Landscape Report and conservation recommendations, Getty Historic Campus Conservation Grant 2005; lead Easton Architects, for CUNY.

Dumbarton Oaks, Georgetown, DC; Roberts Woods and Mildred Bliss, Landscape Architects Beatrix Jones Farrand, 1921-1944, Ruth Havey, Robert Patterson, Alden Hopkins, Ralph Griswold, Robert Zion, 1944 to 1966; Research Library and Gardeners Court, lead Venturi Scott Brown Architects, James Urban, landscape architect, 2002-2003; West Campus Master Plan, lead Hartman Cox Architects, 2001; Heritage Landscapes lead for Dumbarton Oaks Cultural Landscape Report Part I, with Lampl Associates, 2001; and Dumbarton Oaks Partial CLR Part II, 2001; for the Trustees of Harvard University.

Gracie Mansion, Manhattan, NY; NYC Mayor Residence, Archibald Gracie, c1780-1820; historic plant materials consultant, Renovation of the Gracie Mansion Perimeter Wall and Landscape, lead Philip N. Winslow, Landscape Architect, 1982; for Gracie Mansion Conservancy.

CITY PARK & OPEN SPACE SYSTEMS

Pittsburgh, PA; Regional Parks & Boulevards, Pittsburgh, PA, 1880s to 1950s; Regional Parks System Master Plan Update, lead LBA 2011; Regional Parks Management Study, with ETM Associates, Brigid Sullivan, Ralph Crider, 2006; Regional Parks Standard Bench Designs 2005; Frick Park & Riverview Park Sign Concepts, 2004; Regional Parks Lighting Guidelines, with LBA and Grenald Waldron 2001; Regional Parks Wayfinding & Signage Overall Concept Design and Visitor Maps with Kolano Design, 2001; Regional Parks Master Plan, with Barry Hannegan and Brown & Carlisle, lead LBA/Michael A. Stern, 2001; Frick Park Projects Frick Park Environmental Education Center & Outdoor Classrooms, Pre-Design & Estimate 2008; Frick Park EEC Relocation study, lead Biohabitats, 2003; Homewood Entry Landscape Restoration, with LDA Architects for

Heritage Landscapes LLC, Projects List, Page 4 historic gateway building 2000; Highland Park Projects Welcome Entry Fountain & Public Gardens Design and Construction 2004; Reservoir Walkway, Railing, Plantings Study, lead LBA, 2001; Pool Access Redesign, 2002; for Pittsburgh Parks Conservancy, Highland Park Community Development Corporation, Pittsburgh DPW Parks Division, and Design and Construction, award-winning project. Riverview Park Projects Riverview Chapel Shelter Landscape Rehabilitation, 2007; Riverview Interpretive Signs, Pre-Design, 2004; Guidelines for Erosion Control, Trail Repair, Invasive Species Suppression, Vegetation Inventory, 2002; Entry Fountain Project Scoping, 1999; Schenley Park Projects Mary Schenley Fountain Plaza Rehabilitation, 2008; Visitor Center Decorative Iron Railing Fabrication, 2005; Step Masonry Repair, 2004; Panther Hollow Lake Feasibility Study, 2005; Phipps Run Basins & Trail, 2004; Schenley Plaza Peer Review, 2004; Panther Hollow Trail & Drainage Rehabilitation, 2002; Schenley Park Visitor Center Landscape Window on the Park, 2001; Mellon Square Projects Phase 1 Cascade, Terrace, Steps & Storefronts, lead for interdisciplinary team, 2011; Mellon Square Preservation, Interpretation, and Management Plan, 2009; Mellon Park Projects Ann Katharine Seamans Memorial Garden, team lead LBA, 2008; Renaissance Garden Fountain Stone Restoration, 2006; Concrete Steps & Ramp, Asphalt Paving, 2004; Stone Paving, Balustrade & Steps Restoration, 2003, Perimeter Fence & Wall Rehabilitation, 2002; Mellon Park Historic Landscape Report, Preservation & Management Plan, with Charles E. Beveridge, PhD., Barry Hannegan, Tupper Thomas, Susan Rademacher, 2000. Award-winning projects for Pittsburgh Parks Conservancy, Pittsburgh DPW Parks, Phipps Garden Center, Western Pennsylvania Conservancy, R.K. Mellon Foundation and Allegheny Foundation.

Washington, DC Senate Parks, Union Square USBG and Square 575, and Library of Congress grounds, CLRs Heritage Landscapes lead, for Architect of the Capitol, Capitol Square CLR, Vitetta lead, 2009 to 2014; Jefferson Memorial Security Barrier Design, 2010, lead WRT & DHM Design for NPS NAMA and DSC; National Mall Reconstruct Turf & Soils, Phases 1, 2, 3, Mall Walkway Study, National Mall preliminary design and Value Analysis process, lead HOK, 2010 to 2014; 2012; National Mall Mapping Research, Overlays for NEPA and Section 106, 2010, Louis Berger Group IDIQ, for NPS NAMA and DSC. Restore the District of Columbia World War I Memorial, Research, Design, Approvals, 2010, lead Hord Coplan Macht; for NPS NAMA and DSC; Meridian Hill Park NHL implementation projects, lead Mills + Schnoering, 2012 to 2015, for NPS Capital Region.

Louisville, KY Louisville Olmsted Parks and Parkways, F.L. & J.C. Olmsted, Olmsted Brothers, 1891-1940s; Iroquois Park North Overlook, Tetra Tech lead, 2014; Tyler Park Master Plan, Hogan Fountain Master Plan, lead Environs/RLA, 2010; Bicycle Trail Plan, leads HNTB and Gresham Smith, 2007; Cherokee Park Barringer Spring, Barringer Hill Shelter, Drive and Playground, lead, Environs/RLA, PDR Engineers, 2002; Chickasaw Park Master Plan, lead Environs/RLA, 2001; Iroquois Park Amphitheater Rehabilitation Plan, 1999; Louisville Master Plan implementation, 3 projects, Shawnee Courts, Shawnee Parkway and Playing Fields, 1998; Iroquois Burnt Knob Drainage, Cherokee Barringer Hill & Stream, lead PDR Engineers with Andropogon Associates, 1996; Olmsted Parks & Parkways Comprehensive Master and Management Plan, lead Andropogon Associates, Ltd, 1994; for Louisville Olmsted Parks Conservancy and Metro Parks, award-winning projects.

Fort Wayne, IN Ardmore Avenue Construction at Wildwood Park, 2010; Foster, McMillen, Shoaff & Weisser Parks & Rudisill Boulevard, Fort Wayne Parks & Boulevards Cultural Landscape Reports, 2007 for the City of Fort Wayne, Parks & Recreation and Public Works, and the Parks Legacy Committee. Swinney, Memorial, and Lakeside Parks, Swinney, Memorial and Lakeside Parks Cultural Landscape Reports & Treatment Plans, 2002; for Fort Wayne Parks and Recreation and Planning Departments, award-winning projects.

Baltimore MD Baltimore Park System, Crimea Master Plan, Gwynns Falls Leakin Park, 2005; Mount Vernon Place, Design for North Square, 2004, Landscape Rehabilitation Plan, 2003; Patterson Park Extension Walkways Construction Documents, Heart of the Park Interpretation, Fountain Rehabilitation, Pagoda

Heritage Landscapes LLC, Projects List, Page 5

Landscape Rehabilitation, 2000-2004; Druid Hill Park Conservatory & Greenhouses, 2004; Eutaw Place Rehabilitation Plan, 2003; Design for Park Entries for Clifton, Herring Run, Druid Hill and Carroll Parks 2003; Clifton Park, Schematic Design for Pool and Regional Baseball Complex, 2002; Latrobe Park Master Plan, 2001; Carroll Park Master Plan, 2000; Memorial Segregated Pool, Grove 1999; Memorial Tennis Court with Joyce Scott artist, and Kann & Associates, 1998; Druid Hill Park Hydrology & Drainage Study with EBA Engineering, 1996; Renewing Druid Hill Park, Olmsted Brothers 1910s, Master Plan, 1995; for Baltimore Recreation and Parks, Capitol Projects, award-winning project.

Buffalo, NY; Buffalo Olmsted Parks & Parkways, Olmsted, Vaux & Co., 1873-1879, Olmsted, Olmsted & Eliot, 1894-1896; Olmsted Brothers, 1901-1904; South Park Updated Master Plan, lead Trowbridge & Wolf, with Charles Beveridge, PhD., Olmsted historian, 2001; for BOP Conservancy; Southern Parkways Updated Master Plan, Schematic Design and Design Development, lead Trowbridge & Wolf, with Charles Beveridge, PhD., Olmsted historian, 2001, for BOP Conservancy; Delaware Park, Abbreviated Cultural Landscape Report and Reforestation Vegetation Renewal, lead Wendel Duscherer, for BOP Conservancy, 2001; Botanical Gardens Master Plan, South Park, lead Flynn Battaglia Architects, 2000, for Buffalo & Erie County Botanical Gardens Society; Front Park Rehabilitation, Riverside Park Rehabilitation and Delaware Park Bikeway, 1988; for Buffalo Friends of Olmsted Parks, funded NYSCA; Buffalo Olmsted Parks & Parkways System, History & Existing Inventory, O’Donnell, 1979, Western New York Historical Society.

Atlanta, GA Olmsted Linear Parks Druid Hills, landscape preservation consultant for Rehabilitation of Oak Grove Park and Ponce de Leon Parkway Design and Construction, lead Tunnell & Tunnell, with Charles E. Beveridge, PhD, 2000, for Olmsted Linear Parks Alliance, ISTEA funded; Oak Hill implementation plan, lead HOK Atlanta, 1998; Piedmont Park Master Plan, lead EDC-Pickering, 1994; for Piedmont Park Conservancy.

Rochester, NY FL & JC Olmsted, Olmsted, Olmsted & Eliot, Olmsted Brothers, 1891-1912; Carrere and Hastings, 1920s; City Neighborhood Parks Rehabilitation, Phase I, lead Clark Patterson, 1995; Small Parks and Squares: Parks’ History, Preservation Approach, Master Plan and Management Guidelines, lead Clark Patterson Mossien, Engineers, with historian Charles E. Beveridge, PhD., conservator George Wheeler, 1994; for City of Rochester; Highland Park Warner Castle Gardens, Rehabilitation Recommendations, 2003; Seneca Park Parking Lot and Maintenance Center Design and Construction, lead EDR PC, 1998; Seneca Park Trout Pond and Picnic Grove Historic and Ecological Rehabilitation, lead EDR PC, 1996; Seneca Park Parkway Replanting, Storm Damage Vegetation Grant, lead EDR PC, 1994; Genesee Valley Park Deer Park & Picnic Grove Rehabilitation Design and Construction Documents, lead Clark Patterson Mossien Engineers,1995; Cobbs Hill Park Reservoir Radio Communication Facility Design, lead Rose & Associates, and Douglas McCord Associates, 1993; Genesee Valley Park Picnic Area & Carousel, Moore Drive Design and Construction, lead EDR PC, 1992; Highland Park Pinetum Drive Historic Landscape Assessment, with historian Charles E. Beveridge PhD, 1991; Red Creek Bridge Rehabilitation, lead Clark Engineers, 1991; Seneca Park Master Plan Update with Zoo Guidelines, with historian Charles E. Beveridge, PhD. lead EDR PC, 1990; Seneca Park Drive Reconstruction, lead LaBella Engineers, 1989; for Monroe County Parks and Engineering Departments, award-winning projects.

Hartford, CT; Parks System, Jacob Weidenmann, Olmsted, Olmsted & Eliot, Olmsted Brothers, Theodore Wirth, 1854-1910; Hartford Parks Master Plan, with PRE/view, Stuart Sachs, planning/video simulation, David Schuyler, history, Theodore Haskell, maintenance, Christopher Greene, program/finance, and George Wheeler, objects conservation, 1992; for City of Hartford, CT, award-winning project.

Heritage Landscapes LLC, Projects List, Page 6

NATIONAL PARKS & MONUMENTS

Meridian Hill Park, NHL, Washington DC; Phase V, Lower Plaza access and restoration, 2015; Phase 3, High Wall, CLR implementation projects, lead Mills + Schnoering, 2010 to 2014, for NPS Capital Region and DSC.

Bandelier National Monument, NM, Frijoles Canyon Electrical System Design and Construction, Berger lead, 2025; for NPS Denver Service Center.

Jefferson Memorial, Washington, DC; Frederick Law Olmsted, Jr., John Russell Pope, 1940s; Security Barrier Schematic Design and Approvals, Environmental Assessment/Assessment Effects for Section 106 compliance, 2010-2012; lead WRT with DHM Design and Greenhorne & O'Mara, for NPS National Mall & Memorial Parks, and Denver Service Center.

Marie Zimmermann Farm, Pike County, PA; 1910-1973, Marie Zimmermann, Arts & Crafts Designer; Cultural Landscape Report, 2011-2012; Cultural Landscape Assessment, Phase I Landscape Construction, 2000; for National Park Service, Delaware Water Gap National Recreation Area & Middle Delaware National Scenic River.

National Mall, Washington, DC; Pierre Charles L’Enfant 1791, McMillan Commission 1902, F.L. Olmsted Jr. 1930s; Reconstruct Turf & Soils on the National Mall, Phases 1, 2, 3, 2010-14; Mall Walkway Study, 2012; National Mall Preliminary Design and Value Analysis, 2009-10; lead HOK with interdisciplinary team; for NPS National Mall & Memorial Parks, and Denver Service Center.

National Mall, Washington DC; Pierre Charles L’Enfant 1791, McMillan Commission 1901, F.L. Olmsted Jr. 1930s; Mapping Research and Overlays for NEPA and Section 106 compliance, 2010, Louis Berger Group IDIQ, for NPS National Mall & Memorial Parks, and Denver Service Center.

District of Columbia World War 1 Memorial, Washington, DC; Frederick H. Brooke, 1931; Restore the District of Columbia War Memorial, Pre-design through Construction Documents, 2010, lead Hord Coplan Macht, NPS National Mall & Memorial Parks, and Denver Service Center.

