Women's Pension Rights and Survivors' Benefits

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Women's Pension Rights and Survivors' Benefits European Network of Economic Policy Research Institutes WOMEN’S PENSION RIGHTS AND SURVIVORS’ BENEFITS A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF EU MEMBER STATES AND CANDIDATE COUNTRIES CHIARA MONTICONE, ANNA RUZIK AND JUSTYNA SKIBA ENEPRI RESEARCH REPORT NO. 53 AIM WP6, TASK 6.4.3 APRIL 2008 ENEPRI Research Reports publish the original research results of projects undertaken in the context of an ENEPRI project. This paper was prepared as part of the Adequacy of Old-Age Income Maintenance in the EU (AIM) project – which has received financing from the European Commission under the 6th Research Framework Programme (contract no. SP21-CT-2005-513748). The views expressed are attributable only to the authors and not to any institution with which they are associated. ISBN 978-92-9079-787-6 Available for free downloading from the ENEPRI website (http://www.enepri.org) or the CEPS website (www.ceps.eu) © Copyright 2008, Chiara Monticone, Anna Ruzik & Justyna Skiba WOMEN’S PENSION RIGHTS AND SURVIVORS’ BENEFITS A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF EU MEMBER STATES AND CANDIDATE COUNTRIES ENEPRI Research Report No. 53/April 2008 Chiara Monticone, Anna Ruzik and Justyna Skiba∗ Abstract his report presents and compares old-age income provision rules with respect to the issue of equality between women and men in the current and future EU member states. The Treport focuses on 25 member states and, to the extent possible, on the recently acceded and candidate countries (Romania, Bulgaria, Turkey and Croatia). The report considers various aspects of the benefits, ranging from entitlement rules to minimum pensions, through to childcare credits and assistance for survivors. Overall, European countries adopt similar measures for ensuring adequate old-age income for women. The elimination of differentiated entitlement rules for standard and early retirement plays a key role in the reduction of the differences between men and women. In particular, this process means a faster increase in the minimum retirement age for women and different methods of encompassing childcare periods in the pension benefit formulas. In the long run, the higher employment rates of women and reduced wage disparities between men and women should lead to better individual pension rights for women, especially in defined contribution schemes, which have recently been introduced in some countries. ∗ Chiara Monticone is a Researcher at the Centre for Research on Pensions and Welfare Policies (CeRP) in Moncalieri (Turin). Anna Ruzik, PhD, is an economist and a Researcher at the Centre for Social and Economic Research (CASE) in Warsaw. Justyna Skiba was a Research Assistant at CASE, in Warsaw. Contents 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 1 2. Types of old-age pension systems...................................................................................... 1 3. Eligibility rules for men and women................................................................................. 2 3.1 Retirement age............................................................................................................. 2 3.2 Contributory periods and residence ............................................................................. 3 3.3 Early retirement ........................................................................................................... 3 4. Minimum pensions ............................................................................................................. 4 5. Annuitisation and mortality tables ................................................................................... 5 6. Pension rights for carers .................................................................................................... 5 6.1 Maternity...................................................................................................................... 6 6.2 Childcare...................................................................................................................... 6 6.3 Care of disabled and ill dependants ............................................................................. 7 7. Survivors’ benefits.............................................................................................................. 8 7.1 Entitled persons............................................................................................................8 7.2 Entitlement rules.......................................................................................................... 8 7.3 Benefit levels ............................................................................................................... 9 7.4 Recent changes regulations for survivors’ benefits ..................................................... 9 8. Other derived rights and entitlements............................................................................ 10 9. Summary and conclusions ............................................................................................... 10 References .................................................................................................................................. 12 Appendix. Comparative Tables of EU Countries................................................................... 13 Table A1. Basic elements of the pension system .............................................................. 13 Table A2. Eligibility rules by gender for standard retirement........................................... 30 Table A3. Eligibility rules by gender for early retirement ................................................ 