DOCSLIB.ORG

Digital Contact Tracing a Comparative Global Study

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Digital Contact Tracing A Comparative Global Study Access Partnership 2020 1 Contents Foreword ................................................................................................................................................................................ 3 Executive Summary and Recommendations ............................................................................................................................ 4 National Approaches to Digital Contact Tracing ....................................................................................................................... 6 Typology of Digital Contact Tracing ......................................................................................................................................... 7 Geolocation .................................................................................................................................................................................. 8 Geolocation Plus .......................................................................................................................................................................... 8 Bluetooth Proximity Tracing ........................................................................................................................................................ 9 Regional Trends ......................................................................................................................................................................10 Europe ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 11 European Union .................................................................................................................................................. 11 United Kingdom .................................................................................................................................................. 12 Germany ............................................................................................................................................................. 13 France ................................................................................................................................................................. 14 Italy ..................................................................................................................................................................... 15 Asia ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 17 China ................................................................................................................................................................... 17 South Korea ........................................................................................................................................................ 18 Singapore ............................................................................................................................................................ 19 Taiwan ................................................................................................................................................................ 20 Japan ................................................................................................................................................................... 21 India .................................................................................................................................................................... 22 Australia .............................................................................................................................................................. 23 Americas ................................................................................................................................................................................... 24 United States ...................................................................................................................................................... 24 Canada ................................................................................................................................................................ 26 Mexico ................................................................................................................................................................ 27 Brazil ................................................................................................................................................................... 28 Colombia ............................................................................................................................................................. 29 Middle East and Africa ............................................................................................................................................................ 30 South Africa ........................................................................................................................................................ 30 Saudi Arabia ........................................................................................................................................................ 31 United Arab Emirates .......................................................................................................................................... 31 Iran ...................................................................................................................................................................... 32 Israel ................................................................................................................................................................... 32 Looking Forward: Post-COVID Policy Impacts .........................................................................................................................34 Accelerating Digitalisation of Everyday Interactions .................................................................................................................. 34 Shifting the Privacy Debate ........................................................................................................................................................ 35 Building the Public Health Surveillance State ............................................................................................................................ 36 Public Health and International Privacy Interoperability ........................................................................................................... 36 Conclusion ..............................................................................................................................................................................38 About Access Partnership .......................................................................................................................................................39 Endnotes ................................................................................................................................................................................40 2 Foreword What is written can be unwritten, what is downloaded can be deleted, and so the digital tracing of contacts between people who risk infection by a punishing virus is broadly to be welcomed. That contact tracing also heightens anxiety about citizen privacy can also be celebrated, at least for the validity of the concern if not for the negative effect it has on uptake of this important tool. This study shows what approaches are best at building citizen confidence. Scope Undertaken to provide a timely overview of how tech-enabled countries have approached use of digital contact tracing to stalk and defeat COVID-19, the insights that follow can be used to predict how the virus crisis will affect privacy policy worldwide. Our findings reveal that, regional variations notwithstanding, privacy is taking a back seat to health concerns across the board. Methodology Our researchers used up-to-the-minute data on national approaches which was validated where necessary by engagements with national stakeholders and policymakers. Questions to officials were informed by the team’s use of Access Partnership’s proprietary database of privacy laws, regulations, and qualitative assessments of how these are applied in each jurisdiction. The timeframe for production of this study was a narrow ten working days. Understanding the Gaps While this report explains the extent to which national approaches to contact tracing vary, a majority of countries have no such option at all. The requisite digital tools for effective contact tracing – access to smartphones, operating systems and platforms, Bluetooth equipment, apps, and wireless communications – are not available to all countries in equal measure. In that 49% of the world which remains digitally unconnected, virus fightback must start with adoption of policies that enable countries to take advantage of great leaps in pandemic-busting ingenuity. In this, as in matters of coding, cloud and connectivity, technology firms worldwide are ready with technical solutions and policy advice to governments. Their offers of help should not be ignored: made in good faith,
Recommended publications
  • Lessons from Countries Implementing Find, Test, Trace, Isolation and Support Policies in the Rapid Response of the COVID-19 Pandemic: a Systematic Review

