DOCSLIB.ORG

The Chicago Guide to Collaborative Ethnography on Writing, Editing, and Publishing How to Write a BA Thesis Jacques Barzun Charles Lipson

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Chicago Guide to Collaborative Ethnography on Writing, Editing, and Publishing How to Write a BA Thesis Jacques Barzun Charles Lipson The Chicago Guide to Collaborative Ethnography On Writing, Editing, and Publishing How to Write a BA Thesis Jacques Barzun Charles Lipson Tricks of the Trade The Chicago Guide to Writing about Howard S. Becker Multivariate Analysis Jane E. Miller Writing for Social Scientists Howard S. Becker The Chicago Guide to Writing about Numbers The Craft of Translation Jane E. Miller John Biguenet and Rainer Schulte, editors Mapping It Out Mark Monmonier The Craft of Research Wayne C. Booth, Gregory G. Colomb, The Chicago Guide to Communicating and Joseph M. Williams Science Scott L. Montgomery Glossary of Typesetting Terms Richard Eckersley, Richard Angstadt, Indexing Books Charles M. Ellerston, Richard Hendel, Nancy C. Mulvany Naomi B. Pascal, and Anita Walker Scott Getting into Print Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes Walter W. Powell Robert M. Emerson, Rachel I. Fretz, A Manual for Writers of Term Papers, and Linda L. Shaw Theses, and Dissertations Legal Writing in Plain English Kate L. Turabian Bryan A. Garner Tales of the Field From Dissertation to Book John Van Maanen William Germano Style Getting It Published Joseph M. Williams William Germano A Handbook of Biological Illustration A Poet’s Guide to Poetry Frances W. Zweifel Mary Kinzie Doing Honest Work in College Charles Lipson The Chicago Guide to collaborative ethnography Luke Eric Lassiter the university of chicago press Chicago and London luke eric lassiter is professor and director of the graduate humanities program at Marshall University Graduate College. He is the author or coauthor of several books, including Invitation to Anthropology. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago 60637 The University of Chicago Press, Ltd., London © 2005 by The University of Chicago All rights reserved. Published 2005 Printed in the United States of America 14 13 12 11 10 09 08 07 06 05 1 2 3 4 5 isbn: 0-226-46889-5 (cloth) isbn: 0-226-46890-9 (paper) Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Lassiter, Luke E. The Chicago guide to collaborative ethnography / Luke Eric Lassiter. p. cm.—(Chicago guides to writing, editing, and publishing) Includes bibliographical references and index. isbn 0-226-46889-5 (cloth : alk. paper)—isbn 0-226-46890-9 (pbk. : alk. paper) 1. Ethnology—Methodology. 2. Ethnology—Research. 3. Ethnology—Field work. I. Title: Collaborative ethnography. II. Title. III. Series. gn33.l35 2005 305.8'001—dc22 2005006396 o The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of the American National Standard for Information Sciences—Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ansi z39.48-1992. For Glenn D. Hinson, professor, colleague, and friend contents Preface and Acknowledgments ix part one history and theory 1 1 From “Reading over the Shoulders of Natives” to “Reading alongside Natives,” Literally: Toward a Collaborative and Reciprocal Ethnography 3 2 Defining a Collaborative Ethnography 15 3 On the Roots of Ethnographic Collaboration 25 4 The New (Critical) Ethnography: On Feminist and Postmodern Approaches to Collaboration 48 part two practice 77 5 Ethics and Moral Responsibility 79 6 Ethnographic Honesty 98 7 Accessible Writing 117 8 Collaborative Reading, Writing, and Co-interpretation 133 Notes 155 References 165 Index 191 preface and acknowledgments The El Dorado Task Force insists that the anthropology of indigenous peoples and related communities must move toward “collaborative” models, in which anthropological research is not merely combined with advocacy, but inherently advocative in that research is, from its outset, aimed at material, symbolic, and political benefits for the research population, as its members have helped to define these. Collaborative research involves the side-by-side work of all parties in a mutually beneficial research program. All parties are equal partners in the enterprise, participating in the development of the research design and in other major aspects of the program as well, working together toward a common goal. Collaborative research involves more than “giving back” in the form of advocacy and attention to social needs. Only in the collaborative model is there a full give and take, where at every step of the research knowledge and expertise is [sic] shared. In collaborative research, the local