DOCSLIB.ORG

NI 43-101 Technical Report Green River Potash Project Grand County, Utah, USA

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
NI 43-101 Technical Report Green River Potash Project Grand County, Utah, USA 778-01 NI 43-101 Technical Report Green River Potash Project Grand County, Utah, USA Prepared for Prepared by Leo J. Gilbride, P.E. Vanessa Santos, P.G. 10 July 2012 Effective date 27 June 2012 AGAPITO ASSOCIATES, INC. 715 Horizon Dr., Ste. 340, Grand Junction, CO 81506 970/242-4220 • FAX 970/245-9234 1726 Cole Blvd., Building 22, Suite 130, Golden, CO 80401 303/271-3750 • FAX 303/271-3891 www.agapito.com NI 43-101 Technical Report, Green River Potash Project, Grand County, Utah, USA Prepared for Magna Resources Ltd. 10 July 2012 Page i NI 43-101 TECHNICAL REPORT GREEN RIVER POTASH PROJECT GRAND COUNTY, UTAH USA Leo J. Gilbride, P.E. Vanessa Santos, P.G. Agapito Associates, Inc. 715 Horizon Drive, Suite 340 Grand Junction, Colorado 81506 USA Effective Date: 27 June 2012 Prepared For: Magna Resources Ltd. 1220 Oceanic Plaza 1066 Hastings St. Vancouver, BC V6E 3X1 CANADA Agapito Associates, Inc. NI 43-101 Technical Report, Green River Potash Project, Grand County, Utah, USA Prepared for Magna Resources Ltd. 10 July 2012 Page ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 SUMMARY ............................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Property Description ......................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Tenure and Surface Rights ................................................................................ 1-2 1.3 Geology ............................................................................................................. 1-3 1.4 Exploration Targets ........................................................................................... 1-4 1.5 Conclusions ....................................................................................................... 1-4 1.6 Recommendations ............................................................................................. 1-6 2.0 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Terms of Reference ........................................................................................... 2-2 2.1.1 Units ...................................................................................................... 2-3 2.1.2 Acronyms and Abbreviations ............................................................... 2-3 3.0 RELIANCE ON OTHER EXPERTS ........................................................................ 3-1 3.1 Mineral Tenure .................................................................................................. 3-1 3.2 Surface Rights, Access, Permitting, and Environmental .................................. 3-1 3.3 Seismic .............................................................................................................. 3-1 4.0 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION ..................................................... 4-1 4.1 Location ............................................................................................................ 4-1 4.2 Mineral Tenure and Agreements ...................................................................... 4-1 4.2.1 State of Utah Potash and Lithium Leases ............................................. 4-1 4.2.2 Federal Potash Prospecting Permit Applications .................................. 4-5 4.2.3 Federal Placer Mining Claims .............................................................. 4-9 4.3 Environmental Liability .................................................................................... 4-9 5.0 ACCESSIBILITY, CLIMATE, LOCAL RESOURCES, INFRASTRUCTURE AND PHYSIOGRAPHY ......................................................... 5-1 5.1 Access ............................................................................................................... 5-1 5.2 Climate .............................................................................................................. 5-1 5.3 Local Resources and Infrastructure .................................................................. 5-1 5.4 Physiography..................................................................................................... 5-2 6.0 HISTORY .................................................................................................................. 6-1 7.0 GEOLOGIC SETTING AND MINERALIZATION ................................................ 7-1 7.1 Regional Stratigraphy ....................................................................................... 7-4 7.2 Regional Structure ............................................................................................ 7-6 7.3 Property Geology .............................................................................................. 7-8 Agapito Associates, Inc. NI 43-101 Technical Report, Green River Potash Project, Grand County, Utah, USA Prepared for Magna Resources Ltd. 10 July 2012 Page iii 7.3.1 Stratigraphy ........................................................................................... 7-8 7.3.2 Structure ................................................................................................ 7-8 7.3.3 Mineralization ..................................................................................... 7-10 8.0 DEPOSIT TYPES ..................................................................................................... 8-1 9.0 EXPLORATION ........................................................................................................ 9-1 9.1 Seismic .............................................................................................................. 