Pesticide Risk Assessment (S

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Pesticide Risk Assessment (S 1 Pesticides An enormous number of chemicals exist in trichogramma. The management of pests nature, which are used as pesticides, for actually disturbs the balance of nature, agricultural and non-agricultural purposes. thereby affecting biodiversity on Earth. Pesticides are introduced to manage popula- Pesticides can adversely affect non-target tions of living organisms, called pests, which organisms as well as affecting other ecologi- are deleterious to crops or the health of the cal components of the environment, which human race. A literal meaning of pesticide is they are not intended to do. ‘a substance used to kill undesired living organisms’. However the Food and Agricul- ture Organization (FAO, 2013) has defined 1.1 History pesticide as: any substance or mixture of substances Until the 1940s, during World War Two, intended for preventing, destroying, or pesticides were widely used for pest control controlling any pest, including vectors of to ensure food security by the introduction human or animal disease, unwanted species of inorganic chemicals such as calcium, lead of plants or animals, causing harm during arsenate and sulfur, and the use of common or otherwise interfering with the produc- salt and sodium chlorate as herbicides. The tion, processing, storage, transport, or organic molecules of this period were natu- marketing of food, agricultural commodi- ral products such as nicotine (extracted from ties, wood and wood products or animal tobacco) and rotenone (extracted from der- feedstuffs, or substances that may be administered to animals for the control of ris roots). These were named first-generation insects, arachnids, or other pests in or on pesticides. These pesticides, including heavy their bodies. The term includes substances metals, were toxic to humans and agricul- intended for use as a plant growth regula- tural plants. The growth in synthetic pesti- tor, defoliant, desiccant, or agent for cides accelerated in the 1940s with the thinning fruit or preventing the premature discovery of the effects of organochlorines, fall of fruit. Also used as substances applied known as second- generation pesticides, such to crops either before or after harvest to as dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT), protect the commodity from deterioration b-hexachlorocyclohexane (BHC), aldrin, during storage and transport. dieldrin, endrin, chlordane, parathion, cap- Pest management is also achieved by the use tan and 2,4-dichlor ophenoxyacetic acid (2,4- of other biological active agents, such as D). The discovery of DDT by Dr Paul Muller, CAB International 2019. Pesticide Risk Assessment (S. Arora) 3 4 Chapter 1 in 1939 was a turning point that revolution- During the 1970s and 1980s, a herbi- ized agricultural production. DDT was popu- cide, ‘glyphosate’, currently the world’s best- lar because of its broad-spectrum activity selling herbicide product, was introduced, (Unsworth, 2008) and was widely used. It followed by sulfonylurea and imidazolinone appeared to have low toxicity to mammals, products. The insecticide industry marked and reduced the incidence of insect-borne the era of the third generation of pesticides, diseases, such as malaria, yellow fever and with the introduction of avermectins, ben- typhus. Consequently, in 1949, Dr Paul zoylureas and Bt (Bacillus thuringiensis). The Muller won the Nobel Prize in Medicine for triazole, morpholine, imidazole, pyrimidine discovering its insecticidal properties. How- and dicarboxamide families of fungicides ever, in 1946, resistance to DDT in house were also introduced during this period. flies was reported and, because of its wide- The massive use of pesticides during the spread use, there were reports of harm to 1960s significantly increased agricultural non-target plants and animals and problems productivity leading to the ‘Green Revolu- with residues (Unsworth, 2008). These tion’ and a safe and secure food supply, along insecticides were observed to be toxic to with other secondary benefits. However, humans and agricultural plants, due to some of the first-generation pesticides had their bioaccumulation and biomagnification the drawback of persistence in soils and properties. aquatic sediments, bioconcentration in the