Cfreptiles & Amphibians

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cfreptiles & Amphibians HTTPS://JOURNALS.KU.EDU/REPTILESANDAMPHIBIANSTABLE OF CONTENTS IRCF REPTILES & AMPHIBIANSREPTILES • VOL &15, AMPHIBIANS NO 4 • DEC 2008 • 27(3):397–410189 • DEC 2020 IRCF REPTILES & AMPHIBIANS CONSERVATION AND NATURAL HISTORY TABLE OF CONTENTS HerpetofaunaFEATURE ARTICLES of the Amarkantak Plateau . Chasing Bullsnakes (Pituophis catenifer sayi) in Wisconsin: On the Road to Understanding thein Ecology andCentral Conservation of the Midwest’s India Giant Serpent ...................... Joshua M. Kapfer 190 . The Shared History of Treeboas (Corallus grenadensis) and Humans on Grenada: A Hypothetical Excursion ............................................................................................................................Robert W. Henderson 198 Mukesh Ingle RESEARCH ARTICLES Reptile Conservation and Research Centre, Block No. 20, Vasant Vihar, Sector-C, Nanakheda, Ujjain–456010, Madhya Pradesh, India ([email protected]) . The Texas Horned Lizard in Central and Western Texas ....................... Emily Henry, Jason Brewer, Krista Mougey, and Gad Perry 204 . The Knight Anole (Anolis equestris) in FloridaPhotographs by the author except where indicated. .............................................Brian J. Camposano, Kenneth L. Krysko, Kevin M. Enge, Ellen M. Donlan, and Michael Granatosky 212 CONSERVATION ALERT Abstract.—I .conductedWorld’s Mammals herpetofaunal in Crisis ............................................................................................................................... surveys in poorly-explored sections of Central.............................. India: The Amarkantak 220 Plateau; The Son, Johila,. More and Than Narmada Mammals ............................................................................................................................... river lowlands; parts of the Maikal Mountain Range;....................................... and pockets of 223 the core zone area . The “Dow Jones Index” of Biodiversity ........................................................................................................................................... 225 of Achanakmar-Amarkantak Biosphere Reserve. I recorded a total of 61 species (17 amphibian and 44 reptilian spe- cies). NoteworthyHUSBANDRY findings included the rediscovery of the Critically Endangered Sacred Grove Bush Frog (Philautus sanctisilvaticus.)atCaptive its Caretype of localitythe Central afterNetted Dragon54 years, ....................................................................................................... new state records for Dobson’s Burrowing Shannon Frog Plummer (Sphaerotheca 226 dobsonii) and Beddome’sPROFILE Grass Skink (Eutropis beddomii), and significant new distributional records for a number of species. This study highlights. Kraig Adler: the A Lifetime importance Promoting Herpetology of landscape-level, ................................................................................................ long-term fieldwork to untangle Michael theL. Treglia hidden 234 diversity of the Amarkantak Plateau. COMMENTARY . iodiversity inventoriesThe Turtles Have and Been documentationWatching Me ........................................................................................................................ are criti- Mishra 1990; Verma et al. Eric 1993; Gangloff Mudgal 238 et al. 1997; Lal Bcally linkedBOOK to accurate REVIEW species identification (Nneji et and Kumar 1999; Singh et al. 2001; Khanna et al. 2001; al. 2019). Reptiles. Threatened and amphibians Amphibians of theplay World vital edited roles by S.N. in Stuart, eco- M. Hoffmann,Joshi et J.S. al. Chanson, 2010). N.A. The Cox, area also is home to larger animals systems as predators,R. prey, Berridge, herbivores, P. Ramani, and B.E.and Young commensal .............................................................................................................. taxa like the Bengal Tiger (Panthera Robert Powelltigris 243tigris), Indian Leopard (Wyman 1998; Hopkins 2007; Böhm et al. 2013). Herein I (Panthera pardus fusca), Sloth Bear (Melursus ursinus), Gaur CONSERVATION RESEARCH REPORTS: Summaries of Published Conservation Research Reports ................................. 