Nuttall Mine Access and Interpretation, New River Gorge National River, Nuttallburg, WV, Preliminary Planning and Schematic Design, lead WRT, 2009; for NPS National Capital Region, Denver Service Center.

Camp Hill and Storer College, Harpers Ferry, WV; Cultural Landscape Report, 2009; for Harpers Ferry National Historic Site, in cooperation with the Mather Training Center, Interpretive Design Center, NPS.

Lincoln Cottage, President Lincoln and Soldiers’ Home National Monument, Armed Forces Retirement Home, Washington, DC; Lincoln Family Residency 1863-64; Lincoln Cottage Landscape Interpretation & Visitor Education Center Construction Documents & Administration, LEED Pilot Preservation Project with USGBC, 2007; Lincoln Cottage Historic Landscape Report & Preservation Treatment Plan; lead Hillier Architecture, 2003; for National Trust for Historic Preservation.

Mongaup Interpretive Center, Sullivan County, NY; Cultural Landscape Assessment, 2007; for NPS Upper Delaware Scenic & Recreational River.

Thomas Edison Menlo Park Museum and Memorial, Menlo Park, NJ; 1880s; Strategic & Interpretive Plan, Cultural Landscape Assessment; lead M+S Architects, 2007; for Edison Memorial Tower Corporation.

Heritage Landscapes LLC, Projects List, Page 7

Independence National Historical Park, Philadelphia, PA, Bluestone Paving Value Analysis, 2006, for NPS INHP, NPS Denver Service Center.

Lockwood House Property, Harpers Ferry, WV; Lockwood Property Cultural Landscape Report & Treatment Plan, and Preliminary Design, lead GWWO Architects, 2006; for NPS, Harper’s Ferry National Historical Park, DSC.

Yorktown Village, Yorktown Battlefield, and Moore House, Yorktown, VA; Revolutionary War, Civil War, and early Historic Preservation efforts; Cultural Landscape Inventory Reports, 2003; for Colonial National Historical Park, National Park Service.

Zane Grey National Historic Site, Lackawaxen, PA; Zane Grey Retreat Cultural Landscape Report: Treatment, 1999; landscape preservation consultant for cultural landscape assessment, lead M+S Architects, 1992; for NPS, Upper Delaware Scenic & Recreational River.

Colonial Parkway, Yorktown and Jamestown, VA; 1930-1958, Charles Peterson, Stanley Abbott, NPS Eastern Region Design Team; Colonial Parkway Context History of the American Parkway Movement, National Park Service Design & Historic Preservation Contexts, 1998; Colonial Parkway Cultural Landscape Report, Part I: History, Existing Conditions, Analysis & Significance, with Martha McCartney historian, Andropogon Associates, Urban Engineers, 1997; for NPS Colonial National Historical Park, NPS Philadelphia, award- winning project.

Edison National Historic Site, West Orange, NJ; 1889-1939; Edison Laboratories, Pre-Design Feasibility Study, Glenmont Preliminary Landscape Assessment, lead M+S Architects, 1997; for NPS Edison National Historic Site.

Lincoln Home National Historic Site, Springfield, IL; Lincoln Home Cultural Landscape Report, Phase 1: History, Existing Conditions, Analysis & Context, with Midwestern and Springfield landscape research, with Gary Meisner, contemporary landscape architecture, Urbana Group, historic research, 1997; for Lincoln Home National Historic Site, NPS Midwest Region.

Vanderbilt Mansion National Historic Site, Hyde Park, NY; Dr. David Hosack and André Parmentier, 1828- 1832, and subsequent owners; draft VMNHS CLR Part II: Landscape Preservation Treatment, 1994; VMNHS Cultural Landscape Report Part I: Site History, Existing Conditions, Analysis, 1992; with Cynthia Zaitzevsky, PhD, historian; for the NPS North Atlantic Region and NPR ROVA, award-winning project.

PUBLIC GARDENS & NURSERIES

Bloedel Reserve, Bainbridge Island, WA, 1951 to present; Heritage Landscape Report, 2015 with Jennifer Ott historian, for Bloedel Reserve Heritage Landscape Task Force.

Princeton Nurseries Kingston Site, Kingston, NJ, 1913-1995; Cultural Landscape Report, 2011; for Township of South Brunswick, New Jersey, and New Jersey Historic Trust.

Longwood Gardens, Kennett Square, PA, Pierre S. du Pont, 1906-1954; Longwood Landscape Evolution, Longwood Heritage Management Plan, 2010; lead Lord Cultural Resources, for Longwood Gardens.

Morris County Parks, Morris County, NJ, Bamboo Brook, Frelinghuysen Arboretum, Willowwood Arboretum, Horticultural Strategic Facilities Master Plan, with team of subconsultants, ETM Associates, Phillip

Heritage Landscapes LLC, Projects List, Page 8

Gruszka, Charles Gleaves, Margaret Falk and Keith Bowers, 2006, for Morris County Park Commission, Horticulture and Natural Resources Division, Morris County, New Jersey, 2006

New York Botanical Garden, 19th century Lorillard property, Nathaniel Lord Britton, Director, 1896-1929, Calvert Vaux, Concept Design, 1895, John R. Brinley, Landscape Architect & Engineer, 1895-1931, NYBG Landscape History, illustrated narrative, 2008; Historic Landscape Research, 2006, for New York Botanical Garden, Getty Conservation Grant, Preserve New York grant, and private funding.

Druid Hill Conservatory & Greenhouses, Baltimore, MD, Howard Daniels, 1860, Olmsted Brothers, 1910s; team leader for Druid Hill Conservatory & Greenhouses Interior Rehabilitation, with Sidhu Associates, Kann Associates and Carroll Engineering, 2003 for Baltimore Public Works.

Buffalo & Erie County Botanical Gardens, South Park, Buffalo, NY, Olmsted, Olmsted & Eliot, 1894-1896; Botanical Gardens Master Plan, lead Flynn Battaglia Architects, 2001; for Buffalo & Erie County Botanical Gardens Society.

Kingwood Estate, Mansfield, OH, Pitkin & Mott, 1926; Kingwood Formal Garden Preservation Plan, 2002; Design, construction details, ADA Garden Access and Viewing Path, 2000; Landscape critique and design with horticulture staff, 1998-99; for Kingwood Center.

PUBLIC PARKS

Jackson Park, Chicago, F.L. & J.C. Olmsted, 1890-93 NR listed; Olmsted, Olmsted & Eliot, 1895-97 post- World Columbian Exposition Park Design; Jackson Park Framework Plan; GLFER Olmsted Natural Areas Project, Olmsted character integrated with habitat, collaboration with Army Corps, 2014-2015; for Project 120, Chicago Parks District.

Shawnee Park, Louisville, F.L. & J.C. Olmsted, 1890s, Great Lawn Master Plan and Stormwater Basin siting study, Olmsted experts with Environs Inc, Gresham Smith Partners, lead, 2014; for Metro Sewer District.

Iroquois Park North Overlook, Louisville, F.L. & J.C. Olmsted, 1890s, redesign access and overlook, Tetra Tech lead, Heritage Landscapes Olmsted experts, Storrow Kinsella, landscape architect, for Louisville Metro Parks, 2014.

Tyler Park, Louisville, KY; Olmsted Brothers, 1910s; Master Plan, preservation landscapes architects, 2010; for Louisville Olmsted Parks Conservancy in collaboration with Environs RLA, lead, and Metro Parks.

Hogan Fountain Area of Cherokee Park, Louisville, KY; F.L. & J.C. Olmsted, 1890s; Hogan TeePee Olmsted Park preservation testimony, 2011; Master Plan, preservation landscapes architects, 2010; for Louisville Olmsted Parks Conservancy in collaboration with Environs RLA, lead, and Metro Parks.

Franny Reese Park, Lloyd, Ulster County, NY; Master Plan, Phase 1 and 2 Access and Trail Construction documents, Pouder Design Group, team lead, 2008; for Scenic Hudson, in cooperation with Palisades Interstate Parkway Commission.

Madison Lewis Woodlands, Warwick, NY; Belair Estate, Thomas P. Fowler 1885-1951, Madison Lewis Woodlands Cultural Landscape Report, 2008, for Village of Warwick, Preserve New York Grant.

Frick Park, Pittsburgh, PA, Innocenti & Webel, 1920-1956; Frick Park Environmental Education Center &

Heritage Landscapes LLC, Projects List, Page 9

Outdoor Classrooms, Pre-Design & Estimate 2008; Frick Park EEC Relocation study, lead Biohabitats, 2003; Homewood Entry Landscape Restoration, with LDA Architects for historic gateway building 2000; for the Pittsburgh Parks Conservancy, award-winning project.

Riverview Park, Pittsburgh, PA, 1880s, City of Allegheny, Riverview Chapel Shelter Landscape Rehabilitation, 2007; Riverview Interpretive Signs, Pre-Design, 2004; Guidelines for Erosion Control, Trail Repair, Invasive Species Suppression, Vegetation Inventory, 2002; Entry Fountain Project Scoping, 1999; for the Pittsburgh Parks Conservancy, Student Conservation Association, Partners in Parks, DPW Parks.

Broadway Park, Newburgh, NY; Downing Vaux, Landscape Architect, 1903; Broadway Park Cultural Landscape Report 2007; for City of Newburgh.

Childs Park, Pike County, PA; Childs Park Cultural Landscape Report & Treatment Plan, 2006; for NPS, Delaware Water Gap National Recreation Area, NPS Denver Service Center, award-winning project.

Garfield Park, Indianapolis, IN; George E. Kessler, 1908-1913; Garfield Park Cultural Landscape Report & Treatment Plan, 2004; for Friends of Garfield Park in cooperation with Indy Parks, award winning project.

Highland Park, Pittsburgh, PA; 1870s Reservoir, 1880s Public Park Edward M. Bigelow, Park Superintendent; Welcome Entry Fountain & Public Gardens Design and Construction 2004; Pool Access Redesign, 2002; for Pittsburgh Parks Conservancy, Highland Park Community Development Corporation, Pittsburgh DPW Parks Division, and Design and Construction, award-winning project.

Schenley Park, Pittsburgh, PA; Edward M. Bigelow, Park Superintendent, 1889; Schenley Park Visitor Center Decorative Iron Railing, 2005; Panther Hollow Lake Feasibility Study, 2005; Phipps Run Basins, 2004; Schenley Plaza Peer Review, 2004; Panther Hollow Trail Rehabilitation, 2002; Schenley Park Visitor Center Landscape Rehabilitation, Window on the Park, 2001; for the Pittsburgh Parks Conservancy and Pittsburgh DPW, Parks Division.

Mary Schenley Fountain Landscape, Schenley Park, Pittsburgh, PA, Fountain Landscape Design & Rehabilitation, with Grenald Waldron Lighting, 2008, for the Pittsburgh Parks Conservancy.

Mellon Park, Pittsburgh, PA, Alden & Harlow, Architects, Vitale & Geiffert, Landscape Architects. Olmsted Brothers, 1911-1935; Ann Katharine Seamans Memorial Garden, preservation consultation, team lead LBA, 2008; Renaissance Garden Fountain Stone Restoration, 2006; Concrete Steps & Ramp, Asphalt Paving, 2004; Stone Paving, Balustrade & Steps Restoration, 2003, Perimeter Iron Fence & Wall Rehabilitation, 2002; Mellon Park Historic Landscape Report, Preservation & Management Plan, with Charles E. Beveridge, PhD., Barry Hannegan, Tupper Thomas, Susan Rademacher, Pittsburgh Parks Conservancy, 2000; projects for Phipps Garden Center, Western Pennsylvania Conservancy, R.K. Mellon Foundation, Allegheny Foundation and DPW Parks Bureau.

Westchester County Park, NY, 18th century farms and 19th century Spratt, Hopkins and Willow Brook properties; NYS DOT Design Advisory Document, Construction Documents for Hudson Riverwalk, 2009 lead WSA with BroadReach Planning & Design; Westchester County Preliminary Master Plan, 2004; for Historic Hudson Valley, Lyndhurst NTHP and Westchester County.

Camden Village Green, Camden, ME, Olmsted Brothers, 1926-1950; Honor Roll War Memorial Study, 2004; Planting advice for Camden Green Committee 2002; Camden Village Green Historic Landscape Report, Preservation & Management Plan, 1998; for Camden Garden Club and Town of Camden.

Heritage Landscapes LLC, Projects List, Page 10

Mount Vernon Place, Baltimore, MD, F.L. Olmsted, Sr. 1876-1877, Olmsted Brothers, 1902, Carrère and Hastings, 1917-1919, National Historic Landmark; Mount Vernon Place Landscape Rehabilitation Plan, 2003; for Baltimore Department of Recreation and Parks, Capital Projects.

Warner Castle Gardens, Highland Park, Rochester, NY, Alling Stephen DeForest, 1920s for Merry Dennis; Warner Castle Gardens Rehabilitation Recommendations, 2003; for Monroe County Recreation and Parks.

Patterson Park, Baltimore, MD, historic public walk, Olmsted Brothers, extension 1910s; Extension Entry Rehabilitation Construction Documents, 2004; Fountain Rehabilitation & Heart of the Park interpretation with Mortar & Ink, 2003; Patterson Park Pagoda Landscape Rehabilitation, lead Kann Associates, 2001; for Baltimore Department of Recreation and Parks, Capital Projects.

Clifton Park, Baltimore, MD, early 20th century neighborhood park; Park Entry Design Mayor’s Gateway Program, 2003; Schematic Design for Pool and Regional Baseball Complex, 2002; for Baltimore Department of Recreation and Parks, Capital Projects.

Cherokee Park Barringer Spring, Barringer Hill Shelter, Drive and Playground, lead, Environs/RLA, PDR Engineers, 2002; Volunteer Park, Seattle, WA, Olmsted Brothers, 1910s; landscape preservation consultant for Volunteer Park Seattle Landmark Nomination, lead Sheridan Consulting, 2002; for Seattle Water Department.

