DOCSLIB.ORG

Department of Agriculture - Environmental Services Division

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Department of Agriculture - Environmental Services Division 3 A.A.C. 3 Supp. 19-3 This Chapter contains rule Sections that were filed to be codified in the Arizona Administrative Code between the dates of July 1, 2019 through September 30, 2019 Title 3 TITLE 3. AGRICULTURE CHAPTER 3. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE - ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION The table of contents on the first page contains quick links to the referenced page numbers in this Chapter. Refer to the notes at the end of a Section to learn about the history of a rule as it was published in the Arizona Administrative Register. Sections, Parts, Exhibits, Tables or Appendices codified in this supplement. The list provided contains quick links to the updated rules. R3-3-702. Pesticide Registration; Fee ................................. 24 Questions about these rules? Contact: Name: Jack Peterson, Associate Director Address: Arizona Department of Agriculture 1688 W. Adams Phoenix, AZ 85007 Telephone: (602) 542-3575 Fax: (602) 542-0466 E-mail: [email protected] The release of this Chapter in Supp. 19-3 replaces Supp. 18-3, 1-51 pages Please note that the Chapter you are about to replace may have rules still in effect after the publication date of this supplement. Therefore, all superseded material should be retained in a separate binder and archived for future reference. i PREFACE Under Arizona law, the Department of State, Office of the Secretary of State (Office), accepts state agency rule filings and is the publisher of Arizona rules. The Office of the Secretary of State does not interpret or enforce rules in the Administrative Code. Questions about rules should be directed to the state agency responsible for the promulgation of the rule. Scott Cancelosi, Director ADMINISTRATIVE RULES DIVISION note to make rules is often included at the beginning of a chapter. RULES Other Arizona statutes may be referenced in rule under the A.R.S. The definition for a rule is provided for under A.R.S. § 41-1001. acronym. “‘Rule’ means an agency statement of general applicability that implements, interprets, or prescribes law or policy, or describes SESSION LAW REFERENCES the procedures or practice requirements of an agency.” Arizona Session Law references in a chapter can be found at the Secretary of State’s website, under Services-> Legislative Fil- THE ADMINISTRATIVE CODE ings. The Arizona Administrative Code is where the official rules of the state of Arizona are published. The Code is the official codifica- EXEMPTIONS FROM THE APA tion of rules that govern state agencies, boards, and commissions. It is not uncommon for an agency to be exempt from the steps outlined in the rulemaking process as specified in the Arizona The Code is separated by subject into titles. Titles are divided into Administrative Procedures Act, also known as the APA (Arizona chapters. A chapter includes state agency rules. Rules in chapters Revised Statutes, Title 41, Chapter 6, Articles 1 through 10). are divided into Articles, then Sections. The “R” stands for “rule” Other agencies may be given an exemption to certain provisions with a sequential numbering and lettering outline separated into of the Act. subsections. An agency’s exemption is written in law by the Arizona State Rules are codified quarterly in the Code. Supplement release Legislature or under a referendum or initiative passed into law by dates are printed on the footers of each chapter. Arizona voters. First Quarter: January 1 - March 31 Second Quarter: April 1 - June 30 When an agency files an exempt rulemaking package with our Third Quarter: July 1 - September 30 Office it specifies the law exemption in what is called the pre- Fourth Quarter: October 1 - December 31 amble of rulemaking. The preamble is published in the Register For example, the first supplement for the first quarter of 2019 is online at www.azsos.gov/rules, click on the Administrative Reg- cited as Supp. 19-1. ister link. Please note: The Office publishes by chapter, not by individual Editor’s notes at the beginning of a chapter provide information rule section. Therefore there might be only a few sections codi- about rulemaking sections made by exempt rulemaking. Exempt fied in each chapter released in a supplement. Historical notes at rulemaking notes are also included in the historical note at the end the end of a section provide an effective date and information of