DOCSLIB.ORG

Hampton Roads Congestion Management Process

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hampton Roads Congestion Management Process HAMPTON ROADS CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROCESS SYSTEM PERFORMANCE AND MITIGATION REPORT PART I – INTRODUCTION AND SYSTEM MONITORING DRAFT PREPARED BY: MARCH 2020 T20-XX REPORT DOCUMENTATION ii TITLE: REPORT DATE: Hampton Roads Congestion Management Process: March 2020 System Performance and Mitigation Report Part I – Introduction and System Monitoring GRANT/SPONSORING AGENCY: FHWA/VDOT/LOCAL FUNDS AUTHORS: ORGANIZATION NAME, ADDRESS, & Samuel S. Belfield TELEPHONE Uros Jovanovic Hampton Roads Transportation Planning Keith M. Nichols, P.E. Organization 723 Woodlake Drive PROJECT MANAGER: Chesapeake, Virginia 23320 Keith M. Nichols, P.E. 757.420.8300 http://www.hrtpo.org ABSTRACT ACKNOWLEDGMENTS & DISCLAIMERS As the federally designated Metropolitan Planning Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Organization (MPO) for the Hampton Roads region, Transportation (USDOT), Federal Highway the Hampton Roads Transportation Planning Administration (FHWA), and Virginia Department of Organization (HRTPO) is required by federal Transportation (VDOT). The contents of this report legislation to develop and implement a Congestion reflect the views of the Hampton Roads Transportation Management Process (CMP) as an integrated part of Planning Organization (HRTPO). The HRTPO is the metropolitan transportation planning process. responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data The Hampton Roads CMP is an on-going systematic presented herein. The contents do not necessarily process for managing congestion that provides reflect the official views or policies of the FHWA, information and analysis on multimodal VDOT or Hampton Roads Planning District transportation system performance and on strategies Commission. This report does not constitute a to alleviate congestion and enhance the mobility of standard, specification, or regulation. FHWA or persons and goods regionwide. During this process, VDOT acceptance of this report as evidence of HRTPO works with many stakeholders to develop fulfillment of the objectives of this planning study does these strategies and mobility options. not constitute endorsement/approval of the need for any recommended improvements nor does it This Congestion Management Process Report is constitute approval of their location and design or a being released in three parts. This report – Part I – commitment to fund any such improvements. includes the Introduction and information on System Additional project level environmental impact Monitoring. Part II of the studyDRAFT will highlight assessments and/or studies of alternatives may be System Performance, and Part III will detail necessary. Congestion Mitigation strategies. NON-DISCRIMINATION The HRTPO assures that no person shall, on the ground of race, color, national origin, handicap, sex, age, or income status as provided by Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and subsequent authorities, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subject to discrimination under any program or activity. The HRTPO Title VI Plan provides this assurance, information about HRTPO responsibilities, and a Discrimination Complaint Form. HAMPTON ROADS CONGESTION MANAGEMENT ii P ROCESS: PART I – INTRODUCTION AND SYSTEM MONITORING TABLE OF CONTENTS iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ...............................................................................................................................................................................1 Report Contents ..................................................................................................................................................................2 Performance-Based Planning and Programming ..........................................................................................................3 CMP Elements ....................................................................................................................................................................5 Integrating the CMP into the Planning Process .............................................................................................................6 CMP Goals and Objectives................................................................................................................................................7 CMP Study Area .............................................................................................................................................................. 10 System Monitoring ................................................................................................................................................................ 