DOCSLIB.ORG

' There's No Such Thing As Harmless Naughty Fun Lisa Nolland Ma Mcs Phd Convenor, the Msc, Anglican Mainstream

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
' There's No Such Thing As Harmless Naughty Fun Lisa Nolland Ma Mcs Phd Convenor, the Msc, Anglican Mainstream ‘ THERE’S NO SUCH THING AS HARMLESS NAUGHTY FUN LISA NOLLAND MA MCS PHD CONVENOR, THE MSC, ANGLICAN MAINSTREAM [email protected] ADDRESSING ISSUES AND DOING CAT: COUNTER ARGUMENT TRAINING 22 FEB 2020 WIMBLEDON INTRO • Huge topics but will start you off • Just make it work for you • Goal: To reclaim the Good Sex label. God made sex and it is GOOD! We unnecessarily concede the territory to Kinsey’s Opposition by allowing them to label us as the ‘Anti-sexers’: sad, sour, repressed, boring. AND WHO WANTS THAT REPUTATION? INTRO II • We start with psychological analysis of ‘harmless naughty fun’ and how we are influenced; followed by an exposé of Dr Alfred Kinsey, Father of the Sex Revolution • We then look at porn, CSE*, sex and Queer/Kink: some examples of ‘harmless naughty fun’ • Finally adults: protest this madness---ParentPower: https://parentpower.family/ is good---but also give your young the best, most accurate and scientific advice! WHY ARE WE HERE TODAY? A KEY REASON IS UK LEADERSHIP FACTORS HERE INCLUDE: • Worry of a ‘Kill-Joy’ reputation: ‘Puritanism - The haunting fear that someone, somewhere, may be happy.’ Powerfully effective (and false) caricature by HL Mencken • Past moral failure • Despairing capitulation • Not wanting to make things worse • Embarrassment: ‘Don’t ask, Don’t tell’ • Fear others will think one secretly relishes it! J. Butler A RELATED REASON: IGNORANCE OF BASIC CHILD DEVELOPMENT • ‘Children are like wet cement, whatever falls on them makes an impression’, H Ginott, child psychologist. Some sex ‘ed’ is pornographic, and yet parents don’t fuss! OR WE CAN UP OUR GAME, REALIZING THAT, WITH DOROTHY AND TOTO, ‘WE’RE NOT IN KANSAS ANYMORE!’ UPPING OUR GAME: NOTE HOW SEX IS SOLD TO A GULLIBLE PUBLIC BY MSM AND THE ESTABLISHMENT • Sex is infantilized: ‘Playboy’; ‘sex toys’; etc • Sex is shrunk: No big deal • By presenting it as a slightly mischievous, light-hearted ‘bit of fun’ • By minimizing/ignoring the massive short/long term damages and costs • By ignoring the more extreme sexual minorities waiting in the wings: ‘We’ve only just begun’. Stonewall does NOT include ‘all’ but gets away with it. Their claim to the moral high ground is a lie. UPPING OUR GAME: IDENTIFY THE HOOKS II • We all are manipulated by these myths. They include: ‘Everything interesting in life is illegal, immoral or fattening.’ Also see right: UPPING OUR GAME: IDENTIFY THE HOOKS III • ‘Imaginary evil is romantic and varied; real evil is gloomy, monotonous, barren, boring. Imaginary good is boring; real good is always new, marvellous, intoxicating’. S Weil I KNEW YOU WERE TROUBLE HTTPS://WWW.YOUTUBE.COM/WATCH?V=VNOKGUSDY4Y 1.55-3.20*** I KNEW YOU WERE TROUBLE • And he's long gone When he's next to me • Once upon a time And I realize the blame is on me A few mistakes ago • 'Cause I knew you were trouble when you walked in I was in your sights So shame on me now You got me alone Flew me to places I'd never been You found me X3 ‘Til you put me down, oh I guess you didn't care I knew you were trouble when you walked in And I guess I liked that So, shame on me now And when I fell hard Flew me to places I'd never been You took a step back Now I'm lyin' on the cold hard ground Oh, oh Without me X3 Trouble, trouble, trouble… IDENTIFY OUR HOOKS AND TRIGGERS AND LEARN TO RESPOND IN DIFFERENT, HEALTHY WAYS • ‘All sins are attempts to fill voids’, Simone Weil. How can we avoid our pitfalls? How can we fill our empty internal spaces in healthy ways? How do we learn to stop self-saboutaging? • How can we