DOCSLIB.ORG

House Wren (Troglodytes Aedon) Natalie Dubois

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
House Wren (Troglodytes Aedon) Natalie Dubois House Wren (Troglodytes aedon) Natalie Dubois Grandville, Kent Co., MI (Click to view a comparison of Atlas I to II) 8/9/2005 © John Van Orman This species sponsored in memory of Donald Corser Rhead States for the winter months. The historical Both beloved and notorious, the House Wren’s breeding range likely included Michigan (Boies 1875, Gibbs 1880, Cook 1893) and areas further drab plumage belies its feisty nature and north (McIlwraith 1894), but began expanding bubbling song. A common summer inhabitant southward in the late 1880s as fragmentation of open, shrubby woodlands and forest edges, it and clearing of intact forest increased the easily makes its home in suburban areas and is availability of suitable habitat (Johnson 1998). frequently found nesting in backyard nest boxes. Distributions may be limited by temperature Perhaps the most studied passerine in North (Kendeigh 1963), which suggests the potential America, House Wrens have been the subject of for breeding distributions to be impacted by extensive research ranging from aspects of warming temperatures due to climate change physiology to behavior. Their propensity to (Zuckerberg et al. 2009). In Michigan, breeding puncture and remove eggs from the nests of ranges remained fairly constant between MBBA other birds was the subject of a cantankerous I and MBBA II. House Wrens are widely debate in the 1920s over the “character” of the distributed throughout the LP, being almost little bird (started by Sherman 1925a, 1925b, ubiquitous in townships across the southern and followed by a number of accounts in Bird- portion of the peninsula and becoming patchily Lore that same year). The behavior has been distributed towards the northern LP. Although implicated in population declines in at least two less widely distributed in the UP, similar other species: Bewick’s Wrens (Kennedy and patterns are observed with occurrences White 1996) and Eastern Bluebirds (Zeleny primarily at lower latitudes in the southern 1985). counties adjacent to Wisconsin and restricted distributions further north. A preference for Distribution deciduous vegetation, smaller forest tracts, and House Wrens breed from coast to coast, across a open woodlands may account for lower broad region extending from the Carolinas, frequency of occurrence in the northern LP and central plains, and northern California UP. During MBBA I, evidence of breeding was northwards into the southern Canadian detected in 95% of townships in the SLP, 73% provinces, returning to the southern United © 2011 Kalamazoo Nature Center House Wren (Troglodytes aedon) Natalie Dubois of townships in the NLP, and 26% of townships 1982-2007 from routes across Michigan show in the UP. In MBBA II, occurrences were 96%, patterns similar to USFWS Region 3 as a whole, 67%, and 35%, respectively. The atlas data indicating small but significant increases in suggest that distributions may have expanded abundance of approximately 1% per year. Well slightly in the UP, but appear fairly stable in the distributed throughout the Great Lakes states LP based on the township level data. and neighboring Canadian provinces, regional populations appear to be relatively stable. Breeding Biology However BBS data indicate modest declines in In southern Michigan, male House Wrens arrive the Northeast as well as in portions of in mid to late April, and the first females arrive Minnesota and northern Wisconsin (Sauer et al. several days to a week later. Arrival dates may 2008). Historically, changes in abundance have be slightly delayed further north. Upon arrival, been associated with land use changes. House males establish territories and begin Wrens have likely benefited from widespread constructing nests by placing a few to hundreds fragmentation and clearing of intact forests in of small sticks in available cavities. Females the central and eastern U.S., but densities select a single nest to line and typically lay a probably decrease in intensely developed areas. clutch of 5-7 eggs. Throughout their range in Conditions on the wintering grounds can also Michigan, House Wrens are frequently double- impact population abundance on the breeding brooded. In Barry County, early season range. clutches were initiated in May and late season clutches in mid-June through July. Some males Conservation Needs obtain second mates, and the occurrence of Both the global and state status of this species is polygyny depends in part on a male’s ability to secure (NatureServe 2009). Populations appear defend territories containing multiple cavities to be stable or increasing throughout much of (Johnson and Kermott 1991). Research on a the species’ range in Michigan and no specific Michigan population has shown that females management actions are planned at this time. mated to males with surplus cavities in their Population size may be limited by cavity territories lay larger clutches consisting of availability in some locations. Installation