11 State of Transportation .................................................................................................................................................... 11 HRTPO Annual Roadway Performance Report .......................................................................................................... 12 Regional Performance Measures and Targets .............................................................................................................. 13 Regional Roadway Travel and Trends .......................................................................................................................... 15 Regional Roadway Travel ........................................................................................................................................ 15 Truck Travel ............................................................................................................................................................... 17 Bridges and Tunnels ........................................................................................................................................................ 18 Hampton Roads Harbor Crossings ........................................................................................................................ 19 Chesapeake Bay Crossing ........................................................................................................................................ 19 Elizabeth River Crossings ........................................................................................................................................ 20 York River Crossing .................................................................................................................................................. 21 Bridge/Tunnel Traffic Volumes ............................................................................................................................... 22 Recently Completed Roadway Improvements ............................................................................................................ 24 Benefits of Selected Completed Roadway Improvements .................................................................................. 26 DRAFT HAMPTON ROADS CONGESTION MANAGEMENT iii P ROCESS: PART I – INTRODUCTION AND SYSTEM MONITORING TABLE OF CONTENTS iv LIST OF MAPS Map 1 – Hampton Roads Metropolitan Planning Area ..................................................................................................... 10 Map 2 – Major Regional Bridges and Tunnels .................................................................................................................... 18 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 – Transportation Performance Management (TPM) Elements ............................................................................3 Figure 2 – Framework for Performance-Based Planning and Programming (PBPP) ......................................................4 Figure 3 – Elements of the Congestion Management Process .............................................................................................5 Figure 4 – Steps for Integrating the CMP into the Metropolitan Planning Process .........................................................6 Figure 5 – Goals and Objectives for the Hampton Roads 2045 LRTP ................................................................................9 Figure 6 – HRTPO Regional Performance Measure Targets (as of December 2019) ...................................................... 14 Figure 7 – Daily Vehicle-Miles of Travel in Hampton Roads, 2009-2018 ........................................................................ 15 Figure 8 – Change in Regional Roadway Travel Based on Continuous Count Stations, 2000-2018 ............................ 15 Figure 9 – Daily Vehicle-Miles of Travel per Capita in Large Metropolitan Areas, 2017.............................................. 16 Figure 10 – Number of Trucks Passing through Hampton Roads Gateways Each Weekday, 2009-2018 ................... 17 Figure 11 – Daily Truck Travel in Hampton Roads, 2009-2018 ........................................................................................ 17 Figure 12 – Annual Average Daily Traffic Volumes Crossing the Hampton Roads Harbor and Elizabeth River Southern Branch, 1990 - 2018 .......................................................................................................................................... 22 Figure 13 – Major Roadway Projects Completed in Hampton Roads, 2010 – 2019 ........................................................ 25 Figure 14 – Pre- and Post-Widening Travel Times – I-64 Segment 1 ............................................................................... 28 Figure 15 – Pre- and Post-Widening Travel Times – Dominion Boulevard/Veterans Bridge......................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • HAMPTON ROADS CLOSURES on WATER CROSSINGS, INTERSTATES and OTHER NOTABLE DETOURS for the Week of March 21-27
