Distribution of Chara Braunii Gmellin 1826 (Charophyta) in Poland

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Distribution of Chara Braunii Gmellin 1826 (Charophyta) in Poland Vol. 76, No. 4: 313-320, 2007 ACTA SOCIETATIS BOTANICORUM POLONIAE 313 DISTRIBUTION OF CHARA BRAUNII GMELLIN 1826 (CHAROPHYTA) IN POLAND JACEK URBANIAK Department of Botany and Plant Ecology Wroc³aw University of Environmental and Life Sciences Pl. Grunwaldzki 24a, 50-363 Wroc³aw, Poland e-mail: [email protected] (Received: May 22, 2006. Accepted: May 15, 2007) ABSTRACT The distribution and ecology of Chara braunii Gmellin 1826 in Poland is described, based on herbaria collec- tions, literature data and own investigations. Maps showing the distribution of Ch. braunii are presented, as well as a list of localities with brief descriptions of the habitats. Additionally, some remarks on the distribution limit in the northern hemisphere are given. KEY WORDS: Chara braunii, charophyta, charceae, algae, distribution, fish ponds, ecology, Poland. INTRODUCTION MATERIAL AND METHODS Chara braunii (Chara coronata) is the only one of seve- The maps of the distribution of Chara braunii in Poland ral ecorticated species of the genus Chara occurring in Eu- and Europe were prepared on the basis field investigations rope (Krause 1997) and the only species without cortica- done in 2003-2005, literature data and herbarium collec- tion known from Poland. tions. I have examined the collections of charophytes from Fish ponds are in Poland the only known sites where the following herbaria (acronyms according to Holmgren Chara braunii can be found, and where Ch. braunii someti- and Holmgren 1998) and private collections: Izabela mes build a community: Charetum coronatae Corillion D¹mbska Collection placed in Department of Hydrobiolo- 1957 with Ch. braunii as a characteristic species. Almost gy, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznañ (I.D.); Museum all the presently known localities of Ch. braunii have been of Natural History, University of Wroc³aw, Wroc³aw found in southern Poland (southern Wielkopolska Low- (WRSL, BRSL); Staatlichen Museum für Naturkunde, land, Lower and Upper Silesia, Sandomierska Valley and Görlitz (GLM); authors own collection placed in Depart- Lublin Upland), where fish ponds are relatively common. ment of Botany and Plant Ecology, Wroc³aw (J.U.). Addi- According to D¹mbska (1964, 1966), Karczmarz (1966), tional material of European charophytes from Scandinavia Tomaszewicz (1979), Podbielkowski and Tomaszewicz based on own data and herbaria collections: Botanical Mu- (1996), Pukacz and Pe³echaty (2004), Ch. braunii has in sem, Lund University, Lund (L); Natural History Museum, Poland a northern distribution limit in Northern Hemisphe- Stockholm (S); Botanical Museum, Umeå (UM); Botanical re. However Corillion (1957), Wood and Imahori (1965) Museum, Uppsala (U), have been added by Irmgard Blin- show that Ch. braunii is a cosmopolitan species widely di- dow (Greifswald University, Germany). The determination stributed all over the World between 65° N, and 35° S. The of the specimens has been done by J. Urbaniak and I. Blin- main reason for these contradictory positions seems to be dow based on Krause (1997). a poor investigation status of the past and present occur- The 10×10 km ATPOL grid square system was used for rence of Ch. braunii in Poland. This was probably the rea- the preparation of the distribution map in Poland and for son for which Ch. braunii has been placed on a red list the arrangement of lists of localities. For every locality in of endangered algae in Poland in the category indetermi- the list, the following data are presented: name or locality nate (Siemiñska 1992). of the pond, the coordinates of the locality in the ATPOL So the main aim of this study was to present the details grid system (Zaj¹c 1978), the collectors name and literatu- of the distribution of Ch. braunii in Poland, and to compare re data. it with their distribution limit in Europe, especially in the The geographical distribution in Europe is based on mate- northern hemisphere. Additional some ecological aspects rial found in herbaria (listed above) and literature (Migula of their occurrence in Poland are presented. 