a rulemaking Section. when a rule was last updated. The Office makes a distinction to certain exemptions because AUTHENTICATION OF PDF CODE CHAPTERS some rules are made without receiving input from stakeholders or The Office began to authenticate chapters of the Administrative the public. Other exemptions may require an agency to propose Code in Supp. 18-1 to comply with A.R.S. § 41-1012(B) and exempt rules at a public hearing. A.R.S. § 5302(1), (2)(d) through (e), and (3)(d) through (e). EXEMPTIONS AND PAPER COLOR A certification verifies the authenticity of each Code chapter At one time the office published exempt rules on either blue or posted as it is released by the Office of the Secretary of State. The green paper. Blue meant the authority of the exemption was given authenticated pdf of the Code includes an integrity mark with a by the Legislature; green meant the authority was determined by a certificate ID. Users should check the validity of the signature, court order. In 2001 the Office discontinued publishing rules especially if the pdf has been downloaded. If the digital signature using these paper colors. is invalid it means the document’s content has been compro- mised. PERSONAL USE/COMMERCIAL USE This chapter is posted as a public courtesy online, and is for HOW TO USE THE CODE private use only. Those who wish to use the contents for resale or Rules may be in effect before a supplement is released by the profit should contact the Office about Commercial Use fees. For Office. Therefore, the user should refer to issues of the Arizona information on commercial use fees review A.R.S. § 39-121.03 Administrative Register for recent updates to rule Sections. and 1 A.A.C. 1, R1-1-113. ARIZONA REVISED STATUTE REFERENCES Rhonda Paschal, managing rules editor, assisted with the editing The Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.) are available online at the of this chapter. Legislature’s website, www.azleg.gov. An agency’s authority ii Arizona Administrative Code 3 A.A.C. 3 Administrative Rules Division The Arizona Secretary of State electronically publishes each A.A.C. Chapter with a digital certificate. The certificate-based signature displays the date and time the document was signed and can be validated in Adobe Acrobat Reader. TITLE 3. AGRICULTURE CHAPTER 3. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE - ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION Authority: A.R.S. §§ 3-341 et seq. and 3-3101 et seq. Title 3, Chapter 3, Article 1, Section R3-3-101 renumbered from Title 3, Chapter 10, Article 1, Section R3-10-101; Title 3, Chapter 3, Article 2, Sections R3-3-201 through R3-3-212 renumbered from Title 3, Chapter 10, Article 2, Sections R3-10-201 through R3-10-212; Title 3, Chapter 3, Article 3, Sections R3-3-301 through R3-3-314 renumbered from Title 3, Chapter 10, Article 2, Sections R3-10-301 through R3-10-314; Title 3, Chapter 3, Article 4, Sections R3-3-401 through R3-3-404 renumbered from Title 3, Chapter 10, Article 4, Sections R3- 10-401 through R3-10-404; Title 3, Chapter 3, Article 5, Sections R3-3-501 through R3-3-506 renumbered from Title 3, Chapter 10, Article 5, Sections R3-10-501 through R3-10-506; Title 3, Chapter 3, Article 6, Sections R3-3-601 through R3-3-617 renumbered from Title 3, Chap- ter 10, Article 6, Sections R3-10-601 through R3-10-617; Title 3, Chapter 3, Article 7, Sections R3-3-701 through R3-3-712 renumbered from Title 3, Chapter 3, Article 1, Sections R3-3-01 through R3-3-12; Title 3, Chapter 3, Article 8, Sections R3-3-801 through R3-3-812 renumbered from Title 3, Chapter 3, Article 2, Sections R3-3-21 through R3-3-32; Title 3, Chapter 3, Article 9, Sections R3-3-901 through R3-3-916 renumbered to Title 3, Chapter 3, Article 3, Sections R3-3-41 through R3-3-56 (Supp. 91-4). New Sections R3-10-101, R3-10-201 through R3-10-212, R3-10-301 through R3-10-306, R3-10-308 through R3-10-312, R3-10-401 through R3-10-403, R3-10-501 through R3-10-505, and R3-10-601 through R3-10-617 adopted effective November 20, 1987. Former Sections R3-10-01, R3-10-03, R3-10-20 through R3-10-25, R3-10-40 through R3-10-42, R3-10-42.01, R3-10-43 through R3- 10-62, R3-10-64 through R3-10-66, R3-10-70, R3-10-71, R3-10-73 through R3-10-75, R3-10-77 through R3-10-87, R3-10-89, and R3-10-91 repealed effective November 20, 1987. ARTICLE 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS R3-3-308. Pesticide Containers and Pesticides; Storage and Disposal ..............................................................18 Section R3-3-309. Returnable, Reusable, Recyclable, and R3-3-101. Definitions ........................................................... 