Nont Arget Effects of the Mosquito Larvicides

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Nont Arget Effects of the Mosquito Larvicides NONTARGET EFFECTS OF THE MOSQUITO LARVICIDES, TEMEPHOS AND METHOPRENE, AT BOMBAY HOOK AND PRIME HOOK NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGES Publication No. CBFO-C98-01 Study No. 5N15 Prepared by: Alfred E. Pinkney' Peter C. McGowan 1 Daniel R. Murphy1 Donald W. Sparling2 T. Peter Lowe2 Leonard C. Ferrington3 Under supervision of: Robert J. Pennington, Branch Chief John P. Wolflin, Supervisor U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service1 Chesapeake Bay Field Office 177 Admiral Cochrane Drive Annapolis, MD 21401 U.S. Geological Survey2 Patuxent Wildlife Reseach Center 11510 American Holly Drive Laurel, MD 20708 University of Kansas3 Department of Entomology 2041 Constant A venue Lawrence, KS 66047-2906 •·· December 1998 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is currently evaluating the environmental hazards associated with mosquito management on National Wildlife Refuges (NWRs). The goal is to ensure that mosquito management procedures are compatible with the objectives and operation of the Refuges. The objective of the studies described in this report was to examine the nontarget impacts of two larvicides, temephos [O,O'-(thiodi-4,1-phenylene) 0,0,0' ,O'-tetramethyl phosphorothioate)] and methoprene (isopropyl [2E,4E,7S]-11-methoxy-3,7,11-trimethyl-2,4-dodecadienoate). These chemicals have been used to control mosquito breeding at Bombay Hook and Prime Hook NWRs in Delaware. The salt marshes of both refuges have been sprayed with temephos and methoprene. The freshwater and slightly saline impoundments at Bombay Hook have been sprayed with methoprene. Temephos was used at the Prime Hook impoundments, but since 1995, only methoprene has been used. Temephos is most commonly applied as Abate 4E, an emulsified concentrate ( 44.6% active ingredient), at an application rate of 1.5 o:z/acre (0.048 lb a.i./acre = 0.054 kg a.i./hectare). Methoprene is applied as Altosid Liquid Larvicide (5% a.i.) at a rate of 3 o:z/acre (0.01 lb a.i./acre = 0.011 kg a.i./ha). Airplanes and, to a lesser extent, helicopters are used for spraying, which is done by the Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control (DNREC), Division of Fish and Wildlife, Mosquito Control Section. Six test plots (approximately 170 x 170 m) were established on the salt marsh at Bombay Hook NWR. In 1994, three were randomly assigned to be sprayed with Abate 4E at 0.054 kg a.i./ha and three were controls. Spraying occurred four times, roughly four weeks apart, beginning in early July. Populations of marsh fiddler crabs (Uca pugnax) were monitored by counting the number of burrow holes in areas along tidal guts. A significant linear association was established between the number of holes and number of crabs. Half of the areas were covered with bird netting so that sub lethal toxic effects, which could increase the crabs' susceptibility to predation, could be monitored. There were no statistically significant differences in the number of holes ( or crabs) in sprayed vs. unsprayed plots or between covered vs. uncovered areas. In situ bioassays were conducted with caged juvenile fiddler crabs on sprayed and unsprayed plots. Survival in the bioassay was significantly reduced (16% lower) in the sprayed vs. control plots. Temephos concentrations decreased rapidly in water whereas degradation was slower in sediments. The mechanism of action for temephos, an organophosphate pesticide, is through inhibition of cholinesterase enzymes, which are vital for the transmission of nerve impulses. Inhibition of cholinesterase activity is also used as an indicator of exposure and response in nontarget organisms. In 1995, red-jointed fiddler crabs (Uca minax) were collected from areas that were operationally sprayed with Abate 4E before and after spraying and from an unsprayed area. The post-spray median AChE activity in the enlarged claw muscle of the males ( 1.3 7 µmoles per minute per gram tissue) was significantly lower than the median activity of the pooled prespray and control area crabs (1.90 µmoles per minute per gram tissue). A 28% inhibition was calculated against this pooled median. In 1995, the same plots were reassigned randomly and half were sprayed with Altosid at 0.011 kg a.i./ha. Fiddler crab reproductive potential was analyzed by determining the percentage of females that were gravid in spray and control plots. There was no statistically significant difference in the percentage of gravid females captured at spray and control plots. In situ bioassays with coffee bean snails (Melampus bidentatus) did not result in significant differences in survival at spray and control plots. Meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus) were collected before and after the temephos spraying in 1994. There was no significant difference in acetylcholinesterase (AChE) activity. In 1995, due to concerns about possible reduced bird use of a sprayed impoundment at Prime Hook NWR, a monitoring program was established in which refuge biologists harvested