1897; Corillion 1957; Langangen 1974; Hollerbach and Pala- 314 CHARA BRAUNII IN POLAND Urbaniak J. mar-Mordvinceva 1991; Palamar-Mordvinceva and Tsarenko rillion 1957; Wood and Imahori 1965), Africa (Corillion 2004; Compére 1992; Bruinsma et al. 1998; Cambra et al. 1957) and Saudii Arabia (Hussain and Khoja 1999). 1998; Langangen et al. 2002; Zhakova 2003; Borisova 2005). The distribution in Poland The distribution of Chara braunii in Poland is presented RESULTS on Figure 5. Description of the species The plant is small to medium size, robust, fresh green to LIST OF LOCALITIES brownish green when found in the muddy bottom; transpa- rent and richly branched. Plants are entirely ecorticate (Fig. AD grid square: Prov. Lubuskie. 74 Tuplice, fish pond 1). The main axis slender up to 1200 µm in diameter. The (Pukacz and Pe³echaty 2004). stipulodes occur in a single whorl and are well developed. AE grid square: Prov. Dolnol¹skie. 79 Podgórzyn near Branchlets 6-10 in a whorl, straight and occasionally incu- Jelenia Góra, fish pond (Schröder 1928). rved; segments 4-6, the last one often reduced with 1 or BD grid square: Prov. Dolnol¹skie. 98 Radzi¹dz, fish more small end cells forming tiny terminal corona (Fig. 2). pond Jeleni (Schröder 1928). Bracteoles slightly longer as the oospore. The species is BE grid square: Prov. Dolnol¹skie. 08 ¯migród, fish monoecious and richly fertile; oogonia are situated above pond Kogut (D¹mbska 1963). 21 Goliszów, pond near the antheridia. The oospore is dark brown or black; mem- the village (D¹mbska 1966). 22 Niedwiedzice, fish pond brane smooth to slightly granular (Figs 3 and 4). nr. 17, leg. I. D¹mbska, 1963 (I.D.); Niedwiedzice, fish pond nr. 6, leg. I. D¹mbska, 1963 (I.D.). 23 Ma³a Raszo- General distribution wa pond nr. 7, leg. I. D¹mbska, 1963 (I.D.). 29 Trzebni- As may be seen in the Table 1, Chara braunii is one of ca, pond leg. B. Schröder, 1896 (GLM). the 33 different species of the genus Chara that can be fo- CD grid square: Prov. Dolnol¹skie. 91 Stawno, fish und in Poland. According to Corillion (1957) and Wood, pond S³oneczny, leg. I. D¹mbska, 1961 (I.D.); Stawno, Imahori (1965) who summarized the world and European fish pond Jezuicki, leg. I. D¹mbska, 1961 (I.D.); Ruda distribution of charophytes, Ch. braunii belongs to cosmo- Milicka, fish pond S³upicki, leg. I. Dambska, 1961 politan species. In the southern part of Europe, the species (I.D.); Ruda Milicka, fish pond Jaskó³czy (D¹mbska can bee found in Greece, Albania and the Iberian Peninsu- 1963); Ruda Milicka, fish pond Jaskó³czy, leg. J. Urba- la. The species is known from Asia: (Siberia, Kazakhstan, niak, 2003 (J.U.); Ruda Milicka, fish pond Jaskó³czy, India, Pakistan, Japan, China, Philipines and Indonesia leg. J. Urbaniak and K. Kuriata, 2005 (J.U.). 92 G¹dko- (Isle Lombock maximal altitude 2400 m a. s. l.) (Braun wice, fish pond Sza³wia, leg. K. Kuriata, 2005 (J.U.); and Nordstedt 1882; Corillion 1957; Pal et al. 1962; Wood G¹dkowice, fish pond Jasny Dolny, leg. K. Kuriata, 2005 and Imahori 1965; Imahori 1954; Fushan and Yaoying (J.U.). 