DOCSLIB.ORG

Neutron Star Mergers and How to Study Them

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Neutron Star Mergers and How to Study Them Living Reviews in Relativity https://doi.org/10.1007/s41114-020-00028-7(0123456789().,-volV)(0123456789().,-volV) REVIEW ARTICLE Neutron star mergers and how to study them Eric Burns1 Received: 5 January 2020 / Accepted: 12 October 2020 Ó The Author(s) 2020 Abstract Neutron star mergers are the canonical multimessenger events: they have been observed through photons for half a century, gravitational waves since 2017, and are likely to be sources of neutrinos and cosmic rays. Studies of these events enable unique insights into astrophysics, particles in the ultrarelativistic regime, the heavy element enrichment history through cosmic time, cosmology, dense matter, and fundamental physics. Uncovering this science requires vast observational resources, unparalleled coordination, and advancements in theory and simulation, which are constrained by our current understanding of nuclear, atomic, and astroparticle physics. This review begins with a summary of our current knowledge of these events, the expected observational signatures, and estimated detection rates for the next decade. I then present the key observations necessary to advance our under- standing of these sources, followed by the broad science this enables. I close with a discussion on the necessary future capabilities to fully utilize these enigmatic sources to understand our universe. Keywords Gravitational waves Á Neutron stars Á Black holes Á Nucleosynthesis Á Cosmology Á Equation of state Abbreviations BAO Baryon acoustic oscillation BAT Burst Alert Telescope BATSE Burst and Transient Source Experiment BBN Big Bang Nucleosynthesis BH Black Hole BBH Binary Black Hole BNS Binary Neutron Star CBC Compact Binary Coalescence & Eric Burns [email protected] 1 Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA 123 E. Burns CMB Cosmic Microwave Background CCSNe Core-Collapse Supernova explosion CGRO Compton Gamma-Ray Observatory CTA Cherenkov Telescope Array CO Compact Object CR Cosmic Ray EM Electromagnetic FAR False Alarm Rate FoV Field of View EOS Equation of State GBM Gamma-ray Burst Monitor GCN Gamma-ray Coordinates Network GR General Relativity GRB Gamma-ray burst GW Gravitational wave HAWC High-Altitude Water Cherenkov HMNS HyperMassive Neutron Star IACT Imaging Atmospheric Cherenkov Telescope INTEGRAL INTErnational Gamma-Ray Astrophysics Laboratory IPN Interplanetary Network IR Infrared ISCO Innermost Stable Circular Orbit ISM Interstellar medium JWST James Webb Space Telescope KAGRA Kamioka Gravitational Wave Detector KNR Kilonova remnant LAT Large Area Telescope LEO Low Earth Orbit LGRB Long Gamma-Ray Burst LIGO Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory LIV Lorentz Invariance Violation LSST Large Synoptic Survey Telescope LVC The LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration LISA Laser Interferometer Space Antenna NIR Near infrared MAGIC Major Atmospheric Gamma Imaging Cherenkov Telescopes MCMC Markov Chain Monte Carlo MW Milky Way NS Neutron Star NSBH Neutron Star–Black Hole PPN Parametrized Post-Newtonian PTA Pulsar Timing Arrays QCD Quantum Chromodynamics QFT Quantum Field Theory QG Quantum Gravity 123 Neutron star mergers and how to study them RAVEN Rapid VOEvent Coincidence Monitor SAA South Atlantic Anomaly SFR Star Formation Rate SGRB Short Gamma-Ray Burst SMBH SuperMassive Black Hole SMNS Supramassive Neutron Star SNR Signal-to-Noise Ratio SME Standard Model Extension SNe Supernova explosion SNEWS Supernova Early Warning System SPI-ACS SPectrometer onboard INTEGRAL-Anti-Coincidence Shield SR Special Relativity SSC Synchrotron Self Compton TOV Tolman–Oppenheimer–Volkoff TTE Time-Tagged Event UHECR Ultra-High Energy Cosmic Ray UV Ultraviolet UVOIR Ultraviolet, Optical, and Infrared UVOT Ultraviolet/Optical Telescope VHE Very High Energy WEP Weak Equivalence Principle XRT X-ray telescope ZTF Zwicky Transient Facility Contents 1 Introduction............................................................................................................................... 2 Neutron star mergers................................................................................................................ 2.1 Overview.......................................................................................................................... 2.1.1 System formation .............................................................................................. 2.1.2 Inspiral ............................................................................................................... 2.1.3 Merger................................................................................................................ 2.1.4 Jets ..................................................................................................................... 