Encyclopedia of Marine Mammals, Second Edition

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Encyclopedia of Marine Mammals, Second Edition 878 Pinnipedia, Overview northern elephant seals. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. Pinnipeds comprise slightly more than one-fourth (26%) of the 293 , R2376 – R2381 . species diversity of marine mammals (approximately 128 species Iverson , S. J. , Hamosh , M. , and Bowen , W. D. ( 1995 ). Lipoprotein lipase currently recognized). Thirty-three living species of pinnipeds are activity and its relationship to high milk fat transfer during lactation distributed throughout the world: 18 phocids, 14 otariids, and the in grey seals . J. Comp. Physiol. B 165 , 384 – 395 . walrus. One additional species of phocid (Caribbean monk seal) and Keith , E. O. , and Ortiz , C. L. ( 1989 ). Glucose kinetics in neonatal ele- one subspecies of otariid (Japanese sea lion) are reported extinct in phant seals during postweaning aphagia . Mar. Mamm. Sci. 5 , 99 – 115 . Lang , S. L. C. , Iverson , S. J. , and Bowen , W. D. ( 2005 ). Individual varia- historical time. tion in milk composition over lactation in harbour seals (Phoca vitu- lina ) and the potential consequences of intermittent attendance. Can. I. Systematics and Distribution J. Zool. 83 , 1525 – 1531 . Mellish , J. E. , Iverson , S. J. , Bowen , W. D. , and Hammill , M. O. ( 1999 ). A. Otariidae: Fur Seals and Sea Lions Fat transfer and energetics during lactation in the hooded seal: the Of the two groups of seals, the otariids are characterized by the pres- roles of tissue lipoprotein lipase in milk fat secretion and pup blubber ence of external ear fl aps or pinnae, and for this reason they are often deposition . J. Comp. Physiol. B 169 , 377 – 390 . called “ eared ” seals ( Fig. 1 ). Otariids (and the walrus) can turn their Nordoy , E. S. , Stijfhoorn , D. E. , Raheim , A. , and Blix , A. S. ( 1992 ). hindfl ippers forward and use them to walk (discussed further under Water fl ux and early signs of entrance into phase-iii of fasting in gray Adaptations). The Otariidae traditionally are divided into two sub- seal pups . Acta Physiol. Scand. 144 , 477 – 482 . Nord ø y , E. S. , and Blix , A. S. ( 1991 ). Glucose and ketone body turnover families Otariinae (sea lions) and Arctocephalinae (fur seals) although in fasting grey seal pups . Acta Physiol. Scand. 141 , 563 – 571 . recent molecular studies have revealed that neither fur seals nor sea Ortiz , R. M. , Wade , C. E. , and Ortiz , C. L. ( 2001 ). Effects of prolonged lions are monophyletic. Five living genera and species of sea lions are fasting on plasma cortisol and TH in postweaned northern ele- recognized, occurring in both the northern and southern hemispheres: phant seal pups . Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 280 , Eumetopias jubata (northern or Steller’s sea lion), Neophoca cinerea R790 – R795 . (Australian sea lion), Otaria byronia (Southern sea lion), Zalophus cali- Ortiz , R. M. , Wade , C. E. , and Ortiz , C. L. ( 2003 ). Body water handling fornianus ( Z. c. californianus California sea lion, Z. c. japonicus Japanese in response to hypertonic-saline induced diuresis in fasting north- sea lion, and Z. c. wollebacki Galapagos sea lion), and Phocarctos ern elephant seal pups (Mirounga angustirostris ) . Comp. Biochem. hookeri (New Zealand sea lion; Fig. 2 ). The fur seals, named for their Physiol. A 134 , 423 – 428 . thick, dense fur, include two genera, the monotypic Northern fur seal Ortiz , R. M. , Crocker , D. E. , Houser , D. S. , and Webb , P. M. ( 2006). Angiotensin II and aldosterone increase with fasting in breeding adult (Callorhinus ursinus ) and the southern fur seals (Arctocephalus ), con- male northern elephant seals ( Mirounga angustirostris ) . Physiol. sisting of eight species: A. australis (South American fur seal), A. forsteri Biochem. Zool. 79 ( 6 ) , 1106 – 1112 . (New Zealand fur seal), A. gazella (Antarctic fur seal), A. galapagoensis Pernia , S. D. , Costa , D. P. , and Ortiz , C. L. ( 1989 ). Glomerular fi ltration (Galapagos fur seal), A. philippii (Juan Fernandez fur seal), A. pusillus rate in weaned elephant seal pups during natural, long term fasts. (A. p. pusillus South African fur seal and A. p. doriferus Australian fur Can. J. Zool. (J. Can. Zool.) 67 , 1752 – 1756 . seal), A. townsendi (Guadalupe fur seal), and A. tropicalis (Subantarctic Sharp , J. A. , Cane , K. N. , Lefevre , C. , Arnould , J. P. Y. , and Nicholas , K. fur seal). All of the fur seals except the northern and Guadalupe fur seals R. ( 2006 ). Fur seal adaptations to lactation: Insights into mammary are found in the southern hemisphere. The northern fur seal is found gland function . Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 72 , 276–308 . in subarctic waters of the North Pacifi c, with the exception of a small Sharp , J. A. , Lefevre , C. , Brennan , A. J. , and Nicholas , K. R. ( 2007). population on San Miguel Island off California ( Fig. 3 ). The fur seal — a model lactation phenotype to explore molecular fac- tors involved in the initiation of apoptosis at involution . J. Mammary Otariid monophyly is well supported based on a both morphologic Gland Biol. Neoplasia 12 , 4 7 – 5 8 . as well as molecular data. Morphologic and molecular studies con- Tedman , R. A. ( 1983 ). Ultrastructural morphology of the mammary- sistently position Callorhinus as the earliest diverging extant otariid gland with observations on the size distribution of fat droplets in milk ( Fig. 4 ). Extinct otariids Pithanotaria , Thalassoleon , and Hydractos of the Weddell seal Leptonychotes weddelli (Pinnipedia) . J. Zool. are sequential sister taxa to Callorhinus . Molecular results strongly 200 , 131 – 141 . support a branch containing the Guadalupe, South American, and Tedman , R. A. , and Bryden , M. M. ( 1981 ). The mammary-gland of the New Zealand fur seals and the Australian and New Zealand sea lion. Weddell seal, Leptonychotes weddelli (Pinnipedia) 1. Gross and Good support was also found for South African fur seals as sister microscopic anatomy . Anat. Rec. 199 , 519 – 529 . to this clade. The relationship between Northern ϩ California sea P Worthy , G. A. J. ( 1991 ). Insulation and thermal balance of fasting harp lions, Southern sea lion and remaining sea lions and Arctocephalus and gray seal pups . Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A 100 , 845 – 851 . species is not conclusively resolved. In support of fur seal and sea lion paraphyly is evidence for hybridization of various sympatric spe- cies (e.g., Arctocephalus gazella / A. tropicalis / A. forsteri , Zalophus californianus / Otaria byronia). Additionally, the violent sexual behav- ior by male sea lions toward females of different species my have resulted in more hybridization and introgression than has been typi- Pinnipedia, Overview cally recognized for the evolutionary history of otariids. ANNALISA BERTA B. Odobenidae: Walruses innipeds have always been understood to represent a group Although tusks are arguably the most characteristic feature of the distinct from other aquatic mammals. They are recog- modern walrus a rapidly improving fossil record indicates that these Pnized as members of the mammalian order Carnivora and unique structures evolved in a single lineage of walruses and “ tusks do include three monophyletic lineages, Otariidae (fur seals and sea not a walrus make ” ( Repenning and Tedford, 1977). The living walrus lions), Odobenidae (walruses), and Phocidae (true or earless seals). is the sole survivor of what was once a diverse radiation of at least 11 (A) (B) Figure 1 Representative otariids (A) southern sea lion, Otaria byronia and (B) South African fur seal, Arctocephalus pusillus, illustrating pinna. Note also the thick, dense fur characteristic of fur seals. Illustrations by P. Folkens. (From Berta et al., 2006 .) Figure 2 Distribution of sea lions. Based on Riedman (1990) . (From Berta et al., 2006 .) P Figure 3 Distribution of fur seals. Based on Riedman (1990) . (From Berta et al., 2006 .) 880 Pinnipedia, Overview genera and 14 species of walruses that lived from the early Miocene to molecular studies provide consistent, robust support for an alternative the end of the Pliocene (see also pinniped evolution ). Two subspe- alliance between otariids and odobenids. A survey of genetic variation cies of the modern walrus Odobenus rosmarus are usually recognized: among Atlantic and Pacifi c populations of the walrus suggests separa- O. r. rosmarus (Atlantic walrus) and O. rosmarus divergens (Pacifi c tion of the subspecies about 500,000– 750,000 years ago, supporting walrus) although a population from the Laptev Sea has been described the suggestion that Odobenus evolved in the Pacifi c and reached the as a third subspecies O. rosmarus. lapteevi but this has not been sub- North Atlantic early in Pleistocene time (Cronin et al ., 1994 ). stantiated. Pacifi c walruses are more abundant, are