DOCSLIB.ORG

Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions with Bus Rapid Transit and Non-Motorized Transport”

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions with Bus Rapid Transit and Non-Motorized Transport” Terminal Evaluation of the UN Environment Project “Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions with Bus Rapid Transit and Non-Motorized Transport” Terminal Evaluation of the UN Environment-GEF Project “Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions with Bus Rapid Transit and Non-Motorized Transport” Final report Evaluation Office of UN Environment April 2018 1 Terminal Evaluation of the UN Environment Project “Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions with Bus Rapid Transit and Non-Motorized Transport” Evaluation Office of UN Environment Photos Credits: Front cover: Roland Wong Page 47-48, 53, 56: Roland Wong @UN Environment/(Roland Wong), UN Environment Evaluation Mission (2018) Page 58: Courtesy of TransCaribe Community Outreach Group This report has been prepared by independent consultant evaluators and is a product of the Evaluation Office of UN Environment. The findings and conclusions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect the views of Member States or the UN Environment Senior Management. For further information on this report, please contact: Evaluation Office of UN Environment P. O. Box 30552-00100 GPO Nairobi Kenya Tel: (254-20) 762 3389 Email: [email protected] (Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions with Bus Rapid Transit and Non-Motorized Transport) (GEF Project ID 1917) (04/2018) All rights reserved. © (2018) Evaluation Office of UN Environment 2 Terminal Evaluation of the UN Environment Project “Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions with Bus Rapid Transit and Non-Motorized Transport” ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This Terminal evaluation was prepared for the Evaluation Office of UN Environment by Mr. Roland Wong, Climate Change Mitigation Specialist as the Evaluation Consultant. The report benefits from a peer review conducted within Evaluation Office of UN Environment. The Evaluation Office of UN Environment would like to thank the BRT Project teams and in particular, the BRT Project team in Dar es Salaam (Dar Rapid Transit Agency, Dar es Salaam City Council, Tanzania National Roads Agency, and the World Bank Group in Dar es Salaam), and the BRT Project team in Cartagena (the Technological University of Bolivar in Cartagena, TransCaribe, Transambiental, Ciudatos and Despacio) for their contribution and collaboration throughout the Evaluation process. Sincere appreciation is also expressed to other project stakeholders in Columbia, Dar es Salaam and other locations who took time to provide comments to the draft report. The Evaluation Office of UN Environment would also like to thank the Institute for Transportation and Development Policy (namely the Africa Program and Latin America Region) as well as colleagues at the Climate and Technology Branch and the Air Quality and Mobility Unit of UN Environment in Nairobi. Evaluation team Roland Wong – Evaluation Consultant Evaluation Office of UN Environment Saila Toikka – Evaluation Manager Mela Shah – Evaluation Programme Assistant 3 Terminal Evaluation of the UN Environment Project “Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions with Bus Rapid Transit and Non-Motorized Transport” ABOUT THE EVALUATION1 Joint Evaluation: No Report Language(s): English Evaluation Type: Terminal Project Evaluation Brief Description: This report is a terminal evaluation of a UN Environment-GEF project implemented between 2005 and 2016. The project aimed to increase overall knowledge of planning, designing and implementing Bus Rapid Transit systems in cities in developing countries, and reduce GHG emissions from the transport sector globally. The evaluation sought to assess project performance (in terms of relevance, effectiveness and efficiency), and determine outcomes and impacts (actual and potential) stemming from the project, including their sustainability. The evaluation has two primary purposes: (i) to provide evidence of results to meet accountability requirements, and (ii) to promote learning, feedback, and knowledge sharing through results and lessons learned among UN Environment, the GEF and their executing partner ITDP and the relevant agencies of the project participating countries. Key words: Project Evaluation; Climate Change; TE; Terminal Evaluation; GEF; GEF Project; Transportation; Bus Rapid Transit; Non-motorized Transit 1 This data is used to aid the internet search of this report on the Evaluation Office of UN Environment Website 4 Terminal Evaluation of the UN Environment Project “Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions with Bus Rapid Transit and Non-Motorized Transport” Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................... 9 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. 14 1.1 EVALUATION OBJECTIVES ....................................................................................................................... 14 1.2 EVALUATION APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................... 14 1.3 MAIN EVALUATION CRITERIA AND QUESTIONS ........................................................................................... 15 2 PROJECT BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................... 17 2.1 CONTEXT .............................................................................................................................................. 17 2.2 PROJECT OBJECTIVES AND COMPONENTS ............................................................................................... 21 2.2.1 Objectives ...................................................................................................................................... 