Latrobe Park, Baltimore, MD, Olmsted Brothers Landscape Architects, 1904; Latrobe Park Historic Landscape Rehabilitation Plan, 2001; for Baltimore Department of Recreation and Parks, Capital Projects.

South Park, Buffalo, NY, Olmsted, Olmsted & Eliot, 1894-1896; Updated Master Plan, lead Trowbridge & Wolf, with Charles Beveridge, PhD., historian, 2001; for Buffalo Olmsted Parks Conservancy.

Delaware Park, Buffalo, NY, Olmsted, Vaux & Company, Landscape Architects, 1869-1873; Delaware Park Meadow Abbreviated Cultural Landscape Report and Reforestation Vegetation Renewal, lead Wendel, 2001, for Buffalo Olmsted Parks Conservancy.

Chickasaw Park, Louisville, KY, Olmsted Brothers, 1923; Master Plan, lead Environs/RLA with Arleyn Levee, historian, 2001; for the Louisville Olmsted Parks Conservancy and Metro Parks.

Olmsted Linear Parks, Druid Hills, landscape preservation consultant for Rehabilitation of Oak Grove Park and Ponce de Leon Parkway Design and Construction, lead Tunnell & Tunnell, with Charles E. Beveridge, PhD, 2000, for Olmsted Linear Parks Alliance, ISTEA funded; Oak Hill implementation plan, lead HOK Atlanta, 1998; Piedmont Park Master Plan, lead EDC-Pickering, 1994; for Piedmont Park Conservancy.

Carroll Park, Baltimore, MD, Mount Clare Estate, 1767 to 1817, Baltimore Park Commission 1900s, Olmsted Brothers 1910s; Carroll Park Master Plan, 2000; for Baltimore Recreation and Parks, City Planning.

Eldridge R. Johnson Park, Walt Whitman Cultural Arts Center, Camden, NJ, Karcher & Smith, Architects, 1920s; Fountain Rehabilitation & Sculpture Restoration Phase 1, 2000; Johnson Park Historic Landscape Report & Preservation Treatment Plan, with Rebecca Reynolds and Robert Shure, sculpture specialists, for Rutgers University, 1998; for the New Jersey Preservation Trust.

Martin Luther King Jr. Park, Buffalo, NY, Olmsted, Vaux & Company, 1870, Olmsted, Olmsted & Eliot, 1896; Rehabilitation of Wading Basin, lead Trowbridge & Wolf, 2000; Wading Pool & Surrounds, lead Reimann-Buechner Partnership, 1991; Buffalo Community Development.

Heritage Landscapes LLC, Projects List, Page 11

Louisville Olmsted Parks Master Plan implementation, Louisville, KY; F.L. & J.C. Olmsted, Olmsted Brothers, 1891-1940s; Shawnee Courts, Parkway and Playing Fields, 1996-98; Iroquois Burnt Knob Drainage, Cherokee Barringer Hill & Stream, lead PDR Engineers with Andropogon Associates, 1996; for Metro Parks and Louisville Olmsted Parks Conservancy.

Druid Hill Park, Baltimore, MD, Howard Daniels, 1860, Olmsted Brothers, 1910s; Memorial Segregated Pool design and construction, 1999; Memorial Tennis Court, with Joyce Scott artist, and Kann & Associates, 1998; Hydrology & Drainage Study with EBA Engineering, 1996; Maintenance Facilities Plan, with Kann & Associates, 1996; Historic Landscape Report & Master Plan; Renewing Druid Hill Park, 1995 award-winning project; projects for Baltimore Recreation and Parks and Parks & People Foundation.

Piedmont Park, Atlanta, GA, Olmsted Brothers, 1910-1912; landscape preservation consultant for planning and implementation projects; Oak Hill implementation plan, lead HOK Atlanta, 1998; Piedmont Park Master Plan, lead EDC-Pickering, 1994; for Piedmont Park Conservancy and Atlanta Parks & Recreation.

Laurelhurst Park, Portland, OR, Emanuel Tilman Mische, 1890s; Laurelhurst Park Comprehensive Plan for Bond Fund Improvements, landscape preservation consultant, lead Marlene Salon, Landscape Architect, 1996; for Portland Parks.

Untermyer Park, formerly Greystone estate of Samuel Untermyer, Yonkers, NY, William Welles Bosworth, George Chisholm, 1920s; Historic Landscape Report Untermyer Park, 1995; for Department of Parks, Recreation and Conservation, City of Yonkers.

Genesee Valley Park, Rochester, NY, F.L. & J.C. Olmsted, Olmsted Brothers, 1891-1912; landscape preservation consultant for multiple projects with historian Charles E. Beveridge, PhD,. Storm Damage Vegetation Renewal, lead Clark Patterson Mossien, Engineers, PC, Genesee Valley Park Deer Park & Picnic Grove Rehabilitation Design & Construction documents, 1995; Picnic Area & Carousel Plan, Design & Construction documents, lead Environmental Design Research, PC, 1992; Red Creek Bridge Rehabilitation, lead Clark Engineers, 1991; for Monroe County Parks & Engineering.

Seneca Park, Rochester, NY, F.L. & J.C. Olmsted, 1891-1895; Seneca Park Parking Lot Design & Maintenance Center, 1998; Trout Pond and Picnic Grove Historic and Ecological Rehabilitation, 1996; landscape preservation consultant, Storm Damage Vegetation Grant, 1994; Updated Master Plan with Zoo guidelines, with historian Charles E. Beveridge, PhD., 1990, all lead Environmental Design Research, PC; Scenic Entry Drive Reconstruction Project, lead LaBella & Assoc Engineers, with Environmental Design Research, 1990; for Monroe County Parks and Engineering, award-winning projects.

Andrew Jackson Downing Memorial Park, Newburgh, NY, Frederick Law Olmsted Sr. and Calvert Vaux, John Charles Olmsted and Downing Vaux, 1888-1895; Downing Park Comprehensive Master Plan, Belated Honor for a Prophet, History, Existing Conditions & Analysis, Design Guidelines for Built Elements & Furnishings, Vegetation Management & Renewal Guidelines, Management Plan, Guidelines for First Priority Project; with David Schuyler, PhD., historian, 1988-91; for Downing Park Planning Committee, NYSCA grant, award- winning projects.

Washington Park, Albany, NY, Bogart & Cuyler, 1871, William Egerton, 1880-1905; Moses Fountain Planting Plan, 1992; Madison Street Border Planting Plan & Guidelines, 1989; Washington Park Historic Landscape Preservation Plan, joint lead with Joy Kestenbaum, 1989; for Washington Park Conservancy.

Heritage Landscapes LLC, Projects List, Page 12

Norwich Historic Greens, Norwich, CT, Bean Hill Green, Norwichtown Green and Little Plain Green, Historic Landscape Report, Preservation & Management Plan, for City of Norwich, Planning Dept. 1998.

Cobbs Hill Park, Rochester, NY, Olmsted Brothers, 1904-1911, Radio Communication Facility, Olmsted Brothers, 1908-1910, Rose & Associates, architects, Douglas McCord Associates, contemporary landscape architecture, historic landscape consultant, for Monroe County Engineering, 1993.

Pinetum Drive, Highland Park, Rochester, NY, F.L. & J.C. Olmsted, 1890-1894, historic landscape research and analysis, with Charles E. Beveridge, historian, for Monroe County Parks and Engineering, 1991.

Grove Park, Asheville NC, Chauncey Beadle, landscape gardener, 1910, Planting Plan based on 1910 tree and shrub massing, historic landscape planting plan, for Parks & Recreation, City of Asheville, 1991.

Emerald Necklace Parks, Boston, Brookline, MA; FL & JC Olmsted, 1884-1890s and Olmsted Brothers 1910s, Arthur Shurcliff, the Fens, 1920; 1985-1987 Historic Landscape Report and management plan, O’Donnell project manager for Walmsley/Pressley Joint Venture, with Cobham Resource Consultants, George Wheeler, People Places & Design Research; for Massachusetts Department of Environmental Management.

Prospect Park, Brooklyn, NY, Olmsted Vaux & Company 1865-1890; Walmsley & Company, Meadowport Arch Landscape Restoration, Ravine Upper Lakes Reconstruction Planning; Historic Landscape Reports for Lake, Perimeter and Ravine, 1987; for Prospect Park, NYC Parks and Recreation, award-winning projects.

PARKWAYS & BOULEVARDS

Robert Moses Parkway, Niagara Falls, NY; Riverway, Niagara Reservation, Olmsted Vaux and Company, 1887; Riverway Park and Parkway Construction, Hatch Mott MacDonald lead, 2014; Conceptual design and report of parkway for park multi-modal use and character; landscape preservation consultant, lead Hatch Mott McDonald, with Saratoga Associates, Alta Planning, UB Urban Studio, 2009; for New York State Parks.

Louisville Olmsted Parkways, Louisville, KY; Olmsted, Olmsted & Eliot, Olmsted Brothers, 1890-1938; landscape preservation consultant, Louisville Olmsted Parkways Bicycle Trail Plan, leads HNTB and Gresham Smith, 2007; Olmsted Parks & Parkways Comprehensive Master and Management Plan, Louisville Olmsted Parkways History & Guidelines, lead Andropogon Associates, Ltd, 1994; for Louisville Olmsted Parks Conservancy and Metro Parks.

Eutaw Place, Baltimore. MD, 1880s; nine-block neighborhood median and promenade, Phase 1 Rehabilitation Documents, 2003; Eutaw Place Historic Landscape Assessment Report, 2002; for Baltimore Department of Recreation and Parks, Capital Projects.

Palisades Interstate Parkway Trailway, Albany, NY; landscape preservation consultant, research, assessment of landscape character, design guidelines and design review, lead Roesch & Associates, 2001; for New York Department of Transportation, District 8.

Rochester Olmsted Parkways, NY; F.L. Olmsted & Company to Olmsted Brothers, 1892-1909; landscape preservation consultant, Seneca Parkway Storm Recovery Planting, lead Environmental Design Research, 1993; for City of Rochester.

Southern Parkways, Buffalo, NY; Olmsted, Olmsted & Eliot, 1894-1896; Updated Master Plan, Schematic Design and Design Development, lead Trowbridge & Wolf, with Charles Beveridge, PhD., historian, 2001; for Buffalo Olmsted Parks Conservancy.

Heritage Landscapes LLC, Projects List, Page 13

Taconic Parkway, NY, Charles Baker, District #8 Engineering, 1920s-1960s; Taconic Interstate Parkway Corridor Management Plan, with Scenic America/HRA Grey Pape, Lamoreux & Dickenson, Urban Engineers, 1999; for NYS DOT, award-winning project.

Colonial Parkway, Colonial National Historical Park, Yorktown and Jamestown, VA, see National Parks heading above, for NPS Colonial National Historical Park, NPS Philadelphia, award-winning project.

Lake Washington Boulevard, Seattle, WA, Olmsted Brothers, 1902-1914; Walmsley & Company landscape preservation consultant, Lake Washington Boulevard Historic Landscape Report & Preservation Guidelines, 1987, lead EDAW Inc.; for Seattle Department of Parks & Recreation.

HISTORIC SITES, MUSEUMS, ESTATES

Woodstock Festival Grounds, Bethel, NY, site of the 1969 Woodstock Aquarian Age Festival, Cultural Landscape Report, 2014, for The Museum at Bethel Woods, Bethel Woods Center for the Arts.

Fosterfields Living Historical Farm, Morristown, NJ, Joseph Revere Home 1852-1880, Charles Foster Farm 1881-1927; Cultural Landscape Report, 2014; for Morris County Parks Commission.

Shelburne Farms, Shelburne, VT, Dr. Seward and Eliza Vanderbilt Webb, 1887-1936, F.L.& J.C. Olmsted Landscape Architects, 1886-1889; Inn Landscape and Parking Rehabilitation, 2014; Dairy Barn Landscape Rehabilitation, 2012; Pedestrian Path Planning, Construction Oversight, 2011; Farm Barn Triangle Planting Restoration, 2010; Entry and Farm Barn Allées Renewal Replanting, 2008; Southern Tree Allées Renewal Plan, Removals & Replanting, 2007; Shelburne House & Garden Landscape Stewardship Plan, 2006; Breeding Barn Complex Conservation Study, Getty Funded, with SAS Architects, 2004; Shelburne Farms Landscape Stewardship Plan, 2003; Rehabilitation of Coach Barn drives, 2002; support for Long Range Plan Update, 2001; IMLS Conservation Survey, Cultural Landscape, 2000; part of National Historic Landmark nomination 2000, award-winning projects; for Shelburne Farms.

The Breakers, Newport, RI, 1893 to 1899, Cornelius Vanderbilt II, Ernest W. Bowditch landscape architect, James Bowditch, horticulture, Richard Morris Hunt, architect, National Historic Landmark; Historic Landscape Assessment for proposed visitor center, 2013; for Bellevue Ochre Point Neighborhood Association.

Mountain Meadows Massacre, National Historic Landmark, near Veyo, UT, 1857; Cultural Landscape Report, 2013; for the LDS Church, Church History., Church History.

Morven Museum & Garden, Princeton, NJ; 18th century Stockton family property, 20th century New Jersey Governor Mansion, National Historic Landmark; Museum & Garden Pool House Landscape Rehabilitation, 2012; Interpretive Center & Landscape Implementation Plan Approvals, 2011; Morven Museum & Garden Master Plan, 2010; for Historic Morven, Inc.

Tudor Place, Georgetown, Washington, DC, Peter family property, 1800-1970s; Tudor Place Cultural Landscape Report Part 2, 2012; Tudor Place Master Plan, 2002; Tudor Place CLR History, Period Plans 2001, to parallel architectural history William Chambers, Orlando Ridout III; for the Tudor Place Foundation.

Historic Sites Strategic Master Plan, twenty-four church related historic sites dating primarily to the 19th century located throughout the United States, 2012; for the Church of Latter Day Saints.

Priesthood Restoration Site, Harmony, PA, Cultural Landscape Report, with Visitor Experience Plan, 2011; for the Church of Latter Day Saints.

