Think Environment - Vote for a the Process

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Think Environment - Vote for a the Process S316 29/3/05 1:59 pm Page 1 “green alliance... issue spring 05 10 “Do the parties have “We will set a long- “If well managed by five million green term goal of zero politicians and voters to woo?” municipal waste.” business, climate protection makes economic sense.” TRACK 6 INSIDE 9 14 LEADING FROM THE FRONT Reconciling the UK’s aspirations for international leadership with delivery at home S316 29/3/05 1:59 pm Page 2 TRACK INSIDE comment The quarterly magazine of Green Alliance Edited by Karen Crane Designed by Carruthers and Hobbs Ltd Printed by Seacourt Press Ltd © April 2005 Green Alliance All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Green Russell Marsh Alliance. Within the UK, exceptions are allowed head of policy in respect of any fair dealing for the purposes of private research or study, or criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright, Design and Patent Act, 1988, or in the case of reprographic reproduction in accordance with the terms of the We are fast approaching the next general election. In fact with the stream licences issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency. of announcements emerging from all the political parties it feels as if we are already in election mode even though, at the time of writing, the date has yet to be officially announced. Produced with support from the Esmée Fairbairn Foundation and Defra’s Environmental Action Fund. Green Alliance has been working hard to get the environment into the election debate and in this edition of Inside Track you can read more about our pledge campaign with a coalition of eight other environment groups. We also hear from the environment spokespeople of the three main political parties. The UK has begun its presidency of the G8 and, in July this year, we will take up the EU presidency. The prime minister is making climate change a major element of the G8 presidency and it will more than likely be a key issue for the EU presidency. Decisions will be needed on the structure of the second phase of the EU Emissions Trading Scheme and on the EU’s approach to negotiations on international climate policy post-Kyoto. contents Given the UK’s key role in the international arena over the next 12 months we have asked two observers from across the channel to give their views comment 2 on how the UK has performed at a European and International level and the Green Alliance news main challenges as they see it. Anje Köhne from Germanwatch gives her return to sender 3 perspective on the path the UK needs to negotiate through the changing climate policy 4 presidencies to deliver meaningful international action on climate change. designing for water efficiency 5 Tony Long, from WWF in Brussels, looks at European development policy and the opportunity to integrate sustainable principles more deeply into think environment - vote for a the process. better future 6 a top priority The past three months have seen a whirl of activity for Green Alliance. We Elliot Morley 8 launched three new reports, on water, waste and energy policy, all of which at the heart of a vision for Britain are featured in this issue. We had the pleasure of joining with old friends Norman Baker 9 and new to celebrate our first 25 years at the Science Museum in February. The next year promises to be just as full and you can view our finalised a moral duty Tim Yeo 10 work programme for 2005-06 now at www.green-alliance.org.uk all change for european development policy? Tony Long 11 mind the gap Anja Köhne 14 The views of contributors are not necessarily those of Green Alliance. S316 29/3/05 1:59 pm Page 3 return to sender A new agenda for the UK on integrated product policy Return to Sender: Producer responsibility and between this and the current situation. If the UK product policy was published in March, the final could bridge the gap, we would become an report of our sustainability through producer international leader in this field. responsibility project. This was supported by the DTI’s Sustainable Technologies Initiative, Biffa, The government needs to develop and build British Retail Consortium, BT plc, Sainsbury’s and consensus on objectives for a ‘closed-loop’ Unilever. It was launched jointly with the economy and build new institutions to help move Associate Parliamentary Sustainable Waste towards these objectives. Group’s complementary report on producer responsibility. Business must adopt responsibility for understanding and addressing the full impacts of Return to Sender explores the role producer its products. To create incentives for business responsibility can play in meeting more there must be the threat of less flexible ambitious waste and resource objectives. legislation if voluntary measures don’t deliver and public procurement must be used to drive the market for better products. Other measures are also needed, such as virgin