emerging insects weekly from June through August. Two ponds were monitored -- pond PMH4a, an oligohaline tidally influenced natural pond, and pond PMH3d, a freshwater, stream fed natural pond. PMH4a was last sprayed with Abate in 1994 by DNREC. During the 1995 monitoring period this pond was treated with Bacillus thuringiensis israeleasis (Bti). Pond PMH3d had been last sprayed in 1993 (with Abate). Dipterans comprised the vast majority of the individuals collected from both ponds. The mean species diversity index (Shannon's H') was higher in pond PMH3d than in pond PMH4a; this difference was of borderline statistical significance (t-test, p=0.058). There was a significantly greater species equitability in pond PMH3d than in pond PMH4a (p=0.04). Factors such as salinity, depth, and organic content of the sediments, as well as spray history may have contributed to the observed differences. In order to examine the effects of mosquito spraying on freshwater habitats using a statistically rigorous design, three groups of six experimental ponds at Patuxent Wildlife Research Center were randomly assigned to be sprayed with either Abate 4E (at 1.5 oz active ingredient/acre), Altosid (at 3 oz/acre), or distilled water. Spraying was conducted by pumping water through a garden hose attached to a venturi sprayer containing either stock solutions of the pesticides or distilled water. Spraying occurred on May 23, June 14, and July 6, with the three week interval corresponding to an environmentally realistic spraying schedule. The emergence of adult insects was monitored before and after each spray by placing two floating traps in each pond. Traps were allowed to collect insects for 7 days and were harvested on the day before each spray and 13-14 days post-spray. Hester-Dendy artificial substrates were placed in the ponds on May 19 and harvested on July 19. Identification was to the lowest practical taxon. Repeated measures ANOV A was used for the emergence trap data and one way ANOVA for the Hester-Dendy data. In all of the ponds, there was an initial decrease in numbers of emerging insects followed by a gradual increase and dominance by Collembola (springtails). At several periods during the monitoring, there were statistically significant decreases in the mean numbers of individuals, species, and families in the Abate ponds relative to the control. There were statistically 11 significant decreases in species diversity and equitability in the Abate ponds relative to the control ponds. Certain taxa -- Chaoborus, Chironomidae, Odonata, Ephemeroptera -- appeared to be particularly sensitive to Abate and had significantly lower abundances. Mayflies (Ephemeroptera) were affected most dramatically. Only one emerged from the Abate ponds, compared to 195 ·from the Altosid ponds and 264 from the control ponds. With the artificial substrates, there were significant decreases in species diversity, equitability, Chironomidae, and Ephemeroptera in the Abate ponds relative to the controls. In 1995, the effects of Abate and Altosid on tadpoles were tested in the experimental ponds and in the laboratory. The pond tests were conducted coincident with the insect monitoring described above. On June 12, 13 very young(< 2 days old) or 8 older (7 - 10 days old) gray treefrog (Hy/a versicolor) tadpoles were placed into each of two plastic containers within each pond. The containers were screened to allow food (algae) and water to enter freely but block predators. On July 13, the containers were removed and the weights of surviving tadpoles was determined. There were no significant differences in mortality or mean weight of the younger tadpoles. The mean weight of the older tadpoles was 0.56 mg in the controls, 0.34 mg in the Altosid ponds, and 0.26 mg in the Abate ponds (a significant decrease). The median lethal concentration of Abate and its effects on cholinesterase activity in green frog (Rana clamitans) tadpoles were determined. The LC50 was 4.24 parts per million as temephos, which was about two orders of magnitude greater than the concentration measured in the ponds shortly after spray. The activity of butyrlcholinesterase (BChE), expressed as percent of control value, declined precipitously with increasing concentrations of Abate. In contrast, AChE activity increased with increasing concentrations of Abate. Further investigation is needed to resolve these divergent responses. During the growing season of 1997, Abate 4E andAltosid were sprayed on the experimental ponds in a similar manner as in 1995. In late August and early September, the ponds were sampled for metamorphing southern leopard frogs (Rana utricularia). Preliminary analyses showed that juvenile frogs collected from the Altosid-sprayed_ponds had a higher frequency of deformities than those from control ponds (p=0.025). The most common deformities included missing or partially missing hind limbs, but there were also missing eyes and demelanization resulting in a pale tan coloration. No amphibians captured from Abate-sprayed ponds had deformities but the catch per unit effort was significantly decreased in these ponds relative to Altosid or control ponds.
