DOCSLIB.ORG

Bulgaria 2002

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Human Development Index: Municipalities in the Context of Districts Human Development Index 2002 Team of Authors National Co-ordinator: Dotcho Mihailov, Ph.D. Co-authors/Assistants: Diana Kopeva, Ph.D., Lyubomir Dimitrov National Statistical Instiute: Sergei Tsvetarski (Team Leader), Alexander Tsvetkov, Todor Todorov Acknowledgements The team of authors expresses its special gratitude to Ms. Marta Ruedas, UNDP Resident Representative and Ms. Minna Tyrkko, UNDP Deputy Resident Representative for their advice, contribution and recommendations. The team also expresses its appreciation for the substantive comments and editorial suggestions to the following UNDP staff members: Ms. Dafina Gercheva, Head of Programme, Ms. Emiliana Zhivkova, Programme Analyst, Ms. Maya Nyagolova, Public Affairs Officer and Ms. Manoela Grozdanova, Programme Analyst/UNAIDS. The team also wishes to acknowledge the editorial advice provided to the English version of this publication by Mr. Steve Martin, Communications Associate. ISBN 954-9724-53-0 © United Nations Development Programme, Sofia 2002 Cover Design and Print: NIBA Consult Contents oreword .................................................................................................................. 5 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................... 7 The concept of human development and the human development index (HDI) .........................................................................................7 The municipal human development index (MHDI) in the context of the district human development index (DHDI)..................................8 2. Economic Component ....................................................................................... 10 General description ............................................................................................................................................ 10 Investments ............................................................................................................................................................... 11 Unemployment ...................................................................................................................................................... 11 Concentration of minorities........................................................................................................................ 12 Migration ..................................................................................................................................................................... 13 The role of municipalities in the economic development of the district .............. 14 Differentiation ........................................................................................................................................................ 15 3. Life Expectancy .................................................................................................... 17 General description ............................................................................................................................................ 17 Environmental factors and the LEI ........................................................................................................ 17 Infrastructural factors of the LEI .............................................................................................................. 18 Ethnic factors ........................................................................................................................................................... 19 Contribution of municipal levels to the district average life expectancy .............. 20 Differentiation ........................................................................................................................................................ 21 4. Education ............................................................................................................... 22 General description ............................................................................................................................................ 22 Ethnic factor ............................................................................................................................................................. 24 Proximity to the school ................................................................................................................................... 24 Level of economic development ............................................................................................................. 25 Differentiation ........................................................................................................................................................ 25 5. Summary: Overall Human Development Index (HDI) ........................... 26 Description of the overall index .............................................................................................................. 26 Differentiation ........................................................................................................................................................ 27 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................................................. 28 Methodology for Calculating the Human Development Index ........... 31 Human development index ......................................................................................................................... 31 Local human development indexes ...................................................................................................... 32 Annex 1: District human development index ............................................ 36 Annex 2: Municipal human development index ....................................... 39 oreword Since 1999, the municipal and district human development indices (MHDI and DHDI) have been contributing to the Bulgarian debate on sustainable local govern- ance. These indices are a local projection of the United Nations Development Pro- gramme (UNDP) global human development index, which is a composite index combining health, education and economic indicators. So far, in Bulgaria the human development indices have been published in the Na- tional Human Development Reports (NHDRs). This year, the indices are presented in a separate publication. Compared to the NHDRs, this publication offers less analysis and recommendations and more statistical trends of the evolution of the MHDIs and DHDIs in 2002. Nevertheless, we hope that these trends will further contribute to the local governance debate. The present publication offers interpretation of the more important factors affecting the development of the MHDIs and DHDIs, while at the same time looking at the role of district governance for the sustainable devel- opment of municipalities. The main message of the publication is that human de- velopment in Bulgaria is marked by differences between the relatively advanced dis- tricts concerning development and those lagging in development. There are impor- tant differences in the level of development of neighbouring municipalities within the same administrative district. Overcoming local differences requires effort of dif- ferent levels of Bulgarian governance at a national level through nationwide poli- cies for the coordination and integration of sectoral economic development and regional planning, at a local level through a more targeted approach to address spe- cific local issues through health care, educational or economic policies tailored to the respective region. This in itself requires the existence of democratic mechanisms for self-governance and accountability at all levels of governance. I would like to express my gratitude to the authors and to the National Statistical Institute. I hope this publication will contribute to the ongoing debate on local gov- ernance based on participation of people in the decision-making process. Marta Ruedas Resident Representative, UNDP Bulgaria 1. Introduction The concept of human development and the human development index (HDI) The concept of sustainable human development is at the heart of the human devel- opment index (HDI). According to this concept, a person needs an equal measure of good income, good health and good education for the achievement of a decent standard of living. However, the equality of these needs presupposes that income in itself is not sufficient for the achievement of sustainable human development, since the level of income is bound to the level of education and makes sense if a person leads a long and healthy life. At the same time the concept of human development is much broader than the measure1 of these three indicators. The concept of sus- tainable human development is the expansion of capabilities that widen peoples choices to lead the lives they value2 . In this sense, achieving high values of the hu- man development index presupposes participation of people in governance, politi- cal freedoms, security and a favourable environment. At the global level, the HDI is calculated annually, and over the past three years Bul- garia was ranked as follows: 62nd in 20023 (out of 173 countries), 57th in 20014 (out of 162 countries) and 60th place in 20005 (out of 174 countries). On a local level, the calculation of the HDI in Bulgaria started in 1999. Since then, the National Human Development Reports (NHDRs)
Recommended publications
  • The Central Regions and the Sofia Agglomeration Area