94 Dêbnica, fish pond Dêbnicki Du¿y, leg. I. 1994; Sviridenko 2000); Australia and New Zeland (Zane- D¹mbska, 1964 (I.D.); Dêbnica, fish pond zimochów, veld 1940; Corillion 1957), North and South America (Co- leg. I. D¹mbska, 1964 (I.D.). Fig. 1. Ecorticated branchlet with oogonia and antheridia of Chara braunii. Vol. 76, No. 4: 313-320, 2007 ACTA SOCIETATIS BOTANICORUM POLONIAE 315 Fig. 2. The last reduced segment of branchlet forming tiny terminal corona. DF grid square: Prov. l¹skie. 72 Pszczyna (Schröder 1926). 76 Zator, fish pond south of the fish farm Przy- rêb near Zator, leg. I. D¹mbska, 1963 (I.D.); Zator, fish pond in the fish farm Bugaj, leg. I. D¹mbska, 1963 (I.D.). 81 Go³ysz, fish pond Wyszni VIII, leg. I. D¹mb- ska, 1960 (I.D.); Go³ysz, fish pond Byczek Wielki, leg. I. D¹mbska, 1960 (I.D.); Go³ysz, fish pond Wyszni VI, leg. I. D¹mbska, 1960 (I.D.); Go³ysz, fish pond M³yñski, leg. I. D¹mbska, 1960 (I.D.); Go³ysz fish pond Okr¹g³y Dol- ny, leg. I. D¹mbska, 1960 (I. D); Go³ysz, fish pond Ba- ¿yniec Dolny, leg. I. D¹mbska, 1960 (I.D.); Ochaby, fish pond Spo³eczny, leg. I. D¹mbska, 1960 (I.D.); Ochaby, fish pond Odyniec, Rakowski? leg. I. D¹mbska, 1960 (I.D.); Ochaby, fish pond Rakowski, leg. I. D¹mbska, 1960 (I.D.); Ochaby, fish pond Olszyniak, leg. I. D¹mb- ska, 1960 (I.D.); Ochaby, fish pond Szyszkowski, leg. I. D¹mbska, 1960 (I.D.); Ochaby, fish pond Kara, leg. I. D¹mbska, 1960 (I.D.). 82 Landek, fish pond Staw Ksiê- ¿ok Ma³y I, leg. I. D¹mbska, 1960 (I.D.); Landek, fish po- nd Feruga, leg. I. D¹mbska, 1960 (I.D.); Landek, fish po- nd Zabrzeski, leg. I. D¹mbska, 1960 (I.D.). DF grid square: Prov. Ma³opolskie. 69 Podgórze near Kraków leg. (?) 18. (WRSL). Fig. 3. Oospore of Chara braunii. FF grid square: Prov. Podkarpackie. 02 Stale, fish pond in forestry Stale. (Karczmarz et al. 1974). 03 Grêbów, CE grid square: Prov. Dolnol¹skie. 21 Kronice, fish pond, leg. I. D¹mbska, 1964 (I.D.). 60 Pustynia, pond pond Wrzosowy (Schröder 1928); Kronice, fish pond (D¹mbska 1966). Wrzosowy, leg. I. D¹mbska, 1961 (I.D.); pond near Kro- GE grid square: Prov. Lubelskie. 70 Drozdówka, pond nice, (Schröder 1926; Schröder 1928). Prov. Opolskie. 86 (Karczmarz 1966). Marsza³ki, pond Marsza³ek, leg. I. D¹mbska, 1963 (I.D.).
Recommended publications
  • Red Names=Invasive Species Green Names=Native Species
    CURLY-LEAF PONDWEED EURASIAN WATERMIL- FANWORT CHARA (Potamogeton crispus) FOIL (Cabomba caroliniana) (Chara spp.) This undesirable exotic, also known (Myriophyllum spicatum) This submerged exotic Chara is typically found growing in species is not common as Crisp Pondweed, bears a waxy An aggressive plant, this exotic clear, hard water. Lacking true but management tools are cuticle on its upper leaves making milfoil can grow nearly 10 feet stems and leaves, Chara is actually a limited. Very similar to them stiff and somewhat brittle. in length forming dense mats form of algae. It’s stems are hollow aquarium species. Leaves The leaves have been described as at the waters surface. Grow- with leaf-like structures in a whorled are divided into fine resembling lasagna noodles, but ing in muck, sand, or rock, it pattern. It may be found growing branches in a fan-like ap- upon close inspection a row of has become a nuisance plant with tiny, orange fruiting bodies on pearance, opposite struc- “teeth” can be seen to line the mar- in many lakes and ponds by the branches called akinetes. Thick ture, spanning 2 inches. gins. Growing in dense mats near quickly outcompeting native masses of Chara can form in some Floating leaves are small, the water’s surface, it outcompetes species. Identifying features areas. Often confused with Starry diamond shape with a native plants for sun and space very include a pattern of 4 leaves stonewort, Coontail or Milfoils, it emergent white/pinkish early in spring. By midsummer, whorled around a hollow can be identified by a gritty texture flower.
