DOCSLIB.ORG

President Kennedy and the Escalation of the Vietnam War Kenneth L

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
President Kennedy and the Escalation of the Vietnam War Kenneth L Cedarville University DigitalCommons@Cedarville History Capstone Research Papers Senior Capstone Papers 4-28-2015 President Kennedy and the Escalation of the Vietnam War Kenneth L. Sterner Cedarville University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.cedarville.edu/history_capstones Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Sterner, Kenneth L., "President Kennedy and the Escalation of the Vietnam War" (2015). History Capstone Research Papers. 1. http://digitalcommons.cedarville.edu/history_capstones/1 This Capstone Project is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@Cedarville, a service of the Centennial Library. It has been accepted for inclusion in History Capstone Research Papers by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Cedarville. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Sterner, Page 1 Kennedy Responsible: Vietnam By: Kenneth Sterner Senior Thesis 4/23/2015 Sterner, Page 2 Table of Contents 1) Introduction A) Literature Review B) Thesis 2) Historical Context A) President Truman’s Role B) President Eisenhower’s Role C) President Kennedy’s Role D) President Johnson’s Role E) The Impact of President Eisenhower 3) Main Argument A) Kennedy’s Removal of President Diem B) Diem and the Political Stability of South Vietnam. 1954-1963 C) The Political Instability of South Vietnam after Diem. 1963-1965 D) Kennedy, Diem, and the Success of the Vietnam War. 1960-1963 E) The War in South Vietnam after Diem. 1963-1965. F) President Diem and the Economics of South Vietnam. 1954-1968. 4) Hesitation, or Personality? 5) Conclusion Sterner, Page 3 Map of Vietnam Sterner, Page 4 Map of North and South Vietnam Sterner, Page 5 Ngo Dinh Diem Sterner, Page 6 Section 1: Introduction In nearly 250 years of existence, the United States has rarely faced an opponent that was able to match, let alone defeat, its superior military capabilities. The conflict in Vietnam is one of the rare instances in time where a significantly weaker faction was able to resist the strength of America’s political, military, and economic superiority. When American disdain for the war reached its peak in the late 1960’s, many people blamed President Lyndon B. Johnson’s ‘Great Escalation’ for involving the U.S in a protracted, unwinnable war. As several government documents became declassified in the 1990’s many historians became convinced that President Eisenhower’s “Hidden Hand” presidency placed America on the path toward involvement in Vietnam. David L. Anderson, author of Trapped by Success, The Eisenhower Administration and Vietnam, represents those historians showing President Eisenhower’s path to Vietnam. Anderson does this by arguing Eisenhower supported a flailing South Vietnamese government with economic and military programs. Economic programs, such as the Commercial Import Program, supported a South Vietnamese economy that otherwise would have collapsed. 1 The Military Assistance Group (MAAG) and Temporary Equipment Recovery Mission (TERM) supported a South Vietnamese army that was weak and ineffective. Finally, David Anderson argues that President Eisenhower’s decision to create and sign the South East Asia Treaty Organization, SEATO, would force future presidents into the Vietnam conflict and act as a basis for U.S escalation. 2 While many historians place the burden of guilt on President Eisenhower or Johnson, some claim that President John F. Kennedy should be held responsible. William J. Rust, author 1 David Anderson, Trapped by Success: The Eisenhower Administration and Vietnam 1953-1961, (New York: Columbia University Press, 1991), 49-50 2 Anderson, 117 Sterner, Page 7 of Kennedy in Vietnam, American Foreign Policy from 1960-1963, argues that President Kennedy’s policies drew America into the Vietnam War. William Rust argues that the Counter Insurgency and Strategic Hamlet plan were programs that attempted to take power and decision making out of the hands of the South Vietnamese government, ultimately creating a government that was reliant on United States support. 3 Rust also argues that President Kennedy’s introduction of four hundred Green Berets, authorization of several joint U.S-Vietnamese missions, growth of the South Vietnamese army, and escalation of military advisers to over sixteen thousand placed America in a position where it could not withdraw from Vietnam, ultimately forcing Johnson into the conflict. 