DOCSLIB.ORG

Shallow-Shelf Carbonate Buildups in the Paradox Basin, Utah— Targets for Increased Oil and Gas Production and Reserves Using Horizontal Drilling Techniques

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Shallow-Shelf Carbonate Buildups in the Paradox Basin, Utah— Targets for Increased Oil and Gas Production and Reserves Using Horizontal Drilling Techniques SHALLOW-SHELF CARBONATE BUILDUPS IN THE PARADOX BASIN, UTAH— TARGETS FOR INCREASED OIL AND GAS PRODUCTION AND RESERVES USING HORIZONTAL DRILLING TECHNIQUES Thomas C. Chidsey, Jr., Compiler and Editor BULLETIN 140 UTAH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY UTAH DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 2020 Blank pages are intentional for printing purposes. SHALLOW-SHELF CARBONATE BUILDUPS IN THE PARADOX BASIN, UTAH— TARGETS FOR INCREASED OIL AND GAS PRODUCTION AND RESERVES USING HORIZONTAL DRILLING TECHNIQUES Thomas C. Chidsey, Jr., Compiler and Editor Cover photos: Reservoir zones in the Pennsylvanian Paradox Formation, Paradox Basin, southeastern Utah. Top photos—Desert Creek zone, Bug field, San Juan County: (left) slabbed core of a dolomitized phylloid-algal bafflestone with visible porosity, and (right) photomicrograph under plane light of extensive micro-boxwork porosity with some hollow dolomites and pores lined or plugged with bitumen. Bottom photos—Ismay zone, Cherokee field, San Juan County: (left) photomicrograph under plane light of a peloidal packstone/grainstone dominated by microporosity, and (right) scanning electron microscope photomicrograph showing well-developed dolomite rhombs exhibiting abundant intercrystalline microporosity. Suggested citation: Chidsey, T.C., Jr., compiler and editor, 2020, Shallow-shelf carbonate buildups in the Paradox Basin, Utah—targets for increased oil and gas production and reserves using horizontal drilling techniques: Utah Geological Survey Bulletin 140, 173 p., 11 appendices, https://doi.org/10.34191/B-140. BULLETIN 140 UTAH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY UTAH DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 2020 STATE OF UTAH Gary R. Herbert, Governor DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Brian C. Steed, Executive Director UTAH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY R. William Keach II, Director PUBLICATIONS contact Natural Resources Map & Bookstore 1594 W. North Temple Salt Lake City, UT 84116 telephone: 801-537-3320 toll-free: 1-888-UTAH MAP website: utahmapstore.com email: [email protected] UTAH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY contact 1594 W. North Temple, Suite 3110 Salt Lake City, UT 84116 telephone: 801-537-3300 website: geology.utah.gov Although this product represents the work of professional scientists, the Utah Department of Natural Resources, Utah Geological Survey, makes no warranty, expressed or implied, regarding its suitability for a particular use. The Utah Department of Natural Resources, Utah Geological Survey, shall not be liable under any circumstances for any direct, indirect, special, incidental, or consequential damages with respect to claims by users of this product. The Utah Geological Survey does not endorse any products or manufacturers. Reference to any specific commercial product, process, service, or company by trade name, trademark, or otherwise, does not constitute endorsement or recommendation by the Utah Geological Survey. CONTENTS PREFACE ..................................................................................................................................................................................xiii ABSTRACT ...............................................................................................................................................................................xiv CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................................. 1 OVERVIEW .................................................................................................................................................................................. 3 BENEFITS AND POTENTIAL APPLICATION ......................................................................................................................... 3 PARADOX BASIN OVERVIEW ................................................................................................................................................. 4 Tectonic Setting ..................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Paradox Formation ................................................................................................................................................................. 8 Hydrocarbon Traps ................................................................................................................................................................ 9 CHAPTER 2: REGIONAL UTAH LITHOFACIES EVALUATION OF THE DESERT CREEK AND ISMAY ZONES, BLANDING SUB-BASIN ................................................................................................................................ 11 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................................................... 13 METHODS AND LOG-BASED CORRELATION SCHEME .................................................................................................. 