DOCSLIB.ORG

Azoxystrobin (Quadris, Amistar)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Azoxystrobin (Quadris, Amistar) Crop Profile for Beans (Snap) in Tennessee Prepared: April 2003 Revised: January 2013 General Production Information Production Facts: Snap beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) are tender, warm-season, annuals that are grown for their fleshy, immature pods. The harvested fruit generally ripen 48-60 days after planting. Snap beans are grown mainly for fresh market in Tennessee; however a small amount of acreage does exist as processing. • Tennessee ranked around 2nd in snap bean production with the majority being produced for the fresh market in 2011. • Approximately 14,000 acres were planted in 2012 with approximately 13,500 acres harvested. • Producers received approximately $35.00 per cwt. in 2011. • Average yield per acre for Tennessee can be expected around 3,100 lbs per acre. However, National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) reported that from 2009 to 2011, in Tennessee ranged from 24 to 42 cwt. per acre. • Tennessee contributes to just less than 15% of the national snap bean fresh market production during 2012. • Production cost ranges from $440 to 580 per acre depending on seed variety selection, and if seed is treatment, non-treated and/or other production methods (such as irrigation) are selected. • An estimated production value in 2012 was approximately $525 per acre. • During 2010 and 2011, snap beans were valued at $14,508,000 and $9,065,000 respectively for Tennessee’s economy. Production Facts: • The majority of snap beans produced in Tennessee during 2012 were primarily grown in the Cumberland Plateau region. This area is considered middle Tennessee. However, a small amount of acreage has been grown in previous years in West Tennessee; however no acreage was reported for 2012. Cultural Practices Worker Safety and Re-Entry Intervals: Most large scale snap bean producers hire migrant workers or individuals located near their community. Tennessee producers are required by federal and state laws to follow safety standards known as the Worker Protection Standards (WPS). The Worker Protection Standards 1 Funding for this project was provided by the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture, under Agreement No. 2011-51120-31171, "Management of the Southern IPM Center 2011" are regulations which cover pesticide usage in agricultural, forest, nursery and greenhouse production. Any Tennessee producer employing individuals to work in agricultural production must inform and/or train workers concerning the Worker Protection Standards. Worker Protection Standards are standards which are to be followed by employers to help eliminate possible pesticide contamination of pesticide applicators, handlers or workers. Information pertaining to pesticide application must be posted in a central location. Information concerning products used, location of application and re-entry interval is posted at the central location. Also, other items pertaining to safety are provided to workers, applicators and/or handlers. Tables 5, 10 and 12, include re-entry intervals of products commonly used in Tennessee snap bean production. If workers, handlers and/or applicators must enter the field earlier than indicated by the pesticide label, individuals may be required to wear certain personal protective equipment. In most cases this includes boots, gloves, hat, long sleeve shirts, and long legged trousers. The Signal Word indicated by Caution, Warning or Danger are indicators of the level of human hazard which may vary between formulations containing the same active ingredient. The Signal Word lets the applicator, handler or worker know the relative acute toxicity of a product. Early re-entry is generally not necessary in Tennessee snap bean production. Treated areas are also posted to inform workers that treatments have been made and re-entry is restricted. If employers and employees follow WPS regulations, harvest interval and re-entry intervals, agricultural workers are less likely to be at risk to pesticide exposure in Tennessee agricultural production systems. Worker Activities: Land Preparation: Soils are generally freshened prior to planting or during the seeding process. This activity involves one person driving an open or enclosed-cab tractor. Snap bean production is done on bare ground and no workers are required for bed formation. Planting Method: Seed and fertilizer are placed mechanically at planting. This process requires one operator in an open or enclosed-cab tractor. Seedling germination is generally 85-95 percent, however occasionally germination may be lowered when weather conditions and seedling diseases are