Recommended publications
  • Global Insecticide Use for Vector-Borne Disease Control
    WHO/CDS/NTD/WHOPES/GCDPP/2007.2 GLOBAL INSECTICIDE USE FOR VECTOR-BORNE DISEASE CONTROL M. Zaim & P. Jambulingam DEPARTMENT OF CONTROL OF NEGLECTED TROPICAL DISEASES (NTD) WHO PESTICIDE EVALUATION SCHEME (WHOPES) First edition, 2002 Second edition, 2004 Third edition, 2007 © World Health Organization 2007 All rights reserved. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the World Health Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Dotted lines on maps represent approximate border lines for which there may not yet be full agreement. The mention of specific companies or of certain manufacturers’ products does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by the World Health Organization in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. Errors and omissions excepted, the names of proprietary products are distinguished by initial capital letters. All reasonable precautions have been taken by the World Health Organization to verify the information contained in this publication. However, the published material is being distributed without warranty of any kind, either express or implied. The responsibility for the interpretation and use of the material lies with the reader. In no event shall the World Health Organization be liable for damages arising from its use. The named authors alone are responsible for the views expressed in this publication. CONTENTS Page Acknowledgements i Introduction 1 Collection of information 2 Data analysis and observations on reporting 3 All uses in vector control 6 Malaria vector control 22 Dengue vector control 38 Chagas disease vector control 48 Leishmaniasis vector control 52 Other vector-borne disease control 56 Selected insecticides – DDT 58 Selected insecticides – Insect growth regulators 60 Selected insecticides – Bacterial larvicides 62 Country examples 64 Annex 1.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 5,152,096 Rudolph 45 Date of Patent: Oct
    III USOO5152096A United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 5,152,096 Rudolph 45 Date of Patent: Oct. 6, 1992 (54) BAIT STATION (56) References Cited (75) Inventor: Robin R. Rudolph, Grain Prairie, U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS Tex. 3,972,993 8/1976 Kobayashi et al................ 43/124 X 4,793,093 12/1988 Gentile ............................... 43/132.1 (73) Assignee: Sandoz Ltd., Basel, Switzerland 4,999,346 3/1991 Rudolph .............................. 514/120 21 Appl. No.: 808,054 5,057,316 10/1991 Gunner et al. ................. 43/132.1 X 22 Filed: Dec. 12, 1991 Primary Examiner-Richard K. Seidel Assistant Examiner-Patty E. Hong Related U.S. Application Data Attorney, Agent, or Firm-Allen E. Norris 63 Continuation of Ser. No. 713,480, Jun. 11, 1991, aban 57) ABSTRACT doned. A bait station device for the control of ants, especially (51) Int. Cl. ............................................... A0M 1/20 of Pharaoh's or Sugar Ant. (52 U.S. C. ......................................... 43/131; 43/124 58) Field of Search ....................... 43/124, 131, 132.1 5 Claims, 1 Drawing Sheet U.S. Patent Oct. 6, 1992 5,152,096 DSN a- 5,152,096 1. 2 enting the ants with a combination of an insect growth BAIT STATION regulant (IGR) bait and insecticide bait in such a way that the worker ants have to forage their way through This is a continuation of application Ser. No. the IGR bait to reach the insecticide bait. 07/713,480, filed Jun. 11, 1991, now abandoned. 5 In this way foraging worker ants will transport back The present invention concerns a bait station device to nests for feeding of the colony IGR bait and upon for the control of ants, especially of Pharaoh's or Sugar exhausting the available IGR bait will themselves ingest Ant.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Journal of Pharmaceutical, Biological and Chemical Sciences