Throughout the 1950s, consumers and tissues of invertebrates, moving up trophic most policy makers were not overly con- chains and affecting top predators. Many cerned about the potential health risks asso- chemicals that have been identified as endo- ciated with using these pesticides, as these crine disruptors are pesticides. Of these, were considered safer than the forms of 46% are insecticides, 21% herbicides and arsenic that were used and had killed people 31% fungicides; some of them were with- in the 1920s and 1930s (Wessel’s Living drawn from general use many years ago but History Farm, 1930). However, the indis- are still found in the environment (e.g. DDT criminate use of these highly persistent and atrazine) (Mnif et al., 2011). Endocrine organochlorines could generate a lot of disruptor compounds (EDCs) have been problems as highlighted by Rachel Carson in defined in 2002 by the World Health Organi- her 1962 book Silent Spring (Carson, 2002 zation (WHO): ‘An endocrine disruptor is an [1962]). The problems necessitated a search exogenous substance or mixture that alters for safer and more environmentally friendly the function(s) of the endocrine system and products, which ushered in the era of consequently causes adverse health effects smarter pesticides. Organophosphates and in an intact organism, or its progeny, or carbamates replaced the highly persistent (sub)populations’ (Combarnous, 2017). organochlorines (Table 1.1). In the 1930s, Pesticides with common modes of a German chemist Gerhard Schrader at IG action become more selective and generally Farben experimented with nerve poison lead to resistance problems. During the insecticides, organophosphates, which were 1990s research continued to find new mole- meant to be used as chemical warfare agents cules with greater selectivity and better during World War II (López-Muñoz et al., environmental and toxicological profiles. 2009). After World War II, the organophos- New families like strobilurins and azolone phate pesticides were synthesized in large were introduced as fungicides, as well as fip- quantities. Parathion was among the first roles and spinosyn as insecticides with lower marketed, followed by malathion and dosages in grams instead of kilograms per azinphosmethyl. These insecticides became hectare. The introduction of user-friendly more popular after many of the organochlo- and environmentally safer formulations has rine insecticides like DDT, dieldrin and hep- helped to combat the problem of resistance tachlor were banned in the 1970s. Although management. The integrated pest manage- less persistent in the environment, they are ment (IPM) approach has led to a reduction more lethal even at low dosages. in the load of synthetic pesticides because of Table 1.1. History of pesticides according to their generation. Category Example Period of marketing Group of pesticides Benefits Drawbacks Reference First Heavy metals such World War I; prior to Inorganic and organic Pest management Toxic to humans and agricultural Hummel, generation as As, Cu and Pb 1940 botanical compounds plants 1983 Second DDT, methoxychlor, Post-World War I; 1940 Organochlorines Highly effective for Highly persistent due to their Hummel, generation lindane onwards (widespread malaria control bioaccumulation and 1983 (synthetic) use, 1940–1960) biomagnification properties Dimethoate, Early 1950s Organophosphates and Less persistent in Acutely potent nerve toxins and Hummel, malathion; (widespread use, carbamates environment more lethal even at low dosages 1983 aldicarb, carbaryl post-1970s) Permethrin, 1970s Synthetic pyrethroids Knock-down activity They are axonic excitotoxins; can Hummel, cypermethrin and be combined with the synergist 1983 deltamethrin piperonyl butoxide (PBO) Third Insect growth By 1975 Juvenile hormones, chitin Disrupt and impede the Selective, less harmful to the Hummel, generation regulator synthesis inhibitors, life cycle of insects environment, compatible with 1983 moulting hormones, pest management systems Pesticides precocenes, and compounds that mimic their effects Microbials Late 1970s Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) Toxins produced following No human health or Gaalaas Bt protein in 1990s ingestion environmental hazards Mullaney, 2018 Fourth Behaviour modifiers Late 1990s Sex attractants, mating Interfere with