13 REGIONAL LITHOFACIES TRENDS IN THE UPPER ISMAY AND LOWER DESERT CREEK ZONES OF THE UTAH PART OF THE BLANDING SUB-BASIN ............................................................................................................. 14 Lithology .............................................................................................................................................................................. 14 Lithofacies 1 – Open Marine .......................................................................................................................................... 14 Lithofacies 2 – Middle Shelf .......................................................................................................................................... 18 Lithofacies 3 – Inner Shelf/Tidal Flat ............................................................................................................................ 18 Lithofacies 4 – Bryozoan Mound ................................................................................................................................... 18 Lithofacies 5 – Proto-Mound ......................................................................................................................................... 20 Lithofacies 6 – Phylloid-Algal Mound ........................................................................................................................... 20 Lithofacies 7 – Quartz Sand Dune ................................................................................................................................. 20 Lithofacies 8 – Anhydrite Salina .................................................................................................................................... 21 Depositional Environments ................................................................................................................................................. 21 Regional Lithofacies Maps .................................................................................................................................................. 26 Ismay Isochore Relationships .............................................................................................................................................. 28 CHAPTER 3: GENERAL PETROLEUM GEOLOGY, BUG AND CHEROKEE CASE-STUDY FIELDS, SAN JUAN COUNTY, UTAH .................................................................................................................................................... 35 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................................................... 37 FIELD DATA COLLECTION, COMPILATION, AND INTERPRETATION .......................................................................... 37 FIELD OVERVIEWS ................................................................................................................................................................. 37 Bug Field ............................................................................................................................................................................. 37 Cherokee Field ..................................................................................................................................................................... 40 RESERVOIR MAPPING ............................................................................................................................................................ 40 Bug Field ............................................................................................................................................................................. 61 Cherokee Field ..................................................................................................................................................................... 61 RESERVOIR DIAGENETIC ANALYSIS ................................................................................................................................. 61 Bug Field ............................................................................................................................................................................. 61 Cherokee Field ..................................................................................................................................................................... 64 POROSITY AND PERMEABILITY CROSSPLOTS ...............................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Construction Versus Accumulation in Phylloid Algal Mounds: an Example of a Small Constructed Mound in the Pennsylvanian of Kansas, USA
