Журавли Евразии Cranes of Eurasia
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Transboundary Cooperation for Nature Conservation World Trends and Ways Forward in Northeast Asia
NEASPEC WORKING PAPER Transboundary Cooperation for Nature Conservation World Trends and Ways Forward in Northeast Asia February 2015 This working paper was prepared by Alexandre Edwardes, intern for NEASPEC, under the supervision of Sangmin Nam, Deputy Head, East and North-East Asia Office of the ESCAP. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. This paper follows United Nations practice in references to countries. Where there are space constraints, some country names have been abbreviated. Transboundary Cooperation for Nature Conservation Alexandre Edwardes Transboundary Cooperation for Nature Conservation World Trends and Ways Forward in Northeast Asia (May 2015) Table of Contents 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 3 2. Transboundary Conservation Initiatives Worldwide ............................................................................. 4 a. Brief history and current trends in transboundary conservation ...................................................... 4 b. Definitions and designations of transboundary conservation initiatives .......................................... 5 • Transboundary Protected Areas .................................................................................................... -
RCN #33 21/8/03 13:57 Page 1
RCN #33 21/8/03 13:57 Page 1 No. 33 Summer 2003 Special issue: The Transformation of Protected Areas in Russia A Ten-Year Review PROMOTING BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION IN RUSSIA AND THROUGHOUT NORTHERN EURASIA RCN #33 21/8/03 13:57 Page 2 CONTENTS CONTENTS Voice from the Wild (Letter from the Editors)......................................1 Ten Years of Teaching and Learning in Bolshaya Kokshaga Zapovednik ...............................................................24 BY WAY OF AN INTRODUCTION The Formation of Regional Associations A Brief History of Modern Russian Nature Reserves..........................2 of Protected Areas........................................................................................................27 A Glossary of Russian Protected Areas...........................................................3 The Growth of Regional Nature Protection: A Case Study from the Orlovskaya Oblast ..............................................29 THE PAST TEN YEARS: Making Friends beyond Boundaries.............................................................30 TRENDS AND CASE STUDIES A Spotlight on Kerzhensky Zapovednik...................................................32 Geographic Development ........................................................................................5 Ecotourism in Protected Areas: Problems and Possibilities......34 Legal Developments in Nature Protection.................................................7 A LOOK TO THE FUTURE Financing Zapovedniks ...........................................................................................10 -
The Trophic Ecology of Wolves and Their Predatory Role in Ungulate Communities of Forest Ecosystems in Europe
Acta Theriologica 40 (4): 335-386,1095, REVIEW PL ISSN 0001-7051 The trophic ecology of wolves and their predatory role in ungulate communities of forest ecosystems in Europe Henryk OKARMA Okarma H. 1995. The trophic ecology of wolves and their predatory role in ungulate communities of forest ecosystems in Europe. Acta Theriologica 40: 335-386. Predation by wolves Canis lupus Linnaeus, 1758 in ungulate communities in Europe, with special reference to the multi-species system of Białowieża Primeval Forest (Poland/Belarus), was assessed on the basis results of original research and literature. In historical times (post-glacial period), the geographical range of the wolf and most ungulate species in Europe decreased considerably. Community richness of ungulates and potential prey for wolves, decreased over most of the continent from 5-6 species to 2-3 species. The wolf is typically an opportunistic predator with a highly diverse diet; however, cervids are its preferred prey. Red deer Ceruus elaphus are positively selected from ungulate communities in all localities, moose Alces alces are the major prey only where middle-sized species are scarce. Roe deer Capreolus capreolus are locally preyed on intensively, especially where they have high density, co-exist mainly with moose or wild boar Sus scrofa, and red deer is scarce or absent. Wild boar are generally avoided, except in a few locations; and European bison Bison bonasus are not preyed upon by wolves. Wolf predation contributes substantially to the total natural mortality of ungulates in Europe: 42.5% for red deer, 34.5% for moose, 25.7% for roe der, and only 16% for wild boar. -