245 provide an overview NATURAL of the HISTORY herpetofauna RESEARCH of theREPORTS Amarkantak: Summaries of Published(Bos gaurus Reports on), NaturalMugger History Crocodiles ................................. (Crocodylus 247 palustris), and Plateau (21°15'N–22°58'N, NEWBRIEFS ...............................................................................................................................81°25'E–82°05'E; central point myriad species....................................................... of deer, smaller carnivores, 248 and other verte- EDITORIAL INFORMATION ..................................................................................................................................................... 251 22°06'31"N, 81°44'53"E), FOCUS ON CONSERVATION which lies in: the A Project Achanakmar- You Can Support ...............................................................................................brate species (Roychoudhury et al. 2016). 252 The known fauna Amarkantak Biosphere Reserve (AABR) of Madhya Pradesh of the Achanakmar Tiger Reserve (ATR) comprises 734 and Chhattisgarh, India (Fig. 1). Situated at the junction of species, including 381 invertebrates belonging to 11 orders three major mountain ranges at elevations of 446–1,039 m asl, the area is characterized by Frontmountains, Cover. Shannon narrow Plummer. valleys, Back Cover. Michael Kern and high plains. Soils are generallyTotat lateritic, et velleseque alluvial, audant andmo black Totat et velleseque audant mo cotton types derived from granite,estibus gneisses, inveliquo and velique basalts. rerchil This estibus inveliquo velique rerchil erspienimus, quos accullabo. Ilibus erspienimus, quos accullabo. Ilibus ecologically diverse landscape isaut in dolor the apicto Deccan invere pePeninsular dolum aut dolor apicto invere pe dolum Biogeographic Zone of the countryfugiatis (Rodgersmaionsequat eumqueand Panwar fugiatis maionsequat eumque 1988) and comprised primarilymoditia of tropical erere nonsedis dry maor sectiatur decidu - moditia erere nonsedis ma sectia- ma derrovitae voluptam, as quos tur ma derrovitae voluptam, as ous forest biomes. The vegetationaccullabo. has been categorized as moist-deciduous forests, sal-forest (constituting 63% of the area), mixed-forest, riverine-forest, grassland, degraded-forest, and agro-forestry ecosystems (Roychoudhury et al. 2016). Wetlands include the Son, Johila, Narmada, Tipan, Bakan, Chandas, and Kewai Rivers and a number of smaller peren- nial and seasonal streams. Due to high annual rainfall (1,322–1,625 mm), high relative humidity, and suitable temperatures, the area har- bors a diverse and luxuriant flora comprising 1,527 iden- Fig. 1. Google Earth© image showing the location of the Amarkantak tified species, 324 species of identified fauna, and many Plateau in the Achanakmar-Amarkantak Biosphere Reserve (AABR) of more undocumented floral and faunal taxa (Saxena 1970; Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh, India. Copyright is held by the authors. Articles in R&A are made available under a 397 Reptiles & Amphibians ISSN 1098-6324 Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license. INGLE REPTILES & AMPHIBIANS • 27(3):397–410 • DEC 2020 and 353 vertebrates belonging to five classes (Chandra and The aim of this paper is to bring together information from Boaz 2018). The ATR also is regarded as an important habi- various sources, including peer-reviewed publications, reports, tat of two Critically Endangered species, the Sacred Grove and field observations, in order to document the herpetofau- Bush Frog (Raorchestes [formerly Philautus] sanctisilvaticus; nal diversity of the plateau and provide a baseline checklist. Amphibia: Rhacophoridae) and the White-rumped Vulture Threats to the herpetofaunal diversity of this unique land- (Gyps bengalensis; Aves: Accipitridae); two Endangered fau- scape also are discussed. nal species, the Clown Knife Fish (Notopterus chitala; Pisces: Notopteridae) and the Bengal Tiger (Panthera tigris tigris; Methods Mammalia: Felidae) in addition to supporting important Study Area.