21 2.2.2 Components .................................................................................................................................. 22 2.3 TARGET AREAS/GROUPS........................................................................................................................ 22 2.4 MILESTONES IN PROJECT DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION ......................................................................... 24 2.5 IMPLEMENTATION ARRANGEMENTS AND PROJECT PARTNERS ................................................................... 24 2.6 PROJECT FINANCING ............................................................................................................................. 25 2.7 CHANGES IN DESIGN DURING IMPLEMENTATION ........................................................................................ 25 2.8 RECONSTRUCTED THEORY OF CHANGE OF THE PROJECT ........................................................................... 26 3 EVALUATION FINDINGS ................................................................................................................ 32 3.1 STRATEGIC RELEVANCE ......................................................................................................................... 32 3.1.1 Alignment with UN Environment’s strategy, policies and mandate ............................................. 32 3.1.2 Alignment with GEF focal areas and strategic priorities .............................................................. 33 3.1.3 Relevance to global, regional and national environmental issues and needs and complementarity to other interventions .................................................................................................... 34 3.2 QUALITY OF PROJECT DESIGN ................................................................................................................ 35 3.3 NATURE OF EXTERNAL CONTEXT ............................................................................................................ 38 3.4 EFFECTIVENESS ..................................................................................................................................... 39 3.4.1 Delivery of Outputs for Component 1: Dar es Salaam BRT .......................................................... 39 3.4.2 Achievement of Outputs for Component 2: Cartagena BRT system ........................................... 42 3.4.3 Achievement of Outputs for Component 3: BRT Planning Guide ................................................ 44 3.4.4 Achievement of direct outcomes as defined in the reconstructed TOC ...................................... 44 3.4.5 Likelihood of impact ...................................................................................................................... 54 3.5 FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT ...................................................................................................................... 65 3.5.1 Completeness of project financial information ............................................................................ 65 3.5.2 Communication between finance and project management staff .............................................. 65 3.6 EFFICIENCY ........................................................................................................................................... 66 3.6.1 Timeliness ..................................................................................................................................... 66 3.6.2 Cost Efficiencies ............................................................................................................................ 67 3.7 MONITORING AND REPORTING ................................................................................................................ 67 3.7.1 Monitoring design and budgeting ................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • April 2018 Floods in Dar Es Salaam
    Policy Research Working Paper 8976 Public Disclosure Authorized Wading Out the Storm The Role of Poverty in Exposure, Vulnerability Public Disclosure Authorized and Resilience to Floods in Dar Es Salaam Alvina Erman Mercedeh Tariverdi Marguerite Obolensky Xiaomeng Chen Rose Camille Vincent Silvia Malgioglio Jun Rentschler Public Disclosure Authorized Stephane Hallegatte Nobuo Yoshida Public Disclosure Authorized Global Facility of Disaster Reduction and Recovery August 2019 Policy Research Working Paper 8976 Abstract Dar es Salaam is frequently affected by severe flooding caus- income on average. Surprisingly, poorer households are ing destruction and impeding daily life of its 4.5 million not over-represented among the households that lost the inhabitants. The focus of this paper is on the role of pov- most - even in relation to their income, possibly because 77 erty in the impact of floods on households, focusing on percent of total losses were due to asset losses, with richer both direct (damage to or loss of assets or property) and households having more valuable assets. Although indirect indirect (losses involving health, infrastructure, labor, and losses were relatively small, they had significant well-be- education) impacts using household survey data. Poorer ing effects for the affected households. It is estimated that households are more likely to be affected by floods; directly households’ losses due to the April 2018 flood reached more affected households are more likely female-headed and than US$100 million, representing between 2–4 percent of have more insecure tenure arrangements; and indirectly the gross domestic product of Dar es Salaam. Furthermore, affected households tend to have access to poorer qual- poorer households were less likely to recover from flood ity infrastructure.
