Crystal Structure of the Drosophila Mago Nashi–Y14 Complex
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Downloaded from genesdev.cshlp.org on September 30, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press RESEARCH COMMUNICATION trol. The EJC appears to be a dynamic complex, as the Crystal structure of the composition of EJC varies at different stages of splicing Drosophila Mago nashi–Y14 and export, and various EJC components associate with the spliced mRNA with different affinities (Reichert et complex al. 2002). Two proteins, a human homolog of Drosophila 1,2 1,3 mago nashi, Magoh, and Y14, stably associate with Hang Shi and Rui-Ming Xu spliced mRNAs in the nucleus and in the cytoplasm, and 1W.M. Keck Structural Biology Laboratory, Cold Spring they are thought to be part of the core EJC (Kataoka et al. Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York 11724, 2001; Le Hir et al. 2001a). Here, we focus our study on USA; 2Department of Physics, University of Massachusetts at Drosophila Mago and Y14 proteins. Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts 01002, USA Both Mago and Y14 are highly conserved from Saccha- romyces pombe to human (Fig. 1A,B). In Drosophila me- Pre-mRNA splicing is essential for generating mature lanogaster, both Mago and Y14 are essential for viability mRNA and is also important for subsequent mRNA ex- and required for correct localization of oskar mRNA at port and quality control. The splicing history is im- the posterior pole (Micklem et al. 1997; Newmark et al. printed on spliced mRNA through the deposition of a splic- 1997; Hachet and Ephrussi 2001; Le Hir et al. 2001a), which is critical for generating cell asymmetry and ing-dependent multiprotein complex, the exon junction ∼ specification during embryonic development. Mago in- complex (EJC), at 20 nucleotides upstreamof exon–exon teracts with Y14 stably in vitro and in vivo (Zhao et al. junctions. The EJC is a dynamic structure containing pro- 2000; Hachet and Ephrussi 2001; Kataoka et al. 2001; Le teins functioning in the nuclear export and nonsense-me- Hir et al. 2001a; Mingot et al. 2001). Magoh has also been diated decay of spliced mRNAs. Mago nashi (Mago) and shown to interact with the mRNA export factor TAP Y14 are core components of the EJC, and they form a stable (Kataoka et al. 2001). Y14 is a putative RNA-binding pro- heterodimer that strongly associates with spliced mRNA. tein that shuttles between the nucleus and the cyto- Here we report a 1.85 Å-resolution structure of the Dro- plasm (Kataoka et al. 2000; Mingot et al. 2001). It inter- sophila Mago–Y14 complex. Surprisingly, the structure acts with TAP and other EJC components REF/Aly, shows that the canonical RNA-binding surface of the RNPS1, and hUpf3 (Kataoka et al. 2001; Kim et al. 2001a). The two proteins are stably associated with Y14 RNA recognition motif (RRM) is involved in exten- mRNAs during the export from the nucleus to the cyto- sive protein–protein interactions with Mago. This unex- plasm (Kataoka et al. 2001; Kim et al. 2001b; Le Hir et al. pected finding provides important insights for under- 2001a), and this association persists until the first round standing the molecular mechanisms of EJC assembly of translation (Dostie and Dreyfuss 2002). and RRM-mediated protein–protein interactions. A great deal about the function of Mago and Y14 in Received January 15, 2003; revised version accepted February EJC assembly, mRNA export and decay has been learned 28, 2003. from recent studies. However, the molecular mecha- nisms of the Mago–Y14 interaction and their interac- tions with mRNA and other EJC components are still Pre-mRNA splicing is coupled with subsequent cellular poorly understood. To understand the structural basis of processes including export and nonsense-mediated decay Mago(h)–Y14 interaction and the mode of protein–RNA (NMD) of spliced mRNAs (Maquat and Carmichael interaction, we have solved a 1.85 Å resolution structure 2001; Dreyfuss et al. 2002; Reed and Hurt 2002; Wagner of a Drosophila Mago–Y14 complex. The structure reveals and Lykke-Andersen 2002). Splicing deposits a multipro- a novel mode of Mago–Y14 interaction through the RNA- tein complex, known as the exon junction complex binding surface of the Y14 RRM (RNA recognition motif), (EJC), on spliced mRNAs at a position ∼20 nucleotides which has important implications for understanding pro- upstream of the exon–exon junctions. These EJC pro- tein–RNA and protein–protein interactions of the EJC. teins have important functions in determining the fate of spliced mRNAs (Kataoka et al. 2000; Le Hir et al. Results and Discussion 2000a,b, 2001b; Kim et al. 2001b). To date, at least eight EJC proteins have been identified. They include Y14, Recombinant Mago–Y14 complex was produced in Esch- Mago, DEK, RNPS1, SRm160, Upf3, UAP56, and