normal Volatile, specific, potent, and Metcalf and generation (Antifeedants, disruptors behaviour patterns, non-toxic Metcalf, pheromones) delay or prevent mating 1994 and producing offspring Fifth Promising leads Late 1990s Nereistoxin (a neurotoxic Model compound tor the Sensitive to sunlight, should be Hummel, generation (natural products, substance isolated synthesis of the kept in dark (Fourouzan and 1983 brain hormone from the marine insecticide cartap Farrokh-Eslamlu, 2017) antagonist) annelid Lumbriconereis heteropoda) Endocrine Initiated from first Man-made Target a critical life cycle Alter the normal functioning of the Mnif et al., disruptors generation until date stage of insects endocrine system of both 2011 wildlife and humans DDT, dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane. 5 6 Chapter 1 the other components for pest management pesticides tends to be more intense and that are involved. Resistant varieties, genet- unsafe. The regulatory, health and education ically engineered
Recommended publications
  • 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid
    2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid IUPAC (2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetic acid name 2,4-D Other hedonal names trinoxol Identifiers CAS [94-75-7] number SMILES OC(COC1=CC=C(Cl)C=C1Cl)=O ChemSpider 1441 ID Properties Molecular C H Cl O formula 8 6 2 3 Molar mass 221.04 g mol−1 Appearance white to yellow powder Melting point 140.5 °C (413.5 K) Boiling 160 °C (0.4 mm Hg) point Solubility in 900 mg/L (25 °C) water Related compounds Related 2,4,5-T, Dichlorprop compounds Except where noted otherwise, data are given for materials in their standard state (at 25 °C, 100 kPa) 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) is a common systemic herbicide used in the control of broadleaf weeds. It is the most widely used herbicide in the world, and the third most commonly used in North America.[1] 2,4-D is also an important synthetic auxin, often used in laboratories for plant research and as a supplement in plant cell culture media such as MS medium. History 2,4-D was developed during World War II by a British team at Rothamsted Experimental Station, under the leadership of Judah Hirsch Quastel, aiming to increase crop yields for a nation at war.[citation needed] When it was commercially released in 1946, it became the first successful selective herbicide and allowed for greatly enhanced weed control in wheat, maize (corn), rice, and similar cereal grass crop, because it only kills dicots, leaving behind monocots. Mechanism of herbicide action 2,4-D is a synthetic auxin, which is a class of plant growth regulators.
    [Show full text]
  • Common and Chemical Names of Herbicides Approved by the WSSA
    Weed Science 2010 58:511–518 Common and Chemical Names of Herbicides Approved by the Weed Science Society of America Below is the complete list of all common and chemical of herbicides as approved by the International Organization names of herbicides approved by the Weed Science Society of for Standardization (ISO). A sponsor may submit a proposal America (WSSA) and updated as of September 1, 2010. for a common name directly to the WSSA Terminology Beginning in 1996, it has been published yearly in the last Committee. issue of Weed Science with Directions for Contributors to A herbicide common name is not synonymous with Weed Science. This list is published in lieu of the selections a commercial formulation of the same herbicide, and in printed previously on the back cover of Weed Science. Only many instances, is not synonymous with the active ingredient common and chemical names included in this complete of a commercial formulation as identified on the product list should be used in WSSA publications. In the absence of label. If the herbicide is a salt or simple ester of a parent a WSSA-approved common name, the industry code number compound, the WSSA common name applies to the parent as compiled by the Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) with compound only. CAS systematic chemical name or the systematic chemical The chemical name used in this list is that preferred by the name alone may be used. The current approved list is also Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) according to their system of available at our web site (www.wssa.net).
