Clinical and Experimental Data on the Use of Laquinimod for the Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Clinical and Experimental Data on the Use of Laquinimod for the Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis Review: Clinical Trial Outcomes Clinical and experimental data on the use of laquinimod for the treatment of multiple sclerosis Clin. Invest. (2012) 2(8), 819–824 Laquinimod is a synthetic quinoline 3-carboxamide derivative with immuno- De-Hyung Lee* & Ralf A Linker modulatory properties. Treatment with laquinimod ameliorated disease Department of Neurology, University of activity in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis, a mouse model Erlangen, Schwabachanlage 6, 91054 Erlangen, for multiple sclerosis. In the past, an immunosuppressive mechanism of Germany action was initially assumed. With increasing knowledge on its effects, *Author for correspondence: Tel.: +49 9131 85 44534 the immunomodulatory and possibly also neuroprotective properties of Fax: +49 9131 85 33100 laquinimod came into the focus. Data from a Phase IIb trial in relapsing– E-mail: [email protected] remitting multiple sclerosis suggests this compound has clinical efficacy on MRI parameters of inflammation. In the recently published Phase III ALLEGRO trial, laquinimod 0.6 mg/day showed a reduction of relapse rates and even more pronounced effects on disability progression compared with placebo. Data from the additional Phase III BRAVO trial are awaited with great interest. In all published studies, laquinimod was well tolerated and no severe side effects were reported. In summary, laquinimod has the potential to add to our therapeutic armamentarium as a new oral immunomodulator in multiple sclerosis. Keywords: experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis • immunomodulation • laquinimod • multiple sclerosis • oral • roquinimex Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the CNS and is the most common cause of neurological disability in young adults. It is widely assumed that MS is an autoimmune disease where inflammatory infiltration leads to de myelination and axonal damage in the CNS [1]. A better understanding of the immuno pathological processes of the disease led to new therapeutic approaches. Although new treatment options have entered the therapeutic stage in recent years, existing therapies are only partially effective and early treatment is still crucial to limit progression of disability. Approved immunomodulatory or immunosup- pressive drugs for relapsing–remitting MS need parenteral application and include IFN b-1a (which is administered either subcutaneously [sc.] or intramuscularly [im.]), IFN b-1a and glatiramer acetate for baseline therapy (sc.), as well as mitox- antrone and natalizumab for escalation therapy (intravenous application). For over a decade, these injectable disease-modifying drugs have dominated the treat- ment of MS. Here, patient compliance is a major concern for physicians treating MS. With licensing of fingolimod – an orally available immunodulator – for the treatment of MS, a new era of therapy has been initiated. At present, more than 100 therapeutic studies in MS are ongoing and a large proportion of these include formulations that are enterally incorporated. Indeed, up to 22% of the general population suffer from a needle phobia, which may prevent self-injections as treat- ment for MS. In relapsing–remitting MS patients, rates of treatment interruption range between 6 to 13% within the first 6 months[2–5] . A long-term follow-up study over 4 years reported that up to 46% of parenteral immunomodulatory therapies 10.4155/CLI.12.66 © 2012 Future Science Ltd ISSN 2041-6792 819 Review: Clinical Trial Outcomes Lee & Linker were at least temporarily discontinued [6]. While oral minimum serum level (Cmin) and Cmax once steady compounds are not generally characterized by better state is reached. Laquinimod is metabolized by adherence rates compared with sc. and im. therapy, CYP3A4 in liver microsomes. After metabolization, many patients with a fear or weariness of injections four hydroxylated and two alkylated products are would prefer the use of oral drugs and thus in recent metabolically inactive and exuded primarily through years drug companies have increased their effort to the urine. Less than 5% of laquinimod is eliminated design new orally available compounds. unchanged in urine and faces. Strong specific inhib- With increasing knowledge on the cellular and itors of CYP3A4 enzymes such as ketoconazole and molecular pathomechanisms of MS, the focus in nutritives, such as grapefruit juice, can