of proportionally more male offspring compared to nest boxes may increase numbers but may also females mated to males with a single cavity increase interference with nesting success of (Dubois et al. 2006). Genetic evidence from an other species. Illinois population indicates that extra pair young (i.e., those sired by a male other than the Literature Cited female’s social mate) can be fairly common Boies, A.H. 1875. A Catalogue of the Birds (Soukup and Thompson 1997). Ascertained to Occur in Southern Michigan. W.T.B. Schermerhorn, Hudson, Michigan, Abundance and Population Trends USA. (Click to view trends from the BBS) Cook, A.J. 1893. Birds of Michigan, 2nd ed. Partners in Flight estimates a population size of Michigan State Agriculture Experiment 310,000 individuals in Michigan, or 1.6% of the Station Bulletin 94. State Agricultural total North American population (PIF 2008). College, East Lansing, Michigan, USA. The BBS trend map for the time period from Dubois, N.S., E.D. Kennedy, and T. Getty. 1966-2003 suggests that populations may have 2006. Surplus nest boxes and the potential declined over this period in the NLP, but held for polygyny affect clutch size and offspring steady or increased in the SLP and UP (Sauer et sex ratio in house wrens. Proceedings of the al. 2008). More recent BBS estimates from © 2011 Kalamazoo Nature Center House Wren (Troglodytes aedon) Natalie Dubois Royal Society of London Series B 273: distributions in New York State. Global 1751-1757. Change Biology 15: 1866-1883. Gibbs, M. 1880. Annotated list of the birds of Suggested Citation Michigan. Bulletin of the United States Geological and Geographical Survey 5: 481- Dubois, N. 2011. House Wren (Troglodytes 497. aedon). In A.T. Chartier, J.J. Baldy, and Johnson, L.S. 1998. House Wren (Troglodytes J.M. Brenneman, editors. The Second aedon). Account 380 in A. Poole and F. Gill, Michigan Breeding Bird Atlas. Kalamazoo editors. The Birds of North America. The Nature Center. Kalamazoo, Michigan, USA. Birds of North America, Inc., Philadelphia, Accessed online at: <www.mibirdatlas.org Pennsylvania, USA. /Portals/12/MBA2010/HOWRaccount.pdf >. Johnson, L.S., and L.H, Kermott. 1991. Effect of nest-site supplementation on polygynous behavior in the house wren (Troglodytes aedon). Condor 93: 784–787. Kendeigh, S.C. 1963. Regulation of nesting time and distribution in the House Wren. Wilson Bulletin 75: 418-427. Kennedy, E.D., and D.W. White. 1996. Interference competition from House Wrens as a factor in the decline of Bewick’s Wrens. Conservation Biology 10: 281-284. McIlwraith, T. 1894. The Birds of Ontario, 2nd ed. William Briggs, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. NatureServe. 2009. NatureServe Explorer: An online encyclopedia of life . Version 7.1. <http://www.natureserve.org/explorer>. Accessed 24 April 2010. Sauer, J.R., J.E. Hines, and J. Fallon. 2008. The North American Breeding Bird Survey, Results and Analysis 1966-2007. Version 5.15.2008. USGS Patuxent Wildlife Research Center. Laurel, Maryland, USA. Sherman, A.R. 1925a. Down with the House Wren boxes. Wilson Bulletin 32: 5-13. Sherman, A. R. 1925b. The problem of the House Wren. Bird-Lore 27: 97-100. Soukup, S.S., and C.F. Thompson. 1997. Social mating system affects the frequency of extra-pair paternity in house wrens. Animal Behaviour 54: 1089-1105. Zeleny, L. 1985. Bluebirds and the House Wren problem. Sialia 7: 57-58. Zuckerberg, B., A.M. Woods, and W.F. Porter. 2009. Poleward shifts in breeding bird © 2011 Kalamazoo Nature Center .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • House Wren Vs. House Sparrow
    NEST BOX DRAMA: HOUSE WREN VS. HOUSE SPARROW GARTH NELSON, 529 Dalhousie Crescent, Saskatoon, SK S7H 3S5 Figure 1. The disputed birdhouse and its contents, fall 1999 Garth Nelson In 1997, we were seeking a tenant for since. We did see a House Wren go in our birdhouse. We were hoping to and inspect it early last week. attract a House Wren, but ended up with a House Sparrow. And so, the following June 5,1998 : Earlier this week we saw year, I altered the “doorway” of the House Sparrows starting a nest on top birdhouse, so that only a wren would be of the birdhouse, wedged between the able to get inside. Needless to say, slanted roof of the birdhouse and the although the wrens were happy with this eaves of the garage. I took it down from renovation, the sparrows were furious. the garage and relocated it in the crab What followed was nothing less than a apple tree. Today, House Wrens were in pitched battle. and out of it with nesting material. They were singing in our yard this evening. May 24,1998 : House Sparrows are still trying to get into our birdhouse. About June 6, 1998 : Some interesting bird a week ago I put up the birdhouse under dynamics today! After breakfast, we the eaves of the garage. I had altered it noticed the male House Sparrow so that the hole is 1 inch in diameter frantically trying to get into the birdhouse instead of VA inches, hoping to keep while the House Wren fretted nearby, out the House Sparrows and attract a watching him intently.