materials taxes and minimum recycled content, to provide a market pull and support action for resource efficient products. We will build on the themes of this work in a new three-year project sponsored by Defra’s Environmental Action Fund, Closing the loop: transforming UK resource use and delivering a sustainable resource economy, starting in April. Measures, like the EU packaging directive, are reasonably successful in driving higher recycling, For more details of this work please contact but, overall, the problems of packaging and Ben Shaw [email protected] waste continue to grow. The hope was that producer responsibility would lead to the Return to Sender: Producer responsibility and extensive re-design of products to make them product policy is available to download as a less wasteful, both in their manufacture and in summary and full report from Green Alliance’s their use. But there is little sign that existing website. The summary report is also available as measures, or forthcoming ones on electronic a hard copy from Green Alliance, price £5. equipment and cars, will have that effect. We urgently need a broader interpretation of ‘producer responsibility’ where companies strive to understand the impacts of their products from cradle to grave, and even consider whether some products are just too environmentally damaging to put on the market. This is the new agenda of ‘integrated product policy’, but there is a big gap “3 S316 29/3/05 1:59 pm Page 4 changing climate policy Green Alliance is working to unlock the political barriers to tackling climate change Climate change has been high on the We continue to add our voice to the energy efficiency. We continue to push political agenda during the first few debate about the future direction of UK the recommendations of our report months of this year. The government climate policy with the publication of A Micro-generation Manifesto, using made yet another announcement our report Business Action on Climate our energy entrepreneurs network to about the structure of the UK’s Change: Where next after emissions feed into the development of DTI’s National Action Plan as part of the EU trading?. micro-generation strategy. Emissions Trading Scheme; a major climate science conference was held in Produced in partnership with the Our energy efficiency project is in its Exeter; and the Kyoto Protocol finally Institute for European Environmental final stages and is developing came into force after several years of Policy, the report reviews the various proposals around a suite of policy ongoing uncertainty about its future. incentives that have been put in place measures that we believe will unlock to encourage business and industry to current barriers to greater energy reduce their carbon dioxide emissions. efficiency. We reveal a very confusing picture. For more information contact Russell Some measures, like the Renewables Marsh, [email protected] Obligation, seem to be working well, yet others, like the Climate Change Business Action on Climate Change: Levy, are just not strong enough to Where next after emissions trading? have much effect on business is available from Green Alliance, decisions. price £20. We conclude that the EU emissions trading scheme, the centrepiece of the government’s climate policy, will not be strong enough to persuade business to reduce their carbon emissions, meaning that additional measures are needed to really drive action in this area. This forms part of our input to the government’s Climate Change Programme Review, alongside our other work on micro-generation and “4 S316 29/3/05 1:59 pm Page 5 In the face of massive new There are plenty of new technologies around, but builders have been development in the south reticent to take them on board. Despite east, joined-up action is the fact that research shows that installing water efficient technologies needed now to save water in buildings achieves as much as a 20 per cent reduction in water consumption. Our report makes the following recommendations: • revise building regulations to include water efficiency standards; • clear policy through the planning system to enforce greater water efficiency on developers, planners and local authorities; • mandatory labelling of water fixtures and fittings, similar to the energy label, and regulatory underpinning for the Sustainable Code for Buildings; • better enforcement of building regulations and empowerment for local authorities to demand water efficiency; • fiscal incentives such as VAT and stamp duty reductions, along with inclusion of water efficiency in the Green Landlords Scheme; • universal water metering to provide customers with the opportunity to manage their own water use and save money on bills Although the government has a number of policies covering water Without government action and greater efficiency, joined up action is needed if incentives for consumers, the south the planned development in the south east is likely to suffer extreme water east is to be sustainable.