—The study area on the Amarkantak Plateau is populations of several species of fishes and freshwater turtles. located mainly in the Anuppur District of Madhya Pradesh Past studies of the herpetofauna in the area include those and the Bilaspur District of Chhattisgarh, India. I identified of Das and Chanda (1997), Chandra and Pandey (2004, and earmarked for surveys 14 study sites in this landscape 2005), Chandra and Gajbe (2005), Ingle (2012, 2018), (Table 1; Fig. 2). Using visual-encounter methods (Crump Chandra (2014), and Chandra and Boaz (2018). However, and Scott 1994), I conducted surveys during pre-monsoon, general information on diversity and distribution is scant. monsoon, and post-monsoon seasons on 11–12 April, 21–22 Table 1. Study sites on the Amarkantak Plateau. Amarkantak (Anuppur) (22°42'12.09"N, 81°43'29.22"E), elev. 1,018 m Human habitation surrounded by degraded grasslands, secondary growth, and abandoned construction. Narmada Udgam (Anuppur) (22°40'21.14"N, 81°45'34.26"E), elev. 1,039 m Human habitation with river and plantations; open fields with numerous temples. Kapildhara (Anuppur) (22°42'03.43"N, 81°42'19.96"E) elev. 996 m Mountainous and rocky; fast-flowing waterfall with riparian vegetation and large boulders
Recommended publications
  • Cfreptiles & Amphibians
    WWW.IRCF.ORG TABLE OF CONTENTS IRCF REPTILES &IRCF AMPHIBIANS REPTILES • VOL &15, AMPHIBIANS NO 4 • DEC 2008 • 189 27(2):288–292 • AUG 2020 IRCF REPTILES & AMPHIBIANS CONSERVATION AND NATURAL HISTORY TABLE OF CONTENTS FEATURE ARTICLES . Chasing BullsnakesAmphibians (Pituophis catenifer sayi) in Wisconsin: of the Melghat, On the Road to Understanding the Ecology and Conservation of the Midwest’s Giant Serpent ...................... Joshua M. Kapfer 190 . The Shared History of TreeboasMaharashtra, (Corallus grenadensis) and Humans on Grenada: India A Hypothetical Excursion ............................................................................................................................Robert W. Henderson 198 RESEARCH ARTICLES Hayat A. Qureshi and Gajanan A. Wagh . Biodiversity Research Laboratory,The Texas Horned Department Lizard in of Central Zoology, and ShriWestern Shivaji Texas Science ....................... College, Emily Amravati, Henry, Jason Maharashtra–444603, Brewer, Krista Mougey, India and Gad (gaj [email protected]) 204 . The Knight Anole (Anolis equestris) in Florida .............................................Brian J. Camposano,Photographs Kenneth L. Krysko, by the Kevin authors. M. Enge, Ellen M. Donlan, and Michael Granatosky 212 CONSERVATION ALERT . World’s Mammals in Crisis ............................................................................................................................................................. 220 . More Than Mammals .....................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Diversification and Cryptic Diversity of Ophisops Elegans (Sauria, Lacertidae)
    Received: 22 July 2019 | Revised: 10 December 2019 | Accepted: 20 December 2019 DOI: 10.1111/jzs.12369 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Diversification and cryptic diversity of Ophisops elegans (Sauria, Lacertidae) Claudine Montgelard1,2 | Roozbeh Behrooz1 | Véronique Arnal1 | Atefeh Asadi1 | Philippe Geniez1 | Mohammad Kaboli3 1CEFE, PSL-EPHE (Biogéographie et Ecologie des Vertébrés), CNRS, Université de Abstract Montpellier, Univ Paul Valéry Montpellier 3, Revealing cryptic diversity constitutes the backbone of the future identification and IRD, Montpellier, France description of a new lineage. For the genus Ophisops (Lacertidae), previous studies 2Department of Zoology, Centre for Ecological Genomics and Wildlife indicated that this genus is characterized by cryptic diversity as three clades were Conservation, University of Johannesburg, obtained for O. elegans and O. occidentalis that do not fit the classical systematics. Johannesburg, South Africa 3Department of Environmental Science, Notably, we were interested to