    [Show full text]
  • House Wren Monitoring
    House Wren Intern Summary By: Jon Van Arragon Summer 2020 The Beaverhill Bird Observatory keeps record of the nesting success of House Wrens in man-made nest boxes throughout the Beaverhill Natural Area. There are 4 House Wren nest box grids labeled A-D, the boxes are arranged in a 5x5 square in grids A, C, and D; grid B is arranged in a 3x8 manner. These grids are located in mature stands of aspen and poplar forest. There are 99 House Wren boxes in total throughout the natural area. The nest boxes in all 4 grids were checked weekly from May 23 to July 21, 2020. On each visit I recorded the extent of construction for each nest, the number of eggs, the number and ages of any nestlings, and the presence of any adult birds nearby. The House Wren boxes are also frequently used by Tree Swallows, swallow nests were also monitored according to the same protocol. 51 of the 99 nest boxes in the House Wren grids were occupied during the survey period. 35 of those boxes were occupied by House Wrens; the remaining 16 nest boxes were occupied by Tree Swallows. House Wrens nesting in the grids had an average clutch size of 6.44 eggs; Tree Swallows in the same grids had an average clutch size of 4.62 eggs. The average number of nestlings in House Wren nests was 5.08; the average number of Tree Swallow nestlings in the grids was 3.83. Of the 35 House Wren nests constructed, 11 had young that successfully fledged, giving what appears to be a success rate of 31%.
    [Show full text]
  • House Wren Troglodytes Aedon
    House Wren Troglodytes aedon House Wrens are small, plain, brown birds, more distinguished for their exuberant, me­ lodious voices and frenetic behavior than for their outward appearance. Although far from abundant, House Wrens are among the more familiar inhabitants of yards, gar­ dens, and farm hedgerows in the warmer ! parts of Vermont. They are cavity nesters, taking readily to birdhouses and utilizing a wide variety of natural and artificial cavities. ~! House Wrens forage near the ground and thus prefer the cover provided by thick, brushy vegetation. These birds are not al­ dates for Vermont, determined from 10 ways associated with human habitation; iso­ clutches, range from May 18 to July 16. lated pairs may be found nesting in a variety Records of 17 nests containing young in­ of locales, including beaver ponds, swamps, clude dates from June 10 to August 2; six hedgerows, and streamside thickets. dates for recently fledged young range from Male House Wrens return to Vermont in June 24 to August 8. Late fledgling dates late April and early May; most are back by suggest that eggs are sometimes laid as late the first week of May. They immediately set as the first week of July. Although House about establishing territories by sounding Wrens are usually double-brooded, in north­ their distinctive loud, bubbling warble, and ern Vermont most pairs probably only man­ begin claiming all available nest sites within age a single brood. The species' autumn their territories by building stick "nests" in migration is inconspicuous, probably peak­ all nearby cavities. Nest sites are generally ing in September.