    The Central Regions and the Sofia Agglomeration Area

    Maria Shishmanova THE CENTRAL REGIONS AND THE SOFIA AGGLOMERATION AREA Abstract. The research presents central regions in Bulgaria using taxonometric method with relevant conclusions. Each municipality in central regions is particularly examined by the elaborated methodic materials. The developed agglomeration areas are situated in the central regions. Sofia agglomeration area is presented using General Spatial Plan of Sofia municipality and Municipal Development Plan (MDP) of Sofia metropolitan municipality. It is set out the vision of development and its priorities, objectives and measures. Key words: central regions, agglomeration areas, Sofia agglomeration area, General Spatial Plan, Municipal Development Plan. Introduction The Central regions comprise 45 percent of the Bulgarian territory. The agglomeration areas are formed in them. The present study examines the development of the Sofia agglomeration area – a metropolis in the central regions of Bulgaria. The agglomeration areas are formed within the range of the central regions in Bulgaria – 6 agglomeration areas with a center – a large city, 30 agglomeration areas with a center – a medium-sized town. Six of the agglomeration areas are formations with more than three municipalities, five of them are with three municipalities each, ten are with 2 municipalities and the rest 15 are autonomous municipalities with an established core. These areas represent the backbone of the economy and social and human potential of the country. They have the highest degree of competitiveness and attractiveness for investment and innovation. Eighty eight municipalities with a total population of 5885455 people1 are included within the scope of the agglomeration areas, which constitutes 77.4 percent of the population of the country.
  • Company Profile

    Company Profile

    www.ecobulpack.com COMPANY PROFILE KEEP BULGARIA CLEAN FOR THE CHILDREN! PHILIPPE ROMBAUT Chairman of the Board of Directors of ECOBULPACK Executive Director of AGROPOLYCHIM JSC-Devnia e, ECOBULPACK are dedicated to keeping clean the environment of the country we live Wand raise our children in. This is why we rely on good partnerships with the State and Municipal Authorities, as well as the responsible business managers who have supported our efforts from the very beginning of our activity. Because all together we believe in the cause: “Keep Bulgaria clean for the children!” VIDIO VIDEV Executive Director of ECOBULPACK Executive Director of NIVA JSC-Kostinbrod,VIDONA JSC-Yambol t ECOBULPACK we guarantee the balance of interests between the companies releasing A packed goods on the market, on one hand, and the companies collecting and recycling waste, on the other. Thus we manage waste throughout its course - from generation to recycling. The funds ECOBULPACK accumulates are invested in the establishment of sustainable municipal separate waste collection systems following established European models with proven efficiency. DIMITAR ZOROV Executive Director of ECOBULPACK Owner of “PARSHEVITSA” Dairy Products ince the establishment of the company we have relied on the principles of democracy as Swell as on an open and fair strategy. We welcome new shareholders. We offer the business an alternative in fulfilling its obligations to utilize packaged waste, while meeting national legislative requirements. We achieve shared responsibilities and reduce companies’ product- packaging fees. MILEN DIMITROV Procurator of ECOBULPACK s a result of our joint efforts and the professionalism of our work, we managed to turn AECOBULPACK JSC into the largest organization utilizing packaging waste, which so far have gained the confidence of more than 3 500 companies operating in the country.
  • Physics in the Middle of the Balkans