    [Show full text]
  • National Environment Management Council (Nemc)
    NATIONAL ENVIRONMENT MANAGEMENT COUNCIL (NEMC) NOTICE TO COLLECT APPROVED AND SIGNED ENVIRONMENTAL CERTIFICATES Section 81 of the Environment Management Act, 2004 stipulates that any person, being a proponent or a developer of a project or undertaking of a type specified in Third Schedule, to which Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) is required to be made by the law governing such project or undertaking or in the absence of such law, by regulation made by the Minister, shall undertake or cause to be undertaken, at his own cost an environmental impact assessment study. The Environmental Management Act, (2004) requires also that upon completion of the review of the report, the National Environment Management Council (NEMC) shall submit recommendations to the Minister for approval and issuance of certificate. The approved and signed certificates are returned to NEMC to formalize their registration into the database before handing over to the Developers. Therefore, the National Environment Management Council (NEMC) is inviting proponents/developers to collect their approved and signed certificates in the categories of Environmental Impact Assessment, Environmental Audit, Variation and Transfer of Certificates, as well as Provisional Environmental Clearance. These Certificates can be picked at NEMC’s Head office at Plot No. 28, 29 &30-35 Regent Street, Mikocheni Announced by: Director General, National Environment Management Council (NEMC), Plot No. 28, 29 &30-35 Regent Street, P.O. Box 63154, Dar es Salaam. Telephone: +255 22 2774889, Direct line: +255 22 2774852 Mobile: 0713 608930/ 0692108566 Fax: +255 22 2774901, Email: [email protected] No Project Title and Location Developer 1. Construction of 8 storey Plus Mezzanine Al Rais Development Commercial/Residential Building at plot no 8 block Company Ltd, 67, Ukombozi Mtaa in Jangwani Ward, Ilala P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Boletín Técnico Encuesta De Transporte Urbano De Pasajeros (ETUP) Primer Trimestre De 2021
    Ciudad, fecha de publicación Ciudad, fecha de publicación Boletín Técnico Bogotá D.C. Encuesta de Transporte Urbano de Pasajeros (ETUP) 14 de mayo de 2021 Primer trimestre de 2021 Encuesta de Transporte Urbano de Pasajeros (ETUP) I Trimestre de 2021p Gráfico 1. Variación anual del número de pasajeros transportados 8 áreas metropolitanas y 15 ciudades I Trimestre de 2021 p Fuente: DANE, ETUP. P Cifra provisional Introducción Indicador de productividad Resultados generales Medidas de calidad Comportamiento en áreas metropolitanas Ficha metodológica Glosario COM-030-PD-001-r-004 V8 Boletín Técnico Encuesta de Transporte Urbano de Pasajeros (ETUP) Primer trimestre de 2021 INTRODUCCIÓN El Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística –DANE-, viene realizando desde 1965, la Encuesta de Transporte Urbano de Pasajeros –ETUP-, con el fin de obtener información estadística relacionada con este medio de transporte público. Hasta el 2006 se desarrolló en 23 ciudades capitales analizando el transporte público municipal prestado en el perímetro urbano. Actualmente la cobertura abarca 8 áreas metropolitanas (Barranquilla, Bogotá, Bucaramanga, Cali, Cúcuta, Manizales, Medellín, Pereira) y 15 ciudades del país. Mensualmente se recolecta y consolida información por tipo de vehículo y nivel de servicio; en lo referente al parque automotor se recoge información sobre viajes recorridos, kilómetros recorridos, pasajeros movilizados y tarifa diurna vigente. Las variables principales de la encuesta son el parque automotor y el número de pasajeros transportados por las empresas legalmente constituidas, que prestan el servicio de transporte y que tienen asociado el pago de una tarifa cuyo valor es determinado por las autoridades competentes (Secretaría de Tránsito y Transporte) en cada uno de los municipios.