help our young do the same? • NB: ‘We can ignore reality but we cannot ignore the consequences of ignoring reality’, A Rand WHAT IS DRIVING OUR PRESENT SEX OBSESSED CULTURE…. GREAT RESOURCE ON KINSEY JUDITH REISMAN, ‘SEXUAL SABOTAGE: HOW ONE MAD SCIENTIST UNLEASHED A PLAGUE…’ HTTP://WWW.DRJUDITHREISMAN.COM • Father of the Sex Revolution, d. 1956 • Kinsey’s programme: The ‘liberation’ of sex from its ignorant, guilt-ridden past through ‘science’ and the promotion of happy, healthy, inhibition-free sexuality. What’s not to like?!? • Kinsey’s ideology: Spread via Playboy, sexual ‘health’ organisations and some sex ‘education’ LOOKING CLOSER: KINSEY’S IDEOLOGY… OH DEAR • ‘Fornicate early; fornicate often; fornicate in every possible way’ • For Kinsey, ‘all types of sexual activity---sex with the opposite sex, sex with the same sex, sex with both sexes, sex with children, sex with whips and chains, fisting sex, sex with animals---any kind of sex was normal and common [and good]’, Dr Charles Socarides • Pornography is vital as the gateway to actual sex, and tutors, grooms and grants permission AND STILL MORE • Kinsey was an entomologist who collected millions of wasps; he knew little about human biology or psychology. He was a sadomasochist who experienced orgasm by inserting soft and later hard objects up his urethra while masturbating: pipecleaners, pencils and toothbrushes (brush end first). He had hundreds+ male partners. He and his ‘research’ team were filmed having sex in his sound-proof attic studio. His marriage and family life were largely shams. He later struggled with impotence and died an early death from self-inflicted sexual wounds. AND YET MORE • Kinsey was a sex addict whose PR spin (AKA ‘research’), aided by MSM, duped a gullible public. ‘Liberating’ sex à la Kinsey has contributed to massive increases in STIs, illegitimacy, rape, child sex abuse and family breakdown. His ‘research’ on child sexuality---children are sexual beings---was obtained from close contact with several pedophiles. It has not been replicated elsewhere: e.g. Table 34. KINSEY EXAMPLES OF MULTIPLE ORGASM IN PREADOLESCENT MALES (MALE REPORT, TABLE 34. P. 180; ABBREVIATED) Age No. of Orgasms Time Involved Age No. of Orgasms Time Involved 5 mon 3 ? 7 yr 7 3 hr 11 mon 10 1 hr 8 yr 8 2 hr 11 mon 14 38 min. 9 yr 7 68 min 2 yr 7 9 min. 10 yr 9 52 min 2 yr 11 65 min. 10 yr 14 24 hr 2.5 yr 4 2 min. 11 yr 11 1 hr 4 yr 6 5 min. 11 yr 19 1 hr 4 yr 17 10 hr. 12 yr 7 3 hr 4 yr 26 24 hr. 12 yr 3 3 min THE WAR ON CHILDREN • ***On Alfred Kinsey: https://www.mercatornet.com/mobile/view/robbing- children-of-their-innocence CLIP 27:23- 29:04 MORE ON KINSEY: DVD KINSEY: 49.20-52.33*** • Kinsey DVD: Why did he label children’s responses as orgasms? BC of his own sadomasochism • Kinsey DVD: Look at his face and those of the children’s • Also, using this ‘data’ is like using rapists’ descriptions to research women’s sexuality • No child psychologist or educational theorist in the 20th C. except Kinsey has advocated sex for children DANGERS TO CHILDREN THROUGH CSE/PORN • Children are physically, mentally, psychologically and sexually immature. They have not gone through puberty and thus have only an incipient sexuality, the makings of it • CSE/porn foregrounds and amplifies sex and sexual pleasure to children: all wrong! They have far more important developmental tasks; focusing their mind on sex now is child abuse. We were spared such insidious propaganda when small. HTTPS://EVERACCOUNTABLE.COM/BLOG/ HOW-PORNOGRAPHY-AFFECTS- TEENAGERS-AND-CHILDREN/ • More than anything, the pornographic worldview creates a culture of recreational sex. It destroys the basis for intimacy and promotes infidelity for both sexes. The only way to overcome these effects is to address these responses to pornography with your child, in a