    RELEASE: IMMEDIATE March 19, 2021 CONTACT: Media Line: 757-956-3032 [email protected] HAMPTON ROADS CLOSURES ON WATER CROSSINGS, INTERSTATES AND OTHER NOTABLE DETOURS For the week of March 21-27 NOTE: This list covers full closures of interstates, ramps, bridges and primary roads, and lane closures at the bridge-tunnels and the Berkley, Coleman, High Rise and James River bridges. *Scheduled closures are subject to change based on weather conditions and other factors.* ​For information on the many other lane closures necessary for maintenance and construction throughout Hampton Roads, visit 511Virginia.org, download the 511VA smartphone app, or dial 511. Bridges & Tunnels: Hampton Roads Bridge-Tunnel, I-64: Single-lane closures westbound on: March 26 from 9 p.m. to 7 am. March 27 from 10 p.m. to 9 a.m. Monitor-Merrimac Memorial Bridge-Tunnel, I-664: Alternating, single-lane closures northbound on March 21-25 from as early as 8 p.m. to 5 a.m. Mobile, single-lane closures northbound on March 23 from 9 a.m. to 2 p.m. High Rise Bridge, I-64: Alternating, mobile, double-lane closures in both directions on March 22-25 from 9 p.m. to 5 a.m. Berkeley Bridge, I-264: Single-lane closure westbound on March 25 from 7 p.m. to midnight. James River Bridge, Route 17: Alternating, mobile, singe-lane closures in both directions on March 22 from 9 a.m. to 3 p.m. Alternating, mobile, singe-lane closures southbound March 23 from 9 a.m. to 3 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Elizabeth River Crossings Study
    EElizabethlizabeth RivRiverer CCrrossingsossings SStudytudy T08-07 June 2008 HAMPTON ROADS METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION Chesapeake Poquoson * Clifton E. Hayes, Jr. * Charles W. Burgess, Jr. Gloucester County Portsmouth * Lane B. Ramsey * Douglas L. Smith Hampton Suffolk * Randall A. Gilliland * Selena Cuffee-Glenn Isle Of Wight County Virginia Beach * Stan D. Clark * Louis R. Jones James City County Williamsburg * Bruce C. Goodson * Jackson C. Tuttle, Ii Newport News York County * Joe S. Frank * James O. McReynolds Norfolk * Paul D. Fraim Hampton Roads Planning District Commission * Dwight L. Farmer, Executive Director/Secretary Transportation District Commission Of Hampton Roads * Michael S. Townes, President/Chief Executive Officer Virginia Department Of Transportation * Dennis W. Heuer, District Administrator - Hampton Roads District Williamsburg Area Transport * Mark D. Rickards, Executive Director Federal Highway Administration Robert Fonseca-Martinez, Division Administrator - Virginia Division Federal Transit Administration Letitia A. Thompson, Regional Administrator, Region 3 Federal Aviation Administration Terry Page, Manager, Washington Airports District Office Virginia Department Of Aviation Randall P. Burdette, Director Virginia Port Authority Jerry A. Bridges, Executive Director *Voting Member PROJECT STAFF Dwight L. Farmer Executive Director/Secretary Camelia Ravanbakht HRMPO Deputy Executive Director Robert B. Case Principal Transportation Engineer Andy C. Pickard Senior Transportation Engineer Marla K. Frye Administrative
    [Show full text]
  • Sale Brochure
    INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY FOR SALE 102 S. WITCHDUCK ROAD VIRGINIA BEACH, VA 23462 DIVARIS REAL ESTATE INC // 4525 MAIN STREET, SUITE 900, VIRGINIA BEACH, VA 23462 // DIVARIS.COM 102 S. WITCHDUCK ROAD VIRGINIA BEACH, VA 23462 PROPERTY SUMMARY PROPERTY DESCRIPTION OFFERING SUMMARY This strategically located 2.45-acre property, at the Witchduck Sale Price: Subject To Offer Road intersection with Interstate 264 in central Virginia Beach, is at the center of a rapidly improving, urbanized corridor. Two Building Size: 22,180 SF new multi-family residential developments, a widening of Witchduck Road with a host of infrastructure improvements, DEMOGRAPHICS 1 MILE 3 MILES 5 MILES and Interstate 64 expansion and flyover, all greatly enhance this prime redevelopment opportunity. Total Households 5,032 44,340 113,363 Total Population 12,784 112,885 299,522 PROPERTY HIGHLIGHTS Average HH Income $62,346 $70,183 $72,030 • 53,000 vehicles per day, growing to 64,000 soon • Immediate access to I-264 • 2.45 acres • Zoned I-2 • 22,180 sf warehouse, with 2 grade-level doors • Road widening to six (6) lanes underway. DIVARIS REAL ESTATE INC // 4525 MAIN STREET, SUITE 900, VIRGINIA BEACH, VA 23462 // DIVARIS.COM PROPERTY SUMMARY // 2 DAVE REDMOND 757.333.4310 [email protected] 102 S. WITCHDUCK ROAD VIRGINIA BEACH, VA 23462 THE WITCHDUCK ROAD RENAISSANCE THE WITCHDUCK ROAD RENAISSANCE This prime redevelopment opportunity, immediately accessible to I-264 and the entire Hampton Roads region, sits at the center of a rapidly growing and improving corridor. The subject property faces Witchduck Road, a major urban arterial in north central Virginia Beach’s Bayside District, one of the most densely populated areas of the city.
