DOCSLIB.ORG

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD—SENATE July 30, 2003

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD—SENATE July 30, 2003 July 30, 2003 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD—SENATE 20139 speaking on behalf of or against judges the investigation which needs to be thinking. I am confident that when the is very important. I say that not only done on this nominee, the Senate Members of the Senate and the public to the Senators but to our majority would be much better informed, the fully understand and consider his prej- leader. It is also very important that American people would be much better udices and attitudes, a majority of the we pass an Energy bill. We have been informed, and the judiciary would be Senate, with the strong support of the waiting for weeks and weeks. This much better served. That is not the de- public, will agree that he does not committee was asked to put a bill to- cision of the leadership and, therefore, merit confirmation to a lifetime seat gether. The Senator from New Mexico we believed that as the day wore on, on an appellate court that often has wants to get the Energy bill finished. after 5, we would at least have an op- the last word on vital issues, not only Clearly, I find nothing in the rules that portunity, since this is an enormously for the 41⁄2 million people of Alabama says the Senator from Massachusetts is serious nominee for a very serious posi- but also for the 8 million people of not entitled to make his speech of 30 tion and there are very serious charges, Georgia and the 15 million people of minutes or up to an hour. I do believe to address the Senate. Florida. In fact, this nomination does it is important, nonetheless, that Mr. SARBANES. Will the Senator not belong on the Senate floor at this somewhere along the line there be yield for a further question? time. some accommodation and that we pro- Mr. KENNEDY. Yes. The Pryor nomination was reported ceed to get the Energy bill finished. I Mr. SARBANES. It is my under- out of the committee as a result of a understand there are four or five standing that twice this week, if I am gross violation of the same committee amendments. I wish I could see them not mistaken, we have had to go off of rule of procedure which caused the sooner or later so I will know what the Energy bill, which we are being Cook and Roberts nominations to be they are about but nobody owes me told we must move forward, in order to held up in the Senate floor earlier this that, either. We will take it as it address other judgeship nominees who year. The Judiciary Committee has a comes. had previously been voted on a number rule which clearly prevents the termi- I will ask the distinguished majority of times. So we have been diverted off nation of debate on a nominee unless a leader to be accommodating so we can the track of the Energy bill by these majority of the committee, including get this bill finished, but I am doing judicial nominees, not of our doing but at least one member of the minority, is that with great trepidation, not as to because of the scheduling which the ready to vote on the nominee. Senator KENNEDY but as to whether other side has undertaken. there is a willingness to pursue this I know our assistant leader has been This rule, Rule 4, was adopted at the bill with vigor if that accommodation concerned about that as well, if I am insistence of Senator HATCH, Senator is made. I am not sure about that based not mistaken, in that regard. Is that Thurmond, and other Republicans in on some things that have been hap- not correct? 1979, when I was chairman of the Judi- pening but I hope it is. It is with that Mr. KENNEDY. The Senator is cor- ciary Committee, as a reasonable pro- in mind that I will talk to the leader, rect. As the Senator remembers, I tection for the minority. After the rule hoping it does mean that if accommo- think those votes were in the late was ignored in the Cook and Roberts dation is made, we will proceed with morning and even interrupted com- case, we thought we had resolved this dispatch on the Energy bill. mittee work at that time, which many matter amicably and equitably. Both I thank the Senator for yielding to of us were involved in, let alone the nominees were later confirmed based me. consideration of the Energy bill. on a clear understanding that Demo- The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Sen- Mr. SARBANES. I thank the Sen- crats would not in the future be de- ator from Massachusetts. ator. prived of their Rule 4 rights. Mr. SARBANES. Will the Senator Mr. KENNEDY. I thank the Senator After all, these rules were put in yield for a question? from Maryland. place at the start of this Congress, Mr. KENNEDY. I will be glad to yield The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Sen- with the support of the Republican for a question. ator from Massachusetts. chairman of the committee, and now Mr. SARBANES. I have been listen- f we have seen a blatant and flagrant ing to this discussion. Am I correct in NOMINATIONS disregard, which is not just an issue of saying that the Senator would not be procedure but affects the substance of seeking to speak now if the other side Mr. KENNEDY. Mr. President, con- this issue in a very important way. had not indicated that they were in- trary to the widespread impression of a Just as important is the reason why tending to try to bring the nomination partisan breakdown in the judicial Democrats were unwilling to vote on