Christian Apologetics and the Gradual Restriction of Dhimmi Social Religious Liberties from the Arab-Muslim Conquests to the Abbasid Era Michael J
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Eastern Michigan University DigitalCommons@EMU Master's Theses, and Doctoral Dissertations, and Master's Theses and Doctoral Dissertations Graduate Capstone Projects 2017 Shifting landscapes: Christian apologetics and the gradual restriction of dhimmi social religious liberties from the Arab-Muslim conquests to the Abbasid era Michael J. Rozek Follow this and additional works at: http://commons.emich.edu/theses Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Rozek, Michael J., "Shifting landscapes: Christian apologetics and the gradual restriction of dhimmi social religious liberties from the Arab-Muslim conquests to the Abbasid era" (2017). Master's Theses and Doctoral Dissertations. 863. http://commons.emich.edu/theses/863 This Open Access Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Master's Theses, and Doctoral Dissertations, and Graduate Capstone Projects at DigitalCommons@EMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses and Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@EMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Shifting Landscapes: Christian Apologetics and the Gradual Restriction of Dhimmī Social-Religious Liberties from the Arab-Muslim Conquests to the Abbasid Era by Michael J. Rozek Thesis Submitted to the Department of History Eastern Michigan University in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER of History in History Thesis Committee: Philip C. Schmitz, Ph.D, Chair John L. Knight, Ph.D April 21, 2017 Ypsilanti, Michigan Abstract This historical research study explores the changes of conquered Christians’ social-religious liberties from the first interactions between Christians and Arab-Muslims during the conquests c. A.D. 630 through the the ‘Abbasid era c. A.D. 850. Examining the development of Christian apologetic interaction over time and its effect within Muslim communities, apologetic dialogue and disputation generated a serious concern of apostasy in the Islamic Empire in which later Islamic legal scholars particularly emphasized and restricted Christian apologetics and evangelical actions in universal Islamic law codes, altering Christian social-religious living. This thesis suggests that Christian social-religious liberties did not immediately begin in conflict or legal restraint, but rather gradually developed and became restricted over time because Christians pressed in, crossed over, and challenged the religious beliefs of Islamic confessional communities, potentially prompting Arab-Muslims to convert to Christianity. !2 Table of Contents Abstract.........................................................................................................................2 Introduction...................................................................................................................4 Introduction.......................................................................................................4 Previous Scholarship.........................................................................................9 Problems with the Sources: Muslim and Non-Muslim……………………16-17 Methodology and Approach.............................................................................18 Purpose of the Work………………………………………………………18-19 Chapter 1: The Arab-Muslim Conquests and the Blurring of Social-Religious Boundaries: 630s to the 690s............................................................................................................20 The First Legal Document: The Constitution of Medina..................................23 The Second Legal Documents: The Covenants of the Prophet Muhammad with the Christians of the World........................................................................33 The Third Legal Documents: The Early Surrender Agreements and Sulh Compacts with the Conquered...........................................................................55 Chapter 2: “Islamization” of ‘Abd al-Malik and Christian Apologetic within the Development of Social-Religious Boundaries: 690s to the 750s........................................................71 From Non-Muslim to Dhimmī?........................................................................83 Real Dialogue and Disputation?.......................................................................86 Chapter 3: Apologetic Discourse and the Change from Blurring to Blatant Social-Religious Boundaries in the ‘Abbasid Era....................................................................................104 Continued Christian Dialogue and Apologetics?.............................................105 Historiography and Development of the Shurūt ‘Umar...................................118 Bibliography…………………………………………………………………….