larger, and have longer tusks than Atlantic walruses ( Fay, 1981 ). Walruses inhabit the C. Phocidae: Seals northern hemisphere in areas with pack ice over shallow water of the The second major grouping of seals, the phocids, often are referred continental shelf ( Fig. 5 ). Like phocids, walruses lack external ear to as the “ true ” or “ earless ” seals for their lack of visible ear pinnae, fl aps. A unique feature of members of the modern walrus lineage are a characteristic which readily distinguishes them from otariids as enlarged upper canine tusks that function primarily in breeding and well as the walrus ( Fig. 6 ). Among the most distinguishing phocid social contexts. Walrus locomotion combines elements of phocid and otariid locomotion (discussed further under Adaptations). Monophyly
Recommended publications
  • Biology; of the Seal
    7 PREFACE The first International Symposium on the Biology papers were read by title and are included either in of the Seal was held at the University of Guelph, On­ full or abstract form in this volume. The 139 particip­ tario, Canada from 13 to 17 August 1972. The sym­ ants represented 16 countries, permitting scientific posium developed from discussions originating in Dub­ interchange of a truly international nature. lin in 1969 at the meeting of the Marine Mammals In his opening address, V. B. Scheffer suggested that Committee of the International Council for the Ex­ a dream was becoming a reality with a meeting of ploration of the Sea (ICES). The culmination of such a large group of pinniped biologists. This he felt three years’ organization resulted in the first interna­ was very relevant at a time when the relationship of tional meeting, and this volume. The president of ICES marine mammals and man was being closely examined Professor W. Cieglewicz, offered admirable support as on biological, political and ethical grounds. well as honouring the participants by attending the The scientific session commenced with a seven paper symposium. section on evolution chaired by E. D. Mitchell which The programme committee was composed of experts showed the origins and subsequent development of representing the major international sponsors. W. N. this amphibious group of higher vertebrates. Many of Bonner, Head, Seals Research Division, Institute for the arguments for particular evolutionary trends are Marine Environmental Research (IMER), represented speculative in nature and different interpretations can ICES; A. W. Mansfield, Director, Arctic Biological be attached to the same fossil material.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploitation of Fur Seals and Sea Lions from Australian, New Zealand and Adjacent Subantarctic Islands During the Eighteenth, Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries
    Exploitation of fur seals and sea lions from Australian, New Zealand and adjacent subantarctic islands during the eighteenth, nineteenth and twentieth centuries John K. Ling P.O. Box 271, Clare, South Australia 5459 ABSTRACT Details of skin cargoes of fur seal Arctocephalus spp. and sea lion Neophoca cinerea and Phocarctos hookeri, originating from southern Australia, New Zealand and the adjacent subantarctic islands in the lath, 19th and 20th centuries have been collated from several secondary historicsl sources. These sources quoted quantities of skins in terms of actual tallied numbers, as untallied "cargoes" or as casks, sacks or bundles. Untallied cargoes were Downloaded from http://meridian.allenpress.com/australian-zoologist/article-pdf/31/2/323/1473420/az_1999_036.pdf by guest on 30 September 2021 converted into numbers by averaging tallied cargoes; and casks, sacks and bundles were arbitrarily deemed to contain 40, 20 and 5 skins respectively. Annual and total yields of skins are presented for ten separate areas in the region: Bass Strait, King Island, Kangaroo Island. Western Australia, New Zealand, Bounty Islands, Auckland Islands, Antipodes Islands. Campbell Island and Macquarie island. At least 1 367 000 fur seal skins were harvested between 1792 and 1948149 in the whole of the Australasian region. More than 1309 000 skins - 96% of the total - were taken up to 1830. Records indicate that only about 4 100 Neophoca and 5 800 Phocarctos were obtained from their respective areas. These figures must be regarded as minimal, as it is likely thatmany cargoes were obtained by English, American and French vessels and shipped directly to European or Asian markets.