community will define its needs, and will seek experts both within and without to develop research programs and action plans. In the process of undertaking research on such community-defined needs, outside researchers may very well encounter knowledge that is of interest to anthropological theory. However, attention to such interests, or publication about them, must itself be developed within the collaborative framework, and may have to be set aside if they are not of equal concern to all the collaborators. In collaborative research, local experts work side by side with outside researchers, with a fully dialogic exchange of knowledge (that would not, of course, preclude conventional forms of training). —American Anthropological Association, El Dorado Task Force Papers in their final report to the American Anthropological Association, the El Dorado Task Force, which had been charged with assessing the allegations laid out by Patrick Tierney in his Darkness in El Dorado (2000), emphasized “collaborative research” as a critical component of their recommendations. In general these recommendations seemed a logical outgrowth of the whole Tierney a=air, but this particular call for collaborative research also marked a [ix [Preface and Acknowledgments ] climax of anthropology’s crisis in the overall project to represent others— first initiated in the 1960s and 1970s by a critique of anthropology’s colonial heritage. While most anthropologists would be hard-pressed to disagree with the El Dorado Task Force, some powerful anthropologists were quick to dis- miss their recommendations for collaborative research as unprofessional, invalid, even incompetent (see, e.g., Gross and Plattner 2002). This was not the first time those in power had dismissed the viability of collaborative re- search. As I will argue in this book, models for collaborative research have been around for a very long time. Although these models have been ignored or discarded before, collaboration with research subjects is today becoming one of the most important ethical, theoretical, and methodological issues in anthropology (see Brettell 1996; Hymes 2002; Jaarsma 2002; Marcus 2001). Of course, collaboration of sorts has always been a consequence of the intimate relationships that define anthropological research, but it is no longer just a taken-for-granted consequence of fieldwork; collaboration now preconditions and shapes both the design and the dissemination of research. This book is about the move from incidental and conditional collabo- ration to the building of a more deliberate and explicit collaborative ethnog- raphy. Ethnographic practice (whether carried out in single-sited or multi- sited communities) has always included collaboration on some level, but the collaborative ethnography to which I refer promises to extend that collabora- tion more systematically throughout both fieldwork and the writing process. This book, then, is about the history, theory, and practice of collabora- tive ethnography. I have split my discussion into two sections: history and theory (part 1) and practice (part 2). In part 1, I chart the history of collabo- rative ethnography in my own training and development as an anthropol- ogist, from my days as an undergraduate until the present, and more impor- tantly in the discipline as a whole. I center my discussion on the U.S. project in ethnography, though I do not exclude other regional developments. While ethnographic experiments in collaboration have transpired in British and French anthropology (see, e.g., Cli=ord 1982), I argue, like George E. Marcus and Michael M. J. Fischer (1986, viii), that U.S. anthropology’s still resonating experimental moment, centered on dialogue and collaboration in both eth- nographic fieldwork and writing, “reflects a historical development in which anthropology in the United States seems to be synthesizing the three national traditions” of British, French, and U.S. anthropology. On the other hand, I diverge somewhat from Marcus and Fischer (1986), contending, like Regna x] [ Preface and Acknowledgments ] Darnell (2001a), that the strongest precedents for collaborative practice were (and continue to be) most pronounced in the Americanist tradition, particularly in, but certainly not only in, Native American studies. Such long- established and time-honored experiments provide us the base, I believe, for more critically situating our current discussions of collaborative practice— particularly as they are now framed by feminist and postmodern approaches to ethnography. This contemporary discussion, in turn, provides us the base for realizing at last the fullest potential of collaborative ethnography. In part 2, I outline the steps for achieving this more deliberate and ex- plicit collaborative ethnography. It is, of course, my own particular vision; and mine is by no means the only vision. I thus seek to combine my collaborative research experience with the experiences of many others, both past and pres- ent, to provide what I believe is a rich foundation for building a contemporary collaborative ethnography. My discussion of practice is not meant to replace earlier surveys of research methods and procedures (such as participant- observation/observant participation) that obviously rest on field collabora-