healthy way that does not promote shame TUTORING CHILDREN IN HAVING SEX: ‘SPRING FEVER’ FOR 8-9 YO CHILDREN. ***TO 1.00 HTTPS://SPRINGFEVER.ORG.UK/CLIPS/YEAR4_LESSON2.3 ‘ALL ABOUT ME’, CSE PROGRAMME, WAS IN 241 WARWICKSHIRE SCHOOLS. FOR 4YO CHILDREN. HTTPS://APPS.WARW ICKSHIRE.GOV.UK/API /DOCUMENTS/WCCC -630-1591 PROBLEMS WITH THIS SEX EDUCATION • How paedophiles groom vulnerable children. • ‘Mirror mechanism’: Show & Tell leading to Go & Do. ***War on Children 4.00-4.47, which helps to explain high rates of child-on- child sexual assaults • The PSHE Association warned (2015) against ‘too much detail’ when teaching about self harm, as it could ‘trigger unhealthy responses’, but what about here? ‘THE WAR ON CHILDREN’, FAMILY WATCH INTERNATIONAL • Sexualizes children • Threatens their health • Promotes a dangerous gender ideology • Undermines the parent-child relationship DANGERS TO TEENS THROUGH CSE/PORN/SEX • Even teenagers are not properly equipped to weigh up the risks. Their limbic system (the reward/pleasure centre of the brain) appears to be developed by their mid teens, but not their PFC, with its executive functions of reasoning, judgment, controlling impulses and moderating social behaviour. Desires---Just Do It!-- -tend to win. Note also the role of hormones and the vulnerablility of teen girls’ genitalia, which is why so many get STIs. See Miriam Grossman below. • The Age of Consent in the UK: legally 16, but 13 or increasingly down to 11 or lower if the VERY sex is ‘consensual’ and involving minimal age POPULAR differentials. • According to Brook’s ‘traffic light tool’, for BROOK, UK 13- to 17-year-olds, ‘normal’ behaviour YOUTH includes pornography and consensual oral or SEXUAL penetrative vaginal and/or anal sex with ‘HEALTH’ same or opposite sex partners. CHARITY MORE HARMLESS NAUGHTY FUN: QUEER EVERYTHING! AUSTIN TX NOV 2017, DRAG FESTIVAL TABOOS ARE MEANT TO BE BROKEN! DR ELLY BARNES HTTPS://WWW.YOUTUBE.COM/WATCH?V=7G1YNH_CD W0 •End goal: Queering kids/ Smashing Hetero- normativity PART OF QUEER KINK KINKSTERS • Though various terms are used to describe it, kink is sometimes spoken of as a sexual ‘orientation’.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • KINSEY: CRIMES & CONSEQUENCES “Dr
    KC&C Cover3RD 1/2/03 8:50 AM Page 1 C M Y CM MY CY CMY K KINSEY: CRIMES &CONSEQUENCES KINSEY: “Dr. Reisman has produced a scholarly and devastating study revealing the ugly and frighteningly dangerous pseudo-scientific assault on our children's innocence.” “Dr. Laura” Schlessinger “The Sexual Revolution was based on a lie. Judith Reisman has spent thirty years uncovering the truth.” The Red Queen & National Review The Grand Scheme In 1948, the Institute for Sex “In the course of producing my documentary — Kinsey’s Research at Indiana University Paedophiles — it became clear that every substantive allegation was led by eugenicist Alfred C. Kinsey, whose sex research Reisman made was not only true but thoroughly sourced with shook America’s moral documentary evidence—despite the Kinsey Institute’s reluctance foundations and launched the to open its files.” 1960s Sexual Revolution. Fifty years later new Tim Tate, UNESCO and Amnesty International Award-winning Producer- revelations confirm Dr. Judith Reisman’s 1981 expose of Director of “Kinsey’s Paedophiles,” Yorkshire Television, Great Britain scientific fraud and criminally derived data contained in the publicly funded Kinsey Reports. Dr. Reisman revealed KINSEY: CRIMES & CONSEQUENCES that Kinsey conducted human THIRD EDITION, REVISED & EXPANDED experiments in a soundproof Though Kinsey has been dead since 1956, the "Kinseyan influence" is even stronger today. laboratory built to his Kinsey was never an unbiased researcher. He was a "covert crusader." Like Lewis Carroll's specifications at Indiana Red Queen, Kinsey already had the "sentence" in mind for America, before his research was University, and that the sexual compiled and before the scientific "verdict" could be rendered.
