DOCSLIB.ORG

Airport-Overland Corridor Plan.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Airport-Overland Corridor Plan.Pdf Airport / Overland Road Corridor Study Corridor Plan Project No. A009(990) Key No. 09990 July 2011 In partnership with Table of Contents ACRONYMS AND KEY TERMS ........................................................................................................................... V CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 1-1 1 What is the Corridor Study? ............................................................................................................................ 1-1 2 Who is involved? ............................................................................................................................................. 1-2 3 What is the study area?................................................................................................................................... 1-2 4 Why is the Corridor Study needed? ................................................................................................................ 1-4 5 Is the corridor consistent with future plans for the area? ................................................................................. 1-4 6 What is the Corridor Study process? ............................................................................................................... 1-5 CHAPTER 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS .............................................................................................................. 2-1 1 What are existing land uses in the area? ........................................................................................................ 2-1 2 What is the existing transportation network? ................................................................................................... 2-2 3 What are the existing traffic volumes? ............................................................................................................ 2-3 4 If there are no existing traffic congestion problems, why is a new corridor being considered? ....................... 2-4 5 What are the environmental constraints? ........................................................................................................ 2-6 CHAPTER 3 ALTERNATIVES EVALUATION & SCREENING ............................................................................... 3-1 1 What alternatives were considered? ............................................................................................................... 3-1 2 What evaluation criteria were developed?....................................................................................................... 3-2 3 How were the alternatives evaluated?............................................................................................................. 3-8 4 Which alternatives were eliminated and why? ............................................................................................... 3-11 5 What alternatives remained after the initial screening process? ................................................................... 3-12 CHAPTER 4 STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT .................................................................................................... 4-1 1 Who was involved in making decisions during the study? ............................................................................... 4-1 2 What opportunities were provided for public input? ......................................................................................... 4-2 ITD Project No. A009(990) July 2011 ii Table of Contents CHAPTER 5 PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE ........................................................................................................ 5-1 1 What is the preferred alternative? ................................................................................................................... 5-1 2 What level of traffic is the new corridor anticipated to carry? .......................................................................... 5-2 3 How wide will the roadway be? ....................................................................................................................... 5-9 4 Could the roadway be wider in the future? .................................................................................................... 5-10 5 How will the alignment be preserved? ........................................................................................................... 5-11 6 How will access be managed? ...................................................................................................................... 5-12 7 What would the intersections look like?......................................................................................................... 5-12 8 How is stormwater being addressed? ........................................................................................................... 5-15 9 Are there any unique physical characteristics along the alternative? ............................................................ 5-15 10 How much could the new roadway cost? ...................................................................................................... 5-23 CHAPTER 6 IMPLEMENTATION ...................................................................................................................... 6-1 1 What are the next steps? ................................................................................................................................ 6-1 2 What is the proposed alignment? .................................................................................................................... 6-1 3 When will the roadway be constructed? .......................................................................................................... 6-1 4 How will the Corridor Plan be implemented? ................................................................................................... 6-1 ITD Project No. A009(990) July 2011 Airport - Overland Road Corridor Preservation Study – Corridor Plan iii LIST OF EXHIBITS 1-1 Vicinity Map ..................................................................................................................................................... 1-3 1-2 Study Area ...................................................................................................................................................... 1-3 1-3 Corridor Study Process ................................................................................................................................... 1-6 2-1 Existing Roadway Network .............................................................................................................................. 2-3 3-1 Preliminary Alignment Alternatives .................................................................................................................. 3-3 3-2 ROW and Setback .......................................................................................................................................... 3-5 3-3 Evaluation Matrix ............................................................................................................................................. 3-9 3-4 Alternatives Screening Process .................................................................................................................... 