4 Finally, some historians continue to claim that President Lyndon Johnson remains the primary reason America entered the Vietnam conflict. Michael H. Hunt, author of Lyndon Johnson’s War, America’s Cold War Crusade in Vietnam, 1945-1968 , argues that even though Presidents Eisenhower and Kennedy’s use of aid to South Vietnam placed Johnson in a difficult position, Johnson made three steps of his own to escalate the war. First, Johnson used tough rhetoric and more American aid to try and halt North Vietnam from escalating the war. Hunt quotes several of President Johnson’s speeches and escalation of advisers in 1964 as a ‘soft’ escalation. 5 With this type of escalation not working, President Johnson moved onto bombing campaigns in order to win the conflict. Michael Hunt argues that Operation “Rolling Thunder,” an extensive bombing campaign authorized on March 8 th , was designed to bomb North Vietnam into submission. 6 With Operation Rolling Thunder dealing substantial damage, but not ending 3 William Rust, Kennedy in Vietnam: American Foreign Policy from 1960 to 1963, (New York: Da Capo Press, 1985), page 50-51 4 Rust, 181 5 Michael Hunt, Lyndon Johnson’s War: America’s Cold War Crusade in Vietnam, 1945-1968, (New York: Hill and Wang, 1996), 80-85 6 Hunt, 92 Sterner, Page 8 the conflict, Johnson made the last decision available to him. After failing to end the war through threats and bombing, Johnson committed American troops into South Vietnam in what fully committed the U.S to the Vietnam Conflict. 7 While the previous historians make valid points in their examination of responsibility for the Vietnam War, no single author is correct. Author David Anderson rightly places a large portion of blame on President Eisenhower for starting the war, but does not acknowledge the impact of President Kennedy. Rust’s arguments correctly place a large portion of blame on President Kennedy, but are unconvincing when viewing the antagonism between the U.S and South Vietnam. Hunt does a fair job explaining that Presidents Eisenhower and Kennedy laid a foundation for President Johnson, but writes as if President Johnson had a choose to escalate the war. This paper will show that President Kennedy’s decision to remove Ngo Dinh Diem as President of South Vietnam placed him as the decisive President that forced the U.S into the Vietnam conflict. Section 2: Historical Context In order to properly examine President Kennedy’s intervention in the Vietnam conflict, it is important to establish historical context for America’s involvement. U.S intervention in Vietnam can be traced back to President Harry Truman’s support for the French during the early 1950’s. Although Vietnam did not exist as a sovereign state during this time, since France regarded the entire Indochina region as a single colony, the people in Vietnam fervently believed they were a unique nationality. The U.S.S.R, wanting to create a bastion of Communism in Asia, supported revolutionary groups seeking to free themselves from French Colonialism, such as the 7 Hunt, 98 Sterner, Page 9 Viet Minh. With the U.S and U.S.S.R struggling for dominance in the early years of the cold war, the U.S supported its ally France in the region. Truman believed the French forces in the region were acting as a substitute for American troops; his commitment of more than twenty three and a half million dollars to the French war effort withheld the need for American troops in the region. As 1950’s progressed, and despite Truman’s economic aid, the French had spent more than one trillion Francs and been unable to win the war. 8 After years of fighting to maintain its colonial empire, France surrendered its right to govern Southeast Asia when it signed the Geneva Agreements on July 20 th , 1954. These agreements created several nations in the Indochina region, ranging from Laos, to Cambodia, to North and South Vietnam. The Viet-Minh, who were unhappy with the creation of a North and South Vietnam, agreed to the accords because France assured unifying elections in 1956 if the Viet Minh halted hostilities against South Vietnam. 