interfere with the development of new therapeutic compounds has the elimination of laquinimod [16]. However, laquini- shifted from unselective immunosuppression towards mod is only a low-affinity substrate of CYP3A4, which more selective, target-specific treatments[7] . There is reduces the risk of competitive inhibition of other sub- still an unmet need for new high-efficacy drugs with strates. Consequently, other CYP enzyme inhibitors good safety and tolerability profiles. Meanwhile, a including steroids and erythromycin only showed new generation of MS therapies is emerging, many inhibitory effects in vitro. In vivo, erythromycin and of which are in or have just finished Phase III trials, steroids do not reach relevant plasma concentrations including laquinimod. to induce CYP3A4 for the drug–drug interaction [15]. With the current dosing protocol of laquinimod, the Pharmacologic & pharmacokinetic properties of serum plasma level, which is necessary to competi- the compound tively inhibit another common substrate, etinyl estra- Laquinimod (internal compound abbreviation ABR- diol (an important compound in contraceptives), is 215062, correct IUPAC name: 5-chloro-N-ethyl-1,2- 30-times above the expected Cmax. dihydro-4-hydroxy-1-methyl-2-oxo-N-phenyl-3- quinolinecarboxamide) has a molecular weight of Studies on laquinimod in experimental MS 357 Da. It is a synthetic compound that was synthe- models sized at Active Biotech Research AB and licensed to Experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) TEVA Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd in 2004 as an is a rodent model that reflects many aspects of MS[17] . immuno modulatory agent for studies in the treatment This autoimmune disease can be elicited in suscepti- of relapsing–remitting MS [8]. Efficacy had already been ble mouse or rat strains by active immunization with demonstrated in many animal models of autoimmune myelin antigen or the adoptive transfer of encepha- diseases, including Guillain–Barré–Strohl syndrome, litogenic T cells and shares many histopathological rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, and clinical features with MS [18]. Primary studies in autoimmune colitis and MS [9–13]. Thus, laquinimod EAE were carried out with roquinimex (Linomide®), seems to affect crucial common inflammatory path- the historical precursor compound of laquinimod. ways in autoimmunity. The efficacy of laquinimod is Roquinimex displayed its efficacy in a series of ani- believed to be at least partially based on a shift of the mal models for different autoimmune diseases, includ- T-helper (Th) cell balance from a ‘Th1’ reaction, with ing experimental autoimmune neuritis (EAN) [19–23]. secretion of pro inflammatory cytokines (e.g., IL-2, Roquinimex treatment also resulted in an amelio- IL-6, TNF-a or IFN-g), towards a ‘Th2’ response, with rated disease course in both acute and chronic EAE an increase in regulatory cytokines (e.g., IL-4 and models in SJL mice as well as in outbred rats [24,25]. IL-10) [14]. So far, the definite mechanism of laquini- Roquinimex induced the expression of Th2 cytokines, mod contributing to these immunomodulatory effects which may play a role in modulation of T-cell autoim- is only partially elucidated. munity [13]. Moreover, roquinimex had been evaluated First studies on the pharmacokinetic characteris- in several clinical trials with relapsing–remitting and tics of laquinimod were performed in preclinical trials secondary progressive MS patients and demonstrated in rats, mice, rabbits and dogs [15]. Laquinimod is char- disease modifying effects with a reduction of MRI acterized by a high oral bioavailability, small volume activity as a primary measure of disease activity in a of distribution and low total clearance rate, and thus clinical Phase II trial [26]. However, this trial had to reaches its highest plasma concentration within 1 h be stopped due to severe side effects, including pleu- after oral administration. Laquinimod is present in ritis and adverse cardiac events, such as pericarditis the CNS at 10–13% relative to blood levels. In humans, and myocardial infarction, which even lead to some the maximum serum level (Cmax) of laquinimod is fatalities [26,27]. below 5 µM after administration of 0.05–2.4 mg of As a consequence, laquinimod was developed as the drug. Little fluctuation is observed between the a derivative of roquinimex without these severe side 820 www.future-science.com future science group Data on the use of laquinimod for the treatment of multiple sclerosis Review: Clinical Trial Outcomes effects. While laquinimod is structurally related to 2.4 mg/day, an elevation of inflammatory markers its precursor compound, it is pharmacologically and was observed in some individuals. The first proof-of- structurally distinct. Laquinimod has been shown concept study in MS patients was performed in more to inhibit acute EAE in the Lewis rat via a reduction than 20 centers in the Netherlands, Russia, Sweden of inflammatory infiltration [28]. It is also effective in and the UK. This multicenter, double-blinded, pla- murine EAE in a preventive, as well as therapeutic, cebo-controlled, parallel-group Phase II trial investi-