of Mr. Pryor to the Senate tomorrow? nomination process, Democrats in this this nomination in the committee. The Is that right? closely divided Senate have, in fact, Mr. KENNEDY. The Senator is ex- tried our best to cooperate with the reporting of this nomination was to- actly correct. President on judicial nominations. We tally premature because the committee Mr. SARBANES. The Senator is not have largely succeeded, even though was forced to move to a vote in the inserting himself into the debate on there are a handful of nominees who we midst of a serious investigation of sub- the Energy bill seeking to slow the En- believe are too extreme. stantive questions of candor and ethics ergy bill down; he is prompted to do Since President Bush’s inauguration, raised at the hearing by the nominee’s this by the fact that the other side is the Senate has confirmed 140 of his own testimony, by his answers and scheduling this nominee for a vote, I nominees and so far blocked only 2. We non-answers to the committee’s fol- understand, with no debate whatso- have said ‘‘no’’ in those cases partly lowup questions. ever. Is that correct? because these few nominees were too On Friday, Chairman HATCH pre- Mr. KENNEDY. Well, that is correct. extreme for lifetime judicial appoint- sented a version of the history of this It is not the members of the Judiciary ments and partly because the White nomination and this investigation Committee who are holding up the con- House and the Senate majority have which does not comport with the facts. sideration of the Energy bill. It is the tried to jam the nominations through I want to go through that history so decision to put before the Senate, the Senate without respect for the Sen- the Senate can fully understand that under the legitimate procedures of the ate’s advice and consent role under the Democrats have proceeded expedi- Senate, a cloture petition to have a Constitution and without respect for tiously and responsibly and that the vote on this nominee, effectively shut- the Senate rules and traditions. rush to judgment in the committee last ting off all the debate. The nomination of Mr. Pryor illus- week was an effort to cut off an impor- Quite clearly, my own belief is if we trates all of these issues. Even his ad- tant investigation. The full Senate de- had the time, and also had the time vocates concede that his attitudes and serves to know its result before it con- during the August recess, to complete beliefs are the very extreme of legal siders this nomination. VerDate Sep 11 2014 07:18 Aug 16, 2019 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00049 Fmt 0686 Sfmt 0634 C:\2003 BOUND RECORD\S30JY3.REC S30JY3 ejoyner on DSK30MW082PROD with BOUND RECORD 20140 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD—SENATE July 30, 2003 The basic facts on this issue are The association’s own materials show the future, to get to the bottom of this, straightforward. Democrats did not in- that its contributions were being given in fairness to the nominee and so that vent the issue. Years before this nomi- to the association and that the writing the Senate will be able to make its nation, lengthy articles in Texas and of checks to an aggregated account of judgment. DC newspapers raised the question of the Republican National Committee Senator HATCH’s floor statement the propriety of the activities of the was merely a way to use a reporting made much of the number of times the Republican Attorneys General Associa- loophole to mask the association’s con- Pryor nomination appeared on the tion. tributions and the amounts of their committee’s agenda. In fact, the Pryor It was reported that the organization gifts. nomination was on the agenda for June sought campaign contributions to sup- Even more startling, Mr.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Jo Ann Gibson Robinson, the Montgomery Bus Boycott and The
    National Humanities Center Resource Toolbox The Making of African American Identity: Vol. III, 1917-1968 Black Belt Press The ONTGOMERY BUS BOYCOTT M and the WOMEN WHO STARTED IT __________________________ The Memoir of Jo Ann Gibson Robinson __________________________ Mrs. Jo Ann Gibson Robinson Black women in Montgomery, Alabama, unlocked a remarkable spirit in their city in late 1955. Sick of segregated public transportation, these women decided to wield their financial power against the city bus system and, led by Jo Ann Gibson Robinson (1912-1992), convinced Montgomery's African Americans to stop using public transportation. Robinson was born in Georgia and attended the segregated schools of Macon. After graduating from Fort Valley State College, she taught school in Macon and eventually went on to earn an M.A. in English at Atlanta University. In 1949 she took a faculty position at Alabama State College in Mont- gomery. There she joined the Women's Political Council. When a Montgomery bus driver insulted her, she vowed to end racial seating on the city's buses. Using her position as president of the Council, she mounted a boycott. She remained active in the civil rights movement in Montgomery until she left that city in 1960. Her story illustrates how the desire on the part of individuals to resist oppression — once *it is organized, led, and aimed at a specific goal — can be transformed into a mass movement. Mrs. T. M. Glass Ch. 2: The Boycott Begins n Friday morning, December 2, 1955, a goodly number of Mont- gomery’s black clergymen happened to be meeting at the Hilliard O Chapel A.