    [Show full text]
  • A MIXED-USE and WALKABLE BOGOTÁ: a Transit-Oriented Strategy for the City’S First Fixed-Rail Public Transit Corridor
    A MIXED-USE AND WALKABLE BOGOTÁ: A Transit-Oriented Strategy for the City’s First Fixed-Rail Public Transit Corridor Cristina Calderón Restrepo A capstone thesis paper submitted to the Executive Director of the Urban & Regional Planning Program at Georgetown University’s School of Continuing Studies in partial fulfillment of the requirements for Master of Professional Studies in Urban & Regional Planning. Faculty Advisor: Harriet Tregoning Academic Advisor: Uwe S. Brandes © Copyright 2018 by Cristina Calderón Restrepo All Rights Reserved 1 ABSTRACT This project explores the creation of an urban planning framework to improve land use near metro stations in Bogotá. This framework will make the new proposed metro stations in Bogotá vibrant community places that attract new investment in housing, office, and retail development. The research looks at lessons-learned from previous transit systems like TransMilenio and how cities like Medellín, Washington, D.C., and Hong Kong have created vibrant and sustainable transit-oriented development (TOD) that Bogotá can replicate in its own way. This research is based on the public proposals for Metro, studies made by the city and multilateral development banks, existing research in other cities, and interviews with leading experts in the field. Through this research I advance new urban development options for Metro stations and their areas of influence. The paper recommends TOD strategies to make transit more democratic and to avoid future gentrification and displacement in station areas. KEYWORDS Transit Oriented Development, Metro, Bogotá, Public Transit, Mixed-Use Development, Health, Pollution, Sustainable Development, Walkable Urbanism, Colombia, Inter-American Development Bank, World Bank, Gentrification, Displacement, TransMilenio, Fixed-Rail RESEARCH QUESTIONS 1.
    [Show full text]
  • La Gobernanza Del Transporte Público Urbano
    21 (2) 2012: 85 - 96 Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá Dossier central La gobernanza del transporte público urbano: INDAGACIONES ALREDEDOR DE LOS METROCABLES DE MEDELLÍN* The Governance of Urban Public Transport: an Examination of Medellín’s Metrocables Julio D. Dávila Peter Brand PhD en Planificación y Economía Urbanas. Profesor, The PhD en Diseño Urbano. Profesor asociado, Escuela de Bartlett Faculty of the Built Environment, University College Planeación Urbano-Regional, Universidad Nacional London, Londres, Reino Unido. Colombo-Británico. de Colombia, sede Medellín. Colombo-Británico. [email protected] [email protected] Recibido: 08 de mayo de 2012 Aprobado: 11 de octubre de 2012 Resumen Abstract Resumo En este artículo se analiza la noción de In this article we examine the notion Neste artigo analisa-se a noção de “gobernanza” en sus dos vertientes principales, of “governance” in its two main meanings “governança” em seus dois vertentes prin- aplicada especialmente a los cables aéreos – as applied to the case of the aerial cable cipais, aplicada especialmente a os cabos Metrocables–, del segundo centro urbano de cars –“Metrocables”– in Colombia’s second aéreos –Metrocables–, do segundo centro Colombia, Medellín. En su primera acepción, la largest urban centre, Medellín. In its first urbano de Colômbia, Medellín. Em sua pri- gobernanza se plantea como “buen gobierno” meaning, governance is understood as meira acepção, a governança se planeja como basado en la actuación eficiente y transparente “good government” based on the