9-1 10.0 DRILLING .............................................................................................................. 10-1 10.1 Electrical Logs for Potash Definition ............................................................. 10-1 10.2 Potash Picks from Electric Logs ..................................................................... 10-3 10.2.1 Cycle 5 ............................................................................................. 10-5 10.2.2 Cycle 9 ............................................................................................. 10-5 10.2.3 Cycle 13 ......................................................................................... 10-10 10.2.4 Cycle 18 ......................................................................................... 10-10 11.0 SAMPLE PREPARATION, ANALYSES, AND SECURITY ................................ 11-1 12.0 DATA VERIFICATION ......................................................................................... 12-1 13.0 MINERAL PROCESSING AND METALLURGICAL TESTING ........................ 13-1 14.0 MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATES .................................................................. 14-1 14.1 Definitions and Applicable Standards ............................................................ 14-1 14.2 Base Case Mining Scenario ............................................................................ 14-2 14.3 Methodology ................................................................................................... 14-2 14.4 Exploration Target Estimates .......................................................................... 14-3 14.4.1 Potash 5 ............................................................................................ 14-3 14.4.2 Potash 18 .......................................................................................... 14-5 14.4.3 Potash 13 .......................................................................................... 14-7 14.4.4 Potash 9 ............................................................................................ 14-7 14.4.5 Potash 16 .......................................................................................... 14-7 14.4.6 Potash 6 ............................................................................................ 14-7 15.0 MINERAL RESERVE ESTIMATES ..................................................................... 15-1 16.0 MINING METHODS.............................................................................................. 16-1 17.0 RECOVERY METHODS ....................................................................................... 17-1 18.0 PROJECT INFRASTRUCTURE ............................................................................ 18-1 19.0 MARKET STUDIES AND CONTRACTS ............................................................. 19-1 Agapito Associates, Inc. NI 43-101 Technical Report, Green River Potash Project, Grand County, Utah, USA Prepared for Magna Resources Ltd. 10 July 2012 Page iv 20.0 ENVIRONMENTAL, PERMITTING AND COMMUNITY IMPACT .................. 20-1 21.0 CAPITAL AND OPERATING COSTS .................................................................. 21-1 22.0 ECONOMIC ANALYSES ....................................................................................... 22-1 23.0 ADJACENT PROPERTIES .................................................................................... 23-1 23.1 Moab Potash Mine .......................................................................................... 23-1 23.2 Reunion Potash Property ................................................................................. 23-2 24.0 OTHER RELEVANT DATA AND INFORMATION ............................................ 24-1 25.0 INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS .......................................................... 25-1 26.0 RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • "Simulations of Paradox Salt Basin."
    &>.; -A , - f %' . _ / I SIMULATIONS OF PARADOX SALT BASIN Ellen J. Quinn and Peter M. Ornstein 8402060151 620824 PDR WASTE WM-16PD 3104.1/EJQ/82/08/09/0 - 1 - Purpose This report documents the preliminary NRC in-house modeling of a bedded salt site. The exercise has several purposes: 1) to prepare for receipt of the site characterization report by analyzing one of the potential salt sites; 2) to gain experience using the salt related options of the SWIFT code; and 3) to determine the information and level of detail necessary to realistically model the site. Background The Department of Energy is currently investigating several salt deposits as potential repository horizons. The sites include both salt beds and salt domes located in Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi and Utah. Site investigations will be occuring in all locations until receipt of the Site Characterization Report. In order to narrow the scope of this preliminary modeling effort, the staff decided to focus their analysis on the Paradox Basin. The site was chosen principally because of the level of information available about the site. At the time this work began, two reports on the Paradox had just been received by NRC: Permianland: A Field Symposium Guidebook of the Four Corners Geological Society (D. L. Baars, 1979), and Geology of the 3104.1/EJQ/82/08/09/0 - 2 - Paradox Basin, Rocky Mountain Association of Geologists (DL Wiegand, 1981). This in conjunction with the data information from topographic map of Paradox area (USGS Topographic Maps) and the Geosciences Data Base Handbook (Isherwood, 1981) provided the base data necessary for the modeling exercise.
