Leonid Brezhnev Is Dead
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Cowl Providence, R.I
NON PROFIT ORG. U.S POSTAGE PAID THE COWL PROVIDENCE, R.I. PERMIT NO. 561 SPECIAL SUMMER ISSUE Wednesday, June 15, 1977 Providence, R.I. 02918 16 Pages Wilkins said, "The university has a choice, of course. It can seek to train scholars devoid of Wilkins speaks; ethics, indifferent to social change movements; callous to morality. Or, it can provide students with the intellectual tools necessary to understand the 1000 graduate world, to help make democracy work, to make our dreams for By Jane E. Hickey the class and the 5000 friends and equality and freedom come On May 24, 1977, Providence relatives of the graduates who true." College awarded 701 degrees to attended the ceremony. Wilkins He went on to enumerate the members of the Class of 1977 at also received an honorary degree civil rights problems of past its fifty-ninth annual Com• as a Doctor of Social Science. generations which still plague us mencement exercises in the In his low-key address, Wilkins in the present and concluded, "It Providence Civic Center. In charged the graduates with the will be up to this generation to addition, 236 graduate degrees responsibility of continuing solve the problems of racial in• were conferred and 79 students in progress in the area of civil rights justice ana to build a new nation the School of~ Continuing which previous generations with a new spirit. Our survival as Education received degrees. strove for so diligently. He spoke a race of people is at stake." Roy Wilkins, former executive of the potential role of the The ceremony itself was director of the NAACP addressed university in this area. -
Tradition1 P.115-125
TheThe TTRRAADDIITTIIOONN IN THIS SECTION Basketball Program History • Chronology of Important Dates • By The Numbers The Greatest Games • The Greatest Names • Award Winners • All-Americans Current NBA Players • Friars In The Pros • In-Season Tournaments Post-Season Tournaments • Notebook/Streaks • Alumni Hall 115 BASKETBALL PROGRAM HISTORY 1926-1943: Early Glory Year W L When Providence attempted to field a basketball team on 1926-27 8 8 an informal basis in 1921 and 1922, the Friars’ seasons were 1927-28 7 9 1928-29 17 3 cut short by a lack of coach, lack of facilities and lack of 1929-30 15 4 1930-31 14 5 interest. When the school reinstated basketball as a varsity 1931-32 19 5 sport in 1926-27, however, the team was ready to go. Archie 1932-33 13 3 1933-34 12 5 Golembeski, the school’s football coach, took the reins and 1934-35 17 5 1935-36 14 7 led the Friars to a .500 record that included a key upset of 1936-37 12 10 eastern power St. John’s. 1937-38 7 9 1938-39 4 7 After Golembeski left to devote more time to football, 1939-40 5 9 1940-41 11 6 Providence brought in Al “The General” McClellan and the pro- 1941-42 13 7 gram began to flourish. The Gen established PC almost imme- 1942-43 15 5 1943-44 No Team - WWII diately as perhaps the dominant team in New England and 1944-45 5 7 1945-46 5 12 garnered eastern and national attention for the fledgling pro- 1946-47 8 11 1947-48 10 10 gram. -
Murderer Dies As He Wished
■V- V V .1 ,-■ 21 - THE HERALD. Sal , Maroh 7, 1981 NlANCHESnR HAS IT Officials question Polish unions Pearson registers ■Friendship Force evacuation order become viable 100th coaching win ■plans exchanges W E S U aH E S T Page 3 Page 9 Page 13 Page 18 BUSINESS DIRECTORY GUIDE FOR ^ ITTE R S * SALADS ^HM YOUR HOLIDAY WEEKEND MANCHESTER AND SURROUNDING • iTuua SRcuLTn • iwiiM in ms I • a iH N M . •iTU iumruii iM M M CM8T H U S The Marinated Mushroom, Inc 646-3322 VIC IN ITY **U £ui£c Su of &oAi A * D r . S m ith 48 SHELDON ROAD • MANCHESTER, CONN. 182 Soeai Mato i t • MiiiBlieitor, GUNLIFFE AUTO BODY 763 o p p o s in g ROUTE 83 TALCOTTVILLE, CT. FEATURING THIS WEEK ... MAIN ST. 6 4 3 - 1 1 9 1 h e l l e r a U t 24 HR. TOWING 191 3 riv e r fill 6 4 3 -0 0 1 6 MAIN ST. MANCHESTER By MARY KITZMANN •COMPLETE COLLISION REPAIR Serving the Greater Manchester Area for 100 Years PERSONAL TEE Herald Reporter •FOREIGN AND AMERICAN CARS 6 4 3 - 1 9 0 0 •RUSTY JONES RUST PROOFING MA>CIIESTER - A prominent Manchoetor, Conn. Monday March 9,1981 25 Cent* conservationist opposes the town's 1081 MAIN ST. application with the U.S. Army Corps YiUlKEE AUIMMUM SERVICES of Engineers to fill in 200 feet of the 20 Warran 8L, Manehaatar Hockanum River. DOWNTOWN MANCHESTER (OppoiNi Roytl lo* Cr9*m) Dr. Douglas Smith, chairman of •4 ^ 1 1 0 1 the Hockanum Linear Park Commis with this ad sion and a member of the Conserva tion Commission, has written the esigns.m c Murderer dies 10% Discount state Department of Environmental 341 BROAO STRIET. -