3-11 5-1 2035 Projected Traffic Volumes (vehicles per day) ......................................................................................... 5-2 5-2 Preferred Alternative (Section 1 of 3) .............................................................................................................. 5-3 5-2 Preferred Alternative (Section 2 of 3) .............................................................................................................. 5-5 5-2 Preferred Alternative (Section 3 of 3) .............................................................................................................. 5-7 5-3 Three-Lane Roadway Section ......................................................................................................................... 5-9 5-4 Expanded Roadway Section ......................................................................................................................... 5-10 5-5 Expanded Section Impact Analysis ............................................................................................................... 5-11 5-6 Proposed Intersection Configurations ........................................................................................................... 5-13 5-7 Concept Drainage (Section 1 of 3) ................................................................................................................ 5-17 5-7 Concept Drainage (Section 2 of 3) ................................................................................................................ 5-19 5-7 Concept Drainage (Section 3 of 3) ................................................................................................................ 5-21 5-8 Opinion of Probable Cost .............................................................................................................................. 5-23 LIST OF APPENDICES APPENDIX A - Land Use Plan Summary Report APPENDIX B – Traffic Analysis APPENDIX C – Environmental Scan APPENDIX D – Evaluation & Screening APPENDIX E – Design Criteria APPENDIX F – Concept Drainage APPENDIX G – Cost Estimate APPENDIX H – Public Involvement APPENDIX
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 5. RECOMMENDED PROJECTS Residents Noted Crossing Issues at a Few Specific Intersections
    Boise Central Bench Neighborhood Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan 5. RECOMMENDED PROJECTS residents noted crossing issues at a few specific intersections. Each intersection will require its own This chapter discusses project recommendations for the review to determine the most appropriate treatment. Central Bench’s pedestrian and bicycle network. These Lighting at intersections should be carefully considered. infrastructure improvements are intended to enhance pedestrian/bicycle access and circulation as well as help Table 3 provides further information on each project identi- pedestrians and bicyclists feel more comfortable traveling fied in Figure 16. Projects in Table 3 are listed alphabetically within and through the Central Bench. This chapter focuses under their respective neighborhood association and road- on engineering and infrastructure improvements. way functional classification. The table indicates if the proj- The majority of the projects were identified by members of ect is also included in one of the previous plans described in the public and agency stakeholders through the outreach Chapter 2. Many of the projects in Table 3 will be evaluated process. Several projects have been previously identified in using ACHD’s Community Programs prioritization process. the Roadways to Bikeways Plan or other planning documents. This process considers a range of factors (e.g., proximity to schools, major roads, available funding, city or school dis- PEDESTRIAN PROJECTS trict support, etc.). Appendix ‘B’ contains more information on this process, as well as the results of applying the techni- Figure 16 shows the recommended set of projects to improve cal criteria to the projects below. Note that scoring in Appen- the existing pedestrian network in the Boise Central Bench dix ‘B’ does not represent a complete or final prioritization study area.
    [Show full text]
  • EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Nampa PY2012-2016 Consolidated Plan
    EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Nampa PY2012‐2016 Consolidated Plan This document is the Five‐year Consolidated Plan for the City of Nampa, covering program years 2012 through 2016. The Consolidated Plan is a requirement of cities that receive community development and housing block grant funds from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). Consolidated Plans are required to be prepared every three to five years. HUD also requires annual spending plans and funding allocation reports (Annual Action Plan and Consolidated Annual Performance Report). The purpose of the Consolidated Plan is: 1. To identify a city’s or state’s housing and community development needs, priorities, goals and strategies; and 2. To stipulate how funds will be allocated to housing and community development activities. The City is a recipient of the Community Development Block Grant, or CDBG, funding. It should be noted that HUD is in the process of changing the submission requirements for the Consolidated Plan. This effort will make electronic submission more feasible and combine the Consolidated Plan with the data reported in the Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER). At the time this document was prepared, HUD has not released its new Consolidated Plan submission tool. As such, this Consolidated Plan was completed using the current, narrative format. The City of Nampa understands that its Action Plans for the PY2012‐2016 reporting period will be completed using the new format once it is released. In addition to the Consolidated Plan, HUD requires that cities and states receiving CDBG funding take actions to affirmatively further fair housing choice.
    [Show full text]
  • December 20, 2017
    December 20, 2017 St. Clairsville, Ohio December 20, 2017 The Board of Commissioners of Belmont County, Ohio, met this day in regular session. Present: Mark A. Thomas, J. P. Dutton and Josh Meyer, Commissioners and Bonnie Zuzak, Assistant Clerk of the Board. MEETINGS ARE NOW BEING RECORDED ALL DISCUSSIONS ARE SUMMARIZED. FOR COMPLETE PROCEEDINGS PLEASE SEE CORRESPONDING CD FOR THIS MEETING DAY. IN THE MATTER OF APPROVING RECAPITULATION OF VOUCHERS FOR THE VARIOUS FUNDS Motion made by Mr. Thomas, seconded by Mr. Dutton to approve and sign all bills that have been certified in the Auditor's office and considered by the Board. It is hereby ordered that the County Auditor issue his warrant on the County Treasurer in payment of the bills allowed: IN THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF $599,857.13 Upon roll call the vote was as follows: Mr. Thomas Yes Mr. Dutton Yes Mr. Meyer Yes IN THE MATTER OF TRANSFERS WITHIN FUND Motion made by Mr. Thomas, seconded by Mr. Meyer to approve the following transfers within fund for the following funds: A00 GENERAL FUND FROM TO AMOUNT E-0061-A002-B02.002 Salaries-Employees E-0061-A002-B12.000 Other Expenses $11,670.00 E-0181-A003-A11.000 Other Expenses E-0180-A003-A01.001 Salary-Board Members $78.96 E10 911 FROM TO AMOUNT E-2200-E010-E07.000 Other Expenses E-2200-E010-E15.074 Transfers Out $16,194.51 P05 WWS #3 REV FUND/BCSSD FROM TO AMOUNT E-3702-P005-P25.000 Purchased Water E-3702-P005-P21.000 Materials $5,000.00 S12 BEL.