favored. No thinning operations are necessary. Irrigation: Little or no irrigation occurs in snap bean production in Tennessee. This would increase the cost of production. However, past dry springs have increased interests of some individuals to further investigate potential use in the future. Cultivation: Fields are cultivated mechanically at least once and sometimes two or three times before the crop is harvested. Low clearance tractors may only allow for one cultivation per crop, however snap beans generally do not get tall enough to cause clearance issues. Cultivation only requires one operator in an open or enclosed-cab tractor. Most cultivation is done with an open cab tractor. Scouting: Progressive growers scout at least weekly. Farm managers, farm advisors and their assistants review their findings and often consult with county agents or area specialist concerning crop protection methods. Disease and insect control is most critical prior to and during bloom and pest levels should be monitored closely during this time. Information concerning weed 2 pressure is also taken into account. All Worker Protection Standards are followed during field scouting events. Harvest: The only time agricultural workers come in contact with the snap beans is during harvest. Approximately 95 percent of snap bean acreage is machine harvested. Most bush varieties are machine harvested (90% plus), while 50% of the half runner types are machine harvested and all pole types are hand harvested. Fields that are machine harvested are picked only once. The remaining snap bean acreage is hand harvested. Hand harvested fields may be harvested one to seven times depending on pod production. Generally, most hand harvest fields are picked 4 times. Workers generally dress in long sleeve shirts and pants during harvest. Workers often wear cloth or leather gloves during harvest due to possible skin abrasion. Remaining plant residues are eventually incorporated by tillage equipment into the soil. Growers planting large acreage may plant at staggered dates so that harvest can be spread over several days in the event of poor weather, loss may be lessened. Most importantly, multiple plantings are used to ensure a consistent supply of product over the entire season. During grading, initially machines are used to remove trash and shriveled, discolored pods. After machine grading, pods are inspected by two to four workers that are responsible removing remaining trash or shriveled pods. Workers normally wear cotton gloves during the grading process. After harvesting and grading, beans they are immediately shipped by truck to market or the processor. Varieties Cultivar or variety selection may be one of the more important components to successful snap bean production. Most snap beans grown commercially are of the bush type, however there are a few growers who prefer pole types. At this time pods should be full of fruit and not dried. Bush type beans are generally planted with varying planting dates. Many large scale growers may spread out planting over a 50-60 day period. This allows for continued harvest throughout the season. Also, this may reduce risks of loss caused damage by pests and or the environment. Listed below are several varieties available during 2012. Bush types • Ambra is a prolific yielder that develops straight, smooth, medium dark green 6" pods. Approximately 52 days until it reaches maturity and the upright plant structure makes for an excellent mechanical harvest variety. • Bronco is a dark green-podded, small sieve-size, fresh market cultivar which may be harvested within 53 days. • Caprice matures in 60 Days. It has straight, smooth pods that have slow seed development, a fine eating quality and an attractive medium dark green color. Its upright plants set their 5 1/2 - 6" pods mid high in the plant which lends well to both hand and mechanical harvest. Caprice yields well under virus pressure, has resistance to bacterial brown spot and has good heat tolerance. • Carlo is a round-podded, small-sieve cultivar. This cultivar has white seeds with medium- green pods and is best suited for fresh market and is ready for harvest within 55 days. 3 • Charon is a bush green bean with dark-green, straight, has 6- to 7-inch string-less pods. Resistant to bacterial brown spot, common bean mosaic, curly top virus, halo blight and northern leaf blight (race 8) and matures in 55 days. • Crockett matures in 60 days, are a very dark green filet type is a high yielding green bush bean that produces a high percentage of refined 2 sieve pods that are perfect for use as a filet type bean. Its round, slim pods hold well at maturity and measure 6" in length. It has a continuous set, which allows for hand harvest over an extended period