2.1.5 Quasi-isotropic outflows ................................................................................... 2.1.6 Aftermath........................................................................................................... 2.2 Intrinsic event rates ........................................................................................................... 2.3 Gravitational waves ........................................................................................................... 2.4 Prompt gamma-ray bursts ................................................................................................. 2.5 Statistical association and joint searches.......................................................................... 2.6 Joint GW-GRB detection rates ......................................................................................... 2.7 Follow-up searches ............................................................................................................ 2.8 Gamma-ray burst afterglows ............................................................................................. 2.9 Kilonovae ........................................................................................................................... 2.10 Other signatures ................................................................................................................. 2.10.1 MeV neutrinos................................................................................................... 123 E. Burns 2.10.2 Other observed non-thermal signatures............................................................ 2.10.3 High-energy neutrinos....................................................................................... 2.10.4 Very-high energy electromagnetic detections.................................................. 2.10.5 Neutron precursors to kilonova and additional energy injection .................... 2.10.6 Late-time radio emission .................................................................................. 2.10.7 Gamma-ray detections of prompt kilonova and kilonova remnants ............... 2.11 Detections summary .......................................................................................................... 3 Astrophysical inferences ............................................................................................................ 3.1 Progenitor classification and the existence of neutron star–black hole systems ............ 3.2 The immediate remnant object in binary neutron star mergers....................................... 3.3 The time delay from merger to prompt gamma-ray burst emission ............................... 3.4 The origin of early ultraviolet emission ........................................................................... 3.5 Host galaxy, redshift, and where neutron star mergers occur ......................................... 4 Short gamma-ray bursts and ultrarelativistic jets...................................................................... 4.1 The progenitors of gamma-gay bursts .............................................................................. 4.2 The central engines of short gamma-ray bursts ............................................................... 4.3 Ultrarelativistic jet formation............................................................................................ 4.4 Propagation and structure.................................................................................................. 4.5 Gamma-ray burst jet composition and ultra high energy cosmic rays ........................... 4.6 The prompt emission mechanism(s) of gamma-ray bursts .............................................. 4.7 The origin of other non-thermal signatures...................................................................... 4.7.1 Short gamma-ray burst precursors.................................................................... 4.7.2 Extended emission and X-ray plateaus ............................................................ 4.7.3 X-ray flares in the afterglow ............................................................................ 4.7.4 Synchrotron self Compton ................................................................................ 5 Kilonovae and the origin of heavy elements ............................................................................ 5.1 Heavy element production in candidate r-process sites................................................... 5.2 On-going heavy element nucleosynthesis in the Milky Way.......................................... 5.3 The heavy element enrichment history of the Universe.................................................. 6 Standard sirens and cosmology.................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Atomic Interferometric Gravitational-Wave Space Observatory (AIGSO)