    [Show full text]
  • TO CONSIGNORS Hip Color Year No
    INDEX TO CONSIGNORS Hip Color Year No. Name Sex Foaled Sire Dam ABBIE ROAD FARM (LISA MCGREEVY), AGENT I Barn 1 211 ................................. ......dk. b./br. f......2012 Belong to Me..............Rhythm Gal 485 ................................. ......ch. f. ..............2012 Circular Quay.............Calling On Angels ABBIE ROAD FARM (LISA MCGREEVY), AGENT II Barn 1 385 Keeping It Real.............b. c................2012 In Summation.............Wild Princess ABBIE ROAD FARM (LISA MCGREEVY), AGENT III Barn 1 203 Relentless Girl...............ch. f. ..............2012 Concerto.....................Relentless Storm 418 Lonesome Jay ..............ch. c. .............2012 Concerto.....................Allison's Eyes 567 Emerging Wind.............b. f. ................2012 In Summation.............Emerging Cloud ABBIE ROAD FARM (LISA MCGREEVY), AGENT V Barn 1 599 Urge...............................dk. b./br. f......2012 Purge ..........................Freei ABBIE ROAD FARM (LISA MCGREEVY), AGENT VI Barn 1 399 ................................. ......b. f. ................2012 Notional ......................Above Average 513 Cool Coal Lady.............b. f. ................2012 Cool Coal Man...........Citi Music ABBIE ROAD FARM (LISA MCGREEVY), AGENT VII Barn 1 525 ................................. ......ch. f. ..............2012 Noonmark...................Costly Emotion ABBIE ROAD FARM (LISA MCGREEVY), AGENT VIII Barn 1 427 ................................. ......ch. c. .............2012 Old Fashioned ...........Andora Springs ABBIE
    [Show full text]
  • 39324 23-10 Nationalgazette
    Government Gazette Staatskoerant REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA REPUBLIEK VAN SUID AFRIKA Regulation Gazette No. 10177 Regulasiekoerant October Vol. 604 23 2015 No. 39324 Oktober PART 1 OF 2 ISSN 1682-5843 N.B. The Government Printing Works will 39324 not be held responsible for the quality of “Hard Copies” or “Electronic Files” submitted for publication purposes 9 771682 584003 AIDS HELPLINE: 0800-0123-22 Prevention is the cure 2 No. 39324 GOVERNMENT GAZETTE, 23 OCTOBER 2015 IMPORTANT I nfarmai,o-w from Government Printing Works Dear Valued Customers, Government Printing Works has implemented rules for completing and submitting the electronic Adobe Forms when you, the customer, submits your notice request. Please take note of these guidelines when completing your form. GPW Business Rules 1. No hand written notices will be accepted for processing, this includes Adobe ,-..,. forms which have been completed by hand. 2. Notices can only be submitted in Adobe electronic form format to the email submission address submit.egazette @gpw.gov.za. This means that any notice submissions not on an Adobe electronic form that are submitted to this mailbox will be rejected. National or Provincial gazette notices, where the Z95 or Z95Prov must be an Adobe form but the notice content (body) will be an attachment. 3. Notices brought into GPW by "walk -in" customers on electronic media can only be submitted in Adobe electronic form format. This means that any notice submissions not on an Adobe electronic form that are submitted by the customer on electronic media will be rejected. National or Provincial gazette notices, where the Z95 or Z95Prov must be an Adobe form but the notice content (body) will be an attachment.