    [Show full text]
  • Bird Houses for Cavity Nesting Songbirds – SW Oregon – Guidelines
    Lee Webb, Wildlife Biologist 22 March 2002 Bird Houses for Cavity Nesting Songbirds – SW Oregon – Guidelines Nest Box Placement 1. Face box away from afternoon sun, nor should the prevailing wind blow into the opening. 2. Correct height, but not so high the box can’t be checked or cleaned (see Table below). 3. Generally, nest boxes placed on the bare portion of a tree trunk or on a pole in the open have a better chance of being occupied than do boxes surrounded by vegetation. 4. The top of the box should not tip to the rear (backwards). Young birds might not be able to get out! 5. Boxes do not need perches, which serve predators better than residents of the boxes. 6. Well-spaced-out boxes will receive more use than those clustered together. (Avoid inter- and intra-species territorial conflicts.) If possible, place boxes so that one cannot be seen from another. 7. Black-capped chickadee (conifer), White-breasted Nuthatch (conifer), Oak Titmouse (hardwood), and Ash-throated Flycatcher (hardwood) seem to favor nest boxes placed up into the lowest live limbs of the preferred tree type, a short distance (perhaps 1 to 3 feet) out from the bole, preferably not in densely vegetative limbs, but somewhat open. (Dennis Vroman) Song birds which use standard “square” nest boxes with an entrance hole of 1½" SW Oregon (Siskiyou National Forest and surrounding areas) Likely Possible (these species tend to prefer natural “tree-like” cavities) Western Bluebird Black-capped Chickadee* Mountain Bluebird (at high elevation) Chestnut-backed Chickadee* (higher elevation) Tree Swallow Mountain Chickadee* (at high elevation) Violet-green Swallow White-breasted Nuthatch* (valleys, foothills) House Finch (sometimes nest in bird houses) Red-breasted Nuthatch* (higher elevation) House Wren* Oak Titmouse* (valleys, foothills) Bewick’s Wren* Bold = most common nest box users in interior (Rogue/Illinois) valleys.
    [Show full text]
  • Natal and Breeding Dispersal in House Wrens (Troglodytes Aedon)
    NATAL AND BREEDING DISPERSAL IN HOUSE WRENS (TROGLODYTES AEDON) NANCY E. DRILLING AND CHARLES F. THOMPSON EcologyGroup, Department of BiologicalSciences, IllinoisState University,Normal, Illinois 61761 USA ABSTRACT.--Westudied the natal and breeding dispersalof yearling and adult HouseWrens (Troglodytesaedon) for 7 yr in central Illinois. The forestedstudy areascontained 910 identical nest boxesplaced in a grid pattern. On average38.1% (n = 643) of the adult malesand 23.3% (n = 1,468) of the adult females present in one year returned the next; 2.8% (n = 6,299) of the nestlingsthat survived to leave the nest returned eachyear. Adult male (median distance = 67 m) and adult female (median = 134 m) breeding dispersalwas lessthan yearling male (median = 607.5 m) and yearling female (median = 674 m) natal dispersal.Females that returned had producedmore offspringthe previousseason than had nonreturningfemales, and femalesthat successfullyproduced at leastone chick in their last nesting attempt of the previousseason moved shorter distances than did unsuccessfulfemales. There were, however, no consistentdifferences between returning and nonreturning femalesin two other measures of reproductivesuccess. Females that were unsuccessfulin their lastbreeding attempt of the previousyear were more likely to be successfulin their next attempt if they moved two or more territoriesthan if they did not move. Reproductivesuccess did not affectthe likelihood that a male would return nor the distancethat he moved.The successof subsequentnesting attemptsby maleswas
    [Show full text]
  • Foraging Behavior of Plain-Mantled Tit-Spinetail (Leptasthenura Aegithaloides) in Semiarid Matorral, North-Central Chile
    ORNITOLOGIA NEOTROPICAL 22: 247–256, 2011 © The Neotropical Ornithological Society FORAGING BEHAVIOR OF PLAIN-MANTLED TIT-SPINETAIL (LEPTASTHENURA AEGITHALOIDES) IN SEMIARID MATORRAL, NORTH-CENTRAL CHILE Andrew Engilis Jr. & Douglas A. Kelt Department of Wildlife, Fish, and Conservation Biology - University of California, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA. E-mail: [email protected] Resumen. – Comportamiento de forrajeo del tijeral (Leptasthenura aegithaloides) en matorral semiárido, centro-norte de Chile. – Hemos estudiado el comportamiento de forrajeo del tijeral (Leptas- thenura aegithaloides) en el matorral del centro-norte de Chile. Se trata de una especie de la familia Fur- nariidae que es insectívora recolectora desde perchas. Frecuenta los arbustos más dominantes y busca presas y alimentos principalmente en el follaje, grupos de flores, pequeñas ramas y masas de líquenes. Los arbustos preferidos incluyen a Porlieria y Baccharis. Se alimentan desde alturas cercanas al suelo hasta arbustos superiores a dos metros de altura. Se los encuentra más frecuentemente en parejas o en grupos pequeños, posiblemente familias, de tres a cinco aves. Las densidades promedio en el matorral (1,49 - 1,69 aves por hectárea) son mayores que las reportadas para otros lugares. Los tijerales en el matorral forman grupos de especies mixtas con facilidad, especialmente en el invierno Austral. Su estrategia de forrajeo y su comportamiento son similares a las del Mito sastrecillo de América del Norte (Psaltriparus minimus) y del Mito común (Aegithalos caudatus), ambos de la familia Aegithalidae, sugir- iendo estrategias ecológicas convergentes en ambientes estructuralmente similares. Abstract. – We studied foraging behavior of Plain-mantled Tit-spinetail (Leptasthenura aegithaloides) in matorral (scrubland) habitat of north-central Chile.