    Lessons from Countries Implementing Find, Test, Trace, Isolation and Support Policies in the Rapid Response of the COVID-19 Pandemic: a Systematic Review

    BMJ Open: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047832 on 29 June 2021. Downloaded from Open access Original research Lessons from countries implementing find, test, trace, isolation and support policies in the rapid response of the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review Sheng- Chia Chung ,1 Sushila Marlow,2 Nicholas Tobias,3 Alessio Alogna,4 Ivano Alogna,5 San- Lin You,6,7 Kamlesh Khunti,8 Martin McKee ,9 Susan Michie,10 Deenan Pillay11 To cite: Chung S- C, Marlow S, ABSTRACT Strengths and limitations of this study Tobias N, et al. Lessons from Objective To systematically learn lessons from the countries implementing find, experiences of countries implementing find, test, trace, test, trace, isolation and support ► The study systematically reviews the core elements isolate, support (FTTIS) in the first wave of the COVID-19 policies in the rapid response of an effective find, test, trace, isolate, support of the COVID-19 pandemic: a pandemic. (FTTIS) system to interrupt the spread of COVID-19. systematic review. BMJ Open Design, data sources and eligibility criteria We Our findings can inform policy in future pandemics. 2021;11:e047832. doi:10.1136/ searched MEDLINE (PubMed), Cochrane Library, SCOPUS ► We reported optimal strategies reported in the lit- bmjopen-2020-047832 and JSTOR, initially between 31 May 2019 and 21 January erature to shorten case finding time, improve both 2021. Research articles and reviews on the use of contact ► Prepublication history and accuracy and efficiency of tests, coordinate stake- additional supplemental material tracing, testing, self- isolation and quarantine for COVID-19 holders and actors involved in an FTTIS system, sup- for this paper are available management were included in the review.
  • Covid-19 Tracing Contacts Apps: Technical and Privacy Issues

    Covid-19 Tracing Contacts Apps: Technical and Privacy Issues

    Int. J. Advance Soft Compu. Appl, Vol. 12, No. 3, November 2020 ISSN 2074-8523; Copyright © ICSRS Publication, 2020 www.i-csrs.org Covid-19 Tracing Contacts Apps: Technical and Privacy Issues Salaheddin J. Juneidi Computer Engineering Department, Palestine Technical University Khadoorei1, Hebron, West Bank Palestine. e-mail: [email protected] Received 20 July 2020; Accepted 5 October 2020 Abstract Since the start of the year 2020 the world is facing an outbreak of Covid-19 pandemic, technical specialists all over the universe have been scrambling to develop services, apps, and system’s protocols for contactors tracing, with the objective to identify and to notify everyone that gets close with an individual carrier. Some of these apps are lightweight and temporary, while others are diffuse and aggressive. Some of tracing services are developed locally by small interested programmers, while others are large-scale international operations. To date, we have recognized more than 25 large automated contact tracing efforts around the globe, included with details about what they were, how they worked, and the procedures and conditions that were put in place around them. This paper will deal with general data of the most prominent applications in terms of technical approaches used in the world and compare them with regard to the efficiency of tracking covid-19 and compare them with concerning of the people’s privacy who use these apps. Keywords: Covid-19, GPS location, Blue trace, Google/Apple, DP-3T, Apps, Privacy. 1. Introduction Many applications, services and systems have been proposed and launched [1] with an aim to track and identify infected people with objective to reduce or even to prevent physical contact with other people, some of these tracking 1 Special thanks to Palestine Technical University -Khadoorei for continuous support of research efforts Salaheddin J.
  • Singapore's Response to Covid-19