3 Reconditionable Pesticide Containers ................18 R3-3-102. Licensing Time-frames ........................................ 5 R3-3-310. Fumigation Use ..................................................18 Table 1. Time-frames (Calendar Days) ............................. 6 R3-3-311. Repealed .............................................................19 ARTICLE 2. PERMITS, LICENSES, AND CERTIFICATION R3-3-312. Renumbered ........................................................19 R3-3-313. Renumbered ........................................................19 Section R3-3-314. Renumbered ........................................................19 R3-3-201. Regulated Grower Permit; Fee ...........................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Campanulaceae): Review, Phylogenetic and Biogeographic Analyses
    PhytoKeys 174: 13–45 (2021) A peer-reviewed open-access journal doi: 10.3897/phytokeys.174.59555 RESEARCH ARTICLE https://phytokeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Systematics of Lobelioideae (Campanulaceae): review, phylogenetic and biogeographic analyses Samuel Paul Kagame1,2,3, Andrew W. Gichira1,3, Ling-Yun Chen1,4, Qing-Feng Wang1,3 1 Key Laboratory of Plant Germplasm Enhancement and Specialty Agriculture, Wuhan Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430074, China 2 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China 3 Sino-Africa Joint Research Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430074, China 4 State Key Laboratory of Natural Medicines, Jiangsu Key Laboratory of TCM Evaluation and Translational Research, School of Traditional Chinese Pharmacy, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing 211198, China Corresponding author: Ling-Yun Chen ([email protected]); Qing-Feng Wang ([email protected]) Academic editor: C. Morden | Received 12 October 2020 | Accepted 1 February 2021 | Published 5 March 2021 Citation: Kagame SP, Gichira AW, Chen L, Wang Q (2021) Systematics of Lobelioideae (Campanulaceae): review, phylogenetic and biogeographic analyses. PhytoKeys 174: 13–45. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.174.59555 Abstract Lobelioideae, the largest subfamily within Campanulaceae, includes 33 genera and approximately1200 species. It is characterized by resupinate flowers with zygomorphic corollas and connate anthers and is widely distributed across the world. The systematics of Lobelioideae has been quite challenging over the years, with different scholars postulating varying theories. To outline major progress and highlight the ex- isting systematic problems in Lobelioideae, we conducted a literature review on this subfamily. Addition- ally, we conducted phylogenetic and biogeographic analyses for Lobelioideae using plastids and internal transcribed spacer regions.
    [Show full text]
  • THE YOLO GARDENER Spring 2020
    THE YOLO GARDENER Spring 2020 A QUARTERLY PUBLICATION BY THE UCCE. MASTER GARDENERS OF YOLO COUNTY Woodland Community College Plant Sale Sue Fitz, UCCE Master Gardener, Yolo County Editors Note: Due to the Corona virus this event may be postponed. Please check our website: https://ucanr.edu/sites/YCMG for updated information. ne of the best kept garden secrets in Yolo County is the spring and fall plant sales at Woodland O Community College. Held the first two Saturday mornings in both April and October, the sales are a joint venture between the College’s horticultural program, the UCCE Master Gardeners of Yolo County, and the horticultural program at Woodland High School. Each group specializes in a particular type of plant, so there is a wide range of plants to choose from. The college mainly concentrates on providing vegetable plants, mostly in four-inch pots. The spring sale offerings are multiple varieties of the usual suspects- tomatoes, peppers, eggplants, squash and melons, as well as a large selection of herbs, and less common vegetables like tomatillos, okra, pumpkins and gourds. Depending on student interests, they may also offer annual and perennial flowers. UCCE Master Gardeners from Yolo County offer a wide range of drought -tolerant landscape plants in one-gallon pots. Master Gardeners are plant-crazy people, they scour nurseries near and far to find the best and coolest plants to grow for themselves. They then donate cuttings from their gardens for propagation for the plant sale, so you can be sure to find something interesting and rarely seen when you shop.
