Conservation, Development, and Function of a Cement Gland-Like Structure in the fish Astyanax Mexicanus

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Conservation, development, and function of a cement gland-like structure in the fish Astyanax mexicanus Karen Pottin, Carole Hyacinthe, and Sylvie Rétaux1 NeD UPR2197, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Institut A. Fessard, 91198 Gif/Yvette, France Edited by Sean B. Carroll, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, and approved August 17, 2010 (received for review April 19, 2010) The larvae of the fish Astyanax mexicanus transiently develop to be carried out to support homology between the frog CG and a flat and adhesive structure on the top of their heads that we these organs, which appear widely diversified in number, size, have called “the casquette” (cas, meaning “hat”). We hypothesized shape, structure, and location on larval bodies. that the cas may be a teleostean homolog of the well-studied Astyanax mexicanus, the Mexican tetra, belongs to the order of Xenopus cement gland, despite their different positions and struc- characiforms. Astyanax has become increasingly popular for evo- tures. Here we show that the cas has an ectodermal origin, se- lutionary developmental studies because the species includes Bmp4 cretes mucus, expresses bone morphogenic protein 4 ( ) and many populations of blind and depigmented cavefish (CF), allow- Pitx1/2 pituitary homeobox 1/2 ( ), is innervated by the trigeminal ing the study of mechanisms of morphological and behavioral ganglion and serotonergic raphe neurons, and has a role in the evolution in adaptive context (18, 19). Here, we present evi- control and the development of the larval swimming behavior. fi Astyanax These developmental, connectivity, and behavioral functional data dence that both CF and surface sh (SF) larvae possess support a level of deep homology between the frog cement gland an adhesive organ, and we gather developmental, connectivity, and the Astyanax cas and suggest that attachment organs can and behavioral functional data to compare that organ with the develop in varied positions on the head ectoderm by recruitment frog CG, despite their major differences in morphology and po- of a Bmp4-dependent developmental module. We also show that sition. We also show that the attachment organ of the cichlid the attachment organs of the cichlid Tilapia mariae larvae display Tilapia mariae larvae shares some of these features. some of these features. We discuss the possibility that these highly diversified attachment glands may be ancestral to chordates and Results have been lost repetitively in many vertebrate classes. A Sticky, Mucus-Secreting, and Transient Organ on the Head of Astyanax Larvae. In the course of our studies on Astyanax,we bone morphogenic protein 4 | pituitary homeobox 1/2 | trigeminal | fish observed a peculiar structure located on top of the dorsal brain, behavior | homology overlying the midbrain–hindbrain boundary (Fig. 1 A–C, live larvae), which is not seen in other model fishes such as zebra- any vertebrate aquatic larvae possess an adhesive organ fish or medaka. We have called that structure the “casquette” Mthat secretes sticky mucus. The most popular among these (cas, meaning “hat”). The cas is very sticky and retains any par- organs is the amphibian cement gland (CG), which has been ticle in the swimming medium (Fig. 1B). It is a transient structure, studied widely from functional and developmental points of view, visible as a thickening of the epidermis as early as 20 h post- mainly in Xenopus (1, 2). The mature gland is composed of elon- fertilization (hpf) and well seen from 24 hpf (hatching time for gated secretory cells with basal cells underlying them (3). This Astyanax)to∼50 hpf. The cas is composed of elongated and organ allows the newly hatched larvae to hang motionless from parallel large cells containing a basally located nucleus and nu- the water surface or from plant leaves before they can swim or merous granules (Fig. 1C). These elongated cells are supported feed. Because it is innervated by the trigeminal nerve, the CG by a thin monolayer of small cells with horizontally oriented nu- mediates a stopping response when the larva encounters a surface clei that we interpret as basal supporting cells (Figs. 1H and 2 J or is safely attached (4, 5). It thus is a transient organ that fulfils and K). The cas undergoes massive and specific cell death (Fig. both an attachment and a mechano-sensory function. The Xenopus CG derives from the outer ectoderm at the 1D) but no proliferation (Fig. 1E) and disappears completely anteroventral side of the head and is visible by pigmentation by after 3 d of development. The high granule content and adhesive neurula stage (6). By that time, the CG starts to express proteins nature of the cas suggested that it may secrete substances such as such as anterior gradient (xAgr) that are used as CG markers and mucus. Indeed, it is