Recommended publications
  • Chemical Properties Biological Description Solubility
    Data Sheet (Cat.No.T4412) Roquinimex Chemical Properties CAS No.: 84088-42-6 Formula: C18H16N2O3 Molecular Weight: 308.34 Appearance: N/A Storage: 0-4℃ for short term (days to weeks), or -20℃ for long term (months). Biological Description Description Roquinimex (Linomide) is a quinoline derivative immunostimulant which increases NK cell activity and macrophage cytotoxicity; inhibits angiogenesis and reduces the secretion of TNF alpha. Targets(IC50) Others: None In vivo Prophylactic administration of DSS-treated mice with roquinimex significantly reduced clinical signs of colitis, MDS and the CH-reduction. Moreover, in roquinimex treated animals, the MPO activity was significantly reduced by more than 50% compared to DSS control mice. Notably, therapeutic administration of roquinimex in DSS-treated mice also significantly inhibited the MDS, CH-reduction and MPO activity. Linomide, a synthetic immunomodulator, at concentrations effective in vivo reduces the number of MBP-reactive TNF-alpha and increases MBP-reactive IL-10 and TGF-beta mRNA expressing MNC from MS patients' blood when analysed in vitro. Compared to dexamethasone, Linomide up-regulated levels of blood MNC expressing mRNA of TGF-beta after culture in presence of MBP Solubility Information Solubility DMSO: 83.3 mg/mL (270.17 mM) (< 1 mg/ml refers to the product slightly soluble or insoluble) Preparing Stock Solutions 1mg 5mg 10mg 1 mM 3.243 mL 16.216 mL 32.432 mL 5 mM 0.649 mL 3.243 mL 6.486 mL 10 mM 0.324 mL 1.622 mL 3.243 mL 50 mM 0.065 mL 0.324 mL 0.649 mL Please select the appropriate solvent to prepare the stock solution, according to the solubility of the product in different solvents.
    [Show full text]
  • Ozanimod for Treating Relapsing–Remitting Multiple Sclerosis [ID1294] ERG Report Copyright 2021 Queen's Printer and Controller of HMSO
    Confidential until published Fprofile REPORT REPORT ERG STA ERG STA Ozanimod for treating relapsing– remitting multiple sclerosis Confidential until published This report was commissioned by the NIHR HTA Programme as project number NIHR 17/156/08 Completed 21 January 2020 Updated 2 September 2020 CONFIDENTIAL DATA HAS BEEN REDACTED Copyright belongs to the Liverpool Reviews and Implementation Group Ozanimod for treating relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis [ID1294] ERG Report Copyright 2021 Queen's Printer and Controller of HMSO. All rights reserved. Page 1 of 98 Confidential until published Title: Ozanimod for treating relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis [ID1294] Produced by: Liverpool Reviews & Implementation Group (LRiG) Authors: Nigel Fleeman, Senior Research Fellow (Clinical Effectiveness), LRiG, University of Liverpool James Mahon, Director, Coldingham Analytical Services, Berwickshire Sarah Nevitt, Research Associate (Medical Statistician), LRiG, University of Liverpool Sophie Beale, Research Associate, LRiG, University of Liverpool Angela Boland, Director, LRiG, University of Liverpool Rui Duarte, Deputy Director, LRiG, University of Liverpool Rachel Houten, Health Economic Modeller, LRiG, University of Liverpool Joanne McEntee, Senior Medicines Information Pharmacist, North West Medicines Information Centre, Liverpool Ian Pomeroy, Honorary Lecturer, School of Medicine, University of Liverpool and Consultant Neurologist, The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool and Warrington Correspondence to: Nigel Fleeman, Research Fellow, Liverpool Reviews and Implementation Group, University of Liverpool, Whelan Building, The Quadrangle, Brownlow Hill, Liverpool L69 3GB Date completed: 21 January 2020 (Updated 2 September 2020) Source of funding: This report was commissioned by the NIHR Systematic Reviews Programme as project number 17/156/08 Acknowledgements: The authors would like to thank Siân Price, Consultant Neurologist at Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust who provided feedback on a draft version of the report.
