DOCSLIB.ORG

Extension to Mezzanine Floor and Addition of New Raised Roof to Retail Units at Units MSU10 and 33 at White Rose Shopping Centre, Dewsbury Road, LS11

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Extension to Mezzanine Floor and Addition of New Raised Roof to Retail Units at Units MSU10 and 33 at White Rose Shopping Centre, Dewsbury Road, LS11 Originator: Martha Hughe s Tel: 0113 395 1378 Report of the Chief Planning Officer PLANS PANEL EAST Date: 8th April 2010 Subject: APPLICATION 10/00773/FU – Extension to mezzanine floor and addition of new raised roof to retail units at Units MSU10 and 33 at White Rose Shopping Centre, Dewsbury Road, LS11 APPLICANT DATE VALID TARGET DATE Land Securities Group Plc 25 February 2010 22 April 2010 and H and M Hennes and Moritz (UK) Electoral Wards Affected: Specific Implications For: Morley North Equality and Diversity Community Cohesion √ Ward Members consulted Narrowing the Gap (referred to in report) RECOMMENDATION: DEFER and DELEGATE approval to the Chief Planning officer subject to the conditions specified ( and any others which he might consider appropriate )and the completion of a legal agreement within 3 months from the date of resolution unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Chief Planning Officer, for the submission of an outline application (within 6 months) to apply for additional floorspace at the White Rose Centre (up to 2,500 square metres of A1 floorspace and 1,800 square metres of A3/A4/A5 floorspace) which would also be accompanied by planning obligations to deal with the following matters; - The ability to install a mezzanine floor of 200 square metres or less in each individual unit in the WRC without planning permission will be removed. This equates to potentially 7,946 squares metres of mezzanine floorspace that does not currently require planning permission and this right will be removed. - The floorspace for A1 (2,500 square metres) will be reduced by the floorspace granted on Unit MSU 10 (452 square metres), - for the additional floorspace to relate to existing occupiers only - for the application not to be implemented until works have recommenced on the Trinity Quarter development in the city centre. 1. Standard time limit (3 years) 2. Materials to match existing 3. Local employment 4. Development in accordance with the approved plans and the s106 agreement. Reasons for approval: This application proposes additional retail floorspace in an out of centre location which would normally be regarded as unacceptable in terms of national and local planning policy which seeks to direct retailing to Town Centre locations. However, it is considered that on balance this proposal is acceptable when considered in the context of the opportunity it offers to regulate the possible future expansion of the White Rose Centre and protect the vitality and viability of the city centre and other centres by restricting the potential to create additional retail floorspace without planning permission, and restricting any future development pending the recommencement of development at the Trinity Quarter. As such, this application is considered acceptable subject to the completion of a legal agreement. 1.0 INTRODUCTION: 1.1 This application is for an extension to an existing mezzanine in excess of the 200 square metres which can be carried out without planning permission, at the White Rose Centre. The White Rose Centre is not an identified town centre and the proposal therefore constitutes out of centre development. The application is brought to Members as a precursor to a further application which would limit further expansion (which could be carried out without planning permission) to overcome concerns relating to a previous application and therefore restrict piecemeal expansion of this out of town shopping location. 