stained selectively and strongly by the pe- are important for the gland’s secreting function (7, 8). The posi- riod acid-Schiff (PAS) histological method, which labels mucus- tioning and inducing of the CG relies on the expression of or- secreting cells (Fig. 1 F–H). The intensity of PAS staining of the thodenticle homeobox 2 (Otx2) and pituitary homeobox (Pitx) cas increases as development proceeds (Fig. 1 F–H), and the la- genes (2, 8–12), whereas adequate levels of bone morphogenic beling is concentrated at the apical/external surface of the elon- protein 4 (Bmp4) signals are permissive for its development (13). gated cas cells (Fig. 1 G and H). There are no differences between The study of the amphibian CG has been confined mainly to CF and SF larvae in these events, so the data presented are taken the Xenopus laevis species, although a recently published, com- collectively from both forms, except as otherwise indicated. plete survey of the existence and morphology of the CG in 20 anuran species discusses the CG with regard to the species’ hab- itat, behavior, and mode of development (14). The balancers of Author contributions: K.P. and S.R. designed research; K.P., C.H., and S.R. performed re- urodele amphibians have been suggested to be related evolu- search; K.P., C.H., and S.R. analyzed data; and S.R. wrote the paper. tionarily to the anuran CG, and some support for this idea comes The authors declare no conflict of interest. from the description of trigeminal innervation and Otx5 expres- This article is a PNAS Direct Submission. sion in the balancers (5, 15, 16). Among other chordates, a similar Data deposition: The sequences reported in this paper have been deposited in the Gen- transient adhesive organ has been described in ascidians (17) and Bank database (accession nos. HQ225730 to HQ225734). in some fishes belonging to the basal actinopterygians and to the 1To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: [email protected]. cichlids (Discussion). However, relevant comparative morpho- This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10. logical, molecular, developmental, and functional studies have yet 1073/pnas.1005035107/-/DCSupplemental. 17256–17261 | PNAS | October 5, 2010 | vol. 107 | no. 40 www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1005035107 Downloaded by guest on October 2, 2021 Fig. 2. The cas expresses high levels of Bmp4 and Pitx genes. In all panels, a thick black arrow indicates the cas. (A–G) Bmp4 expression (blue) in toto (A, B, D, and E) and on sections (F and G). C′ Inset shows a high magnification of a section double-labeled for Bmp4 (black) and Hnk1 (green). (A and B) Lateral views. (D and E) Dorsal views. (H–K) Pitx1/2 expression in toto (H, dorsal; I, lateral) and in sections (J and K). In H the dashed line delineates the cas contours. In I the asterisks indicate the expressing lamina below the posterior cas. In J and K (high power), DAPI-stained nuclei are blue. White arrows point to the nuclei of secretory cells; white arrowheads point to nuclei of basal cells. Stages are indicated. Cp, choroid plexus; e, eye; ot, otic Fig. 1. The cas is a sticky, transient, and mucus-secreting structure. (A) vesicle; rl, rhombic lip; rp, roof plate; tb, tailbud; tc, tela choroida. General view and (B) close-up of the cas (black arrow in A) of a live CF embryo at 24 hpf. The asterisk indicates a particle adhering to the cas. (C) terior aspect (Fig. 2 D and E). Observation of transverse sections Nomarski image of a live CF at 36 hpf. White arrows show basally located nuclei of elongated cells; arrowheads point to basal cells. Both types of cells shows Bmp4 expression in both the elongated and the basal cas and their nuclei are delineated by dotted lines. Note the high density of cells, as well as in the forming and underlying choroid plexuses granules. (D) LysoTracker live fluorescent imaging of an SF at 40 hpf. Cell (neurohemal organs that secrete the cerebrospinal fluid) of the death is seen in the cas (white arrows). (E) Section from a 36-hpf SF stained brain ventricle (Fig. 2 F and G). for proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA, brown). (F–H) Sections of CF cas We also tested whether the cas expresses Pitx genes, consid- after PAS staining (pink) at indicated stages. (G) High magnification image. ered as CG specifiers in Xenopus (1). We cloned Pitx1- and Pitx2- The asterisk indicates the PAS-negative adjacent skin. (H) DAPI nuclear type sequences, both of which showed complex, placodal-related fi staining is blue. In all gures, anterior is to the left, and dorsal is up. Cp, expression patterns at neurula stages. Slightly later, when the cas choroid plexus; e, eye; fb, forebrain; hb, hindbrain; mb, midbrain; mhb, midhindbrain boundary; ot, otic vesicle; pi, pineal gland.
Recommended publications
  • A SUMMARY of the LIFE HISTORY and DISTRIBUTION of the SPRING CAVEFISH, Chologaster ]Gassizi, PUTNAM, with POPULATION ESTIMATES for the SPECIES in SOUTHERN ILLINOIS

