DOCSLIB.ORG

Office of the Controller of Budget

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Office of the Controller of Budget REPUBLIC OF KENYA OFFICE OF THE CONTROLLER OF BUDGET ANNUAL COUNTY GOVERNMENTS BUDGET IMPLEMENTATION REVIEW REPORT FY 2015/16 Bima House, 12th Floor Harambee Avenue P. O. Box 35616 - 00100 Nairobi, Kenya Tel: +254 (0) 20 318939, 2211056 SEPTEMBER, 2016 Fax: +254 (0) 20 2211920 Email: [email protected] Website: www.cob.go.ke ANNUAL COUNTY GOVERNMENTS BUDGET IMPLEMENTATION REVIEW REPORT FY 2015/16 i ANNUAL COUNTY GOVERNMENTS BUDGET IMPLEMENTATION REVIEW REPORT ii FY 2015/16 REPUBLIC OF KENYA OFFICE OF THE CONTROLLER OF BUDGET ANNUAL COUNTY GOVERNMENTS BUDGET IMPLEMENTATION REVIEW REPORT FY 2015/16 September, 2016 ANNUAL COUNTY GOVERNMENTS BUDGET IMPLEMENTATION REVIEW REPORT FY 2015/16 i PREFACE It is my pleasure to present the Annual County Governments Budget Implementation Review Report for FY 2015/16. The report presents information on the budget implementation and has been prepared in line with the requirements of Article 228 (6) of the Constitution of Kenya 2010, which requires the Controller of Budget (COB) to submit to each House of Parliament a report on the implementation of the budgets of both the National and County Governments every four months. This report examines budget performance by the forty seven counties for the period July, 2015 to June, 2016. It is based on analysis of financial reports submitted to the Controller of Budget by the County Treasuries, the Approved County Budgets, and reports generated from the Integrated Financial Management Information System (IFMIS). The report highlights the achievements and challenges encountered in budget implementation and suggests recommendations to improve budget implementation. Successful production of this report was made possible through dedication of staff of both the County Governments and the Office of the Controller of Budget (OCOB). I am therefore, grateful to these members of staff for their commitment and dedication in the production of this report. The information contained in this report is useful to Parliament and the public at large in tracking budget implementation. It is also useful in monitoring budget implementation by the County governments. I therefore, call for the involvement of all stakeholders in budget implementation in order to promote efficient and effective management of public finances in the Country. Mrs. Agnes Odhiambo Controller of Budget ANNUAL COUNTY GOVERNMENTS BUDGET IMPLEMENTATION REVIEW REPORT ii FY 2015/16 TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE ................................................................................................................................................................................................................ii ACRONYMS .............................................................................................................................................................................................................xiv LIST OF FIGURES .............................................................................................................................................................................................................. v LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................................................................................................................ x EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................................................................................... xv KEY HIGHLIGHTS ........................................................................................................................................................................................................xvii 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 FINANCIAL ANALYSIS OF COUNTY BUDGET IMPLEMENTATION IN FY 2015/16 .......................................................................... 2 2.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 2 2.2 Revenue Analysis ..................................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 2.3 Locally Collected Revenue ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 2.4 Funds Released to the Counties ............................................................................................................................................................................. 5 2.5 Expenditure Analysis .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 7 2.6 Pending Bills as of 30th June, 2016 ......................................................................................................................................................................15 3.0 INDIVIDUAL COUNTY BUDGET PERFORMANCE ..................................................................................................................................18 3.1 Baringo County ......................................................................................................................................................................................................18 3.2 Bomet County ........................................................................................................................................................................................................24 3.3 Bungoma County ...................................................................................................................................................................................................31 