    [Show full text]
  • WHY NO ARRESTS of THOUSANDS of MEN WHO ARE INFECTING BOYS? by Judith A
    WHY NO ARRESTS OF THOUSANDS OF MEN WHO ARE INFECTING BOYS? By Judith A. Reisman, PhD 1 1 This essay was originally written circa 1995. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS GENOME RESEARCH REJECTS THE "GAY GENE" THEORY.............................................................. 3 TAX DOLLARS FOR CULT USED TO ACCESS SCHOOLCHILDREN.................................................. 4 THE HARD DATA ON HOMOSEXUAL V. HETEROSEXUAL CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE ................... 4 150 BOY “GAY” VICTIMS V. 20 GIRL “STRAIGHT” VICTIMS PER MOLESTER .............................. 6 CHILD PORNOGRAPHY A STANDARD IN EARLY “ADVOCATE” PERIODICALS.................. 7 “THE THIRTEEN-YEAR-OLD HERO” … “HIS ERECTION BULGES”.................................................. 8 RECRUIT, RECRUIT, RECRUIT!................................................................................................................ 9 AS AIDS CAUSES BOYS TO “SHUN OLDER GAYS” RECRUITMENT INCREASES ....................... 10 Gay Groups Discourage AIDS Tests For Boys ........................................................................................ 10 BOY PROSTITUTION--“INTERGAY” HATE CRIMES AGAINST BOYS ............................................ 10 “Gay Men View These Boys As Recreational Toys:”.............................................................................. 10 LLOYD: ROUGHLY HALF A MILLION PROSTITUTED BOYS........................................................... 11 WEST: THE GAY LIFESTYLE LEADS “NATURALLY TO PROSTITUTION”.................................... 12 Ratio 5:1 AIDS Boys to
    [Show full text]
  • Brief Amici Curiae of Dr. Judith Reisman and the Child
    No. 16-273 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES GLOUCESTER COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, Petitioner, v. G.G. by her next friend and mother, DEIRDRE GRIMM, Respondent On Writ of Certiorari to the U.S. Court Of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE DR. JUDITH REISMAN AND THE CHILD PROTECTION INSTITUTE IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONER Mathew D. Staver Mary E. McAlister (Counsel of Record) LIBERTY COUNSEL Anita L. Staver PO Box 11108 Horatio G. Mihet Lynchburg, VA 24506 LIBERTY COUNSEL (407) 875-1776 PO Box 540774 [email protected] Orlando, FL 327854 (407) 875-1776 [email protected] i TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ........................ ivv INTEREST OF AMICI .................................... 1 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT ..................................................... 2 LEGAL ARGUMENT ...................................... 6 I. THIS COURT SHOULD REJECT THE DEPARTMENTS’ DIRECTIVE BECAUSE THERE IS NO SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE FOR THE CONCEPT OF A DIFFERENTIAL “GENDER IDENTITY.” ........................................ 6 II. THIS COURT SHOULD GIVE NO EFFECT TO THE DEPARTMENTS’ INTERPRETATION BECAUSE IT REPLACES SCIENTIFIC REALITY WITH AN ARTIFICIAL SOCIAL CONSTRUCT BUILT UPON CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE, FRAUD AND HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION. ................... 20 ii A. Alfred Kinsey Disguises Child Sexual Abuse As Scientific Data On “Pre- Adolescent Orgasm” And Launches The Idea Of Fluid Sexuality. ......................... 21 B. Dr. Harry Benjamin Used Kinsey’s Concepts To Become The Father Of Transsexualism And Posit The Existence of Seven Sexes. ........................................... 26 C. Dr. John Money Used Kinsey’s Model Of Human Experimentation To Develop His Concept Of Transgenderism And Sex “Re-Assignment.” ...................... 30 D. Socio-Political Change Agents Hijack The Language To Further Their Agenda Of Deconstructing Binary Sex.