    [Show full text]
  • Stems for Nonproprietary Drug Names
    USAN STEM LIST STEM DEFINITION EXAMPLES -abine (see -arabine, -citabine) -ac anti-inflammatory agents (acetic acid derivatives) bromfenac dexpemedolac -acetam (see -racetam) -adol or analgesics (mixed opiate receptor agonists/ tazadolene -adol- antagonists) spiradolene levonantradol -adox antibacterials (quinoline dioxide derivatives) carbadox -afenone antiarrhythmics (propafenone derivatives) alprafenone diprafenonex -afil PDE5 inhibitors tadalafil -aj- antiarrhythmics (ajmaline derivatives) lorajmine -aldrate antacid aluminum salts magaldrate -algron alpha1 - and alpha2 - adrenoreceptor agonists dabuzalgron -alol combined alpha and beta blockers labetalol medroxalol -amidis antimyloidotics tafamidis -amivir (see -vir) -ampa ionotropic non-NMDA glutamate receptors (AMPA and/or KA receptors) subgroup: -ampanel antagonists becampanel -ampator modulators forampator -anib angiogenesis inhibitors pegaptanib cediranib 1 subgroup: -siranib siRNA bevasiranib -andr- androgens nandrolone -anserin serotonin 5-HT2 receptor antagonists altanserin tropanserin adatanserin -antel anthelmintics (undefined group) carbantel subgroup: -quantel 2-deoxoparaherquamide A derivatives derquantel -antrone antineoplastics; anthraquinone derivatives pixantrone -apsel P-selectin antagonists torapsel -arabine antineoplastics (arabinofuranosyl derivatives) fazarabine fludarabine aril-, -aril, -aril- antiviral (arildone derivatives) pleconaril arildone fosarilate -arit antirheumatics (lobenzarit type) lobenzarit clobuzarit -arol anticoagulants (dicumarol type) dicumarol
    [Show full text]
  • Treatment of Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis in SJL/J Mice with a Replicative HSV-1 Vector Expressing Interleukin-5
    Gene Therapy (2011) 18, 646–655 & 2011 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved 0969-7128/11 www.nature.com/gt ORIGINAL ARTICLE Treatment of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis in SJL/J mice with a replicative HSV-1 vector expressing interleukin-5 M Nyga˚rdas1, C Aspelin1, H Paavilainen1,MRo¨ytta¨2,MWaris1 and V Hukkanen1,3 Experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) is an autoimmune inflammation of the central nervous system and is used as the experimental model of multiple sclerosis (MS). The exact mechanism behind the disease is still unknown, but interleukin (IL)-17 expressing T cells are thought to mediate the disease. Toll-like receptors (TLRs) are known to have a role in the innate immune response against pathogens, and several TLRs have also a role in the disease course of EAE. Here, we show that treatment with a herpes simplex virus type 1 vector expressing the Th2 cytokine IL-5 ameliorates EAE and decreases the numbers of infiltrating lymphocytes in the brain. The effect involves downregulation of TLR 2, 3 and 9 mRNA expression and upregulation of type I interferons (IFNs) in brains during onset of disease. The elevated expression of type I IFNs was also observed during recovery. Gene Therapy (2011) 18, 646–655; doi:10.1038/gt.2011.4; published online 17 February 2011 Keywords: experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE); Herpes simplex virus (HSV); interleukin; interferon; Toll-like receptor INTRODUCTION but helpful in understanding the role of the different cytokines. Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a demyelinating autoimmune disease of the Th2 cytokines have, for example, been used for therapy of EAE, either central nervous system (CNS), characterized by infiltration of inflam- directly administered or expressed from viral vectors.
