Ineke Van Der Valk Is a Researcher with a Broad Background in the Social Sciences and Discourse Studies, and Who Specialises in Ethnic Diversity, Racism and Extremism

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ineke Van Der Valk Is a Researcher with a Broad Background in the Social Sciences and Discourse Studies, and Who Specialises in Ethnic Diversity, Racism and Extremism 1 SINCE 11 SEPTEMBER 2001 – and especially since the murder of Theo van Gogh – Muslims and Islam have frequently been Islamo unfavourably portrayed at the heart of public debate. Manifestations of Islamophobia can be found on the Internet, in comments by the PVV, and in acts of violence committed against mosques. Dutch anti-discrimination policies are coming under pressure now that this ideology has forced its way to the centre of the political stage. How do negative connotations about Muslims come about? Where are the acts of violence taking place? fobia in Is the Netherlands the front line in the ‘clash of civilisations’, as has been claimed by politicians, opinion formers and others in the international arena? Or is it all about an exclusion mechanism? The author states that shifts in the political climate can only be fully understood if racism, ideol- ogy, and language are involved in the analysis. Her research for Islamo- phobia and Discrimination consisted of a study of relevant literature, an the neth analysis of documents, and the gathering of data on the various methods people use to express their views. Ineke van der Valk is a researcher with a broad background in the social sciences and discourse studies, and who specialises in ethnic diversity, racism and extremism. erlands This book is about an issue that is very important for the Netherlands but about which remarkably little has been investigated or written. It offers an overview of theory formation about Islamophobia that is as thorough as it is accessible, and an overview of the actual situation in the Netherlands Ineke van der Valk that is as up to date as it is complete. — Frank Bovenkerk, FORUM Frank J. Buijs Chair of Radicalisation Studies, With a foreword by IMES/University of Amsterdam Ernst Hirsch Ballin This publication was written with the support of the Euro-Mediterranean Centre for Migration and Development (EMCEMO). 2 ISLAMOPHOBIA IN THE NETHERLANDS 3 Islamophobia in the Netherlands • • • • • • • • • • • • Ineke van der Valk With a foreword by Ernst Hirsch Ballin 4 ISLAMOPHOBIA IN THE NETHERLANDS This publication is supported by the Euro-Mediterranean Centre for Migration and Development and in part by a grant from the Council of Moroccan Communities Abroad (CCME). It is also available in Dutch (Islamofobie en Discriminatie, Pallas Publications Amsterdam University Press 2012) and French (Islamophobie aux Pays-Bas). The translation from Dutch to English is supported by a grant from the At Home in Europe Project of the Open Society Foundations. Cover design: Maedium, Utrecht © Ineke van der Valk All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, transmitted or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without permission in writing from the Author (www.inekevandervalk.com). 5 Contents Foreword . 7 Ernst Hirsch Ballin 1 Introduction . 10 2 What is Islamophobia? . 15 2.1 Examination of the term . 16 2.2 Racism . 19 2.3 Stigmatisation . 21 2.4 Prejudices . 22 2.5 Motives and political exploitation . 23 2.6 Ideology . 25 2.7 In conclusion . 27 3 Public and political statements . 28 3.1 Islamophobia on the Internet . 29 3.1.1 Notifications . 30 3.1.2 Sites and forums . 32 3.1.3 Themes . 35 3.2 The PVV and Islamophobia . 41 3.3 The extreme right and Islamophobia . 48 3.3.1 Extreme right-wing . 49 3.3.2 Views on Islam /Muslims . 51 3.4 In conclusion . 58 4 Acts of violence against mosques . 60 4.1 In the Western world . 60 4.2 The Netherlands, 2005-2010 . 61 4.3 In conclusion . 68 5 Legal protests against mosques . 69 5.1 In the Western world . 69 5.2 The Netherlands, 2005-2010 . 70 5.3 PVV and mosques . 71 5.4 In conclusion . 73 6 ISLAMOPHOBIA IN THE NETHERLANDS 6 Increasing discrimination? . 74 6.1 The concept of discrimination . 74 6.2 Treaties and laws . 75 6.3 Changes to policies and legislation . 77 6.3.1 Rights of residency . 78 6.3.2 Integration and cultural utterances . 80 6.4 Employment . 83 6.5 Education . 86 6.6 Housing . 89 6.7 In conclusion . 90 7 Summary, reflection, and recommendations . 92 Notes . 110 List of abbreviations . 112 About the author . 113 About EMCEMO . 114 7 FOREWORD The Iranian lawyer Shirin Ebadi, who was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 2003 for her work in campaigning for human rights, visited the University of Amsterdam in late 2011. In the midst of her concerns for human rights in her country, she has not lost sight of another side to history. The issue of the relationship between Islam and human rights, she remarked, was only seriously raised in the West when the world order that had been do- minated by the USSR collapsed in 1989. Until that time, the Taliban and all kinds of other dubious regimes had been welcome allies of the West in its fight against communism. In a single sentence, she highlighted the role of generalised depictions of enemies in power politics. After 1989, people were looking for a new enemy, says Shirin Ebadi, and found it – Islam. In 1993, Samuel Huntington wrote an article on ‘The Clash of Civiliza- tions?’ – with a question mark. Three years later, his book entitled The Clash of Civilizati- ons became a bestseller; the question mark had disappeared from the much-discussed title. Another five years later, a very small but dangerous minority in the world of Islam under the command of Osama bin Laden provided the apparent justification for the ever-larger exclamation mark that publicity had placed at the end of the title of Huntington’s book. In this day and age, research of the kind carried out by Ineke van der Valk is most welco- me. Her study has highlighted the real extent of the various guises of Islamophobia, and describes where they lead to discrimination based on faith. In the process, she examines the changes in how Islam and Muslims are depicted. At the end of the nineteenth century and the start of the twentieth century, Islam was mostly regarded as an exotic pheno- menon by Westerners. People were often unaware of the intense cultural exchanges that had taken place – primarily in Andalusia and, at the time, in the Balkans. Ineke van der Valk reminds us here of the criticism by Edward Said of Western European Orientalism. Nonetheless, many Orientalists, of whom Dutchman Snouck Hurgronje was one of the most important, bore strong feelings of deep respect. The historic conflicts between Islam and Christianity – or perhaps we should say, between competing ambitions for building imperia: see Henk Boom’s book on Süleyman the Mag- nificent, published in 2010 – still affect the way in which images are formed to this day. In the context of a democratic country that is subject to the rule of law, freedom of religious criticism is a fundamental right, even if such criticism is perceived as offensive to religious people. Everyone is free to determine which aspects or manifestations of religion they aim their criticism at. However, anyone tarring major religions and ideological movements with the same brush is committing a great disservice. Each has peace-loving elements, as well as intolerant or even violent ones. 8 ISLAMOPHOBIA IN THE NETHERLANDS The worst thing now is not the inaccurate (as judged by academic criteria) images that are being formed, but the result produced by prejudice in the relationships between people. If, for example, a Dutch political party claims that Islam is a political ideology and another says that it should be regarded as a religion, one opinion may well be more intolerant than the other, but it should also be said that both are simplifications. Like Christianity, Islam manifests itself in all sorts of different ways. Although some manifestations with links to political and economic power have acquired a political and ideological character, the vast majority of them are, in the current context, primarily religious in nature. In an honest discussion, both merit attention. A survey by the University of Amsterdam Institute for Migration and Ethnic Studies that was published in September 2010, showed that Muslims in the Netherlands – like Christians and Jews – from all kinds of back- grounds observe a strict or less strict form of their religion. However, by some distance, most do not, just like the adherents of other broad-based movements. Anyone who thinks there is a clear dividing line behind believers and non-believers is mistaken. The definition of a sensible policy is therefore one that is aimed at pernicious elements who harm other people, and which seeks to encourage everyone in our country to show mutual respect, regardless of religion, gender, or sexual orientation. For this reason, it is unfair to subject people to an extra loyalty test on account of their religion. Sometimes, attempts are made to hinder them in aspects of their way of life (such as by discrediting the wearing of headscarves), and these sometimes take on more subtle forms. When a European Convention set up by the EU and its member states was dra- wing up a preamble to the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, con- sideration was given to the idea of including a reference to the Judeo-Christian tradition of Europe. Because of the separation of church and state – which is particularly strictly observed in France – the choice eventually fell on the open formulation that the Union is “conscious of its spiritual and moral heritage”, which certainly includes the Judeo-Chris- tian tradition. In recent years, however, references to the Judeo-Christian heritage have started to re-emerge, sometimes with unpleasant undertones of a barrier against Islam.