    A SUMMARY of the LIFE HISTORY and DISTRIBUTION of the SPRING CAVEFISH, Chologaster ]Gassizi, PUTNAM, with POPULATION ESTIMATES for the SPECIES in SOUTHERN ILLINOIS

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship Repository A SUMMARY OF THE LIFE HISTORY AND DISTRIBUTION OF THE SPRING CAVEFISH, Chologaster ]gassizi, PUTNAM, WITH POPULATION ESTIMATES FOR THE SPECIES IN SOUTHERN ILLINOIS PHILIP W. SMITH -NORBERT M. WELCH Biological Notes No.104 Illinois Natural History Survey Urbana, Illinois • May 1978 State of Illinois Department of Registration and Education Natural History Survey Division A Summary of the life History and Distribution of the Spring Cavefish~ Chologasfer agassizi Putnam~ with Population Estimates for the Species in Southern Illinois Philip W. Smith and Norbert M. Welch The genus Chologaster, which means mutilated belly various adaptations and comparative metabolic rates of in reference to the absence of pelvic fins, was proposed all known amblyopsids. The next major contribution to by Agassiz ( 1853: 134) for a new fish found in ditches our knowledge was a series of papers by Hill, who worked and rice fields of South Carolina and described by him with the Warren County, Kentucky, population of spring as C. cornutus. Putnam (1872:30) described a second cave fish and described oxygen preferences ( 1968), food species of the genus found in a well at Lebanon, Tennes­ and feeding habits ( 1969a), effects of isolation upon see, naming it C. agassizi for the author of the generic meristic characters ( 1969b ), and the development of name. Forbes ( 1881:232) reported one specimen of squamation in the young ( 1971). Whittaker & Hill Chologaster from a spring in western Union County, ( 1968) described a new species of cestode parasite, nam­ Illinois, and noted that it differed from known specimens ing it Proteocephalus chologasteri.
  • Evidence for Rapid Phenotypic and Behavioural Shifts in a Recently Established Cavefish Population

    Evidence for Rapid Phenotypic and Behavioural Shifts in a Recently Established Cavefish Population

    applyparastyle “fig//caption/p[1]” parastyle “FigCapt” Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2020, 129, 143–161. With 5 figures. Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/biolinnean/article-abstract/129/1/143/5637080 by University of Minnesota Libraries - Twin Cities user on 13 January 2020 Evidence for rapid phenotypic and behavioural shifts in a recently established cavefish population SUZANNE E. McGAUGH1*, SAM WEAVER1, ERIN N. GILBERTSON1, BRIANNA GARRETT1, MELISSA L. RUDEEN1, STEPHANIE GRIEB1, JENNIFER ROBERTS1, ALEXANDRA DONNY1, PETER MARCHETTO2 and ANDREW G. GLUESENKAMP3 1Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior, University of Minnesota, 140 Gortner Lab, 1479 Gortner Ave, Saint Paul, MN 55108, USA 2Department of Bioproducts and Biosystems Engineering, University of Minnesota, 218 BAE, 1390 Eckles Ave., Saint Paul, MN 55108, USA 3Center for Conservation and Research, San Antonio Zoo, 3903 N St Mary’s St., San Antonio, TX 78212, USA Received 25 August 2019; revised 16 September 2019; accepted for publication 17 September 2019 Cave colonization offers a natural laboratory to study an extreme environmental shift, and diverse cave species from around the world often have converged on robust morphological, physiological and behavioural traits. The Mexican tetra (Astyanax mexicanus) has repeatedly colonized caves in the Sierra de El Abra and Sierra de Guatemala regions of north-east Mexico ~0.20–1 Mya, indicating an ability to adapt to the cave environment. The time frame for the evolution of these traits in any cave animal, however, is poorly understood. Astyanax mexicanus from the Río Grande in South Texas were brought to Central Texas beginning in the early 1900s and colonized underground environments.
  • Evolution of the Nitric Oxide Synthase Family in Vertebrates and Novel