    Published in Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 185: 379-389, 2002 Construction versus accumulation in phylloid algal mounds: an example of a small constructed mound in the Pennsylvanian of Kansas, USA Elias Samankassou a;Ã, Ronald R. West b a Universite¤ de Fribourg, De¤partement de Ge¤osciences, Ge¤ologie et Pale¤ontologie, Pe¤rolles, CH-1700 Fribourg, Switzerland b Kansas State University, Department of Geology, Thompson Hall, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA Received 9 April 2001; accepted 17 May 2002 Abstract Most phylloid algal mounds are currently interpreted as no more than accumulations of leaf-like thalli supported by mud. We report here phylloid algae from the Upper Pennsylvanian (Late Carboniferous) Frisbie Limestone Member in Kansas, USA, which built small mounds with recognizable primary topographic relief. Cup-shaped algal thalli, growing closely packed and juxtaposed near and above one another, produced a framework in the shapes of topographically conspicuous mounds from smaller, centimeter-scale to meter-scale features. Meter-scale mounds are composites of smaller, juxtaposed, centimeter-scale mounds and intramound areas contain crinoid debris, sponges, bryozoans, brachiopods, and skeletal grains. The intercup voids enclosed in the framework fabrics of individual thalli are filled with a variety of matrix and cements: (1) peloidal grains, both in clotted wackestone and grainstone; (2) early marine cement; (3) microbial encrustations, often oriented against gravity; and (4) mudstone. Bedded limestones equivalent to and overlying the mounds are bioclastic wackestone and differ fundamentally from the mound limestone in facies, biotic components, absence of both frameworks and of peloidal clotted grains. Topographic relief above the sea floor, the growth fabrics with a framework including primary intramound and intercup voids and their complex infillings, and the lithic and biotic differences between mound and off-mound intervals fulfil the stratigraphic and biological criteria characterizing reefs.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rugose Coral Faunas of the Carboniferous/Permian Boundary Interval
    Acta Palaeontologica Polonica Vol. 31, No. 34 pp. 253-275 Warszawa, 1986 JERZY FEDOROWSKI THE RUGOSE CORAL FAUNAS OF THE CARBONIFEROUS/PERMIAN BOUNDARY INTERVAL FEDOROWSKI, J.: The rugose coral faunas of the CarboniferouslPermian boun- dary interval. Acta Palaeont. Polonica, 31, 3-4, 253-275, 1986 (issued 1987). Analysis of the rugose coral fauna of the Carhoniferous/Permian transition strata is discussed, with special emphasis on corals from the Pseudoschwagerina Zone. Two distinct realms: the Tethys Realm and the Cordillera-Arctic-Uralian Realm were developed in the Carboniferous-Permian time. Recently introduced taxonomic, biostratigraphic and paleogeographic data and interpretations are evaluated in terms of their global and regional value. It is postulated that corals ,have some importance as a supplementary group for establishing the lower limit of the Permian System. K e y w o r d s: Rugosa, CarboniferousIPermo boundary, lialeogeography. Jerzy Fedorowski: Katedra Geologti, Uniwersytet im. A. Mickiewicza, ul. Miellyri- skiego 27/29, 61-715 Poznari, Poland. Received: January, 1986. INTRODUCTION The following introductory synthesis of the Carboniferous/Permo boundary phase of the rugose coral evolution is based on data from earlier, well-documented papers and from new, detailed studies of Upper Carboni- ferous andlor Permian coral faunas. It also incorporates general con- siderations on the coral faunas themselves, and on the tectogenesis of various regions, mainly the mountains of the North American Cordillera. Unfortunately, the number of areas with the CarboniferousIPermian passage beds developed in the coralliferous facies is limited. Also, the research data concerning the rugose coral faunas of several of those areas are inadequate. Thus, the remarks that follow are based only on the few regions with well-exposed successions and fairly well-known coral faunas, and some of the less well known regions have been omitted.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of a Sponge Bioherm from the Hermosa Group, Molas Lake Area, Colorado
    Bowling Green State University ScholarWorks@BGSU Honors Projects Honors College Spring 2014 Analysis of a Sponge Bioherm from the Hermosa Group, Molas Lake Area, Colorado Joanna Hamilton [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.bgsu.edu/honorsprojects Part of the Paleobiology Commons Repository Citation Hamilton, Joanna, "Analysis of a Sponge Bioherm from the Hermosa Group, Molas Lake Area, Colorado" (2014). Honors Projects. 116. https://scholarworks.bgsu.edu/honorsprojects/116 This work is brought to you for free and open access by the Honors College at ScholarWorks@BGSU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Projects by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@BGSU. Analysis of a Sponge Bioherm from the Hermosa Group, Molas Lake Area, Colorado Joanna Hamilton Bowling Green State University Department of Geology April 2013 Introduction: The Hermosa Group The Hermosa Group is a Pennsylvanian (~310 Ma) rock unit found in the southwestern San Juan Mountains and the Paradox Basin. The Paradox Basin is a northwest-southeast trending basin related to the Uncompahgre Uplift in the north, salt deposition and movement throughout, and a Precambrian fault system in the underlying basement rocks (Brown 2002, Trudgill and Arbuckle 2009). The Uncompahgre Uplift occurred in response to the Ouachita – Marathon Orogeny (related to the Ancestral Rocky Mountains Orogeny) caused by the collision of North America and South America-Africa during the Late Mississippian (~ 320 Ma) (Trudgill and Arbuckle 2009, Pazzaglia et al. 1999). The Paradox Basin formed as a complimentary subsidence basin alongside the uplifted area (Brown 2002). When the basin subsided, smaller structural features formed within it, including step-down grabens close to the uplift and folded areas further away (Baars and Stevenson 1981, Brown 2002).