    [Show full text]
  • Jonathon Van Maren - 2017
    The forgotten and misunderstood history of the Sexual Revolution The 1970s blew to smithereens an entire structure of sexual morality. Revolutions like that do not last forever. They cannot. But the ending of a revolution is not the same thing as the restoration of the old order. It is the institutionalization of a new one. --David Frum, How We Got Here The Sexual Revolution and the new normal There is no series of historical events that has impacted every human living in the Western world today—and even beyond—more than the Sexual Revolution. And yet, while many are certainly familiar with the term, almost no one can explain what the Sexual Revolution is. Internet pornography, legalized abortion, the gay liberation movement, hook-up culture, contraception, public nudity, transgenderism, and threats to religious freedom are all either part of or the direct result of the Sexual Revolution. Television, the film industry, advertising agencies, academia, the media, and the music industry have all been shaped by the Sexual Revolution, and play an incessantly active role in promoting it. We are so saturated by these influences that rarely do we even notice. We simply take it for granted that this is the way things are, often without questioning how or why these things came to be. For example, consider hook-up culture on campuses, now considered the norm and lionized in dozens of stupid campus comedy films. When I was attending Simon Fraser University in British Columbia, Canada, it was just accepted that the binge-drinking that took place was accompanied by casual sex—and if that wasn’t happening, it wasn’t for lack of effort on behalf of the students.
    [Show full text]
  • B4u-Act's 2011 Symposium on Pedophilia, Minor-Attracted Persons
    ISSN 2375-2173 B4U-ACT’S 2011 SYMPOSIUM ON PEDOPHILIA, MINOR-ATTRACTED PERSONS AND THE DSM Judith A. Reisman, Ph.D.† Geoffrey B. Strickland † INTRODUCTION On its website and in its publicity, B4U-Act defines itself as a non- profit organization based in Maryland.1 The organization purports to educate mental health professionals and society about pedophilia and to suggest therapeutic support to other “self-identified . adults and adolescents” who desire sex with children.2 B4U-Act claims its mission is to merely eliminate the “stigma” against pedophilia by removing what they call the “tremendous barriers to communication” among pedophiles, mental health professionals, and the public.3 To facilitate these ends, they hold workshops and other gatherings to allegedly promote “dialog.”4 The purpose of this paper is to give an overview and analysis of B4U-Act’s most recent gathering, a symposium entitled: “Pedophilia, Minor-Attracted Persons and the DSM.” The authors5 will argue that B4U-Act, while purporting to ffl Judith A. Reisman, PhD, is a Visiting Professor of Law, Liberty University School of Law. She is a Distinguished Senior Fellow from The Inter-American Institute, and a Scientific Adviser, to the California Protective Parents Association and a Former Principal Investigator, US Department of Justice study “Images of Children, Crime and Violence in Playboy, Penthouse and Hustler,” Grant No. 84-JN-AX-K007. ffl Geoffrey Strickland received his B.A. in Theology and Philosophy from Franciscan University, Steubenville, in May 2004. He received his J.D. from Ave Maria School of Law in May 2009 and was certified in Islamic Studies in May 2011 from the Pontifical Institute of Arabic and Islamic Studies, Rome, Italy.