    [Show full text]
  • Drought Tolerant Plants
    GROUND COVER City of Kerman Watering Schedule Water Usage Acacia redolens ‘Desert Carpet' (Landscape Watering, Car Washing) (Dwarf Prostrate Acacia) March 2 - November 30 Odd Numbe: Achillea species (Yarrow) Houses Ending With (1, 3, 5, 7, 9) Baccharis species (Coyote Brush) Water On: Tuesday-Saturday Cotoneaster dammeri (Bearberry Before 6am, Between 8am Cotoneaster) and Noon, After 7pm Even Number: Lampranthus species (Ice Plant) Houses Ending With (2, 4, 6, 8, 0) Lantana montevidensis (Trailing Water On: Wednesday-Sunday Lantana) Before 6am, Between 8am Myoporum parvifolium (Myoporum) and Noon, After 7pm NO WATERING ON MONDAYS, THURSDAYS, FRIDAYS TREES AT ANY TIME!! WATER December 1 - March 1 CONSERVATION Odd Number: Arbutus unedo (Strawberry Tree) Houses Ending With (1, 3, 5, 7, 9) LOW-WATER Chitalpa tashkentensis (Chitalpa) Water On: Saturday Only DROUGHT-RESISTANT Geijera parviflora (Australian Willow) Even Number: Houses Ending With (2, 4, 6, 8, 0) PLANTS Laurus nobilis (Sweet Bay) Water On: Sunday Only Olea europaea ‘Swan Hill' (Swan Hill PLEASE DO NOT OVER IRRIGATE, 850 S. Madera Avenue Olive) Kerman CA 93630 City of Kerman Water Conservation Program Phone: (559) 846-9372 Pinus eldarica (Afghan Pine) would like to Thank You for following this watering or (559) 846-6159 schedule Fax: (559) 842-6159 If You Have Any Questions or Need Help E-mail: [email protected] Call 559-846-9372 or visit www.cityofkerman.net LOW-WATER/DROUGHT- RESISTANT PLANTS Using low-water and drought-resistant plants can significantly reduce your outdoor water usage. The plants listed below are appropriate for California's climate and use less water than what you may already have in your garden.