2.0 PROPOSAL: 2.1 The application proposes an extension to an existing mezzanine at Unit MSU10 (currently occupied by Clinton Cards). The proposed extension is to enable the unit to be altered to meet the requirements of the applicant H & M. The applicant states that low vacancy rates at the White Rose have lead to circumstances where retailers have wanted to change their representation in the centre in response to economic conditions either through expansion or relocation to smaller units. 2.2 The proposal is to extend the existing mezzanine by 452 square metres and to raise the height of the building to increase the floor to ceiling height at ground floor and mezzanine level within the unit. 2.3 The applicant advises that the total floorspace within the White Rose Centre is 58,300 square metres gross and the proposed extension represents an increase in total retail floorspace of less than 1%. 2.4 The applicant advises that Clinton Cards intends to relocate to a smaller unit within the White Rose Centre. 2.5 Members should be aware that this application is a resubmission of application 09/03808/FU which was refused by Officers last year due to concerns that the application would be contrary to policy S9 of the UDP Review and guidance set out in PPS6 – Planning for Town Centres, and that the proposal would have a small but unacceptable impact on Leeds city and town centres and put at risk future investment in in-centre retail floorspace and the ability to fill vacant floorspace and that the application would make it more difficult for the Council to resist further similar out of centre development. 2.6 The applicant has sought to address current guidance within Planning Policy Statement 4 and also the impact on Leeds City Centre..The applicant also looks at the additional floorspace which could be carried out in the White Rose Centre without planning permission. The suggestion is that each unit at the Centre could accommodate a mezzanine of up to 200 square metres as this is threshold set for works affecting the interior of a building which do not constitute development. 2.7 The applicant has provided Leading Counsel’s advice with the planning application on the issue of the creation of mezzanines of up to 200 square metres of retail floorspace without the need for planning permission and whether this applies to an individual unit within the White Rose Centre. The advice is that the relevant provisions should apply to individual units within the White Rose Centre. This issue is considered in more detail later on in this report. 2.8 Based on the provision of 200 square metres for mezzanine development per unit, the applicant states that there is the potential to provide an additional 7, 946 square metres of additional floorspace without the need to apply for planning permission and that this would represent a 12 % increase in total floorspace within the White Rose Centre. 2.9 In order to deal with the Council’s concerns regarding incremental uncontrolled expansion of retail floorspace in the White Rose Centre , this application is submitted on the basis of discussions to remove the rights to create additional retail floorspace in the Centre without planning permission and to agree the total additional floorspace which may be acceptable. This will be secured through a s106 planning obligation requiring the submission of a further outline planning application for the additional floorspace to meet the needs of existing traders at the centre. 2.10 The applicant is also the developer for the Trinity Square development within the city centre and as part of this application is proposing a planning obligation that in the event that planning permission is granted to limit the amount of additional floorspace at the White Rose Centre, this planning permission would not be implemented until works at Trinity Square have recommenced. 