    [Show full text]
  • CCS Study EMS 90-0058 Migration of Northern Fur Seal (Callorhinus
    CCS Study EMS 90-0058 Migration of northern fur seal (Callorhinus ursinus) pups in the Bering Sea. Final Report. Timothy J. Ragen and Paul K. Dayton Scripps Institution of Oceanography University of California, San Diego La Jolla, California 92093 September 1990 Minerals Management SeNice Department of the Interior Alaska CCS Region 949 East 366th Avenue Anchorage, Alaska 99508-4302 Purchase Order No. <~ --.-J ● Migration of northern fur seal (Callorhinus ursinus) pups in the Bering Sea. Final Report. Timothy J. Ragen and Paul K. Dayton Scripps Institution of Oceanography University of California, San Diego La Jolla, California 92093 September 1990 This study was funded in part by the Alaska Outer Continental Shelf Region of the Minerals Management Service, U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, D.C., under Purchase Order No. 12523. This report has been reviewed by the Minerals Management Service and has been approved for publication. Approval does not signify that the contents necessarily reflect the view and policies of the Service, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. AUTHORS AND RESPONSIBILITIES This report was written by Timothy J. Ragen, under the supervision of Paul K. Dayton. Dr. Ragen and George A. Antonelisr Jr., National Marine Mammal Laboratory, conducted the field portion of this study. ● Migration of northern fur seal (Callorhinus ursims) pups in the Bering Sea. Final Report. Table of Contents Introduction . 1 Methods . 8 Results . , . , . , . 11 Discussion . 17 Summary . 31 References . 33 MIG~TION OF NORTHERM FUR SEAL ( CALLORHINUS URSINUS) PUPS IN TEE BERING SEA INTRODUCTION The northern fur seal (Callorhinus ursinus) is arguably the most extensively studied marine mammal in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • 56. Otariidae and Phocidae
    FAUNA of AUSTRALIA 56. OTARIIDAE AND PHOCIDAE JUDITH E. KING 1 Australian Sea-lion–Neophoca cinerea [G. Ross] Southern Elephant Seal–Mirounga leonina [G. Ross] Ross Seal, with pup–Ommatophoca rossii [J. Libke] Australian Sea-lion–Neophoca cinerea [G. Ross] Weddell Seal–Leptonychotes weddellii [P. Shaughnessy] New Zealand Fur-seal–Arctocephalus forsteri [G. Ross] Crab-eater Seal–Lobodon carcinophagus [P. Shaughnessy] 56. OTARIIDAE AND PHOCIDAE DEFINITION AND GENERAL DESCRIPTION Pinnipeds are aquatic carnivores. They differ from other mammals in their streamlined shape, reduction of pinnae and adaptation of both fore and hind feet to form flippers. In the skull, the orbits are enlarged, the lacrimal bones are absent or indistinct and there are never more than three upper and two lower incisors. The cheek teeth are nearly homodont and some conditions of the ear that are very distinctive (Repenning 1972). Both superfamilies of pinnipeds, Phocoidea and Otarioidea, are represented in Australian waters by a number of species (Table 56.1). The various superfamilies and families may be distinguished by important and/or easily observed characters (Table 56.2). King (1983b) provided more detailed lists and references. These and other differences between the above two groups are not regarded as being of great significance, especially as an undoubted fur seal (Australian Fur-seal Arctocephalus pusillus) is as big as some of the sea lions and has some characters of the skull, teeth and behaviour which are rather more like sea lions (Repenning, Peterson & Hubbs 1971; Warneke & Shaughnessy 1985). The Phocoidea includes the single Family Phocidae – the ‘true seals’, distinguished from the Otariidae by the absence of a pinna and by the position of the hind flippers (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Brucella Antibody Seroprevalence in Antarctic Seals (Arctocephalus Gazella, Leptonychotes Weddellii and Mirounga Leonina)