    ISSN: 0975-8585 Research Journal of Pharmaceutical, Biological and Chemical Sciences Risk Alleviation Of Pesticides In Agriculture: From History To Analytical Techniques. Jojiya Grace George, and Aneesh TP*. Amrita School of Pharmacy, Amrita University, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham,AIMS Health Sciences Campus, Kochi, Kerala, India. ABSTRACT Population explosion leads to the exploitation of agricultural field to meet the supply of food products (mainly vegetables and fruits). Before first century onwards the usage of pesticide was started to promote the growth of food products and in the present, biotechnological strategies are adopted for pest control along with synthetic pesticides. The demand for maximization of productivity is achieved by the application of synthetic pesticides. Apart from its benefits, its misuse predominates and generates serious consequences. The categorization of pesticides can be done according to their source, mode of action, nature of pest and also on their chemical nature. Excessive and inappropriate usage of pesticides undoubtfully leads to poisoning and various instances of pesticide poisoning are being reported every year. These incidences of pesticide poisoning tragedy include Endosulphan poisoning, Tragedy of Tauccamarca, Seveso disaster etc. These pesticides create serious health hazards ranging from short term effects like vomiting to long term effects including cancer and neurological problems. Analytical laboratories contribute for reducing its intensity to humans and to environment through preliminary screening techniques and comprehensive screening procedures like HPLC, LCMS, GC and GCMS. These are efficient and powerful methods of pesticide determination in vegetables and fruits. The scenario of pesticide usage is complex and hence, care has to be taken by the government and public to lower its usage and to promote environmental stability and social health.
    [Show full text]
  • Lysinibacillus Sphaericus Strain Ot4b.31
    Standards in Genomic Sciences (2013) 9:42-56 DOI:10.4056/sigs.4227894 Genome sequence and description of the heavy metal tolerant bacterium Lysinibacillus sphaericus strain OT4b.31 Tito David Peña-Montenegro, and Jenny Dussán* Centro de Investigaciones Microbiológicas – CIMIC, Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia *Correspondence: [email protected] Keywords: Lysinibacillus sphaericus OT4b.31, DNA homology, de novo assembly, heavy metal tolerance, Sip1A coleopteran toxin Lysinibacillus sphaericus strain OT4b.31 is a native Colombian strain having no larvicidal activi- ty against Culex quinquefasciatus and is widely applied in the bioremediation of heavy-metal polluted environments. Strain OT4b.31 was placed between DNA homology groups III and IV. By gap-filling and alignment steps, we propose a 4,096,672 bp chromosomal scaffold. The whole genome (consisting of 4,856,302 bp long, 94 contigs and 4,846 predicted protein- coding sequences) revealed differences in comparison to the L. sphaericus C3-41 genome, such as syntenial relationships, prophages and putative mosquitocidal toxins. Sphaericolysin B354, the coleopteran toxin Sip1A and heavy metal resistance clusters from nik, ars, czc, cop, chr, czr and cad operons were identified. Lysinibacillus sphaericus OT4b.31 has applications not only in bioremediation efforts, but also in the biological control of agricultural pests. Introduction Biological control of vector-borne diseases, such have been reported as potential metal as dengue and malaria, and agricultural pests have bioremediators. Strain CBAM5 is resistant to arse- been an issue of special concern in the recent nic, up to 200 mM, and contains the arsenate years. Since Kellen et al. [1] first described reductase gene [15].