    [Show full text]
  • COMPARISON of the WHO ATC CLASSIFICATION & Ephmra/Intellus Worldwide ANATOMICAL CLASSIFICATION
    COMPARISON OF THE WHO ATC CLASSIFICATION & EphMRA/Intellus Worldwide ANATOMICAL CLASSIFICATION: VERSION June 2019 2 Comparison of the WHO ATC Classification and EphMRA / Intellus Worldwide Anatomical Classification The following booklet is designed to improve the understanding of the two classification systems. The development of the two systems had previously taken place separately. EphMRA and WHO are now working together to ensure that there is a convergence of the 2 systems rather than a divergence. In order to better understand the two classification systems, we should pay attention to the way in which substances/products are classified. WHO mainly classifies substances according to the therapeutic or pharmaceutical aspects and in one class only (particular formulations or strengths can be given separate codes, e.g. clonidine in C02A as antihypertensive agent, N02C as anti-migraine product and S01E as ophthalmic product). EphMRA classifies products, mainly according to their indications and use. Therefore, it is possible to find the same compound in several classes, depending on the product, e.g., NAPROXEN tablets can be classified in M1A (antirheumatic), N2B (analgesic) and G2C if indicated for gynaecological conditions only. The purposes of classification are also different: The main purpose of the WHO classification is for international drug utilisation research and for adverse drug reaction monitoring. This classification is recommended by the WHO for use in international drug utilisation research. The EphMRA/Intellus Worldwide classification has a primary objective to satisfy the marketing needs of the pharmaceutical companies. Therefore, a direct comparison is sometimes difficult due to the different nature and purpose of the two systems.
    [Show full text]
  • No Improvement in MS with Ginkgo Biloba, Simvastatin
    JUNE 2011 • WWW.CLINICALNEUROLOGYNEWS.COM MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS 11 MS Oral Options Warrant Cautious Optimism BY SHERRY BOSCHERT commented after the session that with the expected ap- Both doses showed significant improvements, com- provals of several oral agents over the next few years, pared with placebo, in brain disease activity on various EXPERT ANALYSIS FROM THE ANNUAL MEETING OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF NEUROLOGY “I’m getting concerned that MRI tests, although some MRI there’s going to be a little bit of a Both teriflunomide measures of disease activity were HONOLULU – Oral therapies for relapsing-remitting free-for-all coming.” But he doses reduced the significantly better only in the multiple sclerosis that are in development have neu- added, “It’s good to have options. annualized high-dose group, compared with rologists feeling both excited and a bit apprehensive. We’re all thrilled.” relapse rate by placebo. “There are a whole slew of orals coming,” Dr. Mariko The only head-to-head com- approximately Results of the 2-year, random- Kita said in an interview at the meeting. “It’s really ex- parison of an oral therapy against 31%, compared ized, double-blind study of citing, but I think it will be challenging for the clinician” another active treatment for mul- with placebo. laquinimod that was presented because there will be inadequate guidance on which tiple sclerosis so far is a study of earlier at the meeting showed an drug or drugs to prioritize in treatment and how best fingolimod vs. interferon, he not- DR. MILLER annual relapse rate of 0.304 on to combine various therapies.