    [Show full text]
  • Martin Luther King Jr.'S Mission and Its Meaning for America and the World
    To the Mountaintop Martin Luther King Jr.’s Mission and Its Meaning for America and the World New Revised and Expanded Edition, 2018 Stewart Burns Cover and Photo Design Deborah Lee Schneer © 2018 by Stewart Burns CreateSpace, Charleston, South Carolina ISBN-13: 978-1985794450 ISBN-10: 1985794454 All Bob Fitch photos courtesy of Bob Fitch Photography Archive, Department of Special Collections, Stanford University Libraries, reproduced with permission Dedication For my dear friend Dorothy F. Cotton (1930-2018), charismatic singer, courageous leader of citizenship education and nonviolent direct action For Reverend Dr. James H. Cone (1936-2018), giant of American theology, architect of Black Liberation Theology, hero and mentor To the memory of the seventeen high school students and staff slain in the Valentine Day massacre, February 2018, in Parkland, Florida, and to their families and friends. And to the memory of all other schoolchildren murdered by American social violence. Also by Stewart Burns Social Movements of the 1960s: Searching for Democracy A People’s Charter: The Pursuit of Rights in America (coauthor) Papers of Martin Luther King Jr., vol 3: Birth of a New Age (lead editor) Daybreak of Freedom: Montgomery Bus Boycott (editor) To the Mountaintop: Martin Luther King Jr.’s Mission to Save America (1955-1968) American Messiah (screenplay) Cosmic Companionship: Spirit Stories by Martin Luther King Jr. (editor) We Will Stand Here Till We Die Contents Moving Forward 9 Book I: Mighty Stream (1955-1959) 15 Book II: Middle Passage (1960-1966) 174 Photo Gallery: MLK and SCLC 1966-1968 376 Book III: Crossing to Jerusalem (1967-1968) 391 Afterword 559 Notes 565 Index 618 Acknowledgments 639 About the Author 642 Rabbi Abraham Joshua Heschel, the preeminent Jewish theologian, introduced Martin Luther King Jr.
    [Show full text]
  • Parks, Rosa (4 Feb
    Parks, Rosa (4 Feb. 1913-24 Oct. 2005), civil rights activist, was born Rosa McCauley in Tuskegee, Alabama, the daughter of James McCauley, a carpenter and stonemason, and Leona Edwards, a schoolteacher. Leona McCauley was a widely respected woman in her community. James McCauley was a native of Abbeville, Alabama. Two years after Rosa's birth, Leona McCauley separated from her husband and returned to her hometown of Pine Level, Alabama. Rosa would see her father just once more before she reached adulthood. From her mother, Rosa learned the value of self-respect, self-love, and honorable behavior toward others. Religion was also at the center of Rosa's world. Soon after her baptism at age two, Rosa became a lifelong member of the African Methodist Episcopal Church. She found much comfort and perspective in biblical study and prayer. Young Rosa received her early education in a rural schoolhouse in Pine Level. Later, at the strong urging of her mother, she attended Montgomery Industrial School for Girls and subsequently completed the tenth and eleventh grades at Alabama State Teachers' College for Negroes. At the end of 1932 nineteen-year-old Rosa married the self-educated Raymond Parks. With his encouragement, Rosa finally earned her high school diploma. An avid reader, Raymond Parks exposed Rosa to civil rights activism as early as 1931, when he began organizing a legal defense fund for the Scottsboro boys, nine young African American males accused of raping two white women on a freight train. Rosa Parks attended some of these meetings with her husband. Parks worked a number of jobs.
    [Show full text]
  • Women in the Modern Civil Rights Movement
    Women in the Modern Civil Rights Movement Introduction Research Questions Who comes to mind when considering the Modern Civil Rights Movement (MCRM) during 1954 - 1965? Is it one of the big three personalities: Martin Luther to Consider King Jr., Malcolm X, or Rosa Parks? Or perhaps it is John Lewis, Stokely Who were some of the women Carmichael, James Baldwin, Thurgood Marshall, Ralph Abernathy, or Medgar leaders of the Modern Civil Evers. What about the names of Septima Poinsette Clark, Ella Baker, Diane Rights Movement in your local town, city or state? Nash, Daisy Bates, Fannie Lou Hamer, Ruby Bridges, or Claudette Colvin? What makes the two groups different? Why might the first group be more familiar than What were the expected gender the latter? A brief look at one of the most visible events during the MCRM, the roles in 1950s - 1960s America? March on Washington, can help shed light on this question. Did these roles vary in different racial and ethnic communities? How would these gender roles On August 28, 1963, over 250,000 men, women, and children of various classes, effect the MCRM? ethnicities, backgrounds, and religions beliefs journeyed to Washington D.C. to march for civil rights. The goals of the March included a push for a Who were the "Big Six" of the comprehensive civil rights bill, ending segregation in public schools, protecting MCRM? What were their voting rights, and protecting employment discrimination. The March produced one individual views toward women of the most iconic speeches of the MCRM, Martin Luther King Jr.’s “I Have a in the movement? Dream" speech, and helped paved the way for the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and How were the ideas of gender the Voting Rights Act of 1965.