    [Show full text]
  • Iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiin Wo 2011/161427 A3 Wo 2011/161427
    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization International Bureau IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIN (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date WO 2011/161427 A3 29 December 2011 (29.12.2011) PCT (51) International Patent Classification: (81) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every A61K 38/17 (2006.01) A61P 5/50 (2006.01) kind of national protection available): AE, AG, AL, AM, A61P 3/10 (2006.01) A61P 21/00 (2006.01) AO, AT, AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG, BH, BR, BW, BY, BZ, A61P 3/04 (2006.01) CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DK, DM, DO, DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, (21) International Application Number: HN, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IS, JP, KE, KG, KM, KN, KP, PCT/GB2011/000966 KR, KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LT, LU, LY, MA, MD, (22) International Filing Date: ME, MG, MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, 27 June 2011 (27.06.2011) NO, NZ, OM, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, RO, RS, RU, SC, SD, SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TH, TJ, TM, TN, TR, (25) Filing Language: English TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM, ZW. (26) Publication Language: English (84) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every (30) Priority Data: kind of regional protection available): ARIPO (BW, GH, 61/358,596 25 June 2010 (25.06.2010) US GM, KE, LR, LS, MW, MZ, NA, SD, SL, SZ, TZ, UG, 61/384,652 20 September 2010 (20.09.2010) US ZM, ZW), Eurasian (AM, AZ, BY, KG, KZ, MD, RU, TJ, 61/420,677 7 December 2010 (07.12.2010) US TM), European (AL, AT, BE, BG, CH, CY, CZ, DE, DK, EE, ES, FI, FR, GB, GR, HR, HU, IE, IS, IT, LT, LU, (71) Applicant (for all designated States except US): ASTON LV, MC, MK, MT, NL, NO, PL, PT, RO, RS, SE, SI, SK, UNIVERSITY [GB/GB]; Aston Triangle, Birmingham SM, TR), OAPI (BF, BJ, CF, CG, CI, CM, GA, GN, GQ, B4 7ET (GB).
    [Show full text]
  • UFC) Started in 1993 As a Mixed Martial Arts (MMA) Tournament on Pay‐Per‐View to Determine the World’S Greatest Martial Arts Style
    Mainstream Expansion and Strategic Analysis Ram Kandasamy Victor Li David Ye Contents 1 Introduction 2 Market Analysis 2.1 Overview 2.2 Buyers 2.3 Fighters 2.4 Substitutes 2.5 Complements 3 Competitive Analysis 3.1 Entry 3.2 Strengths 3.3 Weaknesses 3.4 Competitors 4 Strategy Analysis 4.1 Response to Competitors 4.2 Gymnasiums 4.3 International Expansion 4.4 Star Promotion 4.5 National Television 5 Conclusion 6 References 1 1. Introduction The Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) started in 1993 as a mixed martial arts (MMA) tournament on pay‐per‐view to determine the world’s greatest martial arts style. Its main draw was its lack of rules. Weight classes did not exist and rounds continued until one of the competitors got knocked out or submitted to his opponent. Although the UFC initially achieved underground success, it was regarded more as a spectacle than a sport and never attained mainstream popularity. The perceived brutality of the event led to political scrutiny and pressure. Attacks from critics caused the UFC to establish a set of unified rules with greater emphasis placed on the safety. The UFC also successfully petitioned to become sanctioned by the Nevada State Athletic Commission. However, these changes occurred too late to have an impact and by 2001, the parent organization of the UFC was on the verge of bankruptcy. The brand was sold to Zuffa LLC, marking the beginning of the UFC’s dramatic rise in popularity. Over the next eight years, the UFC evolved from its underground roots into the premier organization of a rapidly growing sport.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning Commission Agenda Packet July 03, 2012
    City of Norfolk PLANNING COMMISSION 701 KOENIGSTEIN AVENUE 402-844-2050 NORFOLK, NEBRASKA 68701 402-644-8748 FAX NOTICE This is your official notice of the Tuesday, July 3, 2012 meeting of the Norfolk Planning Commission which will be held in the City of Norfolk Council Chambers, 309 Madison Avenue, Norfolk, NE 68701. AGENDA 7:30 a.m. Call meeting to order Chair Snodgrass, presiding. 1. Roll call. 2. Proof of Publication and informing public of location of Open Meetings Act. 3. Action on agenda and notice of the July 3, 2012 meeting. 4. Action on minutes of the June 19, 2012 regular meeting/public hearing. CURRENT BUSINESS 5. Discussion and action on the request of W. Theisen Grading & Equipment for a Conditional Use Permit for soil extraction east of Victory Road on Eisenhower Avenue. (Public hearing held June 19, 2012) 6. Discussion and action on the request of Scrap Mart, LLC for a Conditional Use Permit for a scrap metal processing facility east of Victory Road on Eisenhower Avenue. (Public hearing held June 19, 2012) 7. Discussion and action on the request to rescind Conditional Use Permit 2011-PC, permitting storage of broken concrete, asphalt and brick east of Victory Road and Eisenhower Avenue. The resolution was approved May 17, 2011 and granted to W. Theisen Grading and Equipment. 8. Discussion and action on the final plan of the Amendment to Amended Warren Planned Development. (Hearing held May 22, 2012) PLATS 9. Eisenhower Industrial Addition-Final Plat PUBLIC HEARINGS 10. Public hearing at the request of Alter Trading Corporation for a Conditional Use Permit for a salvage yard with a shredder at 500 Washington Avenue.