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Perspectives: an Open Invitation to Cultural Anthropology Edited by Nina Brown, Laura Tubelle De González, and Thomas Mcilwraith
    Perspectives: An Open Invitation to Cultural Anthropology Edited by Nina Brown, Laura Tubelle de González, and Thomas McIlwraith 2017 American Anthropological Association American Anthropological Association 2300 Clarendon Blvd, Suite 1301 Arlington, VA 22201 ISBN: 978–1-931303–55–2 http://www.perspectivesanthro.org This book is a project of the Society for Anthropology in Community Colleges (SACC) http://sacc.americananthro.org/ and our parent organization, the American Anthropological Association (AAA). Please refer to the website for a complete table of contents and more information about the book. PUBLIC ANTHROPOLOGY Robert Borofsky, Hawaii Pacific University, Center for a Public Anthropology [email protected] http://www.publicanthropology.org/ LEARNING OBJECTIVES As an example of public anthropology (following the model • Explain how the structure of academic of the Kahn Academy), Dr. Borofsky has created short careers, topical specialization, and 10–15 minute videos on key topics in anthropology for in- writing styles contribute to difficulty troductory students. All 28 videos are available from the with communicating findings from Perspectives: An Open Introduction to Cultural Anthropology academic anthropology to a wider website. public. • Identify examples of anthropological INTRODUCTION research that has contributed to the public good. Was Julie Andrews right when (in the Sound of Music) • Define public anthropology and she sang, “Let’s start at the very beginning, a very good place distinguish it from academic to start?” Should authors follow her advice in writing text- anthropology and applied book chapters by, at the beginning, explaining the organiza- anthropology. tion of the chapter so readers will know what to expect and • Assess the factors that contribute be able to follow the chapter’s themes clearly? I cannot sing to a desire for public engagement in Do Re Me half as well as Julie Andrews.
    [Show full text]
  • Second Opinion February 2018
    3/5/2018 Second Opinion: Newsletter of the Society for Medical Anthropology Subscribe Past Issues Translate RSS Newsletter of the Society for Medical Anthropology View this email in your browser February 2018 / Vol. 6, Issue 1 In This Issue: From the SMA President Congratulations to 2017 SMA Award Recipients! SMA-SPA Box Lunch Mentoring Receives High Praise Updates from MASA SMA Welcomes New Anthropology News Liaisons CPF: 2018 Sections Editions of Anthropology News SMA Call for Proposals: 2018 AAA Annual Meeting Society for Applied Anthropology 2018 Annual Meeting Past President EJ Sobo's Parting Words: A Focus on Readiness for Rapid Response Book Announcements General Announcements Facebook Twitter Website From the SMA President Dear SMA members, I’m pleased to write for the first time in Second Opinion as President of the Society for Medical Anthropology. First, I’d like to share with you some new business that we discussed at our board meeting last December. We voted to create the Hazel Weidman Award for Exemplary Service, which will be presented every other year starting in 2019, named after the driving force behind the creation of the predecessors of Medical Anthropology Quarterly and the SMA. We also voted to organize the third SMA conference in 2019, this time in a Latin American country. Our purpose is to acknowledge and engage the intellectual production coming from that region, particularly in three areas: 1) critical epidemiology, social medicine, and critical medical anthropology, 2) indigenous movements and intercultural care in health, and 3) sexual and reproductive health and rights. However, the conference would not be bounded to any particular region; instead, it would have a focus on entangled and shared histories and on the work of displacements and decentering.