3.0 SITE AND SURROUNDINGS: 3.1 The White Rose Shopping Centre is a substantial retail centre in south Leeds comprising over 100 shop units and 4800 car parking spaces including a Sainsbury’s supermarket. It is one of the three main destinations for comparison shopping in the Leeds district along with the City Centre and Owlcotes shopping centre at Pudsey. The centre was built in the 1990’s after being refused planning permission by LCC and subsequently allowed on appeal in 1989. This proposal is for alterations to two of the existing ground floor shop units to the south side of the central atrium. 4.0 RELEVANT PLANNING HISTORY: 4.1 09/03808/FU - Extension to mezzanine floor and addition of new raised roof to retail units. Refused under delegated powers on 24.11.09 for the following reasons; 1. The proposed additional retail floorspace is contrary to local and national planning policy which seeks to direct retailing to Town Centre locations. This proposal has failed to demonstrate through a sequential approach to site selection that there are no suitable Town Centre locations for the development, and as such the proposal is contrary to Policy S9 of Leeds Unitary Development Plan Review 2006, and to Government guidance set out in PPS6 'Planning for Town Centres'. 2. The proposal will have a small but unacceptable impact on Leeds' city and town centres in terms of trade diversion and put at risk future investment in in- centre retail floorspace and the ability to fill vacant floorspace. The impact will be worsened in combination with further similar out-of-centre proposals which would be more difficult to resist if this proposal were permitted. As such, the proposal would be contrary to UDPR Policies SP7 and S9, to the Yorkshire & Humber Plan Policy E2 and to Government guidance set out in PPS6 'Planning for Town Centres'. 4.2 07/01521/FU - Single storey extension to form retail unit to bus terminus – approved 16 May 2007 (44m2 increase in floorspace) 4.3 06/04798/FU – Single storey rear extension to shop – approved 9 October 2006 (23m2 increase in floorspace) 4.4 23/295/94/RM – Reserved matters application for shopping centre – approved 2 December 1994 4.5 23/59/87 – Outline application for shopping centre – refused by LCC and then allowed on appeal 30 January 1989 5.0 HISTORY OF NEGOTIATIONS: 5.1 Following the refusal of application 09/03808/FU discussions have taken place with the officers concerning the proposal and the White Rose Centre’s requirements for flexibility, together with the works which could be carried out without the need for planning permission and the potential impact of this to other identified centres.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • KTT Report Structure
    Knowledge and Technology Exchange in Further Education Colleges September 2005 By Professor Sa’ad Medhat PhD MPhil CEng FIEE FCIM FCMI MInstD New Engineering Foundation Conducted by: New Engineering Foundation Erico House 93-99 Upper Richmond Road London SW15 2TG www.neweng.org.uk Email: [email protected] Tel: 020 8786 3677 Supported by: Gatsby Technical Education Projects Allington House 150 Victoria Street London SW1E 5AE www.gtep.co.uk Table of Contents Acknowledgements 4 1.0 Executive Summary 10 2.0 Introduction 23 3.0 Rationale 24 4.0 Research Methodology 25 5.0 Findings 26 5.1 The Survey 26 5.2 Key Findings from Interviews with FE Colleges 46 5.3 Professional Development 49 5.4 Funding Knowledge Transfer / Exchange in FE Colleges 49 5.5 Views of Business and Employer Associations 53 5.6 Roles of Higher Education 54 5.7 Roles of Regional Development Agencies 55 5.8 Key Findings from Discussions with Sector Skills Councils 56 5.9 Impact on Students 57 5.10 Summary of Findings 58 6.0 Recommendations 59 7.0 The Knowledge and Technology Exchange Nodes (K-TEN) 61 8.0 Establishing Good Practice for KTT 62 9.0 K-TEN Operational Structure 63 10.0 Overall Conclusions 64 Appendices Appendix A – List of Participatory FE Colleges Appendix B – Business and Industry Input Appendix C – References Appendix D – The New Engineering Advisory Panel Knowledge and Technology Exchange in Further Education Colleges/August 2005 3-76 Acknowledgements The project reported here was commissioned by Gatsby Technical Education Projects (GTEP) and carried out by the New Engineering Foundation1.