    [Show full text]
  • A Summary of the Ground-Water Resources and Geohydrology of Grand County Utah
    - r , A SUMMARY OF THE GROUND-WATER RESOURCES AND GEOHYDROLOGY OF GRAND COUNTY, UTAH by Chris Eisinger and Mike Lowe Utah Geological Survey Cover photograph is the mouth of the Dirty Devil River at Lake Powell. Photo credit: Paul Link Cover design by Sharon Hamre Circular 99 May 1999 UTAH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY ....0, 9,9 a division of ~UTAH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY o Utah Department of Natural Resources STATE OF UTAH Michaela' Leavitt, Governor DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Kathleen Clarke, Executive Director UTAH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY M. Lee Allison, Director UGS Board Member Representing C. William Berge (Chairman) ........................................................................................................... Mineral Industry D. Cary Smith .................................................................................................................................. Mineral Industry Craig Nelson .................................................................................................................................. Civil Engineering E.H. Deedee O'Brien ........................................................................................................................ Public-at-Large Robert Robison ............................................................................................................................... Mineral Industry Charles Semborski .......................................................................................................................... Mineral Industry Richard R. Kennedy ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Tectonic Evolution of Western Colorado and Eastern Utah D
    New Mexico Geological Society Downloaded from: http://nmgs.nmt.edu/publications/guidebooks/32 Tectonic evolution of western Colorado and eastern Utah D. L. Baars and G. M. Stevenson, 1981, pp. 105-112 in: Western Slope (Western Colorado), Epis, R. C.; Callender, J. F.; [eds.], New Mexico Geological Society 32nd Annual Fall Field Conference Guidebook, 337 p. This is one of many related papers that were included in the 1981 NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebook. Annual NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebooks Every fall since 1950, the New Mexico Geological Society (NMGS) has held an annual Fall Field Conference that explores some region of New Mexico (or surrounding states). Always well attended, these conferences provide a guidebook to participants. Besides detailed road logs, the guidebooks contain many well written, edited, and peer-reviewed geoscience papers. These books have set the national standard for geologic guidebooks and are an essential geologic reference for anyone working in or around New Mexico. Free Downloads NMGS has decided to make peer-reviewed papers from our Fall Field Conference guidebooks available for free download. Non-members will have access to guidebook papers two years after publication. Members have access to all papers. This is in keeping with our mission of promoting interest, research, and cooperation regarding geology in New Mexico. However, guidebook sales represent a significant proportion of our operating budget. Therefore, only research papers are available for download. Road logs, mini-papers, maps, stratigraphic charts, and other selected content are available only in the printed guidebooks. Copyright Information Publications of the New Mexico Geological Society, printed and electronic, are protected by the copyright laws of the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Paleofluid Flow in the Paradox Basin: Introduction
    ©2018 Society of Economic Geologists, Inc. Guidebook Series, Volume 59 Paleofluid Flow in the Paradox Basin: Introduction Mark D. Barton,1,† Isabel F. Barton,2 and Jon P. Thorson3 1Lowell Institute for Mineral Resources and Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721 2Department of Mining and Geological Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721 3Consulting Geologist, 3611 South Xenia Street, Denver, Colorado 80237 Abstract This field trip focuses on several of the classic Cu and U(-V) ore systems of the Colorado Plateau in the context of diverse geologic environments, processes, and consequences of fluid flow of the Paradox Basin. The Paradox Basin contains a >300-m.y. history of fluid flow and resource generation. Late Paleozoic development of a K-rich evaporitic foreland basin created a setting upon which later fluid-dominated processes generated economically significant accumulations of hydrocarbons, K-rich brines, CO2, and— most notably—metals including, significant deposits of Cu and some of the largest U and V resources of the United States. The sourcing and movement of fluids of diverse types and the resulting multiplicity of metasomatic features reflect a complex history starting with salt movement beginning in the Permian, sedimentation continuing intermittently into the Paleogene, distal manifestations of Cretaceous to Paleocene orogenesis, Cenozoic magmatism and, most recently, Neogene exhumation. In light of this broader context, we will examine Cu(-Ag) systems associated with salt anticlines at Paradox Valley (Cashin mine) and Lisbon Valley (Lisbon Valley mine), superimposed modern and ancient systems at Sinbad Valley, and contrasting U-V systems in the Jurassic Morrison Formation at Monogram Mesa (Uravan district) and Triassic Chinle Formation at Lisbon Valley (Big Indian district).