    Vol. 105: 175–181, 2013 DISEASES OF AQUATIC ORGANISMS Published September 3 doi: 10.3354/dao02633 Dis Aquat Org Brucella antibody seroprevalence in Antarctic seals (Arctocephalus gazella, Leptonychotes weddellii and Mirounga leonina) Silje-Kristin Jensen1,2,*, Ingebjørg Helena Nymo1, Jaume Forcada3, Ailsa Hall2, Jacques Godfroid1 1Section for Arctic Veterinary Medicine, Norwegian School of Veterinary Science, Stakkevollveien 23, 9010 Tromsø, Norway; member of the Fram Centre - High North Research Centre for Climate and the Environment, 9296 Tromsø, Norway 2Sea Mammal Research Unit, Scottish Oceans Institute, University of St. Andrews, St. Andrews KY16 8LB, UK 3British Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0ET, UK ABSTRACT: Brucellosis is a worldwide infectious zoonotic disease caused by Gram-negative bac- teria of the genus Brucella, and Brucella infections in marine mammals were first reported in 1994. A serosurvey investigating the presence of anti-Brucella antibodies in 3 Antarctic pinniped spe- cies was undertaken with a protein A/G indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (iELISA) and the Rose Bengal test (RBT). Serum samples from 33 Weddell seals Leptonychotes weddelli were analysed, and antibodies were detected in 8 individuals (24.2%) with the iELISA and in 21 (65.6%) with the RBT. We tested 48 southern elephant seal Mirounga leonina sera and detected antibodies in 2 animals (4.7%) with both the iELISA and the RBT. None of the 21 Antarctic fur seals Arctocephalus gazella was found positive. This is the first report of anti-Brucella antibodies in southern elephant seals. The potential impact of Brucella infection in pinnipeds in Antarctica is not known, but Brucella spp.
    [Show full text]
  • Hunting and Social Behaviour of Leopard Seals (Hydrurga Leptonyx) at Seal Island, South Shetland Islands, Antarctica
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Publications, Agencies and Staff of the U.S. Department of Commerce U.S. Department of Commerce 1999 Hunting and social behaviour of leopard seals (Hydrurga leptonyx) at Seal Island, South Shetland Islands, Antarctica Lisa M. Hiruki National Marine Mammal Laboratory, Alaska Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, [email protected] Michael K. Schwartz National Marine Mammal Laboratory, Alaska Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Peter L. Boveng National Marine Mammal Laboratory, Alaska Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usdeptcommercepub Part of the Environmental Sciences Commons Hiruki, Lisa M.; Schwartz, Michael K.; and Boveng, Peter L., "Hunting and social behaviour of leopard seals (Hydrurga leptonyx) at Seal Island, South Shetland Islands, Antarctica" (1999). Publications, Agencies and Staff of the U.S. Department of Commerce. 151. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usdeptcommercepub/151 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the U.S. Department of Commerce at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Publications, Agencies and Staff of the U.S. Department of Commerce by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. J. Zool., Lond. (1999) 249, 97±109 # 1999 The Zoological Society of London Printed in the United Kingdom Hunting and social behaviour of leopard seals (Hydrurga leptonyx) at Seal Island, South Shetland Islands, Antarctica Lisa M. Hiruki*, Michael K. Schwartz{ and Peter L.
    [Show full text]
  • Letter to K. Baker, 1-29-07
    Marine Mammal Commission 4340 East-West Highway, Room 905 Bethesda, MD 20814 29January 2007 Mr. Kyle Baker National Marine Fisheries Service 263 13th Avenue, South St. Petersburg, FL 33701 Dear Mr. Baker: The Marine Mammal Commission, in consultation with its Committee of Scientific Advisors on Marine Mammals, has reviewed the National Marine Fisheries Service’s 29 November 2006 Federal Register notice announcing its intent to conduct a review of the Caribbean monk seal, Monachus tropicalis, under the Endangered Species Act and requesting information on the species’ status. We have reviewed our files and, with great regret, we have concluded that the species is extinct and should be removed from the list of endangered and threatened species. Fossil and archeological evidence, along with sighting records, indicate that the species once occurred from the southeastern United States through the Bahamas and the Caribbean Sea. A review of those records by Rice (1973) concluded that the last authoritative sighting was of a small colony of animals at Seranilla Banks between Jamaica and the Yucatan Peninsula in 1952. A few other unconfirmed sightings were reported from the 1950s into the 1970s, but at least some of those were reported to involve escaped California sea lions (Gunter 1968 cited in Rice 1973). Although the species may have been extinct when the Endangered Species Act was passed in 1973, the Marine Mammal Commission wrote to the National Marine Fisheries Service on 26 January 1977 recommending that the Caribbean monk seal be listed as “endangered” under the Endangered Species Act and “depleted” under the Marine Mammal Protection Act.
