Maurolicus Muelleri ) Larvae, and Life History
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
BONY FISHES 602 Bony Fishes
click for previous page BONY FISHES 602 Bony Fishes GENERAL REMARKS by K.E. Carpenter, Old Dominion University, Virginia, USA ony fishes constitute the bulk, by far, of both the diversity and total landings of marine organisms encoun- Btered in fisheries of the Western Central Atlantic.They are found in all macrofaunal marine and estuarine habitats and exhibit a lavish array of adaptations to these environments. This extreme diversity of form and taxa presents an exceptional challenge for identification. There are 30 orders and 269 families of bony fishes presented in this guide, representing all families known from the area. Each order and family presents a unique suite of taxonomic problems and relevant characters. The purpose of this preliminary section on technical terms and guide to orders and families is to serve as an introduction and initial identification guide to this taxonomic diversity. It should also serve as a general reference for those features most commonly used in identification of bony fishes throughout the remaining volumes. However, I cannot begin to introduce the many facets of fish biology relevant to understanding the diversity of fishes in a few pages. For this, the reader is directed to one of the several general texts on fish biology such as the ones by Bond (1996), Moyle and Cech (1996), and Helfman et al.(1997) listed below. A general introduction to the fisheries of bony fishes in this region is given in the introduction to these volumes. Taxonomic details relevant to a specific family are explained under each of the appropriate family sections. The classification of bony fishes continues to transform as our knowledge of their evolutionary relationships improves. -
Søknad Om Ny Utslippstillatelse for Etablering Av Renseanlegg Og
Teknisk Fylkesmannen i Vestland 15 JULI 2020 Fylkesmannen i Vestland Saksnr. Njøsavegen 2 Arkivnr. 6863 LEIKANGER Sakshand. I Avd Vår ref: Saksbehandler / Direkte Telefon: Deres ref: Dato: 2020/4979-1 Sissel Aasebø/56 15 58 oo 10.07.2020 Søknad om utslipp av kommunalt avløpsvann og overvann i Søre Askøy tettbebyggelse På bakgrunn av endringene i avløpsstrukturen for Søre Askøy tettbebyggelse søker Askøy kommune om ny utslippstillatelse for etablering av renseanlegg og utslipp for avløpsområdet. Utslippssøknad er vedlagt i eget dokument. Søknaden er basert på gjeldende utslippstillatelse, supplert med opplysninger om endring i avløpsstrukturen. Krav til rensing er gitt i utslippstillatelser av 25.01.2011 og 12.10.2016. Det generelle kravet til rensing er sekundærrensing, men Askøy kommune har fått unntak fra sekundærrensekravet slik at primærrensing er gjeldende krav for dagens utslippstillatelse. Ut fra de signaler som i den senere tid et gitt av Miljødirektoratet fremgår det at overgangsfristen for å oppfylle primærrensekravene innen 31.12.2015 er endelig. Alternativt kan kommunene søke om ny utslippstillatelse basert på etablering av sekundærrensing, med mulighet for å få innvilget noe lengre frister. Askøy kommune ønsker på bakgrunn av signalene fra Miljødire1.'toratet å etablere sekundærrenseanlegg. Se vedlagte dokumenter. Med hilsen Anton Bøe leder Vann og avløp Sissel Aasebø leder VA forvaltning Brevet er godkjent elektronisk og har derfor ingen underskrift Postadresse: Besøksadresse: Telefon: Bank: Klampavikvegen 1, 5300 Kleppestø -
Detaljreguleringsplan for Mottak, Mellomlagring Og Eksportanlegg for CO2
Detaljreguleringsplan for mottak, mellomlagring og eksportanlegg for CO2 PLANPROGRAM Januar 2018 Øygarden kommune – Fedje kommune Detaljreguleringsplan for mottak, mellomlagring og eksportanlegg for CO2 Innhald 1 INNLEIING 3 1.1 Bakgrunn 3 1.2 Fullskala mottak, eksport og lagring av CO2 4 1.3 Lovverkets krav 4 1.4 Plan og konsekvensutgreiingsprosess 5 2 SKILDRING AV TILTAKET OG ALTERNATIVVURDERINGAR 7 2.1 Mottaks- og mellomlager på land 7 2.2 Stadvalprosess for mottaks- og mellomlager på land 8 2.3 Røyrleidning 8 2.4 Kontroll- og styringskabel 10 3 PLANOMRÅDET - DAGENS SITUASJON 11 3.1 Lokalisering 11 3.2 Planavgrensing 12 3.3 Dagens situasjon 17 4 OVERORDA FØRINGAR 18 4.1 Statlege føringar 18 4.2 Regionale føringar 18 4.3 Kommunale føringar 18 5 FORELØPIG VURDERINGAR AV MILJØKONSEKVENSAR OG MOGLEGE AVBØTANDE TILTAK 21 5.1 Miljø- og naturverdiar 21 5.2 Landskap og friluftsliv 