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Perspectives on Apple Production: Fruit Tree Pest Management, Regulation and New Insecticidal Chemistries
    Historical Perspectives on Apple Production: Fruit Tree Pest Management, Regulation and New Insecticidal Chemistries. Peter Jentsch Extension Associate Department of Entomology Cornell University's Hudson Valley Lab 3357 Rt. 9W; PO box 727 Highland, NY 12528 email: [email protected] Phone 845-691-7151 Mobile: 845-417-7465 http://www.nysaes.cornell.edu/ent/faculty/jentsch/ 2 Historical Perspectives on Fruit Production: Fruit Tree Pest Management, Regulation and New Chemistries. by Peter Jentsch I. Historical Use of Pesticides in Apple Production Overview of Apple Production and Pest Management Prior to 1940 Synthetic Pesticide Development and Use II. Influences Changing the Pest Management Profile in Apple Production Chemical Residues in Early Insect Management Historical Chemical Regulation Recent Regulation Developments Changing Pest Management Food Quality Protection Act of 1996 The Science Behind The Methodology Pesticide Revisions – Requirements For New Registrations III. Resistance of Insect Pests to Insecticides Resistance Pest Management Strategies IV. Reduced Risk Chemistries: New Modes of Action and the Insecticide Treadmill Fermentation Microbial Products Bt’s, Abamectins, Spinosads Juvenile Hormone Analogs Formamidines, Juvenile Hormone Analogs And Mimics Insect Growth Regulators Azadirachtin, Thiadiazine Neonicotinyls Major Reduced Risk Materials: Carboxamides, Carboxylic Acid Esters, Granulosis Viruses, Diphenyloxazolines, Insecticidal Soaps, Benzoyl Urea Growth Regulators, Tetronic Acids, Oxadiazenes , Particle Films, Phenoxypyrazoles, Pyridazinones, Spinosads, Tetrazines , Organotins, Quinolines. 3 I Historical Use of Pesticides in Apple Production Overview of Apple Production and Pest Management Prior to 1940 The apple has a rather ominous origin. Its inception is framed in the biblical text regarding the genesis of mankind. The backdrop appears to be the turbulent setting of what many scholars believe to be present day Iraq.
    [Show full text]
  • Liste Des Pesticides
    Pesticides azotés Atrazine Hexazinone Terbutylazine Terbumeton-déséthyl Terbutylazine-déséthyl Amétryne Cyromazine Clofentezine Metribuzine Prometryne Pymetrozine Terbumeton Prometon Secbumeton Terbutryne Methoprotryne Simazine Simetryne Cyanazine Atrazine-déisopropyl Pesticides organochlorés Methoxychlore Chlorothalonil Quintozène (pentachloronitrobenzène) 2,4' DDD 2,4' DDE 4,4' DDD 4,4' DDE 4,4' DDT Aldrine Dicofol Dieldrine Endosulfan alpha Endosulfan béta Endosulfan sulfate Endrine HCB (hexachlorobenzène) HCH alpha HCH béta HCH delta Heptachlore Heptachlore époxyde Lindane (HCH gamma) Tetradifon Nitrofen Mirex Tolclofos-méthyl Dicloran 2,4' DDT Folpel (folpet) Somme des heptachlore et heptachlore epoxyde Chlordane cis (alpha) Chlordane cis (alpha) Oxychlordane Tecnazene HCH epsilon Chlorthal-diméthyl (DCPA méthyl ester) Pentachlorobenzène Isodrine Chloroneb Chlorbenzide Chlorobenzilate Endrine cétone Nonachlor trans Chlordane gamma 4,4'-dichlorobenzophénone Endosulfan-éther Heptachlore epoxyde exo Pentachlorobenzonitrile Nonachlor cis 4,4'-méthoxychlore oléfine Perthane Heptachlore epoxyde endo Somme quintozène+PCA (exprimée en quintozène) Pesticides organophosphorés Carbophénothion Chlorfenvinphos Chlorpyriphos éthyl Chlorpyriphos méthyl Diazinon Dichlorvos Disulfoton Ethion Ethoprophos Fenitrothion Fenthion Fonofos Formothion Isazofos Isofenphos Malathion Methidathion Mevinphos Parathion éthyl Parathion méthyl Phorate Phosalone Pyrimiphos méthyl Profenofos Pyrazophos Quinalphos Terbufos Tetrachlorvinphos Etrimfos EPN Fenamiphos Mecarbam