REF/ erichia coli by coexpression. Purified Mago–Y14 com- Aly (Mayeda et al. 1999; Kataoka et al. 2000, 2001; Le Hir plex exists as a 1:1 heterodimer in solution as judged by et al. 2000a, 2001a; McGarvey et al. 2000; Zhou et al. dynamic laser scattering (data not shown). Purified Ma- 2000; Hachet and Ephrussi 2001; Kim et al. 2001a; Luo et go–Y14 complex was subjected to endoproteinase Glu-C treatment to produce a core complex containing the full- al. 2001; Lykke-Andersen et al. 2001). These proteins ⌬ have been shown to have distinct and sometimes mul- length Mago and a truncated Y14, Y14 , lacking 46 tiple functions in various aspects of mRNA metabolism amino acids at the N terminus and 10 amino acids at the such as splicing, nuclear export, and mRNA quality con- C terminus as revealed by mass spectrometric analyses (data not shown). The crystal structure of the Mago– Y14⌬ complex was solved by seleno-methionyl (SeMet) [Keywords: Mago; Y14; RNA recognition motif; splicing; nuclear export; multiwavelength anomalous diffraction (MAD; Fig. 1C,D). nonsense-mediated decay] 3 The refined structure contains all but three N-terminal Corresponding author. residues of Mago and amino acids 61–155 of Y14, encom- E-MAIL [email protected]; FAX (516) 367-8873. Article and publication are at http://www.genesdev.org/cgi/doi/10.1101/ passing the entire RRM domain. Detailed statistics of gad.260403. the crystallographic analysis are shown in Table 1. GENES & DEVELOPMENT 17:971–976 © 2003 by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press ISSN 0890-9369/03 $5.00; www.genesdev.org 971 Downloaded from genesdev.cshlp.org on September 30, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Shi and Xu The structure of Y14 Y14 contains a central RRM flanked by highly charged N- and C-terminal regions. As expected, our crystal structure shows that Y14 contains a canonical RRM (amino acids. 72–149), which consists of a four-stranded antiparallel -sheet (1–4) and two helices (␣A, ␣B) in a 1–␣A–2–3–␣B–4 arrangement (Fig. 2A,B). The Y14 RRM structure can be superimposed with the structure of the N-terminal RRM of U1A (Oubridge et al. 1994) with a root-mean-squared deviation of 0.62Å using the C ␣ po- sitions of 23 residues located on 1–4 for alignment. Most notable differences lie within the loop connecting 2and 3, and regions outside of the RRM fold. These differences are not unusual, though, as they are the most variable re- gions among different RRMs (Varani and Nagai 1998). The loop connecting 2and 3 interacts with RNA in some RRMs, and conformational differences of this loop be- tween native and RNA-bound forms have been docu- mented. The N- and C-terminal extensions to many RRMs are normally disordered in the absence of RNA but become ordered upon nucleic acid binding. In the Mago–Y14⌬ Figure 1. Sequence conservation and structure determination of structure, both regions are stabilized by hydrogen bonding Drosophila Mago nashi and Y14. (A) Sequence alignment of Dro- between residues located at the two termini. For example, sophila melanogaster (dmMGN), human (hsMGN), and S. pombe the two termini interact via mainchain hydrogen bonding (spMGN) Mago proteins. Identical residues among all three species of Pro 65–Lys 152and Glu 67–Phe 150. In addition, the are highlighted in cyan, and similar residues are highlighted in yel- low. Every 10 residues are indicated with a “+” above the sequence. packing of Trp 73, Pro 66, His 124, and Trp 148 provides Secondary structural elements, determined from the crystallo- major stabilization of the terminal regions of Y14. graphic analysis, and their nomenclatures are shown above the se- The most conserved regions in the RRM are the RNP2 quence. (B) Sequence alignment of Y14 proteins of the same three and RNP1 sequence motifs located on 1 and 3, respec- species. The same criteria and color code as above are used to indi- tively. In all of the RRM–RNA complex structures known cate sequence homology. RNP1 and RNP2sequence motifs are un- to date, the -sheet forms an RNA-binding platform, and derlined and labeled in magenta. Identical residues between Dro- sophila and human Y14 proteins that are not included in the crys- the aromatic residues in the RNP2and RNP1 motifs stack tallized fragment are shown in cyan letters. (C) A section of the 2.8 with RNA bases (Perez-Canadillas and Varani 2001). Y14 Å MAD phased electron density map. The map is calculated using has a perfectly conserved RNP2motif, but a highly con- the RESOLVE program and displayed using O at 1.2 contour level. served aromatic residue in RNP1 (most frequently a phe- The refined 1.85 Å structure is superimposed as a bond model. (D) The nylalanine) is absent. Instead, a leucine (Leu 118) occupies 1.85 Å 2F -F map of the same region contoured at 1.5 level.