    [Show full text]
  • South Norfolk Jordan Bridge (“SNJB”) Is a 5,372 Ft Fixed Bridge That Connects the City of Chesapeake to the City of Portsmouth Over the Elizabeth River In
    TOLL REVENUE NEW BUILD / REPLACEMENT SOUTH NORFOLK PRIVATIZATION PRIVATE FINANCING UNSOLICITED BID JORDAN BRIDGE CHESAPEAKE, VA The South Norfolk Jordan Bridge (“SNJB”) is a 5,372 ft fixed bridge that connects the City of Chesapeake to the City of Portsmouth over the Elizabeth River in Virginia. The City of Chesapeake had decommissioned the original Jordan Bridge in November 2008. An unsolicited proposal submitted by United Bridge Partners (“UBP”) to replace the Jordan Bridge with a new, privately owned bridge was approved by the City of Chesapeake in January 20091 by executing an Acquisition and Development Agreement (“ADA”) between UBP and the City of Chesapeake. As part of the ADA, UBP assumed responsibility to demolish the existing Jordan Bridge, aquired the right of way and easments associated with the bridge, and the right to toll, design, construct, finance, operate and assume ownership of a new bridge and associated tolling facilities on the SNJB. The construction of the SNJB was reported to be privately financed. Project revenue on the SNJB comes from tolls, set by the private operator with no defined limit, which are collected electronically on the bridge2. Note: the facts of this case study were reviewed by UBP. We have provided Chesapeake footnotes to describe instances where UBP disputes information in the public domain. BACKGROUND + PROJECT DRIVERS The Elizabeth River Corridor between Midtown Tunnel and High Rise Bridge in southern eastern Virginia near the Chesapeake Bay serves approximately 250,000 Figure 1: Elizabeth River Crossings. vehicle trip crossings per weekday. It is a growing corridor that primarily serves Source: Pickard, A.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Virginia Beach Comprehensive Plan – It's Our Future: a Choice City
    City of Virginia Beach Comprehensive Plan – It’s Our Future: A Choice City November 20, 2018 1.3 - SUBURBAN AREA INTRODUCTION Much of the area located north of the Green Line possesses a suburban land use pattern, meaning the area primarily consists of low- to medium-density residential land use with commercial retail, office, and service uses interspersed throughout the area. This land use pattern is the result of more than a century of the development of communities created by subdividing all or portions of the farms that defined Princess Anne County (now the City of Virginia Beach) since the 17th century. The earliest subdivisions were established in the late-19th and early-20th centuries, located adjacent to the railroad line that connected the City of Norfolk to the Town of Virginia Beach. Since the automobile was largely a novelty during these years, movement outside of the urban core cities of Norfolk and Portsmouth was either via the railroad or a poorly maintained roadway system using horse and wagon. The railroad line offered developers the opportunity to establish communities outside the urban core of Norfolk for those who desired to choose a lifestyle less intense than that of Norfolk. This trend of creating communities outside the urban core cities occurred not only here, but throughout the United States, and England as well. Eventually, the area outside the core urban cities was designated as being ‘suburban.’ Vestiges of the early suburban communities in Virginia Beach can be seen in the existing street layout of Pembroke, south of Virginia Beach Boulevard, which were established as Euclid Place (1910) and Sunny Brook (1916).