    [Show full text]
  • Liquid Larvicide Concentrate
    Alt osid LIQUID LARVICIDE CONCENTRATE PREVENTS ADULT MOSQUITO EMERGENCE (including those which may transmit West Nile virus, Zika, chikungunya and dengue) For control of mosquito larvae using ULV application If in eyes • Hold eye open and rinse slowly and gently with water for 15–20 minutes. • Remove contact lenses, if present, after the first 5 minutes, then continue rinsing ACTIVE INGREDIENT: eye. (S)-Methoprene (CAS #65733-16-6) .............20% If on skin or clothing • Take off contaminated clothing. OTHER INGREDIENTS: ...............................80% • Rinse skin immediately with plenty of water for 15–20 TOTAL: ....................................................100% minutes. Have the product container or label with you when Formulation contains 1.72 lb/gal (205.2 g/liter) active ingredient calling a poison control center or doctor, or going for EPA REG. NO. 2724-446 EPA EST. NO. 2724-TX-1 treatment. You may also contact 1-800-248-7763 for emergency medical treatment information. KEEP OUT OF REACH OF CHILDREN ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS CAUTION Do not contaminate water when disposing of rinsate or SEE ADDITIONAL PRECAUTIONARY STATEMENTS equipment washwaters. BECAUSE OF THE UNIQUE MODE OF ACTION OF DIRECTIONS FOR USE A.L.L., SUCCESSFUL USE REQUIRES FAMILIARITY WITH It is a violation of Federal Law to use this product in a SPECIAL TECHNIQUES FOR APPLICATION TIMING AND manner inconsistent with its labeling. TREATMENT EVALUATION. SEE GUIDE TO PRODUCT MIXING AND HANDLING INSTRUCTIONS APPLICATION OR CONSULT LOCAL MOSQUITO 1. SHAKE WELL BEFORE USING. Zoëcon® Altosid® Liquid ABATEMENT AGENCY. Larvicide Concentrate (A.L.L.) may separate on standing PRECAUTIONARY STATEMENTS and must be thoroughly agitated prior to dilution.
    [Show full text]
  • Con Fundamento En Los Artículos 32 Bis, 34, 35 Y 39 De La Ley Orgánica
    SECRETARÍA DE MEDIO AMBIENTE Y RECURSOS NATURALES SECRETARÍA DE ECONOMÍA SECRETARÍA DE AGRICULTURA Y DESARROLLO RURAL SECRETARÍA DE SALUD Con fundamento en los artículos 32 Bis, 34, 35 y 39 de la Ley Orgánica de la Administración Pública Federal; 4o., fracción III, 5o., fracción III, 15, fracción VI, 16, fracción VI, 17 y 20 de la Ley de Comercio Exterior; 142, 144 segundo párrafo y 153 de la Ley General del Equilibrio Ecológico y la Protección al Ambiente; 3o., fracción XXII, 17 bis, 283, 284, 285, 289, 298, 368 y 375, fracción VIII de la Ley General de Salud; 9, fracciones III y IV de la Ley Federal para el Control de Sustancias Químicas Susceptibles de Desvío para la Fabricación de Armas Químicas; 5, fracción XVII del Reglamento Interior de la Secretaría de Economía; 2, apartado C, fracción X y 7, fracción XVI del Reglamento Interior de la Secretaría de Salud; 1 y 3, fracciones I, VII y XI del Reglamento de la Comisión Federal para la Protección contra Riesgos Sanitarios; 3 fracciones I, II y III y 24 al 38 del Reglamento en Materia de Registros, Autorizaciones de Importación y Exportación y Certificados de Exportación de Plaguicidas, Nutrientes Vegetales y Sustancias y Materiales Tóxicos o Peligrosos, y 3o., fracción III del Reglamento Interior de la Comisión Intersecretarial para el Control del Proceso y Uso de Plaguicidas, Fertilizantes y Sustancias Tóxicas, y CONSIDERANDO Que el 26 de junio de 1945, el Gobierno de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos suscribió la Carta de las Naciones Unidas por la que se creó la Organización de las Naciones Unidas (ONU), instrumento que fue aprobado por el Senado de la República el 5 de octubre de 1945 y publicado en el Diario Oficial de la Federación el día 17 del mismo mes y año.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Indoxacarb and Fipronil (S)-Methoprene Topical Spot-On