9 President Eisenhower refused to acknowledge the Geneva Agreements because of continued Viet Minh attacks against South Vietnam, as well as the absence of a plan to implement U.N oversight of the unifying elections. Because the Viet Minh attacks originated from North Vietnam, and South Vietnam being attacked for being democratic, President Eisenhower started to supply South Vietnam with a small amount of economic and military aid. 10 As justification for the aid, President Eisenhower introduced the Domino theory. The Domino Theory, first mentioned on April 7 th , 1954, argued that if one country in Southeast Asia fell to 8 “The Tangled Web: America, France and Indochina 1947-50,” HistoryToday, last modified January 1, 2012, accessed April 2, 2015, http://www.historytoday.com/sami-abouzahr/tangled-web-america-france-and-indochina- 1947-50 9 “Indochina - Agreement on the Cessation of Hostilities in Viet-Nam, July 20, 1954,” Lillian Goldman Law Library , last modified January 1 , 2008, accessed January 18 th , 2015, http://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/inch001.asp#1 10 “Vietnam War, Part I – The Geneva Accords,” History Half , last modified October 3, 2010, accessed January 24, 2015, http://historyhalf.com/vietnam-war-part-i-the-geneva-accords/ Sterner, Page 10 Communism, all nearby countries would as well. In 1955 Ngo Dinh Diem, a staunch critic of Communism, gained power in South Vietnam and promised to combat the Viet Minh, who were continuing their terror attacks on South Vietnam in order to scare the population into accepting Communism.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Current Issue of Saber
    1st Cavalry Division Association Non-Profit Organization 302 N. Main St. US. Postage PAID Copperas Cove, Texas 76522-1703 West, TX 76691 Change Service Requested Permit No. 39 SABER Published By and For the Veterans of the Famous 1st Cavalry Division VOLUME 70 NUMBER 4 Website: www.1CDA.org JULY / AUGUST 2021 It is summer and HORSE DETACHMENT by CPT Siddiq Hasan, Commander THE PRESIDENT’S CORNER vacation time for many of us. Cathy and are in The Horse Cavalry Detachment rode the “charge with sabers high” for this Allen Norris summer’s Change of Command and retirement ceremonies! Thankfully, this (704) 641-6203 the final planning stage [email protected] for our trip to Maine. year’s extended spring showers brought the Horse Detachment tall green pastures We were going to go for the horses to graze when not training. last year; however, the Maine authorities required either a negative test for Covid Things at the Horse Detachment are getting back into a regular swing of things or 14 days quarantine upon arrival. Tests were not readily available last summer as communities around the state begin to open and request the HCD to support and being stuck in a hotel 14 days for a 10-day vacation seemed excessive, so we various events. In June we supported the Buckholts Cotton Festival, the Buffalo cancelled. Thankfully we were able to get our deposits back. Soldier Marker Dedication, and 1CD Army Birthday Cake Cutting to name a few. Not only was our vacation cancelled but so were our Reunion and Veterans Day The Horse Detachment bid a fond farewell and good luck to 1SG Murillo and ceremonies.
    [Show full text]
  • The Diem Coup After 50 Years – John F
    The Diem Coup After 50 Years – John F. Kennedy and South Vietnam, 1963 By John Prados Region: Asia Global Research, November 04, 2013 Theme: History The National Security Archive 1 November 2013 Washington, D.C. – Continued investigation of the presidency of John F. Kennedy further strengthens the view that the origins of U.S. support for the coup which overthrew South Vietnamese president Ngo Dinh Diem 50 years ago today traces directly to President Kennedy, not to a “cabal” of top officials in his administration. As thedocuments posted by the National Security Archive in 2009 and new material posted today indicates, the often- told story that a “cabal” of senior officials, in combination with U.S. ambassador to Saigon Henry Cabot Lodge, were responsible for the coup is a myth. The 2009 posting (below) used the then-newly released audiotapes of President Kennedy’s discussions on South Vietnam in late August 1963, combined with the declassified documents on the same meetings, and the State Department cables to Saigon bearing instructions for Ambassador Lodge, to show that Washington officials acted in unison in determining the U.S. approach. Additional evidence presented here supports this conclusion. The additional evidence combined with the 2009 evidence demonstrates: Senior officials who, in a widely-held standard view, were supposed to have come together to excoriate the “cabal” for making an “end-run” around the bureaucracy in securing approval for the coup policy, did not act any differently after revelation of the maneuver than before. If anything, the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), by the traditional account the most steadfast opponent of a coup, cooperated more closely with State Department members of the cabal after the NSC meeting where the coup policy had supposedly been denounced (Document 17).