Moss Diversity Distribution Patterns and Agglomerates of Local Floras in the Russian Far East
Botanica Pacifica. A journal of plant science and conservation. 2017. 6(2): 21–33 DOI: 10.17581/bp.2017.06201 Moss diversity distribution patterns and agglomerates of local floras in the Russian Far East Olga Yu. Pisarenko 1* & Vadim A. Bakalin 2 Olga Yu. Pisarenko1* ABSTRACT email: [email protected] Published materials on the mosses of the Russian Far East are summarized. Nine Vadim A. Bakalin 2 hund red and thirty species of mosses were revealed, and a bibliography is provi email: [email protected] ded for each taxon. The distribution of each taxon within 39 spatial units (5×5 de grees latitude/longitude) is analyzed. The list for each square was regarded 1 Central Siberian Botanical Garden, SB as the flo ra of minimal size involved in analysis. Analysis of interrelationships RAS, Novosibirsk 630090 Russia be tween each minimal flora has revealed seven floristic associations that corres 2 Botanical GardenInstitute FEB RAS, pond to the following territories: Beringian Chukotka, the continental part of Vladivostok 690024 Russia Chu kotka Autonomous District and continental part of Magadan Province, nor thern coast of the Sea of Okhotsk, Kamchatka and adjacent islands, Sakhalin and southern Kurils, Russian Manchuria, and the rest part of continental sou thern Russian Far East. Centers of moss species diversity are considered. * corresponding author Keywords: Russian Far East, mosses, bryoflora, distribution patterns, diversity, con servation, phytogeography Manuscript received: 17.02.2017 РЕЗЮМЕ Review completed: 13.09.2017 Писаренко О.Ю., Бакалин В.А. Закономерности распространения Accepted for publication: 18.09.2017 раз нообразия мхов и естественные агломераты локальных моховых Published online: 19.09.2017 флор на российском Дальнем Востоке. -
Hymenoptera, Vespidae) Орхон-Селенгинской Впадины Монголии
1 МИНИСТЕРСТВО ОБРАЗОВАНИЯ И НАУКИ РОССИЙСКОЙ ФЕДЕРАЦИИ Бурятский государственный университет На правах рукописи БАТЧУЛУУН БУЯНЖАРГАЛ ФАУНА И ЭКОЛОГИЯ СКЛАДЧАТОКРЫЛЫХ ОС (HYMENOPTERA, VESPIDAE) ОРХОН-СЕЛЕНГИНСКОЙ ВПАДИНЫ МОНГОЛИИ 03.02.08 — экология Диссертация на соискание ученой степени кандидата биологических наук Научный руководитель: доктор биологических наук, профессор Ц. З. Доржиев Иркутск — 2016 2 ОГЛАВЛЕНИЕ ВВЕДЕНИЕ ………………………………………………………………. 4 Глава 1. СКЛАДЧАТОКРЫЛЫЕ ОСЫ СЕМЕЙСТВА VESPIDAE (HYMENOPTERA) И ИСТОРИЯ ИХ ИЗУЧЕНИЯ 1.1. Краткая характеристика складчатокрылых ос…………………….. 9 1.1.1. Общие сведения о складчатокрылых осах (Vespidae)... 9 1.1.2. Одиночные складчатокрылые осы подсемейств Masarinae и Eumeninae………………………………………… 11 1.1.3. Общественные складчатокрылые осы подсемейств Polistinae и Vespinae……………………………………………. 14 1.2. История изучения складчатокрылых ос в Монголии…………….. 17 Глава 2. РАЙОН ИССЛЕДОВАНИЙ, МАТЕРИАЛ И МЕТОДЫ 2.1. Особенности природных условий района исследований…………. 21 2.2. Материал и методы…………………………………………………... 28 Глава 3. СИСТЕМАТИЧЕСКИЙ И ЭКОЛОГО-ГЕОГРАФИЧЕСКИЙ АНАЛИЗ ФАУНЫ СКЛАДЧАТОКРЫЛЫХ ОС ОРХОН-СЕЛЕНГИНСКОЙ ВПАДИНЫ 3.1 Краткий анализ таксономического состава складчатокрылых ос Vespidae Монголии………………………………………………………. 36 3.2 Таксономический состав и распространение складчатокрылых ос Орхон-Селенгинской впадины (аннотированный список)………………… 37 3.3 Внутрипопуляционные социальные группы и их соотношение в фауне веспид …………………………………………………………… 72 3.4 Ареалогический анализ ……………………………………………. 72 3.4.1. -
Îõðàíÿåìûå Ïðèðîäíûå Òåððèòîðèè(Àíãë).Pm6