    [Show full text]
  • Toxicidade De Herbicidas Pós- Emergentes Em Cultivares De Feijão-Caupi
    TOXICIDADE DE HERBICIDAS PÓS- EMERGENTES EM CULTIVARES DE FEIJÃO-CAUPI THIAGO REIS PRADO 2016 THIAGO REIS PRADO TOXICIDADE DE HERBICIDAS PÓS-EMERGENTES EM CULTIVARES DE FEIJÃO-CAUPI Dissertação apresentada à Universidade Estadual do Sudoeste da Bahia, Campus de Vitória da Conquista, para obtenção do título de Mestre em Agronomia. Orientador: Prof. D.Sc.Alcebíades Rebouças São José VITÓRIA DA CONQUISTA BAHIA - BRASIL 2016 P915t Prado, Thiago Reis. Toxicidade de herbicidas pós-emergentes em cultivares de feijão-caupi. / Thiago Reis Prado. 55f. Orientador (a): D.Sc. Alcebíades Rebouças São José. Dissertação (mestrado) – Universidade Estadual do Sudoeste da Bahia, Programa de Pós-graduação em Agronomia, área de concentração em Fitotecnia. Vitória da Conquista, 2016. Referências: f. 50-55. 1. Vigna unguiculata - Cultivo. 2. Controle químico. 3. Planta daninha. 4. Fitotoxidade. I. São José, Alcebíades Rebouças II. Universidade Estadual do Sudoeste da Bahia, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Agronomia, área de Concentração em Fitotecnia. III. T. CDD: 633.33 Catalogação na fonte : Juliana Teixeira de Assunção – CRB 5/18 90 UESB – Campus Vitória da Conquista - BA Aos meus pais, Paulo Soares Prado e Maria José Reis Prado, que, sempre dedicados à minha educação e fortes na fé, atuam de forma singular com seus ensinamentos e suas orações. Dedico Agradecimentos A Deus, por iluminar minha vida e guiar por todos os caminhos. Aos meus pais, Paulo Soares Prado e Maria José Reis Prado, pelo amor e por apoiarem sempre as decisões para realização dos meus sonhos. Ao Prof. Dr. Alcebíades Rebouças São José, pela confiança, orientação, compreensão e amizade durante todo o curso do mestrado.
    [Show full text]
  • Glufosinate-Tolerant Cotton: Tolerance and Weed
    GLUFOSINATE-TOLERANT COTTON: TOLERANCE AND WEED MANAGEMENT by LESLI KRISTEN BLAIR, B.S. A THESIS IN CROP SCIENCE Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Texas Tech University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Approved Accepted Deamof the Graduate School December, 1991 ^^•ft:;^ ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 1i would like to extend my heartfelt gratitude to the members that served on 7 '^ '^* my advisory committee for their time, effort, and assistance. I would like to thank Dr. Dotray for his guidance and direction in the preparation of this thesis; Dr. Keeling for his instruction and support in monitoring these experiments; Dr. Gannaway for his knowledge and assistance in the biotechnology and breeding associated with this project; and Dr. Thompson for her friendship and support in making career decisions. Without all of their guidance, I could never have achieved the goals that we set. I wish to thank all of my fellow graduate students in Weed Science for their help in completing this project. I would especially like to thank Alan Helm for his endless help collecting all of the first year data, Ginger Light for her help in clarifying concepts, and LeAnna Lyon for her help with the last year's project. Their support, friendship, and help on this project have been immeasurable. I would like to express my sincerest thanks to AgrEvo and TxCot for their funding of this research. My thanks also go to the people at the USDA-ARS in Lubbock for all of their help before and after I became involved with this research.