of time. Tolerance to BCMV (BV-1 and NY 15), Bean Rust, Halo Blight (race 2) and Curly Top Virus. • Dusky matures in 52 days which has a 6-inch, round, smooth, dark-green pods with white seeds. Resistant to bacterial brown spot, bean mosaic virus (race 15), common bean mosaic, halo blight and northern leaf blight (race 8). • Festina matures in 56 days, has a dark green pods. Commonly used for canning or fresh eating, this upright plant, tender-sweet pods, perfect for hot, sultry climates. Resistant to CBM Virus, sets nice straight pods about 6 inches long. • Hickok matures in 54 Days. Hickok green bean produces medium-dark green, 3-4 sieve pods on upright plants and has resistance to BCMV (US 1), Rust and Beet Curly Top Virus.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • US 2014/0116112 A1 HUMPHREY Et Al
    US 201401 16112A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2014/0116112 A1 HUMPHREY et al. (43) Pub. Date: May 1, 2014 (54) METHODS FOR DETERMINING THE Publication Classification PRESENCE OR ABSENCE OF CONTAMINANTS IN A SAMPLE (51) Int. Cl. GOIN30/72 (2006.01) (71) Applicant: K & D LABORATORIES, INC., Lake (52) U.S. Cl. Oswego, OR (US) CPC .................................. G0IN30/7206 (2013.01) USPC ......................................................... T3/23.37 (72) Inventors: David Kent HUMPHREY, Reno, NV (US); Nicholas Joseph GEISE, Portland, OR (US) (57) ABSTRACT (73) Assignee: K & D LABORATORIES, INC., Lake Oswego, OR (US) Methods are provided for rapidly determining the presence or absence of large numbers of contaminants in a test sample, (21) Appl. No.: 13/830,388 Such as a raw material intended for use in the preparation of a nutraceutical. The disclosed methods employ gas chromatog (22) Filed: Mar 14, 2013 raphy-mass spectrometry techniques together with the spe cific use of software in combination with a database to ana Related U.S. Application Data lyze data collected after ionization of the sample and (60) Provisional application No. 61/718,607, filed on Oct. determine the presence or absence of the contaminants in the 25, 2012. sample. US 2014/01161 12 A1 May 1, 2014 METHODS FOR DETERMINING THE 0007. In one embodiment, methods for detecting the pres PRESENCE OR ABSENCE OF ence or absence of a plurality of contaminants in a sample are CONTAMINANTS IN A SAMPLE provided, such methods comprising: (a) extracting the sample with a water-miscible solvent in the presence of a high con REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS centration of salts to provide a sample extract; (b) shaking and centrifuging the sample extract to provide a Supernatant; (c) 0001.
    [Show full text]
  • Multi-Omics Phenotyping of the Gut-Liver Axis Reveals Metabolic Perturbations from a Low-Dose Pesticide Mixture in Rats
    ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-021-01990-w OPEN Multi-omics phenotyping of the gut-liver axis reveals metabolic perturbations from a low-dose pesticide mixture in rats Robin Mesnage 1, Maxime Teixeira 2, Daniele Mandrioli 3, Laura Falcioni 3, Mariam Ibragim1, Quinten Raymond Ducarmon4, Romy Daniëlle Zwittink 4, Caroline Amiel2, Jean-Michel Panoff2, ✉ Emma Bourne5, Emanuel Savage5, Charles A. Mein5, Fiorella Belpoggi3 & Michael N. Antoniou 1 Health effects of pesticides are not always accurately detected using the current battery of regulatory toxicity tests. We compared standard histopathology and serum biochemistry 1234567890():,; measures and multi-omics analyses in a subchronic toxicity test of a mixture of six pesticides frequently detected in foodstuffs (azoxystrobin, boscalid, chlorpyrifos, glyphosate, imida- cloprid and thiabendazole) in Sprague-Dawley rats. Analysis of water and feed consumption, body weight, histopathology and serum biochemistry showed little effect. Contrastingly, serum and caecum metabolomics revealed that nicotinamide and tryptophan metabolism were affected, which suggested activation of an oxidative stress response. This was not reflected by gut microbial community composition changes evaluated by shotgun metage- nomics. Transcriptomics of the liver showed that 257 genes had their expression changed. Gene functions affected included the regulation of response to steroid hormones and the activation of stress response pathways. Genome-wide DNA methylation analysis of the same liver samples showed that 4,255 CpG sites were differentially methylated. Overall, we demonstrated that in-depth molecular profiling in laboratory animals exposed to low con- centrations of pesticides allows the detection of metabolic perturbations that would remain undetected by standard regulatory biochemical measures and which could thus improve the predictability of health risks from exposure to chemical pollutants.