41 Table A4. Minimum pension entitlement rules and benefits............................................. 51 Table A5. Annuitisation/mortality tables (where applicable) ........................................... 58 Table A6. Contribution equivalents for carers .................................................................. 60 Table A7. Survivors’ benefits for spouses......................................................................... 71 Table A8. Other derived rights and entitlements............................................................... 96 Table A9. Pension and benefit reforms ........................................................................... 102 WOMEN’S PENSION RIGHTS AND SURVIVORS’ BENEFITS A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF EU MEMBER STATES AND CANDIDATE COUNTRIES ENEPRI Research Report No. 53/April 2008 Chiara Monticone, Anna Ruzik and Justyna Skiba 1. Introduction The aim of this report is to present and compare old-age income provision rules that are relevant for the issue of equality between women and men in the current and future EU member states. The report focuses on 25 member states and, to the extent possible, on the recently acceded and candidate countries (Romania, Bulgaria, Turkey and Croatia). Owing to the common features of certain types of pension systems, on some matters the analysis divides the member states into two groups: the 15 ‘old’ member states and the 10 new member states that joined the EU on 1 May 2004. Until the late 1980s and early 1990s, many of the new member states and candidate countries (with the exception of Malta and Cyprus, but including Romania, Bulgaria and Croatia) had a centrally planned economy, dominated by state ownership of industry and services, and mainly state-owned agriculture. Since then, Central and Eastern Europe has been experiencing a transition towards a free market economy. Another relevant difference between the EU-10 and the EU-15 has been the higher labour force participation rates of women of prime working age in the new member states. The higher rates stem partly from the fact that the socialist system promoted full gender equality in labour market activity among other areas, and partly from the common need for two earners in order to provide enough income for a family household. From the start of the transition, however, employment rates – especially at older ages – have decreased. This report considers various elements of women’s pension and survivors’ benefits, from entitlement rules to minimum pensions, and from childcare credits to survivors’ benefits. The short descriptions given in the subsequent sections are complemented by detailed tables in the appendix. 2. Types of old-age pension systems An overview of the countries studied shows a variety of pension systems. Most of these systems cover employees as well as the self-employed and some inactive persons (European Commission, 2006). Among the EU-15 public systems, the pay-as-you-go (PAYG) structure prevails as a funding principle (Table A1). In the majority of countries, a defined benefit formula is used, whereas in Italy and Sweden, notional defined-contribution (NDC) accounts have recently been introduced. In Denmark, Finland, the Netherlands and Sweden, flat-rate benefits are paid based on the length of residence in the country, complemented by an earnings-related or occupational element. In the UK and Ireland, pension benefits are characterised by a public flat-rate component and a component | 1 2 | MONTICONE, RUZIK & SKIBA coming from fully funded schemes (publicly or privately managed), which represents a substantial share of retirement income. The majority of Central and Eastern European countries have introduced a three-pillar system as defined by the World Bank (World Bank, 1994). According to the World Bank, the first pillar is mandatory, managed by the state and based on the PAYG principle. It
Recommended publications
  • Report 2018 Pension Adequacy
    PENSION ADEQUACY REPORT 2018 CURRENT AND FUTURE INCOME ADEQUACY IN OLD AGE IN THE EU VOLUME 1 European Commission Directorate-General for Employement, Social Affairs and Inclusion 1049 Brussels BELGIUM Manuscript completed in 2018 Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission is responsible for the use that might be made of the following information. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2018 © European Union, 2018 Reuse is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. The reuse policy of European Commission documents is regulated by Decision 2011/833/EU (OJ L 330, 14.12.2011, p. 39). For any use or reproduction of photos or other material that is not under the EU copyright, permission must be sought directly from the copyright holders. Cover photo: ©Shutterstock PDF ISBN 978-92-79-85657-0 doi:10.2767/406275 KE-01-18-457-EN-N European Commission Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion Social Protection Committee The 2018 Pension Adequacy Report: current and future income adequacy in old age in the EU Volume I Joint Report prepared by the Social Protection Committee (SPC) and the European Commission (DG EMPL) 2018 Acknowledgements The 2018 Pension Adequacy Report (PAR) has been prepared by the Directorate General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion of the European Commission (Unit C2 ‘Modernisation of social protection systems’, headed by Radek Malý (until 31 December 2016) and Ana Carla Pereira), in collaboration with the Social Protection Committee (SPC, chaired by Ulrika Hall) and its Working Group on Ageing Issues (SPC WG-AGE, chaired by Andraž Rangus) and the Indicators Sub-group (chaired by Rudi Van Dam, with Volker Schmitt chairing the discussions on the PAR).