    [Show full text]
  • Anthropology in Disciplinary Context: Definitional Struggles and Key Debates (Or Answering the Cri Du Coeur)
    Medical CHAPTER 1 Anthropology in Disciplinary Context: Definitional Struggles and Key Debates (or Answering the Cri Du Coeur) Elisa J. Sobo INTRODUCTION As Scotch noted back in 1963, “Medical scholars have literally for centuries been aware of the social dimensions of health and illness and have, in their research, focused on a variety of social and cultural variables, while anthropology has only lately indulged in similar research” (p.30). Many working outside of anthropology advocated early on for socio- culturally informed approaches, and called for changes in social structure, occupational expectations, and urban environments to defeat certain epidemics (e.g., Bernadine Ramazzini, Benjamin McCrady, Lous- René Villermé, Emil Chad- wick, Lemuel Shattuck,COPYRIGHTED Rudolph Virchow, Henry E. MATERIAL Sigerist, and Erwin H. Ackerk- necht (Scotch 1963:30–31). If we consider the work of these forebears as well as varied anatomists, physiologists, geographers, etc., who shared early anthropologist’s scholarly interest in the human condition, it becomes clear that medical anthropology exists as the outcome of many lines of intertwined inquiry into humankind, some of which emerged in different fields independently – and some of which provoked fur- ther interest in health in anthropology proper. A Companion to Medical Anthropology, First Edition. Edited by Merrill Singer and Pamela I. Erickson. © 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Published 2011 by Blackwell Publishing Ltd. SSinger_c01.inddinger_c01.indd 9 11/20/2011/20/2011 11:24:14:24:14 PPMM 10 ELISA J. SOBO A crucial example of this came with the end of World War II, when medical anthro- pology received impetus and support from foundation- and government- funded applied work in the arena of international and public health.
    [Show full text]
  • The Psychotropic Self/Imaginary: Subjectivity and Psychopharmaceutical Use Among Heroin Users with Co-Occurring Mental Illness
    Cult Med Psychiatry DOI 10.1007/s11013-011-9244-9 ORIGINAL PAPER The Psychotropic Self/Imaginary: Subjectivity and Psychopharmaceutical Use Among Heroin Users with Co-Occurring Mental Illness Allison V. Schlosser • Lee D. Hoffer Ó Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012 Abstract Many people diagnosed with mental illnesses struggle with illicit drug addiction. These individuals are often treated with psychiatric medications, yet little is known about how they experience this treatment. Research on the subjective experience of psychiatric medication use highlights the complex, contradictory, and ambiguous feelings often associated with this treatment. However, for those with mental illness and addiction, this experience is complicated by the need to manage both psychiatric medication and illicit drug use. Using ethnographic data from a study of heroin use in Northeast Ohio, we explore this experience by expanding the pharmaceutical self/imaginary (Jenkins, Pharmaceutical Self: The Global Shaping of Experience in an Age of Psychopharmacology, School for Advanced Research Press, Santa Fe, NM, 2010b) to include psychopharmaceuticals and illicit drugs, what we call the psychotropic self/imaginary. Through this lens we explore the ways participants interpret and manage their psychotropic drug use in relation to sociocultural, institutional, and political–economic contexts. This analysis reveals how participants seek desired effects of legally prescribed and illicit drugs to treat mental illness, manage heroin addiction, and maintain a perceived ‘‘normal’’ self. Participants manage their drug use using active strategies, such as selective use of psychiatric medications, in the context of structural constraints, such as restricted access to mental health care, and cultural contexts that blur distinctions between ‘‘good’’ medicines and ‘‘bad’’ drugs.