In March 1972 the Leader of the Communist Party of the Soviet
MueRecognitionller in Return for Détente? Recognition in Return for Détente? Brezhnev, the EEC, and the Moscow Treaty with West Germany, 1970–1973 ✣ Wolfgang Mueller Downloaded from http://direct.mit.edu/jcws/article-pdf/13/4/79/697792/jcws_a_00167.pdf by guest on 24 September 2021 In March 1972 the leader of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (CPSU), Leonid Brezhnev, unexpectedly suggested that the Soviet Union might be willing to recognize the European Economic Community (EEC). Until that point, the Soviet Union had refused to recognize the EEC and had regularly and vigorously attacked it as a “community of monopolists” and a stalking horse for the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). Brezhnev’s predecessor, Nikita Khrushchev, had conveyed similar signals re- garding possible recognition in 1962, but he never turned the idea into reality. In contrast, some ten years later, Brezhnev inspired the start of negotiations between the EEC and the Soviet bloc’s Council of Mutual Economic Assis- tance (CMEA). This article draws on Soviet archival documents as well as Western and Russian publications and memoirs to analyze the background, circumstances, and consequences of Brezhnev’s initiative. The article gives special attention to the following questions: What convinced Brezhnev and his colleagues in 1972 to change their hitherto uniformly negative assessment of the EEC? Was this change the result of a major policy reassessment or simply a byproduct of other considerations? How was the initiative linked with broader Soviet foreign policy goals? Why was it not ultimately successful? In answering these questions, the article traces the external and internal factors that inspired the Soviet initiative, including the EEC enlargement process, East-West détente, CMEA integra- tion, Ostpolitik, and Soviet and East European economic and political develop- ments. -
USA Basketball Men's Pan American Games Media Guide Table Of
2015 Men’s Pan American Games Team Training Camp Media Guide Colorado Springs, Colorado • July 7-12, 2015 2015 USA Men’s Pan American Games 2015 USA Men’s Pan American Games Team Training Schedule Team Training Camp Staffing Tuesday, July 7 5-7 p.m. MDT Practice at USOTC Sports Center II 2015 USA Pan American Games Team Staff Head Coach: Mark Few, Gonzaga University July 8 Assistant Coach: Tad Boyle, University of Colorado 9-11 a.m. MDT Practice at USOTC Sports Center II Assistant Coach: Mike Brown 5-7 p.m. MDT Practice at USOTC Sports Center II Athletic Trainer: Rawley Klingsmith, University of Colorado Team Physician: Steve Foley, Samford Health July 9 8:30-10 a.m. MDT Practice at USOTC Sports Center II 2015 USA Pan American Games 5-7 p.m. MDT Practice at USOTC Sports Center II Training Camp Court Coaches Jason Flanigan, Holmes Community College (Miss.) July 10 Ron Hunter, Georgia State University 9-11 a.m. MDT Practice at USOTC Sports Center II Mark Turgeon, University of Maryland 5-7 p.m. MDT Practice at USOTC Sports Center II July 11 2015 USA Pan American Games 9-11 a.m. MDT Practice at USOTC Sports Center II Training Camp Support Staff 5-7 p.m. MDT Practice at USOTC Sports Center II Michael Brooks, University of Louisville July 12 Julian Mills, Colorado Springs, Colorado 9-11 a.m. MDT Practice at USOTC Sports Center II Will Thoni, Davidson College 5-7 p.m. MDT Practice at USOTC Sports Center II USA Men’s Junior National Team Committee July 13 Chair: Jim Boeheim, Syracuse University NCAA Appointee: Bob McKillop, Davidson College 6-8 p.m. -