    [Show full text]
  • Construction Projects in Virginia Beach
    Hampton Roads 2034 Long-Range Transportation Plan TTRANSPORTATIONRANSPORTATION PPROJECTROJECT PPRIORITIESRIORITIES ProjectProject InformationInformation GuideGuide TPO TTPORANSPORTATION PLANNING ORGANIZATION T 11-01 June 2011 HAMPTON ROADS TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ORGANIZATION Dwight L. Farmer Executive Director/Secretary VOTING MEMBERS: CHESAPEAKE JAMES CITY COUNTY PORTSMOUTH Alan P. Krasnoff Bruce C. Goodson Kenneth I. Wright GLOUCESTER COUNTY NEWPORT NEWS SUFFOLK Christian D. Rilee McKinley Price Linda T. Johnson HAMPTON NORFOLK VIRGINIA BEACH Molly J. Ward Paul D. Fraim William D. Sessoms, Jr. ISLE OF WIGHT COUNTY POQUOSON WILLIAMSBURG Stan D. Clark W. Eugene Hunt, Jr. Clyde Haulman YORK COUNTY Thomas G. Shepperd, Jr. MEMBERS OF THE VIRGINIA SENATE The Honorable John C. Miller The Honorable Yvonne B. Miller MEMBERS OF THE VIRGINIA HOUSE OF DELEGATES The Honorable G. Glenn Oder The Honorable John A. Cosgrove TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT COMMISSION OF HAMPTON ROADS Philip A. Shucet, President/Chief Executive Officer WILLIAMSBURG AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY Mark D. Rickards, Executive Director VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Dennis W. Heuer, District Administrator – Hampton Roads District VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF RAIL AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION Amy Inman, Manager of Transit Planning VIRGINIA PORT AUTHORITY Jerry A. Bridges, Executive Director HAMPTON ROADS TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ORGANIZATION NON-VOTING MEMBERS: CHESAPEAKE ISLE OF WIGHT COUNTY NORFOLK SUFFOLK William E. Harrell W. Douglas Caskey Marcus Jones Selena Cuffee-Glenn GLOUCESTER COUNTY JAMES CITY COUNTY POQUOSON VIRGINIA BEACH Brenda G. Garton Robert C. Middaugh J. Randall Wheeler James K. Spore HAMPTON NEWPORT NEWS PORTSMOUTH WILLIAMSBURG Mary Bunting Neil A. Morgan Kenneth L. Chandler Jackson C. Tuttle YORK COUNTY James O. McReynolds FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION Irene Rico, Division Administrator – Virginia Division Letitia A.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigation of Breeding Peregrine Falcons on Bridges
    INVESTIGATION OF BREEDING PEREGRINE FALCONS ON BRIDGES THE CENTER FOR CONSERVATION BIOLOGY COLLEGE OF WILLIAM AND MARY VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY Investigation of breeding peregrine falcons on bridges Bryan D. Watts, PhD Marian U. Watts The Center for Conservation Biology College of William and Mary & Virginia Commonwealth University Recommended Citation: Watts, B. D. and M. U. Watts. 2017. Investigation of breeding peregrine falcons on bridges. The Center for Conservation Biology. Technical Report Series, CCBTR-17-01. College of William and Mary & Virginia Commonwealth University, Williamsburg, VA. 38 pp. Project Partners: Virginia Department of Transportation Virginia Transportation Research Council Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Dominion Power College of William and Mary Virginia Commonwealth University The Center for Conservation Biology Front Cover: Female peregrine falcon with eggs in nest box on the James River Bridge. Photo by Bryan Watts. The Center for Conservation Biology is an organization dedicated to discovering innovative solutions to environmental problems that are both scientifically sound and practical within today’s social context. Our philosophy has been to use a general systems approach to locate critical information needs and to plot a deliberate course of action to reach what we believe are essential information endpoints. Table of Contents Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ___________________________________________________________________________________ 3 BACKGROUND
    [Show full text]
  • Hampton Roads Long‐Range Transportation Plan: List of Projects