Heritage Landscapes LLC, Projects List, Page 14

Finca Vigía, San Francisco de Paula, Cuba, home of Ernest Hemingway, 1939-1961, cultural landscape assessment and training, 2005 to 2012, for the Cuba-USA Technical Team, sponsors Finca Vigia Foundation and National Trust for Historic Preservation, Cuban Cultural Ministry, and Museo Ernesto Hemingway.

Old Westbury Gardens, Old Westbury, NY; John S. and Margarita Phipps Estate, 1901-1958; George Crawley house design, Grosvenor Atterbury, architect; Jacques Gréber, Rose Standish Nichols, landscape architects; Cultural Landscape Report, Part I, 2009, Part II, 2012; Preserve New York Grant, for Old Westbury Gardens.

Vizcaya, Deering Estate, Biscayne Bay, Miami, FL; Paul Chalfin, Frank Burrall Hoffman, and Diego Suarez, 1910-1925, National Historic Landmark; Cultural Landscape Report, Stewardship & Management Plan, 2011, private funding, for Vizcaya Museum & Gardens & The Vizcayans, Inc.

Cummer Museum & Gardens, Jacksonville, FL; Ninah Cummer, Ossian Simonds, Thomas Meehan & Sons, Ellen Biddle Shipman, Olmsted Brothers, 1903 to 1931; Cultural Landscape Management Plan, 2011; private funding, for The Cummer.

Oatlands Plantation, Loudoun County, VA, 1798, National Historic Landmark; 1821 Carter Barn Project Cultural Landscape Assessment, team lead Li-Saltzman Architects, 2010; for Oatlands, Inc. National Trust for Historic Preservation.

Joseph Smith Birthplace Memorial, Royalton, VT, 1805, Cultural Landscape Report, Historic Landscape Reference Guide; Historic Site Management Plan, 2010, for the LDS Church, Church History..

Formosa, Elisabet Ney Museum, Austin, TX, Elisabet Ney, Sculptor/Owner, 1890s; Formosa Studio Landscape Restoration Implementation Phase 1, 2009; Formosa Cultural Landscape Report Treatment Plan, 2007; Historic Landscape Report: History, Existing Conditions, 1997; partially funded by Save America’s Treasures and National Trust for Historic Preservation, for City of Austin & Ney Museum.

Bamboo Brook, formerly Merchiston Farm, Morristown, NJ, Martha Brooks Hutcheson, 1911-1959; Hutcheson Water System Landscape Reconstruction, Drive and Access, 2009; Tennis Court Masonry, 2006; Coffee Terrace, Gardens and Walls Restoration, 2004; Bamboo Brook Historic Landscape Report, Treatment & Maintenance Plan, 2000; for Morris County Parks Commission, award-winning project.

The Hermitage, Ho-Ho-Kus, NJ; Rosencrantz family home, 1807-1970, William H. Ranlett, architect, DeVisme-Bartow-Prevost-Burr home, 1767-1806; The Hermitage Master Plan; lead M+S Architects, 2009; for the Friends of the Hermitage, Inc.

Longue Vue House and Gardens, New Orleans, LA, property of Edith and Edgar Stern, Ellen Biddle Shipman, Landscape Architect, Caroline Dormon, native Plant Specialist 1936-1949; Garden Renewal Site Review, 2009; Longue Vue Landscape Restoration Plan for Katrina Hurricane Recovery, principal staffing pro-bono with The Garden Conservancy, grant 2007; Wild Garden and Pool Rehabilitation; 1998; Tree Preservation Guidelines, 1997; Longue Vue Historic Landscape Report, 1997 with Neil Odenwald, PhD. and Robin Karson; for Longue Vue Foundation and Waggonner & Ball Architects, award-winning project.

Sunnyside, Tarrytown, NY, Washington Irving, 1835-1859; Sunnyside Parking Lot & Drive Rehabilitation, 2008; Sunnyside Landscape Access & Parking Plan, 2003; Sunnyside Landscape Master Plan, 2001; for Historic Hudson Valley, award-winning project.

Marshlands, Rye, NY, Jay family property, 1745-1891, John R. Brinley, Landscape Architect & Engineer, circa 1910s; Jay Cultural Landscape significance summary; 2008; for the Jay Heritage Center; Marshlands/Jay

Heritage Landscapes LLC, Projects List, Page 15

Property Cultural Landscape Report, Marshlands Conservancy and Jay Heritage Center, 2004; for Westchester County Parks, Conservation & Recreation, award-winning project.

Poplar Forest, Forest, VA, Thomas Jefferson, architect and landscape architect, 1773 to 1823; Facilities Planning Projects, 2011; Entry Redesign, 2008; Lower Field Acquisition & Development Plan, 2005; Implementation Planning Curtilege Fence, Plantation Visitor Route, Core Campus, 2003; Poplar Forest Historic Landscape Schematic Master Plan, 2000; for The Corporation for Jefferson’s Poplar Forest, award- winning project.

Biltmore Estate, Asheville, NC, F.L & J.C. Olmsted Landscape Architects, 1890s, National Historic Landmark; Proposed Visitor Center Concept Planning, 2007; Inn at Biltmore, lead TVS Architects, Design Workshop, Inc., with Charles E. Beveridge, PhD., 1999; for The Biltmore Company, Inc.

Oldfields, Indianapolis Museum of Art, Indianapolis, IN, Olmsted Brothers, Percival Gallagher 1920-1927, National Historic Landscape; Oldfields Interurban Corridor integration, Maintenance & Nursery Center, 2007 with Art & Nature Park team, The Landscape Studio lead; Lilly House Landscape Rehabilitation, 2002 parallel to Hillier Architecture for Lily House; Perimeter Brick Wall Reconstruction, 2000; Ravine Garden Restoration & Hillside Rambles Rehabilitation and fund-raising package, 1998; Oldfields Plan, with HKP Landscape Architects and Bradley Brooks, 1998; Sculpture and Horticulture Study, with Jonathan Fairbanks, Curator, Museum of Fine Arts, Boston, 1997; Woodstock Drive Olmsted design consultation with Horticulture staff, 1996; for Indianapolis Museum of Art, award-winning project.

Montgomery Place, Annadale-on-Hudson, NY, property of the Livingston Family, Andrew Jackson Downing, Landscape Gardener, Andrew Jackson Davis, Architect, 1840s, Violetta Delafield, 20th Century Gardens; Montgomery Place Interpretive Plan & Landscape Rehabilitation Consultation, 2007; partially funded by NEH grant, for Historic Hudson Valley.

Parker Homestead, Borough of Little Silver, NJ, 1667, Cultural Landscape Assessment, Phase I Preservation Master Plan, 2007; lead M+S Architects; for Borough of Little Silver New Jersey.

Tregaron, Washington, DC; The Causeway, Parmalee Estate, Charles Platt with Ellen Biddle Shipman, 1911- 1915, Tregaron, Davies Estate, post-1915; Tregaron Cultural Landscape Report, 2007, for Tregaron Conservancy non-profit; Tregaron Cultural Landscape Assessment, 2005; for Tregaron Limited Partnership.

Garretson Forge & Farm, Fairlawn, NJ; Cultural Landscape Report, for Bergen County Department of Parks, Division of Cultural and Historic Affairs, Farewell Mills Gatsch Architects, Project Lead, 2006.

Shaker Mount Lebanon, North Family, Mount Lebanon, NY, Shaker Community, 1787 to 1947, National Historic Landmark; North Family Mount Lebanon Shaker Village Master Plan, landscape preservation consultant, North Family Mount Lebanon Shaker Village Cultural Landscape Report, 2003; lead Cooper Robertson Architects, for Shaker Museum & Library, Old Chatham, NY, funding Save America’s Treasures.

Village of Southampton public landscape, Parrish Museum, Southampton, NY, Warren Manning, Landscape Architect 1897-1900, Samuel Parrish, Philanthropist, 1897-1932; Historic Landscape Report & Preservation Guidelines, 2002; for Village of Southampton, NYSCA/NYS Preservation League, Preserve New York grant funding.

Heritage Landscapes LLC, Projects List, Page 16

Sotterley Plantation, Hollywood, MD, 1650-1947; Manor House Project 2000; Sotterley Master Plan & Future Use Plan, 2000; Sotterley Cultural Landscape Report, 1999; lead Ann Beha Associates, Architects, for The Sotterley Foundation.

John Hay Estate, Newbury, NH; Renovations to Hay House, Gatehouse, and Landscape, construction documents, 2000; lead RMJM Hillier, for US Fish & Wildlife Service.

Cornelius Low House, Middlesex County Museum, Middlesex, NJ, 1740s; Landscape Rehabilitation & Interpretation, handicap access, 1995; Historic Landscape Treatment Plan, 1995; Historic Landscape Assessment, 1990; lead M+S Architects, for Middlesex County Freeholders.

Lyndhurst, Tarrytown, NY, George Merritt, Jay Gould, Anna Gould Shepard, Owners, Ferdinand Mangold, Estate Gardener, 1863-1905; Cultural Landscape Report Part 2, Living Collections, Analysis and Treatment 1999; HLR Part 1: History, Existing Conditions and Interpretive Brochure; 1993, for Lyndhurst, National Trust for Historic Preservation, award winning project.

Dwight Derby Property, Medfield, MA; Dwight Derby Property Cultural Landscape Report & Treatment Plan, 1999; for Friends of Dwight Derby House, Town of Medfield, Massachusetts Department of Environmental Management.

Eagle's Nest, The Vanderbilt Museum, Mansion, Marine Museum, Planetarium and Park, Centerport, NY; Historic Landscape Report & Preservation Phasing Plan, with Interpretive Tour, 1991; for Vanderbilt Museum, NYSCA grant.

Historic St. Mary's City, MD; 1630s town, Outdoor Museum Planning & Interpretive Development team with Graham Landscape Architecture & American History Workshop, 1994; for Historic St. Mary's City.

Mission San Luis Rey de Francia, San Diego, CA, 1790s; Charette, ASLA Historic Preservation Committee, Patricia M. O'Donnell, principal author, 1990; for ASLA/NPS Symposium, award-winning project. MODERN LANDSCAPES

Mellon Square, Pittsburgh, PA; designed 1947 to 1955, Simonds & Simonds, Mitchell & Ritchey; Phased restoration and terrace new design, lead Heritage Landscapes with Hilbish McGee Lighting, Mortar & ink Graphics, Pfaffman Architects, Atlantic Engineering, Allen & Shariff, and HydroDramatics; opened May 2014; Mellon Square Preservation, Interpretation, and Management Plan, lead Heritage Landscapes with Silman Associates, LaQuatra Bonci, Grenald Waldron, Environmental Design Associates, Marshall Tyler Rausch, 2009; for Pittsburgh Parks Conservancy.

Manitoga National Historic Landmark, Garrison, NY; 1942 to 1974, Russel Wright, Modern Product Designer; Manitoga Historic Landscape Report, 2015, for Manitoga the Russel Wright Design Center, Preserve NY grant funding.

Louis I. Kahn Bath House & Day Camp at the Ewing Senior Community Center, Ewing Township, NJ; 1955- 56, Louis I. Kahn, Architect; Ewing Center Green & Parking Construction, 2011-12; Kahn Bath House & Day Camp at the Ewing Senior Community Center Construction, 2010; Design Development Swimming Pools, 2008; Community Center Master Plan 2008; Kahn Modern Landscape Research & Assessment, 2007; team lead Farewell Mills Gatsch Architects; for Ewing Township and Mercer County.

Heritage Landscapes LLC, Projects List, Page 17

Court Street, New Haven, CT, city urban renewal project, 1960s; Court Street Modernist Landscape Preservation, Management & Interpretation Plan, Phase 1, 2009; for Court Street Association, Elm City Conservancy and City of New Haven.

Graycliff, Derby, NY; Darwin & Isabel Martin Family Summer Retreat, Frank Lloyd Wright, 1927-1930, Ellen Biddle Shipman, 1929-1930, Graycliff Cultural Landscape Report, 2008, for the Graycliff Conservancy.

Bell Laboratories, Holmdel, NJ; Sasaki, Walker and Associates, Landscape Architects, Eero Saarinen, Kevin Roche and John Dinkeloo, Architects 1959, 1966, 1985,; Preservation and Adaptive Use of the Eero Saarinen’s Bell Labs, charette invited participation, April 2008; sponsors NJ AIA, Preservation New Jersey, DOCOMOMO US and NY, NTHP, Recent Past Preservation Network, Cultural Landscape Foundation.

Camden Garden Amphitheatre, Camden, ME, Fletcher Steele, 1928-1931, considered the first modern landscape in America; Fauns Garden Restoration, 2006; Camden Amphitheater Restoration, Phase 1, 2004; Library Grounds & Meadow Rehabilitation, 1999; Historic Landscape Report and Preservation Treatment Plan with Robin Karson and Charles E. Beveridge, PhD., landscape historians, 1997; for Camden Public Library Board and Camden Amphitheatre & Harbor Park Conservancy.

Tirranna, Rayward-Sheperd Property, New Canaan, CT; Frank Lloyd Wright, 1955-56, Taliesin Associated Architects, 1960s, Drive and Arrival Court Landscape Design & Implementation, 2005; Tirranna Landscape Master Plan, 2004, for private owner. CEMETERIES

Forest Lawn Cemetery, Buffalo, NY; 1849-present, early Rural Cemetery design, Adolph Strauch, Joseph Earnshaw, William H. Gratwick III, Ray F. Wyrick; Landscape Renewal Plan, 2011-2012; for The Forest Lawn Group.

Old North Cemetery, Hartford, CT; 1807, rectilinear grid plots, ancient trees, Olmsted family crypt, Frederick Law Olmsted Sr. and Frederick Law Olmsted Jr., Landscape Preservation Master Plan, with Norma Williams, historic research, and Norman Weiss, stones conservation, 2009; for City of Hartford.

Mount Hope Cemetery, Rochester, NY; 1838-present; First municipal Victorian cemetery in US; Cultural Landscape Report, Tree Inventory & Management Plan, lead Wendel, 2009; for City of Rochester, and Friends of Mount Hope Cemetery.