    [Show full text]
  • Three Propositions for a Critically Applied Medical Anthropology Nancy Scheper-Hughes
    Three Propositions For a Critically Applied Medical Anthropology Nancy Scheper-Hughes There is a medical anthropology joke that has been makdng the rounds among gradu- ate students.' On the west coast it first surfaced following a symposium on "The Anthro- pology of Sickness" held during the Kroeber Anthropological Society meetings in the spring of 1986 at which several distinguished medical anthropologists were invited to share their ideas and research agendas. The joke goes something like this, although there are several variants, depending on the particular sympathies of the teller. A doctor and three medical anthropologists - Hans Baer, Michael Taussig, and Arthur Kleinman2 - are standing by a river. Suddenly they hear the final cries of a drowning man. The doctor jumps into the river and, after battling against the swift current, hauls in and tries to resuscitate the dead man. After a short while another body floats by and the same attempt is made to save it. Another and another comes down the stream. Finally it occurs to Hans Baer to head up stream in order to investigate the contradictions in the capitalist mode of production that are responsible for the mass fatalities. Meanwhile Taussig goes off, very much on his own, bushwalking in search of the cryptic message in the bottle that at least one dying man or woman would have had the foresight to send out. Dr. Kleinman, however, stays behind at the river bank in order to help facilitate the doctor-patient relationship. There is a real dilemma that is being posed in this whimsical "morality tale" (or it is a mortality tale?) for our troubled subdiscipline.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Centre of Social Medicine and Community Health
    CENTRE OF SOCIAL MEDICINE AND COMMUNITY HEALTH SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES JNU WINTER SEMESTER- 2016-2017 M.PHIL SOCIAL SCIENCES IN HEALTH PROGRAMME COURSE NO. : SM 622 TOTAL CREDITS : TWO TITLE OF THE COURSE : Application of Anthropology in Health COURSE IN CHARGE : SUNITA REDDY MODE OF INSTRUCTION : Lectures, Group Exercises,Group Discussions MODE OF EVALUATION : Term papers, group assignment, Book review, Viva Voce. Medical Anthropology studies have built upon historical and cultural analysis over a long period of time that indicate an array of difference with respect to the metaphors and meanings that signify health. These studies emphasize cultural fabrics that give coherence and depth to these meanings such that cosmology and ethical traditions come to define the body in states of sickness and well being. Anthropological studies of health focus on local contexts where health and illness are recognized and responded to culture, affects health as much through the culture of biomedicine. Moving on from cultural deterministic undertanding of health, critical medical anthropology grounds health and illness in the political economy persoectives. This course gives an understanding of the basic concepts, theories and methods used in Anthropology, which can be applied to public health. Further the course focuses on various medical systems, cultural contexts of health, illness and medicine and commodification of bodies and body politics. 1. Concepts, Theories and Methods in Anthropology 2. Medical Systems 3. Cultural Context of Health, Illness and Medicine and Critical Medical Anthropology 4. Sickness and Healing 5. Commodyfying Bodies Reading List Section 1 1. Sargent Carolyn F. and Thoma M. Johnson (1996). Medical Anthropology.
    [Show full text]
  • ANTH 5201.001 Medical Anthropology
    Anthropology 5201.001 Health, Healing, and Society: Medical Anthropology Fall 2019 Wednesdays 6 – 8:50pm Chilton Hall 126 Instructor: Doug Henry Office Hours: Wed 1:15 – 3:30, or by appointment Office: Chilton Hall, suite 330 (Anthropology Department) Phone: 565-3836 Email: [email protected] COURSE DESCRIPTION AND OBJECTIVES Course Content This course is a graduate-level seminar introduction to my favorite part of anthropology- medical anthropology. If you’ve never taken medical anthropology, that’s OK, but I’ll assume that everyone has had some background into thinking critically about health, wellness, medicine, and society- either through an undergraduate course, or on your own. We’ll cover both classics and modern work on disease etiology, “embodiment” and the experience of suffering, “ethnomedical” beliefs, “sick role” behavior, the provision of health services, so called “biocultural” aspects of disease, structural violence, and the role of larger political/ economic factors on provision of health care, as well as the creation and elimination of health disparities. Course Objectives • By the end of the course, you should be able to define medical anthropology and understand the nature, scope, and contributions of the discipline. • Be able to describe the application of theory in medical anthropology, and the strengths and weaknesses of each approach. • Apply all of this to specific health related topics, to address real-world health problems. CLASSROOM COMMUNITY Attendance and Participation This is a small graduate seminar, so you all will HAVE to come to every class having read, prepared, and being ready to discuss. How much people get out of the class is in large part determined by how much everyone puts into the class.