    [Show full text]
  • Bargain Booze Limited Wine Rack Limited Conviviality Retail
    www.pwc.co.uk In accordance with Paragraph 49 of Schedule B1 of the Insolvency Act 1986 and Rule 3.35 of the Insolvency (England and Wales) Rules 2016 Bargain Booze Limited High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Date 13 April 2018 Insolvency & Companies List (ChD) CR-2018-002928 Anticipated to be delivered on 16 April 2018 Wine Rack Limited High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Insolvency & Companies List (ChD) CR-2018-002930 Conviviality Retail Logistics Limited High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Insolvency & Companies List (ChD) CR-2018-002929 (All in administration) Joint administrators’ proposals for achieving the purpose of administration Contents Abbreviations and definitions 1 Why we’ve prepared this document 3 At a glance 4 Brief history of the Companies and why they’re in administration 5 What we’ve done so far and what’s next if our proposals are approved 10 Estimated financial position 15 Statutory and other information 16 Appendix A: Recent Group history 19 Appendix B: Pre-administration costs 20 Appendix C: Copy of the Joint Administrators’ report to creditors on the pre- packaged sale of assets 22 Appendix D: Estimated financial position including creditors’ details 23 Appendix E: Proof of debt 75 Joint Administrators’ proposals for achieving the purpose of administration Joint Administrators’ proposals for achieving the purpose of administration Abbreviations and definitions The following table shows the abbreviations
    [Show full text]
  • Venue Id Venue Name Address 1 City Postcode Venue Type
    Venue_id Venue_name Address_1 City Postcode Venue_type 2012292 Plough 1 Lewis Street Aberaman CF44 6PY Retail - Pub 2011877 Conway Inn 52 Cardiff Street Aberdare CF44 7DG Retail - Pub 2006783 McDonald's - 902 Aberdare Gadlys Link Road ABERDARE CF44 7NT Retail - Fast Food 2009437 Rhoswenallt Inn Werfa Aberdare CF44 0YP Retail - Pub 2011896 Wetherspoons 6 High Street Aberdare CF44 7AA Retail - Pub 2009691 Archibald Simpson 5 Castle Street Aberdeen AB11 5BQ Retail - Pub 2003453 BAA - Aberdeen Aberdeen Airport Aberdeen AB21 7DU Transport - Small Airport 2009128 Britannia Hotel Malcolm Road Aberdeen AB21 9LN Retail - Pub 2014519 First Scot Rail - Aberdeen Guild St Aberdeen AB11 6LX Transport - Local rail station 2009345 Grays Inn Greenfern Road Aberdeen AB16 5PY Retail - Pub 2011456 Liquid Bridge Place Aberdeen AB11 6HZ Retail - Pub 2012139 Lloyds No.1 (Justice Mill) Justice Mill Aberdeen AB11 6DA Retail - Pub 2007205 McDonald's - 1341 Asda Aberdeen Garthdee Road Aberdeen AB10 7BA Retail - Fast Food 2006333 McDonald's - 398 Aberdeen 1 117 Union Street ABERDEEN AB11 6BH Retail - Fast Food 2006524 McDonald's - 618 Bucksburn Inverurie Road ABERDEEN AB21 9LZ Retail - Fast Food 2006561 McDonald's - 663 Bridge Of Don Broadfold Road ABERDEEN AB23 8EE Retail - Fast Food 2010111 Menzies Farburn Terrace Aberdeen AB21 7DW Retail - Pub 2007684 Triplekirks Schoolhill Aberdeen AB12 4RR Retail - Pub 2002538 Swallow Thainstone House Hotel Inverurie Aberdeenshire AB51 5NT Hotels - 4/5 Star Hotel with full coverage 2002546 Swallow Waterside Hotel Fraserburgh
    [Show full text]
  • Groceries Market Investigation (Controlled Land) Order 2010