    [Show full text]
  • Trump Judges: Even More Extreme Than Reagan and Bush Judges
    Trump Judges: Even More Extreme Than Reagan and Bush Judges September 3, 2020 Executive Summary In June, President Donald Trump pledged to release a new short list of potential Supreme Court nominees by September 1, 2020, for his consideration should he be reelected in November. While Trump has not yet released such a list, it likely would include several people he has already picked for powerful lifetime seats on the federal courts of appeals. Trump appointees' records raise alarms about the extremism they would bring to the highest court in the United States – and the people he would put on the appellate bench if he is reelected to a second term. According to People For the American Way’s ongoing research, these judges (including those likely to be on Trump’s short list), have written or joined more than 100 opinions or dissents as of August 31 that are so far to the right that in nearly one out of every four cases we have reviewed, other Republican-appointed judges, including those on Trump’s previous Supreme Court short lists, have disagreed with them.1 Considering that every Republican president since Ronald Reagan has made a considerable effort to pick very conservative judges, the likelihood that Trump could elevate even more of his extreme judicial picks raises serious concerns. On issues including reproductive rights, voting rights, police violence, gun safety, consumer rights against corporations, and the environment, Trump judges have consistently sided with right-wing special interests over the American people – even measured against other Republican-appointed judges. Many of these cases concern majority rulings issued or joined by Trump judges.
    [Show full text]
  • The Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy Studies 2009 Annual Report
    The Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy Studies 2009 Annual Report “The Courts must declare the sense of the law; and if they should be disposed to exercise will instead of JUDGMENT, the consequences would be the substitution of their pleasure for that of the legislative body.” The Federalist 78 THE FEDERALIST SOCIETY aw schools and the legal profession are currently strongly dominated by a L form of orthodox liberal ideology which advocates a centralized and uniform society. While some members of the academic community have dissented from these views, by and large they are taught simultaneously with (and indeed as if they were) the law. The Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy Studies is a group of conservatives and libertarians interested in the current state of the legal order. It is founded on the principles that the state exists to preserve freedom, that the separation of governmental powers is central to our Constitution, and that it is emphatically the province and duty of the judiciary to say what the law is, not what it should be. The Society seeks both to promote an awareness of these principles and to further their application through its activities. This entails reordering priorities within the legal system to place a premium on individual liberty, traditional values, and the rule of law. It also requires restoring the recognition of the importance of these norms among lawyers, judges, law students and professors. In working to achieve these goals, the Society has created a conservative intellectual network that extends to all levels of the legal community.
    [Show full text]
  • Rebellious Women in the Black Freedom Struggle
    REBELLIOUS WOMEN IN THE BLACK FREEDOM STRUGGLE Monica Maria Tetzlaff Jeanne Theoharis. The Rebellious Life of Mrs. Rosa Parks. Boston: Beacon Press, 2013. xvi + 320 pp. Photographs, notes, and index. $27.95. Barbara Ransby. Eslanda: The Large and Unconventional Life of Mrs. Paul Robeson. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2013. xiii + 373 pp. Photographs, chronol- ogy, notes, bibliography, and index. $35.00. From Montgomery, Alabama, to the United Nations, women activists promoted the black freedom struggle in the mid-twentieth century, and scholarly biog- raphies of their impact have been emerging since around 2000.1 Two recent biographies of Rosa Parks and Eslanda Robeson break new ground in deep- ening our understanding of gender and the “long history” and international scope of the Civil Rights Movement. While it will come as no shock that Eslanda Robeson, activist journalist and anthropologist, was a radical like her husband, Paul Robeson, The Rebellious Life of Mrs. Rosa Parks may surprise some readers. Both women had associa- tions with the Civil Rights Movement led by Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., black nationalism, the peace movement, and the left wing of the union movement. Their biographers, Barbara Ransby and Jeanne Theoharis, are both noted civil rights historians who have argued for the “long civil rights movement” and have placed women at the center, rather than the margins of their analysis. The result is a rich, gendered view of the long civil rights movement and an examination of the way we view black women activists in our culture. Some of the most important analysis in Theoharis’ The Rebellious Life, is her examination of Rosa Parks as a symbol and her critique of that symbolism.