    [Show full text]
  • Floral Traits, Pollinator Behavior, and Plant Reproduction
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2007 Floral traits, pollinator behavior, and plant reproduction: tests of natural and sexual selection in the hummingbird-pollinated herb Chrysothemis friedrichsthaliana Jane Elizabeth Carlson Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Recommended Citation Carlson, Jane Elizabeth, "Floral traits, pollinator behavior, and plant reproduction: tests of natural and sexual selection in the hummingbird-pollinated herb Chrysothemis friedrichsthaliana" (2007). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 1813. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/1813 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. FLORAL TRAITS, POLLINATOR BEHAVIOR, AND PLANT REPRODUCTION: TESTS OF NATURAL AND SEXUAL SELECTION IN THE HUMMINGBIRD-POLLINATED HERB CHRYSOTHEMIS FRIEDRICHSTHALIANA A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree in Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of Biological Sciences by Jane Elizabeth Carlson B.S., Cornell University, 2002 August 2007 Acknowledgements This dissertation was only possible because I was aided by many excellent scientists, students and collaborators. Foremost among these is my major professor, Kyle Harms. Kyle allowed me to think and work independently, yet was unfailing in his interest, encouragement and support. If future co-workers have only a few of the professional mannerisms that so distinctly characterize Kyle, I shall consider myself extremely fortunate to be a scientist.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change and the Hummingbirds of the Monteverde Cloud Forest, Costa Rica
    Tropical Science Center Research Program Climate Change and the Hummingbirds of the Monteverde Cloud Forest, Costa Rica Panterpe insignis, F. Zeledón, INBio Elizabeth Deliso September 2007 Climate Change and the Hummingbirds of the Monteverde Cloud Forest, Costa Rica Deliso Elizabeth. Climate Change and the Hummingbirds of the Monteverde Cloud Forest, Costa Rica / Centro Científico Tropical. – 1 ed.- San José, C.R.: 2008. 42 p.: 22 X 28 cms. 1. Hummingbirds – Cloud Forest. 2. Climate Change. 3. Monteverde – Costa Rica. I Título Título: Climate Change and the Hummingbirds of the Monteverde Cloud Forest, Costa Rica Autor: Elizabeth Deliso Revisión del texto y formato: Olivier Chassot, Centro Científico Tropical Citar como: Deliso Elizabeth. 2008. Climate Change and the Hummingbirds of the Monteverde Cloud Forest, Costa Rica. San José, C.R.: Centro Científico Tropical, 42 p. Extractos de esta publicación pueden citarse sin previa autorización con la condición de que se mencione la fuente. E. Deliso 2 Climate Change and the Hummingbirds of the Monteverde Cloud Forest, Costa Rica Contents Chapter 1: Hummingbird Ecology and Climate Change 5 HUMMINGBIRDS OF MONTEVERDE 5 Background 5 Recent Changes in Avian Populations 6 PLANTS AND HUMMINGBIRDS 6 Co-evolution 6 Hummingbird Effects on Plants 7 Foraging Behavior 9 Nectar Effects on Hummingbird Behavior 10 Life Cycle & Timing 11 CLIMATE & PLANTS 12 Hydrology: Water & Humidity 12 Temperature 13 Clouds & Light 13 Elevation 13 Plant Genetics and Variability 13 Timing 14 Spatial Position 14 CLIMATE
    [Show full text]
  • County of Riverside Friendly Plant List
    ATTACHMENT A COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CALIFORNIA FRIENDLY PLANT LIST PLANT LIST KEY WUCOLS III (Water Use Classification of Landscape Species) WUCOLS Region Sunset Zones 1 2,3,14,15,16,17 2 8,9 3 22,23,24 4 18,19,20,21 511 613 WUCOLS III Water Usage/ Average Plant Factor Key H-High (0.8) M-Medium (0.5) L-Low (.2) VL-Very Low (0.1) * Water use for this plant material was not listed in WUCOLS III, but assumed in comparison to plants of similar species ** Zones for this plant material were not listed in Sunset, but assumed in comparison to plants of similar species *** Zones based on USDA zones ‡ The California Friendly Plant List is provided to serve as a general guide for plant material. Riverside County has multiple Sunset Zones as well as microclimates within those zones which can affect plant viability and mature size. As such, plants and use categories listed herein are not exhaustive, nor do they constitute automatic approval; all proposed plant material is subject to review by the County. In some cases where a broad genus or species is called out within the list, there may be multiple species or cultivars that may (or may not) be appropriate. The specific water needs and sizes of cultivars should be verified by the designer. Site specific conditions should be taken into consideration in determining appropriate plant material. This includes, but is not limited to, verifying soil conditions affecting erosion, site specific and Fire Department requirements or restrictions affecting plans for fuel modifications zones, and site specific conditions near MSHCP areas.