    Atomic Interferometric Gravitational-wave Space Observatory (AIGSO) Dongfeng Gao1,2,,∗ Jin Wang1,2, and Mingsheng Zhan1,2,† 1 State Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance and Atomic and Molecular Physics, Wuhan Institute of Physics and Mathematics, Chinese Academy of Sciences - Wuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics, Wuhan 430071, China 2 Center for Cold Atom Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430071, China (Dated: January 17, 2018) We propose a space-borne gravitational-wave detection scheme, called atom interferometric gravitational-wave space observatory (AIGSO). It is motivated by the progress in the atomic matter- wave interferometry, which solely utilizes the standing light waves to split, deflect and recombine the atomic beam. Our scheme consists of three drag-free satellites orbiting the Earth. The phase shift of AIGSO is dominated by the Sagnac effect of gravitational-waves, which is proportional to the area enclosed by the atom interferometer, the frequency and amplitude of gravitational-waves. The scheme has a strain sensitivity < 10−20/√Hz in the 100 mHz-10 Hz frequency range, which fills in the detection gap between space-based and ground-based laser interferometric detectors. Thus, our proposed AIGSO can be a good complementary detection scheme to the space-borne laser inter- ferometric schemes, such as LISA. Considering the current status of relevant technology readiness, we expect our AIGSO to be a promising candidate for the future space-based gravitational-wave detection plan. Keywords: Gravitational waves, Atomic Sagnac interferometer, Space-borne detector arXiv:1711.03690v2 [physics.atom-ph] 16 Jan 2018 ∗ [email protected] † [email protected] 2 I. INTRODUCTION An important prediction of Einstein’s theory of general relativity is the existence of gravitational waves (GWs).
    [Show full text]
  • Pos(MULTIF2017)001
    Multifrequency Astrophysics (A pillar of an interdisciplinary approach for the knowledge of the physics of our Universe) ∗† Franco Giovannelli PoS(MULTIF2017)001 INAF - Istituto di Astrofisica e Planetologia Spaziali, Via del Fosso del Cavaliere, 100, 00133 Roma, Italy E-mail: [email protected] Lola Sabau-Graziati INTA- Dpt. Cargas Utiles y Ciencias del Espacio, C/ra de Ajalvir, Km 4 - E28850 Torrejón de Ardoz, Madrid, Spain E-mail: [email protected] We will discuss the importance of the "Multifrequency Astrophysics" as a pillar of an interdis- ciplinary approach for the knowledge of the physics of our Universe. Indeed, as largely demon- strated in the last decades, only with the multifrequency observations of cosmic sources it is possible to get near the whole behaviour of a source and then to approach the physics governing the phenomena that originate such a behaviour. In spite of this, a multidisciplinary approach in the study of each kind of phenomenon occurring in each kind of cosmic source is even more pow- erful than a simple "astrophysical approach". A clear example of a multidisciplinary approach is that of "The Bridge between the Big Bang and Biology". This bridge can be described by using the competences of astrophysicists, planetary physicists, atmospheric physicists, geophysicists, volcanologists, biophysicists, biochemists, and astrobiophysicists. The unification of such com- petences can provide the intellectual framework that will better enable an understanding of the physics governing the formation and structure of cosmic objects, apparently uncorrelated with one another, that on the contrary constitute the steps necessary for life (e.g. Giovannelli, 2001).
    [Show full text]
  • Science Olympiad Astronomy C Division Event University of Chicago Invitational
    Science Olympiad Astronomy C Division Event University of Chicago Invitational University of Chicago Chicago, IL January 11, 2020 Team Number: Team Name: Instructions: 1) Please turn in all materials at the end of the event. 2) Do not forget to put your team name and team number at the top of all answer pages. 3) Write all answers on the lines on the answer pages. Any marks elsewhere will not be scored. 4) Do not worry about significant figures. Use 3 or more in your answers, regardless of how many are in the question. 5) Please do not access the internet during the event. If you do so, your team will be disqualified. 6) Feel free to take apart the test and staple it back together at the end! 7) Good luck! And may the stars be with you! 1 Section A: Use the Image/Illustration Set to answer the following questions. Each sub-question in this section is worth one point. 1. Image 1 shows the Bullet Cluster. (a) What part of the electromagnetic spectrum was this image taken in? (b) What do the blue regions correspond to? (c) How was the matter in the blue regions detected? (d) Which other image shows this cluster? 2. Image 2 shows part of M87. (a) What part of M87 does this image show? (b) What part of the electromagnetic spectrum was this image taken in? (c) Which image shows a zoomed-in radio observation of this region? (d) What type of astronomical object is shown in the image from part (c)? 3.