Recommended publications
  • Reactionary Postmodernism? Neoliberalism, Multiculturalism, the Internet, and the Ideology of the New Far Right in Germany
    University of Vermont ScholarWorks @ UVM UVM Honors College Senior Theses Undergraduate Theses 2018 Reactionary Postmodernism? Neoliberalism, Multiculturalism, the Internet, and the Ideology of the New Far Right in Germany William Peter Fitz University of Vermont Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uvm.edu/hcoltheses Recommended Citation Fitz, William Peter, "Reactionary Postmodernism? Neoliberalism, Multiculturalism, the Internet, and the Ideology of the New Far Right in Germany" (2018). UVM Honors College Senior Theses. 275. https://scholarworks.uvm.edu/hcoltheses/275 This Honors College Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Undergraduate Theses at ScholarWorks @ UVM. It has been accepted for inclusion in UVM Honors College Senior Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ UVM. For more information, please contact [email protected]. REACTIONARY POSTMODERNISM? NEOLIBERALISM, MULTICULTURALISM, THE INTERNET, AND THE IDEOLOGY OF THE NEW FAR RIGHT IN GERMANY A Thesis Presented by William Peter Fitz to The Faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of The University of Vermont In Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements For the Degree of Bachelor of Arts In European Studies with Honors December 2018 Defense Date: December 4th, 2018 Thesis Committee: Alan E. Steinweis, Ph.D., Advisor Susanna Schrafstetter, Ph.D., Chairperson Adriana Borra, M.A. Table of Contents Introduction 1 Chapter One: Neoliberalism and Xenophobia 17 Chapter Two: Multiculturalism and Cultural Identity 52 Chapter Three: The Philosophy of the New Right 84 Chapter Four: The Internet and Meme Warfare 116 Conclusion 149 Bibliography 166 1 “Perhaps one will view the rise of the Alternative for Germany in the foreseeable future as inevitable, as a portent for major changes, one that is as necessary as it was predictable.
    [Show full text]
  • Walking the Talk: 2021 Blueprints for a Human Rights-Centered U.S
    Walking the Talk: 2021 Blueprints for a Human Rights-Centered U.S. Foreign Policy October 2020 Acknowledgments Human Rights First is a nonprofit, nonpartisan human rights advocacy and action organization based in Washington D.C., New York, and Los Angeles. © 2020 Human Rights First. All Rights Reserved. Walking the Talk: 2021 Blueprints for a Human Rights-Centered U.S. Foreign Policy was authored by Human Rights First’s staff and consultants. Senior Vice President for Policy Rob Berschinski served as lead author and editor-in-chief, assisted by Tolan Foreign Policy Legal Fellow Reece Pelley and intern Anna Van Niekerk. Contributing authors include: Eleanor Acer Scott Johnston Trevor Sutton Rob Berschinski David Mizner Raha Wala Cole Blum Reece Pelley Benjamin Haas Rita Siemion Significant assistance was provided by: Chris Anders Steven Feldstein Stephen Pomper Abigail Bellows Becky Gendelman Jennifer Quigley Brittany Benowitz Ryan Kaminski Scott Roehm Jim Bernfield Colleen Kelly Hina Shamsi Heather Brandon-Smith Kate Kizer Annie Shiel Christen Broecker Kennji Kizuka Mandy Smithberger Felice Gaer Dan Mahanty Sophia Swanson Bishop Garrison Kate Martin Yasmine Taeb Clark Gascoigne Jenny McAvoy Bailey Ulbricht Liza Goitein Sharon McBride Anna Van Niekerk Shannon Green Ian Moss Human Rights First challenges the United States of America to live up to its ideals. We believe American leadership is essential in the struggle for human dignity and the rule of law, and so we focus our advocacy on the U.S. government and other key actors able to leverage U.S. influence. When the U.S. government falters in its commitment to promote and protect human rights, we step in to demand reform, accountability, and justice.