delineate the distribution range of the two clades Faculty of Natural Resources, University of of O. elegans described in Iran. We sequenced 65 individuals of Ophisops mainly Tehran, Karaj, Iran from northwestern Iran for one mitochondrial (cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 [COI]; Correspondence 686 base pairs [bp]) and three nuclear genes (R35, MC1R, and PKM2; 1,857 bp). Claudine Montgelard, Biogéographie et Ecologie des Vertébrés (EPHE), Centre Phylogeographic analysis from mitochondrial and nuclear genes confirmed that d'Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive (UMR Iranian samples belong to two major haplogroups (divergence of 13% for COI) that 5175 CNRS), 1919 route de Mende, 34293 Montpellier cedex 5, France. are also split into several subclades (divergence of 6%–10% for COI), revealing an Email: [email protected] unsuspected diversity within Iranian Ophisops.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest of Madhya Pradesh
    Build Your Own Success Story! FOREST OF MADHYA PRADESH As per the report (ISFR) MP has the largest forest cover in the country followed by Arunachal Pradesh and Chhattisgarh. Forest Cover (Area-wise): Madhya Pradesh> Arunachal Pradesh> Chhattisgarh> Odisha> Maharashtra. Forest Cover (Percentage): Mizoram (85.4%)> Arunachal Pradesh (79.63%)> Meghalaya (76.33%) According to India State of Forest Report the recorded forest area of the state is 94,689 sq. km which is 30.72% of its geographical area. According to Indian state of forest Report (ISFR – 2019) the total forest cover in M.P. increased to 77,482.49 sq km which is 25.14% of the states geographical area. The forest area in MP is increased by 68.49 sq km. The first forest policy of Madhya Pradesh was made in 1952 and the second forest policy was made in 2005. Madhya Pradesh has a total of 925 forest villages of which 98 forest villages are deserted or located in national part and sanctuaries. MP is the first state to nationalise 100% of the forests. Among the districts, Balaghat has the densest forest cover, with 53.44 per cent of its area covered by forests. Ujjain (0.59 per cent) has the least forest cover among the districts In terms of forest canopy density classes: Very dense forest covers an area of 6676 sq km (2.17%) of the geograhical area. Moderately dense forest covers an area of 34, 341 sqkm (11.14% of geograhical area). Open forest covers an area of 36, 465 sq km (11.83% of geographical area) Madhya Pradesh has 0.06 sq km.
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Analysis of Correlated Evolution of Morphology and Ecological Diversification in Lacertid Lizards
    Butll. Soc. Cat. Herp., 19 (2011) Preliminary analysis of correlated evolution of morphology and ecological diversification in lacertid lizards Fèlix Amat Orriols Àrea d'Herpetologia, Museu de Granollers-Ciències Naturals. Francesc Macià 51. 08402 Granollers. Catalonia. Spain. [email protected] Resum S'ha investigat la diversitat morfològica en 129 espècies de lacèrtids i la seva relació amb l'ecologia, per mitjà de mètodes comparatius, utilitzant set variables morfomètriques. La mida corporal és la variable més important, determinant un gradient entre espècies de petita i gran mida independentment evolucionades al llarg de la filogènia dels lacèrtids. Aquesta variable està forta i positivament correlacionada amb les altres, emmascarant els patrons de diversitat morfològica. Anàlisis multivariants en les variables ajustades a la mida corporal mostren una covariació negativa entre les mides relatives de la cua i les extremitats. Remarcablement, les espècies arborícoles i semiarborícoles (Takydromus i el clade africà equatorial) han aparegut dues vegades independentment durant l'evolució dels lacèrtids i es caracteritzen per cues extremadament llargues i extremitats anteriors relativament llargues en comparació a les posteriors. El llangardaix arborícola i planador Holaspis, amb la seva cua curta, constitueix l’única excepció. Un altre cas de convergència ha estat trobat en algunes espècies que es mouen dins de vegetació densa o herba (Tropidosaura, Lacerta agilis, Takydromus amurensis o Zootoca) que presenten cues llargues i extremitats curtes. Al contrari, les especies que viuen en deserts, estepes o matollars amb escassa vegetació aïllada dins grans espais oberts han desenvolupat extremitats posteriors llargues i anteriors curtes per tal d'assolir elevades velocitats i maniobrabilitat. Aquest és el cas especialment de Acanthodactylus i Eremias Abstract Morphologic diversity was studied in 129 species of lacertid lizards and their relationship with ecology by means of comparative analysis on seven linear morphometric measurements.