22 5.3 Kulturminne og kulturmiljø 22 5.4 Utslepp til luft 24 5.5 Utslepp til sjø og ferskvatn 24 6 FORELØPIGE VURDERINGAR AV KONSEKVENSAR FOR FISKERIENE OG ANDRE NÆRINGAR 25 6.1 Fiskeri og oppdrett 25 6.2 Offshore- og havvindkraft 26 6.3 Andre næringar til sjøs 26 6.4 Landbruk 27 6.5 Andre næringar på land 27 7 FORELØPIGE VURDERINGAR AV SAMFUNNSMESSIGE KONSEKVENSAR 28 7.1 Grunneigarprosessar 28 7.2 Trafikale forhold og barns oppvekstvilkår 28 7.3 ROS analyse 28 7.4 Kraftbehov og tilknyting til kraftnettet 29 7.5 Avfall og avfallshandtering 29 7.6 Samfunnsøkonomiske forhold 29 8 FORSLAG TIL UTGREIINGSAKTIVITETAR I KONSEKVENSUTGREIINGA 30 8.1 Planlagd utgreiingsprogram 30 9 PROSESS OG MEDVERKNAD 33 9.1 Planprosessen 33 9.2 Gjennomføring av medverknad og informasjon 33 PLANPROGRAM 2 Detaljreguleringsplan for mottak, mellomlagring og eksportanlegg for CO2 1 INNLEIING Den 9. -
'Knm Helge Ingstad' and the Oil Tanker 'Sola Ts' on 8 November 2018, Outside the Sture Terminal in Hjeltefjorden in Hordaland County
Issued 29 November 2018 PRELIMINARY MARINE ACCIDENT REPORT – COLLISION BETWEEN THE FRIGATE 'KNM HELGE INGSTAD' AND THE OIL TANKER 'SOLA TS' ON 8 NOVEMBER 2018, OUTSIDE THE STURE TERMINAL IN HJELTEFJORDEN IN HORDALAND COUNTY. This report is a preliminary presentation of the AIBN's investigations relating to the accident and does not provide a full picture. The report may contain errors and inaccuracies. The final report will constitute the AIBN's official document relating to the accident and the investigation. Vessels: The frigate 'KNM Helge Ingstad' and the oil tanker 'Sola TS' Date and time (local time): Thursday 8 November 2018, at 04:01. Incident site: Outside the Sture terminal in Hjeltefjorden in Hordaland County. Weather conditions: Clear sky, good visibility Light conditions: Dark Type of transport operation: A naval vessel in transit and a merchant tanker carrying crude oil. Number of occupants: 137 persons on board 'KNM Helge Ingstad', 23 persons on board 'Sola TS' Personal injuries: No fatalities or seriously injured persons Damage to the vessels: Extensive damage to the frigate and minor damage to the tanker. Sources of information: Interviews with the operative crews involved, data from the vessels and the Norwegian Coastal Administration, including Fedje Vessel Traffic Service All times referred to in this report are local times (UTC + 1 Hour), if not otherwise stated. Introduction This preliminary report is published to communicate the information obtained during the initial phase of the ongoing investigation. The purpose is to provide a brief update on how the investigation is progressing as well as a preliminary description of the sequence of events and disseminate safety-critical issues identified at this stage of the investigation. -
Updated Checklist of Marine Fishes (Chordata: Craniata) from Portugal and the Proposed Extension of the Portuguese Continental Shelf
European Journal of Taxonomy 73: 1-73 ISSN 2118-9773 http://dx.doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2014.73 www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu 2014 · Carneiro M. et al. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Monograph urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9A5F217D-8E7B-448A-9CAB-2CCC9CC6F857 Updated checklist of marine fishes (Chordata: Craniata) from Portugal and the proposed extension of the Portuguese continental shelf Miguel CARNEIRO1,5, Rogélia MARTINS2,6, Monica LANDI*,3,7 & Filipe O. COSTA4,8 1,2 DIV-RP (Modelling and Management Fishery Resources Division), Instituto Português do Mar e da Atmosfera, Av. Brasilia 1449-006 Lisboa, Portugal. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] 3,4 CBMA (Centre of Molecular and Environmental Biology), Department of Biology, University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] * corresponding author: [email protected] 5 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:90A98A50-327E-4648-9DCE-75709C7A2472 6 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:1EB6DE00-9E91-407C-B7C4-34F31F29FD88 7 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:6D3AC760-77F2-4CFA-B5C7-665CB07F4CEB 8 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:48E53CF3-71C8-403C-BECD-10B20B3C15B4 Abstract. The study of the Portuguese marine ichthyofauna has a long historical tradition, rooted back in the 18th Century. Here we present an annotated checklist of the marine fishes from Portuguese waters, including the area encompassed by the proposed extension of the Portuguese continental shelf and the Economic Exclusive Zone (EEZ). The list is based on historical literature records and taxon occurrence data obtained from natural history collections, together with new revisions and occurrences. -