The Evergreens Cemetery, Brooklyn, NY, 1850s attributed to Andrew Jackson Downing, Calvert Vaux, Samuel Parsons; Design for Expanded Mausoleum complex to fit into Historic Cemetery, 2004; for Property Committee, The Evergreens Cemetery.

Prospect Cemetery, Jamaica, Queens, NY; 1660-present; Cemetery Core Rehabilitation, Sacred Places Initiative, 2002; for New York City Landmarks Commission.

Untermyer Plot, Woodlawn Cemetery, Bronx, NY; possible design by William Welles Bosworth for Samuel Untermyer, 1920s; assessment of walls, paving, plantings, sculpture, conservation and maintenance recommendations, phase 1 implementation, 1997; for Untermyer heirs.

Lancaster and Woodward Hill Cemeteries, Lancaster, PA; circa 1849, Victorian burying grounds; Lancaster and Woodward Hill Cemeteries Preservation Needs Assessment & Recommendations, with David Schuyler, historian, 1991; for Historic Preservation Trust of Lancaster County.

Heritage Landscapes LLC, Projects List, Page 18

BATTLEFIELDS & MILITARY SITES

Valley Forge National Historical Park, Overall Park Cultural Landscape Treatment Plan, 2010; George Washington’s Headquarters, Construction Documents for Phases 1 & 2, 2008; Washington Headquarters Cultural Landscape Report & Treatment Plan, 2006; Valley Forge Village, Schematic Landscape Design & Value Analysis, 2006; for NPS VAFO, NPS Denver Service Center.

Yorktown Village, Yorktown Battlefield, and Moore House, Yorktown VA, Revolutionary War, Civil War, see National Parks heading above, for Colonial National Historical Park, NPS Philadelphia.

Morris-Jumel Mansion, Manhattan, NY; George Washington’s Headquarters, 1765-1790, Colonial Revival Landscape, 1894-1935; Morris Jumel Historic Landscape Report 2: Rehabilitation Treatment; 1998; HLR 1: History, Existing Conditions & Analysis, 2000; for the Morris-Jumel Mansion, NYS Preservation League.

West Point Military Academy, West Point, NY; Revolutionary War Redoubts and Earthworks Condition Assessment & Recommendations, 1999; for US Army Corps of Engineers, NY.

Fort Phoenix, Fairhaven, MA, Civil War fortification; Fort Phoenix Historic Landscape Research, Existing Condition, Accessible Walkway & Drainage Project, with Site Maintenance Guidelines, 1999; for the Town of Fairhaven Planning Department, MA, DEM Management grant.

Conanicut Battery on Prospect Hill, Jamestown, RI, Revolutionary War Earthworks; Conanicut Battery Vegetation Management Plan, 1999; Conanicut Battery Historic Landscape Report & Preservation Plan, 1998; for Jamestown Historical Society, Friends of Conanicut Battery, Jamestown Planning, award-winning project.

HISTORIC PRIVATE PROPERTIES

Obercreek Estate, Hughsonville, NY; Mary Rutherford Jay overall design, with Ellen Biddle Shipman garden, 1926-1930; Obercreek Estate Historic Landscape Feasibility Study, with Roslyn Romberg, marketing consultant, 2000; for the Garden Conservancy and private owner.

West St. Mary’s Manor, Dryden, MD; colonial manor house, Alden Hopkins garden, 1940s, landscape master plan and phased implementation to incorporate new addition, 1999.

Ferman-Harris Property, Clinton, NY; 1790s German farmhouse, landscape master plan, 1996.

Rubenstein Second Residence, Norfolk, CT; 1890s country house, landscape master plan, 1996.

Andrews Residence, Greens Farms, CT; Greek Revival House, landscape master plan, garage site plan, construction oversight, landscape management, 1993.

Risell Residence, Ridgefield, CT; Thomas Hyatt House c1835, Colonial style garden with authentic plants and details, historic landscape master plan, and construction oversight, 1991, published in Garden Design, January- February 1991, and Redesigning the American Lawn, 1994.

Emerson Residence, Fairfield, CT; Rural Farmhouse c1810, landscape master plan, 1990.

Wilbur Residence, Southport, CT; Georgian Schoolhouse c1920, landscape master plan, construction, 1993.

Lowenthal Residence, Litchfield, CT; Victorian Home c1870, Historic period landscape design, masonry terrace and garden to integrate privy and outbuilding, 1987.

Heritage Landscapes LLC, Projects List, Page 19

RESUME PETER FRANK VITERETTO, LLA, ASLA

EDUCATION BACHELOR OF SCIENCE, LANDSCAPE DESIGN, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, 1982.

PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE . August 1993-present, SENIOR ASSOCIATE, PROJECT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, Heritage Landscapes, Preservation Landscape Architects & Planners. Senior Associate-in-charge of Connecticut office. Project landscape architect for preservation plans and implementation, managing staff field reconnaissance, digital plans, report and presentation preparation and construction documents, specifications and administration for projects. . February 1990-August 1993, ASSOCIATE, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, Balmori Associates, Inc., Landscape and Urban Design, New Haven, CT. Manager of both office design staff and design projects. Staff leader managing project schedules, staff assignments, proposals and design fees. Managed projects addressing private residences and campus designs to large-scale corporate campuses and institutions. . November 1984-February 1990, ASSOCIATE, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, Cesar Pelli & Associates, Architects, New Haven, CT. Project designer/design team leader, projects addressing pre-schematic, schematic, design development, construction documents, administration and interface of landscape and architectural design. . October 1983-November 1984, LANDSCAPE FOREMAN-DESIGNER, Designs by Lee, Stamford, CT. . March 1983-October 1983, LANDSCAPE FOREMAN, Pound Ridge Nurseries, Inc., Pound Ridge, NY.

SELECTED EXPERIENCE AS PROJECT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT . Library of Congress Cultural Landscape Report, Thomas Jefferson, John Adams and James Madison Building Grounds, Washington DC; for the Architect of the Capitol, 2015 . Union Square, US Botanical Garden, Bartholdi Fountain, and Square 575 Cultural Landscape Report, for Architect of the Capitol, Washington, DC, 2014 . Jackson Park, Framework Plan; GLFER Olmsted Natural Areas Project, collaboration with Army Corps, Chicago, Illinois, for Project 120, Chicago Parks, 2014-2015 . Robert Moses Parkway, South Segment, Phases V-VI: Detailed Design, Landscape and Parkway re-design and construction for multi-modal use and historic character, Niagara Falls. NY, Lead Hatch Mott MacDonald. 2013 . Historic Nauvoo Master Plan: Presentation, Place, Management, for Historic Sites, LDS Church, 2013 . Jefferson' Academical Village, NHL and World Heritage Site, CLR Part 1 Landscape History, Existing, Analysis; with Rivanna Archaeological Services, for Office of the Architect, University of Virginia, 2013 . Tudor Place Cultural Landscape Report Part 2: Recent History, Existing Conditions, Treatment and Management, for The Tudor Place Foundation, Georgetown, Washington, DC, 2011-2012 . Manitoga Historic Landscape Report, for Manitoga, The Russel Wright Design Center, Garrison NY, 2012 . Forest Lawn Cemetery Cultural Landscape Report & Tree Replanting Plan, Buffalo NY, for Forest Lawn Group, 2012 . Morven Museum & Gardens, Landscape Master Plan, Approvals, Poolhouse and Fountain Pool Projects, for Morven, Landscape & Garden Committee, Princeton, NJ, 2009-2012 . Mellon Square, Phases 1 & 2 Restoration & Rehabilitation, Mellon Square Preservation Interpretation &

Heritage Landscapes LLC Preservation Landscape Architects & Planners 501 Lake Road, Charlotte, Vermont 05445 802.425.4330 34 Wall Street, Norwalk, Connecticut 06850 203.852.9966 RESUME PETER F. VITERETTO, ASLA PAGE 2

Management Plan, Pittsburgh Parks Conservancy, PA, 2008-2012 . Louis I. Kahn Bath House & Day Camp Phase 1 Bathhouse & Day Camp, Phase 2 Green & Parking, Master Plan, Landscape Assessment, Ewing Senior & Community Center, team lead Mills + Schnoering Architects, Mercer County, Ewing Township, NJ, 2007-2012 . National Mall and Union Square, Reconstruction of Turf & Soils, Phase 1-2, Walkway Study, lead HOK, National Park Service, National Mall and Memorial Parks, Washington, DC, 2009-2012 . Jefferson Memorial Perimeter Security, co-lead WRT and DHM Design, National Park Service, National Mall and Memorial Parks, Washington, DC, 2009-2012 . Vizcaya, Deering Estate, Paul Chalfin, Frank Burrall Hoffman, and Diego Suarez, 1910-1925, National Historic Landmark; Cultural Landscape Report, Stewardship & Management Plan, private funding, Biscayne Bay, Miami, FL, for Vizcaya Museum & Gardens & The Vizcayans, Inc. , 2011 . West Virginia Capitol Complex Master Plan, Charleston, WV, lead Michael Baker Jr, Inc. RMJM Hillier, Building 3 Landscape Implementation, WV General Services Division, Charleston WV, 2009-2011 . St. Elizabeth’s West Campus, US Homeland Security, Landscape Preservation Plan, Landscape Management Plan, Cultural Landscape Report, Washington, DC, for General Services Administration, 2008-2010 . Pittsburgh Regional Parks Natural Areas Study, lead Biohabitats, Pittsburgh Parks Conservancy, 2010 . Formosa, Elisabet Ney Museum, Comprehensive Landscape Master Plan, Landscape Restoration Phase 1, Elisabet Ney Museum, Austin Department of Public Works, Austin, TX, 2006-2010 . Westchester County Park Master Plan, team lead Wilbur Smith Associates, Historic Hudson Valley, Lyndhurst, National Trust for Historic Preservation, Westchester County Department of Planning, NY, 2008 . Franny Reese State Park, Phase 1 Implementation, Master Plan, lead Pouder Design Group, for Scenic Hudson, Lloyd, NY, 2007-2009 . President Lincoln Cottage & Smith Visitor Education Center, lead RMJM Hillier, Lincoln Cottage Historic Landscape Report, AFRH, lead Hillier Architecture, for National Trust, Washington, DC, 2004-2008 . Virginia Capitol and Capitol Square, Restoration and Renovation, lead RMJM Hillier, Commonwealth of Virginia, Department of General Services, Richmond, VA, 2003-2007 . Poplar Forest Historic Landscape Schematic Master Plan, Phase 1 Implementation, The Corporation for Jefferson's Poplar Forest, VA, 2000-2005 . Highland Park Welcome Entry, Fountain & Gardens Rehabilitation, City of Pittsburgh, Highland Park Community Development Corporation, Pittsburgh Parks Conservancy, PA, 2001-2004 . Renewing Druid Hill Park Phase 1 Conservatory construction, Master Plan, Baltimore General Services, Recreation & Parks, MD, 1994-2004 . Oldfields Landscape Planning Project; Lilly House Landscape Rehabilitation; Ravine Garden Reconstruction; Michigan Street Brick Wall, Sculpture & Horticulture Study, Indianapolis Museum of Art, 1994-2002 . Mellon Park Historic Landscape Preservation & Management Plan, Phases I-3 Implementation, Pittsburgh, PA, Western Pennsylvania Conservancy, Phipps Conservatory, 1999-2002 . Druid Hills Olmsted Linear Parks, Phase I Rehabilitation, Olmsted Linear Parks Alliance, Atlanta, GA, 2000

PROFESSIONAL LICENSE, AWARDS, HONORS, MEMBERSHIPS . Licensed Landscape Architect (LLA), Connecticut, License #565 . Contribution Heritage Landscapes award-winning projects from 1993 to present. . American Society of Landscape Architects, Member . International Council on Monuments & Sites and US/ICOMOS, Member . CT ASLA Representative for the Merritt Parkway Advisory Committee . City of Norwalk, CT Tree Advisory Committee Member . Silvermine Neighborhood Association, Norwalk, CT, Board Member-Landscape Committee Chair

Heritage Landscapes LLC Preservation Landscape Architects & Planners 501 Lake Road, Charlotte, Vermont 05445 802.425.4330 34 Wall Street, Norwalk, Connecticut 06850 203.852.9966

RESUME PATRICIA M. O'DONNELL, FASLA, AICP, ICOMOS, IFLA

EDUCATION . MASTER OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, Concentration behavioral aspects of landscape architecture, emphasis on applied behavioral research, 1982. . MASTER OF URBAN PLANNING, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, Concentration in historic preservation with emphasis on the history, theories and practice of landscape preservation, 1985. . BACHELOR OF SCIENCE IN DESIGN, State University of New York College at Buffalo, Concentration in Environmental Design, 1978.

PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE . 1987-present, PRINCIPAL, FOUNDER, Heritage Landscapes LLC, Preservation Landscape Architects & Planners, completed 500+ planning and implementation projects for cultural landscape, urban heritage and sustainability projects in the USA and internationally to address historic character, community, environment, access, education, interpretation. . 1983-87, ASSOCIATE, Walmsley & Company, Inc. Project Manager for historic parks and community design.