    [Show full text]
  • SWT Housing Newsletter 2020
    WINTER 2020 Housing News Great Homes for Local Communities Introduction from Cllr Francesca Smith (Housing Portfolio Holder) Welcome to our December issue of the Somerset West and Taunton Housing Newsletter. Going forward we intend to produce a newsletter for you to read every quarter. The next one will be due in spring and you can also find this newsletter online at www.somersetwestandtaunton.gov.uk. We have all been through so much this year, especially with lockdowns during the year. Just as we were gaining momentum after the first lockdown, we had to lock down again. We will of course continue to support our residents during the global pandemic and reduce the risk of spreading the coronavirus. Despite, the difficulties this year, the Housing Directorate has continued to deliver against their objectives of delivering more new homes, providing great customer services and improving our existing homes and neighbourhoods. I hope you enjoy reading about the great things that have been achieved in this edition. The future of Local Government still remains subject to change and I wrote to you in November to make you aware of those changes. You may wish to look through the “Stronger Somerset” (www. strongersomerset.co.uk) and “One Council” (www.onesomerset.org.uk) information to familiarise yourself with the current situation. Lastly but certainly not least “I wish you all a very Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year!” Annual Report 2019/2020 Highlights 83% of our Deane Helpline Our Debt & customers rated the service Benefit Advisor they received as excellent helped 444 tenants We spent 7.9 million repairing, maintaining and We completed 41 major improving your homes and disability adaptations and communal areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Massachusetts Licensed Motor Vehicle Damage Appraisers - Individuals September 05, 2021
    COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS DIVISION OF INSURANCE PRODUCER LICENSING 1000 Washington Street, Suite 810 Boston, MA 02118-6200 FAX (617) 753-6883 http://www.mass.gov/doi Massachusetts Licensed Motor Vehicle Damage Appraisers - Individuals September 05, 2021 License # Licensure Individual Address City State Zip Phone # 1 007408 01/01/1977 Abate, Andrew Suffolk AutoBody, Inc., 25 Merchants Dr #3 Walpole MA 02081 0-- 0 2 014260 11/24/2003 Abdelaziz, Ilaj 20 Vine Street Lexington MA 02420 0-- 0 3 013836 10/31/2001 Abkarian, Khatchik H. Accurate Collision, 36 Mystic Street Everett MA 02149 0-- 0 4 016443 04/11/2017 Abouelfadl, Mohamed N Progressive Insurance, 2200 Hartford Ave Johnston RI 02919 0-- 0 5 016337 08/17/2016 Accolla, Kevin 109 Sagamore Ave Chelsea MA 02150 0-- 0 6 010790 10/06/1987 Acloque, Evans P Liberty Mutual Ins Co, 50 Derby St Hingham MA 02018 0-- 0 7 017053 06/01/2021 Acres, Jessica A 0-- 0 8 009557 03/01/1982 Adam, Robert W 0-- 0 West 9 005074 03/01/1973 Adamczyk, Stanley J Western Mass Collision, 62 Baldwin Street Box 401 MA 01089 0-- 0 Springfield 10 013824 07/31/2001 Adams, Arleen 0-- 0 11 014080 11/26/2002 Adams, Derek R Junior's Auto Body, 11 Goodhue Street Salem MA 01970 0-- 0 12 016992 12/28/2020 Adams, Evan C Esurance, 31 Peach Farm Road East Hampton CT 06424 0-- 0 13 006575 03/01/1975 Adams, Gary P c/o Adams Auto, 516 Boston Turnpike Shrewsbury MA 01545 0-- 0 14 013105 05/27/1997 Adams, Jeffrey R Rodman Ford Coll Ctr, Route 1 Foxboro MA 00000 0-- 0 15 016531 11/21/2017 Adams, Philip Plymouth Rock Assurance, 901 Franklin Ave Garden City NY 11530 0-- 0 16 015746 04/25/2013 Adams, Robert Andrew Country Collision, 20 Myricks St Berkley MA 02779 0-- 0 17 013823 07/31/2001 Adams, Rymer E 0-- 0 18 013999 07/30/2002 Addesa, Carmen E Arbella Insurance, 1100 Crown Colony Drive Quincy MA 02169 0-- 0 19 014971 03/04/2008 Addis, Andrew R Progressive Insurance, 300 Unicorn Park Drive 4th Flr Woburn MA 01801 0-- 0 20 013761 05/10/2001 Adie, Scott L.