    [Show full text]
  • The President's Desk: a Resource Guide for Teachers, Grades 4
    The President’s Desk A Resource Guide for Teachers: Grades 4-12 Department of Education and Public Programs With generous support from: Edward J. Hoff and Kathleen O’Connell, Shari E. Redstone John F. Kennedy Presidential Library and Museum Table of Contents Overview of The President’s Desk Interactive Exhibit.... 2 Lesson Plans and Activities................................................................ 40 History of the HMS Resolute Desk............................................... 4 List of Lessons and Activities available on the Library’s Website... 41 The Road to the White House...................................................................... 44 .......................... 8 The President’s Desk Website Organization The President at Work.................................................................................... 53 The President’s Desk The President’s Desk Primary Sources.................................... 10 Sail the Victura Activity Sheet....................................................................... 58 A Resource Guide for Teachers: Grades 4-12 Telephone.................................................................................................... 11 Integrating Ole Miss....................................................................................... 60 White House Diary.................................................................................. 12 The 1960 Campaign: John F. Kennedy, Martin Luther King, Jr., and the Scrimshaw..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 2) FOIA Appeals Log for Calendar Year 2017 3) Mandatory Declassification Review (MDR) Log for Calendar Year 2017
    This document is made available through the declassification efforts and research of John Greenewald, Jr., creator of: The Black Vault The Black Vault is the largest online Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) document clearinghouse in the world. The research efforts here are responsible for the declassification of hundreds of thousands of pages released by the U.S. Government & Military. Discover the Truth at: http://www.theblackvault.com Central Imeltigence Agency Washington, D.C. 20505 16 January 2019 Mr. John Greenewald, Jr. 27305 West Live Oak Road Suite #1203 Castaic, CA 91384 Reference: F-20 18-00766 Dear Mr. Greenewald: This is a final response to your 28 January 2018 Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request for copies of the following: 1) FOIA Case Log for calendar year 2017 2) FOIA Appeals Log for calendar year 2017 3) Mandatory Declassification Review (MDR) Log for calendar year 2017 Enclosed are copies of the FOIA and the MDR case logs, consisting of 97 pages, for the calendar year 2017. Please note the case logs are unavailable in electronic format. The information includes the date the case was created, the case number, and the subject of the request, which includes cases in Item 2. Because you are entitled to the first 100 pages free, there is no charge for processing this request. With respect to Item 2, the Agency does not maintain or create appeals log containing only FOIA appeals, which would require us to create a new record in response to a FOIA request. If you have questions regarding our response, you may seek assistance from CIA's FOIA Public Liaison.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pentagon Papers: Secrets of the Vietnam War Adriana Kelly Junior
    The Pentagon Papers: Secrets of The Vietnam War Adriana Kelly Junior Division Paper 1,890 Words 1 The Pentagon Papers are a series of classified government documents leaked by Daniel Ellsberg in 1971. These papers revealed the lies that both the public and Congress were told about the involvement of the United States in the Vietnam War, and were essential to the withdrawal from the war. Daniel Ellsberg inspired many other whistleblowers to come forward and break the barriers between the public and the government. The involvement of the United States in Vietnam reaches all the way back to 1946. Vietnam was previously a French colony, but during WWII Japan overthrew the French and gave Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia freedom. When WWII ended in 1945, Japan was removed from the area and Vietnam needed new leadership. Ho Chi Minh, a Vietnamese nationalist with Marxist ideas 1, led a group called the Viet Minh to fight for Vietnamese independence against the French, who were trying to reclaim Vietnam. The United States had to pick a side in this war, which is usually referred to as the First Indochina War. On one hand, the United States wanted to support independence and free Vietnam from French rule. But on the other hand, if Vietnam was independent it would be communist which could trigger something called the domino theory. The domino theory states that if one political event in a country, surrounding countries will follow with similar events. Politicians in America were afraid if Vietnam became communist, surrounding countries like Laos, Cambodia, and Thailand would follow.