    Singapore's Response to Covid-19

    CHAPTER 4 Singapore’s Response to Covid-19 Abstract This chapter will discuss Singapore’s response to the Covid-19 pandemic, focusing in particular on how it has mobilised and adapted its policy capacities to deal with the pandemic. I will also discuss the new capacities that were established this period. In focusing on how policy capacities were drawn upon or created in its Covid-19 response, this chapter will provide readers with an understanding of the various policy capacities that are necessary for responding to pandemics and other healthcare crises, as well as the capacity limitations or deficiencies that may have posed challenges for policymakers. Keywords Covid-19 · Singapore · Pandemic response · Policy capacity Like the SARS virus, the Covid-19 coronavirus first entered Singapore through its borders. In this case, it was a 66-year-old Chinese national who had arrived in Singapore from Wuhan on 20 January 2020 and was subsequently tested positive for the virus on 23 January 2020 (Yong 2020a). Singapore would within months experience high rates of infec- tion, with the number of confirmed Covid-19 cases exceeding 55,000 as at time of writing. Such high rates of infection were wholly unexpected, given Singapore’s excellent public healthcare system and its reputation as a leading medical hub. © The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature 67 Singapore Pte Ltd. 2021 J. J. Woo, Capacity-building and Pandemics, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-9453-3_4 68 J. J. WOO These high infection rates therefore raise an important question that will be of interest to policy scholars and practitioners alike: how did such high levels of infection occur in a high capacity country such as Singapore? This question will drive the discussions that form the rest of this chapter.
  • Health System Resilience in Managing the COVID-19 Pandemic: Lessons from Singapore

    Health System Resilience in Managing the COVID-19 Pandemic: Lessons from Singapore

    Practice Health system resilience in managing the COVID-19 pandemic: lessons from Singapore 1 1 1 Alvin Qijia Chua , Melisa Mei Jin Tan , Monica Verma , 1 1 1 1 Emeline Kai Lin Han, Li Yang Hsu , Alex Richard Cook , Yik Ying Teo, 1,2 1 Vernon J Lee, Helena Legido- Quigley To cite: Chua AQ, Tan MMJ, ABSTRACT Summary box Verma M, et al. Health Singapore, one of the first countries affected by COVID-19, system resilience in adopted a national strategy for the pandemic which ► Singapore was among the first countries affected by managing the COVID-19 emphasised preparedness through a whole- of- nation pandemic: lessons from COVID-19. Its health system resilience was tested as approach. The pandemic was well contained initially Singapore. BMJ Global Health the pandemic continued to spread following a surge until early April 2020, when there was a surge in cases, 2020;5:e003317. doi:10.1136/ in the number of infected people in early April. attributed to Singapore residents returning from hotspots bmjgh-2020-003317 ► The strength in the response of Singapore to the overseas, and more significantly, rapid transmission COVID-19 pandemic was in part due to coordination locally within migrant worker dormitories. In this paper, Handling editor Seye Abimbola between government agencies. However, we iden- we present the response of Singapore to the COVID-19 tified a few areas of improvement that may provide pandemic based on core dimensions of health system Received 1 July 2020 important learning points for other countries. Revised 23 August 2020 resilience during outbreaks. We also discussed on the ► Understanding reasons for poor uptake of initiatives, Accepted 24 August 2020 surge in cases in April 2020, highlighting efforts to mitigate such as the mobile application for contact tracing, it.
  • Community-Driven Contact Tracing Using Tracetogether