    [Show full text]
  • “Deer Resistant” Plant Guide
    Orchard Gro-Sheet #0 “Deer Resistant” Plant Guide Deer, like all animals, have certain food preferences and dislikes. Home gardeners living near deer habitat can often take advantage of this fact by using deer- resistant plants for ornamental planting. The use of deer-resistant plants to minimize damage from browsing has a number of advantages for the home gardener. Perhaps the principal advantages over the more conventional methods of deer-damage control are those of economy and beauty. High deer fences are unsightly and expensive, and noise or odor repellants are often out of place on home grounds. But, deer-resistant plants can be pleasing to the eye and to the pocket book: they provide their own protec- tion and when properly chosen and landscaped, produce excellent results for the home gardener. Resistance of the plant to deer is related to the availability of other food. If there is an adequate supply of natural browse in the deer’s usual feeding ground, the gardener’s ornamental plantings may be largely untouched; if natural food supplies are low, there will be an increased browsing in domestic gardens; if there is an extreme shortage of natural food, few if any plant species are totally resistant to deer. A heavy deer population also increases competition for food, with the result that plants relatively unpalatable in an area where deer are not numerous will be readily browsed in an area where deer abound. Various factors can make a plant resistant to deer. Many of the most resistant plants (such as Oleander) are poisonous, some at all times and others only at certain stages of growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Shrub Plant List
    Shrub Plant List California Botanical Name Common Name Water Use Native Abutilon palmeri Indian mallow Low X Acacia aneura mulga Low Acacia boormanii Snowy River wattle Low Acacia constricta whitethorn acacia Low Acacia covenyi blue bush Low Acacia cultriformis knife acacia Low Acacia greggii catclaw acacia Low X Acacia iteaphylla willow wattle Low Acacia longifolia Sydney golden wattle Low Acacia podalyriifolia pearl acacia Very Low Acacia redolens prostrate acacia Very Low Acacia saligna blue leaf wattle Low Acacia vestita hairy wattle Low Acca sellowiana (Feijoa sellowiana) pineapple guava Low Adenostoma fasciculatum chamise Very Low X Agave americana (thick-leaved relatives) agave Very Low Agave attenuata (thin-leaved relatives) agave Low Aloe spp. (CA native, non-native) aloe Low X Aloysia triphylla lemon verbena Low Alyogyne huegelii blue hibiscus Low Ambrosia deltoidea triangleleaf bursage Low Arbutus unedo strawberry tree Low Arctostaphylos 'Austin Griffiths' Austin Griffiths manzanita Low X Arctostaphylos 'John Dourley' John Dourley manzanita Low X Arctostaphylos 'Lester Rowntree' Lester Rountree manzanita Low X Arctostaphylos 'Sunset' Sunset manzanita Low X Arctostaphylos bakeri 'Louis Edmunds' Louis Edmunds manzanita Low X manzanita cvs., e.g., Howard Arctostaphylos densiflora cvs. Low X McMinn Arctostaphylos hookeri 'Wayside' Wayside manzanita Low X Arctostaphylos hookeri (shrub cvs.) manzanita (shrub cvs.) Low X Arctostaphylos manzanita common manzanita Very Low X manzanita cvs., Dr. Hurd, St. Arctostaphylos manzanita cvs. Very Low X Helena Arctostaphylos pajaroensis cvs. Pajaro manzanita Low X Arctostaphylos rudis cvs. shagbark manzanita Low X Arctostaphylos viscida whiteleaf manzanita Low X Aronia arbutifolia 'Brilliantissima' red chokeberry Low Artemisia californica California sagebrush Low X Artemisia filifolia sand sagebrush Low Artemisia spp.