    [Show full text]
  • What Is the Cost of Total Pension Provision and Who Pays the Bill? Cross-National Comparison of Pension Contributions
    Kokonaiseläke 2016 Kokonaiseläke FINNISH CENTRE FOR PENSIONS, 09 REPORTS 2016 Katsaus työeläkkeen, kansaneläkkeen ja verotuksen määräytymiseen ja verotuksen kansaneläkkeen työeläkkeen, Katsaus What is the cost of total pension provision and who pays the bill? Cross-national comparison of pension contributions MIKA VIDLUND MARJA KIVINIEMI ANTTI MIELONEN NIKO VÄÄNÄNEN FINNISH CENTRE FOR PENSIONS, 09 REPORTS 2016 What is the cost of total pension provision and who pays the bill? Cross-national comparison of pension contributions MIKA VIDLUND MARJA KIVINIEMI ANTTI MIELONEN NIKO VÄÄNÄNEN Finnish Centre for Pensions FI-00065 ELÄKETURVAKESKUS, FINLAND Telephone +358 29 411 20 E-mail: [email protected] Eläketurvakeskus 00065 ELÄKETURVAKESKUS Puhelin: 029 411 20 Sähköposti: [email protected] Pensionsskyddscentralen 00065 PENSIONSSKYDDSCENTRALEN Telefon: 029 411 20 E-post: fö[email protected] Juvenes Print – Suomen Yliopistopaino Oy Helsinki 2016 ISBN 978-951-691-253-3 (s-b) ISBN 978-951-691-254-0 (PDF) ISSN 1238-5948 (printed) ISSN 1798-7490 (online) Subscribe to our Newsletter (at http://www.etk.fi/en/newsletter/) that present highlights of Finnish pensions and make international comparisons. FOREWORD This report provides new and comprehensive information on pension contribution levels in different European countries. The report is an updated and extended version of previous comparisons published in 2003 and 2008. The comparison is based on country data compiled by the writers of this report. We wish to express our thanks for
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring the Role of ICT- Enabled Social Innovation to Support The
    Exploring the role of ICT- Enabled Social Innovation to support the modernisation of EU Social Protection Systems Findings and insights from analysis of case studies in fourteen Member States Gianluca Misuraca, Giulio Pasi, Fabienne Abadie, Csaba Kucsera and Marco Virginillo 2017 EUR 28570 EN This publication is a Science for Policy report by the Joint Research Centre (JRC), the European Commission’s science and knowledge service. It aims to provide evidence-based scientific support to the European policymaking process. The scientific output expressed does not imply a policy position of the European Commission. Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission is responsible for the use that might be made of this publication. Contact information: Gianluca Misuraca, Senior Scientist, IESI Project Leader European Commission's Joint Research Centre, Directorate for Growth & Innovation, Seville, Spain Email: [email protected] JRC Science Hub https://ec.europa.eu/jrc JRC106484 EUR 28570 EN PDF ISBN 978-92-79-68102-8 ISSN 1831-9424 doi:10.2760/256658 Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2017 © European Union, 2017 The reuse of the document is authorised, provided the source is acknowledged and the original meaning or message of the texts are not distorted. The European Commission shall not be held liable for any consequences stemming from the reuse. How to cite this report: Misuraca, G., Pasi, G., Abadie, F., Kucsera, C., Virginillo, M., (2017) 'Exploring the role of ICT-Enabled
    [Show full text]
  • Youth Unemployment, Ageing and Regional Welfare: the Regional Labour Market Policy Response to Ageing in Sweden
    EUROPEAN SPATIAL RESEARCH AND POLICY Volume 19 2012 Number 1 https://doi.org/10.2478/v10105-012-0009-4 Daniel RAUHUT*, Petri KAHILA** YOUTH UNEMPLOYMENT, AGEING AND REGIONAL WELFARE: THE REGIONAL LABOUR MARKET POLICY RESPONSE TO AGEING IN SWEDEN Abstract: TheThe aimaim of of this this paper paper is tois discussto discuss the regionalthe regional labour labour market market policy policyresponse response to demo- to graphicdemographic ageing ageing in Sweden in Sweden and its consequences and its consequences on the labour on supply the labour of young supply adults of�young regions adults. with ageingRegions problems with ageing already problems experience already significant experience problems significant at the problems labour market at the� The labour overall market. conclu- The sionoverall is thatconclusion labour marketis that labourpolicies market in Sweden policies addressing in Sweden the addressingconsequences the of consequences ageing fail to of include ageing youngfail to adults include and young the policies adults anddo not the address policies regional do not addressheterogeneity regional regarding heterogeneity e�g� ageing regarding and youth e.g. unemploymentageing and youth� unemployment. Key words : youth unemployment, ageing, labour market institutions, labour market policies, rural labour marketsmarkets.�12��� 1.1 INTRODUCTIONIntROdUCtIOn The future will be influenced notnot onlyonly byby demographicdemographic processes,processes, but but also also by by thethe political and and economic economic choices choices
    [Show full text]
  • Tilburg University the Move Towards Riskier Pension Products in the World's Best Pension Systems Balter, Anne; Kallestrup-Lamb
    Tilburg University The Move Towards Riskier Pension Products in the World’s Best Pension Systems Balter, Anne; Kallestrup-Lamb, Malene; Rangvid, Jesper Publication date: 2018 Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link to publication in Tilburg University Research Portal Citation for published version (APA): Balter, A., Kallestrup-Lamb, M., & Rangvid, J. (2018). The Move Towards Riskier Pension Products in the World’s Best Pension Systems. (NETSPAR Design Paper; Vol. 105). NETSPAR. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 26. sep. 2021 series The move towards riskier pension products in the world’s best pension systems Anne Balter Malene Kallestrup-Lamb Jesper Rangvid industry design paper 105 netspar DESIGN PAPERS are part of the refereed Industry Paper Series, which are refereed by the Netspar Editorial Board. Design Papers discuss the design of a component of a pension system or product.