    [Show full text]
  • Oil and Gas Plays Ute Moutnain Ute Reservation, Colorado and New Mexico
    Ute Mountain Ute Indian Reservation Cortez R18W Karle Key Xu R17W T General Setting Mine Xu Xcu 36 Can y on N Xcu McElmo WIND RIVER 32 INDIAN MABEL The Ute Mountain Ute Reservation is located in the northwest RESERVATION MOUNTAIN FT HALL IND RES Little Moude Mine Xcu T N ern portion of New Mexico and the southwestern corner of Colorado UTE PEAK 35 N R16W (Fig. UM-1). The reservation consists of 553,008 acres in Montezu BLACK 666 T W Y O M I N G MOUNTAIN 35 R20W SLEEPING UTE MOUNTAIN N ma and La Plata Counties, Colorado, and San Juan County, New R19W Coche T Mexico. All of these lands belong to the tribe but are held in trust by NORTHWESTERN 34 SHOSHONI HERMANO the U.S. Government. Individually owned lands, or allotments, are IND RES Desert Canyon PEAK N MESA VERDE R14W NATIONAL GREAT SALT LAKE W Marble SENTINEL located at Allen Canyon and White Mesa, San Juan County, Utah, Wash Towaoc PARK PEAK T and cover 8,499 acres. Tribal lands held in trust within this area cov Towaoc River M E S A 33 1/2 N er 3,597 acres. An additional forty acres are defined as U.S. Govern THE MOUND R15W SKULL VALLEY ment lands in San Juan County, Utah, and are utilized for school pur TEXAS PACIFIC 6-INCH OIL PIPELINE IND RES UNITAH AND OURAY INDIAN RESERVATION Navajo poses. W Ramona GOSHUTE 789 The Allen Canyon allotments are located twelve miles west of IND RES T UTAH 33 Blanding, Utah, and adjacent to the Manti-La Sal National Forest.
    [Show full text]
  • Front Cover.Pub
    PENNSYLVANIAN-PERMIAN VEGETATIONAL CHANGES IN TROPICAL EURAMERICA William A. DiMichele, C. Blaine Cecil, Dan S. Chaney, Scott D. Elrick, Spencer G. Lucas, Richard Lupia, W. John Nelson, and Neil J. Tabor INTRODUCTION Vegetational changes across the Pennsylvanian-Permian boundary are recorded in several largely terrestrial basins across the Euramerican portions of equatorial Pangea. For the purposes of this paper, these include the Bursum-Abo Formation transition and its equivalents in several small basins in New Mexico, the Halgaito Formation of southeastern Utah, Markley Formation of the eastern shelf of the Midland Basin in north-central Texas, Council Grove Group of northern Oklahoma and southern Kansas, and Dunkard Group of the central Appalachian Basin. This transition also is recorded in numerous basins in Europe, reviewed by Roscher and Schneider (2006), based on paleoclimate indicators preserved in those regions. Collectively, these deposits form a west-to-east transect across the Pangean paleotropics and thus provide a paleogeographic setting for examination of both temporal and spatial changes in vegetation across the Pennsylvanian-Permian boundary (Figures 1 and 2). The Pennsylvanian-Permian transition records the change from wetland vegetation as the predominant assemblages found in the plant fossil record, to seasonally dry vegetation. This has often been called the “Paleophytic-Mesophytic” transition, a concept that is flawed Figure 1. Continental configuration at the Pennsylvanian-Permian boundary. Yellow ovals indicate the principal areas discussed herein: Left – New Mexico and Utah, Center – Texas and Oklahoma, Right – Central Appalachians/Dunkard. Map courtesy of Ron Blakey, Northern Arizona University. DiMichele, W. A., Cecil, C. B., Chaney, D. S., Elrich, S.