    [Show full text]
  • CUATRO CAPITALES Y Su Movilidad
    CUATRO CAPITALES Y su movilidad Pensamiento Urbano BOGOTÁ son dos de los factores con ma- dialogó con los Es el centro urbano más yor incidencia en la movilidad. La 1poblado de Colombia Encuesta de Percepción Ciudadana alcaldes de Bogotá, (8’080.734 habitantes, según las 2016, realizada por ‘Bogotá cómo Cali, Barranquilla y proyecciones del DANE). Su poten- vamos’, ofrece un dato sobre có- Cartagena sobre la cial demográfico y el hecho de tener mo es moverse por la capital de la más de un millón de vehículos par- República: 6 de cada 10 personas gestión en movilidad ticulares, según el Observatorio de manifiestan que están tardando y sus apuestas. Desarrollo Económico del Distrito, más tiempo en sus trayectos. CASOS COLOMBIANOS PU 44 / 45 APOYAMOS PROYECTOS SOSTENIBLES El Bulevar de la Avenida Colombia fue una transformación del espacio público, realizada hace cuatro Enrique Peñalosa, años en el corazón de Cali. alcalde de Bogotá FOTO: Archivo Semana - Diana Sánchez FOTO: Archivo Semana Maurice Armitage, alcalde de Cali. FOTO: Cortesía Alcaldía Mayor de Bogotá Mayor de Cortesía Alcaldía FOTO: FOTO: Archivo Semana - Luis Benavides Enrique Peñalosa Londoño, al- accidentes tránsito en los últimos excelente inversión, porque es la más calde mayor de la ciudad, asegura que cinco meses y la caída de este indica- sostenible ambiental, económica y “la movilidad en Bogotá está en un dor en un 17 por ciento, así como el socialmente”, concluye. punto de inflexión” y resalta la exis- aumento en la imposición de compa- tencia de un plan de acción que será rendos en 23 por ciento.
    [Show full text]
  • Transport Study Tour to Bogotá, Medellin and Pereira, Colombia
    Transport study tour to Bogotá, Medellin and Pereira, Colombia Transport Study Tour – Bogotá, Medellín and Pereira Table of Contents 1. Transport Study tour to Bogotá, Medellín and Pereira 4 2. About Despacio ........................................... 0 3. More details................................................ 0 4. Background of study tour topics of interest1 4.1. Urban regeneration .................................... 4 4.1.1. Key links to information about urban regeneration in Colombian cities: 4 4.2. Non-motorized transport............................ 5 4.2.1. Key links to information about non-motorized transport: 6 4.3. Sports and recreation linked to cycling initiatives 7 4.3.1. Key links to information about Ciclovia: ..... 8 4.4. Mass transit improvements ........................ 8 4.4.1. Transmilenio ............................................... 8 4.4.2. SIT-VA (Sistema Integrado de Transporte del Valle de Aburrá) 11 4.4.3. Megabús ................................................... 15 4.4.4. Key links to information about Mass transit improvements: 17 5. Languages of study tour............................ 18 6. Basic agenda for study tour ...................... 19 6.1. Suggested hotels and flights ..................... 20 6.2. Main study tour agenda: 12th– 16th April 2014 21 6.2.1. Medellin Schedule .................................... 21 6.2.2. Bogotá Schedule ....................................... 21 6.3. Pereira ...................................................... 23 6.4. Optional activities and visits ....................