    Evolution of the Nitric Oxide Synthase Family in Vertebrates and Novel

    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.14.448362; this version posted June 14, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 1 Evolution of the nitric oxide synthase family in vertebrates 2 and novel insights in gill development 3 4 Giovanni Annona1, Iori Sato2, Juan Pascual-Anaya3,†, Ingo Braasch4, Randal Voss5, 5 Jan Stundl6,7,8, Vladimir Soukup6, Shigeru Kuratani2,3, 6 John H. Postlethwait9, Salvatore D’Aniello1,* 7 8 1 Biology and Evolution of Marine Organisms, Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn, 80121, 9 Napoli, Italy 10 2 Laboratory for Evolutionary Morphology, RIKEN Center for Biosystems Dynamics 11 Research (BDR), Kobe, 650-0047, Japan 12 3 Evolutionary Morphology Laboratory, RIKEN Cluster for Pioneering Research (CPR), 2-2- 13 3 Minatojima-minami, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 650-0047, Japan 14 4 Department of Integrative Biology and Program in Ecology, Evolution & Behavior (EEB), 15 Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA 16 5 Department of Neuroscience, Spinal Cord and Brain Injury Research Center, and 17 Ambystoma Genetic Stock Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA 18 6 Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech 19 Republic 20 7 Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, 21 Pasadena, CA, USA 22 8 South Bohemian Research Center of Aquaculture and Biodiversity of Hydrocenoses, 23 Faculty of Fisheries and Protection of Waters, University of South Bohemia in Ceske 24 Budejovice, Vodnany, Czech Republic 25 9 Institute of Neuroscience, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403, USA 26 † Present address: Department of Animal Biology, Faculty of Sciences, University of 27 Málaga; and Andalusian Centre for Nanomedicine and Biotechnology (BIONAND), 28 Málaga, Spain 29 30 * Correspondence: [email protected] 31 32 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.14.448362; this version posted June 14, 2021.
  • Making a Big Splash with Louisiana Fishes

    Making a Big Splash with Louisiana Fishes

    Making a Big Splash with Louisiana Fishes Written and Designed by Prosanta Chakrabarty, Ph.D., Sophie Warny, Ph.D., and Valerie Derouen LSU Museum of Natural Science To those young people still discovering their love of nature... Note to parents, teachers, instructors, activity coordinators and to all the fishermen in us: This book is a companion piece to Making a Big Splash with Louisiana Fishes, an exhibit at Louisiana State Universi- ty’s Museum of Natural Science (MNS). Located in Foster Hall on the main campus of LSU, this exhibit created in 2012 contains many of the elements discussed in this book. The MNS exhibit hall is open weekdays, from 8 am to 4 pm, when the LSU campus is open. The MNS visits are free of charge, but call our main office at 225-578-2855 to schedule a visit if your group includes 10 or more students. Of course the book can also be enjoyed on its own and we hope that you will enjoy it on your own or with your children or students. The book and exhibit was funded by the Louisiana Board Of Regents, Traditional Enhancement Grant - Education: Mak- ing a Big Splash with Louisiana Fishes: A Three-tiered Education Program and Museum Exhibit. Funding was obtained by LSUMNS Curators’ Sophie Warny and Prosanta Chakrabarty who designed the exhibit with Southwest Museum Services who built it in 2012. The oarfish in the exhibit was created by Carolyn Thome of the Smithsonian, and images exhibited here are from Curator Chakrabarty unless noted elsewhere (see Appendix II).
  • Biology of Subterranean Fishes