    [Show full text]
  • March 12, 2021 Hon. Alejandro Mayorkas Hon. Antony Blinken Secretary Secretary Department of Homeland Security Department Of
    March 12, 2021 Hon. Alejandro Mayorkas Hon. Antony Blinken Secretary Secretary Department of Homeland Security Department of State 301 7th Street, SW 2201 C Street, NW Washington, DC 20528 Washington, DC 20520 CC: Esther Olavarria, Domestic Policy Council Roberta Jacobson, National Security Council Katie Tobin, National Security Council Re: Wind Down of the Migrant Protection Protocols Dear Secretaries Mayorkas and Blinken: Our faith-based, humanitarian, legal services, immigration, and human rights organizations and law school clinics welcome the administration’s initial steps to wind down the illegal and cruel Migrant Protection Protocols (MPP). We applaud the humane reception of the more than 1,400 asylum seekers brought to safety in the United States to date, the rapid processing of asylum seekers in the Matamoros tent encampment, and reported discussions to expand MPP processing to additional ports of entry. The recent designation of Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Venezuela is also a crucial and long overdue measure that will safeguard thousands of refugees from deportation. We write to recommend additional actions by the administration as the process to end MPP continues and to request further engagement and coordination to ensure people seeking refugee protection can find safety in the United States. We urge the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to immediately extend MPP processing to additional ports of entry and U.S. consulates, quickly expand processing to all individuals subjected to MPP, better coordinate with bi-national humanitarian and legal service providers assisting asylum seekers, provide necessary support for border communities welcoming asylum seekers, and address continued issues with the registration process.
    [Show full text]
  • Making City: the World Test Site Rotterdam 1 Main Exhibition Making City
    Making City: The World Test Site Rotterdam 1 Main Exhibition Making City BRUSSELS 2 Making City: The Netherlands [MC17] FLANDERS STUTTGART BERLIN URBAN REGION [SC16] [SC03] [SC04] [MC27] GLASGOW [SC06] VIENNA [SC22] WARSAW [SC23] ZÜRICH PARIS [MC32] EXHIBITION [MC11] MAKING CITY ISTANBUL KENTUCKY RIVER CITIES PARIS-SACLAY TEST SITE ISTANBUL ISTANBUL 0000 BEIJING [MC15] [MC23] [MC03] [SC21] PICHER BORDEAUX LOS ANGELES [SC19] [MC30] SENDAI [SC05] NEW YORK CITY VENICE DIYARBAKIR [SC09] ROUND ROCK WATERFRONT [MC19] [MC18] [MC20] [SC13] SAHARA NEW YORK CITY [SC20] QUEMOY/KINMEN HIGHLINE [SC17] [MC12] NILE CITY DELHI [MC22] [MC28] WILLETS POINT, QUEENS [SC08] GUATEMALA CITY [MC29] EXHIBITION MAKING DOUALA DOUALA 1104 BATAM TEST SITE SÃO PAULO CANTHINHO DO CÉU, SÃO PAULO [MC25] [MC02] [MC21] EXHIBITION DA CICADE INFORMAL JOHANNESBURG AOS NOVOS BAIRROS [SC10] SÃO PAULO 10.897 MELBOURNE [SC12] HELIÓPOLIS [SC14] [SC18] EXHIBITION ALMERE MAKING ALMERE [MC09] Making City: The Netherlands ALMERE 4075 2 GRONINGEN ALMERE [SC07] [SC01] GRONINGEN [MC33] OLYMPIC CITIES [MC08] AMSTERDAM ZUIDAS [MC04] THE METROPOLITAN LANDSCAPE, RANDSTAD [MC07] AMSTERDAM-NOORD [SC01] EDE-WAGENINGEN [MC26] THE HAGUE [MC24] ARNHEM [SC02] MAIN EXHIBITION MAKING CITY HAAGSE HAVENS OUDE-IJSSELSTREEK ROTTERDAM 45000 [MC13] [MC16] TEST SITE ROTTERDAM [MC01] FEIJENOORD, ROTTERDAM [SC15] MAKING INNER CITY ROTTERDAM [MC31] THE CITY OF ROTTERDAM SOUTH Test Site Rotterdam [MC05] EINDHOVEN [MC14] Main Exhibition Making City 3 Making City: Rotterdam KNOOPPUNTEN [MC10] RANDSTAD RHINE-MEUSE