3.4 Busia County ..........................................................................................................................................................................................................37 3.5 Elgeyo Marakwet County .....................................................................................................................................................................................43 3.6 Embu County .........................................................................................................................................................................................................49 3.7 Garissa County .......................................................................................................................................................................................................55 3.8 Homa Bay County .................................................................................................................................................................................................61 3.9 Isiolo County ..........................................................................................................................................................................................................68 3.10 Kajiado County ......................................................................................................................................................................................................74 3.11 Kakamega County .................................................................................................................................................................................................80 3.12 Kericho County ......................................................................................................................................................................................................87 3.13 Kiambu County ......................................................................................................................................................................................................93 3.14 Kilifi County ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................99 3.15 Kirinyaga County .................................................................................................................................................................................................105 3.16 Kisii County ..........................................................................................................................................................................................................112 3.17 Kisumu County ....................................................................................................................................................................................................119 3.18 Kitui County .........................................................................................................................................................................................................126 3.19 Kwale County .......................................................................................................................................................................................................132
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Water Infrastructure Audit of Kitui County
    Research Report Research Report Sustainable WASH Systems Learning Partnership A WATER INFRASTRUCTURE AUDIT OF KITUI COUNTY Cliff Nyaga, University of Oxford January 2019 PHOTO CREDIT:PHOTO CLIFF NYAGA/UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD Prepared by: Cliff Nyaga, University of Oxford Reviewed by: Mike Thomas, Rural Focus; Eduardo Perez, Global Communities; Karl Linden, University of Colorado Boulder (UCB); and Pranav Chintalapati, UCB. Acknowledgements: The Kitui County Government would like to acknowledge the financial support received from the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). Further, the Kitui County Government appreciates its longstanding partnership with the University of Oxford and UNICEF Kenya through various collaborating programs, including the DFID-funded REACH Program. The leadership received from Emmanuel Kisangau, Kennedy Mutati, Philip Nzula, Augustus Ndingo, and Hope Sila — all from the County Ministry for Water Agriculture and Livestock Development — throughout the audit exercise is appreciated. The sub-county water officers were instrumental in logistics planning and in providing liaison between the field audit teams, communities, and County Ministries for Agriculture, Water, and Livestock Development and Administration and Coordination. A team of local enumerators led field data collection: Lucy Mweti, Grace Muisyo, Abigael Kyenze, Patrick Mulwa, Lydia Mwikali, Muimi Kivoko, Philip Muthengi, Mary Sammy, Ruth Mwende, Peter Musili, Annah Kavata, James Kimanzi, Purity Maingi, Felix Muthui, and Assumpta Mwikali. The technical advice and guidance received from Professor Rob Hope of the University of Oxford and Dr. Andrew Trevett of UNICEF Kenya throughout the planning, data collection, analysis, and preparation of this report is very much appreciated. Front cover: This Katanu Hand pump was developed in the late 1990s by the Government of Kenya and is the main water source for Nzamba Village in Ikutha Ward, Kitui.
    [Show full text]
  • Internal Ex-Post Evaluation for Grant Aid Project the Project for The