Recommended publications
  • Windfall Tax Campaign Toolkit ‘A Windfall for Social and Environmental Justice’
    cDIREoCTIONmFOR THE pass DEMOCRATIC LEFT February 2009 Windfall Tax Campaign Toolkit ‘A windfall for social and environmental justice’ By Gemma Tumelty & Jenna Khalfan Windfall Tax Campaign Toolkit Introduction & Contents Rising energy and fuel prices are affecting everyone but it's the poorest and those on fixed incomes who are paying the heaviest price for the essentials of life - light and heat. This situation is unsustainable and should be challenged. Compass believes that the moment is right for the government to levy a sensible one off windfall tax on the energy and oil companies to guarantee social and environmental justice for the common good of people living today and for future generations. The government can move quickly and decisively now - but it needs to know that this is what the people want. We have developed a toolkit to help you campaign locally and nationally to have your say in this important debate. Contents 1. Briefing questions and answers 2. Key statistics 3. Campaign aims and actions 4. What you can do locally a. Get local Labour Party, Students’ Union and trade union support b. How to Lobby your MP c. Local media d. energy companies 5. Building a local coalition: pensioners groups, anti-poverty groups, church groups, fuel poverty groups, single parent networks etc Appendix 1. Who supports a windfall tax 2. Model letter to MPs 3. Model letter to the Chancellor Windfall Tax Campaign Toolkit www.compassonline.org.uk PAGE 1 1. Briefing questions agreed to raise this to a £150 million a be particularly targeted at families in or and answers year by 2010, with the rate of price rises facing fuel poverty.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Crime: Wildlife Crime
    House of Commons Environmental Audit Committee Environmental Crime: Wildlife Crime Twelfth Report of Session 2003–04 Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed Wednesday 15 September 2004 HC 605 Published on Thursday 7 October 2004 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £22.00 The Environmental Audit Committee The Environmental Audit Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to consider to what extent the policies and programmes of government departments and non-departmental public bodies contribute to environmental protection and sustainable development; to audit their performance against such targets as may be set for them by Her Majesty’s Ministers; and to report thereon to the House. Current membership Mr Peter Ainsworth MP (Conservative, East Surrey) (Chairman) Mr Gregory Barker MP (Conservative, Bexhill and Battle) Mr Harold Best MP (Labour, Leeds North West) Mr Colin Challen MP (Labour, Morley and Rothwell) Mr David Chaytor MP (Labour, Bury North) Mrs Helen Clark MP (Labour, Peterborough) Sue Doughty MP (Liberal Democrat, Guildford) Mr Paul Flynn MP (Labour, Newport West) Mr Mark Francois MP (Conservative, Rayleigh) Mr John Horam MP (Conservative, Orpington) Mr John McWilliam MP (Labour, Blaydon) Mr Elliot Morley MP (Labour, Scunthorpe) Mr Malcolm Savidge MP (Labour, Aberdeen North) Mr Simon Thomas MP (Plaid Cymru, Ceredigion) Joan Walley MP (Labour, Stoke-on-Trent North) David Wright MP (Labour, Telford) Powers The constitution and powers are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally Standing Order No. 152A. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk.
    [Show full text]
  • Keeping the Lights On: Nuclear, Renewables and Climate Change
    House of Commons Environmental Audit Committee Keeping the lights on: Nuclear, Renewables and Climate Change Sixth Report of Session 2005–06 Volume II Oral and Written Evidence Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed Tuesday 28 March 2006 HC 584-II Published on Sunday 16 April 2006 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £24.00 The Environmental Audit Committee The Environmental Audit Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to consider to what extent the policies and programmes of government departments and non-departmental public bodies contribute to environmental protection and sustainable development; to audit their performance against such targets as may be set for them by Her Majesty’s Ministers; and to report thereon to the House. Current membership Mr Tim Yeo MP (Conservative, South Suffolk) (Chairman) Ms Celia Barlow, MP (Labour, Hove) Mr Martin Caton, MP (Labour, Gower) Mr Colin Challen, MP (Labour, Morley and Rothwell) Mr David Chaytor, MP (Labour, Bury North) Ms Lynne Featherstone, MP (Liberal Democrat, Hornsey and Wood Green) Mr David Howarth, MP (Liberal Democrat, Cambridge) Mr Nick Hurd, MP (Conservative, Ruislip Northwood) Mr Elliot Morley MP (Labour, Scunthorpe) [ex-officio] Mr Mark Pritchard, MP (Conservative, Wrekin, The) Mrs Linda Riordan, MP (Labour, Halifax) Mr Graham Stuart, MP (Conservative, Beverley & Holderness) Ms Emily Thornberry, MP (Labour, Islington South & Finsbury) Dr Desmond Turner, MP (Labour, Brighton, Kempton) Mr Ed Vaizey, MP (Conservative, Wantage) Joan Walley MP (Labour, Stoke-on-Trent North) Powers The constitution and powers are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally Standing Order No.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix: “Ideology, Grandstanding, and Strategic Party Disloyalty in the British Parliament”
    Appendix: \Ideology, Grandstanding, and Strategic Party Disloyalty in the British Parliament" August 8, 2017 Appendix Table of Contents • Appendix A: Wordscores Estimation of Ideology • Appendix B: MP Membership in Ideological Groups • Appendix C: Rebellion on Different Types of Divisions • Appendix D: Models of Rebellion on Government Sponsored Bills Only • Appendix E: Differences in Labour Party Rebellion Following Leadership Change • Appendix F: List of Party Switchers • Appendix G: Discussion of Empirical Model Appendix A: Wordscores Estimation of Ideology This Appendix describes our method for ideologically scaling British MPs using their speeches on the welfare state, which were originally produced for a separate study on welfare reform (O'Grady, 2017). We cover (i) data collection, (ii) estimation, (iii) raw results, and (iv) validity checks. The resulting scales turn out to be highly valid, and provide an excellent guide to MPs' ideologies using data that is completely separate to the voting data that forms the bulk of the evidence in our paper. A1: Collection of Speech Data Speeches come from an original collection of every speech made about issues related to welfare in the House of Commons from 1987-2007, covering the period over which the Labour party moved 1 to the center under Tony Blair, adopted and enacted policies of welfare reform, and won office at the expense of the Conservatives. Restricting the speeches to a single issue area is useful for estimating ideologies because with multiple topics there is a danger of conflating genuine extremism (a tendency to speak in extreme ways) with a tendency or requirement to talk a lot about topics that are relatively extreme to begin with (Lauderdale and Herzog, 2016).