    [Show full text]
  • Early- to Mid-Succession Birds Guild
    Supplemental Volume: Species of Conservation Concern SC SWAP 2015 Early- to Mid-Succession Birds Guild Bewick's Wren Thryomanes bewickii Blue Grosbeak Guiraca caerulea Blue-winged Warbler Vermivora pinus Brown Thrasher Toxostoma rufum Chestnut-sided Warbler Dendroica pensylvanic Dickcissel Spiza americana Eastern Kingbird Tyrannus tyrannus Eastern Towhee Pipilo erythrophthalmus Golden-winged Warbler Vermivora chrysoptera Gray Kingbird Tyrannus dominicensis Indigo Bunting Passerina cyanea Orchard Oriole Icterus spurius Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor White-eyed Vireo Vireo griseus Yellow-billed Cuckoo Coccyzus americanus Yellow-breasted Chat Icteria virens NOTE: The Yellow-billed Cuckoo is also discussed in the Deciduous Forest Interior Birds Guild. Contributors (2005): Elizabeth Ciuzio (KYDNR), Anna Huckabee Smith (NCWRC), and Dennis Forsythe (The Citadel) Reviewed and Edited: (2012) John Kilgo (USFS), Nick Wallover (SCDNR); (2013) Lisa Smith (SCDNR) and Anna Huckabee Smith (SCDNR) DESCRIPTION Taxonomy and Basic Description All bird species in this guild belong to the taxonomic order Passeriformes (perching birds) and they are grouped in 9 different families. The Blue-winged, Chestnut-sided, Golden-winged, and Prairie Warblers are in the family Parulidae (the wood warblers). The Eastern and Gray Kingbirds are in the flycatcher family, Tyrannidae. The Blue Grosbeak, Dickcissel, and Indigo Bunting are in the family Cardinalidae. The Bewick’s Wren is in the wren family, Troglodytidae. The orchard oriole belongs to the family Icteridae. The Brown Thrasher is in the family Mimidae, the Yellow-billed Cuckoo belongs to the family Cuculidae, the Eastern Towhee is in the family Emberizidae, and the White-eyed Vireo is in the family Vireonidae. All are small Blue-winged Warbler birds and can be distinguished by song, appearance, and habitat preference.