    [Show full text]
  • GW190814: Gravitational Waves from the Coalescence of a 23 M Black Hole 4 with a 2.6 M Compact Object
    1 Draft version May 21, 2020 2 Typeset using LATEX twocolumn style in AASTeX63 3 GW190814: Gravitational Waves from the Coalescence of a 23 M Black Hole 4 with a 2.6 M Compact Object 5 LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration 6 7 (Dated: May 21, 2020) 8 ABSTRACT 9 We report the observation of a compact binary coalescence involving a 22.2 { 24.3 M black hole and 10 a compact object with a mass of 2.50 { 2.67 M (all measurements quoted at the 90% credible level). 11 The gravitational-wave signal, GW190814, was observed during LIGO's and Virgo's third observing 12 run on August 14, 2019 at 21:10:39 UTC and has a signal-to-noise ratio of 25 in the three-detector 2 +41 13 network. The source was localized to 18.5 deg at a distance of 241−45 Mpc; no electromagnetic 14 counterpart has been confirmed to date. The source has the most unequal mass ratio yet measured +0:008 15 with gravitational waves, 0:112−0:009, and its secondary component is either the lightest black hole 16 or the heaviest neutron star ever discovered in a double compact-object system. The dimensionless 17 spin of the primary black hole is tightly constrained to 0:07. Tests of general relativity reveal no ≤ 18 measurable deviations from the theory, and its prediction of higher-multipole emission is confirmed at −3 −1 19 high confidence. We estimate a merger rate density of 1{23 Gpc yr for the new class of binary 20 coalescence sources that GW190814 represents.
    [Show full text]
  • Atom Interferometry in an Optical Cavity by Matthew Jaffe a Dissertation Submitted in Partial Satisfaction of the Requirements F
    Atom interferometry in an optical cavity by Matthew Jaffe A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Physics in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Associate Professor Holger Müller, Chair Associate Professor Norman Yao Professor Karl van Bibber Fall 2018 Atom interferometry in an optical cavity Copyright 2018 by Matthew Jaffe 1 Abstract Atom interferometry in an optical cavity by Matthew Jaffe Doctor of Philosophy in Physics University of California, Berkeley Associate Professor Holger Müller, Chair Matter wave interferometry with laser pulses has become a powerful tool for precision measurement. Optical resonators, meanwhile, are an indispensable tool for control of laser beams. We have combined these two components, and built the first atom interferometer inside of an optical cavity. This apparatus was then used to examine interactions between atoms and a small, in-vacuum source mass. We measured the gravitational attraction to the source mass, making it the smallest source body ever probed gravitationally with an atom interferometer. Searching for additional forces due to screened fields, we tightened constraints on certain dark energy models by several orders of magnitude. Finally, we measured a novel force mediated by blackbody radiation for the first time. Utilizing technical benefits of the cavity, we performed interferometry with adiabatic passage. This enabled new interferometer geometries, large momentum transfer, and in- terferometers with up to one hundred pulses. Performing a trapped interferometer to take advantage of the clean wavefronts within the optical cavity, we performed the longest du- ration spatially-separated atom interferometer to date: over ten seconds, after which the atomic wavefunction was coherently recombined and read out as interference to measure gravity.