    Internal Ex-Post Evaluation for Grant Aid Project conducted by Kenya Office: March 2018 Country Name The Project for the Reinforcement of Vaccine Storage in Kenya The Republic of Kenya I. Project Outline In Kenya, provision of medical service focusing more on prevention was a key issue to improve the situation under which many people have suffered from preventable diseases and more expenses for their treatments were required. In particular, according to the WHO mortality country fact sheet 2006, the main causes of death for children under 5 years were pneumonia (20%), diarrhea (16%) and measles (3%) which were diseases Background preventable by immunization. Therefore, the government of Kenya had been implementing vaccination under “the Kenya Expanded Programme on Immunization” (KEPI) since 1980. However, there was insufficient storage capacity for vaccines and transportation of vaccines from the National Vaccine Depot to the Regional Vaccine Depots was not smoothly carried out, which hampered efficient immunization services. To enable more efficient stock management and delivery of vaccines by construction of the Central and Objectives of the Regional Vaccine Depots and procurement of equipment for adequate storage of vaccines, thereby contributing to Project improvement for the full immunization coverage in Kenya 1. Project Site: Nairobi (later moved to Kitengela), Kakamega (Western Province), Meru (Eastern Province), Garissa (North Eastern Province), Nyeri (Central Province), Nakuru, Eldoret (Rift Valley Province), Kisumu (Nyanza Province), Mombasa (Coast Province)1. 2. Japanese side Consultant services: Design of facilities, equipment, and supervision of construction Construction: Nairobi Central Vaccine Depot, Kakamega Regional Vaccine Depot, Meru Regional Contents of the Project Vaccine Depot, and Garissa Regional Vaccine Depot Equipment: Cold rooms, freezer rooms, freezer, pallet lifts, tool boxes etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Cholera Outbreak Has Affected 7 Counties: Nairobi, Migori, Homa Bay, Bomet, Mombasa, Nakuru and Muranga Counties
    MINISTRY OF HEALTH CHOLERA SITUATION REPORT IN KENYA AS AT 5TH MAY 2015 Weekly Situation Summary Since 26th December 2014, Cholera outbreak has affected 7 counties: Nairobi, Migori, Homa Bay, Bomet, Mombasa, Nakuru and Muranga Counties. Migori, Homabay and Bomet Cholera outbreaks are now considered successfully controlled The outbreak first started in Nairobi County on 26th December 2014. Later the outbreak was reported in Migori County on 30th January 2015, Homa Bay County on 2nd February 2015, Bomet County on 12th March 2015, Mombasa County on 6th April 2015, Nakuru 8th April and Muranga county on 18th April 2015. As of 5th May 2015, a total of 2156 cases and 42 deaths (CFR=1.9%) had been reported nationally distributed as follows: Nairobi 145 cases, 5 deaths (CFR 3.4%); Migori 915 cases, 12 deaths (CFR 1.3%); Homa Bay 377 cases, 5 deaths (CFR 1.4%) , Bomet 272 cases, 2 deaths (CFR 1.5%) ,Mombasa 69 cases, 5 deaths (CFR 7.2%), Muranga 278 cases, 1 death (0.4%), and Nakuru 100 cases, 12 deaths (CFR 12%) Cumulatively, 274 new cases were reported in the last one week (164 in Muranga, 73 in Nakuru, 17 in Mombasa and 20 in Nairobi). This is an increase from the previous week where 35 new cases were reported. 6 new deaths were reported in the last one week (5 in Nakuru and 1 in Nairobi). There are 34 current admissions in Mombasa, Nakuru and Nairobi Counties. 1 | Page New cases reported in Nairobi were detected in new epicentres- Kibera, Mukuru Kayiaba and Mukuru Kwa Njenga slums.
    [Show full text]
  • Livestock Herd Structures and Dynamics in Garissa County, Kenya Patrick Mwambi Mwanyumba1*, Raphael Wahome Wahome2, Laban Macopiyo3 and Paul Kanyari4
    Mwanyumba et al. Pastoralism: Research, Policy and Practice (2015) 5:26 DOI 10.1186/s13570-015-0045-6 SHORT REPORT Open Access Livestock herd structures and dynamics in Garissa County, Kenya Patrick Mwambi Mwanyumba1*, Raphael Wahome Wahome2, Laban MacOpiyo3 and Paul Kanyari4 Abstract In Kenya’s Northeastern Province, pastoralism is the main livestock production system and means of livelihood. However, pastoralists are facing increasing risks such as drought, insecurity, animal diseases, increasing human populations and land fragmentation. This study sought to evaluate household livestock herd structures and dynamics in view of such risks and subsistence and market demands. The study was conducted in Garissa County of Kenya, using a cross-sectional household survey. The data was analysed for descriptive statistics of household livestock status, dynamics and demographic parameters. The results showed that females of reproductive age formed over 50 % of all livestock species. Cattle had the highest turnover and all species’ mortalities accounted for the greater proportion of exits. Cattle had the highest multiplication and growth rates, but also the highest mortality, offtake, commercial offtake and intake rates. Goats had the lowest mortalities, offtake, commercial offtake and intake rates. Overall, the herds were structured to provide for both immediate and future needs in terms of milk, sales and herd replacement as well as for rapid recovery after disasters. The livestock herd dynamics indicate efforts at culling, restocking, retention of valuable categories of animals, and natural events. Livestock populations would be annihilated over time if the trends in end balances and negative growth rates were to continue and not be interrupted by the upward phases of the livestock cycles.