PROTECTED AREAS IN RUSSIA: LEGAL REGULATION Moscow v 2003 2 Protected Areas in Russia: Legal Regulation. An Overview of ederal Laws. Edited by A.S.Shestakov. KMK Scientific Press Ltd., Moscow, 2003. xvi + 352 p. Reviewer: Dr. O.A.Samonchik, Devision of Agrarian and Land Laws, Institute of State and Law, Russian Academy of Sciences G.A. Kozulko, international expert on protected areas, Chief of the Belovezhskaya Puzha XXI Century Public Initiative This research and publication have been made possible by funding from The Service for Implementation of National Biodiversity Strategies and Action Plans (Biodiversity Service) established by a consortium of United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), the World Conservation Union (IUCN), the European Centre for Nature Conservation (ECNC) and the Regional Environmental Centre for Central and Eastern Europe (REC) ã 2003 WW Russia ã 2003 M.L.Kreindlin, A.V.Kuznetcova, V.B.Stepanitskiy, A.S.Shestakov, ISBN 5-87317-132-7 E.V.Vyshegorodskih 3 LIST O ACRONIMS ATNM area of traditional nature management of indigenous peoples of the North, Siberia and the ar East of the Russian ederation IUCN The World Conservation Union MNR Ministry of Natural Resources of the Russian ederation NP national park PA protected area R Russian ederation SPNA specially protected natural area SSNR state strict nature reserve (zapovednik) WW World Wide und for Nature 4 TABLES AND IGURES Tables: Table 1. Number and Area of Specially Protected Natural Areas in Russia (as of the beginning of 2003) Table 2. Matrix of Management Purposes of Specially Protected Natural Areas of Russia Table 3. Proposals for Establishing State Strict Nature Reserves and National Parks in the Russian ederation for 2001-2010 Table 4. -
Securing a Future for Amur Leopards and Tigers in Russia
Securing a Future for Amur Leopards and Tigers in Russia – VI 2018 Final Report Phoenix Fund 1 Securing a Future for Amur Leopards and Tigers in Russia – VI • 2018 Final Report TABLE OF CONTENTS Background ................................................................................................................................................... 2 Project Summary ........................................................................................................................................... 3 Project Activities............................................................................................................................................ 4 SMART in five protected areas .................................................................................................................. 4 Annual workshop for educators ................................................................................................................ 8 Education in Khasan, Lazo, Terney and Vladivostok ................................................................................. 9 Tiger Day in Primorye .............................................................................................................................. 11 Art Contest .............................................................................................................................................. 13 Photo credits: PRNCO “Tiger “Centre”, Far Eastern Operational Customs Office, Land of the Leopard National Park, Alexander Ratnikov, and children's paintings -
Moscow 2019 A.N
Moscow 2019 A.N . SEVERTSOV INSTITUTE OF ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION OF THE RUSSIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES PERMANENT EXPEDITION OF RUSSIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES FOR STUDY OF RUSSIAN RED DATA BOOK ANIMALS AND OTHER KEY ANIMALS OF RUSSIAN FAUNA Rozhnov V.V., Yachmennikova A.A., Hernandez-Blanco J.A., Naidenko S.V., Chistopolova M.D., Sorokin P.A., Dobrynin D.V., Sukhova O.V., Poyarkov A.D., Dronova N.A., Trepet S.A., Pkhitikov A.B., Pshegusov R.H., Magomedov M.-R.D. STUDY AND MONITORING OF BIG CATS IN RUSSIA KMK Scientific Press Moscow 2019 Rozhnov V.V., Yachmennikova A.A., Hernandez-Blanco J.A., Naidenko S.V., Chisto- polova M.D., Sorokin P.A., Dobrynin D.V., Sukhova O.V., Poyarkov A.D., Drono- va N.A., Trepet S.A., Pkhitikov A.B., Pshegusov R.H., Magomedov M.-R.D. Study and Monitoring of Big Cats in Russia. Moscow: KMK Scientific Press Ltd., 2019. 138 p. This monograph provides a comprehensive review and analysis of the available litera- ture on the monitoring of big cats. Special attention is paid to the most up-to-date methods based on recent advances in technology, resulting in useful tools to remotely and non- invasively study animals in natural habitats, essential when working with rare species. Existing large- and small-scale approaches to monitoring big cats are described. Methods of monitoring the habitat conditions of the species and their dynamics, as well as the basics of modeling territories with suitable conditions for leopards, are suggested. The whole range of field sampling methods that enable data to be processed using contempo- rary techniques is described. -