    [Show full text]
  • "Simulations of Paradox Salt Basin."
    &>.; -A , - f %' . _ / I SIMULATIONS OF PARADOX SALT BASIN Ellen J. Quinn and Peter M. Ornstein 8402060151 620824 PDR WASTE WM-16PD 3104.1/EJQ/82/08/09/0 - 1 - Purpose This report documents the preliminary NRC in-house modeling of a bedded salt site. The exercise has several purposes: 1) to prepare for receipt of the site characterization report by analyzing one of the potential salt sites; 2) to gain experience using the salt related options of the SWIFT code; and 3) to determine the information and level of detail necessary to realistically model the site. Background The Department of Energy is currently investigating several salt deposits as potential repository horizons. The sites include both salt beds and salt domes located in Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi and Utah. Site investigations will be occuring in all locations until receipt of the Site Characterization Report. In order to narrow the scope of this preliminary modeling effort, the staff decided to focus their analysis on the Paradox Basin. The site was chosen principally because of the level of information available about the site. At the time this work began, two reports on the Paradox had just been received by NRC: Permianland: A Field Symposium Guidebook of the Four Corners Geological Society (D. L. Baars, 1979), and Geology of the 3104.1/EJQ/82/08/09/0 - 2 - Paradox Basin, Rocky Mountain Association of Geologists (DL Wiegand, 1981). This in conjunction with the data information from topographic map of Paradox area (USGS Topographic Maps) and the Geosciences Data Base Handbook (Isherwood, 1981) provided the base data necessary for the modeling exercise.
    [Show full text]
  • It Was Recognized During Geological Excursions in the Bükk Mountains
    NEWER LIME-SECRETING ALGAE FROM THE MIDDLE CARBONIFEROUS OF THE BÜKK MOUNTAINS, NORTHERN HUNGARY M. NEMETH INTRODUCTION It was recognized during geological excursions in the Bükk Mountains that certain limestone lenses of the Upper Moscovian shale sequence yield other calcareous algae than those dasycladaceans (Vermiporella sp., Anthracoporella sp., A. spectabilis PIA and Dvinella comata CHVOROVA) described previously by HERAK, M. and Ko- CHANSKY, V. [1963]. From limestone samples came from the No. 1 railway cutting of Nagyvisnyó, from the eastern side of the Bánvölgy (NW to the Dédes Castle), from the southern vicinity of the village Mályinka, from Kapubérc, from western side of the summit of Tarófő and from deeper part of the main lens of Nagyberenás the forms of the genera Archaeolithophyllum, Ivanovia, Oligoporellal and Osagia have been recognized. The first two genera belong into the phylloid algae of PRAY, L, C. and WRAY, J. L. [1963]. The genus Macroporella is classed among the family Dasydadaceae, while the Osagia is a crustose calcareous alga of uncertain systemat- ic position. Most interesting are the phylloid algae, which are similar in shape and size to leaves and are slightly or strongerly wavy, in spite of the morphological similarity that suggested by their common name, these are forms of different groups (e.g. green or red algae). This group was named by American authors, because these phylloid algae are abundant, occasionally in rock-forming quantity in the Middle and Upper Carboniferous (Pennsylvanián) and Lower Permian of the USA. On the other hand, the preservation of the cavities between the wavy plates of these algae pro- motes significantly the formation of hydrocarbon traps within the embedding rocks.