SELECTED CONSULTANT REPORTS & PROJECTS . Library of Congress Cultural Landscape Report, Thomas Jefferson, John Adams and James Madison Building Grounds, Washington DC; for the Architect of the Capitol, 2015 . Jackson Park, Framework Plan; GLFER Olmsted Natural Areas Project, collaboration with Army Corps, Chicago Illinois, for Project 120 Chicago and the Chicago Park District, 2014-2015 . Union Square, US Botanical Garden, Bartholdi Fountain, and Square 575 Cultural Landscape Report, for Architect of the Capitol, Washington, DC, 2014 . Jefferson Memorial, Washington DC: Jefferson Memorial Security, WRT/DHM co-lead, 2009-2013 . National Mall, Turf & Soils Rehabilitation Phases 1-2-3, National Mall Walkway Study, lead HOK Planning 2010- 2014; Mall Mapping 1790s to 2010, Berger contract lead, 2010; NPS NAMA DSC . Capitol Square & Senate Parks Cultural Landscape Reports, Washington DC; with Charles Beveridge, PhD. for Olmsted Design Overview at Capitol Square; with Vitetta, HCM, Faithful & Gould, 2014; Architect of the Capitol . St. Elizabeths West Campus, Washington, DC, Landscape Preservation Plan 2010; Landscape Integration Plan, 2010 w/Andropogon, Landscape Management Plan, 2009; Cultural Landscape Report w/Robinson & Associates, 2007; for GSA

SELECTED PUBLICATIONS . O'Donnell, Patricia M., and Gregory W. De Vries. “Entangled Culture and Nature: Toward a Sustainable Jackson Park in the 21st Century” Change Over Time: An International Journal of Conservation and the Built Environment, Volume 5, forthcoming Fall 2015 . O'Donnell, Patricia M., "Historic Urban Landscape: A New UNESCO Tool for a Sustainable Future," in Conserving Cultural Landscapes: Challenges and New Directions, Taylor Francis, 2014 . O'Donnell, Patricia M., "The Role of Regulatory Systems," in Reconnecting the City: The Historic Urban Landscape Approach and the Future of Urban Heritage, Wiley & Sons, 2014

Heritage Landscapes LLC Preservation Landscape Architects & Planners 501 Lake Road Charlotte, Vermont 05445 802.425.4330 34 Wall Street Norwalk, Connecticut 06850 203.852.9966 RESUME PATRICIA M. O'DONNELL, FASLA, AICP, IFLA, ICOMOS Page 2

. O'Donnell, Patricia M. "An Ascendant Urban Space Restored”, Mellon Square: Discovering a Modern Masterpiece, Princeton Architectural Press, 2014 . Interview with Patricia M. O'Donnell, FASLA, AICP, Principal, Heritage Landscapes, LLC, US Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, January, 2014, http://www.achp.gov/inclusiveness-patricia.html

SELECTED CONSULTANT REPORTS & PROJECTS . Jackson Park, Framework Plan; GLFER Olmsted Natural Areas Project, collaboration with Army Corps, Chicago, Illinois, for Project 120 and Chicago Park District, 2014-2015 . Riverway, Niagara Falls State Park, planning and redesign in Olmsted Vaux original character, Hatch Mott McDonald, team leader, for NYS Parks, 2008-15, under construction 2014-2015 . Library of Congress Cultural Landscape Report, Thomas Jefferson, John Adams and James Madison Building Grounds, Washington DC; for the Architect of the Capitol, 2015 . Intramuros Technical Assistance, Legal and Financial tools and case examples, local identity code, Manila, Philippines, Senior Urban Conservation Expert, The World Bank Social Sector, 2014-15 . Union Square, US Botanical Garden, Bartholdi Square and Square 575 Cultural Landscape Report, Washington DC; for the Architect of the Capitol, 2015 . Mellon Square, Restoration and New Terrace construction, Mellon Square Preservation, Interpretation & Management Plan, 2008, award winning, 2008 to 2014 . Inclusive Urban Revitalization Guidelines for Indian Heritage Cities, O'Donnell, senior urban conservation expert, The World Bank, Social Sector, 2013 . Bhutan Heritage Villages Stewardship Plan framework, Bhutan Heritage Act PSI Assessment, senior urban conservation expert, The World Bank Social Sector, 2013 . Jefferson's Academical Village, NHL and World Heritage Site, CLR Part 1 Landscape History, Existing, Analysis; with Rivanna Archaeological Services, for Office of the Architect, University of Virginia, 2013 . Capitol Square & Senate Parks Cultural Landscape Reports, Washington DC; with Charles Beveridge, PhD. for Olmsted Design Overview at Capitol Square; with Vitetta, for the Architect of the Capitol, 2010-2014 . Defensive City of Viejo San Juan, Puerto Rico, Workshop and reporting on World Heritage extension informed by NHL research, for Puerto Rico Historic Preservation Office, 2012

SELECTED AWARDS, EXPERT MISSIONS . 2015-1987, 74 Professional Awards for Planning and Implementation from National Trust, American Society of Landscape Architects, ASLA Connecticut, Kentucky, Louisiana, Rhode Island and Vermont chapters; Connecticut and Vermont Public Space Programs; Virginia Historic Preservation Award; New York State Preservation League; Pittsburgh History and Landmarks Preservation, Midwest and Mid-Atlantic Construction . 2015-2005 UNESCO Historic Urban Landscape Workshops and Expert Meetings in Edirne, Turkey, Zanzibar, Tanzania, Nanjing, China, Paris, France, Rio de Janiero and Olinda, Brazil, Vienna, Austria. . 2014-2006, ICOMOS Site and Desk Reviews for World Heritage Cultural Landscape Nominations

PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION, SERVICE & AFFILIATIONS . Licensed Landscape Architect, CLARB examination 1987, Connecticut, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Vermont, Virginia, West Virginia . Volunteer Professional leadership contributions to ICOMOS, US/ICOMOS, IFLA, ASLA, APA and other professional organizations.

Heritage Landscapes LLC Preservation Landscape Architects & Planners 501 Lake Road Charlotte, Vermont 05445 802.425.4330 34 Wall Street Norwalk, Connecticut 06850 203.852.9966

Application

00566 - PY42 CDBG

00578 - CDBG Administration

Community Development Block Grant (CDBG)

Status: Under Review

Submitted Date: 11/12/2015 12:32 PM

Primary Contact

Mr. Timothy T. Sheehan Name:* Salutation First Name Middle Name Last Name

Email: [email protected]

Address: 125 East Avenue

Address Line 2 room 202

Address Line 3

Norwalk Connecticut 06851 * City State/Province Postal Code/Zip

203-854-7810 46786 Phone:* Phone Ext.

Fax:

Title: Executive Director

Organization Information

Name: Norwalk Redevelopment Agency obo City of Norwalk

Organization Type: City Government or Agency

Organization Website:

Address: 125 East Avenue, room 202

Address Line 2

Address Line 3 Norwalk Connecticut 06851 City* City State/Province Postal Code/Zip

Phone: 203-854-7810

Ext. 46787

Fax: 203-854-7734

Organization's Staff Capacity

What year was the organization founded? 1950

Number of clients served per year (all programs): 36236

Number of employees (full and part-time): 12

Does the organization have a personnel policy manual with an Yes affirmative action plan and grievance procedure?

Explain your organization's track record with projects of similar scope and scale. If your organization has not implemented a The Agency has administered the City's CDBG project of this scale before, justify why it is equipped to do so funding since Program Year 1 (1975-1976). now. (1400 characters or less)

Household Information Sheet (HIS) Collection

To download the Household Information Sheet (HIS) in English please click here. The PY42 NOFA explains the concept of an "area benefit" project on page 16. To download the PY42 NOFA in English please click here.

To enforce the collection of HUD HIS, the Agency

Organizations receiving CDBG funding are required to obtain a requires the submission of all necessary Household Information Sheet (HIS) from each program documentation before projects may receive final beneficiary (except for projects providing an Area Benefit). reimbursements. The Administration of the CDBG program does not require the collection of HIS.

Public Service Proposals ONLY:

What qualifications and/or training do your service providers have, related to the proposed programming? Please include job title, years of experience, education and minimum qualifications. (1050 characters or less)

Housing, Non-Housing and Public Facilities Proposals ONLY:

What does it mean to manage a facility project financed in part by CDBG funds? This document describes most (but not all) of the required steps in the management process. Please review it carefully and let us know if you have any questions. To download the Subcontract and Facilities Required Tasks list please click here. If you select "Norwalk Redevelopment Agency Staff" to help you manage the project, for $7,500 (not billable to your grant) a staff member will work closely with your organization to successfully accomplish each of these steps.

How do you plan to manage the proposed facility project?

Organization's Financial Capacity

Has the organization received CDBG funding before? Yes

Please provide the organization's 9-digit DUNS number. 22716620 What is your current operating budget? $1,566,336

City Grants for Positions

NRA Grant for City Projects

Please list your organization's top five funding sources and amounts over the past year. (1050 characters or less) CDBG City Neighborhoods

CDBG Administration

City Capital Budget

CDBG financial assistance is provided as a reimbursement for costs already expended. Does your organization have the Yes financial capacity to pay for project/program costs up front?

Totals

Total Cost of Project $1,731,067

Amount of Request $164,731

If after saving this form, the information below does not equal 0.00, then please go back and edit your answers to "Total Cost of Project," "Amount of Request" and/or your budget numbers below so that they are consistent.

Total Cost $0

Total Requested $0

Budget Activity

Awarded Line Item Request Match* In-Kind Total Amount

Personnel $164,731 $0 $0 $164,731 $164,731 Services

Subcontracts (costs associated with architectural designs, $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 engineering, contractors and consultants)

Other (travel, marketing, general $0 $1,566,336 $0 $1,566,336 $0 supplies, etc)

Totals $164,731 $1,566,336 $0 $1,731,067

Sources of Match Funding

(Expected) Source of Match Funds Date Match Funds Row Amount Match Funding Secured? Will be Secured

Source 1 GrantsFederal $576,067 No May 15, 2016

Source 2 GrantsStateLocal $990,269 Yes Agency funds

Source 3 $0

Source 4 $0

Totals $1,566,336

Comments

The amount of this request is subject to change Comments (1040 characters or less) based upon the final amount of the CDBG allocation from HUD.

Housing, Non-Housing and Public Facilities Proposals ONLY:

Project budgets should be based upon recent and responsible construction estimates. "Recent and responsible" estimates are those prepared within the last six months by qualified architects or engineers, rehabilitation or code enforcement specialists, contractors or experienced building managers. **Applicants should be aware that such projects are covered under the Davis-Bacon Act (prevailing wages) and should develop budgets accordingly.**

The recent and responsible estimate should be uploaded in the "Required Attachments" form of this application. All projects selected for funding are required to be publicly bid to determine actual project costs.

Applicants are responsible for obtaining their own architectural and engineering resources.

Any physical development project receiving or expending at least $100,000 in federal funding (including CDBG funding) will be subject to the Section 3 provisions set forth by HUD.

Do you, the applicant organization, understand the above information? (If you have questions, please contact Tim Carney ([email protected]) prior to submitting your application.)

General Project Information - Project Summary

Summary Statement

This statement will be provided to Norwalk's elected officials recommending applications for funding and provided to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) if the proposal is funded. In 700 characters or less, please succinctly describe the proposed activity, including the proposed number of beneficiaries.

The Agency requests $164,731 in PY42 CDBG Project Summary funds to cover costs associated with administration

(700 characters or less) of the City's CDBG program for the 2016-2017 fiscal year.

Collaborative Effort Is this application submitted by a partnership of multiple No organizations?

If yes, then please delineate the role of each partner, identify the organization which will serve as lead administrator and fiduciary of CDBG Program funds, clearly identify the uses of CDBG funds and describe the process for implementing those services provided by the partnership.

(1750 characters or less)

Program / Project Location

What is the geographic target area for your proposed project? Citywide (select one)

The following link may be helpful in identifying your census tract(s). Click here

0425, 0426, 0427, 0428, 0429, 0430, 0431, 0432 (LMI Tract), 0433 (LMI Tract), 0434 (LMI Tract), 0435, 0436, 0437 (LMI Census Tract(s) Tract), 0438 (LMI Tract), 0439, 0440 (LMI Tract), 0441 (LMI Tract), 0442 (LMI Tract), 0443, 0444 (LMI Tract), 0445 (LMI Tract), 0446

125 East Avenue Project Location (street address) room 202

Norwalk Connecticut 6851 * City State Zip

Program / Project Information

Please refer to page 12 in the PY42 NOFA to determine the appropriate funding category. To download the PY42 NOFA in English please click here. Para Espanol, por favor clickea aqui.

Funding Category: Planning and Administration

What is the activity's purpose? (select any/all that apply) None of these

This project / program proposes to assist... N/A

Will the project / program be accessible to persons with Yes disabilities (including visual, speech and aural impairments)?

Will the project / program be accessible to persons with limited Yes English proficiency?

General Project Information - Amounts

General Project Information - Project Inputs

General Project Information - Project Activities

CDBG Project Information

Consistency with the Consolidated Plan (ConPlan)

What Priority Need is addressed by this activity? N/A (Planning/Admin Activities ONLY)

What ConPlan Goal does this activity address? N/A (Planning/Admin Activities ONLY)

The selected Goal Matrix Code Definition should correspond with the identified Priority Need, Goal and Code as illustrated on page 7 of the NOFA. Please refer to "Appendix A: CDBG Matrix Codes" to determine the appropriate Goal Matrix Code Definition for your project.

Fair Housing Activities (subject to Admin cap) (21D), General Program Administration (subject to Admin cap) (21A), Planning What Goal Matrix Code Definition best describes the proposed (subject to Admin cap) (20), Public Information (subject to activity? Admin cap) (21C), Submission of Applications for Federal Programs (subject to Admin cap) (21E)

The selected Matrix Code should correspond with the identified Goal Matrix Code Definition as illustrated on page 7 of the NOFA and defined in Appendix A.

What Matrix Code corresponds to the selected Goal Matrix Code 20, 21A, 21C, 21D, 21E Definition?

Objectives, Accomplishments and Outcomes

National Objective: None - Planning & Admin projects only

Please select the appropriate Accomplishment Type for your activitys identified Matrix Code Definition by referencing Appendix C.

Accomplishment Type: None

Please select the appropriate CDBG Objective Measurement as defined on page 16 of the NOFA. (select one)

Create suitable living environment, Provide decent affordable CDBG Objective Measurement housing, Create economic opportunities

Please select the appropriate CDBG Outcome Measurement as defined on page 16 and 17 of the NOFA. (select one)

CDBG Outcome Measurement Availability/Accessibility, Affordability, Sustainability

Beneficiary Information

Does this activity propose providing an Area Benefit? Yes

Please reference this document when answering the following question regarding the percent of program beneficiaries who are expected to have low or moderate income (LMI).