Introduction Looking Back at Brezhnev
russian history 41 (2014) 299-306 brill.com/ruhi Introduction Looking Back at Brezhnev Peter Rutland Wesleyan University [email protected] Victoria Smolkin-Rothrock Wesleyan University [email protected] In the West, the Soviet Union is most often viewed through the Cold War lens of capitalist triumph over socialist decline and failure. Rather than take seri- ously the communist challenge to capitalist modernity, the Soviet project is presented as a historical dead-end, a doomed experiment that collapsed under the weight of its own contradictions. The Soviet Union – the story goes – was ruled by a stultified bureaucracy under which citizens enjoyed limited per- sonal freedom and dissidents were ruthlessly persecuted. The attempt to build a centrally-planned economy on principles antithetical to the market led to colossal inefficiency and stagnant growth. Moscow’s competition with the United States for global hegemony brought the world to the brink of nuclear war and fueled bitter conflicts from Afghanistan to Angola. The system’s survival depended on stringent controls on communication with the outside world. Russians, of course, have a more complicated relationship to their own past. Even as the historical legacies of Lenin and Stalin, Khrushchev and Gorbachev, remain contentious, the Soviet Union of Leonid Brezhnev, who was General Secretary from 1964 to 1982, is often portrayed as something of a golden age.1 The papers gathered here were originally presented at a conference “What Was the Soviet Union? Looking back at the Brezhnev years,” held at Wesleyan University on 20–21 October 2011. 1 See Otto Boele, “Remembering Brezhnev in the New Millennium: Post-Soviet Nostalgia and Local Identity in the City of Novorossiisk,” The Soviet and Post-Soviet Review 38 (2011): 3–29, as well as the theme issue on the “long 1970s” in the Russian journal Neprikosnovennyi zapas 52 (2007). -
Detente Or Razryadka? the Kissinger-Dobrynin Telephone Transcripts and Relaxing American-Soviet Tensions, 1969-1977
Claremont Colleges Scholarship @ Claremont CGU Theses & Dissertations CGU Student Scholarship 2013 Detente or Razryadka? The Kissinger-Dobrynin Telephone Transcripts and Relaxing American- Soviet Tensions, 1969-1977. Daniel S. Stackhouse Jr. Claremont Graduate University Recommended Citation Stackhouse, Daniel S. Jr.. (2013). Detente or Razryadka? The Kissinger-Dobrynin Telephone Transcripts and Relaxing American-Soviet Tensions, 1969-1977.. CGU Theses & Dissertations, 86. http://scholarship.claremont.edu/cgu_etd/86. doi: 10.5642/cguetd/86 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the CGU Student Scholarship at Scholarship @ Claremont. It has been accepted for inclusion in CGU Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholarship @ Claremont. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Détente or Razryadka? The Kissinger-Dobrynin Telephone Transcripts and Relaxing American-Soviet Tensions, 1969-1977 by Daniel S. Stackhouse, Jr. A final project submitted to the Faculty of Claremont Graduate University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History. Claremont Graduate University 2013 Copyright Daniel S. Stackhouse, Jr., 2013 All rights reserved. APPROVAL OF THE REVIEW COMMITTEE This dissertation has been duly read, reviewed, and critiqued by the Committee listed below, which hereby approves the manuscript of Daniel S. Stackhouse, Jr. as fulfilling the scope and quality requirements for meriting the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Janet Farrell Brodie, Chair Claremont Graduate University Professor of History William Jones Claremont Graduate University Professor of History Joshua Goode Claremont Graduate University Professor of History ABSTRACT Détente or Razryadka? The Kissinger-Dobrynin Telephone Transcripts and Relaxing American-Soviet Tensions, 1969-1977 by Daniel S. -
War Memory Under the Leonid Brezhnev Regime 1965-1974