    Physics in the Middle of the Balkans

    feaTureS Physics in the middle of the Balkans I Alexander G. Petrov, Nicholay S. Tonchev and Oleg I. Yordanov - DOI: 10.1051/epn/ 2011602 Half a century ago, the Bulgarian Physics community created the Union of the Physicists in Bulgaria (UPB), as in many other countries in that post war period. In this article we outline the history of Physics in Bulgaria, its current state and discuss its future place and perspectives within the Balkan region and in Europe. f founded formally in 1971, UPB has a much lon - ger and illustrious history. Twenty years aer the liberation from the Ottoman rule, the physicists and I mathematicians founded the Bulgarian Physical and Mathematical Society (BPMS, Sofia, March 29, 1898). Note that the secular education with limited mathematics came into the Bulgarian schools as late as in the 1830s-40s, the first Bulgarian high school starting in the early 1860s. e first higher education institution arrived as a pedagogical school in 1888 to become in 1904 the Sofia University (SU). Facing more and more students and professionals beyond 1950, BPMS split (1971) into Bulgarian Physical Society and Bulgarian Mathematical Society. On November 25, 1989, two months aer the fall of the Ber - lin wall, the Bulgarian Physical Society reorganized and became the Union of the Physicists in Bulgaria. Independent of political vagaries, the presidents of UPB or previous organizations have always been outstanding physicists. In the difficult 1945-1950 period the president was Georgi Nadjakov, Fellow of the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences (FBAS), who had worked with both Marie Curie and Paul Langevin in the 20-ies.
  • Regional Case Study of Pazardzhik Province, Bulgaria

    Regional Case Study of Pazardzhik Province, Bulgaria

    Regional Case Study of Pazardzhik Province, Bulgaria ESPON Seminar "Territorial Cohesion Post 2020: Integrated Territorial Development for Better Policies“ Sofia, Bulgaria, 30th of May 2018 General description of the Region - Located in the South-central part of Bulgaria - Total area of the region: 4,458 km2. - About 56% of the total area is covered by forests; 36% - agricultural lands - Population: 263,630 people - In terms of population: Pazardzhik municipality is the largest one with 110,320 citizens General description of the Region - 12 municipalities – until 2015 they were 11, but as of the 1st of Jan 2015 – a new municipality was established Total Male Female Pazardzhik Province 263630 129319 134311 Batak 5616 2791 2825 Belovo 8187 3997 4190 Bratsigovo 9037 4462 4575 Velingrad 34511 16630 17881 Lesichovo 5456 2698 2758 Pazardzhik 110302 54027 56275 Panagyurishte 23455 11566 11889 Peshtera 18338 8954 9384 Rakitovo 14706 7283 7423 Septemvri 24511 12231 12280 Strelcha 4691 2260 2431 Sarnitsa 4820 2420 2400 General description of the Region Population: negative trends 320000 310000 300000 290000 280000 Pazardzhik Province 270000 Population 260000 250000 240000 230000 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 There is a steady trend of reducing the population of the region in past 15 years. It has dropped down by 16% in last 15 years, with an average for the country – 12.2%. The main reason for that negative trend is the migration of young and medium aged people to West Europe, the U.S. and Sofia (capital and the largest city in Bulgaria).
  • Literacy and Census: E Case of Banat Bulgarians, 1890–1910

    Literacy and Census: E Case of Banat Bulgarians, 1890–1910

    144 P P Literacy and Census: e Case of Banat Bulgarians, 1890–1910 Literacy is a dynamic category that changes over time. e understanding of writing has gradually been expanding while its public signi cance has been increasing. e transition to widespread literacy was performed from the 17 th to the 19 th centuries and was connected with the rise of the bourgeoisie, with the development of services and technology that generated economic demand for literate workers. is transition was a slow and gradual process and deve- loped at di erent rates in di erent geographical regions, but from a global point of view it was marked by unprecedented social transformation: while in the mid-19 th century only 10% of the adult population of the world could read and write, in the 21 st century – despite the ve-fold increase in population – 80% have basic literacy. 1 In recent decades this transformation has caused a considerable research interest in the history of literacy and the process of over- coming illiteracy. On the Subject of Research Herein, with respect to the spread of literacy in Austria–Hungary are studied the Banat Bulgarians, who are Western Rite Catholics. In 1890 they numbered 14 801 people. At that time the Banat Bulgarians had already been seled in the Habsburg Empire for a century and a half. ey were refugees from the district of Chiprovtsi town (Northwestern Bulgaria) who had le Bulgarian lands aer the unsuccessful anti-Ooman uprising of 1688. Passing through Wallachia and Southwest Transylvania (the laer under Austrian rule) in the 1 Education for All Global Monitoring Report 2006.
  • BULGARIA 2020 RODOPI MOUNTAINS CYCLE TOUR Semi-Guided - 8 Days/7 Nights