    [Show full text]
  • Herbicide Mode of Action Table High Resistance Risk
    Herbicide Mode of Action Table High resistance risk Chemical family Active constituent (first registered trade name) GROUP 1 Inhibition of acetyl co-enzyme A carboxylase (ACC’ase inhibitors) clodinafop (Topik®), cyhalofop (Agixa®*, Barnstorm®), diclofop (Cheetah® Gold* Decision®*, Hoegrass®), Aryloxyphenoxy- fenoxaprop (Cheetah®, Gold*, Wildcat®), fluazifop propionates (FOPs) (Fusilade®), haloxyfop (Verdict®), propaquizafop (Shogun®), quizalofop (Targa®) Cyclohexanediones (DIMs) butroxydim (Factor®*), clethodim (Select®), profoxydim (Aura®), sethoxydim (Cheetah® Gold*, Decision®*), tralkoxydim (Achieve®) Phenylpyrazoles (DENs) pinoxaden (Axial®) GROUP 2 Inhibition of acetolactate synthase (ALS inhibitors), acetohydroxyacid synthase (AHAS) Imidazolinones (IMIs) imazamox (Intervix®*, Raptor®), imazapic (Bobcat I-Maxx®*, Flame®, Midas®*, OnDuty®*), imazapyr (Arsenal Xpress®*, Intervix®*, Lightning®*, Midas®* OnDuty®*), imazethapyr (Lightning®*, Spinnaker®) Pyrimidinyl–thio- bispyribac (Nominee®), pyrithiobac (Staple®) benzoates Sulfonylureas (SUs) azimsulfuron (Gulliver®), bensulfuron (Londax®), chlorsulfuron (Glean®), ethoxysulfuron (Hero®), foramsulfuron (Tribute®), halosulfuron (Sempra®), iodosulfuron (Hussar®), mesosulfuron (Atlantis®), metsulfuron (Ally®, Harmony®* M, Stinger®*, Trounce®*, Ultimate Brushweed®* Herbicide), prosulfuron (Casper®*), rimsulfuron (Titus®), sulfometuron (Oust®, Eucmix Pre Plant®*, Trimac Plus®*), sulfosulfuron (Monza®), thifensulfuron (Harmony®* M), triasulfuron (Logran®, Logran® B-Power®*), tribenuron (Express®),
    [Show full text]
  • Exposure to Herbicides in House Dust and Risk of Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
    Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology (2013) 23, 363–370 & 2013 Nature America, Inc. All rights reserved 1559-0631/13 www.nature.com/jes ORIGINAL ARTICLE Exposure to herbicides in house dust and risk of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia Catherine Metayer1, Joanne S. Colt2, Patricia A. Buffler1, Helen D. Reed3, Steve Selvin1, Vonda Crouse4 and Mary H. Ward2 We examine the association between exposure to herbicides and childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Dust samples were collected from homes of 269 ALL cases and 333 healthy controls (o8 years of age at diagnosis/reference date and residing in same home since diagnosis/reference date) in California, using a high-volume surface sampler or household vacuum bags. Amounts of agricultural or professional herbicides (alachlor, metolachlor, bromoxynil, bromoxynil octanoate, pebulate, butylate, prometryn, simazine, ethalfluralin, and pendimethalin) and residential herbicides (cyanazine, trifluralin, 2-methyl-4- chlorophenoxyacetic acid (MCPA), mecoprop, 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D), chlorthal, and dicamba) were measured. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated by logistic regression. Models included the herbicide of interest, age, sex, race/ethnicity, household income, year and season of dust sampling, neighborhood type, and residence type. The risk of childhood ALL was associated with dust levels of chlorthal; compared to homes with no detections, ORs for the first, second, and third tertiles were 1.49 (95% CI: 0.82–2.72), 1.49 (95% CI: 0.83–2.67), and 1.57 (95% CI: 0.90–2.73), respectively (P-value for linear trend ¼ 0.05). The magnitude of this association appeared to be higher in the presence of alachlor.