    [Show full text]
  • Kenya Country Office
    Kenya Country Office Flood Situation Report Report # 1: 24 November 2019 Highlights Situation in Numbers The National Disaster Operations Center (NDOC) estimates that at least 330,000 330,000 people are affected - 18,000 people have been displaced and 120 people affected people have died due to floods and landslides. (NDOC-24/11/2019) A total of 6,821 children have been reached through integrated outreach 31 services and 856 people have received cholera treatment through UNICEF-supported treatment centres. counties affected by flooding (NDOC-24/11/2019) A total of 270 households in Turkana County (out of 400 targeted) and 110 households in Wajir county have received UNICEF family emergency kits 120 (including 20-litre and 10-litre bucket), soap and water treatment tablets people killed from flooding through partnership with the Kenya Red Cross. (NDOC-24/11/2019) UNICEF has reached 55,000 people with WASH supplies consisting of 20- litre jerrycans, 10-litre buckets and multipurpose bar soap. 18,000 UNICEF has completed solarization of two boreholes reaching people displaced approximately 20,500 people with access to safe water in Garissa County. (NDOC-24/11/2019) Situation Overview & Humanitarian Needs Kenya has continued to experience enhanced rainfall resulting in flooding since mid-October, negatively impacting the lives and livelihoods of vulnerable populations. According to the National Disaster Operations Center (NDOC) 24 November 2019 updates, major roads have been cut off in 11 counties, affecting accessibility to affected populations for rapid assessments and delivery of humanitarian assistance, especially in parts of West Pokot, Marsabit, Mandera, Turkana, Garissa, Lamu, Mombasa, Tana River, Taita Taveta, Kwale and Wajir Counties.
    [Show full text]
  • County Urban Governance Tools
    County Urban Governance Tools This map shows various governance and management approaches counties are using in urban areas Mandera P Turkana Marsabit P West Pokot Wajir ish Elgeyo Samburu Marakwet Busia Trans Nzoia P P Isiolo P tax Bungoma LUFs P Busia Kakamega Baringo Kakamega Uasin P Gishu LUFs Nandi Laikipia Siaya tax P P P Vihiga Meru P Kisumu ga P Nakuru P LUFs LUFs Nyandarua Tharaka Garissa Kericho LUFs Nithi LUFs Nyeri Kirinyaga LUFs Homa Bay Nyamira P Kisii P Muranga Bomet Embu Migori LUFs P Kiambu Nairobi P Narok LUFs P LUFs Kitui Machakos Kisii Tana River Nyamira Makueni Lamu Nairobi P LUFs tax P Kajiado KEY County Budget and Economic Forums (CBEFs) They are meant to serve as the primary institution for ensuring public participation in public finances in order to im- Mom- prove accountability and public participation at the county level. basa Baringo County, Bomet County, Bungoma County, Busia County,Embu County, Elgeyo/ Marakwet County, Homabay County, Kajiado County, Kakamega County, Kericho Count, Kiambu County, Kilifi County, Kirin- yaga County, Kisii County, Kisumu County, Kitui County, Kwale County, Laikipia County, Machakos Coun- LUFs ty, Makueni County, Meru County, Mombasa County, Murang’a County, Nairobi County, Nakuru County, Kilifi Nandi County, Nyandarua County, Nyeri County, Samburu County, Siaya County, TaitaTaveta County, Taita Taveta TharakaNithi County, Trans Nzoia County, Uasin Gishu County Youth Empowerment Programs in urban areas In collaboration with the national government, county governments unveiled
    [Show full text]
  • Facilitator's Training Manual