    [Show full text]
  • Bioone? RESEARCH
    RESEARCH BioOne? EVOLVED Proximate Nutrient Analyses of Four Species of Submerged Aquatic Vegetation Consumed by Florida Manatee (Trichechus manatus latirostris) Compared to Romaine Lettuce (Lactuca sativa var. longifolia) Author(s): Jessica L. Siegal-Willott, D.V.M., Dipl. A.C.Z.M., Kendal Harr, D.V.M., M.S., Dipl. A.C.V.P., Lee-Ann C. Hayek, Ph.D., Karen C. Scott, Ph.D., Trevor Gerlach, B.S., Paul Sirois, M.S., Mike Renter, B.S., David W. Crewz, M.S., and Richard C. Hill, M.A., Vet.M.B., Ph.D., M.R.C.V.S. Source: Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine, 41(4):594-602. 2010. Published By: American Association of Zoo Veterinarians DOI: 10.1638/2009-0118.1 URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.1638/2009-0118.1 BioOne (www.bioone.org) is an electronic aggregator of bioscience research content, and the online home to over 160 journals and books published by not-for-profit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne's Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/page/terms of use. Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non-commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research.
    [Show full text]
  • Seed Plant Models
    Review Tansley insight Why we need more non-seed plant models Author for correspondence: Stefan A. Rensing1,2 Stefan A. Rensing 1 2 Tel: +49 6421 28 21940 Faculty of Biology, University of Marburg, Karl-von-Frisch-Str. 8, 35043 Marburg, Germany; BIOSS Biological Signalling Studies, Email: stefan.rensing@biologie. University of Freiburg, Sch€anzlestraße 18, 79104 Freiburg, Germany uni-marburg.de Received: 30 October 2016 Accepted: 18 December 2016 Contents Summary 1 V. What do we need? 4 I. Introduction 1 VI. Conclusions 5 II. Evo-devo: inference of how plants evolved 2 Acknowledgements 5 III. We need more diversity 2 References 5 IV. Genomes are necessary, but not sufficient 3 Summary New Phytologist (2017) Out of a hundred sequenced and published land plant genomes, four are not of flowering plants. doi: 10.1111/nph.14464 This severely skewed taxonomic sampling hinders our comprehension of land plant evolution at large. Moreover, most genetically accessible model species are flowering plants as well. If we are Key words: Charophyta, evolution, fern, to gain a deeper understanding of how plants evolved and still evolve, and which of their hornwort, liverwort, moss, Streptophyta. developmental patterns are ancestral or derived, we need to study a more diverse set of plants. Here, I thus argue that we need to sequence genomes of so far neglected lineages, and that we need to develop more non-seed plant model species. revealed much, the exact branching order and evolution of the I. Introduction nonbilaterian lineages is still disputed (Lanna, 2015). Research on animals has for a long time relied on a number of The first (small) plant genome to be sequenced was of THE traditional model organisms, such as mouse, fruit fly, zebrafish or model plant, the weed Arabidopsis thaliana (c.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Common Native & Invasive Freshwater Plants in Alaska
    Introduction to Common Native & Potential Invasive Freshwater Plants in Alaska Cover photographs by (top to bottom, left to right): Tara Chestnut/Hannah E. Anderson, Jamie Fenneman, Vanessa Morgan, Dana Visalli, Jamie Fenneman, Lynda K. Moore and Denny Lassuy. Introduction to Common Native & Potential Invasive Freshwater Plants in Alaska This document is based on An Aquatic Plant Identification Manual for Washington’s Freshwater Plants, which was modified with permission from the Washington State Department of Ecology, by the Center for Lakes and Reservoirs at Portland State University for Alaska Department of Fish and Game US Fish & Wildlife Service - Coastal Program US Fish & Wildlife Service - Aquatic Invasive Species Program December 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgments ............................................................................ x Introduction Overview ............................................................................. xvi How to Use This Manual .................................................... xvi Categories of Special Interest Imperiled, Rare and Uncommon Aquatic Species ..................... xx Indigenous Peoples Use of Aquatic Plants .............................. xxi Invasive Aquatic Plants Impacts ................................................................................. xxi Vectors ................................................................................. xxii Prevention Tips .................................................... xxii Early Detection and Reporting
    [Show full text]
  • Rice-Fields. the Relevance of Cyanobacteria in the Ecosystem
    Limnetica 23(1-2) 11/10/04 10:15 Página 95 95 A shallow water ecosystem: rice-fields. The relevance of cyanobacteria in the ecosystem. Eduardo Fernández-Valiente* and Antonio Quesada Departamento de Biología. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, E-28049 Madrid, Spain * Corresponding author, tel: 34-914978186, fax: 34-914978344, email: [email protected] ABSTRACT In this paper we review the knowledge of the ecology of the largest freshwater ecosystem on Earth: the rice-fields, and in particular the rice-fields from Valencia (Spain) making a special consideration to the cyanobacteria present in this ecosystem. Rice-fields are artificial shallow aquatic ecosystems in which the land management and the agricultural practices together with the rice plant growth govern the major environmental variables affecting the aquatic biota and its relationships. Primary producers are dominated typically by macrophytic algae as Chara and cyanobacteria, both planktonic and benthic (beside the rice plants). Most rice-fields can be considered nutrient replete, since the fertilization inputs and the low ratio volume/surface make that main nutrients are typically available. Under these circumstances other environmental variables as photosynthetically active radiation availability or filtration rates and predation may explain the growth limitation of primary producers. Irradiance availability identify two periods within the cultivation cycle: when plants are short, irradiance is not limiting and some water chemistry variables (as pH, oxygen and dissolved inorganic C concentrations) change drastically as a function of the primary production; when plants are large and the canopy is intense, then irradiance is limiting and the water chemistry changes only slightly along the day.