    [Show full text]
  • Visiting Parliamentary Fellowship Celebrating 25 Years 1994-2019
    VISITING PARLIAMENTARY FELLOWSHIP CELEBRATING 25 YEARS 1994-2019 St Antony's College 1 Roger Goodman, Warden of St Antony’s At a recent breakfast with the students, it was decided that the College should do more to advertise what distinguished it from other colleges in Oxford. St Antony’s is: The Oxford college founded by a Frenchman The Oxford college with two Patron Saints (St Antony of Egypt and St Antony of Padua) The Oxford college where almost 90% of the 500 graduate students are from outside UK and the alumni come from 129 countries The Oxford college with international influence: ‘In the mid-2000s, 5% of the world’s foreign ministers had studied at St Antony’s’ (Nick Cohen, The Guardian, 8 Nov, 2015) The Oxford college mentioned in the novels of both John Le Carré and Robert Harris The Oxford college which holds the most weekly academic seminars and workshops The Oxford college with two award-winning new buildings in the past decade To this list can be added: St Antony’s is the Oxford college with a Visiting Parliamentary Fellowship (VPF). There is no other Oxford college that can boast such a list of parliamentarians responsible for a seminar programme over such a long period of time. The College is immensely proud of the Fellowship and greatly indebted to all those who have held it over the past 25 years. We were very grateful to those who have were able to come to the 25th anniversary celebration of the Fellowship programme at the House of Commons on 24 April 2019 and for the many generous letters from those who could not.
    [Show full text]
  • Ull History Centre: U DMY
    Hull History Centre: U DMY U DMY Records of Elliot Morley MP c.1988-1994 Accession number: 1996/01 Historical Background/Biographical Background: Elliot Anthony Morley was born in Liverpool on 6 July 1952. He attended St Margaret's C of E High School in south Liverpool and received a BEd from Hull College of Education. He was a teacher for twelve years (1975- 1987) rising to the post of Head of Special Needs at Greatfield High School in Hull. He married Patricia Hunt in 1975 in Hull where he was a Labour Councillor representing the Drypool Ward (1979-1986) where he served as Chair of the City's Transport Committee. He represented the Labour Party as MP for Glanford and Scunthorpe (1987-1997) and then Scunthorpe (1997-2010). He was an active campaigner on environmental issues having been Shadow Minister for Fisheries, Countryside & Animal Welfare (1989-1997) he then served as Fisheries Minister (1997-2003) and then Minister for Environment and Climate Change (2003-2006), he also served as Chairman of the Energy and Climate Change Select Committee. He left this post and was expelled from the Privy Council in April 2011 and stripped of his Honorary Fellowship from the Institution of Civil Engineers due to the expenses scandal. In 2009, he was accused by The Daily Telegraph of continuing to claim Parliamentary expenses for a mortgage that had already been repaid. Morley was prosecuted and in April 2011 pleaded guilty in the Crown Court at Southwark to two counts of false accounting, involving over £30,000. On 20 May 2011, he was sentenced to 16 months imprisonment and was released from prison on 20 September 2011 having served one-quarter of his sentence.