    Biology of Subterranean Fishes

    CHAPTER 7 Subterranean Fishes of North America: Amblyopsidae Matthew L. Niemiller1 and Thomas L. Poulson2 1Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, 37996, USA E-mail: [email protected] 2Emeritus Professor, University of Illinois-Chicago E-mail: [email protected] INTRODUCTION The Amblyopsid cavefi shes, family Amblyopsidae, have been viewed as a model system for studying the ecological and evolutionary processes of cave adaptation because the four cave-restricted species in the family represent a range of troglomorphy that refl ect variable durations of isolation in caves (Poulson 1963, Poulson and White 1969). This group has both intrigued and excited biologists since the discovery and description of Amblyopsis spelaea, the fi rst troglobitic fi sh ever described, in the early 1840s. Other than the Mexican cavefi sh (Astyanax fasciatus), cave Amblyopsids are the most comprehensively studied troglobitic fi shes (Poulson, this volume). The Amblyopsidae (Fig. 1) includes species with some unique features for all cavefi sh. Typhlichthys subterraneus is the most widely distributed of any cavefi sh species. Its distribution spans more than 5° of latitude and 1 million km2 (Proudlove 2006). Amblyopsis spelaea is the only cavefi sh known to incubate eggs in its gill chamber. In fact, this species is the only one of the approximately 1100 species in North America with this behavior. The Amblyopsidae is the most specious family of subterranean fi shes in the United States containing four of the eight species recognized. Two other © 2010 by Science Publishers 170 Biology of Subterranean Fishes Fig. 1 Members of the Amblyopsidae. The family includes (A) the surface- dwelling swampfi sh (Chologaster cornuta), (B) the troglophile spring cavefi sh (Forbesichthys agassizii), and four troglobites: (C) the southern cavefi sh (Typhlichthys subterraneus), (D) the northern cavefi sh (Amblyopsis spelaea), (E) the Ozark cavefi sh (A.
  • Fish Overview

    Fish Overview

    The Toledo Zoo/ThinkingWorks Teacher Overview for the Fish Lessons Ó2003 Teacher Overview: Fish Fish have many traits that are unique to this particular class of animals. Below is a list of general fish traits to help you and your students complete the ThinkingWorks menu. This lesson focuses on typical fish that most people are familiar with, not on atypical fish such as seahorses. Fish are divided into three groups or classes, each with its own set of features. These classes include the bony fish (e.g., tuna and bass), cartilaginous fish (e.g., sharks and rays) and jawless fish (e.g., lampreys). We have included a list of the different fish found at The Toledo Zoo. Most of the fish are found in the Aquarium but there are also fish in the Diversity of Life. Note that animals move constantly in and out of the Zoo so the list below may be inaccurate. Please call the Zoo for a current list of fish that are on exhibit and their locations. Typical Fish Traits Lightweight, strong scales Lateral line for detecting for protection changes in turbulence along a fish as well as changes in water pressure Gas bladder for buoyancy, stability (internal) Symmetrical tail for Most fish have a well powerful swimming developed eye for locating prey, detecting predators and finding a mate. Flexible “lips” for picking up food Gills for extracting oxygen from the water Maneuverable, paired fins for Lightweight, strong moving forward and controlling skeleton for support roll, pitch and yaw q Fish are cold-blooded, obtaining heat from the surrounding water.
  • The Genome 10K Project: a Way Forward

    The Genome 10K Project: a Way Forward

    The Genome 10K Project: A Way Forward Klaus-Peter Koepfli,1 Benedict Paten,2 the Genome 10K Community of Scientists,Ã and Stephen J. O’Brien1,3 1Theodosius Dobzhansky Center for Genome Bioinformatics, St. Petersburg State University, 199034 St. Petersburg, Russian Federation; email: [email protected] 2Department of Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Santa Cruz, California 95064 3Oceanographic Center, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33004 Annu. Rev. Anim. Biosci. 2015. 3:57–111 Keywords The Annual Review of Animal Biosciences is online mammal, amphibian, reptile, bird, fish, genome at animal.annualreviews.org This article’sdoi: Abstract 10.1146/annurev-animal-090414-014900 The Genome 10K Project was established in 2009 by a consortium of Copyright © 2015 by Annual Reviews. biologists and genome scientists determined to facilitate the sequencing All rights reserved and analysis of the complete genomes of10,000vertebratespecies.Since Access provided by Rockefeller University on 01/10/18. For personal use only. ÃContributing authors and affiliations are listed then the number of selected and initiated species has risen from ∼26 Annu. Rev. Anim. Biosci. 2015.3:57-111. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org at the end of the article. An unabridged list of G10KCOS is available at the Genome 10K website: to 277 sequenced or ongoing with funding, an approximately tenfold http://genome10k.org. increase in five years. Here we summarize the advances and commit- ments that have occurred by mid-2014 and outline the achievements and present challenges of reaching the 10,000-species goal. We summarize the status of known vertebrate genome projects, recommend standards for pronouncing a genome as sequenced or completed, and provide our present and futurevision of the landscape of Genome 10K.
  • Bennett DH and RW Mcfarlane. the Fishes of the Sava