    [Show full text]
  • Diet of the Antillean Manatee
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by NSU Works Nova Southeastern University NSUWorks Theses and Dissertations HCNSO Student Work 1-1-2014 Diet of the Antillean Manatee (Trichechus manatus manatus) in Belize, Central America Aarin Conrad Allen Nova Southeastern University Oceanographic Center, [email protected] This document is a product of extensive research conducted at the Nova Southeastern University Halmos College of Natural Sciences and Oceanography. For more information on research and degree programs at the NSU Halmos College of Natural Sciences and Oceanography, please click here. Follow this and additional works at: http://nsuworks.nova.edu/occ_stuetd Part of the Marine Biology Commons Share Feedback About This Item NSUWorks Citation Aarin Conrad Allen. 2014. Diet of the Antillean Manatee (Trichechus manatus manatus) in Belize, Central America. Master's thesis. Nova Southeastern University. Retrieved from NSUWorks, Oceanographic Center. (9) http://nsuworks.nova.edu/occ_stuetd/9. This Thesis is brought to you by the HCNSO Student Work at NSUWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of NSUWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 1 NOVA SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY OCEANOGRAPHIC CENTER Diet of the Antillean manatee (Trichechus manatus manatus) in Belize, Central America by Aarin Conrad Allen Submitted to the Faculty of Nova Southeastern University Oceanographic Center in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science with a specialty in: Marine Biology Nova Southeastern University 2014 2 Thesis of Aarin Conrad Allen Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Masters of Science: Marine Biology Nova Southeastern University Oceanographic Center April 2014 Approved: Thesis Committee Major Professor :______________________________ James D.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of Land Plants P
    Chapter 4. The evolutionary classification of land plants The evolutionary classification of land plants Land plants evolved from a group of green algae, possibly as early as 500–600 million years ago. Their closest living relatives in the algal realm are a group of freshwater algae known as stoneworts or Charophyta. According to the fossil record, the charophytes' growth form has changed little since the divergence of lineages, so we know that early land plants evolved from a branched, filamentous alga dwelling in shallow fresh water, perhaps at the edge of seasonally-desiccating pools. The biggest challenge that early land plants had to face ca. 500 million years ago was surviving in dry, non-submerged environments. Algae extract nutrients and light from the water that surrounds them. Those few algae that anchor themselves to the bottom of the waterbody do so to prevent being carried away by currents, but do not extract resources from the underlying substrate. Nutrients such as nitrogen and phosphorus, together with CO2 and sunlight, are all taken by the algae from the surrounding waters. Land plants, in contrast, must extract nutrients from the ground and capture CO2 and sunlight from the atmosphere. The first terrestrial plants were very similar to modern mosses and liverworts, in a group called Bryophytes (from Greek bryos=moss, and phyton=plants; hence “moss-like plants”). They possessed little root-like hairs called rhizoids, which collected nutrients from the ground. Like their algal ancestors, they could not withstand prolonged desiccation and restricted their life cycle to shaded, damp habitats, or, in some cases, evolved the ability to completely dry-out, putting their metabolism on hold and reviving when more water arrived, as in the modern “resurrection plants” (Selaginella).