    THE GROCERIES MARKET INVESTIGATION (CONTROLLED LAND) ORDER 2010 Notice of making an Order 1. On 9 May 2006, the Office of Fair Trading (OFT), in exercise of its powers under section 131 of the Enterprise Act 2002 (the Act), referred to the Competition Commission (CC), for investigation and report, the supply of groceries by retailers in the United Kingdom. 2. The CC investigated the matters referred to it in accordance with section 131 of the Act and concluded, in accordance with section 134(1), that there were features of the market, either alone or in combination, which prevent, restrict or distort competition within the relevant market, and in accordance with section 134(2) that an adverse effect on competition existed. These conclusions were published on 30 April 2008 in its report The supply of groceries in the UK market investigation (Final Report). 3. The CC found that two of the features that adversely affected competition in the market (whether alone or in combination) were the high levels of concentration in local markets for the supply of groceries by mid-sized and larger grocery stores, and the control of land in highly-concentrated local markets by incumbent retailers. 4. The CC found that there was a detrimental effect on customers resulting from the adverse effect on competition and considered, in accordance with section 134(4), whether action should be taken by it, or whether it should recommend the taking of action by others, for the purpose of remedying, mitigating or preventing the adverse effect on competition concerned or the detrimental effect on customers so far as it has resulted from, or may be expected to result from, the adverse effect on competition.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Securities Capital Markets
    SUPPLEMENT DATED 21 DECEMBER 2017 TO THE BASE PROSPECTUS DATED 2 AUGUST 2017 LAND SECURITIES CAPITAL MARKETS PLC (incorporated in England and Wales with limited liability under registered number 5193511) £6,000,000,000 Multicurrency Programme for the issuance of Notes This Supplement (the “Supplement”) supplements the Base Prospectus dated 2 August 2017 (the “Base Prospectus”) the £6,000,000,000 Multicurrency Programme (the “Programme”) for the issuance of Notes established by Land Securities Capital Markets PLC (the “Issuer”). Terms defined in the Base Prospectus have the same meaning when used in this Supplement. This Supplement is supplemental to, and should be read in conjunction with, the Base Prospectus and any other supplements to the Base Prospectus issued by the Issuer. This Supplement has been approved by the Central Bank of Ireland, as competent authority under Directive 2003/71/EC, as amended including by Directive 2010/73/EU (the “Prospectus Directive”). The Central Bank of Ireland only approves this Supplement as meeting the requirements imposed under Irish and EU law pursuant to the Prospectus Directive. This Supplement constitutes a supplement for the purposes of the Prospectus Directive. This Supplement constitutes neither an offer nor a solicitation of an offer to buy any Notes by any person in any jurisdiction in which it is unlawful for such person to make such an offer or solicitation. The Issuer accepts responsibility for the information contained in this Supplement. To the best of the knowledge of the Issuer (which has taken all reasonable care to ensure that such is the case) the information contained in this Supplement is in accordance with the facts and does not omit anything likely to affect the import of such information.
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamic Trip Modelling the Geojournal Library
    Dynamic Trip Modelling The GeoJournal Library Volume 84 Managing Editor: Max Barlow, Toronto, Canada Founding Series Editor: Wolf Tietze, Helmstedt, Germany Editorial Board: Paul Claval, France Yehuda Gradus, Israel Sam Ock Park, South Korea Herman van der Wusten, The Netherlands The titles published in this series are listed at the end of this volume. Dynamic Trip Modelling From Shopping Centres to the Internet by ROBERT G.V. BAKER School of Human and Environmental Studies, University of New England, Australia A C.I.P.Catalogue record for this book is available from the Library of Congress ISBN-10 1-4020-4345-7 (HB) ISBN-13 978-1-4020-4345-1 (HB) ISBN-10 1-4020-4346-5 (e-book) ISBN-13 978-1-4020-4346-8 (e-book) Published by Springer, P.O. Box 17, 3300 AA Dordrecht, The Netherlands. www.springer.com Printed on acid-free paper All Rights Reserved © 2006 Springer No part of this work may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, microfilming, recording or otherwise, without written permission from the Publisher, with the exception of any material supplied specifically for the purpose of being entered and executed on a computer system, for exclusive use by the purchaser of the work. Printed in the Netherlands. To Sue, Kristen and Cameron Contents Preface ix Illustrations xi Chapter 1: Introduction 1 1.1 Shopping Change 1 1.2 Definitions of Retail Forms Underpinning the Model 6 1.3 The Time-space Convergence 16 1.4 A Way Forward 18 Chapter 2: An Introduction