……133-36 !3 Introduction In December A.D. 634/A.H. 12,1 two years after the death of the prophet Muhammad, Arab-Muslims barred the annual Christmas Christian pilgrimage from Jerusalem to Bethlehem. The Christian Patriarch of Jerusalem, Sophronius, celebrated Christmas Mass in Jerusalem instead, delivered his homily there, and commented on the onslaughts that befell the surrounding communities. In the course of his Nativity sermon Sophronius asked, “Why do barbarian raids abound? Why are . the Saracens attacking us? Why has there been so much destruction and plunder? Why are there incessant outpourings of human blood? . Why have churches been pulled down? Why is the cross mocked? Why is Christ . blasphemed by pagan mouths?”2 In describing the desert raiders, Sophronius stated, “These God-fighters boast of prevailing over all, and unrestrainedly imitating their leader, who is the devil . .”3 The Patriarch, like many Christian writers in the early 7th century, did not fully understand the religion of the invaders. He thought that these raiders were pagans, that the raids would cease, and that the desert Arabs would retire back into the barrens of Arabia.4 But, unlike previous bedouin attackers, these Arabs occupied conquered cities, towns, and territories. The conquerors were not leaving. The 7th century Near East was an era of unrest and upheaval between the Byzantine and Sasanian empires, especially as Arab-Muslims fought and conquered these two realms. The Arab-Muslim conquerors made a minority among the majority of various ancient places, peoples, cultures, and religions they encountered. This thesis proposes to investigate the emergence and 1 The dating system used will be A.D. Anno Domini (in the year of the Lord), according to Christianity and the Western Tradition, and A.H. After Hijra, which, according to the Islamic tradition and calendar, dates at A.D. 622 signified in Muhammad’s flight from Mecca to Medina. Also, the time referent prior to A.H is B.H. or Before Hijra. 2 Robert Hoyland, Seeing Islam as Others Saw It: A Survey and Evaluation of Christian, Jewish, and Zoroastrian Writings on Early Islam (Princeton N.J.: The Darwin Press, 1997), 72. 3 Ibid., 73. The “leader” is presumed to have been Muhammad. 4 Sidney H. Griffith, The Church in the Shadow of the Mosque: Christians and Muslims in the World of Islam (Princeton N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2008), 25. !4 regulation of the social-religious liberties of the conquered from the initial conquests to the Abbasid era in general, but specifically will investigate how the role of confessional communal apologetic discourse and disputation affected and added to those regulations. In the 620s through the 680s Arab-Muslims advanced from city to city and established contracts with the inhabitants. These contracts were surrender treaties called sulh agreements, which provided protections called dhimmas. The conquered people who acceded to the terms of surrender in the contracts were called dhimmīs. The obligations and freedoms of the conquered differed in each contract, inversely to the degree that the people of the territory or city fought and resisted the Arab conquerors.5 In the early surrender agreements the conquerors enacted consistent conditions from the conquered peoples: to surrender, to pledge not to resist Arab- Muslim military forces, and to pay poll-taxes, called the jizya, and land taxes called the kharaj. Other frequent agreements in the surrender treaties were the conquered peoples’ protected freedom to continue to practice their religion, the protection of their places of worship, and the assurance of no forced conversion to the religion of the invaders.6 Therefore, as agreed between the conquerors and the conquered, Christians’ modus vivendi et status quo ante7 was to remain. However, Christians’ way of living and status quo before the Arab-Muslim conquests gradually changed and developed throughout the early Islamic Empire’s consolidation. Conquered peoples’ social-religious liberties became increasingly restricted from the time of the 5 Milka Levy-Rubin, Non-Muslims in the Early Islamic Empire: From Surrender to Coexistence (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011), 36. Conquered peoples actions to resist or capitulate resulted in the consequences of destroyed religious buildings such as churches. This is why when Sophronius the Patriarch of Jerusalem commented on churches being pulled down, and in other writings non-Muslims bespeak of the Arab- Muslim conquerors protecting the conquered peoples’ churches. 6 Hoyland, Seeing Islam as Others Saw It, 18. 7 “Way of living and the state that was before.” Modus vivendi is an arrangement or agreement allowing conflicting parties to coexist peacefully, either indefinitely or until a final settlement is reaching; a way of