Percent of Beneficiaries who qualify as LMI (Low/Moderate 51.0% Income)

The project's accomplishment type was identified previously in this application by referencing Appendix C.

Number of Proposed Beneficiaries per the identified 36236 Accomplishment Type:

Dollars per beneficiary $5

Project/Program Implementation Project / Program Implementation Schedule

Please list the 5 most important steps for implementing your project / program and when they would be initiated during the July through June program year. (50 characters or less per step)

Subrecipient orientation, 1st Quarter: July 1 - Step 1* contract execution September 30

1st Quarter: July 1 - September 30, 2nd Quarter: Follow-up on project October 1 - December 31, 3rd Step 2* compliance and status Quarter: January 1 - March 31, 4th Quarter: April 1 - June 30

1st Quarter: July 1 - September 30, 2nd Quarter: Set up and review quarterly October 1 - December 31, 3rd Step 3* reports Quarter: January 1 - March 31, 4th Quarter: April 1 - June 30

Approve and process

Step 4 subrecipient claims

1st Quarter: July 1 - September 30, 2nd Quarter: PY41 CAPER & PY43 NOFA, October 1 - December 31, 3rd Step 5 Application and AAP Quarter: January 1 - March 31, 4th Quarter: April 1 - June 30

How ready are you?

Assuming CDBG funding was in place, how soon could you Ready (could begin in 0-3 months) implement the first step on your list?

How many months do you anticipate the project / program 12 needing/taking from start to finish?

Conflict of Interest Pursuant to Title 24, §570.611 of the Code of Federal Regulations, no persons who exercise any functions or responsibilities with respect to HUD-funded activities, or who are in a position to participate in the decision making process or gain inside information with regard to such activities, may obtain a financial interest or benefit from a HUD-funded activity, or have a financial interest, including compensation, in any contract, subcontract or agreement with respect to a HUD-funded activity, or with respect to the proceeds of a HUD-funded activity, either for themselves or those with whom they have business or immediate family ties, during their tenure or for one year after.

HUD defines family ties as the spouse, parent (including stepparent), child (including stepchild), brother, sister (including stepbrother or stepsister), grandparent, grandchild, and in-laws of a covered person, regardless of whether the relation is by blood, marriage or adoption.

Please select those members of Norwalk's Common Council who may have a conflict of interest with the proposed organization None and/or proposed activity.

The identification of a Council member(s) does not automatically disqualify your application.

Required Attachments Attachment Description File Name File Size Type

REQUIRED: Current NRA IRS Letter Tax IRS Letter 1.0 MB pdf 501(c)3 Certification ID.pdf

REQUIRED: List of NRA Commissioners 1.0 MB pdf Board of Directors Commissioners.pdf

REQUIRED: Minutes NRA minutes from 10-5- NRA MINUTES 10-05- 1.0 MB pdf from last board meeting 15 meeting 15-FINAL.pdf

REQUIRED: Equal Opportunity/Non- Equal Opportunity Non- Equal Opportunity Non- Discrimination 1.0 MB pdf Discrimination Stmt Discrimination Stmt.pdf statement on Agency letterhead

REQUIRED: Statement on Agency letterhead identifying the means by Language Access Plan which your organization Language Access Plan FINAL approved 1.0 MB pdf will serve persons who 3.12.13.pdf are not proficient in English.

REQUIRED: Current Operating Budget lined Operating Budget Operating Budget.pdf 1.0 MB pdf up with Previous Year's Operating Budget

Commitment Letters for Secured Match Funding 1.0 MB (when applicable)

PUBLIC FACILITIES REQUIRED: Recent 1.0 MB and Responsible Project Estimate

PUBLIC FACILITIES REQUIRED: Building 1.0 MB Management Plan

PUBLIC FACILITIES REQUIRED: Two Photos of the Subject 1.0 MB Property (please convert to PDF prior to uploading)

PUBLIC FACILITIES: Owner's Statement of Approval and Contact 1.0 MB Information (when applicable) PUBLIC FACILITIES: Lease for Site of 1.0 MB Renovations (when applicable)

Statement of Agreement

Timothy T. Sheehan 11/09/2015 Signed:* Please type the name Date

Name: Timothy T. Sheehan

Title: Executive Director

Agency/Org: Norwalk Redevelopment Agency obo City of Norwalk

Redevelopment Agency Commissioners Contact Information 2015

Felix R. Serrano, Chairman 391 W. Cedar Street Norwalk, CT 06854 (Home) 203-354-3199 (Cell) 203-354-3131 Email: [email protected]

Business: Guidelight Financial 50 Washington Street, 7th Floor Norwalk, CT 06854

Lori Torrano 104 Dry Hill Road Norwalk, CT 06851 (Home) 203-984-4177 203-847-2940 (Cell) 203-855-7719 Email: [email protected] [email protected]

Lisa Cooper 30 Center Avenue Norwalk, CT 06851 (Home) 203-846-0176 (Cell) 203-904-3604 Email: [email protected]

La Tanya Langley 7 Riverwalk Lane Norwalk, CT 06850 (Home) 203-855-9091 (Cell) 203-858-8363 Email: [email protected]

Thomas E. Devine 5 Sasqua Road Norwalk, CT 06855 203-866-4421 [email protected] CITY OF NORWALK REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY SPECIAL MEETING OCTOBER 5, 2015

ATTENDANCE: Felix R. Serrano, Chairman; Commissioners Lori Torrano, and Tom Devine

AGENCY COUNSEL: Marc Grenier, Esq.

STAFF: Timothy T. Sheehan, Executive Director; Elizabeth Stocker, Director of Economic Development

OTHERS: Planning Committee Chair Douglas Hempstead, Members Bruce Kimmel, John Kydes, Shannon O’Toole-Giandurco, Sharon Stewart, Travis Simms; Council Members David McCarthy and John Igneri; Doug Adams, Sr. Director GGP, Larry Cafero, Esq., and others

CALL TO ORDER The meeting of the Norwalk Redevelopment Agency was called to order at 6:37 P.M by Chairman Serrano. He noted that a quorum was present.

The meeting of the Council Planning Committee was then called to order by Chairman Hempstead.

PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PROPOSED MODIFICATION OF THE REED PUTNAM URBAN RENEWAL PLAN

Mr. Sheehan said the Urban Renewal Plan for the Reed Putnam area was initially approved in 1983 and most recently modified in 2007, which brought it into a mixed use development of 1.1 million square feet of Class A office. Since the last revision, there have been significant changes dealing with legislative changes, market shifts and completed infrastructure improvements which this modification seeks to record. The scope of the revisions are primarily on the remaining undeveloped parcels 1, 2 and 4. The goals and objectives of the URP modification are to advance mixed use development by requiring a minimum of three land uses in any project considered for the site, enhance public access and project connections by capitalizing on completed public infrastructure improvements, increase affordable housing opportunities, recognize the importance of the Preservation Zone and improve the plan’s design guidelines.

The components of the URP plan modification include infrastructure mitigation and control, land use and controls, and urban design guidelines and regulations on development. The purpose of the design guidelines is to define the qualities of architecture, urban design and public space that will make for a successful project and to serve as a tool for guiding the project towards meeting those expectations. The design guidelines are intended to provide clarity and focus on what is important to consider in the design process from the City’s perspective, provide performance based statements as to what is valued by the City with regards to design, provide the basis for efficient and effective design review dialogue with the developer, and to provide the common element from which fair and consistent design review recommendations can be made.

Johanne Horvath, 1 Cobbler’s Lane, said at a public hearing on September 15th, Attorney Cafero stated “Bloomingdale’s wants to have a direct access to the parking lot adjacent to its store,” which she totally agrees with. She said she walks with a cane and would not want any parking spaces near the store deleted. She is in favor of modifying the Urban Renewal Plan and bringing the plan forward.

Missy Conrad, 37 Stonecrop Road, said she is very much in favor of the housing that was supposed to have been on the site, but they have apparently made their decision that they are not in favor of the housing and have removed it from the site at the 11th hour. She is very disappointed with that decision as she just doesn’t think they can lose these opportunities. People’s homes have been taken and that was bad government. They are supposed to be doing better government and including people.

Mr. Sheehan said housing is allowed under the Urban Renewal Plan as a use and it also requires that there be an affordable component to that housing use. The developer has chosen three land uses that don’t include housing and those three land uses have been approved by the Redevelopment Agency and the Common Council, which is the requirement.

Ms. Conrad said another issue is the amount of water that is used by a hotel, and water is just so valuable. She asked if the project had been approved by the sewage treatment plant. She repeated that she is not happy with the timing nor the determination not to allocate money for affordable housing someplace else.

Mr. Hempstead said, just to be clear, there is nothing here at the eleventh hour. The options the developer chose were voted on back in March. It could have been housing or a hotel and they chose the hotel. That was passed by the Council and it was passed by the Redevelopment Agency in March, so that has always been part of the plan because they said they had no interest in building housing.

Doug Adams, Senior Director of General Growth Properties, said the Urban Renewal Plan is an important document, particularly with respect to design guidelines. The design guidelines they are requesting changes to are for parcels 1, 2 and 4 only and deal mainly with bulking and massing in order to accommodate the concept master site plan and allow the proposed project to move forward. There were 24 original areas of concern in the CMSP, and they feel they have addressed all of those. There are a couple that are truly problematic for them. They understood the sensitivity of massing over North Water from the very beginning and have worked very hard to reduce it, but it is to the point now that they are at the minimum they can agree to and still have a project that delivers on their promises for Class A anchors and a Class A development.

There was a lot of discussion regarding public realm, and GGP is completely in agreement to bring the required public realm use to the project. They ask that they be given the flexibility to look at different areas and see whether they can be enclosed or shielded or they can put other aspects into it to make it acceptable. The Agency has made some excellent suggestions as to other spaces that they fully intend to look at as they move through the process.

2 They understand that the slip ramp has been moved to the design phase and is not applicable to the concept plan. He thanked the Agency and the Planning Committee members and members of the Council for their time and consideration.

Sallie Marsico said with the intensity of elections taking place less than a month from now, there is an understandable sense of pressure to move forward so as not lose what has been gained and an understandable eagerness to get on with it. She has never witnessed such a well intentioned public body, and every member of the Planning Committee and the Agency has done their best to grasp aspects of the project that were presented to them, generously donating their time and attentiveness to the process. Questions were posed by every member of the Committee, but in the end there were not enough questions asked, not because the members couldn’t or wouldn’t ask them, but because they didn’t know to ask them as there simply was not enough prior informed experience on the committee to address the full complement of issues associated with a mall project of this magnitude, and until an oversight committee includes people who are more familiar with the design and nuances of a regional mall, the project is going to proceed with some glaring flaws.

Larry Cafero, 6 Weed Avenue, said housing was one of the options that the developer could have chosen for this particular site, but they chose retail, a hotel and public realm, which was done in studying not only the City, but the district within which the project is to be built. In the proposal that was put forth by the Spinnaker Group, there were approximately 235 housing units planned for this area, 15% of which needed to be affordable. Obviously, that project never took off, but there has been a change since then because right up the street in the Waypointe project, there are 500 to 800 units planned, 15% or more to be considered affordable, in addition to what is being planned for the Head of the Harbor project, so there is actually more affordable housing under the current plan than there was in 2007.

He would also point out that people need to have an income to afford housing, which is an aspect that GGP has taken very seriously by putting forth a project that hopes to create thousands of jobs in the City of Norwalk, and that is why the LDA includes a 5-year commitment by GGP to provide career and job training for the purposes of having a local work force that can be employed should the project get built.

Chairman Serrano asked if there were any other comments. Hearing none, the Public Hearing was closed.

ADJOURNMENT There being no further Old or New Business, the Norwalk Redevelopment Agency meeting was adjourned at 7:11 P.M.

Respectfully submitted,

Karen Pacchiana

3

Language Access Plan

City of Norwalk, Connecticut Approved March 12, 2013

0 Language Access Plan

I. Introduction/Statement of Purpose A. Many individuals living in Norwalk, Connecticut read, write, speak and understand English. There are many individuals, however, for whom English is not their primary language and who have limited English proficiency. Individuals who are “limited English proficient” (LEP) are so on account of their national origin, and are therefore unable to read, write, speak or understand the English language effectively. Based on 2005-2009 American Community Survey (ACS) data from the U.S. Census Bureau, approximately 14.6% of Norwalk’s population can be considered LEP. The five most commonly spoken languages among Norwalk’s LEP population are: Spanish (10.6%), Greek (0.8%), Italian (0.6%), French (0.5%), French-Creole (0.4%); herein referred to as the “targeted languages.” B. In order to further the public safety, health, convenience, comfort, property and general welfare of all of Norwalk’s citizens, the City of Norwalk has written a Language Access Plan (LAP) to establish the standards and procedures for providing language assistance to LEP persons. Although compliance with the LAP is the responsibility of all City departments, the Language Access Coordinator will oversee its implementation and monitor its effectiveness. Each department shall have a Language Access Captain, the Department head or his/her nominee, who is responsible for reporting information to the Language Access Coordinator and disseminating information from the Language Access Coordinator to departmental employees.

II. Identifying LEP Individuals Who Need Language Assistance A. In order to provide accurate language assistance to individuals with limited English proficiency (LEP), it is necessary to identify who those people are, and what language they prefer using. 1. The City of Norwalk shall provide Language Identification Cards to each department for LEP customers to use to declare their preferred language. 2. City offices keeping personal records on individuals shall include in their documentation the individual’s preferred language, whether it is English, or another. 3. Notices shall be posted in common areas, and included on documents and brochures which indicate the free availability of language assistance. This will encourage LEP persons to self-identify their needs, so that the City can make arrangements for language services to be provided.

III. Ways in which Language Assistance Is Provided A. The reasonable provision of language assistance is the responsibility of the City, rather than the LEP customer. Assistance shall be provided in response to oral and written requests. Available services are listed in the Language Resource Guide provided to each City department, which should be referred to when assisting an LEP customer. B. Provision of Oral Language (interpretation) Services: 1. Staff members working with in-person customers (herein referred to as the “primary staff member”) needing assistance, shall identify the language of the customer by using the Language Identification Card available in the Language Resource Guide.