    [Show full text]
  • Pest Management Strategic Plan for Western U.S. Sugarbeet Production
    Pest Management Strategic Plan for Western U.S. Sugarbeet Production Summary of a workshop held on December 15–16, 2004 Boise, ID Issued 08/05/05 Lead Authors: Ronda Hirnyck, Lisa Downey Editor: Sally O’Neal Coates Contact Person: Ronda Hirnyck, Idaho Pesticide Program Coordinator (208) 364-4046 [email protected] This project was sponsored by the Western Integrated Pest Management Center, which is funded by the United States Department of Agriculture, Cooperative State Research, Education and Extension Service. Table of Contents Work Group................................................................................................3 Summary of Critical Needs .......................................................................5 Introduction ................................................................................................7 Production Overview ..................................................................................9 Foundation for the Pest Management Strategic Plan Crop Rotation ...................................................................................13 Pre-plant ...........................................................................................14 Planting.............................................................................................24 Pre-emergence ..................................................................................39 Emergence to Row Closure...............................................................44 Row Closure to Harvest....................................................................71
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. EPA, Pesticide Product Label, QUADRIS XTRA FUNGICIDE, 05/06/2008
    UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 OFFICE OF PREVENTION, PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES Ms. Adora Clark MAY 6 2008 Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc. ~ P.O. Box 18300 Greensboro, NC 27419 Dear Ms Clark: Subject: Quadris Xtra Fungicide EPA Reg. No. 100-1225 Your Revised Label of February 8, 2008 The amendment referred to above, submitted in connection with registration under FIFRA sec. 3(c)(7)(A), is conditionally accepted provided that the following revision is made to the label: Update the Warranty Statement tocohform to that for Tilt, EPA Reg. No. 100-617, accepted May 25,2007. Submit one copy of the final printed label before you release the product for shipment. If these conditions are not complied with, the registration will be subject to cancellation in accordance with FIFRA sec. 6(e). Your release for shipment of the product constitutes acceptance of these conditions. A stamped copy of the label is enclosed for your records. Sincerely yours, C o-J5'~~~1t'- Mary L Waller Product Manager 21 Fungicide Branch Registration Division (750 Enclosures 7505P:CGrable:cg:5/1/08 ~, ' "'," ,t U-r'.,' Page 18 'CONTAINER/BASE LABEL I GROUP _ FUNGICIDES I Quadris Xtra ™ Fungicide Broad spectrum fungicide for control of plant diseases Active Ingredients: "Azoxy~trobin(CAS No. 131-860-33:'8} ....................... , .............................. 18.2% 'Cypr6c6naiole (cAs No. 94361-'06;;,5).. ............. , .. : .................................... 7.3% Other Ingredients: 74.5% Total: 100.0% Quadris Xtra is a 280SC formulation that contains 0.67 lb. a.i. cyproconazole and 1.67 lb. a.i. azoxystrobin per gallon. ~.!.:~(:~~r.T~D .
    [Show full text]
  • US EPA, Pesticide Product Label, Azoxystrobin 2SC,08/06/2020
    U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY EPA Reg. Number: Date of Issuance: Office of Pesticide Programs Registration Division (7505P) 94730-6 8/6/20 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. Washington, D.C. 20460 NOTICE OF PESTICIDE: Term of Issuance: X Registration Reregistration Unconditional (under FIFRA, as amended) Name of Pesticide Product: Azoxystrobin 2SC Name and Address of Registrant (include ZIP Code): Generic Crop Science, LLC c/o Biologic Regulatory Consulting, Inc. 10529 Heritage Bay Blvd. Naples, FL 34120 Note: Changes in labeling differing in substance from that accepted in connection with this registration must be submitted to and accepted by the Registration Division prior to use of the label in commerce. In any correspondence on this product always refer to the above EPA registration number. On the basis of information furnished by the registrant, the above named pesticide is hereby registered under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act. Registration is in no way to be construed as an endorsement or recommendation of this product by the Agency. In order to protect health and the environment, the Administrator, on his motion, may at any time suspend or cancel the registration of a pesticide in accordance with the Act. The acceptance of any name in connection with the registration of a product under this Act is not to be construed as giving the registrant a right to exclusive use of the name or to its use if it has been covered by others. This product is unconditionally registered in accordance with FIFRA section 3(c)(5) provided that you: 1. Submit and/or cite all data required for registration/reregistration/registration review of your product when the Agency requires all registrants of similar products to submit such data.