    [Show full text]
  • WORKING PAPER February 2012
    REPORT ON INVESTIGATION OF DAR ES SALAAM’S INSTITUTIONAL ACTIVITIES RELATED TO CLIMATE CHANGE WORKING PAPER February 2012 KASSENGA, Gabriel (ARDHI University) MBULIGWE, Stephen (ARDHI University) The project is co-funded by European Union How to quote: Kassenga Gabriel, Mbuligwe Stephen “Report on Investigation of Dar es Salaam‘s Institutional Activities related to Climate Change” Working Paper, February 2012 Dae es Salaam: Ardhi University. Available at: http://www.planning4adaptation.eu/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ Table of Contents Figures IV Tables V Annexes VI Acknowledgements VII 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Background and Rationale of the ACC Dar Projectt 1 1.2 Objective and Purpose o the Study 1 1.3 Study Methodology 1 1.4 Scope and Organisation of the Report 2 2 Dar es Salaam City 3 2.1 Introduction 3 2.2 Dar es Salaam City Physical and Social-Economic Characteristics 3 2.3 Survey Findings 5 2.3.1 Names and Details of the Interviews 6 2.3.2 Age Distribution 6 2.3.3 Education Profile 6 2.3.4 Period of Service 7 2.3.5 Competence and Responsibilities 7 2.3.6 Relationship between Institutions 8 2.3.7 Strategies and Programs in PU 8 2.3.8 Specific Policies and Strategies for PU 9 2.3.9 Financial Resources 10 2.3.10 Facility Supply in the PU 10 2.3.11 Development Changes in the PU in Past Years 11 2.3.12 Main Linkage and Interdependencies between City Centre, PU and Rural Areas 11 2.3.13 Informal and Formal Groups, NGOs, CBOs and
    [Show full text]
  • Tramo 1 De La Primera Línea Del Metro Para Bogotá – Plmb
    TRAMO 1 DE LA PRIMERA LÍNEA DEL METRO PARA BOGOTÁ – PLMB HOJA DE TÉRMINOS ANEXO 1 EMPRESA METRO DE BOGOTÁ S.A ____________________________________________________ Bogotá D.C., 3 de abril de 2018 Documento no vinculante ÍNDICE 1. INTRODUCCIÓN ............................................................................................................................ 15 2. OBJETIVOS DEL PROYECTO ...................................................................................................... 15 3. CARACTERÍSTICAS GENERALES .............................................................................................. 16 3.1. LOCALIZACIÓN ......................................................................................................................... 17 3.2. DESCRIPCIÓN DE LAS OBRAS ............................................................................................... 18 3.3. CRITERIOS DE DISEÑO GENERALES DEL PROYECTO ....................................................... 19 3.3.1. CARACTERÍSTICAS DEL SERVICIO DE LA LÍNEA .......................................................................... 21 3.3.2. PARÁMETROS GENERALES DE DEFINICIÓN DE LAS INFRAESTRUCTURAS DE LA LÍNEA ................... 23 4. IDENTIFICACIÓN DE INTERFERENCIAS CON REDES E INFRAESTRUCTURA ..................... 24 4.1. TÚNELES, CANALES, PASOS DEPRIMIDOS .......................................................................... 24 4.2. PUENTES ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Diseño De Una Estrategia De Comunicación Basada En El Modelo C-Change Para El Sistema Integrado De Transporte Masivo Transmetro S.A.S
    Diseño de una Estrategia de Comunicación basada en el Modelo C-Change para el Sistema Integrado de Transporte Masivo Transmetro S.A.S. Barranquilla, Colombia. Presentado por: Sthefany Catherine Becerra Sánchez Lilibeth Marian Fuentes Arciniegas Trabajo de grado para optar por el título de Comunicador Social y Periodista Énfasis: Organizacional y Comunicación para el Desarrollo Tutor: Manuel Jair Vega Casanova Facultad de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades Universidad del Norte Carrera de Comunicación Social y Periodismo Barranquilla - Atlántico 2016 Mis más grandes y profundos agradecimientos a mis padres Álvaro Becerra y Patricia Sánchez por ser mi apoyo incondicional durante este proceso de formación. Son mi inspiración y mi ejemplo a seguir. Sin ustedes nada de esto hubiera sido posible. Sthefany Becerra Sánchez A mi mamá, Lilibeth Arciniegas, le agradezco por todo el amor que me ha dedicado por años, el apoyo tan valioso que siempre me ha brindado y por ayudarme a estar donde hoy estoy. A mi familia, por acompañarme en mis decisiones y a Luis Ángel Rodríguez, quien ha sido mi consejero y soporte, regalándome su amor y orgullo en triunfos como estos. Quiero dedicarle este gran logro a tres personas importantes, Juan Arciniegas, Carmen Silvera y Wilmer Fuentes, que aunque no me acompañan físicamente, sé que desde donde se encuentran, están orgullosos de mi. Lilibeth Fuentes Arciniegas Tabla de contenido 1. Introducción 2. Justificación ……………………………….