    [Show full text]
  • Probing the Nuclear Equation of State from the Existence of a 2.6 M Neutron Star: the GW190814 Puzzle
    S S symmetry Article Probing the Nuclear Equation of State from the Existence of a ∼2.6 M Neutron Star: The GW190814 Puzzle Alkiviadis Kanakis-Pegios †,‡ , Polychronis S. Koliogiannis ∗,†,‡ and Charalampos C. Moustakidis †,‡ Department of Theoretical Physics, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece; [email protected] (A.K.P.); [email protected] (C.C.M.) * Correspondence: [email protected] † Current address: Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece. ‡ These authors contributed equally to this work. Abstract: On 14 August 2019, the LIGO/Virgo collaboration observed a compact object with mass +0.08 2.59 0.09 M , as a component of a system where the main companion was a black hole with mass ∼ − 23 M . A scientific debate initiated concerning the identification of the low mass component, as ∼ it falls into the neutron star–black hole mass gap. The understanding of the nature of GW190814 event will offer rich information concerning open issues, the speed of sound and the possible phase transition into other degrees of freedom. In the present work, we made an effort to probe the nuclear equation of state along with the GW190814 event. Firstly, we examine possible constraints on the nuclear equation of state inferred from the consideration that the low mass companion is a slow or rapidly rotating neutron star. In this case, the role of the upper bounds on the speed of sound is revealed, in connection with the dense nuclear matter properties. Secondly, we systematically study the tidal deformability of a possible high mass candidate existing as an individual star or as a component one in a binary neutron star system.
    [Show full text]
  • LIST of PUBLICATIONS Aryabhatta Research Institute of Observational Sciences ARIES (An Autonomous Scientific Research Institute
    LIST OF PUBLICATIONS Aryabhatta Research Institute of Observational Sciences ARIES (An Autonomous Scientific Research Institute of Department of Science and Technology, Govt. of India) Manora Peak, Naini Tal - 263 129, India (1955−2020) ABBREVIATIONS AA: Astronomy and Astrophysics AASS: Astronomy and Astrophysics Supplement Series ACTA: Acta Astronomica AJ: Astronomical Journal ANG: Annals de Geophysique Ap. J.: Astrophysical Journal ASP: Astronomical Society of Pacific ASR: Advances in Space Research ASS: Astrophysics and Space Science AE: Atmospheric Environment ASL: Atmospheric Science Letters BA: Baltic Astronomy BAC: Bulletin Astronomical Institute of Czechoslovakia BASI: Bulletin of the Astronomical Society of India BIVS: Bulletin of the Indian Vacuum Society BNIS: Bulletin of National Institute of Sciences CJAA: Chinese Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics CS: Current Science EPS: Earth Planets Space GRL : Geophysical Research Letters IAU: International Astronomical Union IBVS: Information Bulletin on Variable Stars IJHS: Indian Journal of History of Science IJPAP: Indian Journal of Pure and Applied Physics IJRSP: Indian Journal of Radio and Space Physics INSA: Indian National Science Academy JAA: Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy JAMC: Journal of Applied Meterology and Climatology JATP: Journal of Atmospheric and Terrestrial Physics JBAA: Journal of British Astronomical Association JCAP: Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics JESS : Jr. of Earth System Science JGR : Journal of Geophysical Research JIGR: Journal of Indian
    [Show full text]
  • Gravitational Waves and Gamma-Rays from a Binary Neutron Star Merger: Gw170817 and Grb 170817A