    Community-Driven Contact Tracing Using Tracetogether

    Community-driven contact tracing using TraceTogether This is part of a joint work with Maha Ashour, this is the part I wrote. Introduction Contact tracing is the tracking down of people that were exposed to an individual infected with a virus while they were contagious [1]. It is an important public health intervention that has taken on a renewed urgency in light of the 2019-20 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic [2]. The aim is to lower the burden on healthcare systems due to the virus while incurring smaller economic costs than that of the population wide self quarantine measures being implemented. Contact tracing does this by enabling targeted quarantines and faster testing and isolation of infected individuals. Automatic contact tracing is meant to be a useful and cost-effective supplement to manual contact tracing. The latter is limited by imperfect human recall and/or incomplete information due to the difficulty in identifying unknown contacts or ‘strangers’. Automatic contract tracing can be used to handle a large percentage of the more simple cases so that the limited resources for manual tracing can be directed towards the minority of more complex cases. The primary goal of privacy preserving contact tracing is to facilitate these efforts without putting into place - and normalising - deeper governmental surveillance on civilians. What exactly I mean by privacy preserving will be discussed in the next section. The picture below is from the slides of John D Wilkinson presented at a recent MIT webinar on contact tracing [3]. It shows a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. An ROC curve for a diagnostic system is a plot of true positive rate against false positive rate.
  • A Person-To-Person and Person-To-Place COVID-19 Contact Tracing System Based on OGC Indoorgml

    A Person-To-Person and Person-To-Place COVID-19 Contact Tracing System Based on OGC Indoorgml

    International Journal of Geo-Information Article A Person-to-Person and Person-to-Place COVID-19 Contact Tracing System Based on OGC IndoorGML Soroush Ojagh * , Sara Saeedi and Steve H. L. Liang Department of Geomatics Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4V8, Canada; [email protected] (S.S.); [email protected] (S.H.L.L.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: With the wide availability of low-cost proximity sensors, a large body of research focuses on digital person-to-person contact tracing applications that use proximity sensors. In most contact tracing applications, the impact of SARS-CoV-2 spread through touching contaminated surfaces in enclosed places is overlooked. This study is focused on tracing human contact within indoor places using the open OGC IndoorGML standard. This paper proposes a graph-based data model that considers the semantics of indoor locations, time, and users’ contexts in a hierarchical structure. The functionality of the proposed data model is evaluated for a COVID-19 contact tracing application with scalable system architecture. Indoor trajectory preprocessing is enabled by spatial topology to detect and remove semantically invalid real-world trajectory points. Results show that 91.18% percent of semantically invalid indoor trajectory data points are filtered out. Moreover, indoor trajectory data analysis is innovatively empowered by semantic user contexts (e.g., disinfecting activities) extracted from user profiles. In an enhanced contact tracing scenario, considering the disinfecting activities and sequential order of visiting common places outperformed contact tracing results by filtering out unnecessary potential contacts by 44.98 percent. However, the average execution time of person-to-place contact tracing is increased by 58.3%.
  • Digital Tools for COVID-19 Contact Tracing

    Digital Tools for COVID-19 Contact Tracing

    Digital tools for COVID-19 contact tracing Annex: Contact tracing in the context of COVID-19 2 June 2020 Background electronic data entry of case and contact information. Outbreak response tools can be used to facilitate all aspects Contact tracing is an essential public health measure and a of contact tracing, including case investigation, listing and critical component of comprehensive strategies to control the monitoring of contacts, and automating analysis and spread of COVID-19. Contact tracing breaks the chains of human-to-human transmission by identifying people exposed performance monitoring. Because contacts may have links to to confirmed cases, quarantining them, following up with multiple cases, and may become cases that generate further them to ensure rapid isolation, and testing and treatment in contacts, effective outbreak response tools need to manage case they develop symptoms. When implemented dynamic relationships between cases and contacts. Outbreak systematically and effectively, these actions can ensure that response tools should be optimized for the workflow of field the number of new cases generated by each confirmed case is workers conducting contact tracing as well as providing maintained below one. functionality for supervisors to monitor the implementation 3 In the context of COVID-19, contact tracing requires of contact tracing. The Go.Data software application, created identifying persons who may have been exposed to a person by WHO with partners of the Global Outbreak Alert and with COVID-19 and following them up daily for 14 days Response Network, was designed specifically for field from the last point of exposure.1 Since COVID-19 workers and has been implemented in many countries for transmission can occur before symptoms develop, contacts COVID-19.
  • Automated and Semi-Automated Contact Tracing: Protocol for a Rapid Review of Available Evidence and Current Challenges to Inform the Control of COVID-19