    [Show full text]
  • Comedy Therapy
    VFW’S HURRICANE DISASTER RELIEF TET 50 YEARS LATER OFFENSIVE An artist emerges from the trenches of WWI COMEDYAS THERAPY Leading the way in supporting those who lead the way. USAA is proud to join forces with the Veterans of Foreign Wars in helping support veterans and their families. USAA means United Services Automobile Association and its affiliates. The VFW receives financial support for this sponsorship. © 2017 USAA. 237701-0317 VFW’S HURRICANE DISASTER RELIEF TET 50 YEARS LATER OFFENSIVE An artist emerges from the trenches of WWI COMEDYAS THERAPY JANUARY 2018 Vol. 105 No. 4 COVER PHOTO: An M-60 machine gunner with 2nd Bn., 5th Marines, readies himself for another assault during the COMEDY HEALS Battle of Hue during the Tet Offensive in 20 A VFW member in New York started a nonprofit that offers veterans February 1968. Strapped to his helmet is a a creative artistic outlet. One component is a stand-up comedy work- wrench for his gun, a first-aid kit and what appears to be a vial of gun oil. If any VFW shop hosted by a Post on Long Island. BY KARI WILLIAMS magazine readers know the identity of this Marine, please contact us with details at [email protected]. Photo by Don ‘A LOT OF DEVASTATION’ McCullin/Contact Press Images. After hurricanes Harvey, Irma and Maria 26 ON THE COVER roared through Texas, Florida and Puer- 14 to Rico last fall, VFW Posts from around Tet Offensive the nation rallied to aid those affected. 20 Comedy Heals Meanwhile, VFW National Headquar- 26 Hurricane Disaster Relief ters had raised nearly $250,000 in finan- 32 An Artist Emerges cial support through the end of October.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 IHBB Canadian Championships Set – Bowl Round 3
    IHBB Canadian Championships Set Bowl 2018-2019 Bowl Round 3 Bowl Round 3 First Quarter (1) Donald Tusk presides over the council that oversees this organization. Four members of this organization are legally obliged to join the Schengen Area, where internal borders are not enforced. This organization was created in 1993 with the signing of the Treaty of Maastricht. Consisting of over 25 member states and over 500 million people, for ten points, name this united organization of nations on a namesake continent. ANSWER: European Union (accept EU) (2) The first leader of this dynasty placed his grandfather on imperial records as the official founder of this dynasty under the name Taizu. This dynasty was defeated by the Tran Dynasty at the Battle of Bach Dang and also failed in an invasion of Java. The last emperor of this dynasty, Toghon Temur, was overthrown by a rebellion named for a piece of headgear. Marco Polo visited, for ten points, what Chinese dynasty founded by Kublai Khan? ANSWER: Yuan Dynasty (3) After an assassination attempt, this man quickly built an effective metal detector to attempt to find the bullet lodged in James Garfield. Elisha Gray is sometimes credited as the actual originator of this man’s most famous invention whose first use involved this man asking his associate Thomas Watson “come here! I want you!” For ten points, name this Scottish-Canadian inventor of the telephone. ANSWER: Alexander Graham Bell (4) Medea attempted to arrange for this man’s death by having him kill the Marathonian Bull, and he earlier completed the Six Labours.