    Bennett DH and RW Mcfarlane. the Fishes of the Sava

    NRC000013 ..,."'- '~_."'_~:-:\"'-'- IJ;;,~~;.·~·"" &.J. __";:' ",?\;:i\:~ ~" .• "'~- .J":. V{,W.(Z'6- '1\ SRO-NERP-12 1 Plant: I '\ , ;' '~":' ) ./ . ) J ....-----------NOTICE---------__ This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by the United States Government. Neither the United States nor the United States Depart­ ment of Energy. nor any of their contractors, subcontractors, or their employ­ ees, makes any warranty. express or implied or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. A PUBLICATION OF DOE'S SAVANNAH RIVER PLANT NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH PARK Copies may be obtained from Savannah River Ecology Laboratory THE FISHES OF THE SAVANNAH RIVER PLANT: NATION:AL ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH PARK by 1 David H. Bennett Savannah River Ecology Laboratory University of Georgia and 2 / Robert w. McFarlane Savannah River Ecology Laboratory and Savannah River Laboratory E. I. duPont de Nemours and Co. Aiken, South Carolina 29801 lAssociate Professor, Fishery Resources, College of Forestry, Wildlife and Range Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho 83843 2Environmental Scientist, Brown &Root, Inc., P. O. Box 3, Houston, Texas 77001 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Subject Page Introduction 4 The Savannah River Plant 6 Groundwater and Surface Water 10 Aquatic Habitat Types 11 Historical Aspects 17 Collection of Samples 19 Measurements 20 / Species Accounts 25
  • Title the Mitochondrial Phylogeny of an Ancient Lineage of Ray- Finned Fishes (Polypteridae) with Implications for the Evolution

    Title the Mitochondrial Phylogeny of an Ancient Lineage of Ray- Finned Fishes (Polypteridae) with Implications for the Evolution

    The mitochondrial phylogeny of an ancient lineage of ray- finned fishes (Polypteridae) with implications for the evolution Title of body elongation, pelvic fin loss, and craniofacial morphology in Osteichthyes. Author(s) Suzuki, Dai; Brandley, Matthew C; Tokita, Masayoshi Citation BMC evolutionary biology (2010), 10(1) Issue Date 2010 URL http://hdl.handle.net/2433/108263 c 2010 Suzuki et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Right Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Type Journal Article Textversion publisher Kyoto University Suzuki et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2010, 10:21 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/10/21 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access The mitochondrial phylogeny of an ancient lineage of ray-finned fishes (Polypteridae) with implications for the evolution of body elongation, pelvic fin loss, and craniofacial morphology in Osteichthyes Dai Suzuki1, Matthew C Brandley2, Masayoshi Tokita1,3* Abstract Background: The family Polypteridae, commonly known as “bichirs”, is a lineage that diverged early in the evolutionary history of Actinopterygii (ray-finned fish), but has been the subject of far less evolutionary study than other members of that clade. Uncovering patterns of morphological change within Polypteridae provides an important opportunity to evaluate if the mechanisms underlying morphological evolution are shared among actinoptyerygians, and in fact, perhaps the entire osteichthyan (bony fish and tetrapods) tree of life. However, the greatest impediment to elucidating these patterns is the lack of a well-resolved, highly-supported phylogenetic tree of Polypteridae.
  • The Polycomb Orthologues in Teleost Fishes and Their Expression in the Zebrafish Model

    The Polycomb Orthologues in Teleost Fishes and Their Expression in the Zebrafish Model