    [Show full text]
  • Kinsey Institute Will Sexualize Children—Yet Again
    The Kinsey Institute Sexualizes Children—Yet Again! Domestic Terrorism by “Academe” .by Judith Reisman (2002) Author, Kinsey, Crimes & Consequences . The Kinsey Institute Normalizes Child Molestation.................................................................... 1 . All Kinsey Institute Directors Must Cover Up Kinsey’s Child Rape Protocol .............................. 2 . The Scope Of The Child Exploitation Pandemic ........................................................................ 3 . Public Libraries Cultivate Child Sexual Abuse........................................................................... 3 . Paroled Pedophiles Lusting At Your Local Library .................................................................... 4 . Marauding, Molesting Teachers and School Superintendents ................................................... 5 . Survivors Of Educator Abuse Emerge (Sesame) ........................................................................ 7 . 15% Of Students Say Sexually Abused By Faculty Or Staff ....................................................... 7 . The ALA, ACLU and Kinsey Institute Are Pornography Grantees ............................................. 8 . Briefly: Pornography’s Effect On The Developing Brain ........................................................... 9 . The Kaiser Family Foundation Survey .................................................................................... 10 . Primitive, Potent Passions Bypass Thought and Speech ..........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Brief Vitae of Judith A. Reisman, Ph.D
    Brief Vitae of Judith A. Reisman, Ph.D. AUTHOR: BOOK PUBLICATIONS Images of Children, Crime and Violence in Playboy, Penthouse, and Hustler, US Dep. Justice Grant No. 84-JN-AX-K007, 1986, 1989, 1990. Kinsey, Sex and Fraud, Judith Reisman et al., Lafayette LA: Huntington House, 1990. Soft Porn Plays Hardball, Lafayette: LA. Huntington House, 1991. Kinsey, Crimes & Consequences, The Institute for Media Education, Crestwood, KY., 1998, 2000, 2003. EDUCATION Ph.D. 1980 in Communications, Case Western Reserve University M.A. 1976 in Communications, Case Western Reserve University PARTIAL LIST OF INCLUSIONS/CITATIONS TO RESEARCH AND FINDINGS IN SCHOLARLY AND POPULAR BOOKS: Search Google for Update · Savage, M., (2005) Liberalism is a Mental Disorder, Nashville, Tennessee, Nelson Current. Savage's criticism of Kinsey's use of fraudulent data and sex crimes against children to launch the sexual revolution · Kupelian, D., (2005) The Marketing of EVIL, Nashville, Tennessee, WND Books, The citation of Reisman's findings of Kinsey's fraudulent data and sex crimes against children launched a bizarre and aborted faculty attack on Ohio State University Reference librarian, Scott Savage, April-May 2006--as of this writting Mr. Savage is contemplating defamation litigation. · Brinkman, S., (2004) The Kinsey Corruption: An Expose, Catholic Standard and Times, Ascension Press, West Chester PA (book based on Reisman's findings) · Wagner, T., (2003) Back to the Drawing Board, "The Kinsey Culture: Sex on Demand, Abortion on Demand," South Bend, St. Augustine's Press (chapter) · Kastleman, M. (2001) Internet Pornography: The Drug of the New Millennium, Orem, UT, Granite Pub. (Foreword, citation) · Jones. E. Michael (2000) Libido Dominadi: Sexual Liberation and Political Control, South Bend IN: St.