    [Show full text]
  • CURRICULUM VITAE Carolyn Sargent Contact
    CURRICULUM VITAE Carolyn Sargent Contact: Department of Anthropology Washington University in St. Louis (Tel.) 214-695-6949 Education: 1968 B.A. High Honors, Justin Morrill Residential College (Liberal Arts), Michigan State University 1970 M.A. Social Anthropology, University of Manchester, Manchester, England 1979 Ph.D. Anthropology, Michigan State University University Appointments: 2009- Washington University Institute for Public Health Scholar 2008-- Professor, Washington University in St. Louis (Department of Anthropology; Affiliated Professor, Women, Gender and Sexuality Studiees) 1994-2007 Director, Women's Studies Program, Southern Methodist University 1992-- Professor, Southern Methodist University 1985-- Associate Professor, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, Texas 1980-85 Assistant Professor, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, Texas Visiting Research Appointments: 2005-- Research Fellow, IRIS, (Interdisciplinary Research Institute, University of Paris 13, Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales, INSERM) 2 2000-2005 Research Fellow, University of Paris V, Center for the Study of African and Asian Populations (2002 renamed Inter-Population Center) 1999-2000 Research Fellow, INED (National Institute for the Study of Demography), Paris, France 1998 Research Fellow, CEPED (Center for the Study of Population and Development), Paris, France 1987 Research Fellow, Institute of Social and Economic Research, University of the West Indies, Jamaica Research Grants: 2015-2016 Neighborhood Impacts on Breast Cancer in Paris (with Sarah Gehlert, Brown School; Pierre Chauvin, INSERM-France). Collaborative Research Seed Grant, Brown School, Washington University, $15,000 2014-2016 Cancer and Sociality. (National Science Foundation, $150,000, Sargent PI, Peter Benson, Co-PI). 2012 “Towards an Anthropology of Breast Cancer.” Provost’s Seed Grant ($25,000), with Sarah Gehlert, Peter Benson, Stephanie Larchanche.
    [Show full text]
  • Anthropology - ANTH 353
    Applied Medical Anthropology - ANTH 353 Meeting time/place: Mondays, 1-4 p.m. in Beach Hall, room 404 Course overview This course, designed for graduate students in anthropology and related health and social sciences, will critically exam medical anthropology in use in approaching and solving human health-related problems globally, within the United States, and in Connecticut. Emphasis will be on history of medical anthropology within the broader context of applied anthropology, theoretical models and debates, anthropological approaches to understanding health, challenges of application, anthropology and health policy, ethical considerations in applied research and application, and specific roles of anthropologists in applied health initiatives. Assignments and Evaluation Your grade in this course will be based on preparation for and participation in class discussions (25%), a midterm oral presentation (35%), and a term paper (40%). There will be no examinations. Class Participation: As a seminar, prepared participation is a core feature of the course. Students will be evaluated for their familiarity with required readings, their leadership on individually assigned readings, and their general class participation. Oral Presentation: Each student will prepare 20 minute (plus time for questions & answers from instructor and other students) PowerPoint for oral presentation in class for mid-March on a relevant topic of their choice (approved in advanced by the instructor). This should follow the format of a professional conference presentation
    [Show full text]
  • Fall 2020 Online 1
    Fall 2020 Online ANTH 313: GLOBAL HEALTH ISSUES THIS COURSE TAKES PLACE COMPLETELY ONLINE Instructor: Melanie A. Medeiros Email: [email protected] Online Modules: For this course, you will have module assignments due every Tuesday at 3:30pm. Zoom Class Sessions: Almost every Tuesday at 4:00pm we will meet as a class via Zoom. The link to our Zoom meeting will be shared via Canvas. You will be notified via Canvas Announcements when we do not have a Thursday Zoom meeting. Attendance and participation in Zoom class discussions is highly recommended but not required. “Office hours”: Visit the link posted to the Canvas home page to schedule a Zoom appointment with Dr. Medeiros. Her regular meeting times will be Tuesdays 2:00-3:30pm and Thursdays 11:20am- 12:50pm. Teaching Assistant: Gail Cabahug, [email protected] Teaching Assistant Office Hours: Gail will be available for Zoom appointments in place of regular office hours. Please email her directly to schedule an appointment. COURSE DESCRIPTION This course examines the effects of globalization on the health of people around the globe and relates disparities in the spread of preventable diseases and access to basic health services to the growing inequality between rich and poor nations. The course draws from contemporary global health research to explore issues such as the spread of infectious and chronic disease, food and water insecurity, environmental health, and the effects of violence and war on global health. The theoretical perspectives used to analyze these issues draw on the work of critical medical anthropology, ecosocial epidemiology, applied anthropology, and public health.