Phylogenetic Relationships of the South American Doradoidea (Ostariophysi: Siluriformes)
Neotropical Ichthyology, 12(3): 451-564, 2014 Copyright © 2014 Sociedade Brasileira de Ictiologia DOI: 10.1590/1982-0224-20120027 Phylogenetic relationships of the South American Doradoidea (Ostariophysi: Siluriformes) José L. O. Birindelli A phylogenetic analysis based on 311 morphological characters is presented for most species of the Doradidae, all genera of the Auchenipteridae, and representatives of 16 other catfish families. The hypothesis that was derived from the six most parsimonious trees support the monophyly of the South American Doradoidea (Doradidae plus Auchenipteridae), as well as the monophyly of the clade Doradoidea plus the African Mochokidae. In addition, the clade with Sisoroidea plus Aspredinidae was considered sister to Doradoidea plus Mochokidae. Within the Auchenipteridae, the results support the monophyly of the Centromochlinae and Auchenipterinae. The latter is composed of Tocantinsia, and four monophyletic units, two small with Asterophysus and Liosomadoras, and Pseudotatia and Pseudauchenipterus, respectively, and two large ones with the remaining genera. Within the Doradidae, parsimony analysis recovered Wertheimeria as sister to Kalyptodoras, composing a clade sister to all remaining doradids, which include Franciscodoras and two monophyletic groups: Astrodoradinae (plus Acanthodoras and Agamyxis) and Doradinae (new arrangement). Wertheimerinae, new subfamily, is described for Kalyptodoras and Wertheimeria. Doradinae is corroborated as monophyletic and composed of four groups, one including Centrochir and Platydoras, the other with the large-size species of doradids (except Oxydoras), another with Orinocodoras, Rhinodoras, and Rhynchodoras, and another with Oxydoras plus all the fimbriate-barbel doradids. Based on the results, the species of Opsodoras are included in Hemidoras; and Tenellus, new genus, is described to include Nemadoras trimaculatus, N. -
New Zealand Fishes a Field Guide to Common Species Caught by Bottom, Midwater, and Surface Fishing Cover Photos: Top – Kingfish (Seriola Lalandi), Malcolm Francis
New Zealand fishes A field guide to common species caught by bottom, midwater, and surface fishing Cover photos: Top – Kingfish (Seriola lalandi), Malcolm Francis. Top left – Snapper (Chrysophrys auratus), Malcolm Francis. Centre – Catch of hoki (Macruronus novaezelandiae), Neil Bagley (NIWA). Bottom left – Jack mackerel (Trachurus sp.), Malcolm Francis. Bottom – Orange roughy (Hoplostethus atlanticus), NIWA. New Zealand fishes A field guide to common species caught by bottom, midwater, and surface fishing New Zealand Aquatic Environment and Biodiversity Report No: 208 Prepared for Fisheries New Zealand by P. J. McMillan M. P. Francis G. D. James L. J. Paul P. Marriott E. J. Mackay B. A. Wood D. W. Stevens L. H. Griggs S. J. Baird C. D. Roberts‡ A. L. Stewart‡ C. D. Struthers‡ J. E. Robbins NIWA, Private Bag 14901, Wellington 6241 ‡ Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa, PO Box 467, Wellington, 6011Wellington ISSN 1176-9440 (print) ISSN 1179-6480 (online) ISBN 978-1-98-859425-5 (print) ISBN 978-1-98-859426-2 (online) 2019 Disclaimer While every effort was made to ensure the information in this publication is accurate, Fisheries New Zealand does not accept any responsibility or liability for error of fact, omission, interpretation or opinion that may be present, nor for the consequences of any decisions based on this information. Requests for further copies should be directed to: Publications Logistics Officer Ministry for Primary Industries PO Box 2526 WELLINGTON 6140 Email: [email protected] Telephone: 0800 00 83 33 Facsimile: 04-894 0300 This publication is also available on the Ministry for Primary Industries website at http://www.mpi.govt.nz/news-and-resources/publications/ A higher resolution (larger) PDF of this guide is also available by application to: [email protected] Citation: McMillan, P.J.; Francis, M.P.; James, G.D.; Paul, L.J.; Marriott, P.; Mackay, E.; Wood, B.A.; Stevens, D.W.; Griggs, L.H.; Baird, S.J.; Roberts, C.D.; Stewart, A.L.; Struthers, C.D.; Robbins, J.E. -