    Hampton Roads Long‐Range Transportation Plan: List of Projects Approved and Adopted July 21, 2016 Updated October 18 , 2018 REGIONAL PRIORITY PROJECTS The following section contains the HRTPO Board Approved project sequencing of the Regional Priority Projects based on project readiness for inclusion in the 2040 Long‐Range Transportation Plan. Planned funding sources for these projects include: the Hampton Roads Transportation Fund (HRTF), HRTAC/HRTF Bonds, HRTAC Toll Revenues, and SMART SCALE (formerly House Bill 2) High‐Priority Projects Program forecasted revenues between 2016‐2040. 1 Sequencing Based on Project Readiness • I-64 Peninsula Widening I • I-64/I-264 Interchange II • I-64 Southside Widening/High-Rise Bridge - Phase 1 III • I-64/Hampton Roads Bridge Tunnel Widening • I-64 Southside Widening/High-Rise Bridge - Phase 2 IV • Bowers Hill Interchange • I-64/Fort Eustis Blvd Interchange V • US Route 460/58/13 Connector Approved by the HRTPO Board at its February 18, 2016 Meeting. 2 Estimated Estimated Group Project YOE* Cost Opening Year I-64 Peninsula Widening Segment 1 $123 Million 2017 Segment 2 $190 Million 2019 Segment 3 $311 Million 2022 I I-64/I-264 (including Witchduck Rd Interchange) Phase 1 $157 Million 2019 Phase 2 $190 Million 2021 Phase 3 Study $10 Million 2018 I-64 Southside Widening (including High Rise Bridge) II Phase 1 $600 Million 2021 Hampton Roads Crossing $3 Million Regional Connectors Study 2020 III (+ $4 Million Contingency) I-64/Hampton Roads Bridge-Tunnel Widening $3.8 Billion 2024 I-64 Southside Widening
    [Show full text]
  • Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences
    Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement Chapter 3: Affected Environment & Environmental Consequences 3.15 INDIRECT AND CUMULATIVE IMPACTS 3.15.1 Regulatory Context and Methodology NEPA legislation does not mention indirect or cumulative impacts; however, the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) regulations for implementing NEPA address federal agency responsibilities applicable to indirect and cumulative considerations, analysis, and documentation requirements (40 CFR 1508.25) for the environmental consequences section of an EIS (40 CFR 1502.16) (FHWA, 2014). In addition to CEQ’s regulations, indirect and cumulative effects assessment is conducted in accordance with the requirements and processes outlined in 23 CFR Part 771, FHWA Interim Guidance: Indirect and Cumulative Impacts in NEPA (2003), FHWA Position Paper on Secondary and Cumulative Impact Assessment (1992), FHWA’s Questions and Answers on Considering Indirect and Cumulative Impacts in the NEPA Process (2015), the Transportation Research Board’s (TRB) National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 466: Desk Reference for Estimating the Indirect Effect of Proposed Transportation Projects (TRB, 2002), NCHRP Project 25-25 Task 22: Land Use Forecasting for Indirect Impacts Analysis (TRB, 2005), NCHRP Project 25-25 Task 11: Secondary/Indirect and Cumulative Effects Analysis (TRB, 2006), as well as CEQ’s Considering Cumulative Effects under the National Environmental Policy Act (1997) and Guidance on the Consideration of Past Actions in Cumulative Effects Analysis (2005). CEQ defines indirect effects as “…effects which are caused by the action and are later in time or farther removed in distance, but are still reasonably foreseeable (40 CFR 1508.8[b]). Indirect effects may include growth-inducing effects and other effects related to induced changes in the pattern of land use, population density or growth rate, and related effects on air and water and other natural systems, including ecosystems” (40 CFR 1508.8[b]).
    [Show full text]
  • Comprehensive Review of Special Structures
    COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW SPECIAL STRUCTURES Stephen C. Brich, P.E., Commissioner of Highways November 20th, 2019 Special Structures - Introduction 2018 Report to General Assembly Robert O. Norris Bridge 2019 Developed a Statewide, Systematic Long-Term Plan • Looks ahead 50 years and includes operations . Critical to ensuring mobility • Based on consistent classification and life-cycle approach • Based on several workshops (Districts/ Facility Managers/ Central Office) • Will be a living document that will be maintained and updated annually • Presented today to inform you of important economic and budget considerations Virginia Department of Transportation 3 Special Structures – Inventory • Risk/Complexity • Maintenance Cost Defined By: • Importance Long Detours, High Traffic, Economic Significance (Shipping and Vehicular), Access to Vital Facilities (Military and Ports) Virginia Department of Transportation 4 Special Structures – Original Build George P. Coleman Memorial Bridge Berkley Bridge Hampton Roads Bridge-Tunnel Virginia Department of Transportation 5 Special Structures – Current State Managed by Public Private Partnership . Pocahontas Parkway (Rt 895): through 2105 . Elizabeth River Tunnel (Midtown): through 2069 . Elizabeth River Tunnel (Downtown): through 2069 • Required funding not included in plan • VDOT responsible for the facility costs (e.g. maintenance, operations and replacement) once the concession agreement ends Hampton Roads Bridge-Tunnel Project . HRBT Approaches . I-64 over Willoughby • Existing tunnel - not included