    [Show full text]
  • Former Members Sentenced to Imprisonment
    House of Commons Committee on Standards and Privileges Former Members sentenced to imprisonment Sixteenth Report of Session 2010–12 Report and Appendix, together with formal minutes Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 14 June 2011 HC 1215 Published on 15 June 2011 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The Committee on Standards and Privileges The Committee on Standards and Privileges is appointed by the House of Commons to oversee the work of the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards; to examine the arrangements proposed by the Commissioner for the compilation, maintenance and accessibility of the Register of Members’ Interests and any other registers of interest established by the House; to review from time to time the form and content of those registers; to consider any specific complaints made in relation to the registering or declaring of interests referred to it by the Commissioner; to consider any matter relating to the conduct of Members, including specific complaints in relation to alleged breaches in the Code of Conduct which have been drawn to the Committee’s attention by the Commissioner; and to recommend any modifications to the Code of Conduct as may from time to time appear to be necessary. Current membership Rt hon Kevin Barron MP (Labour, Rother Valley) (Chair) Sir Paul Beresford MP (Conservative, Mole Valley) Tom Blenkinsop MP (Labour, Middlesbrough South & East Cleveland) Annette Brooke MP (Liberal Democrat, Mid Dorset and North Poole) Rt hon Tom Clarke MP (Labour, Coatbridge, Chryston and Bellshill) Mr Geoffrey Cox MP (Conservative, Torridge and West Devon) Matthew Hancock MP (Conservative, West Suffolk) Oliver Heald MP (Conservative, North East Hertfordshire) Heather Wheeler MP (Conservative, South Derbyshire) Dr Alan Whitehead MP (Labour, Southampton Test) Powers The constitution and powers of the Committee are set out in Standing Order No.
    [Show full text]
  • Brooke, Heather.Pdf
    City Research Online City, University of London Institutional Repository Citation: Brooke, H. (2016). Citizen or subject? Freedom of information and the informed citizen in a democracy. (Unpublished Doctoral thesis, City, University of London) This is the accepted version of the paper. This version of the publication may differ from the final published version. Permanent repository link: https://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/15961/ Link to published version: Copyright: City Research Online aims to make research outputs of City, University of London available to a wider audience. Copyright and Moral Rights remain with the author(s) and/or copyright holders. URLs from City Research Online may be freely distributed and linked to. Reuse: Copies of full items can be used for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge. Provided that the authors, title and full bibliographic details are credited, a hyperlink and/or URL is given for the original metadata page and the content is not changed in any way. City Research Online: http://openaccess.city.ac.uk/ [email protected] Citizen or Subject? Freedom of Information and the Informed Citizen in a Democracy Heather Brooke A dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by prior publication Department of Journalism City University London May 2016 2 3 Contents CONTENTS .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Part 3 of the 2005 Constitutional Reform Act (CRA)
    Barents Sea Norwegian Sea Atlantic Ocean Baltic Sea North Sea Bay of Biscay NATIONAL INTEGRITY SYSTEM ASSESSMENT UNITED KINGDOM Black Sea CORRUPTION IN THE UK: PART THREE Mediterranean Sea www.transparency.org.uk 0 210 420 Miles 0 210 420 KM Transparency International (TI) is the global civil society organisation leading the fight against corruption. Through more than 90 chapters worldwide and an international secretariat in Berlin, TI raises awareness of the damaging effects of corruption and works with partners in government, business and civil society to develop and implement effective measures to tackle it Transparency International UK (TI-UK) is the UK chapter of TI. We raise awareness about corruption; advocate legal and regulatory reform at national and international levels; design practical tools for institutions, individuals and companies wishing to combat corruption; and act as a leading centre of anti-corruption expertise in the UK. Publisher: Transparency International UK Lead Researcher: Prof. Michael Macaulay, Teesside University Authors: Prof. Michael Macaulay, Teesside University (Chapters 2, 4, 5, 6 – 6.3, 6.5, 6.7, 6.8, 6.9, 6.12 – 7) Dr Gary Hickey, Teesside University (Chapters 3, 6 – 6.1, 6.2, 6.4, 6.6, 6.10, 6.11) Research review: Suzanne Mulcahy, Transparency International Secretariat Project Coordinators: Robert Barrington, Transparency International UK Paul Zoubkov, Transparency International Secretariat First published June 2011 This publication is a product of the European National Integrity Systems project. The National Integrity Systems assessment tool has been developed and coordinated by Transparency International. Reproduction in whole or in parts is permitted, providing that full credit is given to Transparency International and provided that any such reproduction, whether in whole or in parts, is not sold unless incorporated in other works.