    [Show full text]
  • Northamptonshire Biodiversity Records Centre NBRC Newsletter 20
    Northamptonshire Biodiversity Records Centre The home of quality ecological data in Northamptonshire NBRC Newsletter 20 Autumn/Winter 2020 You have been keeping us wonderfully busy with your submitted records of the species of Northamptonshire; the WILDside Recording Community has been a great home for sightings and support. You have not been stopped in noticing and supporting our local nature - recording in gardens, out on local exercise walks and further afield when restrictions allow. Our website has received over one thousand records, covering over five hundred taxa since the first lockdown began! Many of you will have noticed our website has had a re-vamp of late, shifting Beyond direct website submission, we know you also to the latest platform with SSL security, whilst submit directly to our county recorders (David James retaining all the recording features, ‘look out for’ recently reported over 25,000 butterfly records for surveys and resources to support local recording and 2020!) and via other online channels such as iRecord. ecological reporting. If you aren’t sure of which surveys we receive you can always check our annual report which lists our partners or ask the team [email protected]. Direct record submissions to our website or via our county recorders (as listed on our new resources for recorders page on the website) are generally processed more swiftly as we get all the needed parts and can contact you if required to complete a record. WILDside seems to have inspired us all to expand our recording repertoire. The ever-increasing taxonomic coverage in your submissions is fantastic to see! It seems many have used the wealth of virtual training at our fingertips this year through Wildlife Trust BCN Training Courses, the Field Studies Council and a host of others as can be seen through this wonderfully Thanks to the support of the Environment Agency, we compiled list of resources as put together by the have now launched our latest survey ‘Look out for South East Wales Biodiversity Records Centre.
    [Show full text]
  • Seventy Years of Changes in the Abundance of Danish Charophytes
    Freshwater Biology (2013) 58, 1682–1693 doi:10.1111/fwb.12159 Seventy years of changes in the abundance of Danish charophytes LARS BAASTRUP-SPOHR, LARS LØNSMANN IVERSEN, JEPPE DAHL-NIELSEN AND KAJ SAND-JENSEN Freshwater Biological Laboratory, Biological Institute, University of Copenhagen, Hillerød, Denmark SUMMARY 1. Charophytes grow attached to soft bottoms in ponds, streams, lakes and estuaries and are highly threatened throughout Europe according to the national Red Lists. We used Danish studies on fresh- water charophyte distributions conducted around 1940 and repeated measurements during recent years to evaluate the historical development of species richness and dominance patterns. We also tested to what extent historical changes of species abundance in 29 waterbodies were related to landscape features, water quality and species traits. 2. We found that three species of freshwater charophytes (Chara filiformis, Tolypella intricata and Nitella gracilis) have apparently disappeared from Denmark while one species (Chara connivens) has immigrated. National species richness has thus declined from 21 to 19 species. 3. Species abundance based on occurrence in many waterbodies followed a linear rank–log abun- dance relationship both in the historical and the recent studies. The dominance structure was stronger today than historically as common species have become relatively more abundant and uncommon species relatively rarer. 4. Among species traits, perenniality and preference for alkaline waters typical of deep-growing species in large alkaline lakes, a rare contemporary habitat, were significantly related to the historic species decline. Species increasing in abundance had wide tolerances to alkalinity and water nitrogen content. 5. Twenty-nine lakes and ponds studied repeatedly showed a significant decline of mean species richness from 3.4 to 2.4 during the 70 years.
    [Show full text]
  • The Genera Chara and Nitella
    Brazilian Journal of Botany 35(2):219-232, 2012 The genera Chara and Nitella (Chlorophyta, Characeae) in the subtropical Itaipu Reservoir, Brazil THAMIS MEURER1 and NORMA CATARINA BUENO1,2 (received: November 16, 2011; accepted: April 19, 2012) ABSTRACT – (The genera Chara and Nitella (Chlorophyta, Characeae) in the subtropical Itaipu Reservoir, Brazil). The family Characeae, represented by two genera in Brazil, Chara and Nitella, is considered to include the closest living relatives of land plants, and its members play important ecological role in aquatic ecosystems. The present taxonomic survey of Chara and Nitella was performed in tributaries that join to form the Brazilian shore of the Itaipu Reservoir on the Paraná River. Thirteen species were recorded, illustrated, and described: C. braunii var. brasiliensis R.Bicudo, C. guairensis R.Bicudo, N. acuminata A.Braun ex Wallman, N. furcata (Roxburgh ex Bruzileus) C.Agardh, and N. subglomerata A.Braun, already cited for the reservoir, and C. hydropitys Reichenbach, C. rusbyana Howe, N. axillaris A.Braun, N. glaziovii G.Zeller, N. gracilis (Smith) C.Agardh, N. hyalina (DC.) C.Agardh, N. inversa Imahori, and N. microcarpa A.Braun that represent new occurrences for the Itaipu Reservoir and Paraná State. Among the species encountered, C. guairensis, N. furcata, and N. glaziovii are widely distributed, while C. hydropitys and C. rusbyana have more restricted distributions. Key words - Charophyceae, macroalgae, submerged macrophyte, taxonomy INTRODUCTION C. braunii var. brasiliensis, C. diaphana, C. guairensis, and C. kenoyeri. Information regarding Nitella in the Characeae is a unique family of algae characterized Itaipu Reservoir is sparse, with the following species by the complexity of their morphological features, having previously been reported: N.