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report on a Study of Fluid Inclusions in Core from Gibson Dome No
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Final report on a study of fluid inclusions in core from Gibson Dome No. 1 bore, Paradox Basin, Utah by Edwin Roedderl U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 84-696 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards (and stratigraphic nomenclature) 959, Reston, VA 22092 1984 Introduction Five small core samples of halite from the Department of Energy Gibson Dome No. 1 Bore (GD-1) were obtained for a preliminary study of the fluid inclusions present. These samples were from evaporite cycle 6 of the Paradox Member of the Hermosa Formation. The aim of this investi­ gation was to see what information such a study might provide as to the geologic behavior of such fluids if these salt beds were used for a nuclear waste repository, as well as the geologic processes involved in the formation and subsequent history of these saline beds. Samples studied The studied samples consisted of one-fourth of the 4-inch diameter core from the following depth intervals, measured in feet from the Kelley bushing: 3,148.9 - 3,149.1 3,185.0 - 3,185.2 3,239.1 - 3,293.3 3,279.6 - 3,279.8 3,321.5 - 3,321.7 These samples were selected in consultation with R.J. Hite, USGS, and were released to the USGS per letter dated August 3, 1982, PXX-82-281 , from N.A. Frazier, Project Manager, Paradox Basin Exploration Office, to Mr. Fred Conwell, Woodward-Clyde Consultants.
    [Show full text]
  • Outcrop to Subsurface Stratigraphy of the Pennsylvanian Hermosa Group Southern Paradox Basin U.S.A
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2002 Outcrop to subsurface stratigraphy of the Pennsylvanian Hermosa Group southern Paradox Basin U.S.A. Alan Lee Brown Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the Earth Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Brown, Alan Lee, "Outcrop to subsurface stratigraphy of the Pennsylvanian Hermosa Group southern Paradox Basin U.S.A." (2002). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 2678. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/2678 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. OUTCROP TO SUBSURFACE STRATIGRAPHY OF THE PENNSYLVANIAN HERMOSA GROUP SOUTHERN PARADOX BASIN U. S. A. A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of Geology and Geophysics by Alan Lee Brown B.S., Madison College, 1977 M.S., West Virginia University 1982 December 2002 DEDICATIONS This dissertation is dedicated to the memory of Marcy and Peter Fabian both were teacher and mentor to me at a critical time in my life. I first met Marcy and Peter at Kisikiminetas Springs Prep School as a high school post-graduate waiting admission to the United States Naval Academy. Peter was an English teacher, tennis coach, and the main athletic trainer.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Ute Reservation Upper Menefee UT CO AZ NM Lower Menefee
    Southern Ute Indian Reservation occurs throughout the coal seams underlying the Reservation. The coal, estimated to be in excess of 200 million tons of strippable coal, General Setting is high quality (10,000 BTUs per lb.) and with low sulfur content. U T A H C O L O R A D O The Southern Ute Indian Reservation is in southwestern Colorado Leasing of minerals and development agreements on the UTE MOUNTAIN UTE adjacent to the New Mexico border (Figs. SU-1 and -2). The reser- Southern Ute Indian Reservation are designed in accordance with the vation encompasses an area about 15 miles (24 km) wide by 72 miles Indian Mineral Development Act of 1982, and the rules and (116 km) long; total area is approximately 818,000 acres (331,000 regulations contained in 25 CFR, Part 225 (published in the Federal SOUTHERN UTE ha). Of the Indian land, 301,867 acres (122,256 ha) are tribally Register, March 30, 1994). The Tribe no longer performs lease owned and 4,966 acres (2,011 ha) are allotted lands; 277 acres (112 agreements under the old 1938 Act (since 1977). NAVAJO ha) are federally owned (U.S. Department of Commerce, 1974). The The 1982 Act provides increased flexibility to the Tribe and TAOS JICARILLA rest is either privately owned or National Forest Service Lands. The developer to tailor their agreements to the specific needs of each APACHE TAO Tribal land is fairly concentrated in two blocks; one in T 32-33 N, R party. It also allows the parties to draft agreements based on state-of- PICURIS 1-6 W, and the other in T 32 N, R 8-13 W and T 33 N, R 11 W.