    Draft version October 15, 2017 Typeset using LATEX twocolumn style in AASTeX61 GRAVITATIONAL WAVES AND GAMMA-RAYS FROM A BINARY NEUTRON STAR MERGER: GW170817 AND GRB 170817A B. P. Abbott,1 R. Abbott,1 T. D. Abbott,2 F. Acernese,3, 4 K. Ackley,5, 6 C. Adams,7 T. Adams,8 P. Addesso,9 R. X. Adhikari,1 V. B. Adya,10 C. Affeldt,10 M. Afrough,11 B. Agarwal,12 M. Agathos,13 K. Agatsuma,14 N. Aggarwal,15 O. D. Aguiar,16 L. Aiello,17, 18 A. Ain,19 P. Ajith,20 B. Allen,10, 21, 22 G. Allen,12 A. Allocca,23, 24 M. A. Aloy,25 P. A. Altin,26 A. Amato,27 A. Ananyeva,1 S. B. Anderson,1 W. G. Anderson,21 S. V. Angelova,28 S. Antier,29 S. Appert,1 K. Arai,1 M. C. Araya,1 J. S. Areeda,30 N. Arnaud,29, 31 K. G. Arun,32 S. Ascenzi,33, 34 G. Ashton,10 M. Ast,35 S. M. Aston,7 P. Astone,36 D. V. Atallah,37 P. Aufmuth,22 C. Aulbert,10 K. AultONeal,38 C. Austin,2 A. Avila-Alvarez,30 S. Babak,39 P. Bacon,40 M. K. M. Bader,14 S. Bae,41 P. T. Baker,42 F. Baldaccini,43, 44 G. Ballardin,31 S. W. Ballmer,45 S. Banagiri,46 J. C. Barayoga,1 S. E. Barclay,47 B. C. Barish,1 D. Barker,48 K. Barkett,49 F. Barone,3, 4 B. Barr,47 L. Barsotti,15 M. Barsuglia,40 D. Barta,50 J.
    [Show full text]
  • The Study of Astronomical Transients in the Infrared
    The Study of Astronomical Transients in the Infrared by Robert Strausbaugh A Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy Approved May 2019 by the Graduate Supervisory Committee: Nathaniel Butler, Chair Rolf Jansen Phillip Mauskopf Rogier Windhorst ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY August 2019 ©2019 Robert Strausbaugh All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT Several key, open questions in astrophysics can be tackled by searching for and mining large datasets for transient phenomena. The evolution of massive stars and compact objects can be studied over cosmic time by identifying supernovae (SNe) and gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) in other galaxies and determining their redshifts. Modeling GRBs and their afterglows to probe the jets of GRBs can shed light on the emission mechanism, rate, and energetics of these events. In Chapter 1, I discuss the current state of astronomical transient study, including sources of interest, instrumentation, and data reduction techniques, with a focus on work in the infrared. In Chapter 2, I present original work published in the Proceedings of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, testing InGaAs infrared detectors for astronomical use (Strausbaugh, Jackson, and Butler 2018); highlights of this work include observing the exoplanet transit of HD189773B, and detecting the nearby supernova SN2016adj with an InGaAs detector mounted on a small telescope at ASU. In Chapter 3, I discuss my work on GRB jets published in the Astrophysical Journal Letters, highlighting the interesting case of GRB 160625B (Strausbaugh et al. 2019), where I interpret a late-time bump in the GRB afterglow lightcurve as evidence for a bright-edged jet.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1802.07727V1 [Astro-Ph.HE] 21 Feb 2018 Tion Systems to Standard Candles in Cosmology (E.G., Wijers Et Al
    Astronomy & Astrophysics manuscript no. XSGRB_sample_arxiv c ESO 2018 2018-02-23 The X-shooter GRB afterglow legacy sample (XS-GRB)? J. Selsing1;??, D. Malesani1; 2; 3,y, P. Goldoni4,y, J. P. U. Fynbo1; 2,y, T. Krühler5,y, L. A. Antonelli6,y, M. Arabsalmani7; 8, J. Bolmer5; 9,y, Z. Cano10,y, L. Christensen1, S. Covino11,y, P. D’Avanzo11,y, V. D’Elia12,y, A. De Cia13, A. de Ugarte Postigo1; 10,y, H. Flores14,y, M. Friis15; 16, A. Gomboc17, J. Greiner5, P. Groot18, F. Hammer14, O.E. Hartoog19,y, K. E. Heintz1; 2; 20,y, J. Hjorth1,y, P. Jakobsson20,y, J. Japelj19,y, D. A. Kann10,y, L. Kaper19, C. Ledoux9, G. Leloudas1, A.J. Levan21,y, E. Maiorano22, A. Melandri11,y, B. Milvang-Jensen1; 2, E. Palazzi22, J. T. Palmerio23,y, D. A. Perley24,y, E. Pian22, S. Piranomonte6,y, G. Pugliese19,y, R. Sánchez-Ramírez25,y, S. Savaglio26, P. Schady5, S. Schulze27,y, J. Sollerman28, M. Sparre29,y, G. Tagliaferri11, N. R. Tanvir30,y, C. C. Thöne10, S.D. Vergani14,y, P. Vreeswijk18; 26,y, D. Watson1; 2,y, K. Wiersema21; 30,y, R. Wijers19, D. Xu31,y, and T. Zafar32 (Affiliations can be found after the references) Received/ accepted ABSTRACT In this work we present spectra of all γ-ray burst (GRB) afterglows that have been promptly observed with the X-shooter spectrograph until 31=03=2017. In total, we obtained spectroscopic observations of 103 individual GRBs observed within 48 hours of the GRB trigger. Redshifts have been measured for 97 per cent of these, covering a redshift range from 0.059 to 7.84.