    BULGARIA 2020 RODOPI MOUNTAINS CYCLE TOUR Semi-Guided - 8 Days/7 Nights

    BULGARIA 2020 RODOPI MOUNTAINS CYCLE TOUR Semi-Guided - 8 Days/7 Nights The Rodopi Mountains are located in the oldest part of the Balkans with some of the loveliest coniferous forests in the country. The landscape is gentle and rolling, with gorges intermingling with river basins and valleys. Here one can also find 70% of the world minerals, as well as some 600 caves. Flora and fauna contain species that have become extinct in other European countries. Locals live a traditional way of life: wooden carts pulled by horses, donkeys or cows; nomadic gypsies picking mushrooms and berries in the woods; local Muslim inhabitants growing tobacco and potatoes; and herds of sheep and goats descending the mountain at day’s end. You will cycle through villages with typical Rodopean architecture where speech, songs and customs of the local people create the special identity of the region. You have the chance to visit Bachkovo Monastery, the second largest in Bulgaria; see the Miraculous bridges, two unique natural rock bridges about 40 m. high; Velingrad – the largest Bulgarian spa resort famous for its healing hot mineral water. ITINERARY Day 1. Arrive at Sofia or Plovdiv Airport and transfer to your hotel in Sofia. Day 2. Sofia– Belmeken Dam – Velingrad spa town Transfer to the cycling start a few kilometers before the village of Sestrimo. Cycle up to the Belmeken dam (2000 m) through old coniferous woods. In the afternoon the road passes the Iundola's mountain meadows before descending to the spa town of Velingrad, where you stay overnight in a hotel with mineral water swimming pool.
  • Do Public Fund Windfalls Increase Corruption? Evidence from a Natural Disaster Elena Nikolovaa Nikolay Marinovb 68131 Mannheim A5-6, Germany October 5, 2016

    Do Public Fund Windfalls Increase Corruption? Evidence from a Natural Disaster Elena Nikolovaa Nikolay Marinovb 68131 Mannheim A5-6, Germany October 5, 2016

    Do Public Fund Windfalls Increase Corruption? Evidence from a Natural Disaster Elena Nikolovaa Nikolay Marinovb 68131 Mannheim A5-6, Germany October 5, 2016 Abstract We show that unexpected financial windfalls increase corruption in local govern- ment. Our analysis uses a new data set on flood-related transfers, and the associated spending infringements, which the Bulgarian central government distributed to mu- nicipalities following torrential rains in 2004 and 2005. Using information from the publicly available audit reports we are able to build a unique objective index of cor- ruption. We exploit the quasi-random nature of the rainfall shock (conditional on controls for ground flood risk) to isolate exogenous variation in the amount of funds received by each municipality. Our results imply that a 10 % increase in the per capita amount of disbursed funds leads to a 9.8% increase in corruption. We also present suggestive evidence that more corrupt mayors anticipated punishment by voters and dropped out of the next election race. Our results highlight the governance pitfalls of non-tax transfers, such as disaster relief or assistance from international organizations, even in moderately strong democracies. Keywords: corruption, natural disasters, governance JEL codes: D73, H71, P26 aResearch Fellow, Central European Labour Studies Institute, Slovakia and associated researcher, IOS Regensburg, Germany. Email: [email protected]. We would like to thank Erik Bergl¨of,Rikhil Bhav- nani, Simeon Djankov, Sergei Guriev, Stephan Litschig, Ivan Penkov, Grigore Pop-Eleches, Sandra Sequeira and conference participants at the 2015 Annual Meeting of the European Public Choice Society, Groningen, the 2015 American Political Science Association, San Francisco and seminar participants at Brunel, King's College workshop on corruption, and LSE for useful comments, and Erik Bergl¨ofand Stefka Slavova for help with obtaining Bulgarian rainfall data.
  • 7563/11 HGN/Tt 1 DG H 2B COUNCIL of the EUROPEAN