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Andaman and Nicobar Islands, Bay of Bengal
    Herpetology Notes, volume 13: 631-637 (2020) (published online on 05 August 2020) An update to species distribution records of geckos (Reptilia: Squamata: Gekkonidae) on the Andaman and Nicobar Islands, Bay of Bengal Ashwini V. Mohan1,2,* The Andaman and Nicobar Islands are rifted arc-raft of 2004, and human-mediated transport can introduce continental islands (Ali, 2018). Andaman and Nicobar additional species to these islands (Chandramouli, 2015). Islands together form the largest archipelago in the In this study, I provide an update for the occurrence Bay of Bengal and a high proportion of terrestrial and distribution of species in the family Gekkonidae herpetofauna on these islands are endemic (Das, 1999). (geckos) on the Andaman and Nicobar Islands. Although often lumped together, the Andamans and Nicobars are distinct from each other in their floral Materials and Methods and faunal species communities and are geographically Teams consisted of between 2–4 members and we separated by the 10° Channel. Several studies have conducted opportunistic visual encounter surveys in shed light on distribution, density and taxonomic accessible forested and human-modified areas, both aspects of terrestrial herpetofauna on these islands during daylight hours and post-sunset. These surveys (e.g., Das, 1999; Chandramouli, 2016; Harikrishnan were carried out specifically for geckos between and Vasudevan, 2018), assessed genetic diversity November 2016 and May 2017, this period overlapped across island populations (Mohan et al., 2018), studied with the north-east monsoon and summer seasons in the impacts of introduced species on herpetofauna these islands. A total of 16 islands in the Andaman and and biodiversity (e.g., Mohanty et al., 2016a, 2019), Nicobar archipelagos (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Hemidactylus Frenatus Across an Urban Gradient in Brisbane: Influence of Habitat and Potential for Impact on Native Gecko Species
    Presence of Asian House Gecko Hemidactylus frenatus across an urban gradient in Brisbane: influence of habitat and potential for impact on native gecko species Author Newbery, Brock, Jones, Darryl Published 2007 Book Title Pest or Guest: The Zoology of Overabundance Copyright Statement © 2007 Royal Zoological Society of NSW. The attached file is reproduced here in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Please refer to the book link for access to the definitive, published version. Downloaded from http://hdl.handle.net/10072/18554 Link to published version http://www.rzsnsw.org.au/ Griffith Research Online https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au Presence of Asian House Gecko Hemidactylus frenatus across an urban gradient in Brisbane: influence of habitat and potential for impact on native gecko species Brock Newbery1 and Darryl N. Jones1,2 1Suburban Wildlife Research Group, Australian School of Environmental Studies, Griffith University, Nathan, Qld. 4111, Australia. 2Corresponding author: Darryl Jones, [email protected] The Asian House Gecko Hemidactylus frenatus is an internationally significant invasive reptile which T has spread rapidly though the Pacific and elsewhere and has been implicated in the decline and extinction of a number of native gecko species. Although present in Darwin for some time, the C species has only recently become widespread in the Brisbane region. We investigated the density A and distribution of this and two native house-dwelling geckos in urban, suburban and bushland R environments within Brisbane. The spatially clumped insect resources associated with external light T sources were effectively utilised by both urban and suburban populations of Asian House Geckos, S suggesting likely competitive interactions between the species on structures where the species co-existed.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes and Comments on the Distribution of Two Endemic Lygosoma Skinks (Squamata: Scincidae: Lygosominae) from India