    [Show full text]
  • WO 2013/037955 Al 21 March 2013 (21.03.2013) P O P C T
    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization I International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date WO 2013/037955 Al 21 March 2013 (21.03.2013) P O P C T (51) International Patent Classification: (81) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every A01N 25/00 (2006.01) A OIN 43/653 (2006.01) kind of national protection available): AE, AG, AL, AM, A0 41/06 (2006.01) A01N 37/50 (2006.01) AO, AT, AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG, BH, BN, BR, BW, BY, BZ, CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DK, DM, (21) Number: International Application DO, DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, PCT/EP2012/068096 HN, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IS, JP, KE, KG, KM, KN, KP, (22) International Filing Date: KR, KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LT, LU, LY, MA, MD, 14 September 2012 (14.09.2012) ME, MG, MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, NO, NZ, OM, PA, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, QA, RO, RS, RU, (25) Filing Language: English RW, SC, SD, SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TH, TJ, (26) Publication Language: English TM, TN, TR, TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM, ZW. (30) Priority Data: 1118 1702.9 16 September 201 1 (16.09.201 1) EP (84) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every kind of regional protection available): ARIPO (BW, GH, (71) Applicant (for all designated States except US): BAYER GM, KE, LR, LS, MW, MZ, NA, RW, SD, SL, SZ, TZ, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY GMBH [DE/DE]; Al- UG, ZM, ZW), Eurasian (AM, AZ, BY, KG, KZ, RU, TJ, fred-Nobel-Str.
    [Show full text]
  • R Graphics Output
    Dexamethasone sodium phosphate ( 0.339 ) Melengestrol acetate ( 0.282 ) 17beta−Trenbolone ( 0.252 ) 17alpha−Estradiol ( 0.24 ) 17alpha−Hydroxyprogesterone ( 0.238 ) Triamcinolone ( 0.233 ) Zearalenone ( 0.216 ) CP−634384 ( 0.21 ) 17alpha−Ethinylestradiol ( 0.203 ) Raloxifene hydrochloride ( 0.203 ) Volinanserin ( 0.2 ) Tiratricol ( 0.197 ) trans−Retinoic acid ( 0.192 ) Chlorpromazine hydrochloride ( 0.191 ) PharmaGSID_47315 ( 0.185 ) Apigenin ( 0.183 ) Diethylstilbestrol ( 0.178 ) 4−Dodecylphenol ( 0.161 ) 2,2',6,6'−Tetrachlorobisphenol A ( 0.156 ) o,p'−DDD ( 0.155 ) Progesterone ( 0.152 ) 4−Hydroxytamoxifen ( 0.151 ) SSR150106 ( 0.149 ) Equilin ( 0.3 ) 3,5,3'−Triiodothyronine ( 0.256 ) 17−Methyltestosterone ( 0.242 ) 17beta−Estradiol ( 0.24 ) 5alpha−Dihydrotestosterone ( 0.235 ) Mifepristone ( 0.218 ) Norethindrone ( 0.214 ) Spironolactone ( 0.204 ) Farglitazar ( 0.203 ) Testosterone propionate ( 0.202 ) meso−Hexestrol ( 0.199 ) Mestranol ( 0.196 ) Estriol ( 0.191 ) 2,2',4,4'−Tetrahydroxybenzophenone ( 0.185 ) 3,3,5,5−Tetraiodothyroacetic acid ( 0.183 ) Norgestrel ( 0.181 ) Cyproterone acetate ( 0.164 ) GSK232420A ( 0.161 ) N−Dodecanoyl−N−methylglycine ( 0.155 ) Pentachloroanisole ( 0.154 ) HPTE ( 0.151 ) Biochanin A ( 0.15 ) Dehydroepiandrosterone ( 0.149 ) PharmaCode_333941 ( 0.148 ) Prednisone ( 0.146 ) Nordihydroguaiaretic acid ( 0.145 ) p,p'−DDD ( 0.144 ) Diphenhydramine hydrochloride ( 0.142 ) Forskolin ( 0.141 ) Perfluorooctanoic acid ( 0.14 ) Oleyl sarcosine ( 0.139 ) Cyclohexylphenylketone ( 0.138 ) Pirinixic acid ( 0.137 )
    [Show full text]
  • CFS Science Comments I
    April 27, 2012 Docket No. APHIS–2010–0103 Regulatory Analysis and Development PPD, APHIS Station 3A-03.8 4700 River Road Unit 118 Riverdale, MD 20737-1238 Comments to USDA APHIS on Environmental Assessment for the Determination of Nonregulated Status of Herbicide-Tolerant DAS-40278-9 Corn, Zea mays, Event DAS- 40278-9 Center for Food Safety, Science Comments I – By Bill Freese, Science Policy Analyst These comments submitted by Center for Food Safety are one of three sets of comments from our organization. Legal comments and a second set of science comments are also being submitted. The references cited have been uploaded as supporting materials. The filenames for these documents match the citations in the text, and are all incorporated as (e.g. Benbrook 2012). Full citations are included at the end of each section. THE IMPACT OF DAS-40278-9 ON CORN HERBICIDE USE Summary of herbicide use Dow’s DAS-402787-9 corn is genetically engineered for resistance to 2,4-D and quizalofop, and if deregulated would be marketed with additional resistance to glyphosate and likely glufosinate – fostering greater use of three to four herbicide classes. APHIS must assess DAS-42078-9 as Dow intends it to be used, as a weed control system. DAS-40278-9 eliminates the risk of crop injury that currently limits 2,4-D use on corn, and is thus reasonably projected to trigger an up to 30-fold increase in the use of this toxic herbicide on corn, equivalent to a four-fold increase in overall agricultural use of 2,4-D, by the end of the decade.