    [Show full text]
  • Funded Pensions in Western Europe
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Ebbinghaus, Bernhard Article Varieties of Pension Governance under Pressure: Funded Pensions in Western Europe CESifo DICE Report Provided in Cooperation with: Ifo Institute – Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich Suggested Citation: Ebbinghaus, Bernhard (2012) : Varieties of Pension Governance under Pressure: Funded Pensions in Western Europe, CESifo DICE Report, ISSN 1613-6373, ifo Institut - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung an der Universität München, München, Vol. 10, Iss. 4, pp. 3-8 This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/167091 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open
    [Show full text]
  • Pensions, Purchasing- Power Risk, Inflation and Indexation
    OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers No. 77 Pensions, Purchasing- Power Risk, Inflation Edward Whitehouse and Indexation https://dx.doi.org/10.1787/227182142567 Unclassified DELSA/ELSA/WD/SEM(2009)3 Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Économiques Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 28-Jan-2009 ___________________________________________________________________________________________ English text only DIRECTORATE FOR EMPLOYMENT, LABOUR AND SOCIAL AFFAIRS EMPLOYMENT, LABOUR AND SOCIAL AFFAIRS COMMITTEE Unclassified DELSA/ELSA/WD/SEM(2009)3 OECD SOCIAL, EMPLOYMENT AND MIGRATION WORKING PAPERS NO. 77 PENSIONS, PURCHASING-POWER RISK, INFLATION AND INDEXATION Edward Whitehouse JEL Classification: D14; D37; D80; J14 All Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers are now available through OECD's Internet website at http://www.oecd.org/els English text only English JT03258853 Document complet disponible sur OLIS dans son format d'origine Complete document available on OLIS in its original format DELSA/ELSA/WD/SEM(2009)3 DIRECTORATE FOR EMPLOYMENT, LABOUR AND SOCIAL AFFAIRS http://www.oecd.org/els OECD SOCIAL, EMPLOYMENT AND MIGRATION WORKING PAPERS http://www.oecd.org/els/workingpapers This series is designed to make available to a wider readership selected labour market, social policy and migration studies prepared for use within the OECD. Authorship is usually collective, but principal writers are named. The papers are generally available only in their original language – English or French
    [Show full text]
  • Workindenmark
    WELCOME TO DENMARK 1 WELCOME TO DENMARK USEFUL INFORMATION WHICH WILL MAKE IT EASIER FOR YOU TO SETTLE INTO YOUR PROFESSIONAL AND PRIVATE LIFE IN DENMARK 2 WELCOME TO DENMARK We are pleased that you have chosen to settle in Denmark. Denmark has a lot to offer – a good work-life balance, excellent working conditions based on team- work and consensus in a flat management structure and free welfare. People living in Denmark are said to be the happiest people in the world. Moving to a new country is automatically associated with surprises – both good and bad. Many questions arise – do I need a work permit, how does my partner find a job, what about social security, registration, bank account, tax + many more questions. The purpose of this welcome brochure is to answer some of these questions and to help you get started on your new life in Denmark. If you have questions – do not hesitate to contact us. We are here to help you. Once again, Welcome – we hope you will enjoy living in Denmark. Workindenmark THE EUROPEAN UNION The European Social Fund Investing in your future Welcome to Denmark is published by Workindenmark – part of Danish Agency for Labour Market and Recruitment, Ministry of Employment, July 2020 Editor: Kirstine Lindved, Workindenmark Graphic design: Creative United Photos: Getty Images, Workindenmark, Danløn and Skattestyrelsen Print: Rosendahls A/S Welcome to Denmark 3 CONTENTS Denmark Life in Denmark Welcome to Denmark 2 Social Security and Sickness Benefits 40 Denmark – Country and People 6 Health Insurance and Sickness Benefits
    [Show full text]
  • Ageing and Health
    Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.202.226, on 25 Sep 2021 at 20:06:53, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/60051756048D9E5C1561B4F8416A3369 Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.202.226, on 25 Sep 2021 at 20:06:53, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/60051756048D9E5C1561B4F8416A3369 Ageing and Health Must ageing populations create conflict between generations and crisis for health systems? Our answer is no. The problem is not so much demographic change as the political and policy challenge of creating fair, sustainable and effective policies for people of all ages. This book, based on a large European Observatory study, uses new evidence to challenge some of the myths surrounding ageing and its effects on economies and health systems. Divisive and alarmist views of population ageing are often based on ste- reotypes and anecdotes unsupported by evidence. How we address ageing societies is a choice. Societies can choose policies that benefit people of all ages, promoting equity both within and between generations, and political coalitions can be built to support such policies. This title is available as Open Access on Cambridge Core. Scott L. Greer is Professor of Health Management and Policy, Global Public Health and Political Science at the University of Michigan and Senior Expert Advisor on Health Governance for the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies.