    [Show full text]
  • KINSEY: CRIMES & CONSEQUENCES “Dr
    KC&C Cover3RD 1/2/03 8:50 AM Page 1 C M Y CM MY CY CMY K KINSEY: CRIMES &CONSEQUENCES KINSEY: “Dr. Reisman has produced a scholarly and devastating study revealing the ugly and frighteningly dangerous pseudo-scientific assault on our children's innocence.” “Dr. Laura” Schlessinger “The Sexual Revolution was based on a lie. Judith Reisman has spent thirty years uncovering the truth.” The Red Queen & National Review The Grand Scheme In 1948, the Institute for Sex “In the course of producing my documentary — Kinsey’s Research at Indiana University Paedophiles — it became clear that every substantive allegation was led by eugenicist Alfred C. Kinsey, whose sex research Reisman made was not only true but thoroughly sourced with shook America’s moral documentary evidence—despite the Kinsey Institute’s reluctance foundations and launched the to open its files.” 1960s Sexual Revolution. Fifty years later new Tim Tate, UNESCO and Amnesty International Award-winning Producer- revelations confirm Dr. Judith Reisman’s 1981 expose of Director of “Kinsey’s Paedophiles,” Yorkshire Television, Great Britain scientific fraud and criminally derived data contained in the publicly funded Kinsey Reports. Dr. Reisman revealed KINSEY: CRIMES & CONSEQUENCES that Kinsey conducted human THIRD EDITION, REVISED & EXPANDED experiments in a soundproof Though Kinsey has been dead since 1956, the "Kinseyan influence" is even stronger today. laboratory built to his Kinsey was never an unbiased researcher. He was a "covert crusader." Like Lewis Carroll's specifications at Indiana Red Queen, Kinsey already had the "sentence" in mind for America, before his research was University, and that the sexual compiled and before the scientific "verdict" could be rendered.
    [Show full text]
  • PCHC Webinar: What Are Obscenity Exemptions & Why Must They Be Repealed?
    PCHC Webinar: What Are Obscenity Exemptions & Why Must They Be Repealed? By Judith Reisman, PhD. And Mary McAlister, Esq. Oct. 2017 © Materials Defined As Obscene Are Not Protected by the First Amendment. Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476 , 485 (1957) • A cornerstone of our Constitutional Republic is “freedom of speech” as stated in the First Amendment to the Constitution. • Over the years, the concept of “freedom of speech” has expanded beyond spoken or written words to include “expression” of all types, e.g., literature, art, political activity, photographs, broadcasts, internet postings, as courts have attempted to protect innovative methods of self-expression from censorship. • Throughout history, there have been limited categories of speech that are not protected by the First Amendment, which means that the government can ban the activity. • Obscenity • Libel/Slander/Defamation • Insulting or “fighting” words—those which by their very utterance inflict injury or tend to incite an immediate breach of the peace, e.g., yelling2 “fire” in a crowded theater. Modern Definition of “Obscenity”: Material which deals with sex in a manner appealing to “prurient interest.” “Prurient interest” means “material having a tendency to excite lustful thoughts.” “Prurient interest,” the Court explained, Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476 , 485 (1957) Legal Test for Determining If Material is Obscene: 1. Whether ‘the average person, applying contemporary community standards* would find that the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest; 2. Whether the work depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct specifically defined by the applicable state law; and 3.