    Automated and Semi-Automated Contact Tracing: Protocol for a Rapid Review of Available Evidence and Current Challenges to Inform the Control of COVID-19

    medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.14.20063636; this version posted April 17, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license . Automated and semi-automated contact tracing: Protocol for a rapid review of available evidence and current challenges to inform the control of COVID-19 Isobel Braithwaite1, Tom Callender2, Miriam Bullock3, Robert W Aldridge1 1 Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK 2 Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK 3UCL Collaborative Centre for Inclusion Health, University College London, London UK Abstract Introduction Traditional approaches to case-finding, case isolation, and contact tracing methods have so far proved insufficient on their own to prevent the development of local epidemics of COVID-19 in many high-income countries despite relatively advanced public health systems. As a result, many governments have resorted to widespread social distancing measures and mass quarantines (‘lock-downs’) to reduce transmission and to prevent healthcare systems from being overwhelmed. However, such measures impose heavy human and societal costs. Automated or semi-automated digital contact tracing, in conjunction with scaled-up community testing, has been proposed as a key part of exit strategies from lockdowns. However, the effectiveness of these approaches to contact tracing is unclear, and to be effective, trusted, and widely adopted such technology must overcome several challenges. Methods and analysis We will perform a rapid systematic review to assess the effectiveness of automated and semi- automated digital tools for contact tracing, and identify key considerations for successful implementation, to inform the control of COVID-19.
  • Digital Contact Tracing and the Coronavirus: Israeli and Comparative Perspectives

    Digital Contact Tracing and the Coronavirus: Israeli and Comparative Perspectives

    DIGITAL CONTACT TRACING AND THE CORONAVIRUS: ISRAELI AND COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVES TEHILLA SHWARTZ ALTSHULER RACHEL ARIDOR HERSHKOVITZ GOVERNANCE | AUGUST 2020 DIGITAL CONTACT TRACING AND THE CORONAVIRUS: ISRAELI AND COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVES TEHILLA SHWARTZ ALTSHULER RACHEL ARIDOR HERSHKOVITZ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Digital contact tracing is the main technological issue currently facing countries that are dealing with the COVID-19 pandemic. This paper explains the concept of digital contact tracing and highlights its importance as a helpful tool for human epidemiological investigations and for minimizing the spread of the novel coronavirus. It goes on to survey the international scale of policy tools that have been selected for the purpose of digital contact tracing — ranging from China, which imposed mandatory means on all citizens that incorporate artificial intelligence and generate a “health code”; to Asian democracies such as South Korea and Taiwan, which have implemented intrusive digital tracking tools that are run by civil agencies, with no involvement of the secret services; to the democratic countries of Europe as well as Australia, New Zealand, and the United States, which employ digital contact tracing only with citizens’ consent. Israel, it was found, has positioned itself between the Asian democracies and China. We believe that a new outbreak of the pandemic in the winter of 2020-2021 is liable to prompt countries to choose one of two options. The first is to refrain from using digital contact-tracing technology because of its infringement on privacy. We believe this would be the wrong choice, because it means losing a major technological advantage for coping with the virus and would merely reinforce the mistaken argument that privacy and innovation are incompatible.
  • COVID-19 Contact Tracing for Health Departments