    [Show full text]
  • Strobilurins: Evolution of a New Class of Active Substances
    Strobilurins––new fungicides for crop protection Kresoxim-methyl REVIEWS Strobilurins: Evolution of a New Class of Active Substances Hubert Sauter,* Wolfgang Steglich, and Timm Anke Dedicated to Professor Hans-Jürgen Quadbeck-Seeger on the occasion of his 60th birthday Nature provides active substances, as mansins, the identification of the b- ture ± activity relationships. The varia- the result of special biosynthetic path- methoxyacrylate group as their com- tion of natural product lead structures ways, with the most diverse biological mon structural element, and the eluci- and the selection of suitable candidates activities. Many of these substances dation of their mode of actionÐsaw for development led to an across-the- perform functions that are important the focus of research activities shift board evolution of the strobilurins as a to the survival of the organism in which away from the universities, ushering in new class of active substance. Several they are formed. For example, certain an era of intense competition between commercial products resulting from fungi produce antifungal strobilurins rival industrial fungicide research this effort are now already on the and oudemansins, agents to which the teams. Their goal was, and remains, market, and more are expected to producers themselves are not sensitive, the development of fungicides with follow: a most intriguing success story. but which ward off other fungal species practical applications in agricultural that grow on the same substrates. The crop protection. This review illustrates Keywords: active substance research period that followed the early break- methodological approaches in the op- ´ fungicides ´ natural products ´ throughs in the 1970sÐthe discovery timization of lead structures and the strobilurins ´ structure ± activity re- of the natural strobilurins and oude- importance of understanding struc- lationships 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Interactive Effect of Nitrogen and Azoxystrobin on Yield, Quality, Nitrogen and Water Use Efficiency of Wild Rocket in Southern
    agronomy Article Interactive Effect of Nitrogen and Azoxystrobin on Yield, Quality, Nitrogen and Water Use Efficiency of Wild Rocket in Southern Italy Vincenzo Candido 1,*, Francesca Boari 2, Vito Cantore 2 , Donato Castronuovo 1 , Donato Di Venere 2, Michele Perniola 3, Lucrezia Sergio 2, Roberto Viggiani 1 and Maria Immacolata Schiattone 1,* 1 School of Agriculture, Forest, Food and Environmental Sciences, University of Basilicata, Viale dell’Ateneo Lucano, 10, 85100 Potenza, Italy; [email protected] (D.C.); [email protected] (R.V.) 2 Institute of Sciences of Food Production, National Research Council (CNR-ISPA), Via Amendola, 122/O, 70125 Bari, Italy; [email protected] (F.B.); [email protected] (V.C.); [email protected] (D.D.V.); [email protected] (L.S.) 3 Department of European and Mediterranean Cultures, University of Basilicata, Via Lanera, 10, 75100 Matera, Italy; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] (V.C.); [email protected] (M.I.S.) Received: 14 May 2020; Accepted: 12 June 2020; Published: 14 June 2020 Abstract: Wild rocket (Diplotaxis tenuifolia L. DC) is an emerging vegetable which market requires high-quality standards that can be obtained through appropriate cultivation techniques such as the right level of nitrogen and the application of biostimulant substances. These include strobilurins, marketed mainly as fungicides that can have complementary positive effects on the yield, quality and resources’ use efficiency of many crops. For this reason, a trial in an unheated greenhouse, in Southern Italy, to evaluate the possibility of using Azoxystrobin to improve the production of wild 1 rocket subjected to different nitrogen inputs, was carried out.