    [Show full text]
  • The Use of Stems in the Selection of International Nonproprietary Names (INN) for Pharmaceutical Substances
    WHO/PSM/QSM/2006.3 The use of stems in the selection of International Nonproprietary Names (INN) for pharmaceutical substances 2006 Programme on International Nonproprietary Names (INN) Quality Assurance and Safety: Medicines Medicines Policy and Standards The use of stems in the selection of International Nonproprietary Names (INN) for pharmaceutical substances FORMER DOCUMENT NUMBER: WHO/PHARM S/NOM 15 © World Health Organization 2006 All rights reserved. Publications of the World Health Organization can be obtained from WHO Press, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland (tel.: +41 22 791 3264; fax: +41 22 791 4857; e-mail: [email protected]). Requests for permission to reproduce or translate WHO publications – whether for sale or for noncommercial distribution – should be addressed to WHO Press, at the above address (fax: +41 22 791 4806; e-mail: [email protected]). The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the World Health Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Dotted lines on maps represent approximate border lines for which there may not yet be full agreement. The mention of specific companies or of certain manufacturers’ products does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by the World Health Organization in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. Errors and omissions excepted, the names of proprietary products are distinguished by initial capital letters.
    [Show full text]
  • Ehealth DSI [Ehdsi V2.2.2-OR] Ehealth DSI – Master Value Set
    MTC eHealth DSI [eHDSI v2.2.2-OR] eHealth DSI – Master Value Set Catalogue Responsible : eHDSI Solution Provider PublishDate : Wed Nov 08 16:16:10 CET 2017 © eHealth DSI eHDSI Solution Provider v2.2.2-OR Wed Nov 08 16:16:10 CET 2017 Page 1 of 490 MTC Table of Contents epSOSActiveIngredient 4 epSOSAdministrativeGender 148 epSOSAdverseEventType 149 epSOSAllergenNoDrugs 150 epSOSBloodGroup 155 epSOSBloodPressure 156 epSOSCodeNoMedication 157 epSOSCodeProb 158 epSOSConfidentiality 159 epSOSCountry 160 epSOSDisplayLabel 167 epSOSDocumentCode 170 epSOSDoseForm 171 epSOSHealthcareProfessionalRoles 184 epSOSIllnessesandDisorders 186 epSOSLanguage 448 epSOSMedicalDevices 458 epSOSNullFavor 461 epSOSPackage 462 © eHealth DSI eHDSI Solution Provider v2.2.2-OR Wed Nov 08 16:16:10 CET 2017 Page 2 of 490 MTC epSOSPersonalRelationship 464 epSOSPregnancyInformation 466 epSOSProcedures 467 epSOSReactionAllergy 470 epSOSResolutionOutcome 472 epSOSRoleClass 473 epSOSRouteofAdministration 474 epSOSSections 477 epSOSSeverity 478 epSOSSocialHistory 479 epSOSStatusCode 480 epSOSSubstitutionCode 481 epSOSTelecomAddress 482 epSOSTimingEvent 483 epSOSUnits 484 epSOSUnknownInformation 487 epSOSVaccine 488 © eHealth DSI eHDSI Solution Provider v2.2.2-OR Wed Nov 08 16:16:10 CET 2017 Page 3 of 490 MTC epSOSActiveIngredient epSOSActiveIngredient Value Set ID 1.3.6.1.4.1.12559.11.10.1.3.1.42.24 TRANSLATIONS Code System ID Code System Version Concept Code Description (FSN) 2.16.840.1.113883.6.73 2017-01 A ALIMENTARY TRACT AND METABOLISM 2.16.840.1.113883.6.73 2017-01
    [Show full text]
  • Neuroinflammation in Cortical and Meningeal Pathology in Multiple Sclerosis: Understanding from Animal Models