    COVID-19 Contact Tracing for Health Departments

    Guidelines for the Implementation and Use of Digital Tools to Augment Traditional Contact Tracing COVID-19 Contact Tracing for Health Departments Version 1 Introduction This document describes two broad categories of digital contact tracing tools, how and where they can improve timeliness and efficiency in the contact tracing process, and defines their minimum and preferred features. This document is based on research and ongoing discussions with contact tracing and informatics experts across local, state, territorial, tribal, and federal government agencies; national public health associations; academic consortia; and nongovernmental organizations. This document builds on previous guidance; it is a living body of knowledge and will be revised frequently in response to new information and the evolving needs of state, local, tribal, and territorial health departments. Use of trade names and commercial sources is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services or the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Tools Overview Case Management Tools Proximity and Exposure Notification Tools Tools that make the traditional contact tracing process Tools that may help identify more contacts and notify faster and more efficient them of exposure faster than traditional contact tracing alone • These tools can streamline the electronic capture and management of data on patients and contacts • Voluntary, opt-in tools using Bluetooth or GPS by enabling automation of contact notification and technologies (most commonly via smartphone follow-up, and by allowing patients and contacts apps) can be used to estimate the proximity and to electronically self-report (e.g. demographic and duration of an individual’s exposure to patient(s) clinical data, contacts, services needed).
  • A Systematic Adversarial Threat Analysis of Contact Tracing Apps

    A Systematic Adversarial Threat Analysis of Contact Tracing Apps

    Western University Scholarship@Western Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository 12-18-2020 10:45 AM Protecting Health Data in a Pandemic: A Systematic Adversarial Threat Analysis of Contact Tracing Apps Leah Krehling, The University of Western Ontario Supervisor: Essex, Aleksander, The University of Western Ontario A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the Master of Engineering Science degree in Electrical and Computer Engineering © Leah Krehling 2020 Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd Part of the Other Electrical and Computer Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Krehling, Leah, "Protecting Health Data in a Pandemic: A Systematic Adversarial Threat Analysis of Contact Tracing Apps" (2020). Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository. 7586. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/7586 This Dissertation/Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Western. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Western. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Abstract In this thesis centralized, decentralized, Bluetooth, and GPS based applications of digital contact tracing were reviewed and assessed. Using privacy principles created by a contingent of security and privacy experts from across Canada, a metric of assessing an application’s privacy was created. An attack tree was built to assess the security of the contact tracing applications. Eighteen attacks were theorized against contact tracing applications currently in use. An application’s vulnerability to the attacks was measured using a scoring system developed for this purpose. The results of the security scores were used to create a metric for assessing the security of contact tracing systems.
  • Checking Contact Tracing App Implementations

    Checking Contact Tracing App Implementations

    Checking Contact Tracing App Implementations Robert Flood1, Sheung Chi Chan2, Wei Chen1 and David Aspinall1;3 1LFCS, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, U.K. 2Department of Computer Science, Heriott-Watt University, Edinburgh, U.K. 3The Alan Turing Institute, London, U.K. Keywords: Static Analysis, Covid-19, Contact Tracing, Android. Abstract: In the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, contact tracing apps have been developed based on digital contact tracing frameworks. These allow developers to build privacy-conscious apps that detect whether an infected individual is in close-proximity with others. Given the urgency of the problem, these apps have been devel- oped at an accelerated rate with a brief testing period. Such quick development may have led to mistakes in the apps’ implementations, resulting in problems with their functionality, privacy and security. To mitigate these concerns, we develop and apply a methodology for evaluating the functionality, privacy and security of Android apps using the Google/Apple Exposure Notification API. This is a three-pronged approach consist- ing of a manual analysis, general static analysis and a bespoke static analysis, using a tool we’ve developed, dubbed MonSTER. As a result, we have found that, although most apps met the basic standards outlined by Google/Apple, there are issues with the functionality of some of these apps that could impact user safety. 1 INTRODUCTION So far, ensuring tracing frameworks maintain strong privacy guarantees has been the focus of re- As governments around the world attempt to contain search, with new privacy-preserving frameworks be- the spread of the COVID-19 virus, the research area ing designed by several parties (Google, 2020; Tron- of digital contact tracing has grown rapidly with sev- coso et al., 2020; Wan and Liu, 2020).