    7563/11 HGN/Tt 1 DG H 2B COUNCIL of the EUROPEAN

    COUNCIL OF Brussels, 10 March 2011 THE EUROPEAN UNION 7563/11 COPEN 44 EJN 20 EUROJUST 29 NOTE from: Bulgarian Permanent Representation to Delegations Subject: Council Framework Decision 2006/783/JHA of 6 October 2006 on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to confiscation orders – the Republic of Bulgaria Delegations will find enclosed the notification made by Bulgaria in relation to the abovementioned framework decision. _______________ 7563/11 HGN/tt 1 DG H 2B EN DECLARATIONS AND NOTIFICATIONS BY THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 3, ARTICLE 7(5) AND ARTICLE 19 OF COUNCIL FRAMEWORK DECISION 2006/783/JHA OF 6 OCTOBER 2006 ON THE APPLICATION OF THE PRINCIPLE OF MUTUAL RECOGNITION TO CONFISCATION ORDERS The Republic of Bulgaria hereby notifies the General Secretariat of the Council of the following declarations and notifications pursuant to Council Framework Decision 2006/783/JHA of 6 October 2006 on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to confiscation orders and the Law on the recognition, execution and transmission of decisions on confiscation or seizure and decisions on the enforcement of financial penalties adopted by the National Assembly of the Republic of Bulgaria on 11 February 2010 (published in the State Journal of the Republic of Bulgaria No 15 of 23 February 2010), which transposes the abovementioned Framework Decision into the law of the Republic of Bulgaria. 1) Notification pursuant to Article 3 of Framework Decision 2006/783/JHA (determination of the competent authorities): (а) When the Republic of Bulgaria is the executing State: The competent authorities with regard to the recognition of confiscation or seizure orders shall be the provincial courts and Sofia City Court.
  • THE ESSETERRE CO-IMPACT STORY Melissa Planting

    THE ESSETERRE CO-IMPACT STORY Melissa Planting

    Rebuilding Bulgaria THE ESSETERRE CO-IMPACT STORY Melissa planting A New and Different Chapter for Bulgaria Bulgaria is a country rich with opportunity, but it has faced challenges in reaching its full potential. Bulgaria is part of the European Union (EU), but has one of the lowest GDP in the EU—with nearly a quarter of its population living at or below the global poverty line—and is experiencing at present the most extreme population decline in the world. Sadly, each year emigration erases dozens of towns from Bulgaria’s map. High death and low birth rates are also significant factors in depopulation, but lack of opportunity is the primary driver for this migration away from the country. As the nation’s men and women search for jobs abroad, severe structural and industrial decay become increasingly common. Experts on distribution of EU funds cite the high concentration of investments and resources in certain regions at the expense of others as a contributing factor to lagging infrastructure and a diminishing population. Before the fall of Communism, Bulgaria was not only produces some of the world’s best Lavender and an active industrial nation, it also had some of the Melissa. Its sunny and dry climate during harvest world’s preeminent essential oil research, development, coupled with dry, well-drained, sandy soils are ideal for and production. Organizations like the Rose Institute in these aromatic plants. For these reasons, dōTERRA Kazanlak were renowned for their sophistication and chose Eastern Bulgaria as the place to create a world- cutting-edge research. In the Post-Communist Era, not class production center for some of its most valued oils.
  • Presentason of Peer Review Approach and Objecsves

    Presentason of Peer Review Approach and Objecsves

    ! ! AGENDA COALESCCE Peer Review Bulgaria, Sofia 23 – 26 October, 2017 draft 23/10/2017 – Monday Morning and till 15.00 – Arrival of partners 16.30 – 19.30 – Wellcome and Kick Off Meeting of Peer Review Team in the office of EPF, Sofia, 1-9 Chepino Str. - Welcome - Schedule of the week - Conciliation of the peers – tasks and responsibilities Refreshments: coffee, soft drinks, snacks 20.00 – Dinner in the center of Sofia, Bankovich Restaurant, walking distance from the Hotel 24/10/2017 – Tuesday Morning 10.00 – 12.00 – Workshop with Peer Review Team and stakeholders in Bulgaria at Information Center of EU Commission in Sofia, 124 Rakovski Str. - Presenta+on of peer review approach and objec+ves - Presenta+on of Na+onal, South West (SWR) and South Central (SCR) Planning Region policy and ac+vi+es in the field of Energy Efficiency and RES - Ques+ons and answers 12.00 – 13.00 – Informal discussions, sandwiches, coffee/tea Afternoon 14.00 – 17.00 – Interviews - Ministry of Energy - Sustainable Energy Development Agency - Ministry of Regional Development, Managing Authority, OP Regions in Growth 2104 - 2020 17.30 – 19.00 – Peer Review Team briefing, Central Park Hotel Meeting Room ! ! - Discussion on findings and impressions, reach conclusions, and first draI of recommenda+ons. Evening 19.30 – free time 25/10/2017 – Wednesday Morning 8.00 – Departure from the Hotel for field visits to good practices presented by EPF within COALESCCE – trip by buss to Miunicipalities of Ihtiman (SWR) and Bratsigovo (SCR) 10.00 – 11.30 - Visit in Ihtiman, Biomass
  • Annex REPORT for 2019 UNDER the “HEALTH CARE” PRIORITY of the NATIONAL ROMA INTEGRATION STRATEGY of the REPUBLIC of BULGAR