Биота И Среда Заповедных Территорий Issn 2618-6764 Научный Рецензируемый Журнал 2018, № 1 Журнал Основан В 2013 Году, Издаётся С 2014 Года
БИОТА И СРЕДА ЗАПОВЕДНЫХ ТЕРРИТОРИЙ ISSN 2618-6764 НАУЧНЫЙ РЕЦЕНЗИРУЕМЫЙ ЖУРНАЛ 2018, № 1 Журнал основан в 2013 году, издаётся с 2014 года. В 2014-2017 гг. имел название «Биота и среда заповедников Дальнего Востока. Biodiversity and Environment of Far East Reserves» (ISSN 2227-149X). Учредители: Дальневосточное отделение Российской академии наук и «Дальневосточный морской заповедник» — филиал Национального научного центра морской биологии Дальневосточного отделения Российской академии наук. Редколлегия: главный редактор — Богатов Виктор Всеволодович, член-корр. РАН, проф., главный учёный секретарь, Дальневосточное отделение РАН (ДВО РАН), Владивосток; зам. главного редактора — Дроздов Анатолий Леонидович, проф., гнс, Национальный научный центр морской биологии (ННЦМБ ДВО РАН), Владивосток; отв. секретарь редколлегии — Тюрин Алексей Николаевич, и. о. зав. редакцией журнала, вед. инж., «Дальневосточный морской заповедник» — филиал ННЦМБ ДВО РАН; Богачёва Анна Вениаминовна, снс, Федеральный научного центр биоразнообразия наземной биоты Восточной Азии ДВО РАН (ФНЦБ ДВО РАН), Владивосток; Боркин Лев Яковлевич, снс, Зоологический институт РАН (ЗИН РАН), Санкт-Петербург; Глущенко Юрий Николаевич, проф., Дальневосточный федеральный университет (ДВФУ), филиал в г. Уссурийске; Дьякова Ольга Васильевна, проф., зав. лаб., Институт истории, археологии и этнографии народов Дальнего Востока ДВО РАН (ИИАЭ ДВО РАН), Владивосток; Ильин Игорь Николаевич, внс, Институт проблем экологии и эволюции им. А. Н. Северцова РАН, Москва; Нечаев Виталий Андреевич , внс, ФНЦБ ДВО РАН, Владивосток; Попов Владимир Константинович, внс, Дальневосточный геологический институт ДВО РАН (ДВГИ ДВО РАН), Владивосток; Пушкарь Владимир Степанович, проф., зав. лаб., ДВГИ ДВО РАН, Владивосток; Пшеничников Борис Фёдорович, проф., ДВФУ, Владивосток; Разжигаева Надежда Глебовна, зав. лаб., Тихоокеанский институт географии ДВО РАН (ТИГ ДВО РАН), Владивосток; Рябушко Виталий Иванович, зав. отд., Институт морских биологических исследований имени А. О. -
Colubridae: Natricinae) В Российской Части Ареала Э
Амурский зоологический журнал, 2020, т. XII, № 4 Amurian Zoological Journal, 2020, vol. XII, no. 4 www.azjournal.ru УДК [598.1](571.6) DOI: 10.33910/2686-9519-2020-12-4-524-539 http://zoobank.org/References/84B890B4-237A-43DA-9F32-B0E44D153EB7 ОСОБЕННОСТИ РАСПРОСТРАНЕНИЯ ЯПОНСКОГО УЖА HEBIUS VIBAKARI (H. BOIE, 1826) (COLUBRIDAE: NATRICINAE) В РОССИЙСКОЙ ЧАСТИ АРЕАЛА Э. В. Аднагулов Институт водных и экологических проблем ДВО РАН, ул. Дикопольцева, д. 56, 680000, г. Хабаровск, Россия Сведения об авторе Аннотация. Японский уж в России распространен преимущественно Аднагулов Эдуард Вильевич в южных районах материковой части Дальнего Востока (Приморский E-mail: [email protected] край), с середины XX в. отмечается в более северных районах SPIN-код: 5779-2950 (Среднеамурская низменность и сопредельные территории). Основными местообитаниями вида являются преимущественно низкогорные участки и долины рек, покрытые широколиственными и хвойно-широколиственными лесами. В силу скрытного образа жизни японский уж может встречаться вблизи населенных пунктов. Основная кормовая база (дождевые черви, молодь земноводных) представляется достаточной. Северные группировки, по-видимому, изолированы друг от друга и являются реликтовыми. Права: © Автор (2020). Опубликова- но Российским государственным педагогическим университетом им. А. И. Герцена. Открытый доступ на Ключевые слова: японский уж, Hebius vibakari, широколиственные леса, условиях лицензии CC BY-NC 4.0. распространение, Дальний Восток России. THE DISTRIBUTION OF HEBIUS VIBAKARI (H. BOIE, 1826) (COLUBRIDAE: NATRICINAE) IN ITS RUSSIAN RANGE E. V. Adnagulov Institute of Water and Ecological Problems FEB RAS, 56 Dikopoltsev Str., 680000, Khabarovsk Russia Author Abstract. In Russia, the Japanese keelback snake is distributed mainly in the Eduard V. Adnagulov southern areas of the continental part of the Far East (Primorsky Krai). -