    G C A T T A C G G C A T genes Article The Polycomb Orthologues in Teleost Fishes and Their Expression in the Zebrafish Model Ludivine Raby, Pamela Völkel, Xuefen Le Bourhis and Pierre-Olivier Angrand * University Lille, CNRS, Inserm, CHU Lille, Centre Oscar Lambret, UMR 9020 - UMR 1277 - Canther - Cancer Heterogeneity, Plasticity and Resistance to Therapies, F-59000 Lille, France; [email protected] (L.R.); [email protected] (P.V.); [email protected] (X.L.B.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: + 33-320-336-222 Received: 21 February 2020; Accepted: 26 March 2020; Published: 27 March 2020 Abstract: The Polycomb Repressive Complex 1 (PRC1) is a chromatin-associated protein complex involved in transcriptional repression of hundreds of genes controlling development and differentiation processes, but also involved in cancer and stem cell biology. Within the canonical PRC1, members of Pc/CBX protein family are responsible for the targeting of the complex to specific gene loci. In mammals, the Pc/CBX protein family is composed of five members generating, through mutual exclusion, different PRC1 complexes with potentially distinct cellular functions. Here, we performed a global analysis of the cbx gene family in 68 teleost species and traced the distribution of the cbx genes through teleost evolution in six fish super-orders. We showed that after the teleost-specific whole genome duplication, cbx4, cbx7 and cbx8 are retained as pairs of ohnologues. In contrast, cbx2 and cbx6 are present as pairs of ohnologues in the genome of several teleost clades but as singletons in others.
  • Northern Cavefish (Amblyopsis Spelaea)

    Northern Cavefish (Amblyopsis Spelaea)

    Indiana Division of Fish and Wildlife’s Animal Information Series Northern Cavefish (Amblyopsis spelaea) Do they have any other names? The northern cavefish is also known as northern blindfish. Why are they called northern cavefish? They are called northern cavefish because they are only found in cave streams and this species is found north of the habitats of other species of cavefish. Amblyopsis is Greek for “insensible vision.” What do they look like? Northern cavefish are small, eyeless fish that are white-clear in color due to lack of pigments in their skin. These fish have no eyes or skin pigments due to the complete darkness of the cave streams; eyes were not used and so slowly stopped developing in new generations through many years. Also, because of the darkness, camouflage is not needed to avoid predation. Northern cavefish have small pelvic fins, unlike most cavefishes which do not have pelvic fins. They also have rows of sensory papillae on their skin that help them to navigate their environment without light. Photo Credit: Indiana DNR 2012-MLC Page 1 Where do they live in Indiana? Northern cavefish are only found in southern Indiana and north central Kentucky. They live in the following Indiana cave streams: -Wesley Chapel Gulf Cave System in Orange County -Pioneer Mother’s Spring -Dillon and Springs Spring Caves in Orange County -Henshaw Bend Cave in Lawrence County -Wyandotte Caves State Recreation Area -Bronson-Donaldson Cave System in Spring Mill State Park in Lawrence County -a few other caves in the Hoosier National Forest Northern cavefish are not found north of the East Fork of the White River and are not found south of the Mammoth Caves in Kentucky.
  • Loss of Schooling Behavior in Cavefish Through Sight-Dependent

    Loss of Schooling Behavior in Cavefish Through Sight-Dependent

    Current Biology 23, 1874–1883, October 7, 2013 ª2013 Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2013.07.056 Article Loss of Schooling Behavior in Cavefish through Sight-Dependent and Sight-Independent Mechanisms Johanna E. Kowalko,1 Nicolas Rohner,1 the lateral line have been implicated in schooling behavior Santiago B. Rompani,2 Brant K. Peterson,3 Tess A. Linden,1,3 [2, 8, 9]. Masato Yoshizawa,4,7 Emily H. Kay,3 Jesse Weber,5 Little is known about how schooling behavior evolves, with Hopi E. Hoekstra,3 William R. Jeffery,4 Richard Borowsky,6 the exception of studies in laboratory strains of zebrafish and Clifford J. Tabin1,* [10]. The Mexican tetra, Astyanax mexicanus, provides an 1Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, excellent opportunity to examine this question. A. mexicanus MA 02115, USA exists in two forms, a sighted surface-dwelling form and a 2Neural Circuit Laboratories, Friedrich Miescher Institute for blind cave-dwelling form. Morphological adaptations to life Biomedical Research, 4058 Basel, Switzerland in the caves include an increased number and distribution of 3Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, taste buds and cranial superficial neuromasts, regressed Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, and Museum eyes, and decreased or absent melanin pigmentation of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, Cambridge, [11–13]. Cavefish also have a variety of modified behaviors, MA 02138, USA including decreases in aggression and in time spent sleeping, 4Department of Biology, University of Maryland, College Park, a depressed response to alarm substance, an enhanced MD 20742, USA attraction to vibrations in their environment, modified feeding 5Section of Integrative Biology, Howard Hughes Medical behaviors, and the absence of schooling [14–19].