    [Show full text]
  • Reasonably Foreseeable Development (RFD) Scenario for Potash in the Moab Master Leasing Plan Area (MMLPA), BLM Canyon Country District
    RFD Scenario for Potash in the MMLPA, BLM Canyon Country District TABLE OF CONTENTS I. SUMMARY............................................................................................................................................... - 1 - II. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................... - 3 - III. DESCRIPTION OF THE GEOLOGY PERTAINING TO POTASH RESOURCES ....................... - 4 - IV. PAST AND PRESENT POTASH EXPLORATION ACTIVITIY ...................................................... - 5 - V. PAST AND PRESENT POTASH DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY ...................................................... - 7 - Conflicts with other Mineral Development ............................................................................................. - 8 - Known Potash Leasing Areas (KPLAs) and Leasing Activity ................................................................ - 9 - VI. POTASH OCCURRENCE POTENTIAL.............................................................................................. - 9 - VII. POTASH DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL ......................................................................................... - 11 - VIII. RFD BASELINE SCENARIO ASSUMPTIONS ................................................................................. - 12 - Potash Market ...................................................................................................................................... - 12 - Projections for Exploration Drilling
    [Show full text]
  • GEOLOGY of the COLORADO PLATEAU Annabelle Foos Geology Department, University of Akron
    GEOLOGY OF THE COLORADO PLATEAU Annabelle Foos Geology Department, University of Akron Introduction and Range. The margins of the Colorado The Colorado Plateau is a land of scenic Plateau are marked by major volcanic beauty characterized by sparsely vegetated accumulations (figure 2). plateaus, mesas, deep canyons, and barren Geophysical studies indicate the earth's badlands. It encompasses an area of crust is relatively thick below the province and approximately 140,000 square miles in the four heat flow (geothermal gradient) is relatively corners region of Utah, Colorado, Arizona and low. The plateau also has distinct gravity and New Mexico. It includes the area drained by magnetic signatures. the Colorado River and it's tributaries the The Colorado Plateau has been divided Green, San Juan and Little Colorado Rivers into the following six sections (Rigby, 1977): (figure 1). 1) Grand Canyon section, structurally this is the The combination of high relief and an arid highest part of the Colorado Plateau province. climate over most of the plateau has resulted in 2) High Plateaus section, this section is limited plant cover. The products of weathering characterized by high, north-trending plateaus, are easily eroded by fast moving streams separated from each other by faults. 3) Uinta leaving behind bare rocks which produce the Basin, this is structurally the lowest part of the dramatic scenery of this area. Not to mention, Colorado Plateau. 4) Canyonlands section, the excellent rock exposures waiting to be deeply incised canyons are distinctive features explored by a group of geology students. of this section which contains large monoclines Elevations on the plateau range from and laccolithic mountains.