    [Show full text]
  • INDEX to PESTICIDE TYPES and FAMILIES and PART 180 TOLERANCE INFORMATION of PESTICIDE CHEMICALS in FOOD and FEED COMMODITIES
    US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Pesticide Programs INDEX to PESTICIDE TYPES and FAMILIES and PART 180 TOLERANCE INFORMATION of PESTICIDE CHEMICALS in FOOD and FEED COMMODITIES Note: Pesticide tolerance information is updated in the Code of Federal Regulations on a weekly basis. EPA plans to update these indexes biannually. These indexes are current as of the date indicated in the pdf file. For the latest information on pesticide tolerances, please check the electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR) at http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/waisidx_07/40cfrv23_07.html 1 40 CFR Type Family Common name CAS Number PC code 180.163 Acaricide bridged diphenyl Dicofol (1,1-Bis(chlorophenyl)-2,2,2-trichloroethanol) 115-32-2 10501 180.198 Acaricide phosphonate Trichlorfon 52-68-6 57901 180.259 Acaricide sulfite ester Propargite 2312-35-8 97601 180.446 Acaricide tetrazine Clofentezine 74115-24-5 125501 180.448 Acaricide thiazolidine Hexythiazox 78587-05-0 128849 180.517 Acaricide phenylpyrazole Fipronil 120068-37-3 129121 180.566 Acaricide pyrazole Fenpyroximate 134098-61-6 129131 180.572 Acaricide carbazate Bifenazate 149877-41-8 586 180.593 Acaricide unclassified Etoxazole 153233-91-1 107091 180.599 Acaricide unclassified Acequinocyl 57960-19-7 6329 180.341 Acaricide, fungicide dinitrophenol Dinocap (2, 4-Dinitro-6-octylphenyl crotonate and 2,6-dinitro-4- 39300-45-3 36001 octylphenyl crotonate} 180.111 Acaricide, insecticide organophosphorus Malathion 121-75-5 57701 180.182 Acaricide, insecticide cyclodiene Endosulfan 115-29-7 79401
    [Show full text]
  • WO 2013/020985 Al 14 February 2013 (14.02.2013) P O P C T
    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization I International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date WO 2013/020985 Al 14 February 2013 (14.02.2013) P O P C T (51) International Patent Classification: (74) Agent: BAYER INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY A 47/06 (2006.01) A01P 7/02 (2006.01) GMBH; Alfred-Nobel-Str. 10, 40789 Monheim (DE). A01N 57/20 (2006.01) A01P 7/04 (2006.01) (81) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every A01P 5/00 (2006.01) kind of national protection available): AE, AG, AL, AM, (21) International Application Number: AO, AT, AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG, BH, BN, BR, BW, BY, PCT/EP2012/065469 BZ, CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DK, DM, DO, DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, (22) International Filing Date: HN, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IS, JP, KE, KG, KM, KN, KP, 7 August 2012 (07.08.2012) KR, KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LT, LU, LY, MA, MD, (25) Filing Language: English ME, MG, MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, NO, NZ, OM, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, QA, RO, RS, RU, RW, (26) Publication Language: English SC, SD, SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TH, TJ, TM, (30) Priority Data: TN, TR, TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM, 61/521,827 10 August 201 1 (10.08.201 1) US ZW. (71) Applicant (for all designated States except US): BAYER (84) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY GMBH [DE/DE]; Al- kind of regional protection available): ARIPO (BW, GH, fred-Nobel-Str.