    [Show full text]
  • An Inventory of Trilobites from National Park Service Areas
    Sullivan, R.M. and Lucas, S.G., eds., 2016, Fossil Record 5. New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science Bulletin 74. 179 AN INVENTORY OF TRILOBITES FROM NATIONAL PARK SERVICE AREAS MEGAN R. NORR¹, VINCENT L. SANTUCCI1 and JUSTIN S. TWEET2 1National Park Service. 1201 Eye Street NW, Washington, D.C. 20005; -email: [email protected]; 2Tweet Paleo-Consulting. 9149 79th St. S. Cottage Grove. MN 55016; Abstract—Trilobites represent an extinct group of Paleozoic marine invertebrate fossils that have great scientific interest and public appeal. Trilobites exhibit wide taxonomic diversity and are contained within nine orders of the Class Trilobita. A wealth of scientific literature exists regarding trilobites, their morphology, biostratigraphy, indicators of paleoenvironments, behavior, and other research themes. An inventory of National Park Service areas reveals that fossilized remains of trilobites are documented from within at least 33 NPS units, including Death Valley National Park, Grand Canyon National Park, Yellowstone National Park, and Yukon-Charley Rivers National Preserve. More than 120 trilobite hototype specimens are known from National Park Service areas. INTRODUCTION Of the 262 National Park Service areas identified with paleontological resources, 33 of those units have documented trilobite fossils (Fig. 1). More than 120 holotype specimens of trilobites have been found within National Park Service (NPS) units. Once thriving during the Paleozoic Era (between ~520 and 250 million years ago) and becoming extinct at the end of the Permian Period, trilobites were prone to fossilization due to their hard exoskeletons and the sedimentary marine environments they inhabited. While parks such as Death Valley National Park and Yukon-Charley Rivers National Preserve have reported a great abundance of fossilized trilobites, many other national parks also contain a diverse trilobite fauna.
    [Show full text]
  • A Summary of the Ground-Water Resources and Geohydrology of Grand County Utah
    - r , A SUMMARY OF THE GROUND-WATER RESOURCES AND GEOHYDROLOGY OF GRAND COUNTY, UTAH by Chris Eisinger and Mike Lowe Utah Geological Survey Cover photograph is the mouth of the Dirty Devil River at Lake Powell. Photo credit: Paul Link Cover design by Sharon Hamre Circular 99 May 1999 UTAH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY ....0, 9,9 a division of ~UTAH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY o Utah Department of Natural Resources STATE OF UTAH Michaela' Leavitt, Governor DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Kathleen Clarke, Executive Director UTAH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY M. Lee Allison, Director UGS Board Member Representing C. William Berge (Chairman) ........................................................................................................... Mineral Industry D. Cary Smith .................................................................................................................................. Mineral Industry Craig Nelson .................................................................................................................................. Civil Engineering E.H. Deedee O'Brien ........................................................................................................................ Public-at-Large Robert Robison ............................................................................................................................... Mineral Industry Charles Semborski .......................................................................................................................... Mineral Industry Richard R. Kennedy ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Tectonic Evolution of Western Colorado and Eastern Utah D