    Journal of Threatened Taxa | www.threatenedtaxa.org | 26 December 2014 | 6(14): 6726–6732 Note The family Scincidae is the Notes and comments on the distribution largest group among lizards, of two endemic Lygosoma skinks comprising more than 1558 species (Squamata: Scincidae: Lygosominae) ISSN 0974-7907 (Online) (Uetz & Hosek 2014). Of the from India ISSN 0974-7893 (Print) seven subfamilies recognized, the subfamily Lygosominae contains Raju Vyas OPEN ACCESS over 52 species in five genera (Uetz & Hosek 2014). The genus 505, Krishnadeep Tower, Mission Road, Fatehgunj, Vadodara, Gujarat Lygosoma Hardwicke & Gray, 1827 has a long and 390002, India [email protected] complicated nomenclatural history (see Geissler et al. 2011). In India, the genus Lygosoma is represented by nine species, of which five are endemic (Datta-Roy et al. 2014), including Günther’s Supple Skink Lygosoma City, Vadodara District and after examination both the guentheri (Peters, 1879) and the Lined Supple Skink skinks were released in the nearby riverine habitat of Lygosoma lineata (Gray, 1839). These are less studied, Vishwamitri River within the limits of the city area. terrestrial, insectivorous and diurnal supple-skinks Lygosoma guentheri: On 12 December 2013, a large (Molur & Walker 1998). Both these species are found adult specimen of Lygosoma (Image 1) was captured by in peninsular India and are classified ‘Least Concern’ a local rescue group from a garden in Vadodara City, species by the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species Gujarat. The specimen was identified as L. guentheri (Srinivasulu & Srinivasulu 2013a, b). with the help of the literature (Boulenger 1890; Smith Reserved forest and degraded areas of the northern 1935).
    [Show full text]
  • Occupational Structure of Population in Anuppur District: Geographical Analysis Dr
    IJA MH International Journal on Arts, Management and Humanities 6(2): 211-218(2017) ISSN No. (Online): 2319–5231 Occupational Structure of Population in Anuppur District: Geographical Analysis Dr. Richa Chaturvedi Assistant Professor, Department of Geography, Indira Gandhi National Tribal University, Amarkantak, (Madhya Pradesh), INDIA (Corresponding author: Dr. Richa Chaturvedi) (Received 09 November, 2017, Accepted 02 December, 2017) (Published by Research Trend, Website: www.researchtrend.net) ABSTRACT: Anuppur district is characterized by hilly to undulating terrain with certain pockets and belt of Sal and mixed forest. Physical feature of any region always influences the nature of the work and economic activities. So in Anuppur district, where both hill and plains features are exist which determine the occupational pattern of the region. The study of occupational structure dealing with working and non-working population has been carried out in the present study. The total working population in the district is recorded 49.40% of the total population. Percentage of main worker (62.52 %) is higher comparison to marginal worker (37.48 %). In 2011 there were 45.58 percent workers involve in cultivation, 29.88 percent in agricultural labourers, 1.50 percent in household industry and 23.04 percent worker in other economic activities. Key Words: Occupational structure, working population, main worker, marginal worker, non- working population I. INTRODUCTION In a society the term of ‘occupational structure’ refers to the mix of different types of occupations found there (Johnson, 2000) [1]. Work is defined as participation in any economically productive activity with or without compensation, wages or profit. Such participation may be physical and/or mental in nature.