    [Show full text]
  • A Critical Review of Synthetic Chemicals in Surface Waters of the US, the EU and China
    Environment International 131 (2019) 104994 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Environment International journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/envint Review article A critical review of synthetic chemicals in surface waters of the US, the EU T and China ⁎ Wendi Fanga, Ying Penga, Derek Muirb,c, Jun Lind, Xiaowei Zhanga, a State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control & Resource Reuse, School of the Environment, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, PR China b Environment and Climate Change Canada, Canada Centre for Inland Waters, 867 Lakeshore Road, Burlington, ON L7S 1A1, Canada c School of Environment, Jinan University, Guangzhou, PR China d Solid Waste and Chemicals Management Center, Ministry of Ecology and Environment, PR China ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Handling editor: Adrian Covaci There is a wide concern that emerging organic pollutants (EOPs) in surface water could adversely affect human Keywords: health and wildlife. However, the geographic distribution, exposure pattern and ecological risk of emerging Chemical pollution organic pollutants are poorly understood at a global scale. This paper provides a comprehensive survey on the Risk assessment exposure level of EOPs in China, the US and the EU based on the published literature. The hazard level of three Pesticide categories of EOPs, namely pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs), pesticides and industrial Industry chemicals was further evaluated by adopting a novel Aquatic HazPi index that jointly accounts for the persis- Pharmaceutical and personal care products tence, bioaccumulation, toxicity and bioactivity. Furthermore, a correlation analysis of land use with the surface Land use water exposure status regarding the synthetic chemicals was conducted. According to the published data re- ported between 2010 and 2016, the concentration of pesticides in the US was higher than in the EU and China.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Compound-Derived Cytochrome Bc1 Complex Inhibitors As Antifungal Agents
    molecules Review Natural Compound-Derived Cytochrome bc1 Complex Inhibitors as Antifungal Agents Loana Musso * , Andrea Fabbrini and Sabrina Dallavalle Department of Food, Environmental and Nutritional Sciences (DeFENS), Division of Chemical and Biomolecular Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Celoria 2, 20133 Milan, Italy; [email protected] (A.F.); [email protected] (S.D.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 4 August 2020; Accepted: 6 October 2020; Published: 7 October 2020 Abstract: The high incidence of fungal pathogens has become a global issue for crop protection. A promising strategy to control fungal plant infections is based on the use of nature-inspired compounds. The cytochrome bc1 complex is an essential component of the cellular respiratory chain and is one of the most important fungicidal targets. Natural products have played a crucial role in the discovery of cytochrome bc1 inhibitors, as proven by the development of strobilurins, one of the most important classes of crop-protection agents, over the past two decades. In this review, we summarize advances in the exploration of natural product scaffolds for the design and development of new bc1 complex inhibitors. Particular emphasis is given to molecular modeling-based approaches and structure–activity relationship (SAR) studies performed to improve the stability and increase the potency of natural precursors. The collected results highlight the versatility of natural compounds and provide an insight into the potential development of nature-inspired derivatives as antifungal agents. Keywords: natural compounds; cytochrome bc1 complex; antifungals; (E)-β-methoxyacrylate; strobilurins 1. Introduction Plant diseases caused by fungal pathogens are a major threat to the agricultural industry worldwide.
    [Show full text]
  • Recognition and Management of Pesticide Poisonings: Fungicides
    CHAPTER 16 HIGHLIGHTS Numerous fungicides in use with varying levels of toxicity Fungicides Most are unlikely to cause systemic poisonings, exceptions being Fungicides are extensively used in industry, agriculture and the home and garden for: • Organomercury 1. protection of seed grain during storage, shipment and germination; compounds • Triazoles 2. protection of mature crops, berries, seedlings, flowers and grasses in the field, in storage and during shipment; • Some copper compounds 3. suppression of mildews that attack painted surfaces; • Isolated EBDC 4. control of slime in paper pulps; and exceptions 5. protection of carpet and fabrics in the home. Approximately 500 million pounds of fungicides are applied worldwide annu- ally (see Chapter 1, Introduction). Fungicides vary enormously in their potential for causing adverse effects in humans. Historically, some of the most tragic epidemics of pesticide poisoning occurred by mistaken consumption of seed grain treated with organic mercury or hexachlorobenzene. However, most fungicides currently in use and registered for use in the United States are unlikely to cause frequent or severe acute systemic poison- ings for several reasons: (1) many have low inherent toxicity in mammals and are inefficiently absorbed; (2) many are formulated as suspensions of wettable powders or granules, from which rapid, efficient absorption is unlikely; and (3) methods of application are such that relatively few individuals are intensively exposed. Apart from systemic poisonings, fungicides as a class also cause irritant injuries to skin and mucous membranes, as well as some dermal sensitization. The following discussion considers the recognized adverse effects of widely used fungicides. In the case of those agents that have caused systemic poisoning, some recommendations for management of poisonings and injuries are provided.