    [Show full text]
  • Pre-Carboniferous Paleotectonics of the San Juan Basin, New Mexico G
    New Mexico Geological Society Downloaded from: http://nmgs.nmt.edu/publications/guidebooks/28 Pre-carboniferous paleotectonics of the San Juan Basin, New Mexico G. M. Stevenson and D. L. Baars, 1977, pp. 99-110 in: San Juan Basin III (northwestern New Mexico), Fassett, J. F.; James, H. L.; [eds.], New Mexico Geological Society 28th Annual Fall Field Conference Guidebook, 319 p. This is one of many related papers that were included in the 1977 NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebook. Annual NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebooks Every fall since 1950, the New Mexico Geological Society (NMGS) has held an annual Fall Field Conference that explores some region of New Mexico (or surrounding states). Always well attended, these conferences provide a guidebook to participants. Besides detailed road logs, the guidebooks contain many well written, edited, and peer-reviewed geoscience papers. These books have set the national standard for geologic guidebooks and are an essential geologic reference for anyone working in or around New Mexico. Free Downloads NMGS has decided to make peer-reviewed papers from our Fall Field Conference guidebooks available for free download. Non-members will have access to guidebook papers two years after publication. Members have access to all papers. This is in keeping with our mission of promoting interest, research, and cooperation regarding geology in New Mexico. However, guidebook sales represent a significant proportion of our operating budget. Therefore, only research papers are available for download. Road logs, mini-papers, maps, stratigraphic charts, and other selected content are available only in the printed guidebooks. Copyright Information Publications of the New Mexico Geological Society, printed and electronic, are protected by the copyright laws of the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Undiscovered Oil and Gas Resources in the Paradox Basin Province, Utah, Colorado, New Mexico, and Arizona, 2011
    National Assessment of Oil and Gas Assessment of Undiscovered Oil and Gas Resources in the Paradox Basin Province, Utah, Colorado, New Mexico, and Arizona, 2011 Using a geology-based assessment methodology, the U.S. Geological Survey estimated means of 560 million barrels of undiscovered oil, 12,701 billion cubic feet of undiscovered natural gas, and 490 million barrels of undiscovered natural gas liquids in the Paradox Basin of Utah, Colorado, New Mexico, and Arizona. Introduction continuous AUs, and one coalbed gas AU were quantitatively assessed. The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) recently completed a geology-based assessment of the undiscovered, technically Geologic Summary recoverable oil and gas resources in the Paradox Basin, which extends into parts of Utah, Colorado, Arizona, and New Mexico The Paradox Basin formed in the Pennsylvanian as a (fig. 1). Figure 1 shows the Paradox Basin Province boundary, response to large intraplate stresses that have been attributed to as defined by Gautier and others (1996), as part of the 1995 the collision of Gondwana and Laurentia (Barbeau, 2003; Kluth USGS National Assessment. The assessment was based on the and DuChene, 2009). The basin is asymmetric, with the deep- geologic elements that define a total petroleum system (TPS), est part along the north margin, adjacent to the Uncompahgre which include petroleum source rocks (source rock maturation, uplift in Utah and Colorado (fig. 2). Interbedded salt and black petroleum generation and migration), reservoir description shales were deposited close to the north basin margin, along (reservoir presence and quality), and petroleum traps (trap with clastics shed off the Uncompahgre uplift.
    [Show full text]
  • The Middle Jurassic Entrada Sandstone in Northeastern Arizona and Adjacent Areas Robert B
    New Mexico Geological Society Downloaded from: http://nmgs.nmt.edu/publications/guidebooks/54 The Middle Jurassic Entrada Sandstone in northeastern Arizona and adjacent areas Robert B. O'Sullivan, 2003, pp. 303-308 in: Geology of the Zuni Plateau, Lucas, Spencer G.; Semken, Steven C.; Berglof, William; Ulmer-Scholle, Dana; [eds.], New Mexico Geological Society 54th Annual Fall Field Conference Guidebook, 425 p. This is one of many related papers that were included in the 2003 NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebook. Annual NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebooks Every fall since 1950, the New Mexico Geological Society (NMGS) has held an annual Fall Field Conference that explores some region of New Mexico (or surrounding states). Always well attended, these conferences provide a guidebook to participants. Besides detailed road logs, the guidebooks contain many well written, edited, and peer-reviewed geoscience papers. These books have set the national standard for geologic guidebooks and are an essential geologic reference for anyone working in or around New Mexico. Free Downloads NMGS has decided to make peer-reviewed papers from our Fall Field Conference guidebooks available for free download. Non-members will have access to guidebook papers two years after publication. Members have access to all papers. This is in keeping with our mission of promoting interest, research, and cooperation regarding geology in New Mexico. However, guidebook sales represent a significant proportion of our operating budget. Therefore, only research papers are available for download. Road logs, mini-papers, maps, stratigraphic charts, and other selected content are available only in the printed guidebooks. Copyright Information Publications of the New Mexico Geological Society, printed and electronic, are protected by the copyright laws of the United States.
    [Show full text]