    [Show full text]
  • Approved Uses of Registered Insecticides (Crop Based)
    Approved uses of registered insecticides (Crop based) Dosage / ha Formulation Spray fluid Crop Insecticide Common name of the pest a.i (gm) (gm/ml) (Liter) Bifenthrin 8 SC Mites 60 7.5ml/lit 10 lit/tree Carbofuran 3 CG Woolly aphid 5/tree 166/tree _ Chlorpyrifos 20 EC Aphid 0.0005 3750-5000 1500-2000 Dimethoate 30 EC Stem borer 0.0003 1485-1980 1500-2000 Red spider mite and two spotted Fenazaquin 10 EC 40 400 1000 mite Hexythiazox 5.45 W/W EC European Red Mite 0.00002 0.0004 10ltr./tree Malathion 50 EC Sanjose scale, Wooly aphid 0.0005 1500-2000 1500-2000 Sanjose scale 0.0007 4200-5600 1500-2000 Oxydemeton – Methyl 25 EC Apple Wooly Aphid 0.00025 1500-2000 1500-2000 100-150gm/ Phorate 10 CG Woolly aphid 10- 15/ plant _ plant European red Mite, Two spotted Propargite 57 EC 2.85-5.7 /tree 5-10 ml/tree 10 lit/tree mite Quinalphos 25 EC Wooly Aphid 0.0005 3000-4000 500-1000 European Red Mite & Red Spider Spiromesifen 22.9 SC 72(0.03) 300 1000 mite As per size of Thiacloprid 21.7 SC Thrips 0.01- 0.012 0.04-0.05 tree Apricot Dimethoate 30 EC Aphid 0.0003 1485-1980 1500-2000 Carbofuran 3 CG Shoot fly 1500 50000 _ Dimethoate 30 EC Milky weed bug 180-200 594-660 500-1000 Bajra Shoot fly 3000 30000 _ Phorate 10 CG White grub 2500 25000 _ Banana Carbofuran 3 CG Rhizome weevil 1 g/ suckers 33g/sucker _ Aphid 50g/suckers 166g/sucker _ Nematode 1.5g/suckers 50g/suckers _ Dimethoate 30 EC Aphid, Lace wing bug 0.0003 1485-1980 1500-2000 Tingyi bug 0.00025 1500-2000 1500-2000 Oxydemeton – Methyl 25 EC Aphids 0.0005 3000-4000 1500-2000 2.5 -1.25/ 25 -12.5/ Phorate 10 CG Aphid _ plant plant Quinalphos 25 EC Tingid bug 0.0005 3000-4000 500-1000 Phosalone 35 EC Aphid 500 1428 500-1000 Aphid 1000 33300 _ Barely Carbofuran 3 CG Jassid 1250 41600 _ Cyst nematode 1000 33300 _ Phorate 10 CG Aphid 1000 10000 _ Beans Chlorpyrifos 20 EC Pod borer , Black bug 600 3000 500-1000 Chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SC Pod borers 25 125 500 Chlorpyrifos 1.5 DP Helicoverpa armigera 375 25000 _ Azadirachtin 0.03 (300 PPM) Pod Borer _ _ _ Bacillus thuringiensis Var.
    [Show full text]