    Department of Children's Services Facilitator’s Training Manual Implementing the Guidelines for the Alternative Family Care of Children in Kenya (2014) July 2019 This report was supported in part by Changing the Way We CareSM, a consortium of Catholic Relief Services, the Lumos Foundation, and Maestral International. Changing the Way We Care works in collaboration with donors, including the MacArthur Foundation, USAID, GHR Foundation and individuals. For more information, contact [email protected]. © 2020 This material may not be modified without the express prior written permission of the copyright holder. For permission, contact the Department of Children’s Services: P. O Box 40326- 00100 or 16936-00100, Nairobi Phone +254 (0)2729800-4, Fax +254 (0)2726222. FOREWORD The Government of Kenya’s commitment to provide for children out of family care is demonstrated by the various policies and legislative frameworks that have been developed in the recent years. All children are equal rights-holders and deserve to be within families and community as enshrined in the Constitution of Kenya 2010 and the Children Act 2001. The development of this training manual recognizes the role of the family and the community in the care of our children while the accompanying user friendly handbook aims to boost the skills and knowledge of case workers and practioners in the child protection sector. All efforts need to be made to support families to continue to care for their children and, if this is not possible, to place a child in a family-based alternative care arrangement, such as; kinship care, foster care, guardianship, Kafaalah, Supported Independent Living (SIL), or adoption.
    [Show full text]
  • Territoires Supprimés De La Liste Des Territoires Infectés Entre Les 31 Mars
    — 168 NÉPAL — NEPAL (excl. Hyderabad, Division TYPHUS À POUXt Conor, Province Biratnagar (A) & Kat­ Hyderabad, District. B 28.1 LOUSE-BORNE TYPHUS FEVER f Canar, Canton................ B 24.X11 mandu ( A » ................ B 21.1 Hyderabad, D. : Hyder­ Biratnagar ( A ) ................ B 21.1 Carchi, Province abad ........................... B 11.11 5JO-6.IV Katmandu ( A ) ................ ■ 22.V.63 Tharparkar, District . B 4.11 Tulcan, Canton .... B 21.1 Khairpur, Division Afrique — Africa Chimborazo, Province PAKISTAN Jacobabad, District . B 25.11 Alausi, C anton.................. B 7.1 Khairpur, District . A 11.III AFRIQUE DU SUD1 Chaîna (P )....................... B 4.IU Nawabshah, District. B 21.1 SOUTH AFRICA1 Dacca (excl. A) .... A 25.111 XSukkur, District .... B 7.1 PÉROU — PERU Karachi (PA) (excl. A) . A 25.111 Cape, Province Lahore (excl. A) . A 25.111 Lahore, Division Ârequipa, Dep, LyaJIpur ( A ) ................... B 10.XII Gujranwala, District. B 21.1 Glen Grey, District . B 30.TV.65 Arequipa, Province . B 28.1 Multan ( A ) ................... B 31.XII Gujranwala, D.: 1 Aucune information reçue depuis le/ Peshawar ( A ) .....................A 25JH G ujranw ala......... B 21.1 No information received since: 7.VI.65. Quetta (A )............................ A 11.III Lahore, District.......... A 11.01 Asie — Asia Sargodha ( A ) ................ B 4.HI Sheikhupura, District . B 21.1 Sialkot, District .... B 24.XU BURUNDI YEMEN East Pakistan Sialkot, D. : Sialkot . B 31.XII Muramvya, Province Sana, Province (excl. Chittagong, Division Multan, Division Muramvya, Air. .... B 25.0 Sana (A ))...................... B 9.X.63 Commilla (Tippera), D. B 21.1 MuzafFargarh, District B 10.XIÏ Mwaro, Ait. ................... B 4.10 Noakhali, District .