    [Show full text]
  • 25 Jaar Undercover Voor BVD, AIVD En RID
    25 jaar undercover voor BVD, AIVD en RID Undercover Undercover gaan is het verhullen van de eigen identiteit of het aannemen van een andere identiteit, met als doel het vertrouwen te winnen van een persoon of organisatie om daarmee geheime informatie te verkrijgen of bewijzen te verzamelen van strafbare feiten of misstanden. (Bron: Wikipedia) Undercover: agent geheim agent (Bron: Dikke van Dale) Ethiek Ethiek of moraalwetenschap is een tak van de filosofie die zich bezighoudt met de kritische bezinning over het juiste handelen. In algemene zin probeert ethiek de criteria vast te stellen om te kunnen beoordelen of een handeling als goed of fout kan worden gekwalificeerd, en om de motieven en consequenties van deze handeling te kunnen evalueren. Het stellen van vragen over ethiek is natuurlijk geen monopolie van de filosofie. (Bron: Wikipedia) Een leven dat niet verteld kon worden Page 2 25 jaar undercover voor BVD, AIVD en RID Inhoudsopgave Voorwoord Hoofdstuk 1 De Telegraaf Hoofdstuk 2 Het begin Hoofdstuk 3 Antifascist Hoofdstuk 4 Blokkadeactie met gevolgen Hoofdstuk 5 Bedreigingen Hoofdstuk 6 Enige arrestatie in 25 jaar Hoofdstuk 7 Demonstraties 24 februari 1996 Zwolle Hoofdstuk 8 De AFA en de BVD: een curieuze ‘relatie’ Hoofdstuk 9 Demonstratierecht voor extreemrechts Hoofdstuk 10 Koerdische terreurorganisatie PKK Hoofdstuk 11 Andersglobalisten en een G8-Top Hoofdstuk 12 WISE, antikernenergie Hoofdstuk 13 Dierenrechtenactivist Hoofdstuk 14 Robert Molenaar, ‘dierenrechtenactivist nr. 1’ Hoofdstuk 15 Proefdierfokker Harlan: belangrijk
    [Show full text]
  • The Zimbabwean Human Rights Crisis: a Collaborative Approach to International Advocacy
    Davidson and Purohit: The Zimbabwean Human Rights Crisis: A Collaborative Approach to International Advocacy Note from the Field The Zimbabwean Human Rights Crisis: A Collaborative Approach to International Advocacy Lorna Davidson and Raj Purohitt Over the past several years, a serious human rights crisis has developed in Zimbabwe, where President Robert Mugabe employs repressive measures to cling to power. Civil society and human rights groups in Zimbabwe are among those who have come under attack by the government, and they face an extremely difficult challenge in bringing about positive change in the country. This article describes the development of the current crisis in Zimbabwe, focusing on the problems faced by local activists and organizations that seek to promote greater respect for human rights. It further discusses one recent initiative launched by the U.S.-based organization Human Rights First,which organized a consultative meeting of regional civil society groups in August 2003. The article addresses the role that can and should be played by internationalcivil society organizations, which must be sensitive to the contextual dynamics particularto the Zimbabwean crisis and to the region. If they are to be in any way effective, such organizations must act in supportof local actors and stronger regional networks. t Lorna Davidson is a Senior Associate in the Human Rights Defenders Program at Human Rights First in New York, N.Y, and Raj Purohit is the Legislative Director in the Washington, D.C. Office of Human Rights First. Human Rights First is the new name for the Lawyers Committee for Human Rights as of February 2004.