1 No One is Forgotten, Nothing is Forgotten: War Memory Under the Leonid Brezhnev Regime 1965-1974 By Yevgeniy Zilberman Adviser: Professor David S. Foglesong An Honors Thesis Submitted To The History Department of Rutgers University School of Arts and Sciences New Brunswick, NJ April, 2012 2 Table of Contents Acknowledgements Pg. 3 Introduction Pg. 5 1964-1967: Building the Cult Pg. 18 a) Forming the Narrative: Building the Plot and Effacing the Details Pg. 21 b) Consecrating the War: Ritual, Monument and Speech Pg. 24 c) Iconography at Work: Soviet War Poster Pg. 34 d) Digitizing the War: On the Cinema Front Pg. 44 1968-1970: Fascism Revived and the Battle for Peace Pg. 53 a) This Changes Everything: Czechoslovakia and its Significance Pg. 55 b) Anti-Fascism: Revanchism and Fear Pg. 59 c) Reviving Peace: The Peace Cult Pg. 71 1970-1974: Realizing Peace Pg. 83 a) Rehabilitating Germany Pg. 85 b) Cinema: Germany and the Second World War on the Film Screen Pg. 88 c) Developing Ostpolitik: War memory and the Foundations for Peace Pg. 95 d) Embracing Peace Pg. 102 Conclusion: Believing the War Cult Pg. 108 Bibliography Pg. 112 3 Acknowledgements Perhaps as a testament to my naivety, when I embarked upon my journey toward writing an honors thesis, I envisioned a leisurely and idyllic trek toward my objective. Instead, I found myself on a road mired with multiple peaks and valleys. The obstacles and impediments were plentiful and my limitations were numerous. Looking back now upon the path I traveled, I realize that I could not have accomplished anything without the assistance of a choice collection of individuals. -
Mikhail Gorbachev and His Role in the Peaceful Solution of the Cold War
City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works Dissertations and Theses City College of New York 2011 Mikhail Gorbachev and His Role in the Peaceful Solution of the Cold War Natalia Zemtsova CUNY City College How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/cc_etds_theses/49 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] Mikhail Gorbachev and His Role in the Peaceful Solution of the Cold War Natalia Zemtsova May 2011 Master’s Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of International Affairs at the City College of New York Advisor: Jean Krasno ABSTRACT The role of a political leader has always been important for understanding both domestic and world politics. The most significant historical events are usually associated in our minds with the images of the people who were directly involved and who were in charge of the most crucial decisions at that particular moment in time. Thus, analyzing the American Civil War, we always mention the great role and the achievements of Abraham Lincoln as the president of the United States. We cannot forget about the actions of such charismatic leaders as Adolf Hitler, Josef Stalin, Winston Churchill, and Franklin D. Roosevelt when we think about the brutal events and the outcome of the World War II. Or, for example, the Cuban Missile Crisis and its peaceful solution went down in history highlighting roles of John F. -
Domestic and Foreign Problems of the Brezhnev Era CHAPTER 5 Domestic and Foreign Problems of the Brezhnev Era
Chapter 5: Domestic and foreign problems of the Brezhnev era CHAPTER 5 Domestic and foreign problems of the Brezhnev era This chapter analyses Leonid Brezhnev’s rule of the USSR until his death in 1982. The extent to which this was an era of political, economic and social stagnation is fully explored. Soviet foreign policy in the 1970s is also discussed, in particular the reasons for the Soviet intervention in Afghanistan and its consequences. You need to consider the following questions throughout this chapter: + What were the key features of the USSR’s politics, society and economy under Brezhnev? + Was Brezhnev’s leadership to blame for Soviet stagnation from 1964 to 1982? + What challenges did Soviet foreign policy face in the Brezhnev era? + To what extent were the USSR’s aims achieved in Afghanistan? + Why did the USSR invade Afghanistan? + How serious were the socio-economic and political problems confronting the USSR by the time of Brezhnev’s death? 