    New Mexico Geological Society Downloaded from: http://nmgs.nmt.edu/publications/guidebooks/32 Tectonic evolution of western Colorado and eastern Utah D. L. Baars and G. M. Stevenson, 1981, pp. 105-112 in: Western Slope (Western Colorado), Epis, R. C.; Callender, J. F.; [eds.], New Mexico Geological Society 32nd Annual Fall Field Conference Guidebook, 337 p. This is one of many related papers that were included in the 1981 NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebook. Annual NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebooks Every fall since 1950, the New Mexico Geological Society (NMGS) has held an annual Fall Field Conference that explores some region of New Mexico (or surrounding states). Always well attended, these conferences provide a guidebook to participants. Besides detailed road logs, the guidebooks contain many well written, edited, and peer-reviewed geoscience papers. These books have set the national standard for geologic guidebooks and are an essential geologic reference for anyone working in or around New Mexico. Free Downloads NMGS has decided to make peer-reviewed papers from our Fall Field Conference guidebooks available for free download. Non-members will have access to guidebook papers two years after publication. Members have access to all papers. This is in keeping with our mission of promoting interest, research, and cooperation regarding geology in New Mexico. However, guidebook sales represent a significant proportion of our operating budget. Therefore, only research papers are available for download. Road logs, mini-papers, maps, stratigraphic charts, and other selected content are available only in the printed guidebooks. Copyright Information Publications of the New Mexico Geological Society, printed and electronic, are protected by the copyright laws of the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of the Tarim Basin with Special Emphasis on Petroleum Deposits, Xinjiang Uygur Zizhiqu, Northwest China
    Geology of the Tarim Basin with special emphasis on petroleum deposits, Xinjiang Uygur Zizhiqu, Northwest China By K. Y. Lee U.S. Geological Survey Reston, Virginia Open-File Report 85-616 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards and stratigraphic nomenclature. 1985 CONTENTS Page Abstract 1 Introduction 2 Regional setting 6 Purpose, scope, and method of report 6 S t rat igraphy 6 Jr r e""D inian Q Sinian 8 Paleozoic 10 Lower Paleozoic 11 Upper Paleozoic 12 Mesozoic 15 Tr ias s i c 15 Jurassi c 16 Cretaceous 17 Cenozoic 18 Tertiary 18 Quat e rnar y 2 0 Structure 21 Kuqa Foredeep 21 Northern Tarim Uplift 21 Eastern Tarim Depression 24 Central Uplift 24 Southwestern Depression 26 Kalpin Uplift 26 Southeastern Faulted Blocks 27 Evolution of the basin 27 Petroleum and coal deposits 36 Petroleum 36 Source rocks 36 Reservoir rocks 44 Cap rocks 45 Types of trap 47 Potential and description of known oil and gas fields 47 Occurrence 50 Potential 50 Summary and conclusions 52 References cited 54 ILLUSTRATIONS Page Figure 1. Index map of China 3 2. Geologic map of the Tarim (Talimu) basin, Xinjiang, northwest China 4 3. Airborne magnetic anomaly contours in Ta 9 4. Principal structural units 22 5. Sketch isopachs of the earth's crust 23 6. Depth to the magnetic basement rocks 25 7. Isopachs of the Paleozoic and Sinian strata 29 8. Isopachs of the Cenozoic and Mesozoic strata 30 9. Isopachs of the Jurassic strata 32 10.
    [Show full text]
  • GEOLOGY of the MOAB REGION Introduction
    GEOLOGY OF THE MOAB REGION (Arches, Dead Horse Point and Canyonlands) Annabelle Foos Geology Department, University of Akron Introduction The geology of Arches National Park, porphyry laccolith that was intruded during the Dead Horse Point State Park and the “Island in Oligocene, 30 million years ago and the Sky” section of Canyonlands National Park experienced glaciation during the Pleistocene. is very similar. They occur in the Canyonlands Melting snow which accumulates in the section of the Colorado Plateau, in the vicinity mountains during winter months, replenishes of the confluence between the Green and streams and recharges bedrock aquifers Colorado Rivers. The same stratigraphic units providing a valuable source of fresh water to outcrop in all three parks (figure 1) plus salt this region. (Doelling and others, 1987) tectonic features can be found in both Arches and Canyonlands. While in the Moab region you will become familiar with some of the stratigraphic units we will see throughout the Colorado Plateau, observe salt tectonic features, arch formation and in the distance you can view the La Sal Mountains. Cryptogamic Soils While in these three parks (and throughout this trip) you will be required to STAY ON THE DESIGNATED TRAILS. This rule is especially important at these parks in order to preserve the fragile cryptogamic soils (figure 2). Cryptogamic soils are a complex of lichens, algae, moss and fungus that occurs as a black coating on the ground surface and as small mounds where it is well developed. It plays an extremely important role in the desert ecology. It binds the soil together and inhibits wind erosion and erosion by sheet wash.
    [Show full text]