……………………………………..……. 7 3. Planteamiento del problema y Antecedentes ………………………………………..… 10 3.1. Sistemas BRT en América Latina ………………………………………..….. 14 3.2. Sistemas Integrados de Transporte Masivo Colombia ……………………..... 15 3.3. Campañas y estrategias de Cultura Ciudadana en principales SITM de Colombia ……………………………………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • Case Study: Colombia's Bus Rapid Transit (BRT)
    Case Study: Colombia’s Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Development And Expansion An Analysis of barriers and critical enablers of Colombia’s BRT systems Produced for the Mitigation Action Implementation Network (MAIN) January 2012 Written by: Michael Turner Chuck Kooshian Steve Winkelman Supported by: German International Climate Initiative Dialogue. Insight. Solutions. Center for Clean Air Policy Air Clean for Center Colombia’s BRT Development and Expansion Acknowledgements This paper is a product of CCAP’s Mitigation Action Implementation Network (MAIN) and was written by Michael Turner, Chuck Kooshian, and Steve Winkelman of CCAP. This project is part of the International Climate Initiative. The Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety supports this initiative on the basis of a decision adopted by the German Bundestag. Special thanks are due to the individuals in Colombia who offered their time and assistance, through phone interviews or in-person discussions to help inform this work. They include Juan Jose Castillo Lugo and Julián Andrés Gómez of the Ministry of Transport, Sandra López and María Cecilia Concha of the Ministry of the Environment, Miguel Uribe of the Department of National Planning, Guillermo Herrera Castaño of the Ministry of Housing, Carlos Felipe Pardo of GIZ, and Oscar Diaz of GSD+. The views expressed in this paper represent those of CCAP and not necessarily those of any of the other institutions or individuals mentioned above. For further information, please contact Michael Turner ([email protected]).
    [Show full text]
  • Análisis Comparativo De Las Variables Oferta, Demanda E
    ANÁLISIS COMPARATIVO DE LAS VARIABLES OFERTA, DEMANDA E INFRAESTRUCTURA DEL SISTEMA DE TRANSPORTE PÚBLICO COLECTIVO URBANO ENTRE LAS CIUDADES DE BOGOTA Y MEDELLÍN ENTRE LOS AÑOS 2010 Y 2018. BERNAL DUARTE KAREN DANIELA. GUERRA PERALTA XENIA SIRITH. UNIVERSIDAD COOPERATIVA DE COLOMBIA. SEDE SANTA MARTA. FACULTAD DE INGENIERIA. INGENIERIA CIVIL. SANTA MARTA D.T.C.H. 2019 1 ANÁLISIS COMPARATIVO DE LAS VARIABLES OFERTA, DEMANDA E INFRAESTRUCTURA DEL SISTEMA DE TRANSPORTE PÚBLICO COLECTIVO URBANO ENTRE LAS CIUDADES DE BOGOTA Y MEDELLÍN ENTRE LOS AÑOS 2010 Y 2018. BERNAL DUARTE KAREN DANIELA. GUERRA PERALTA XENIA SIRITH. ANÁLISIS DE REVISIÓN LITERARIA, TRABAJO DE GRADO PARA OPTAR POR EL TÍTULO DE INGENIERO CIVIL. TUTOR DEL PROYECTO: INGENIERO FREDDY ARMANDO CUERVO LARA. UNIVERSIDAD COOPERATIVA DE COLOMBIA. SEDESANTA MARTA. FACULTAD DE INGENIERIA. INGENIERIA CIVIL. SANTA MARTA D.T.C.H. 2019 2 TABLA DE CONTENIDO. 1. RESUMEN ......................................................................................................................... 4 2. PALABRAS CLAVES: movilidad, oferta, demanda, infraestructura, estrategias. ........... 4 3. ABSTRAC .......................................................................................................................... 4 4. KEYWORDS: mobility, supply, demand, infrastructure, strategies. ................................. 4 5. INTRODUCCION .............................................................................................................. 5 6. OBJETIVOS ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]