1 Politics, economy and society under Brezhnev Key question: What were the key features of the USSR’s politics, society and economy under Brezhnev? By 1964, Nikita Khrushchev, the First Secretary of the Communist Party of KEY TERM the Soviet Union (CPSU), was viewed by senior party members as increasingly unable to exercise the necessary leadership and stability Presidium Dominant, required for the USSR to uphold its world position. policy-making body within the CPSU formed by the Khrushchev was removed from party leadership following a plot by Council of Ministers, members of the Presidium, in which Leonid Brezhnev played a leading part. -
The Brezhnev Bibliography
The Brezhnev Bibliography General works on the Brezhnev era Amalrik, A., Will the Soviet Union Survive Until 1984? (London, 1970). Bialer, S., Stalin’s Successors (Cambridge, 1980). Bialer, S., The Soviet Paradox; External Expansion, Internal Decline (London, 1986). Bialer, S. and T. Gustafson (eds), Russia at the Crossroads: The 26th Congress of the CPSU (London, 1982). Breslauer, G., Khrushchev and Brezhnev as Leaders (London, 1982). Brezhnev, L. I., Leninskim kursom, 7 vols (Moscow, 1970–9). Brezhnev, L. I., Ob osnovnykh voprosakh ekonomicheskoi politiki KPSS na sovremennom etape, 2 vols (Moscow, 1975). Brezhnev, L. I., Malaya zemlya (Moscow, 1978). Brezhnev, L. I., Ob osnovnykh voprosakh ekonomicheskoi politiki KPSS na sovremennom etape: rechi i doklady, 2 vols, expanded edn (Moscow, 1979). Brown, A. and M. Kaser (eds), The Soviet Union Since the Fall of Khrushchev, 2nd edn (London, 1978). Cohen, S., Rethinking the Soviet Experience (Oxford, 1985). Cohen, S., A. Rabinowitch and R. Sharlet (eds), The Soviet Union Since Stalin (London, 1980). Colton, T., The Dilemma of Reform in the USSR (New York, 1986). Conquest, R., Russia after Khrushchev (New York, 1965). Dallin, A. (ed.), The Khrushchev and Brezhnev Years (New York, 1992). Dallin, A. (ed.), The 25th Congress of the CPSU (Stanford, 1977). Dallin, A. and G. Lapidus (eds), The Soviet System in Crisis (Boulder, Col., 1991). Dornberg, J., Brezhnev. The Masks of Power (London, 1974). Fleron, F. J. (ed.), Technology and Communist Culture (New York, 1977). Hosking, G., A History of the Soviet Union, final edn (London, 1994). Hough, J., ‘The Brezhnev Era: The Man and the System’ Problems of Communism, 25(4), 1976. -
The USSR: Oligarchy Or Dictatorship?
ROBERT G. WESSON The USSR: Oligarchy or Dictatorship? By the summer of 1971 Leonid Brezhnev had apparently become effective head of state of the Soviet Union and its spokesman. When Chancellor Brandt visited the Soviet Union in September he conferred with no one else, and Pravda reported (September 19) that "responsible members of the Secretariat of the General Secretary" participated in the conversations. One is reminded of the power obscurely exercised by Stalin's personal secretariat, especially the mysterious Poskrebyshev during the later years of his rule, and of the role of Hitler's secretariat, headed by Martin Bormann. Yet Brezhnev is certainly not the despot implied by these analogies. Officially, he has assumed no new powers. More important, no one has been ousted from the top circle since 1965, when the regime seemed to be truly a plural leadership in which no individual was clearly dominant. Yet it is practically the first task of a new tyrant to replace with his dependents those who were formerly his equals or at least potential rivals. This raises anew the question whether a plural-oligarchic or a single, more or less dictatorial leadership may be considered the more normal one in the Soviet system. History does not give a clear answer. About two-thirds of the fifty-four years since 1917 have seen individual, although not necessarily autocratic, rulership; but this proportion is distorted by the very long dictator ship of Stalin, which is unlikely to be repeated without systemic change. Stalin was forty-two when he became general secretary, but Brezhnev was fifty-eight on attaining the top party post, and the apparatus continues to age.