    [Show full text]
  • Ted Cruz Promoted Himself and Conservative Causes As Texas’ Solicito
    FORMER STATE SOLICITORS GENERAL AND OTHER STATE AG OFFICE ATTORNEYS WHO ARE ACTIVE JUDGES by Dan Schweitzer, Director and Chief Counsel, Center for Supreme Court Advocacy, National Association of Attorneys General March 18, 2021 Former State Solicitors General (and Deputy Solicitors General) Federal Courts of Appeals (11) Jeffrey Sutton – Sixth Circuit (Ohio SG) Timothy Tymkovich – Tenth Circuit (Colorado SG) Kevin Newsom – Eleventh Circuit (Alabama SG) Allison Eid – Tenth Circuit (Colorado SG) James Ho – Fifth Circuit (Texas SG) S. Kyle Duncan – Fifth Circuit (Louisiana SG) Andrew Oldham – Fifth Circuit (Texas Deputy SG) Britt Grant – Eleventh Circuit (Georgia SG) Eric Murphy – Sixth Circuit (Ohio SG) Lawrence VanDyke – Ninth Circuit (Montana and Nevada SG) Andrew Brasher – Eleventh Circuit (Alabama SG) State High Courts (6) Stephen McCullough – Virginia Supreme Court Nels Peterson – Georgia Supreme Court Gregory D’Auria – Connecticut Supreme Court John Lopez – Arizona Supreme Court Sarah Warren – Georgia Supreme Court Monica Marquez – Colorado Supreme Court (Deputy SG) State Intermediate Appellate Courts (8) Kent Cattani – Arizona Court of Appeals Karen King Mitchell – Missouri Court of Appeals Kent Wetherell – Florida Court of Appeals (Deputy SG) Scott Makar – Florida Court of Appeals Timothy Osterhaus – Florida Court of Appeals Peter Sacks – Massachusetts Court of Appeals Clyde Wadsworth – Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals Gordon Burns – California Court of Appeal (Deputy SG) Federal District Court (11) Gary Feinerman – Northern
    [Show full text]
  • Bolderboulder 10K Results
    BolderBOULDER 1994 - BolderBOULDER 10K - results OnlineRaceResults.com NAME DIV TIME ---------------------- ------- ----------- Matthew Lavigne 22 John Mirth M32 31:11 Jonathan Heese M36 31:37 Matt Schubert M24 31:58 Glen Mays M24 31:59 Brett Burt M28 32:07 Rodolfo Gomez M43 32:16 Chris Prior M34 32:21 Scott Kent M27 32:27 Darrin Rohr M29 32:30 Steve Roch M30 32:43 Rob Welo M30 32:43 John Ingram M22 32:44 John Pendergraft M27 32:45 Gerard Ostheimer M25 32:52 Mark Allen M36 32:56 Chris Severy M17 33:08 Andy Ames M31 33:09 Daniel King M34 33:10 Ignacio Morales M42 33:11 Richard Bishop M36 33:12 Brendan Reilly M34 33:16 Aaron Salomon M18 33:17 Dave Nelson M32 33:18 Rick Ames M33 33:26 Dennis Lima M32 33:33 Michael McCarrick M28 33:38 Michael Trunkes M31 33:43 Joe Sheely M35 33:44 Wilbur Ferdinand M32 33:47 Ricardo Rojas M42 33:50 Jeff Rosenow M37 33:52 Robert Love M30 33:54 Chris Borton M18 33:56 Marc Reider M27 34:01 Jason Porter M24 34:03 Sean Coster M18 34:04 Jon Schoenberg M31 34:05 Troy Pickett M31 34:06 Joe Wilson M18 34:07 Michael Sandrock M36 34:08 James Johnson M25 34:09 Bern Gever M34 34:11 Kevin Hilton M22 34:13 Chris Harrison M30 34:15 Lee Stringer M26 34:17 Douglas Hugill M33 34:20 Dominic Wyzomirski M34 34:22 Edward Boggess M36 34:23 John Wiberg M26 34:25 Andrew Crook M35 34:26 Chris Rodriguez M25 34:27 Allan Kupczak M33 34:28 Alex Furman M16 34:29 Daniel Hanewall M32 34:30 Mohamed Hajoui M32 34:32 Zeke Tiernan M18 34:33 Jason Nicholas M24 34:34 Jerry Duckworth M32 34:35 Parrick Aris M37 34:36 Thom Richman M39 34:37 Todd Reeser
    [Show full text]
  • Jeanne Theoharis a Life History of Being Rebellious
    Want to Start a Revolution? Gore, Dayo, Theoharis, Jeanne, Woodard, Komozi Published by NYU Press Gore, Dayo & Theoharis, Jeanne & Woodard, Komozi. Want to Start a Revolution? Radical Women in the Black Freedom Struggle. New York: NYU Press, 2009. Project MUSE., https://muse.jhu.edu/. For additional information about this book https://muse.jhu.edu/book/10942 Access provided by The College Of Wooster (14 Jan 2019 17:21 GMT) 5 “A Life History of Being Rebellious” The Radicalism of Rosa Parks Jeanne Theoharis In all these years . it’s strange . but maybe not . nobody asks . about my life . if I have children . why I moved to Detroit . what I think . about what we tried . to do. Something needs to be said . about Rosa Parks . other than her feet . were tired. Lots of people . on that bus . and many before . and since . had tired feet . lots of people . still do . they just don’t know . where to plant them. Nikki Giovanni, “Harvest for Rosa Parks”1 On October 30, 2005, Rosa Parks became the first woman and second African American to lie in state in the U.S. Capitol. Forty thou- sand Americans—including President and Mrs. Bush—came to pay their respects. Thousands more packed her seven-hour funeral celebration at the Greater Grace Temple of Detroit and waited outside to see a horse- drawn carriage carry Mrs. Parks’s coffin to the cemetery.2 Yet what is com- monly known—and much of what was widely eulogized—about Parks is a troubling distortion of what actually makes her fitting for such a national tribute.
    [Show full text]
  • Senate Section (PDF929KB)
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 109 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 151 WASHINGTON, THURSDAY, MAY 19, 2005 No. 67 Senate The Senate met at 9:30 a.m. and was ceed to executive session for the con- Yesterday, 21 Senators—evenly di- called to order by the President pro sideration of calendar No. 71, which the vided, I believe 11 Republicans and 10 tempore (Mr. STEVENS). clerk will report. Democrats—debated for over 10 hours The legislative clerk read the nomi- on the nomination of Priscilla Owen. PRAYER nation of Priscilla Richman Owen, of We will continue that debate—10 hours The Chaplain, Dr. Barry C. Black, of- Texas, to be United States Circuit yesterday—maybe 20 hours, maybe 30 fered the following prayer: Judge for the Fifth Circuit. hours, and we will take as long as it Let us pray. RECOGNITION OF THE MAJORITY LEADER takes for Senators to express their God of grace and glory, open our eyes The PRESIDENT pro tempore. The views on this qualified nominee. to the power You provide for all of our majority leader is recognized. But at some point that debate should challenges. Give us a glimpse of Your SCHEDULE end and there should be a vote. It ability to do what seems impossible, to Mr. FRIST. Mr. President, today we makes sense: up or down, ‘‘yes’’ or exceed what we can request or imagine. will resume executive session to con- ‘‘no,’’ confirm or reject; and then we Encourage us again with Your promise sider Priscilla Owen to be a U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Case No. 09-2473 in the United States Court of Appeals
    Case: 09-2473 Document: 00116058015 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/05/2010 Entry ID: 5443428 CASE NO. 09-2473 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT FREEDOM FROM RELIGION FOUNDATION, et al. Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. HANOVER SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al. Defendants-Appellees, On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire (District Court #1:07-cv-356) APPELLANTS’ REPLY BRIEF MICHAEL NEWDOW ROSANNA FOX Counsel for Plaintiffs Counsel for Plaintiffs PO BOX 233345 12 ELDORADO CIRCLE SACRAMENTO, CA 95823 NASHUA, NH 03062 (916) 424-2356 (603) 318-8479 [email protected] [email protected] Case: 09-2473 Document: 00116058015 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/05/2010 Entry ID: 5443428 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ........................................................................... iii INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................1 ARGUMENT.......................................................................................................3 I. “God” means “God” ...........................................................................4 II. The “Power, Prestige and Financial Support of Government” Has Real Consequences............................................14 III. The Organizations Which Have Involved Themselves in this Case Demonstrate that the Case is About (Christian) Monotheism........................................................................................15 IV. Congress’ 2002 Reaffirmation of the Pledge was a Sham
    [Show full text]