    [Show full text]
  • Country Document Update 2014 Pensions, Health and Long-Term
    Country Document Update 2014 Pensions, health and long-term care Denmark March 2014 Author: Jon Kvist Disclaimer: This report reflects the views of its authors and these are not necessarily those of either the European Commission or the Member States. On behalf of the European Commission DG Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion asisp country document update 2014 Denmark Table of Contents Table of Contents 1 Executive Summary ........................................................................................................... 3 2 Pensions .............................................................................................................................. 4 2.1 System description ............................................................................................................................... 4 2.1.1 Major reforms that shaped the current system ....................................................................................... 4 2.1.2 System characteristics ............................................................................................................................ 4 2.1.3 Details on recent reforms ....................................................................................................................... 7 2.2 Assessment of strengths and weaknesses ........................................................................................... 8 2.2.1 Adequacy ..............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Private Pensions: the Real Return
    Private Pensions: The Real Return A Research Report by EuroFinUse The European Federation of Financial Services Users The Real Return of Private Pensions A Research Report by EuroFinUse Authors: Jean Berthon Charles Cronin Guillaume Prache Klaus Struwe Juan Manuel Viver Contents Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 6 Country Profiles and Real Returns ............................................................................................... 7 Limitations ................................................................................................................................... 8 Return Attribution ..................................................................................................................... 12 Inflation ................................................................................................................................ 12 Asset Mix .............................................................................................................................. 14 Asset Performance 2000 to 2011 ......................................................................................... 21 Equity Markets ................................................................................................................ 22 Bond Markets .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Occupational Welfare Policies and Pension Income Inequalities: Case Studies of Pension Systems in Denmark, Finland, and the United Kingdom
    Luxembourg Income Study Working Paper Series Working Paper No. 561 Occupational Welfare Policies and Pension Income Inequalities: Case Studies of Pension Systems in Denmark, Finland, and the United Kingdom Jörg Neugschwender May 2011 Luxembourg Income Study (LIS), asbl Occupational Welfare Policies and Pension Income Inequalities: Case studies of pension systems in Denmark, Finland, and the United Kingdom Jörg Neugschwender (MZES, University of Mannheim) (Graduate School of Economic and Social Sciences, University of Mannheim) [email protected] Abstract This paper provides an overview of different approaches to old age security and their societal outcome in three advanced welfare states: Denmark, Finland, and the United Kingdom. All three countries established a public first tier minimum pension, which was also pursued in the following. Reform paths in the area of supplementary private systems show a broad variation in terms of regulation. As a result, income inequalities among the elderly could reveal specific characteristics. Data evaluations of the Luxembourg Income Study measure the outcomes of these public-private mixes among the current elderly population. Analyses by socio-demographic and socio-economic characteristics allow detailed interpretation of public and private pension income sources and income levels. Finnish providers are strongly involved in occupational pension provision, whereas public benefits decrease in importance. British retirees have mixed their provision mix strongly, but high income earners tend to maintain less of their previous income. Danish pensioners are selectively covered with private pension income, which keeps benefits of middle income pensioners rather close to the minimum pension amount – a scenario which is slightly changing since the introduction of mandatory occupational pensions in the 90s.
    [Show full text]