    [Show full text]
  • VALUATION REPORT Toucan & Peacock Portfolio's
    VALUATION REPORT Toucan & Peacock Portfolio’s Eurynome LLC 160 Greentree Drive Suite 101 City of Dover Kent County Delaware United States and Credit Suisse Securities (Europe) Limited One Cabot Square London E14 4QJ 26 October 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. VALUATION SUMMARY . Valuation Statement . Assumptions, Extent Of Due Diligence Enquiries And Sources Of Information . Executive Summary of Market Values 2. PROPERTY COMMENTARIES a) 34/50 Cheapside & 6-14 Albert Street East, Barnsley S70 1RQ b) The Grand Buildings, 66-100 Jameson Street, Hull HU1 3JX c) 19/21 Albion Place, Leeds LS1 6JS d) 202 High Street, Lincoln LN5 7AU e) 32 Lister Gate, Nottingham NG1 7DD f) 24 Broad Street, Reading RG1 2BT g) 12 Culver Street West & 22/24 High Street, Colchester CO1 1XJ h) 11 Broad Street, Reading RG1 2BH i) 28 High Street, Winchester SO23 9BL j) 37/39 Fore Street, Taunton TA1 1HR k) 28/30 King Street, Manchester M2 6AZ l) 74/76 English Street, Carlisle CA3 9HP m) 86/87/87a Broad Street, Reading RG1 2AP n) 20/22 Queen Street, Cardiff CF10 2BU 3. APPENDICES a) Engagement Letter Toucan & Peacock Portfolio’s 26 October 2015 1 1. VALUATION SUMMARY Toucan & Peacock Portfolio’s 26 October 2015 2 Strutt & Parker LLP 13 Hill Street Berkeley Square London W1J 5LQ Telephone: 020 7629 7282 Fax: 020 7629 0387 E-Mail: [email protected] VALUATION STATEMENT REPORT DATE 26 October 2015 ADDRESSEES We confirm that our Report and Valuation can be disclosed to and relied upon by: (a) Elavon Financial Services Limited as the loan facility agent, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Horsforth - Pudsey - Seacroft 9 Via White Rose Centre & Swillington
    Horsforth - Pudsey - Seacroft 9 via White Rose Centre & Swillington Service 9 via Colton: From Horsforth Church Rd via Church Ln, Town St, Fink Hill, Broadway, Horsforth New Rd, Rodley Ln, Rodley Town St, Coal Hill Ln, Bagley Ln, Farsley Town St, Old Rd, Bradford Rd, Richardshaw Ln, Lidget Hill, Church Ln, Pudsey Bus Station, Church Ln, Lowtown, Swinnow Rd, Stanningley By-pass, Ring Road Beeston, White Rose Shopping Centre, Ring Road Beeston, Dewsbury Rd, Ring Road Beeston Park, Middleton Park Rd, Ring Road Middleton, Throstle Rd, Sharp Ln, Leeds Rd, Leadwell Ln, Carlton Ln, Marsh St, Gillett Ln, Park Ln, Styebank Ln, Leeds Rd, Calverley Rd, Aberford Rd, Wakefield Rd, Church Ln, Neville Grove, Swillington Ln, Selby Rd, Stile Hill Way, Colton Rd East, Colton Ln, Ring Road Halton, Station Rd, Ring Road Cross Gates, Ring Road Seacroft, Stocks Approach, York Rd to Seacroft Bus Station. From Seacroft Bus Station via York Rd, Barwick Rd, Ring Road Cross Gates, Station Rd, Ring Road Halton, Colton Ln, Colton Road East, Stile Hill Way, Selby Rd, Swillington Ln, Neville Gr, Church Ln, Wakefield Rd, Aberford Rd, Calverley Rd, Leeds Rd, Styebank Ln, Park Ln, Gillett Ln, Marsh St, Carlton Ln, Leadwell Ln, Leeds Rd, Sharp Ln, Throstle Rd, Ring Rd Middleton, Middleton Park Rd, Ring Rd Beeston Park, Dewsbury Rd, Ring Rd Beeston, White Rose Centre, Ring Rd Beeston, Stanningley-by-pass, Swinnow Rd, Lowtown, Church Ln, Pudsey Bus Station, Church Ln, Lidget Hill, Richardshaw Ln, Bradford Rd, Old Rd, Farsley Town St, Bagley Ln, Coal Hill Ln, Rodley Town St, Rodley Ln, Horsforth New Rd, Broadway, Fink Hill to Horsforth Church Rd.