    Silva et al. Neuroimmunol Neuroinflammation 2021;8:174-84 Neuroimmunology DOI: 10.20517/2347-8659.2020.47 and Neuroinflammation Review Open Access Neuroinflammation in cortical and meningeal pathology in multiple sclerosis: understanding from animal models Berenice Anabel Silva1,2, Esteban Miglietta2, Carina Cintia Ferrari1,2 1Instituto de Medicina Traslacional e Ingeniería Biomédica (IMTIB)- CONICET, Buenos Aires C1181ACH, Argentina. 2Leloir Institute Foundation, Institute for Biochemical Investigations, IIBBA- CONICET, Patricias Argentinas 435, Buenos Aires, C1405BWE, Argentina. Correspondence to: Dr. Carina Cintia Ferrari, Instituto de Medicina Traslacional e Ingeniería Biomédica (IMTIB)- CONICET, Potosi 4240, Buenos Aires C1181ACH, Argentina. E-mail: [email protected] How to cite this article: Silva BA, Miglietta E, Ferrari CC. Neuroinflammation in cortical and meningeal pathology in multiple sclerosis: understanding from animal models. Neuroimmunol Neuroinflammation 2021;8:174-84. http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2347-8659.2020.47 Received: 19 Jun 2020 First Decision: 3 Aug 2020 Revised: 6 Sep 2020 Accepted: 16 Sep 2020 Available online: 21 Sep 2021 Academic Editor: Roberta Magliozzi Copy Editor: Cai-Hong Wang Production Editor: Jing Yu Abstract Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a neurodegenerative and inflammatory disease usually presenting with acute demyelinating events that can start as, or progress to, chronic damage. The development of animal experimental models, specific for each stage of MS will aid in the design of new drugs specific for the different forms of the disease. Animal models of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis successfully reflect the pathophysiological mechanisms of the early phases of MS. However, few models resemble the features of the progressive forms of MS such as cortical demyelination and meningeal inflammation.
    [Show full text]
  • WO 2013/138665 Al 19 September 2013 (19.09.2013) P O P C T
    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization I International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date WO 2013/138665 Al 19 September 2013 (19.09.2013) P O P C T (51) International Patent Classification: (81) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every C07C 279/04 (2006.01) A61P 35/00 (2006.01) kind of national protection available): AE, AG, AL, AM, A61K 31/155 (2006.01) AO, AT, AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG, BH, BN, BR, BW, BY, BZ, CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DK, DM, (21) International Application Number: DO, DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, PCT/US2013/031733 HN, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IS, JP, KE, KG, KM, KN, KP, (22) International Filing Date: KR, KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LT, LU, LY, MA, MD, 14 March 2013 (14.03.2013) ME, MG, MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, NO, NZ, OM, PA, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, QA, RO, RS, RU, (25) Filing Language: English RW, SC, SD, SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TH, TJ, (26) Publication Language: English TM, TN, TR, TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM, ZW. (30) Priority Data: 61/61 1,967 16 March 2012 (16.03.2012) US (84) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every kind of regional protection available): ARIPO (BW, GH, (71) Applicant: SANFORD-BURNHAM MEDICAL RE¬ GM, KE, LR, LS, MW, MZ, NA, RW, SD, SL, SZ, TZ, SEARCH INSTITUTE [US/US]; 10901 North Torrey UG, ZM, ZW), Eurasian (AM, AZ, BY, KG, KZ, RU, TJ, Pines Road, La Jaolla, CA 92037 (US).