1 a. Once the preferred language is identified, the primary staff member will display a card asking the customer to please wait while appropriate language assistance is obtained. b. The primary staff member will obtain assistance from a bilingual staff member in the immediate department. c. When a bilingual staff member is not available or able to provide sufficient support, the primary staff member will consult the Language Resource Guide for names of City staff members who are bilingual in the preferred language and then, if necessary, call upon one of the listed individuals or community organizations willing to provide volunteer assistance. d. If those resources are insufficient, the primary staff member shall use the Language Line phone service to provide appropriate language assistance to the LEP customer. 2. Staff members working with LEP customers over the phone shall identify the language of the caller by using the phonetic script available in the Language Resource Guide. a. Once the preferred language is determined, the primary staff member will continue using the phonetic script to ask the caller to hold while assistance is obtained from a bilingual staff member in the immediate department. b. When a bilingual staff member is not available or able to provide sufficient support, the primary staff member will consult the Language Resource Guide for names of City staff members who are bilingual in the preferred language and request their assistance. c. If sufficient assistance is not able to be provided, the primary staff member will use the phonetic script in the Language Resource Guide to collect the caller’s name and phone number. The primary staff member shall be responsible for arranging appropriate interpretation services and following up with the customer within a reasonable time-frame, no more than 24 working hours after the contact was made. 3. Oral language services for public meetings or hearings shall be requested at least forty-eight hours in advance of the meeting or hearing for which they are needed. a. Instructions for requesting such assistance shall be included in legal notices of hearings and posted on the City’s calendar or agenda webpages. b. The procedure for obtaining such services is as follows: i. The LEP person requesting assistance shall visit or call the office coordinating the hearing, in keeping with the instructions provided with the meeting’s notice. This contact shall be handled by the primary staff member in the manner listed above for in-person and/or telephone contacts. ii. Upon receipt of the request, email notification shall be sent to the Department’s Language Access Captain, who will keep record of the request. iii. The primary staff member shall request oral assistance for the event in the order of: a) A bilingual staff member of the department holding the meeting/hearing.

2 b) A bilingual staff member of a different city department. c) A bilingual person from a community organizations and/or volunteer listed in the Language Resource Guide. d) If no staff member or community organization/volunteer is available to attend the meeting, the primary staff member shall arrange for a Language Line on-site interpreter to be available. c. Following a meeting/hearing with language assistance provided, the primary contact shall document the use of language assistance with the department Captain. 4. Oral language assistance shall be provided in a specific order of preference: a. The preferred method of assisting LEP customers shall be the use of competent bilingual staff of the department contacted for in-person and telephone interpreting. i. When an in-department staff member is not available, a bilingual staff member from a different department will be contacted. The Language Resource Guide provides a listing of suitable staff members. b. If a City staff member is unavailable, the Language Resource Guide shall be used to identify a suitable community organization or individual who can provide assistance. c. If sufficient assistance is not able to be provided, City staff shall seek assistance from a professional telephone interpreter, as identified in the Language Resource Guide. d. While City policy does not actively encourage the use of informal interpreters such as family, friends of the LEP person or other customers, informal interpreters may be used if suggested by the customer. The usage of minor children as interpreters shall be generally discouraged and should be used only upon insistence of the customer and with approval of a supervisor, or in emergencies where no alternative is available. e. Telephone interpreters (including staff interpreters) shall not be a preferred method of assisting with in-person contacts and shall be used only if in-person interpreters are unavailable or requesting their presence is impractical given time constraints or expected length of conversation. f. Staff shall be authorized to procure language services when deemed necessary, even when such assistance is not requested or desired by the customer. g. No staff shall suggest or require an LEP customer to provide an interpreter in order to receive services. C. Provision of Written Language Services: 1. Critical documents are defined to be those which are critical to the health, safety and/or welfare. 2. The following procedure shall guide the translation of written materials produced by the City of Norwalk. a. Template documents (internal and external) will be translated upon request. b. Critically important documents will be translated upon request. c. Critically important template documents (forms and applications) will continue to be proactively translated into Spanish, and will be translated upon request into another language.

3 d. The City’s website content will be able to be translated by any user into one of 65 available languages, including each of the target languages, using Haitian- Creole for French-Creole. 3. The preferred means of translating written documents shall be mindful of the costs associated with translation, the timeliness of obtaining professional translations and the need for accurate translations. a. Critical, template documents shall be proactively and professionally translated into Spanish and into other languages upon request. b. Other template documents shall be translated using technological resources such as Google Translate, Babylon and Reference.com, upon request. i. Whenever possible, bilingual staff or volunteers shall be asked to provide a quality check to ensure information contained in electronically-translated materials is accurately translated and can be understood by the reader c. All non-template documents shall be translated upon request using technological resources such as Google Translate, Babylon and Reference.com. i. Whenever possible, bilingual staff or volunteers shall be asked to provide a quality check to ensure information contained in electronically-translated materials is accurately translated and can be understood by the reader. d. If written translations are unavailable, and at the discretion of the primary staff member or his/her supervisor, oral interpretation of written documents can be requested of (in order of preference): i. A department staff member ii. An out of department staff member D. Interpreters and translators shall be initially evaluated and continuously monitored for quality of service provided. 1. Bilingual staff must pass a proficiency test administered by an impartial party fluent in the foreign language spoken by staff, and be internally monitored for effectiveness, after receiving training in providing interpretation and translation. If at anytime a staff member is determined to be ineffective, his/her name will be removed from the Language Resource Guide’s list of bilingual staff members. 2. Community organizations and volunteers must pass a proficiency test administered by an impartial party fluent in the language in which interpretation/translation services would be provided. If at anytime an approved organization or volunteer is determined to be ineffective, it will be removed from the Language Resource Guide’s list of approved community organizations and volunteers. 3. Membership in the American Translators Association is the preferred indicator of a professional interpreter or translator’s level of competence.

IV. Training Staff A. City of Norwalk employees shall receive training on effective and efficient provision of language assistance services to LEP persons. This training is developed, coordinated and evaluated by the Personnel department and the Language Access Coordinator. B. Employees shall be trained in several manners: 1. Ongoing Training: a. Annual email to all Language Access Captains with the following information, to be distributed to department staff:

4 i. Summarization of language services provided ii. Provision of necessary technical advice iii. Update and dissemination of the Language Resource Guide 2. One-time Training: a. New employee orientation b. Interpreting skills training session for identified bilingual staff c. Staff hired prior to the publication of this plan, who routinely interact with the public in the provision of services, shall receive training in 2013. C. Training topics shall be expanded and/or continued as appropriate and may include: 1. Education on Title VI of the Civil Rights Act and the legal responsibility to provide meaningful access of government services to non-English speakers. 2. General information about LEP policies, both federal and local 3. Review of Norwalk’s Language Access Plan (LAP) and Language Resource Guide, which specifies the procedures for providing language assistance 4. Differences in interpreting and translating 5. Education on how to effectively work with an interpreter 6. Reporting requirements and procedures of the staff to the Language Access Captains and Language Access Coordinator D. Bilingual staff shall have additional training on how to use their skills to effectively interpret and/or translate.

V. Providing Notice to LEP Persons of Services Available (and free of charge) A. The City of Norwalk shall make significant effort to insure LEP persons are aware of their right to free language assistance, and how language assistance can be accessed. These methods of providing notice shall include, but are not limited to: 1. Information about the right to free language assistance and how it can be accessed shall be provided upon adoption of this plan via: a. Notification to community organizations associated with LEP persons b. Signage in common areas, offices and where applications are taken, with statements in target languages providing access information i. “Do you need an interpreter?” ii. “Do you need a document translated?” iii. Regarding the right to language assistance, how it can be accessed and how to file a complaint 2. Instructions for requesting language assistance at public hearings and meetings shall be included in English in legal notices and posted on the City’s calendar or agenda webpages. 3. Internal and external template forms shall include notice in the targeted languages that the document can be translated upon request. 4. A multilingual tag line shall be added to all critical documents produced in English, informing the customer that the City will provide language assistance upon request. 5. Mailings shall include a tagline or an insert informing recipients of available language assistance. 6. The Language Access Plan (LAP) shall be available on the city’s website via the Human Relations page and by contacting the Language Access Coordinator.

5 VI. Goals of the Language Access Plan A. Through implementation of the LAP and vigilance in the area of equal access to resources, Norwalk hopes to develop stronger relationships with persons of limited English proficiency. In addition, the City of Norwalk shall establish as goals for itself and its citizens: 1. To develop agreements with community organizations and volunteers willing and able to provide language assistance 2. To provide meaningful access to all city programs and services. 3. To increase the number of resources available in target languages, with an emphasis on Spanish, the language most commonly spoken by LEP residents of Norwalk 4. For the municipal administrating agencies to support sub-recipients of any federal funding to the City, such as CDBG, in the development of their own Four Factor Analyses and LAP’s 5. To fully support the efforts of the Language Access Coordinator

VII. Administration of the Language Access Plan A. In order to insure the continued effectiveness of the Language Access Plan, the document and its contents shall be monitored and evaluated. This will be the responsibility of the Language Access Coordinator, assisted by the departmental Language Access Captains. 1. Questions, concerns or complaints regarding the provision of language assistance shall be brought to the attention of the Language Access Coordinator. a. Complaints should be submitted in writing to the Language Access Coordinator and should include the name, address and phone number of the person bringing the complaint (or their authorized representative); a description of the incident or action, the place and date of its occurrence, the name of person or persons who witnessed or were adversely affected, and the name of any employee or representative of the City of Norwalk involved. i. Assistance in filing complaints will be provided upon request by the Language Access Coordinator. ii. The complaint should be submitted to the Language Access Coordinator as soon as possible within 30 calendar days of the incident or action. b. Within 15 calendar days of receipt of the complaint, the Language Access Coordinator will meet with the complainant to clarify the facts of the incident and discuss possible resolutions. c. Within 15 calendar days after the meeting, the Language Access Coordinator will respond in writing to the complainant explaining the position of the City of Norwalk and present options for substantive resolution of the complaint. d. If the Language Access Coordinator’s response does not satisfactorily resolve the issue, the complainant may appeal the Coordinator’s decision within 15 calendar days of its receipt to the Corporation Counsel. e. Within 15 calendar days of receipt of the appeal, the Corporation Counsel, or his/her designee, will meet with the complainant to further clarify the complaint and discuss possible resolutions. f. Within 15 calendar days of the meeting, a response will be presented in writing to the complainant explaining the final resolution of the complaint.

6 g. All complaints received by the Language Access Coordinator, appeals to the Corporation Counsel and responses/resolutions shall be kept on file for at least three years. 2. The use of language assistance resources shall be assessed annually by: a. The completion of a data collection form by each department’s Language Access Captain and submitted to the Language Access Coordinator detailing: i. Feedback on LEP interactions (name, language, date, type of service provided, provider of services and perceived customer satisfaction) ii. Documents translated by the department (name, language, date, reason for translating, type of document, nature of document, type of translation and provider of services) iii. Bilingual Employee listing (name, language, phone number, approved abilities) iv. Record of Complaints (number received) b. Informal feedback from LEP persons and Language Access Captains on ways in which the LAP can be improved, specifically in the provision of services and notification of rights 3. An annual review of the City’s LAP by the Language Access Coordinator shall include: a. A review of procedures b. Adjustments made to the plan based upon the changing needs of Norwalk’s LEP population c. An evaluation of technology available to assist in the provision of language assistance d. A review and update to the Language Resource Guide e. An evaluation of goal completion and, if necessary, the establishment of new goals 4. Compliance with the LAP shall be reviewed and reported to the Human Relations Commission by the Language Access Coordinator. This report shall include: a. Compilation of the data submitted by each Language Access Captain b. Feedback on ways in which the LAP can be improved, specifically in the provision of services and notification of rights c. Attendance or proof of completion of training sessions for City employees d. A summary of any complaints and/or grievances received by the Language Access Coordinator. B. The Language Resource Guide shall be a working document available to all City departments and employees and among other things, shall include: 1. The Role and Responsibilities of the Language Access Coordinator and Language Access Captains 2. Procedural Flow Charts for Providing Language Assistance a. Oral Language Services: In-Person b. Oral Language Services: Over the Phone c. Oral Language Services: Public Hearings/Meetings d. Written Language Services: Translation of Written Materials e. Filing a Complaint with the Language Access Coordinator 3. Documents to be Used in the Notification of Services Available

7 a. Sign: Regarding the right to language assistance, how it can be obtained and how to file a complaint, to be posted in common areas, offices and where applications are taken b. Sign: “Do you need an interpreter?” c. Taglines: “This document will be translated upon request. Please call… or visit our office for assistance. d. Template mailing inserts informing recipients of available language assistance e. Template instructions for requesting language assistance at a public meeting/hearing 4. Documents to be Used in Providing Language Assistance a. Language Identification Card b. Phonetic Script to Identify the Language of LEP Phone Customers c. Translated Card: “Please wait while appropriate language assistance is obtained.” d. Phonetic Scripts: “Please wait while appropriate language assistance is obtained.” e. Translated Form to Collect the Contact Information of an In-Person LEP Customer f. Phonetic Script to Collect the Contact Information of an LEP Phone Customer g. Translated Card: “How to file a complaint regarding language assistance services” 5. Listing, by language, of Approved Resources a. Bilingual city employees b. Community organizations and volunteers c. Professional language assistance providers d. Technical Resources e. Language Line information 6. Listing, by department, of all documents translated into another language 7. Copies of Training Information 8. Copies of Data Collection Forms C. The City of Norwalk’s Language Access Coordinator is: Name: Adam D. Bovilsky Title: Director, Human Relations and Fair Rent Department, City of Norwalk Address: 125 East Avenue, Room 125; Norwalk, CT 06856-5125 Phone: 203-854-7989 Email: [email protected] Fax: 203-854-7767

8