    [Show full text]
  • Downloads/Pubdocs/Isiolo-Conflict-Analysis.Pdf
    BUILDING LIVELIHOOD RESILIENCE IN SEMI-ARID KENYA: WHAT ROLE DOES AGROFORESTRY PLAY? by AMY KATHRYN QUANDT B.S., University of Puget Sound, 2005 M.S., University of Montana Missoula, 2010 A thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Colorado in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Environmental Studies Program 2017 This thesis entitled: Building livelihood resilience in semi-arid Kenya: what role does agroforestry play? written by Amy Kathryn Quandt has been approved for the Environmental Studies Program _____________________________________ Dr. J. Terrence McCabe _____________________________________ Dr. Maxwell Boykoff _____________________________________ Dr. Lisa Dilling _____________________________________ Dr. Joel Hartter _____________________________________ Dr. Myles Osborne Date__________________ The final copy of this thesis has been examined by the signatories, and we find that both the content and the form meet acceptable presentation standards of scholarly work in the above mentioned discipline. IRB protocol # 14-0059 ii ABSTRACT Quandt, Amy Kathryn (Ph.D., Environmental Studies) Building livelihood resilience in semi-arid Kenya: what role does agroforestry play? Thesis directed by Professor J. Terrence McCabe Livelihoods must adapt to global and local changes in order to maintain livelihood resilience. Agroforestry is one potential livelihood activity which can help farmers adapt to changes and shocks. This dissertation explores if and how agroforestry is building livelihood resilience in the face of environmental and socio-economic shocks in Isiolo County, Kenya. Drawing from resilience thinking and political ecology, this research focused on general livelihood resilience, along with livelihood resilience to floods, droughts, violent conflict, and wildlife crop raiding. Field work was conducted in 2014-2015 in the communities of Burat and Kinna.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards Sustainable Charcoal Production and Trade in Kitui County Phosiso Sola1, Mieke Bourne1, Mary Njenga1, Anthony Kitema2, Siko Ignatius1 and Grace Koech1
    CIFOR infobriefs provide concise, accurate, peer- reviewed information on current topics in forest research No. 297, September 2020 DOI: 10.17528/cifor/007721 | cifor.org Towards sustainable charcoal production and trade in Kitui County Phosiso Sola1, Mieke Bourne1, Mary Njenga1, Anthony Kitema2, Siko Ignatius1 and Grace Koech1 Key messages • Woodfuel, particularly charcoal, is an important livelihood source in Kitui County, with consumption largely in urban areas within and beyond the county, where it is still a critical energy source. • While charcoal movement out of the county has been banned since 2018, trade has continued in some form because of inadequate support, guidance and regulation. • While briquette production has been promoted, it has not seen substantial demand. • Because charcoal production has continued, a sustainable charcoal value chain in Kitui County has to be explored, including i) management of woodlands and sustainable harvesting of trees, e.g. through natural regeneration and enrichment planting of trees on degraded private and public lands; ii) promotion of efficient processing and carbonization; and iii) efficient and clean cooking. • Current institutional arrangements for guiding, supporting and controlling the value chain activities and actors can be improved to enhance the sustainability, enforcement, compliance, capacity and competitiveness of local value chains. • World Agroforestry (ICRAF), Adventist Development Relief Agency (ADRA) and partners undertook a number of activities in Kitui County and more widely in Kenya as a whole to generate evidence, knowledge and policy options, and to facilitate engagement for more sustainable woodfuel value chains under the project entitled Governing Multifunctional Landscapes (GML) in sub-Saharan Africa launched in 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Squeac Report Laikipia County, Kenya Kenneedy Musumba, December 2012