    Dryden et al. Parasites & Vectors 2013, 6:366 http://www.parasitesandvectors.com/content/6/1/366 RESEARCH Open Access Evaluation of indoxacarb and fipronil (s)-methoprene topical spot-on formulations to control flea populations in naturally infested dogs and cats in private residences in Tampa FL. USA Michael W Dryden1*, Patricia A Payne1, Vicki Smith1, Monica Chwala1, Emery Jones1, Jacob Davenport1, Gabrielle Fadl1, Maria F Martinez-Perez de Zeiders1, Kathleen Heaney2, Pamela Ford2 and Fangshi Sun2 Abstract Background: A study was conducted to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of two different spot-on topical flea products to control flea infestations on naturally infested dogs and cats in Tampa, FL USA. Methods: Thirty-two dogs and 3 cats with natural flea infestations living in 18 homes were treated topically with a 19.53% w/w spot-on formulation of indoxacarb. Another thirty dogs and 2 cats living in 19 different homes were treated topically with either fipronil (9.8% w/w)/(s)-methoprene (8.89% w/w) or fipronil (9.8% w/w)/(s)-methoprene (11.8% w/w), respectively. All products were applied according to label directions by study investigators on day 0 and again between days 28 and 30. Flea populations on pets were assessed using visual area counts and premise flea infestations were assessed using intermittent-light flea traps on days 0, 7, 14, 21, 28–30, 40–45, and 54–60. Results: A single application of the indoxacarb or fipronil (s)-methoprene formulations reduced flea populations on pets by 97.8% and 85.5%, respectively within 7 days.
    [Show full text]
  • Liquid Larvicide
    Alt osid LIQUID LARVICIDE MOSQUITO GROWTH REGULATOR PREVENTS ADULT MOSQUITO EMERGENCE (Including those which may transmit West Nile virus, Zika, chikungunya and dengue) For control of mosquito larvae using ULV application ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS Do not contaminate water when disposing of equipment washwaters or rinsate. DIRECTIONS FOR USE ACTIVE INGREDIENT: It is a violation of Federal Law to use this product in a (S)-Methoprene (CAS #65733-16-6) ..................... 5% manner inconsistent with its labeling. OTHER INGREDIENTS: ..................................... 95% TOTAL: .......................................................... 100% CHEMIGATION Refer to supplemental labeling entitled “Guide to Product Formulation contains 0.43 lb/gal (51.3 g/liter) active ingredient Application” for use directions for chemigation. Do not EPA REG. NO. 2724-392 EPA EST. NO. 2724-TX-1 apply this product through any irrigation system unless the supplemental labeling on chemigation is followed. KEEP OUT OF REACH OF CHILDREN MIXING AND HANDLING INSTRUCTIONS 1. SHAKE WELL BEFORE USING. Zoëcon® Altosid® Liquid CAUTION Larvicide Mosquito Growth Regulator (A.L.L.) may SEE ADDITIONAL PRECAUTIONARY STATEMENTS separate on standing and must be thoroughly agitated BECAUSE OF THE UNIQUE MODE OF ACTION OF prior to dilution. A.L.L., SUCCESSFUL USE REQUIRES FAMILIARITY WITH 2. Do not mix with oil; use clean equipment. SPECIAL TECHNIQUES FOR APPLICATION TIMING AND 3. Partially fill spray tank with water; then add the labeled TREATMENT EVALUATION. SEE GUIDE TO PRODUCT amount of A.L.L., agitate and complete filling. Mild APPLICATION OR CONSULT LOCAL MOSQUITO agitation during application is desirable. ABATEMENT AGENCY. 4. Use spray solution within 48 hours; always agitate before spraying. PRECAUTIONARY STATEMENTS – HAZARDS TO HUMANS – CAUTION APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS Causes moderate eye irritation.