    [Show full text]
  • The Antarctic Ross Seal, and Convergences with Other Mammals
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Servicio de Difusión de la Creación Intelectual Evolutionary biology Sensory anatomy of the most aquatic of rsbl.royalsocietypublishing.org carnivorans: the Antarctic Ross seal, and convergences with other mammals Research Cleopatra Mara Loza1, Ashley E. Latimer2,†, Marcelo R. Sa´nchez-Villagra2 and Alfredo A. Carlini1 Cite this article: Loza CM, Latimer AE, 1 Sa´nchez-Villagra MR, Carlini AA. 2017 Sensory Divisio´n Paleontologı´a de Vertebrados, Museo de La Plata, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, La Plata, Argentina. CONICET, La Plata, Argentina anatomy of the most aquatic of carnivorans: 2Pala¨ontologisches Institut und Museum der Universita¨tZu¨rich, Karl-Schmid Strasse 4, 8006 Zu¨rich, Switzerland the Antarctic Ross seal, and convergences with MRS-V, 0000-0001-7587-3648 other mammals. Biol. Lett. 13: 20170489. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2017.0489 Transitions to and from aquatic life involve transformations in sensory sys- tems. The Ross seal, Ommatophoca rossii, offers the chance to investigate the cranio-sensory anatomy in the most aquatic of all seals. The use of non-invasive computed tomography on specimens of this rare animal Received: 1 August 2017 reveals, relative to other species of phocids, a reduction in the diameters Accepted: 12 September 2017 of the semicircular canals and the parafloccular volume. These features are independent of size effects. These transformations parallel those recorded in cetaceans, but these do not extend to other morphological features such as the reduction in eye muscles and the length of the neck, emphasizing the independence of some traits in convergent evolution to aquatic life.
    [Show full text]
  • 1995-2006 Activities Report
    WILDLIFE WITHOUT BORDERS WILDLIFE WITHOUT BORDERS WITHOUT WILDLIFE M E X I C O The most wonderful mystery of life may well be EDITORIAL DIRECTION Office of International Affairs U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service the means by which it created so much diversity www.fws.gov PRODUCTION from so little physical matter. The biosphere, all Agrupación Sierra Madre, S.C. www.sierramadre.com.mx EDITORIAL REVISION organisms combined, makes up only about one Carole Bullard PHOTOGRAPHS All by Patricio Robles Gil part in ten billion [email protected] Excepting: Fabricio Feduchi, p. 13 of the earth’s mass. [email protected] Patricia Rojo, pp. 22-23 [email protected] Fulvio Eccardi, p. 39 It is sparsely distributed through MEXICO [email protected] Jaime Rojo, pp. 44-45 [email protected] a kilometre-thick layer of soil, Antonio Ramírez, Cover (Bat) On p. 1, Tamul waterfall. San Luis Potosí On p. 2, Lacandon rainforest water, and air stretched over On p. 128, Fisherman. Centla wetlands, Tabasco All rights reserved © 2007, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service a half billion square kilometres of surface. The rights of the photographs belongs to each photographer PRINTED IN Impresora Transcontinental de México EDWARD O. WILSON 1992 Photo: NASA U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE DIVISION OF INTERNATIONAL CONSERVATION WILDLIFE WITHOUT BORDERS MEXICO ACTIVITIES REPORT 1995-2006 U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE At their roots, all things hold hands. & When a tree falls down in the forest, SECRETARÍA DE MEDIO AMBIENTE Y RECURSOS NATURALES MEXICO a star falls down from the sky. CHAN K’IN LACANDON ELDER LACANDON RAINFOREST CHIAPAS, MEXICO FOREWORD onservation of biological diversity has truly arrived significant contributions in time, dedication, and C as a global priority.