    [Show full text]
  • Froglog95 New Version Draft1.Indd
    March 2011 Vol. 95 FrogLogwww.amphibians.org News from the herpetological community The new face of the ASG “Lost” Frogs Red List The global search Updating South comes to an end. Africas Red Where next? Lists. Page 1 FrogLog Vol. 95 | March 2011 | 1 2 | FrogLog Vol. 95 | March 2011 CONTENTS The Sierra Caral of Guatemala a refuge for endemic amphibians page 5 The Search for “Lost” Frogs page 12 Recent diversifi cation in old habitats: Molecules and morphology in the endangered frog, Craugastor uno page 17 Updating the IUCN Red List status of South African amphibians 6 Amphibians on the IUCN Red List: Developments and changes since the Global Amphibian Assessment 7 The forced closure of conservation work on Seychelles Sooglossidae 8 Alien amphibians challenge Darwin’s naturalization hypothesis 9 Is there a decline of amphibian richness in Bellanwila-Attidiya Sanctuary? 10 High prevalence of the amphibian chytrid pathogen in Gabon 11 Breeding-site selection by red-belly toads, Melanophryniscus stelzneri (Anura: Bufonidae), in Sierras of Córdoba, Argentina 11 Upcoming meetings 20 | Recent Publications 20 | Internships & Jobs 23 Funding Opportunities 22 | Author Instructions 24 | Current Authors 25 FrogLog Vol. 95 | March 2011 | 3 FrogLog Editorial elcome to the new-look FrogLog. It has been a busy few months Wfor the ASG! We have redesigned the look and feel of FrogLog ASG & EDITORIAL COMMITTEE along with our other media tools to better serve the needs of the ASG community. We hope that FrogLog will become a regular addition to James P. Collins your reading and a platform for sharing research, conservation stories, events, and opportunities.
    [Show full text]
  • An Annotated Type Catalogue of the Dragon Lizards (Reptilia: Squamata: Agamidae) in the Collection of the Western Australian Museum Ryan J
    RECORDS OF THE WESTERN AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM 34 115–132 (2019) DOI: 10.18195/issn.0312-3162.34(2).2019.115-132 An annotated type catalogue of the dragon lizards (Reptilia: Squamata: Agamidae) in the collection of the Western Australian Museum Ryan J. Ellis Department of Terrestrial Zoology, Western Australian Museum, Locked Bag 49, Welshpool DC, Western Australia 6986, Australia. Biologic Environmental Survey, 24–26 Wickham St, East Perth, Western Australia 6004, Australia. Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT – The Western Australian Museum holds a vast collection of specimens representing a large portion of the 106 currently recognised taxa of dragon lizards (family Agamidae) known to occur across Australia. While the museum’s collection is dominated by Western Australian species, it also contains a selection of specimens from localities in other Australian states and a small selection from outside of Australia. Currently the museum’s collection contains 18,914 agamid specimens representing 89 of the 106 currently recognised taxa from across Australia and 27 from outside of Australia. This includes 824 type specimens representing 45 currently recognised taxa and three synonymised taxa, comprising 43 holotypes, three syntypes and 779 paratypes. Of the paratypes, a total of 43 specimens have been gifted to other collections, disposed or could not be located and are considered lost. An annotated catalogue is provided for all agamid type material currently and previously maintained in the herpetological collection of the Western Australian Museum. KEYWORDS: type specimens, holotype, syntype, paratype, dragon lizard, nomenclature. INTRODUCTION Australia was named by John Edward Gray in 1825, The Agamidae, commonly referred to as dragon Clamydosaurus kingii Gray, 1825 [now Chlamydosaurus lizards, comprises over 480 taxa worldwide, occurring kingii (Gray, 1825)].