    [Show full text]
  • The Origins of the Transgender Phenomenon
    Liberty University DigitalCommons@Liberty University Faculty Publications and Presentations Liberty University School of Law 11-2016 The Origins of the Transgender Phenomenon: The Challenge and Opportunity for Training Lawyers, Judges and Policy Makers in the Historicity of Alfred Kinsey’s Pansexual Worldview Judith Reisman [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/lusol_fac_pubs Part of the Sexuality and the Law Commons Recommended Citation Reisman, Judith, "The Origins of the Transgender Phenomenon: The hC allenge and Opportunity for Training Lawyers, Judges and Policy Makers in the Historicity of Alfred Kinsey’s Pansexual Worldview" (2016). Faculty Publications and Presentations. 74. http://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/lusol_fac_pubs/74 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Liberty University School of Law at DigitalCommons@Liberty University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications and Presentations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Liberty University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Origins of the Transgender Phenomenon The challenge and opportunity for training lawyers, judges and policy makers in the historicity1 of Alfred Kinsey’s pansexual worldview Judith Gelernter Reisman, Ph.D. Mary E. McAlister, Esq.2 INTRODUCTION How has the country gone from a “firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence”3 to where defining marriage as the union of one man and one woman is condemned as constitutionally irrational,4 and where the use of sex-separate private spaces by biological sex is subject to federal discrimination lawsuits?5 The answer can be traced to 1948 when Dr. Alfred C.
    [Show full text]
  • The Link Between Pornography, Sex Trafficking, and Abortion
    The Link Between Pornography, Sex Trafficking, and Abortion Arina O. Grossu and Sean Maguire Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 2 Pornography Pornography Saturation and Consumption.......................................................................................... 2 Pornography Creates the Demand for Sexual Exploitation ................................................................ 2 Federal Obscenity Laws Regulating the Production and Distribution of Pornography................. 3 Pornography’s Effect on the Brain.......................................................................................................... 3 How Pornography Shapes Sexual Desires ........................................................................................... 4 The Link Between Pornography Use and Paid Sex.............................................................................. 5 Pornography: A Public Health Crisis .................................................................................................... 5 Money Talks: The Porn Industry’s Profits ............................................................................................ 6 Sex Trafficking and Exploitation The Link Between Pornography and Sex Trafficking .......................................................................... 6 Porn Use in Trafficking Initiation ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Reisman Amicus
    Appeal: 15-2056 Doc: 55-1 Filed: 11/30/2015 Pg: 1 of 42 Total Pages:(1 of 45) No. 15-2056 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT __________________________________________________________________ G.G., by his next friend and mother, DEIRDRE GRIMM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GLOUCESTER COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, Defendant-Appellee. __________________________________________________________________ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia Newport News Division BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE LIBERTY CENTER FOR CHILD PROTECTION AND JUDITH REISMAN, PH.D., IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT-APPELLEE, SEEKING AFFIRMANCE MARY E. McALISTER MATHEW D. STAVER Liberty Counsel ANITA L. STAVER P.O. Box 11108 HORATIO G. MIHET Lynchburg, VA 24506 Liberty Counsel (434) 592-7000 Telephone P.O. Box 540774 email [email protected] Orlando, FL 32854 (800) 671-1776 Telephone email [email protected] Attorneys for Amici Curiae Liberty Center for Child Protection and Judith Reisman, Ph.D. Appeal: 15-2056 Doc: 55-1 Filed: 11/30/2015 Pg: 2 of 42 Total Pages:(2 of 45) STATEMENT REGARDING CONSENT TO FILE, AUTHORSHIP, AND MONETARY CONTRIBUTIONS Appellant’s counsel has consented to the filing of this brief. Appellee’s counsel has stated that it does not consent, but does not oppose Amici Curiae’s motion for leave to file an amicus brief. Pursuant to Rule 29(c) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, Amici Curiae state that no counsel for a party authored this brief in whole or in part, and no counsel or party made a monetary contribution intended to fund the preparation or submission of this brief.
    [Show full text]