    [Show full text]
  • SALT LAKE CITY HISTORIC LANDSCAPES REPORT Executive Summary
    SALT LAKE CITY HISTORIC LANDSCAPES REPORT Executive Summary Warms Springs Park SLCHLR NO. 26 Warm Springs Park is located within the Capitol Hill National Historic District in Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah. It fronts on Beck Street (300 West) and Wall Street at 840 North Beck Street. The Warm Springs Park landscape is not considered historic in and of itself; however, it has historic significance because of the recognition of the area encompassing the historic warm springs; and its association with past building site(s) including the original 1922 Warm Springs Municipal Bathhouse located directly to the north. Warm Springs Park was established as a neighborhood park in 1925. The nine-acre park is bordered by Beck Street to the west, Wall Street to the southwest, Victory Road to the east, the historic warm springs site and North Gateway Park to the north, and an electrical substation to the south. The park site is relatively flat, nestled into the lower slopes of West Capitol Hill. Victory Road is several stories higher than the park site, tracing the terrain of the hill. A mix of commercial and light industrial uses are located on the opposite side of Beck Street, with a mix of single-family and higher-density residential uses dominating the Wall Street environment and neighborhoods to the south. There are numerous historic residences in the vicinity of the park particularly to the south. The park is accessed from Beck Street (300 West) and Wall Street. The park is divided into three character-defining sections: Northern Entrance & Tennis Courts, Open Park and Southern Entrance & Playground.
    [Show full text]
  • Media Approved
    Film and Video Labelling Body Media Approved Video Titles Title Rating Source Time Date Format Applicant Point of Sales Approved Director Cuts 10,000 B.C. (2 Disc Special Edition) M Contains medium level violence FVLB 105.00 28/09/2010 DVD The Warehouse Roland Emmerich No cut noted Slick Yes 28/09/2010 18 Year Old Russians Love Anal R18 Contains explicit sex scenes OFLC 125.43 21/09/2010 DVD Calvista NZ Ltd Max Schneider No cut noted Slick Yes 21/09/2010 28 Days Later R16 Contains violence,offensive language and horror FVLB 113.00 22/09/2010 Blu-ray Roadshow Entertainment Danny Boyle No cut noted Awaiting POS No 27/09/2010 4.3.2.1 R16 Contains violence,offensive language and sex scenes FVLB 111.55 22/09/2010 DVD Universal Pictures Video Noel Clarke/Mark Davis No cut noted 633 Squadron G FVLB 91.00 28/09/2010 DVD The Warehouse Walter E Grauman No cut noted Slick Yes 28/09/2010 7 Hungry Nurses R18 Contains explicit sex scenes OFLC 99.17 08/09/2010 DVD Calvista NZ Ltd Thierry Golyo No cut noted Slick Yes 08/09/2010 8 1/2 Women R18 Contains sexual references FVLB 120.00 15/09/2010 DVD Vendetta Films Peter Greenaway No cut noted Slick Yes 15/09/2010 AC/DC Highway to Hell A Classic Album Under Review PG Contains coarse language FVLB 78.00 07/09/2010 DVD Vendetta Films Not Stated No cut noted Slick Yes 07/09/2010 Accidents Happen M Contains drug use and offensive language FVLB 88.00 13/09/2010 DVD Roadshow Entertainment Andrew Lancaster No cut noted Slick Yes 13/09/2010 Acting Shakespeare Ian McKellen PG FVLB 86.00 02/09/2010 DVD Roadshow Entertainment
    [Show full text]