    [Show full text]
  • Fur Seals Do, but Sea Lions Don't – Cross Taxa Insights Into Exhalation
    Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B. article template Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B. doi:10.1098/not yet assigned Fur seals do, but sea lions don’t – cross taxa insights into exhalation during ascent from dives Sascha K. Hooker1*, Russel D. Andrews2, John P. Y. Arnould3, Marthán N. Bester4, Randall W. Davis5, Stephen J. Insley6,7, Nick J. Gales8, Simon D. Goldsworthy9,10, J. Chris McKnight1. 1Sea Mammal Research Unit, University of St Andrews, Fife, KY16 8LB, UK 2Marine Ecology and Telemetry Research, Seabeck, WA 98380, USA 3School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria 3125Australia 4Mammal Research Inst., University of Pretoria, Hatfield, 0028 Gauteng, South Africa 5Dept. Marine Biology, Texax A&M University, Galveston, TX 77553, USA 6Dept. Biology, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada, V8P 5C2 7Wildlife Conservation Society Canada, Whitehorse, YT, Canada, Y1A 0E9 8Australian Antarctic Division, Tasmania 7050, Australia 9South Australian Research and Development Institute, West Beach, SA 5024, Australia 10School of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia 5005, Australia SKH, 0000-0002-7518-3548; RDA, 0000-0002-4545-137X; JPYA, 0000-0003-1124-9330; MNB, 0000-0002-2265-764X; SJI, 0000-0003-3402-8418; SDG, 0000-0003-4988-9085; JCM, 0000-0002-3872-4886 Keywords: Otariid, Shallow-water blackout, Diving physiology, Gas management Summary Management of gases during diving is not well understood across marine mammal species. Prior to diving, phocid (true) seals generally exhale, a behaviour thought to assist with prevention of decompression sickness. Otariid seals (fur seals and sea lions) have a greater reliance on their lung oxygen stores, and inhale prior to diving.
    [Show full text]
  • What Do You Do When a Northern Elephant Seal Visits Your Beach?
    Summer 2019 Island County, WA Issue No. 124 By Darcy McNamara, Extension Coordinator, Jefferson County Extension and Bob Simmons, Associate Professor, WSU Extension. Special thanks to Joanne for sharing her story and to Betsy Carlson, Port Townsend Marine Science Center. What do you do when a northern elephant seal visits your beach? This female northern elephant seal was recovering from injuries when it showed up at Joanne's house. Photo by Joanne. Joanne had a big surprise waiting when she returned home one afternoon in July. There was something on her beach. At first, she thought it was just a large seal, but as a recent graduate of WSU’s Beach Naturalist class and a trained “seal sitter,” something about it was different. Looking through binoculars she saw it had black whiskers, small fore flippers, and no external ear flaps (making it a true seal). But the size was what gave the visitor’s identity away. It was a northern elephant seal (Mirounga angustirostris) – the largest true seal in the northern hemisphere. Females grow up to 10 feet long and weigh up to 1,300 pounds and males can even grow larger, reaching 13 feet long and 4,000 pounds. The seal resting on the beach in July. Photo by Joanne. Joanne contacted Betsy Carlson, Citizen Science Coordinator for the Port Townsend Marine Science Center and learned that a badly injured female northern elephant seal had been seen on a nearby Olympic Peninsula beach in April. The seal in front of Joanne’s home had some scars and they determined it was probably the same animal.
    [Show full text]
  • Harbor Seal Species Profile Encyclopedia of Puget Sound June 9, 2014
    (Photograph by G. E. Davis) Harbor seal species profile Encyclopedia of Puget Sound June 9, 2014 Jacqlynn C. Zier and Joseph K. Gaydos* SeaDoc Society / UC Davis’ Karen C. Drayer Wildlife Health Center Orcas Island Office 942 Deer Harbor Road, Eastsound, WA 98245 *Corresponding author [email protected] Table of Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................. 3 Distribution .............................................................................................................. 3 Global .............................................................................................................................................................................. 3 Local ................................................................................................................................................................................ 3 1 Populations .............................................................................................................. 4 Genetic diversity ........................................................................................................................................................ 4 Population size ........................................................................................................................................................... 5 Longevity and survival ..........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]