    [Show full text]
  • Open House? the Impact of the Freedom of Information Act on Westminster
    Open House? The Impact of the Freedom of Information Act on Westminster Paper for the PSA Annual Conference April 2011 Gabrielle Bourke and Benjamin Worthy Email: [email protected] (Not to be quoted without the permission of the authors) Abstract This paper presents the findings of a two-year study into the impact of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 on the UK parliament, looking at how MPs and peers have used the Act and how it has impacted upon parliament. This paper examines the latter, asking if FOI has made both Houses, MPs and peers more accountable and transparent, increased public understanding of parliament, public participation and trust. The findings represent some preliminary conclusions from our study, due to finish in July 2011. FOI has made parliament more accountable and transparent. It has increased understanding on a low level, particularly parliamentary activities but has had no effect on participation and none on trust. Despite concerns, it has had no impact on privilege. The discussion of FOI is dominated by expenses and here a combination of resistance, an opaque system, parliamentary culture and its special governance structure meant the crisis was particularly severe. FOI has led to major changes in parliament, particularly with the creation of IPSA, as well as several lesser changes. Introduction: transparency, openness and parliament Freedom of information laws can bring a range of benefits. Supporters hope FOI can bring increased transparency and accountability, leading in turn to better understanding of government, increased public participation and increased trust (Darch and Underwood, 2010; Hazell, Worthy, and Glover, 2010).
    [Show full text]
  • JUDGMENT R V Chaytor and Others (Appellants)
    Michaelmas Term [2010] UKSC 52 On appeal from: 2010 EWCA Crim 1910 JUDGMENT R v Chaytor and others (Appellants) before Lord Phillips, President Lord Hope, Deputy President Lord Rodger Lady Hale Lord Brown Lord Mance Lord Collins Lord Kerr Lord Clarke REASONS GIVEN ON 1 December 2010 FOR THE ORDER MADE ON 10 November 2010 Heard on 18 and 19 October 2010 First Appellant Second Appellant Nigel Pleming QC Edward Fitzgerald QC Julian Knowles Joseph Middleton (Instructed by Steel & (Instructed by Steel & Shamash Solicitors) Shamash Solicitors) Third Appellant Respondent Nigel Pleming QC Lord Pannick QC Rebecca Trowler Louis Mably James Segan (Instructed by Steel & (Instructed by Crown Shamash Solicitors) Prosecution Service Special Crime Division) Intervener (written submissions) Alun Jones QC Rupert Bowers (Instructed by Keystone Law Limited) LORD PHILLIPS Introduction 1. Each of the appellants has been committed for trial at the Crown Court on charges of false accounting. I shall refer to them as “the defendants”. The charges relate to claims in respect of parliamentary expenses and are alleged to have been committed when each defendant was a serving member of the House of Commons. A fourth defendant, Lord Hanningfield, who is a member of the House of Lords, faces similar charges. Each defendant and Lord Hanningfield is facing a separate trial but each of them has raised an important point of law. Each claims that criminal proceedings cannot be brought against him because they infringe parliamentary privilege. A single preparatory hearing pursuant to section 29 of the Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996 was held to consider this point in relation to all four defendants.
    [Show full text]
  • Top Ten Most Notorious Expenses Claims
    TOP TEN MOST NOTORIOUS EXPENSES CLAIMS 1. Elliot Morley (Lab, Scunthorpe) Elliot Morley claimed more than £16,000 for a mortgage which had been paid off. 2. David Chaytor (Lab, Bury North) David Chaytor was another MP who stands accused of improperly claiming expenses for a property he owned outright, receiving almost £13,000 in all. 3. Jim Devine (Lab, Livingston) Jim Devine is suspected of submitting false invoices to claim £3,240 for cleaning services and £5,505 for stationery. 4. Douglas Hogg (Con, Sleaford and North Hykeham) Douglas Hogg infamously included the £2,115 cost of having his moat cleared in his expenses. The MP had come to a special arrangement with the fees office under which he provided a list of the costs of running his estate, which were greatly in excess of the maximum second home allowance, and he was paid one twelfth of the maximum each month. The ten-page costs letter included the moat, piano tuning, £18,000 a year for a full-time gardener, £671 for a mole-catcher and around £200 a year for maintenance of an Aga oven. 5. Margaret Moran (Lab, Luton South) Margaret Moran renovated three properties at the taxpayers’ expense – including a £22,500 course of dry rot treatment at a seaside house a hundred miles from her constituency – by repeatedly ‘flipping’ her second home designation. 6. Julie Kirkbride (Con, Bromsgrove) and Andrew MacKay (Con, Bracknell) As married MPs, Andrew MacKay and Julie Kirkbride were both entitled to claim additional costs allowance. However, the couple chose to designate different properties as their second homes.
    [Show full text]