    [Show full text]
  • US EPA, Pesticide Product Label, MAXIM QUATTRO,01/13/2020
    UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY A \ WASHINGTON, DC 20460 OFFICE OF CHEMICAL SAFETY AND POLLUTION PREVENTION January 13, 2020 Ricky Kyaw Regulatory Product Manager Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC P.O. Box 18300 Greensboro, NC 27419 Subject; Registration Review Label Mitigation for Azoxystrobin, Fludioxonil and Mefenoxam Product Name; Maxim Quattro EPA Registration Number; 100-1352 Application Dates; 2/1/2019 Decision Numbers; 555106; 555107; 555108 Dear Mr. Kyaw; The Agency, in accordance with the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), as amended, has completed reviewing all of the information submitted with your application to support the Registration Review of the above referenced product in connection with Azoxystrobin, Fludioxonil and Mefenoxam Interim Decisions, and has concluded that your submission is acceptable. The label referred to above, submitted in connection with registration under FIFRA, as amended, is acceptable. Should you wish to add/retain a reference to the company’s website on your label, then please be aware that the website becomes labeling under the Federal Insecticide Fungicide and Rodenticide Act and is subject to review by the Agency. If the website is false or misleading, the product would be misbranded and unlawful to sell or distribute under FIFRA section 12(a)(1)(E). 40 CFR 156.10(a)(5) list examples of statements EPA may consider false or misleading. In addition, regardless of whether a website is referenced on your product’s label, claims made on the website may not substantially differ from those claims approved through the registration process. Therefore, should the Agency find or if it is brought to our attention that a website contains false or misleading statements or claims substantially differing from the EPA approved registration, the website will be referred to the EPA’s Office of Enforcement and Compliance.
    [Show full text]
  • STROBE® PRO BROAD SPECTRUM FUNGICIDE for Control of Turf Diseases
    GROUP 3 11 FUNGICIDE STROBE® PRO BROAD SPECTRUM FUNGICIDE For control of Turf Diseases. ACTIVE INGREDIENTS: % BY WT. Azoxystrobin* ...............................6.0% Propiconazole** ........................... 10.0% OTHER INGREDIEN TS:.................84.0% TOTAL: .................................... 100.0% KEEP OUT OF REACH OF CHILDREN A liquid soluble concentrate that contains 0.87 lbs. propiconazole and 0.52 lbs. azoxystrobin per gallon. CAUTION *IUPAC: methyl (E)-2-{2-[6-(2-cyanophenoxy) EPA Reg. No: 53883-418 pyrimidin-4-yloxy]phenyl}-3-methoxyacrylate EPA Est No. 53883-TX-002 **CAS Number 60207-90-1 CONTENTS: 1 GALLON Manufactured for: EPA 111417 KEEP OUT OF REACH OF CHILDREN CAUTION FIRST AID IF SWALLOWED: • Call a poison control center or doctor immediately for treatment advice. • Have person sip a glass of water if able to swallow. • Do not induce vomiting unless told to by the poison control center or doctor. • Do not give anything by mouth to an unconscious person. IF INHALED: • Move person to fresh air. • If person is not breathing, call 911 or an ambulance; then give artificial respiration, preferably by mouth-to-mouth if possible. • Call a poison control center or doctor for further treatment advice. IF IN EYES: • Hold eye open and rinse slowly and gently with water for 15-20 minutes. • Remove contact lenses, if present, after the first 5 minutes; then continue rinsing. • Call a poison control center or doctor for treatment advice.: IF ON SKIN: • Take off contaminated clothing. • Rinse skin immediately with plenty of water for 15-20 minutes. • Call a poison control center or doctor for treatment advice. Have the product container or label with you when calling a poison control center or doctor, or going for treatment.
    [Show full text]