    [Show full text]
  • Higher Level Phylogeny and Evolutionary Trends in Campanulaceae Subfam
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 46 (2008) 1–18 www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Higher level phylogeny and evolutionary trends in Campanulaceae subfam. Lobelioideae: Molecular signal overshadows morphology Alexandre Antonelli * Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Go¨teborg University, P.O. Box 461, SE-405 30 Go¨teborg, Sweden Received 20 April 2006; revised 15 June 2007; accepted 18 June 2007 Available online 30 June 2007 Abstract Relationships within the subfamily Lobelioideae in Campanulaceae are inferred from DNA sequence variation in the rbcL and ndhF genes, and the trnL–F region including the trnL intron and the trnL–F intergenic spacer. Results derived from Bayesian and parsimony analyses provide evidence for the long-suspected paraphyly of the genus Lobelia, comprising over 400 species as presently circumscribed. The perennial dwarf herbs belonging to the Andean genus Lysipomia are sister to a group comprising the Neotropical shrubs Burmeis- tera, Centropogon, and Siphocampylus. Giant lobelioids from the Hawaiian Islands, Brazil, Africa, and Sri Lanka form a strongly sup- ported group. Character optimizations on the phylogenetic tree reveal that shifts in fruit types and lignification have occurred much more commonly than generally assumed. The main clades in the subfamily are outlined, which largely contradict previous classifications based on morphology. Ó 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Keywords: Campanulaceae; Lobelioideae (Lobeliaceae); rbcL; ndhF; trnL–F; Fruit evolution; Bayesian inference; SH test; Systematics 1. Introduction As currently circumscribed (Lammers, 1998b), the family is divided into five subfamilies: Campanuloideae The Campanulaceae Jussieu is a well-known group of Burnett, Lobelioideae Burnett, Nemacladoideae Lam- plants comprising 84 genera and nearly 2400 species (Lam- mers, Cyphioideae (A.
    [Show full text]
  • Montane Subtropical Forests of the Sierra Madre Del Sur, and Temperate Forests and Montane Shrubland of the Northern Sierra Madre Oriental
    University of Fotoseries para la Cuantificación de Combustibles Washington Forestales de México: College of Forest Resources Bosques Montanos Subtropicales de la Sierra Madre del Sur y Bosques Templados y Matorral Submontano del Norte de la Sierra Madre Oriental Month 2007 Photo Series for Quantifying Forest Fuels in México: Montane Subtropical Forests of the Sierra Madre del Sur, and Temperate Forests and Montane Shrubland of the Northern Sierra Madre Oriental United States Forest Service Pacific Northwest Jorge E. Morfín-Ríos, Ernesto Alvarado-Celestino, Enrique J. Jardel-Peláez, Research Station Robert E. Vihnanek, David K. Wright, José M. Michel-Fuentes, Clinton S. Wright, Roger D. Ottmar, David V. Sandberg & Andrés Nájera-Díaz. Universidad de Guadalajara United States Agency for International Development Fondo Mexicano para la Conservación de la Naturaleza Fotoseries para la Cuantificación de Combustibles Forestales de University of México: Washington Bosques Montanos Subtropicales de la Sierra Madre del Sur y College of Forest Resources Bosques Templados y Matorral Submontano del Norte de la Sierra Madre Oriental Photo Series for Quantifying Forest Fuels in México: Month 2007 Montane Subtropical Forests of the Sierra Madre del Sur, and Temperate Forests and Montane Shrubland of the Northern Sierra Madre Oriental Jorge E. Morfín-Ríos, Ernesto Alvarado-Celestino, Enrique J. Jardel-Peláez, Robert E. Vihnanek, David K. Wright, José M. Michel-Fuentes, Clinton S. Wright, Roger D. Ottmar, David V. Sandberg & Andrés Nájera-Díaz. United States Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station Universidad de Guadalajara United States Agency for International Development Fondo Mexicano para la Conservación de la Naturaleza RESUMEN ABSTRACT Morfín Ríos, J.E.; Alvarado Celestino, E.; Jardel Peláez, E.J.; Vihnanek, Morfín Ríos, J.E.; Alvarado Celestino, E.; Jardel Peláez, E.J.; Vihnanek, R.E.; Wright, D.K.; Michel Fuentes, J.M.; Wright, C.S.; Ottmar, R.D.; R.E.; Wright, D.K.; Michel Fuentes, J.M.; Wright, C.S.; Ottmar, R.D.; Sandberg, D.V.; Nájera Díaz, A.