    [Show full text]
  • The Society for Historians of American Foreign Relations Review
    PASSPORT THE SOCIETY FOR HISTORIANS OF AMERICAN FOREIGN RELATIONS REVIEW VOLUME 52, NO. 2 SEPTEMBER 2021 IN THIS ISSUE A Conversation with David Langbart Principles in Power: A Roundtable FDR and the Transformation of Power ...AND MORE Passport THE SOCIETY FOR HISTORIANS OF AMERICAN FOREIGN RELATIONS REVIEW Editor Andrew L. Johns, Brigham Young University Assistant Editor Brionna Mendoza, The Ohio State University Production Editor Julie Rojewski, Michigan State University Editorial Advisory Board Kelly McFarland, Georgetown University (2019-2021) Michael Brenes, Yale University (2020-2022) Amanda Demmer, Virginia Tech (2021-2023) Founding Editors Mitchell Lerner, The Ohio State University (2003-2011) William J. Brinker, Tennessee Technological University (1980-2003) Nolan Fowler, Tennessee Technological University (1973-1980) Gerald E. Wheeler, San Jose State College (1969-1973) Cover Image: December, 1942. Franklin D. Roosevelt being presented a globe by the United States Army at the White House in Washington, D.C. Courtesy of the Franklin D. Roosevelt Presidential Library & Museum. Photo ID: Photo ID: 61244. Passport Editorial Office: SHAFR Business Office: Andrew Johns Amy Sayward, Executive Director Department of History Department of History Brigham Young University Middle Tennessee State University 2161 JFSB, Provo, UT 84602 1301 East Main Street, Box 23 [email protected] Murfreesboro, TN 37132 801-422-8942 (phone) [email protected] 801-422-0275 (fax) 615-898-2569 Passport is published three times per year (April, September, January), by the Society for Historians of American Foreign Relations, and is distributed to all members of the Society. Submissions should be sent to the attention of the editor, and are acceptable in all formats, although electronic copy by email to [email protected] is preferred.
    [Show full text]
  • Vietnam Case Study
    Elite Bargains and Political Deals Project: Vietnam Case Study Jeffrey H. Michaels Stabilisation Unit February 2018 This report has been produced by an independent expert. The views contained within do not necessarily reflect UK government policy. Author details The author is a Senior Lecturer, Defence Studies Department, Kings College London. This case study draws on a combination of primary and secondary sources. The primary sources are mainly limited to US Government documents, particularly those dealing with the internal deliberations of the Nixon administration as well as the minutes of meetings at the 1972-1973 Paris peace talks. The secondary sources used include a much wider range, such as general histories of the conflict, as well as more specific diplomatic histories that draw on primary source material from each of the key participants in the conflict (US, North Vietnam, South Vietnam, Provisional Revolutionary Government, USSR and China). Background to Elite Bargains and Political Deals Project This case study is one of a series commissioned to support the Stabilisation Unit’s (SU’s) development of an evidence base relating to elite bargains and political deals. The project explores how national and international interventions have and have not been effective in fostering and sustaining political deals and elite bargains; and whether or not these political deals and elite bargains have helped reduce violence, increased local, regional and national stability and contributed to the strengthening of the relevant political settlement. Drawing on the case studies, the SU has developed a series of summary papers that bring together the project’s key findings and will underpin the revision of the existing ‘UK Approach to Stabilisation’ (2014) paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Vietnam: Tet Offensive Resource Packet
    Virginians at War Vietnam: Tet Offensive Resource Packet Contains: Glossary, Timeline, Images, Discussion Questions, Additional Resources Program Description: Virginians at War: The Tet Offensive explores the experience of Virginians that fought during the critical Tet Offensive in 1968, a turning point of the Vietnam War. Launched by the North Vietnamese Army on 30 January, the coordinated attack against thirteen different provincial capitals throughout South Vietnam took Americans and South Vietnamese by surprise. The result was a costly, long campaign that ended in a hard –fought military victory for the United States and South Vietnamese. However, the outcome of the campaign had a significantly negative impact on support for the war in the United States, from which the nation would not fully recover. Copyright: Virginia War Memorial Foundation, 2006 Length: 18:59 Streaming link: https://vimeo.com/367038067 Featured Speakers: MSG Lonnie S. Ashton, Montross SPC Orthea Harcum, Richmond MSG Lauren P. Bands, Colonial Heights LT Hugh D. Keogh, Midlothian COL Robert C. Barrett, Jr., Colonial Heights SGT Prentis Lee, Clifton LT COL Frank S. Blair, Richmond SP/4 Powhatan “Red Cloud” Owen, Charles City MSG Charles M. Carter, Warsaw SGM Douglass I. Randolph, Charlotte Court House SGT Earl E. Cousins, Ashland MAJ John A. Rawls, M.D., Mechanicsville CPT James H. Dement, Jr., Richmond 1st LT Cathie Lynn Solomonson, R.N., Woodbridge 1st LT Daniel G. Doyle, Richmond 1st LT James F. Walker, Roanoke LT COL John D. Edgerton, Williamsburg For a transcript of this program and more information on the Vietnam War, please visit vawarmemorial.org/learn/resources/vietnam.