    [Show full text]
  • Troglodytes Troglodytes
    Troglodytes troglodytes -- (Linnaeus, 1758) ANIMALIA -- CHORDATA -- AVES -- PASSERIFORMES -- TROGLODYTIDAE Common names: Winter Wren; Wren European Red List Assessment European Red List Status LC -- Least Concern, (IUCN version 3.1) Assessment Information Year published: 2015 Date assessed: 2015-03-31 Assessor(s): BirdLife International Reviewer(s): Symes, A. Compiler(s): Ashpole, J., Burfield, I., Ieronymidou, C., Pople, R., Wheatley, H. & Wright, L. Assessment Rationale European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC) EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC) In Europe this species has an extremely large range, and hence does not approach the thresholds for Vulnerable under the range size criterion (Extent of Occurrence 10% in ten years or three generations, or with a specified population structure). The population trend appears to be stable, and hence the species does not approach the thresholds for Vulnerable under the population trend criterion (30% decline over ten years or three generations). For these reasons the species is evaluated as Least Concern in Europe. Within the EU27 this species has an extremely large range, and hence does not approach the thresholds for Vulnerable under the range size criterion (Extent of Occurrence 10% in ten years or three generations, or with a specified population structure). Despite the fact that the population trend appears to be decreasing, the decline is not believed to be sufficiently rapid to approach the thresholds for Vulnerable under the population trend criterion (30% decline over ten years or three generations). For these reasons the species is evaluated as Least Concern in the EU27. Occurrence Countries/Territories of Occurrence Native: Albania; Andorra; Armenia; Austria; Azerbaijan; Belarus; Belgium; Bosnia and Herzegovina; Bulgaria; Croatia; Cyprus; Czech Republic; Denmark; Faroe Islands (to DK); Estonia; Finland; France; Georgia; Germany; Greece; Hungary; Iceland; Ireland, Rep.
    [Show full text]
  • House Wren Nest-Destroying Behavior’
    The Condor 88:190-193 0 The Cooper Ornithological Society 1986 HOUSE WREN NEST-DESTROYING BEHAVIOR’ JEAN-CLAUDE BELLES-ISLES AND JAROSLAV PICMAN Department of Biology, Universityof Ottawa, Ottawa KIN 6N5, Canada Abstract. House Wren (Troglodytesaedon) nest-destroying behavior was studied by experi- mentally offering 38 wrens nestswith eggs(or nestlings)throughout the nesting season.Individuals of both sexespecked all six types of eggspresented, regardless of the nest type and location. House Wrens also attacked conspecificyoung. Older nestlings(nine days old) were less vulnerable than three-day-old young. Our resultssuggest that nest-destroyingbehavior is inherent in all adult House Wrens but is inhibited in mated males and breeding females. It is suggestedthat nest destruction may have evolved as an interference mechanism reducing intra- and interspecific competition. Key words: House Wren; Troglodytes aedon; infanticide;nest destruction; competition. INTRODUCTION specificnestlings? (3) Is this behavior exhibited Destruction of eggs by small passerinesis a throughout the breeding season?(4) Do indi- relatively rare phenomenon which has been vidual House Wrens destroy neststhroughout observed mainly in members of two families, their breeding cycle? (5) How widespread is the Troglodytidae and Mimidae. Species this behavior among individuals from a pop- known to destroy eggsinclude the Marsh Wren ulation? (6) Is this behavior a local phenom- (Cistothoruspalustris; Allen 19 14); House enon or is it characteristic of all House Wren Wren (Troglodytesaedon; Sherman 1925, populations?(7) What is the adaptive value of Kendeigh 194 1); Cactus Wren (Campylorhyn- this behavior? thusbrunneicapillus; Anderson and Anderson METHODS 1973); SedgeWren (Cistothorusplatensis; Pic- man and Picman 1980); Bewick’s Wren This study was conducted at Presqu’ile Pro- (Thryomanesbewickii; J.