    Annex REPORT for 2019 UNDER the “HEALTH CARE” PRIORITY of the NATIONAL ROMA INTEGRATION STRATEGY of the REPUBLIC of BULGAR

    Annex REPORT FOR 2019 UNDER THE “HEALTH CARE” PRIORITY of the NATIONAL ROMA INTEGRATION STRATEGY OF THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA 2012 - 2020 Operational objective: A national monitoring progress report has been prepared for implementation of Measure 1.1.2. “Performing obstetric and gynaecological examinations with mobile offices in settlements with compact Roma population”. During the period 01.07—20.11.2019, a total of 2,261 prophylactic medical examinations were carried out with the four mobile gynaecological offices to uninsured persons of Roma origin and to persons with difficult access to medical facilities, as 951 women were diagnosed with diseases. The implementation of the activity for each Regional Health Inspectorate is in accordance with an order of the Minister of Health to carry out not less than 500 examinations with each mobile gynaecological office. Financial resources of BGN 12,500 were allocated for each mobile unit, totalling BGN 50,000 for the four units. During the reporting period, the mobile gynecological offices were divided into four areas: Varna (the city of Varna, the village of Kamenar, the town of Ignatievo, the village of Staro Oryahovo, the village of Sindel, the village of Dubravino, the town of Provadia, the town of Devnya, the town of Suvorovo, the village of Chernevo, the town of Valchi Dol); Silistra (Tutrakan Municipality– the town of Tutrakan, the village of Tsar Samuel, the village of Nova Cherna, the village of Staro Selo, the village of Belitsa, the village of Preslavtsi, the village of Tarnovtsi,
  • 1 I. ANNEXES 1 Annex 6. Map and List of Rural Municipalities in Bulgaria

    1 I. ANNEXES 1 Annex 6. Map and List of Rural Municipalities in Bulgaria

    I. ANNEXES 1 Annex 6. Map and list of rural municipalities in Bulgaria (according to statistical definition). 1 List of rural municipalities in Bulgaria District District District District District District /Municipality /Municipality /Municipality /Municipality /Municipality /Municipality Blagoevgrad Vidin Lovech Plovdiv Smolyan Targovishte Bansko Belogradchik Apriltsi Brezovo Banite Antonovo Belitsa Boynitsa Letnitsa Kaloyanovo Borino Omurtag Gotse Delchev Bregovo Lukovit Karlovo Devin Opaka Garmen Gramada Teteven Krichim Dospat Popovo Kresna Dimovo Troyan Kuklen Zlatograd Haskovo Petrich Kula Ugarchin Laki Madan Ivaylovgrad Razlog Makresh Yablanitsa Maritsa Nedelino Lyubimets Sandanski Novo Selo Montana Perushtitsa Rudozem Madzharovo Satovcha Ruzhintsi Berkovitsa Parvomay Chepelare Mineralni bani Simitli Chuprene Boychinovtsi Rakovski Sofia - district Svilengrad Strumyani Vratsa Brusartsi Rodopi Anton Simeonovgrad Hadzhidimovo Borovan Varshets Sadovo Bozhurishte Stambolovo Yakoruda Byala Slatina Valchedram Sopot Botevgrad Topolovgrad Burgas Knezha Georgi Damyanovo Stamboliyski Godech Harmanli Aitos Kozloduy Lom Saedinenie Gorna Malina Shumen Kameno Krivodol Medkovets Hisarya Dolna banya Veliki Preslav Karnobat Mezdra Chiprovtsi Razgrad Dragoman Venets Malko Tarnovo Mizia Yakimovo Zavet Elin Pelin Varbitsa Nesebar Oryahovo Pazardzhik Isperih Etropole Kaolinovo Pomorie Roman Batak Kubrat Zlatitsa Kaspichan Primorsko Hayredin Belovo Loznitsa Ihtiman Nikola Kozlevo Ruen Gabrovo Bratsigovo Samuil Koprivshtitsa Novi Pazar Sozopol Dryanovo