    [Show full text]
  • Key to Common Species of Stonewort
    KEY TO COMMON SPECIES OF STONEWORT 7 Spines sticking out from the stem, inclined more or less towards the centre of the internode, acute-tipped; (cortex even in width or with spine-bearing rows This key covers over 99% of stoneworts encountered in Britain and Ireland. Species narrower than those between) Chara hispida not included are Red Data Book or "near threatened". An asterisk indicates that a Spines appressed to stem with two of the three spines (not usually more than binocular microscope is normally required. A x20 hand lens is recommended for three) more or less pointing in opposite direction up and down the stem (in other characters. youngest, not fully expanded internodes the density of spines may push them in various directions), obtuse to acute-tipped; (spine-bearing rows much narrower 1 Main stem corticate, often spiny 2 than those between so that spines appear to be in furrows of stem) Chara rudis Main stem without cortex 8 (Non-corticate species have semi-translucent stems, like looking through a green 8 Branchlets apparently unbranched, but many with a minute tuft of 1-3 celled bottle; corticate species have more opaque stems with stripes of cells running branches at the ends, visible under a hand lens; plant robust (stem 1-3 mm down them.) diameter and internodes up to 10 cm long), translucent, usually more or less yellowish-green Nitella translucens 2 Spines and stipulodes well-developed and acute-tipped 4 Many branchlets conspicuously branched; plant slender to robust, usually grey- Spines, and usually stipulodes blunt-tipped or undeveloped 3 green, mid to dark green or black 9 (Spines are found on the main stem (cf.
    [Show full text]
  • Charophyte Variation in Sensitivity to Eutrophication Affects Their Potential for the Trophic and Ecological Status Indication
    Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst. 2021, 422, 30 Knowledge & © A. Kolada, Published by EDP Sciences 2021 Management of Aquatic https://doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2021030 Ecosystems Journal fully supported by Office www.kmae-journal.org français de la biodiversité RESEARCH PAPER Charophyte variation in sensitivity to eutrophication affects their potential for the trophic and ecological status indication Agnieszka Kolada* Institute of Environmental Protection – National Research Institute, Department of Freshwater Protection, Krucza 5/11D, 00-548 Warsaw, Poland Received: 9 June 2021 / Accepted: 23 July 2021 Abstract – Charophytes (stoneworts) form a group of macrophytes that are considered sensitive to eutrophication. The high indicator value of charophytes toward eutrophication results in their wide use in the bioassessment systems. I explored the variability of stonewort communities’ requirements for trophic conditions in lowland temperate lakes and attempted to determine the role of individual syntaxa in assessing the ecological status of lakes in Poland. The position of charophyte communities’ niches along the trophic gradient was analysed using the Outlying Mean Index approach. A few stonewort communities, i.e., Nitelletum opacae, N. mucronatae, N. flexilis and Charetum filiformis appeared to be specialised concerning water quality and may be considered indicators of habitats less eutrophic than the “mean” trophic conditions in the study domain. Most stonewort communities were relatively common in European waters. Four of them, i.e., Charetum tomentosae, C. asperae, C. contrariae and Nitellopsidetum obtusae, can be classified as ‘generalists’ with low marginality and broad ecological tolerance. Most stonewort communities appeared in a broad range of ecological status classes. In the case of 15 communities, 6 to 25% of occurrences were observed in lakes representing a less than good status, and they cannot be considered indicative of good ecological conditions.
    [Show full text]