    [Show full text]
  • Troglodytidae Species Tree
    Troglodytidae I Rock Wren, Salpinctes obsoletus Canyon Wren, Catherpes mexicanus Sumichrast’s Wren, Hylorchilus sumichrasti Nava’s Wren, Hylorchilus navai Salpinctinae Nightingale Wren / Northern Nightingale-Wren, Microcerculus philomela Scaly-breasted Wren / Southern Nightingale-Wren, Microcerculus marginatus Flutist Wren, Microcerculus ustulatus Wing-banded Wren, Microcerculus bambla ?Gray-mantled Wren, Odontorchilus branickii Odontorchilinae Tooth-billed Wren, Odontorchilus cinereus Bewick’s Wren, Thryomanes bewickii Carolina Wren, Thryothorus ludovicianus Thrush-like Wren, Campylorhynchus turdinus Stripe-backed Wren, Campylorhynchus nuchalis Band-backed Wren, Campylorhynchus zonatus Gray-barred Wren, Campylorhynchus megalopterus White-headed Wren, Campylorhynchus albobrunneus Fasciated Wren, Campylorhynchus fasciatus Cactus Wren, Campylorhynchus brunneicapillus Yucatan Wren, Campylorhynchus yucatanicus Giant Wren, Campylorhynchus chiapensis Bicolored Wren, Campylorhynchus griseus Boucard’s Wren, Campylorhynchus jocosus Spotted Wren, Campylorhynchus gularis Rufous-backed Wren, Campylorhynchus capistratus Sclater’s Wren, Campylorhynchus humilis Rufous-naped Wren, Campylorhynchus rufinucha Pacific Wren, Nannus pacificus Winter Wren, Nannus hiemalis Eurasian Wren, Nannus troglodytes Zapata Wren, Ferminia cerverai Marsh Wren, Cistothorus palustris Sedge Wren, Cistothorus platensis ?Merida Wren, Cistothorus meridae ?Apolinar’s Wren, Cistothorus apolinari Timberline Wren, Thryorchilus browni Tepui Wren, Troglodytes rufulus Troglo dytinae Ochraceous
    [Show full text]
  • Cryptic Speciation in a Holarctic Passerine Revealed by Genetic and Bioacoustic Analyses
    Molecular Ecology (2008) 17, 2691–2705 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.03769.x CBlackwell Publrishing Lytd ptic speciation in a Holarctic passerine revealed by genetic and bioacoustic analyses DAVID P. L. TOEWS and DARREN E. IRWIN Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, 6270 University Blvd., Vancouver, BC Canada V6T 1Z4 Abstract There has been much controversy regarding the timing of speciation events in birds, and regarding the relative roles of natural and sexual selection in promoting speciation. Here, we investigate these issues using winter wrens (Troglodytes troglodytes), an unusual example of a passerine with a Holarctic distribution. Geographical variation has led to speculation that the western North American form Troglodytes troglodytes pacificus might be a distinct biological species compared to those in eastern North America (e.g. Troglodytes troglodytes hiemalis) and Eurasia. We located the first known area in which both forms can be found, often inhabiting neighbouring territories. Each male wren in this area sings either western or eastern song, and the differences in song are as distinct in the contact zone as they are in allopatry. The two singing types differ distinctly in mitochondrial DNA sequences and amplified fragment length polymorpism profiles. These results indicate that the two forms are reproductively isolated to a high degree where they co-occur and are therefore separate species. DNA variation suggests that the initial split between the two species occurred before the Pleistocene, quite long ago for sister species in the boreal forest. Surprisingly, the two forms are similar in morphometric traits and habitat characteristics of territories. These findings suggest that sexual selection played a larger role than habitat divergence in generating reproductive isolation, and raise the possibility that there are other such morphologically cryptic species pairs in North America.
    [Show full text]
  • Diel Fledging Patterns Among Grassland Passerines: Relative Impacts of Energetics and Predation Risk
    Volume 135, 2018, pp. 1100–1112 DOI: 10.1642/AUK-17-213.1 RESEARCH ARTICLE Diel fledging patterns among grassland passerines: Relative impacts of energetics and predation risk Christine A. Ribic,1* Christoph S. Ng,2 Nicola Koper,2 Kevin Ellison,3 Pamela J. Pietz,4 and David J. Rugg5 1 U.S. Geological Survey, Wisconsin Cooperative Wildlife Research Unit, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA 2 Natural Resources Institute, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada 3 Northern Great Plains Program, World Wildlife Fund, Bozeman, Montana, USA 4 U.S. Geological Survey (emeritus), Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center, Jamestown, North Dakota, USA 5 U.S. Forest Service, Research and Development, Madison, Wisconsin, USA * Corresponding author: [email protected] Submitted November 6, 2017; Accepted July 3, 2018; Published September 12, 2018 ABSTRACT The time of day that nestlings fledge from a nest is thought to be shaped by predation risk and energetics. To minimize predation risk, fledging is predicted to start as early in the day as possible so that nestlings can maximize time outside the nest to find a safe place to stay before nightfall. Fledging times are predicted to be tightly grouped and to not be affected by the number of nestlings, given that all nestlings are responding to the same relative risk of predation. Conversely, energetic considerations predict that fledging time of day should vary so that nestlings can maximize energy intake before having to forage for themselves. However, data to evaluate the relative importance of these drivers in grassland birds are scarce because of the difficulty of observing nestlings as they fledge.
    [Show full text]