    SQUEAC REPORT LAIKIPIA COUNTY, KENYA LAIKIPIA KENNEEDY COUNTY, MUSUMBA, KENYA DECEMBER 2012 KENNEEDY MUSUMBA, DECEMBER 2012 i ACKNOWLEDGEMENT International Medical Corps is appreciative to all the parties for their contribution, both known and unknown and for the profound support during the entire coverage assessment. The objectives of SQUEAC assessment would not have been achieved without the active participation of different actors who included: . UNICEF for financial support . CMN for technical support . DHMT Laikipia County for active involvement in data collection . IMC field staff for data collection and logistics support . Community leaders who facilitated data collection during the wide area survey. Special thanks due for IMC Nutrition Department and all Kenyan SQUEAC experts for their extensive and technical support, and all the reviewers of this document in its draft form for the invaluable input. ii ACRONYMS CMAM- Community based Management of Acute Malnutrition CMN- Coverage Monitoring Network DHMT- District Health Management Team GFD-General Food Distribution HCPs-Health Care Provider HINI- High Impact Nutrition Interventions IMAM-Integrated Management of Acute Malnutrition MOPHS-Ministry of Public Health and Sanitation MOMS-Ministry of Medical Services MoH-Ministry of Health OJT- On Job Training OTP-Outpatient Therapeutic Program PLW-Pregnant and Lactating Women RUTF-Ready to Use Therapeutic Food SFP-Supplementary Feeding Program TBAs- Traditional Birth Attendants THPs-Traditional Health Practitioners URTI- Upper Respiratory
    [Show full text]
  • Download List of Physical Locations of Constituency Offices
    INDEPENDENT ELECTORAL AND BOUNDARIES COMMISSION PHYSICAL LOCATIONS OF CONSTITUENCY OFFICES IN KENYA County Constituency Constituency Name Office Location Most Conspicuous Landmark Estimated Distance From The Land Code Mark To Constituency Office Mombasa 001 Changamwe Changamwe At The Fire Station Changamwe Fire Station Mombasa 002 Jomvu Mkindani At The Ap Post Mkindani Ap Post Mombasa 003 Kisauni Along Dr. Felix Mandi Avenue,Behind The District H/Q Kisauni, District H/Q Bamburi Mtamboni. Mombasa 004 Nyali Links Road West Bank Villa Mamba Village Mombasa 005 Likoni Likoni School For The Blind Likoni Police Station Mombasa 006 Mvita Baluchi Complex Central Ploice Station Kwale 007 Msambweni Msambweni Youth Office Kwale 008 Lunga Lunga Opposite Lunga Lunga Matatu Stage On The Main Road To Tanzania Lunga Lunga Petrol Station Kwale 009 Matuga Opposite Kwale County Government Office Ministry Of Finance Office Kwale County Kwale 010 Kinango Kinango Town,Next To Ministry Of Lands 1st Floor,At Junction Off- Kinango Town,Next To Ministry Of Lands 1st Kinango Ndavaya Road Floor,At Junction Off-Kinango Ndavaya Road Kilifi 011 Kilifi North Next To County Commissioners Office Kilifi Bridge 500m Kilifi 012 Kilifi South Opposite Co-Operative Bank Mtwapa Police Station 1 Km Kilifi 013 Kaloleni Opposite St John Ack Church St. Johns Ack Church 100m Kilifi 014 Rabai Rabai District Hqs Kombeni Girls Sec School 500 M (0.5 Km) Kilifi 015 Ganze Ganze Commissioners Sub County Office Ganze 500m Kilifi 016 Malindi Opposite Malindi Law Court Malindi Law Court 30m Kilifi 017 Magarini Near Mwembe Resort Catholic Institute 300m Tana River 018 Garsen Garsen Behind Methodist Church Methodist Church 100m Tana River 019 Galole Hola Town Tana River 1 Km Tana River 020 Bura Bura Irrigation Scheme Bura Irrigation Scheme Lamu 021 Lamu East Faza Town Registration Of Persons Office 100 Metres Lamu 022 Lamu West Mokowe Cooperative Building Police Post 100 M.
    [Show full text]