    [Show full text]
  • Property Today: What Differentiates a Leader from a Follower? Creating Value Using Our Expertise Acting Responsibly
    Annual Report 2005 Property today: what differentiates a leader from a follower? Creating value Using our expertise Acting responsibly We are delighted to report on an outstanding We have focused our activities on areas of Land Securities’ core values of integrity, year for Land Securities, generating a return the market where we can benefit fully from customer service, respect for the individual, on equity for shareholders of 21.3% (pre- the expertise of our people. Section Two of excellence and innovation instil in our exceptional charge), and a 16.6% increase in the Operating and Financial Review people a strong desire to manage the the total dividend this year. In the Chairman’s demonstrates how we are using this business in a responsible way. Section Three Statement and the first section of the expertise to create value. Here, we explain brings together all the elements of the Operating and Financial Review we discuss the the performance and activity of our Retail, Annual Report which demonstrate how key financial and operational highlights and London and Property Outsourcing we live up to these values. Page 57 performance drivers for the business.We also businesses as well as providing an update review our operating environment and the on our Urban Community Development prospects for the business. Page 11 activities. Page 31 2 Introduction Operating and financial review continued 58 3.0 Board of Directors 12 1.0 Chairman’s Statement 32 2.0 Customer Service 60 3.1 Corporate Responsibility 16 1.1 Operating and Financial Review 34 2.1
    [Show full text]
  • Land Securities Capital Markets
    SUPPLEMENT DATED 23 JANUARY 2017 TO THE BASE PROSPECTUS DATED 15 JULY 2016 LAND SECURITIES CAPITAL MARKETS PLC (incorporated in England and Wales with limited liability under registered number 5193511) £6,000,000,000 Multicurrency Programme for the issuance of Notes This Supplement (the “Supplement”) supplements the Base Prospectus dated 15 July 2016 (the “Base Prospectus”) relating to the £6,000,000,000 Multicurrency Programme (the “Programme”) for the issuance of Notes established by Land Securities Capital Markets PLC (the “Issuer”). Terms defined in the Base Prospectus have the same meaning when used in this Supplement. This Supplement is supplemental to, and should be read in conjunction with, the Base Prospectus and any other supplements to the Base Prospectus issued by the Issuer. This Supplement has been approved by the Central Bank of Ireland, as competent authority under Directive 2003/71/EC, as amended including by Directive 2010/73/EU (the “Prospectus Directive”). The Central Bank of Ireland only approves this Supplement as meeting the requirements imposed under Irish and EU law pursuant to the Prospectus Directive. This Supplement constitutes a supplement for the purposes of the Prospectus Directive. This Supplement constitutes neither an offer nor a solicitation of an offer to buy any Notes by any person in any jurisdiction in which it is unlawful for such person to make such an offer or solicitation. The Issuer accepts responsibility for the information contained in this Supplement. To the best of the knowledge of the Issuer (which has taken all reasonable care to ensure that such is the case) the information contained in this Supplement is in accordance with the facts and does not omit anything likely to affect the import of such information.