Recreational Fishing for Nephrops in Hordaland, Norway - Catches and Potential Mercury Intake
Recreational fishing for Nephrops in Hordaland, Norway - catches and potential mercury intake Christine Djønne Thesis for the Partial Fulfillment of the Degree Master of Science in Marine biology Department of Biological sciences University of Bergen June 2018 ii Acknowledgments First and foremost, I would like to thank my supervisors Keno Ferter, Jeppe Kolding and Martin Wiech for essential feedback throughout this entire year. A special thanks to Keno for always being available to answer questions through Facebook, even during fieldwork. Next, I would like to thank Jon Helge Vølstad, for letting me take part in the Fisheries Dynamics research group and conduct this study. My gratitude also extends to Knut Helge Jensen and Edvin Fuglebakk for their help with the statistical parts of my thesis, and to Berit Solli for her help with the DMA-analyses. Thanks to Marian Kjellevold for help with the questionnaire, and to Martin Ohldieck for helping me with ArcGIS collector and making the polygon maps. Thanks to Hanne Trømborg for helping me stay focused and positive this entire year. Thanks to Henry Seal for his friendship and writing advice. Also, thanks to Ina Nilsen and Hanne Trømborg for helping me with some of the sample preparation. Finally, I would like to thank all the participants who took the time to complete the questionnaires, and a special thanks to those providing samples for Hg analyses. Without their co-operation, it would not have been possible to conduct this study. iii iv Table of Contents Abbreviations ................................................................................................................................ -
Maurolicus Muelleri) Larvae and Life-History Consequences1 Arild Folkvord, Geir Gundersen, Jon Albretsen, Lars Asplin, Stein Kaartvedt, and Jarl Giske
163 ARTICLE Impact of hatch date on early life growth and survival of Mueller’s pearlside (Maurolicus muelleri) larvae and life-history consequences1 Arild Folkvord, Geir Gundersen, Jon Albretsen, Lars Asplin, Stein Kaartvedt, and Jarl Giske Abstract: Growth and survival of Maurolicus muelleri larvae in Herdlefjorden, Norway, were investigated by daily otolith incre- ment analysis. While high egg densities were generally observed throughout the spawning season, three cohorts each with a narrow window of hatching dates were identified. The first of these cohorts was characterized by low growth and poor morphometric condition and disappeared from the fjord during autumn. High-resolution drift modeling indicated that Herdlef- jorden had a net export of larvae and negligible import in the period cohort 1 disappeared. Yet, the advective loss rate of larvae was not considered high enough to explain the near complete disappearance of the first cohort. An otolith-based growth chronology indicated that growth conditions in Herdlefjorden improved noticeably around mid-September and remained favorable the following month. The analysis of daily otolith increments could thus be used to document within-season variability in larval growth and survival. The low and variable survival due to short-term fluctuations in environmental conditions indicate that multiple batch spawning is an adequately evolved life-history strategy for marine planktivorous fish such as M. muelleri. Résumé : La croissance et la survie des larves de Maurolicus muelleri dans le Herdlefjorden (Norvège) ont été étudiées par l'analyse des incréments quotidiens d'otolithes. Si de fortes densités d'œufs ont été généralement observées durant toute la saison de frai, trois cohortes ont néanmoins été identifiées, chacune présentant sa propre fourchette restreinte de dates d'éclosion. -
Mid-Atlantic Forage Species ID Guide