    [Show full text]
  • Stb. 2008, 434), Alsmede Dit Besluit, Treden in Werking Met Ingang Van 1 Januari Het Advies Van De Raad Van State Wordt Niet 2009
    Staatsblad van het Koninkrijk der Nederlanden Jaargang 2008 488 Besluit van 19 november 2008 tot wijziging van het Besluit nevenvestigings- en nevenzittingsplaatsen in verband met de aanwijzing van Wageningen, Gorinchem, Winschoten, Oost Gelre en Oude IJsselstreek als nevenzittingsplaats Wij Beatrix, bij de gratie Gods, Koningin der Nederlanden, Prinses van Oranje-Nassau, enz. enz. enz. Op de voordracht van Onze Minister van 13 oktober 2008, directie Wetgeving, nr. 5568265/08/6; Gelet op artikel II van de wet van 30 oktober 2008 tot wijziging van de Wet op de rechterlijke organisatie in verband met de aanwijzing van de nevenvestigingsplaatsen Wageningen, Gorinchem, Winschoten, Groenlo en Oude IJsselstreek als nevenzittingsplaats alsmede artikel 41, tweede lid, van de Wet op de rechterlijke organisatie; De Raad van State gehoord (advies van 22 oktober 2008, nr. W03.08.0445/II); Gezien het nader rapport van Onze Minister van Justitie van 13 november 2008, nr. 5571763/08/6; Hebben goedgevonden en verstaan: ARTIKEL I Het Besluit nevenvestigings- en nevenzittingsplaatsen wordt gewijzigd als volgt: A Artikel 3 komt te luiden: Artikel 3 De nevenzittingsplaatsen van de rechtbanken zijn: a. rechtbank Alkmaar: Den Helder; b. rechtbank Arnhem: Wageningen; c. rechtbank Dordrecht: Gorinchem; d. rechtbank Groningen: Winschoten; e. rechtbank Haarlem: Haarlemmermeer; f. rechtbank Leeuwarden: Sneek; g. rechtbank Roermond: Venray; Staatsblad 2008 488 1 h. rechtbank Rotterdam: Middelharnis; i. rechtbank Zutphen: Doetinchem, Harderwijk, Oost Gelre, Oude IJsselstreek; j. rechtbank Zwolle-Lelystad: Almere, Steenwijkerland. B De bijlage, bedoeld in artikel 12, eerste lid, wordt gewijzigd als volgt: 1. In het gestelde onder Rechtbank Arnhem wordt «Wageningen nevenvestigingsplaats» vervangen door: Wageningen nevenzittings- plaats.