    [Show full text]
  • 3A Bus Time Schedule & Line Route
    3A bus time schedule & line map 3A White Rose Centre - Gledhow View In Website Mode The 3A bus line (White Rose Centre - Gledhow) has 6 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) Beeston <-> Gledhow: 5:57 AM - 6:00 AM (2) Gledhow <-> White Rose Centre: 6:01 AM - 10:42 PM (3) Leeds City Centre <-> Gledhow: 6:50 AM (4) White Rose Centre <-> Gledhow: 6:42 AM - 10:07 PM (5) White Rose Centre <-> Harehills: 5:42 PM - 10:32 PM (6) White Rose Centre <-> Leeds City Centre: 6:48 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest 3A bus station near you and ƒnd out when is the next 3A bus arriving. Direction: Beeston <-> Gledhow 3A bus Time Schedule 35 stops Beeston <-> Gledhow Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday 7:25 AM Monday 5:57 AM - 6:00 AM Waincliffe Drive, Beeston Dewsbury Road, Leeds Tuesday 5:57 AM - 6:00 AM Tommy Wass Junction, Beeston Wednesday 5:57 AM - 6:00 AM 434 Dewsbury Road, Leeds Thursday 5:57 AM - 6:00 AM Barkly Road, Beeston Friday 5:57 AM 388-390 Dewsbury Road, Leeds Saturday Not Operational Cross Flatts Grove, Beeston 5 Cross Flatts Avenue, Leeds Cross Flatts Park, Beeston Back Burlington Place, Leeds 3A bus Info Direction: Beeston <-> Gledhow Hunslet Fire Stn, Beeston Stops: 35 Woodview Grove, Leeds Trip Duration: 40 min Line Summary: Waincliffe Drive, Beeston, Tommy Oakley Terrace, Beeston Wass Junction, Beeston, Barkly Road, Beeston, Trentham Terrace, Leeds Cross Flatts Grove, Beeston, Cross Flatts Park, Beeston, Hunslet Fire Stn, Beeston, Oakley Terrace, Dewsbury Road Hub, Beeston Hill Beeston, Dewsbury
    [Show full text]
  • Registered Pharmacies 2017-02-28
    The list of pharmacies registered to sell PPCs on our behalf is sorted alphabetically in postcode order. 0 NAME PREMISES ADDRESS 1 PREMISES ADDRESS 2 PREMISES ADDRESS 3 PREMISES ADDRESS 4 BOOTS UK LIMITED 9 ST PETERS STREET ST.ALBANS HERTFORDSHIRE AL1 3DH FREEMAN GRIEVES LTD 111-113 ST PETERS STREET ST.ALBANS HERTFORDSHIRE AL1 3ET IMED PHARMACY 67 HATFIELD ROAD ST ALBANS HERTFORDSHIRE AL1 4JE MANOR PHARMACY (WHEATHAMPSTEAD) LTD 2 HIGH STREET WHEATHAMPSTEAD HERTFORDSHIRE AL4 8AA BOOTS UK LIMITED 23-25 HIGH STREET HARPENDEN HERTFORDSHIRE AL5 2RU BOOTS UK LIMITED 65 MOORS WALK WELWYN GARDEN CITY HERTFORDSHIRE AL7 2BQ BOOTS UK LIMITED 31 COLE GREEN LANE WELWYN GARDEN CITY HERTFORDSHIRE AL7 3PP PEARTREE PHARMACY 110 PEARTREE LANE WELWYN GARDEN CITY HERTFORDSHIRE AL7 3UJ BOOTS UK LIMITED 126 PEARTREE LANE WELWYN GARDEN CITY HERTFORDSHIRE AL7 3XY BOOTS UK LIMITED 31 THE HOWARD CENTRE WELWYN GARDEN CITY HERTFORDSHIRE AL8 6HA BOOTS UK LIMITED 47 TOWN CENTRE HATFIELD HERTFORDSHIRE AL10 0LD BOOTS UK LIMITED 2A BRINDLEY PLACE BIRMINGHAM B1 2JB BOOTS UK LIMITED UNIT MSU 10A NEW BULL RING SHOP CTR BIRMINGHAM WEST MIDLANDS B2 4BE BOOTS UK LIMITED 102 NEW STREET BIRMINGHAM WEST MIDLANDS B2 4HQ BOOTS UK LIMITED 66 HIGH STREET BIRMINGHAM WEST MIDLANDS B4 7TA BOOTS UK LIMITED 71 PERSHORE ROAD EDGBASTON BIRMINGHAM WEST MIDLANDS B5 7NX NUCARE HEALTHCARE LTD VICTORIA ROAD MEDICAL CTR 229-233 VICTORIA ROAD ASTON BIRMINGHAM B6 5HP SODHA P 31 REVESBY WALK NECHELLS BIRMINGHAM WEST MIDLANDS B7 4LG J DOCTER LTD BLOOMSBURY VILLAGE CENTRE 67 RUPERT STREET NECHELLS
    [Show full text]