Mid-Atlantic Forage Species Identification Guide Forage Species Identification Guide Basic Morphology Dorsal fin Lateral line Caudal fin This guide provides descriptions and These species are subject to the codes for the forage species that vessels combined 1,700-pound trip limit: Opercle and dealers are required to report under Operculum • Anchovies the Mid-Atlantic Council’s Unmanaged Forage Omnibus Amendment. Find out • Argentines/Smelt Herring more about the amendment at: • Greeneyes Pectoral fin www.mafmc.org/forage. • Halfbeaks Pelvic fin Anal fin Caudal peduncle All federally permitted vessels fishing • Lanternfishes in the Mid-Atlantic Forage Species Dorsal Right (lateral) side Management Unit and dealers are • Round Herring required to report catch and landings of • Scaled Sardine the forage species listed to the right. All species listed in this guide are subject • Atlantic Thread Herring Anterior Posterior to the 1,700-pound trip limit unless • Spanish Sardine stated otherwise. • Pearlsides/Deepsea Hatchetfish • Sand Lances Left (lateral) side Ventral • Silversides • Cusk-eels Using the Guide • Atlantic Saury • Use the images and descriptions to identify species. • Unclassified Mollusks (Unmanaged Squids, Pteropods) • Report catch and sale of these species using the VTR code (red bubble) for • Other Crustaceans/Shellfish logbooks, or the common name (dark (Copepods, Krill, Amphipods) blue bubble) for dealer reports. 2 These species are subject to the combined 1,700-pound trip limit: • Anchovies • Argentines/Smelt Herring • -
Order MYCTOPHIFORMES NEOSCOPELIDAE Horizontal Rows
click for previous page 942 Bony Fishes Order MYCTOPHIFORMES NEOSCOPELIDAE Neoscopelids By K.E. Hartel, Harvard University, Massachusetts, USA and J.E. Craddock, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Massachusetts, USA iagnostic characters: Small fishes, usually 15 to 30 cm as adults. Body elongate with no photophores D(Scopelengys) or with 3 rows of large photophores when viewed from below (Neoscopelus).Eyes variable, small to large. Mouth large, extending to or beyond vertical from posterior margin of eye; tongue with photophores around margin in Neoscopelus. Gill rakers 9 to 16. Dorsal fin single, its origin above or slightly in front of pelvic fin, well in front of anal fins; 11 to 13 soft rays. Dorsal adipose fin over end of anal fin. Anal-fin origin well behind dorsal-fin base, anal fin with 10 to 14 soft rays. Pectoral fins long, reaching to about anus, anal fin with 15 to 19 rays.Pelvic fins large, usually reaching to anus.Scales large, cycloid, and de- ciduous. Colour: reddish silvery in Neoscopelus; blackish in Scopelengys. dorsal adipose fin anal-fin origin well behind dorsal-fin base Habitat, biology, and fisheries: Large adults of Neoscopelus usually benthopelagic below 1 000 m, but subadults mostly in midwater between 500 and 1 000 m in tropical and subtropical areas. Scopelengys meso- to bathypelagic. No known fisheries. Remarks: Three genera and 5 species with Solivomer not known from the Atlantic. All Atlantic species probably circumglobal . Similar families in occurring in area Myctophidae: photophores arranged in groups not in straight horizontal rows (except Taaningichthys paurolychnus which lacks photophores). Anal-fin origin under posterior dorsal-fin anal-fin base. -
Fishery Bulletin of the Fish and Wildlife Service V.53
'I', . FISRES OF '!'RE GULF OF MAINE. 101 Description.-The hickory shad differs rather Bay, though it is found in practically all of them. noticeably from the sea herring in that the point This opens the interesting possibility that the of origin of its dorsal fin is considerably in front of "green" fish found in Chesapeake Bay, leave the the mid-length of its trunk; in its deep belly (a Bay, perhaps to spawn in salt water.65 hickory shad 13~ in. long is about 4 in. deep but a General range.-Atlantic coast of North America herring of that length is only 3 in. deep) ; in the fact from the Bay of Fundy to Florida. that its outline tapers toward both snout and tail Occurrence in the Gulf oj Maine.-The hickory in side view (fig. 15); and in that its lower jaw shad is a southern fish, with the Gulf of Maine as projects farther beyond the upper when its mouth the extreme northern limit to its range. It is is closed; also, by the saw-toothed edge of its belly. recorded in scientific literature only at North Also, it lacks the cluster of teeth on the roof of the· Truro; at Provincetown; at Brewster; in Boston mouth that is characteristic of the herring. One Harbor; off Portland; in Casco Ba3T; and from the is more likely to confuse a hickory shad with a shad mouth of the Bay of Fundy (Huntsman doubts or with the alewives, which it resembles in the this record), and it usually is so uncommon within position of its dorsal fin, in the great depth of its our limits that we have seen none in the Gulf body, in its saw-toothed belly and in the lack of ourselves.