    [Show full text]
  • Low Water-Use Plant List
    Low Water-Use Plant List This flyer is a short list of plants. For information on many more low-water use plants, see the flip side. Flowering Shrubs Alyogyne Huegelii Blue hibiscus Callistemon violaceus Purple bottlebrush Ceanothus Wild Lilac Ca Cercis occidentalis Redbud Ca Cistus Rock Rose Cotinus coggygria Smoke tree Echium candicans Pride of Madeira Eriogonum Wild buckwheat Ca Encelia farinosa Escallonia Evergreen shrub Ceanothus thyrsiflorus Brittlebrush Euryops pectinatusEvergreen shrub Wild Lilac Fremontodendrum Flannel bush Ca Grevillea lavandulacea Jade pearl Santolina chamaecyparissus Cotton Shrubs Lantana Lantana lavender Arctostaphylos Manzanita Ca Lavandula Lavender Teucrium chamaedrys Dwarf germander Artemesia californica Wormwood Ca Lupinus albifrons & excubitus Lupine Ca Atriplex Saltbrush Ca Punica granatum Pomegranate Perennials Dodonaea viscosa Hop seed bush Achillea millefolium Island pink yarrow Ca Romneya coulteri Matilija poppy Ca Elaeagnus augustifolia Russian olive Asclepias speciosa Showy milkweed Ca Rhaphiolepsis Indian hawthorne Encelia californica Coast sunflowerCa Bouteloua gracilis Blue Grama (grass) Ca Encelia farinosa Brittlebush Ca Ground covers Carex tumulicola Berkeley Sedge Mahonia pinnata California holly grape Ca Baccharis pilularis Coyote brush Ca Clarkia Clarkia Ca Nandina domestica heavenly bamboo Cerastuim tometosum Snow in summer Coreopsis grandifloraSunray Ribes viburnifolium Evergreen currant Ca Ceratostigma plumbaginoides Dwarf Epilobium canum California fuchsia Ca Rhamnus alaternus Italian
    [Show full text]
  • 2097 the Bellflower Family, Campanulaceae Juss., Is
    American Journal of Botany 101 ( 12 ): 2097 – 2112 , 2014 . P HYLOGENY, CLASSIFICATION, AND FRUIT EVOLUTION OF THE SPECIES-RICH NEOTROPICAL BELLFLOWERS (CAMPANULACEAE: LOBELIOIDEAE) 1 L AURA P . L AGOMARSINO 2,7 , A LEXANDRE A NTONELLI 3 , N ATHAN M UCHHALA 4 , A LLAN T IMMERMANN 5 , S ARAH M ATHEWS 2,6 , AND C HARLES C. DAVIS 2 2 Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University Herbaria, 22 Divinity Avenue, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138 USA; 3 Department of Biological and Environmental Science, University of Gothenburg and Gothenburg Botanical Garden, Carl Skottsbergs Gata 22B, P.O. Box 461, SE 405 30, Göteborg, Sweden; 4 Department of Biology, University of Missouri–St. Louis, R428 Research Building, St. Louis, Missouri 63121 USA; 5 Section for Ecoinformatics and Biodiversity, Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University, Ny Munkegade 114, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark; and 6 National Research Collections Australia, CSIRO National Facilities and Collections, Canberra ACT 2601, Australia • Premise of the study: The species-rich Neotropical genera Centropogon , Burmeistera , and Siphocampylus represent more than half of the ~1200 species in the subfamily Lobelioideae (Campanulaceae). They exhibit remarkable morphological variation in fl oral morphology and habit. Limited taxon sampling and phylogenetic resolution, however, obscures our understanding of relationships between and within these genera and underscores our uncertainty of the systematic value of fruit type as a major diagnostic character. • Methods: We inferred a phylogeny from fi ve plastid DNA regions ( rpl32 - trnL , ndhF - rpl32 , rps16 - trnK , trnG - trnG - trns , rbcL ) using maximum-likelihood and Bayesian inference. Ancestral character reconstructions were applied to infer patterns of fruit evolution.
    [Show full text]