    [Show full text]
  • Madhya Pradesh Administrative Divisions 2011
    MADHYA PRADESH ADMINISTRATIVE DIVISIONS 2011 U T KILOMETRES 40 0 40 80 120 T N Porsa ! ! ! Ater Ambah Gormi Morena ! P Bhind P A ! BHIND MORENA ! Mehgaon! A ! Ron Gohad ! Kailaras Joura Mihona Sabalgarh ! ! P ! ! Gwalior H ! Dabra Seondha ! GWALIOR ! Lahar R Beerpur Vijaypur ! ! Chinour Indergarh Bhitarwar DATIA Bhander ! T SHEOPUR Datia ! Sheopur Pohri P P P ! ! Narwar R Karahal Shivpuri A ! Karera Badoda P SHIVPURI ! S ! N!iwari D D ! ! Pichhore Orchh!a Gaurihar ! D Nowgong E ! Prithvipur Laundi Kolaras ! Chandla Jawa ! D TIKAMGARHPalera ! ! ! ! Teonthar A ! ! Jatara ! ! Maharajpur Khaniyadhana ! Sirmour Bad!arwas Mohangarh P ! Ajaigarh ! Naigarhi S ! ! Majhgawan ! REWA ! ! ! Chhatarpur Rajnagar ! Semaria ! ! Khargapur Birsinghpur Mangawan Hanumana Singoli Bamori Isagarh Chanderi ! CHHATARPUR (Raghurajnagar) ! Guna ! P Baldeogarh P Kotar (Huzur) Maugan!j Shadhora Panna P ! Raipur-Karchuliyan ! Chitrangi ! ASHOKNAGAR Tikamgarh Bijawar ! Rampur P ! J Jawad P ! ! DevendranagarNago!d !Gurh Sihawal ! ! P Baghelan ! Churhat GUNA Bada Malhera ! ! P H NEEMUCH Bhanpura Ashoknagar ! !Gunnor (Gopadbanas) ! I Raghogarh N Ghuwara D ! SATNA I ! ! A P ! Manasa ! Mungaoli PANNA Unchahara !Amarpatan Rampur Naikin Neemuch ! ! ! Amanganj SINGRAULI ! Aron ! Shahgarh Buxwaha ! Pawai SIDHI ! Kumbhraj Bina ! ! Ram!nagar !Majhauli Deosar Jiran Malhargarh Garoth Hatta ! ! Kurwai ! Shahnagar Maihar P ! ! Maksoodanga!rh Malthon Batiyagarh ! MANDSAUR ! ! ! Beohari Singrauli Mandsaur Shamgarh Jirapur ! Chachaura Lateri Sironj Khurai Raipura ! ! ! A ! P ! ! ! !
    [Show full text]
  • Literature Cited in Lizards Natural History Database
    Literature Cited in Lizards Natural History database Abdala, C. S., A. S. Quinteros, and R. E. Espinoza. 2008. Two new species of Liolaemus (Iguania: Liolaemidae) from the puna of northwestern Argentina. Herpetologica 64:458-471. Abdala, C. S., D. Baldo, R. A. Juárez, and R. E. Espinoza. 2016. The first parthenogenetic pleurodont Iguanian: a new all-female Liolaemus (Squamata: Liolaemidae) from western Argentina. Copeia 104:487-497. Abdala, C. S., J. C. Acosta, M. R. Cabrera, H. J. Villaviciencio, and J. Marinero. 2009. A new Andean Liolaemus of the L. montanus series (Squamata: Iguania: Liolaemidae) from western Argentina. South American Journal of Herpetology 4:91-102. Abdala, C. S., J. L. Acosta, J. C. Acosta, B. B. Alvarez, F. Arias, L. J. Avila, . S. M. Zalba. 2012. Categorización del estado de conservación de las lagartijas y anfisbenas de la República Argentina. Cuadernos de Herpetologia 26 (Suppl. 1):215-248. Abell, A. J. 1999. Male-female spacing patterns in the lizard, Sceloporus virgatus. Amphibia-Reptilia 20:185-194. Abts, M. L. 1987. Environment and variation in life history traits of the Chuckwalla, Sauromalus obesus. Ecological Monographs 57:215-232. Achaval, F., and A. Olmos. 2003. Anfibios y reptiles del Uruguay. Montevideo, Uruguay: Facultad de Ciencias. Achaval, F., and A. Olmos. 2007. Anfibio y reptiles del Uruguay, 3rd edn. Montevideo, Uruguay: Serie Fauna 1. Ackermann, T. 2006. Schreibers Glatkopfleguan Leiocephalus schreibersii. Munich, Germany: Natur und Tier. Ackley, J. W., P. J. Muelleman, R. E. Carter, R. W. Henderson, and R. Powell. 2009. A rapid assessment of herpetofaunal diversity in variously altered habitats on Dominica.
    [Show full text]