    [Show full text]
  • WHO VBC 80.766 Eng.Pdf (‎1.320
    5E:e Ai::>b ./ /fj S€f>ARAT£ t=".::.c..·l:::.c--Q WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION ~ WHO/VBC/80.766 VBC/BCDS/80.09 ORGANISATION MONDIALE DE LA SANTE ENGLISH ONLY DATA SHEET ON THE BIOLOGICAL CONTROL AGENT(l) INDEXED Romanomermis culicivorax (Ross and Smith 1976) Romanomermis culicivorax is an obligatory endoparasitic nematode, the parasitic larvae of which develop inside larval mosquitos. It has little genus and species specificity within the Culicidae faplily. A total of 87 species (including Anopheles stephensi, An. albimanus, An. gambiae and many other vector species) have been exposed to it either in the laboratory or in the field and were infected. R. culicivorax has been extensively studied for the past 10 years. It can be easily mass produced, is safe to mammals and other non-target organisms, and its environmental limitations are well documented. This parasite is effective when used in water habita~s with the following characteritstics: fresh and non polluted, semi-permanent or permanent, temperature rarely exceeding 40°C, and little water movement. Several natural predators among the aquatic organisms likely to dwell in mosquito pools have been shown to prey on R. culicivorax; but the size, amounts of open water, pH, vegetation densities and host densitie; are not significant factors in the successful use of this biological control agent. This nematode should now be operationally evaluated against vectors during large scale field trials in endemic areas. 1. Identification and Synonymy Nematoda: Mermithidae Romanomermis culicivorax (Ross and Smith, 1976), is a segregate of a complex known previously as Reesimermis nielseni (Tsai and Grundmann, 1969).
    [Show full text]
  • CENSOR® Mosquito Larvicide Granule
    CENSOR® Mosquito Larvicide Granule Controls larvae of mosquitoes which may transmit Zika, Dengue, or Chikun- • Rotate with other labeled effective mosquito larvicides that have a differ- gunya. ent mode of action. To be used in governmental mosquito control programs, by professional pest • In dormant rice fields, standing water within agricultural/crop sites, and control operators, or in other mosquito or midge control operations. permanent marine and freshwater sites, do not make more than 20 ap- plications per year. Active Ingredient: • Use insecticides with a different mode of action (different insecticide Spinosad (a mixture of Spinosyn A and Spinosyn D) 0.5% group) on adult mosquitoes so that both larvae and adults are not Other Ingredients 99.5% exposed to products with the same mode of action. Total 100.0% • Contact your local extension specialist, technical advisor, and/or Clarke representative for insecticide resistance management and/or IPM rec- Group 5 INSECTICIDE ommendations for the specific site and resistant pest problems. • For further information or to report suspected resistance, you may con- KEEP OUT OF REACH OF CHILDREN tact your local Clarke representative by calling 800-323-5727. Precautionary Statements Spray Drift Management Environmental Hazards Avoiding spray drift at the application site is the responsibility of the ap- This product is toxic to aquatic invertebrates. Non-target aquatic in- plicator. The interaction of many equipment and weather related factors vertebrates may be killed in water where this pesticide is used. Do not determines the potential for spray drift. The applicator is responsible for con- contaminate water when cleaning equipment or disposing of equipment sidering all these factors when making decisions.
    [Show full text]