    [Show full text]
  • Hampton Roads Regional Bridge Study
    HamptonHampton RRoadsoads RRegionalegional BridgeBridge StudStudyy 20122012 UpdUpdaatete the heartbeat of H MPTON RO DS T P O November 2012 T12-14 HAMPTON ROADS TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ORGANIZATION Dwight L. Farmer Executive Director/Secretary VOTING MEMBERS: CHESAPEAKE JAMES CITY COUNTY PORTSMOUTH Alan P. Krasnoff Mary K. Jones Kenneth I. Wright GLOUCESTER COUNTY NEWPORT NEWS SUFFOLK Christopher A. Hutson McKinley Price Linda T. Johnson HAMPTON NORFOLK VIRGINIA BEACH Molly J. Ward Paul D. Fraim William D. Sessoms, Jr. ISLE OF WIGHT COUNTY POQUOSON WILLIAMSBURG Delores Dee-Dee Darden W. Eugene Hunt, Jr. Clyde Haulman YORK COUNTY Thomas G. Shepperd, Jr. MEMBERS OF THE VIRGINIA SENATE The Honorable Thomas K. Norment, Jr. The Honorable Frank W. Wagner MEMBERS OF THE VIRGINIA HOUSE OF DELEGATES The Honorable John A. Cosgrove The Honorable Christopher P. Stolle TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT COMMISSION OF HAMPTON ROADS William E. Harrell, President/Chief Executive Officer WILLIAMSBURG AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY Kevan Danker, Executive Director VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Dennis W. Heuer, District Administrator – Hampton Roads District VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF RAIL AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION Thelma Drake, Director VIRGINIA PORT AUTHORITY Vacant HAMPTON ROADS TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ORGANIZATION NON-VOTING MEMBERS: CHESAPEAKE ISLE OF WIGHT COUNTY NORFOLK SUFFOLK WILLIAMSBURG Amar Dwarkanath W. Douglas Caskey Marcus Jones Selena Cuffee-Glenn Jackson C. Tuttle GLOUCESTER COUNTY JAMES CITY COUNTY POQUOSON VIRGINIA BEACH YORK COUNTY Brenda G. Garton Robert C. Middaugh J. Randall Wheeler James K. Spore James O. McReynolds HAMPTON NEWPORT NEWS PORTSMOUTH Mary Bunting Neil A. Morgan Brannon Godfrey FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION Irene Rico, Division Administrator, Virginia Division Brigid Hynes-Cherin, Acting Regional Administrator, Region 3 FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF AVIATION Jeffrey W.
    [Show full text]
  • C-5 Conditional Use Permits
    THE CITY OF NORFOLK To the Honorable Council November 6, 2018 City of Norfolk, Virginia From: Leonard M. Newcomb III, CFM, Acting Planning Director Subject: Norview Realty, LLC, for the following Conditional Use Permits at 3542 N. Military Highwpti---- a. .6 tomobile sales b. Automobile repair and maintenance, major Reviewed: Ward/Superward: 4/7 W -f Deputy City Manager Approved: Item Number: C-5 Douglasli. S ith, City Manager I. Staff Recommendation: Approval. II. Planning Commission Recommendation: By a vote of 5 to 0, the Planning Commission recommends Approval. III. Request: Conditional Use Permits: a. Automobile sales b. Automobile repair and maintenance, major IV. Applicant: Norview Realty, LLC V. Description: • The property is located on the east side of N. Military Highway north of the intersection with Azalea Garden Road. • This request would allow an automobile sales and repair business to operate from the site, which was formerly developed as a Wendy's fast food restaurant. • The proposed hours of operation are from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., seven days a week. • One of the two existing driveways accessing N. Military Highway will be removed and replaced with curb, gutter, sidewalks, and landscaping. • As part of the conditions of the Conditional Use Permit, a sidewalk will be required along the N. Military Highway frontage. • As a new development, it will have to complete the Site Plan Review Process with all the standards set forth in the Zoning Ordinance. 810 UNION STREET, SUITE 1101 8 NORFOLK VIRGINIA 23510 ii 757-664-4242 www.norfokgov VI. Historic Resources Impacts: N/A VII.
    [Show full text]