    [Show full text]
  • Critical Medical Anthropology
    Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine 2015, Vol 22, No 2, 385–389 REVIEW ARTICLE www.aaem.pl Critical Medical Anthropology – a voice for just and equitable healthcare Anna Witeska-Młynarczyk1 1 Institute of Ethnology and Cultural Anthropology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznan, Poland Witeska-Młynarczyk A. Critical Medical Anthropology – a voice for just and equitable healthcare. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2015; 22(2): 385–389. doi: 10.5604/12321966.1152099 Abstract The article presents a paradigm current in contemporary medical anthropology – Critical Medical Anthropology (CMA), which merges political-economic approaches with a culturally sensitive analysis of human behaviour grounded in anthropological methods. It is characterized by a strongly applied orientation and a devotion to improving population health and promoting health equity. The beginning of CMA dates back to the 1970s when the interdisciplinary movement called the political economy of health was developed. Today, CMA has grown into one of three major perspectives used in anthropological research devoted to health, illness and wellbeing. The author discusses the origins, key concepts and CMA’s usefulness for social research, and its significance for the design of effective policies in the realm of public health. Examplary interventions and ethnographic researches are introduced and wider usage is advocated of such works and methods by bureaucrats and medical staff for understanding the patients’ behavior, and the influence of social, economic and political factors on the workings of particular health systems. Key words medical anthropology, evidence-based medicine, social justice, cultural diversity INTRODUCTION Anthropology (CMA) – the paradigm which merges political- economic approaches with culturally sensitive analysis of Medical anthropology advances an interdisciplinary research human behavior grounded in anthropological methods [2].
    [Show full text]
  • The Economic, Social, and Cultural Context of AIDS Among Latinos
    SIDA: The Economic, Social, and Cultural Context of AIDS among Latinos Author(s): Merrill Singer, Cándida Flores, Lani Davison, Georgine Burke, Zaida Castillo, Kelley Scanlon and Migdalia Rivera Source: Medical Anthropology Quarterly, New Series, Vol. 4, No. 1, Culture and Behavior in the AIDS Epidemic (Mar., 1990), pp. 72-114 Published by: Wiley on behalf of the American Anthropological Association Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/648524 Accessed: 12-10-2016 19:32 UTC REFERENCES Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article: http://www.jstor.org/stable/648524?seq=1&cid=pdf-reference#references_tab_contents You may need to log in to JSTOR to access the linked references. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://about.jstor.org/terms American Anthropological Association, Wiley are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Medical Anthropology Quarterly This content downloaded from 200.75.19.153 on Wed, 12 Oct 2016 19:32:15 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms MERRILL SINGER CANDIDA FLORES LANI DAVISON GEORGINE BURKE ZAIDA CASTILLO KEI,L,EY SCANLON MIGDALIA RIVERA Hispanic Health Council SIDA: The Economic, Social, and Cultural Context of AIDS among Latinos Statistics on reported cases demonstrate clearly that AIDS is dispropor- tionately prevalent among U.S.
    [Show full text]