    [Show full text]
  • Indeling Van Nederland in 40 COROP-Gebieden Gemeentelijke Indeling Van Nederland Op 1 Januari 2019
    Indeling van Nederland in 40 COROP-gebieden Gemeentelijke indeling van Nederland op 1 januari 2019 Legenda COROP-grens Het Hogeland Schiermonnikoog Gemeentegrens Ameland Woonkern Terschelling Het Hogeland 02 Noardeast-Fryslân Loppersum Appingedam Delfzijl Dantumadiel 03 Achtkarspelen Vlieland Waadhoeke 04 Westerkwartier GRONINGEN Midden-Groningen Oldambt Tytsjerksteradiel Harlingen LEEUWARDEN Smallingerland Veendam Westerwolde Noordenveld Tynaarlo Pekela Texel Opsterland Súdwest-Fryslân 01 06 Assen Aa en Hunze Stadskanaal Ooststellingwerf 05 07 Heerenveen Den Helder Borger-Odoorn De Fryske Marren Weststellingwerf Midden-Drenthe Hollands Westerveld Kroon Schagen 08 18 Steenwijkerland EMMEN 09 Coevorden Hoogeveen Medemblik Enkhuizen Opmeer Noordoostpolder Langedijk Stede Broec Meppel Heerhugowaard Bergen Drechterland Urk De Wolden Hoorn Koggenland 19 Staphorst Heiloo ALKMAAR Zwartewaterland Hardenberg Castricum Beemster Kampen 10 Edam- Volendam Uitgeest 40 ZWOLLE Ommen Heemskerk Dalfsen Wormerland Purmerend Dronten Beverwijk Lelystad 22 Hattem ZAANSTAD Twenterand 20 Oostzaan Waterland Oldebroek Velsen Landsmeer Tubbergen Bloemendaal Elburg Heerde Dinkelland Raalte 21 HAARLEM AMSTERDAM Zandvoort ALMERE Hellendoorn Almelo Heemstede Zeewolde Wierden 23 Diemen Harderwijk Nunspeet Olst- Wijhe 11 Losser Epe Borne HAARLEMMERMEER Gooise Oldenzaal Weesp Hillegom Meren Rijssen-Holten Ouder- Amstel Huizen Ermelo Amstelveen Blaricum Noordwijk Deventer 12 Hengelo Lisse Aalsmeer 24 Eemnes Laren Putten 25 Uithoorn Wijdemeren Bunschoten Hof van Voorst Teylingen
    [Show full text]
  • The Power of Multifunctionality
    Agentschap NL The Dutch Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment Future value now! The power of multifunctionality >>Focus on sustainability, innovation and international Future value now! The power of multifunctionality Community of Practice sustainable area development Foreword At a time when space and money have never been so scarce, individuals, More and more people are opening the treasure chest and discovering that a authorities and businesses are faced with new challenges. Professionals and new combination of functions is achievable socially. We are convinced, however, users who are involved in area development, production chains and social that there are still many more possibilities. To put it even more strongly, the services are looking for new earning models and cooperation. Working together failure to combine means missed opportunities. It is important to escape from on a development that is based on the finiteness of natural resources, resilience compartmentalised structures, because we cannot feel the loss of an and money. The NL Agency is also looking for new partnerships and green opportunity from within our own compartment. In this publication, we show development. The NL Agency is an agency of the Dutch Ministry of Economic that many ways have already been found, and we want to inspire and challenge Affairs, Agriculture and Innovation. people to seek new ways, by actually starting to practise multifunctionality. In practice, we want to see more value for less money. Business cases which are profitable. Sustainable development in a way that allows all parties to achieve NL Agency / Soil+ is a partner in the CityChlor project, co-funded by INTERREG their own interests beEer, faster or more cheaply.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Groningen Right-Wing Extremism in the Netherlands