    [Show full text]
  • Pharmaceutical Appendix to the Tariff Schedule 2
    Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (2007) (Rev. 2) Annotated for Statistical Reporting Purposes PHARMACEUTICAL APPENDIX TO THE HARMONIZED TARIFF SCHEDULE Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (2007) (Rev. 2) Annotated for Statistical Reporting Purposes PHARMACEUTICAL APPENDIX TO THE TARIFF SCHEDULE 2 Table 1. This table enumerates products described by International Non-proprietary Names (INN) which shall be entered free of duty under general note 13 to the tariff schedule. The Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) registry numbers also set forth in this table are included to assist in the identification of the products concerned. For purposes of the tariff schedule, any references to a product enumerated in this table includes such product by whatever name known. ABACAVIR 136470-78-5 ACIDUM LIDADRONICUM 63132-38-7 ABAFUNGIN 129639-79-8 ACIDUM SALCAPROZICUM 183990-46-7 ABAMECTIN 65195-55-3 ACIDUM SALCLOBUZICUM 387825-03-8 ABANOQUIL 90402-40-7 ACIFRAN 72420-38-3 ABAPERIDONUM 183849-43-6 ACIPIMOX 51037-30-0 ABARELIX 183552-38-7 ACITAZANOLAST 114607-46-4 ABATACEPTUM 332348-12-6 ACITEMATE 101197-99-3 ABCIXIMAB 143653-53-6 ACITRETIN 55079-83-9 ABECARNIL 111841-85-1 ACIVICIN 42228-92-2 ABETIMUSUM 167362-48-3 ACLANTATE 39633-62-0 ABIRATERONE 154229-19-3 ACLARUBICIN 57576-44-0 ABITESARTAN 137882-98-5 ACLATONIUM NAPADISILATE 55077-30-0 ABLUKAST 96566-25-5 ACODAZOLE 79152-85-5 ABRINEURINUM 178535-93-8 ACOLBIFENUM 182167-02-8 ABUNIDAZOLE 91017-58-2 ACONIAZIDE 13410-86-1 ACADESINE 2627-69-2 ACOTIAMIDUM 185106-16-5 ACAMPROSATE 77337-76-9
    [Show full text]
  • Reduction in the Annualized Relapse Rate
    Future therapies Jerry S. Wolinsky, MD Bartels Family and Opal C. Rankin Professor of Neurology University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston Course of Relapsing MS SPMS atrophy Failure of Repair, disability Compensation and Concomitant Pathologies T2 burden Late RR black holes Inflammatory Phase Early RR CIS Subclinical (RIS) Gd Occurrence, or Severity Occurrence, Extent, Time Schoonheim et al. Neurology 74:1246, 2010 Current Disease Modifying Drugs: US Registration CDA po FTY po qd Annualized Relapse Rates: Proportional Treatment Effects 1.4 1992 – 2001 2002 - 2008 1.2 43.3% ▼ 57% ▼ 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 Annualized Relapse Rate Relapse Annualized Relative Risk: Current Disease Modifying Drugs MTZ NTZ FTY Warning – Not approved for CME semi-evidence based – with multipleIFN βcaveats GA hd IFNβ ld Increased Relative Efficacy Relapses Efficacy Relative Increased Increased Relative Safety Teriflunomide [Z]-2-cyano-3-hydroxy-but-2-enoic acid – [4’-trifluoromethyl-phenyl]-amide an inhibitor of pyrimidine synthesis primary metabolite of leflunomide Teriflunomide - MOA o Teriflunomide selectively and reversibly inhibits the mitochondrial enzyme DHO-DH, required for de novo pyrimidine synthesis o Teriflunomide blocks the activation and proliferation of stimulated lymphocytes which require de novo synthesis of pyrimidine to expand o Slowly dividing or resting cells which rely on the salvage pathway for pyrimidine synthesis are DHODH = dihydroorotate dehydrogenase relatively unaffected by teriflunomide Gold and Wolinsky, Acta Neurol Scand 124:75, 2011 Teriflunomide: Phase 3 - placebo controlled O’Connor et al. NEJM 365:1293, 2011 Teriflunomide: Phase 3 - placebo controlled O’Connor et al. NEJM 365:1293, 2011 Teriflunomide: Phase 2 – adjunct trials 6 month Safety Pilot Freedman et al.
    [Show full text]