    [Show full text]
  • Air America in South Vietnam I – from the Days of CAT to 1969
    Air America in South Vietnam I From the days of CAT to 1969 by Dr. Joe F. Leeker First published on 11 August 2008, last updated on 24 August 2015 I) At the times of CAT Since early 1951, a CAT C-47, mostly flown by James B. McGovern, was permanently based at Saigon1 to transport supplies within Vietnam for the US Special Technical and Economic Mission, and during the early fifties, American military and economic assistance to Indochina even increased. “In the fall of 1951, CAT did obtain a contract to fly in support of the Economic Aid Mission in FIC [= French Indochina]. McGovern was assigned to this duty from September 1951 to April 1953. He flew a C-47 (B-813 in the beginning) throughout FIC: Saigon, Hanoi, Phnom Penh, Vientiane, Nhatrang, Haiphong, etc., averaging about 75 hours a month. This was almost entirely overt flying.”2 CAT’s next operations in Vietnam were Squaw I and Squaw II, the missions flown out of Hanoi in support of the French garrison at Dien Bien Phu in 1953/4, using USAF C-119s painted in the colors of the French Air Force; but they are described in the file “Working in Remote Countries: CAT in New Zealand, Thailand-Burma, French Indochina, Guatemala, and Indonesia”. Between mid-May and mid-August 54, the CAT C-119s continued dropping supplies to isolated French outposts and landed loads throughout Vietnam. When the Communists incited riots throughout the country, CAT flew ammunition and other supplies from Hanoi to Saigon, and brought in tear gas from Okinawa in August.3 Between 12 and 14 June 54, CAT captain
    [Show full text]
  • The US Media's Propaganda During the Gulf of Tonkin Incident
    Student Publications Student Scholarship Spring 2020 “Reds Driven Off”: the US Media’s Propaganda During the Gulf of Tonkin Incident Steven M. Landry Gettysburg College Follow this and additional works at: https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/student_scholarship Part of the Journalism Studies Commons, and the United States History Commons Share feedback about the accessibility of this item. Recommended Citation Landry, Steven M., "“Reds Driven Off”: the US Media’s Propaganda During the Gulf of Tonkin Incident" (2020). Student Publications. 787. https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/student_scholarship/787 This open access student research paper is brought to you by The Cupola: Scholarship at Gettysburg College. It has been accepted for inclusion by an authorized administrator of The Cupola. For more information, please contact [email protected]. “Reds Driven Off”: the US Media’s Propaganda During the Gulf of Tonkin Incident Abstract In 2008, the Annenburg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania conducted a poll to determine just how informed voters were following that year’s presidential election. One of the most shocking things they found was that 46.4% of those polled still believed that Saddam Hussein played a role in the terrorist attacks on the US on September 11th, 2001. No evidence had ever emerged linking him to it after 5 years of war in Iraq, but that did not matter, as “voters, once deceived, tend to stay that way despite all evidence.” Botched initial reporting can permanently entrench false information into the public’s mind and influence them ot come to faulty conclusions as a result. This power of first impressions gives journalists an immense and solemn responsibility when conveying events.
    [Show full text]