    University of Groningen Right-Wing Extremism in the Netherlands Lucardie, Anthonie IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publication date: 2000 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): Lucardie, A. (2000). Right-Wing Extremism in the Netherlands: why it is still a marginal phenomenon. Paper presented at Symposium Right-Wing Extremism in Europe, Berlin, Germany. Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum. Download date: 25-09-2021 Right-Wing Extremism in the Netherlands: Why it is still a marginal phenomenon Dr. Paul Lucardie Documentation Centre Dutch Political Parties University of Groningen (The Netherlands) Paper presented at the Symposium Right-Wing Extremism in Europe Organized by the Academy for Politics and Current Affairs of the Hanns Seidel Foundation, Munich in cooperation with the European Centre for Research and Action on Racism and Antisemitism (C.E.R.A.), Paris at Berlin, 3 – 5 November 2000 2 Introduction At present, right-wing extremism seems a really marginal phenomenon in the Netherlands.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mainstream Right, the Far Right, and Coalition Formation in Western Europe by Kimberly Ann Twist a Dissertation Submitted In
    The Mainstream Right, the Far Right, and Coalition Formation in Western Europe by Kimberly Ann Twist A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Jonah D. Levy, Chair Professor Jason Wittenberg Professor Jacob Citrin Professor Katerina Linos Spring 2015 The Mainstream Right, the Far Right, and Coalition Formation in Western Europe Copyright 2015 by Kimberly Ann Twist Abstract The Mainstream Right, the Far Right, and Coalition Formation in Western Europe by Kimberly Ann Twist Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science University of California, Berkeley Professor Jonah D. Levy, Chair As long as far-right parties { known chiefly for their vehement opposition to immigration { have competed in contemporary Western Europe, scholars and observers have been concerned about these parties' implications for liberal democracy. Many originally believed that far- right parties would fade away due to a lack of voter support and their isolation by mainstream parties. Since 1994, however, far-right parties have been included in 17 governing coalitions across Western Europe. What explains the switch from exclusion to inclusion in Europe, and what drives mainstream-right parties' decisions to include or exclude the far right from coalitions today? My argument is centered on the cost of far-right exclusion, in terms of both office and policy goals for the mainstream right. I argue, first, that the major mainstream parties of Western Europe initially maintained the exclusion of the far right because it was relatively costless: They could govern and achieve policy goals without the far right.
    [Show full text]
  • The Extreme Right: Entry and Exit
    Racism & Extremism Monitor The extreme right: entry and exit Ineke van der Valk Willem Wagenaar Assisted by Froukje Demant Anne Frank House - Research and Documentation Leiden University - Department of Public Administration Translated by Nancy Forest-Flier © 2010 Anne Frank House Contents 1 Introduction 2 Theories of movement entry and exit 2.1 Factors involved in radicalisation 2.2 Factors involved in deradicalisation and disengagement 2.3 The pattern of the radicalisation and deradicalisation process 2.4 In conclusion 3 The extreme right 3.1 Definition 3.2 Groups 3.3 Right-wing extremism on the internet 3.4 The role of the respondents 3.5 Perception of the ideology 3.6 In conclusion 4 Preliminary phase 4.1 Backgrounds of the interviewees 4.2 Risk factors for radicalisation 4.3 Youth subcultures 4.4 In conclusion 5 Factors and phases in the radicalisation process 5.1 Factors 5.1.1 Social belonging 5.1.2 Excitement and adventure 5.1.3 Societal events 5.1.4 Ideological recognition 5.1.5 Violence as attraction and trigger 5.2 Phases 5.2.1 Phase 1. Joining up 5.2.2 Phase 2. Becoming a follower 5.2.3 Phase 3. Ideological development and identification 5.2.4 Phase 4. Further radicalisation: violence and isolation 5.3 In conclusion 6 Factors and phases in the deradicalisation process 6.1 Movement factors 6.1.1 Disappointment in the organisation 6.1.2 Aspects of social binding 6.1.3 Use of violence 6.1.4 Termination of the group 6.2 Advantages and disadvantages 6.2.1 Personal growth 6.2.2 Attraction of the outside world 6.2.3 Threat of repression
    [Show full text]