New Occurrences of Corticioid and Poroid Fungi (Basidiomycota) in Kedrovaya Pad Nature Reserve, Primorye Territory, Russian Far East
Folia Cryptog. Estonica, Fasc. 54: 43–50 (2017) http://dx.doi.org/10.12697/fce.2017.54.08 New occurrences of corticioid and poroid fungi (Basidiomycota) in Kedrovaya Pad Nature Reserve, Primorye Territory, Russian Far East Ilya A. Viner & Lyudmila Yu. Kokaeva Moscow State University, Faculty of Biology, Russia. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] Abstract: New data on corticioid and poroid basidiomycetes from Kedrovaya Pad Nature Reserve, Primorye Territory, Russian Far East, is presented. Altogether there are 182 known species from the reserve; 76 are reported as new to the reserve and two as new to Russia. The material was collected in July of 2016 from 9 study plots located in forests of different types. Findings of some rarely collected species such as Botryobasidium botryoideum, Cerinomyces aff. aculeatus, Junghuhnia aurantilaeta, Phanerochaete robusta and Tyromyces wynneae are briefly discussed. The full-length ITS sequences ofJunghuhnia aurantilaeta, Phanerochaete robusta, Pyrrhoderma cf. sendaiense and Tyromyces wynneae were obtained and deposited in the GenBank. Junghuhnia aurantilaeta is proposed to be included in the new edition of the Red Data Book of Primorye Territory. The paper expands the knowledge of distribution of many species and increases the total number of species reported for the reserve. Keywords: biodiversity; corticioids; polypors; Russian Far East INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS The Kedrovaya Pad Nature Reserve is located on Fruit bodies were collected in Kedrovaya Pad the coastal spurs of the Manchurian Mountains. Nature Reserve, Primorye Territory, Russian The river valley of Kedrovaya river lies between Far East (Fig. 1), near Primorskaya station the Gakkelevsky and Sukhorechensky ridges (43°05’42”N, 131°35’6”E), Khasanskiy district (Fig. -
Long-Term Arrival Trends of 54 Avian Species to Barguzinsky Nature Reserve in the Northeastern Baikal Area
Avian Ecol. Behav. 15, 2009: 31-46. Long-term arrival trends of 54 avian species to Barguzinsky Nature Reserve in the northeastern Baikal area Alexander A. Ananin1 & Leonid V. Sokolov2 Abstract: Ananin, A.A. & Sokolov L.V. (2009): Long-term arrival trends of 54 avian species to Barguzinsky Nature Reserve in the northeastern Baikal area. Avian Ecol. Behav. 15: 31-46. We analysed phenological observations on spring arrival of 54 avian species to Barguzinsky Nature Reserve in 1938-2001. Twenty-eight species (52%) showed a trend towards earlier ar- rival, 14 species (26%) showed a trend towards later arrival. In 12 species (22%) the timing of spring arrival did not change. Most avian species that started to arrive earlier were passerines (65% of species). Later arrival was mainly recorded in waterfowl and birds of prey. Earlier ar- rival recorded in roughly one-half of the species analysed, is probably due to climate warming recorded in the study region in the late 20th century. These species may be treated as pheno- logical indicators illustrating climate change in the northeastern Baikal area. Key words: spring migration, arrival date, long-term trends, climate, Baikal area Address: 1A.A. Ananin: Barguzinsky State Biosphere Reserve, 670045 Ulan-Ude, Russia. E-mail: [email protected] L.V. Sokolov: Biological Station Rybachy, Zoological Institute, 199034 St. Petersburg, Russia. E-mail: [email protected] Received 24 June 2006 / Received in revised form 10 August 2006/ Accepted 1 November 2006. 1. Introduction Long-term change in the timing of phenological events, spring arrival of birds including, has been recently reported from different regions of the Northern hemi- sphere, including Europe (Bulygin & Martynov 1992, Järvinen 1995, Moss 1996, 1998; Bairlein, Winkel 1998, Bergmann 1998, Loxton et al.