    [Show full text]
  • Cold Atom Interferometry Sensors: Physics and Technologies
    Cold atom interferometry sensors: physics and technologies A scientific background for EU policymaking Travagnin, M. 2020 EUR 30289 EN This publication is a Technical report by the Joint Research Centre (JRC), the European Commission’s science and knowledge service. It aims to provide evidence-based scientific support to the European policymaking process. The scientific output expressed does not imply a policy position of the European Commission. Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission is responsible for the use that might be made of this publication. Contact information Name: Martino Travagnin Email: [email protected] EU Science Hub https://ec.europa.eu/jrc JRC121223 EUR 30289 EN PDF ISBN 978-92-76-20405-3 ISSN 1831-9424 doi:10.2760/315209 Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2020 © European Union, 2020 The reuse policy of the European Commission is implemented by Commission Decision 2011/833/EU of 12 December 2011 on the reuse of Commission documents (OJ L 330, 14.12.2011, p. 39). Reuse is authorised, provided the source of the document is acknowledged and its original meaning or message is not distorted. The European Commission shall not be liable for any consequence stemming from the reuse. For any use or reproduction of photos or other material that is not owned by the EU, permission must be sought directly from the copyright holders. All content © European Union, 2020 How to cite this report: M. Travagnin, Cold atom interferometry sensors: physics and technologies. A scientific background for EU policymaking, 2020, EUR 30289 EN, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2020, ISBN 978- 92-76-20405-3, doi:10.2760/315209, JRC121223 Contents Acknowledgements ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring the Hubble Constant with a Sample of Kilonovae
    Measuring the Hubble Constant with a sample of kilonovae Michael W. Coughlin1;2,∗ Sarah Antier3, Tim Dietrich4;5, Ryan J. Foley6, Jack Heinzel7;8, Mattia Bulla9, Nelson Christensen7;8, David A. Coulter6, Lina Issa9;10, and Nandita Khetan11 1School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA 2Division of Physics, Math, and Astronomy, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA 3APC, UMR 7164, 10 rue Alice Domon et Leonie´ Duquet, 75205 Paris, France 4Institut fur¨ Physik und Astronomie, Universitat¨ Potsdam, Haus 28, Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 24/25, 14476, Potsdam, Germany 5Nikhef, Science Park 105, 1098 XG Amsterdam, The Netherlands 6Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA 7Artemis, Universite´ Coteˆ d’Azur, Observatoire Coteˆ d’Azur, CNRS, CS 34229, F-06304 Nice Cedex 4, France 8Physics and Astronomy, Carleton College, Northfield, MN 55057, USA 9Nordita, KTH Royal Institute of Technology and Stockholm University, Roslagstullsbacken 23, arXiv:2008.07420v1 [astro-ph.HE] 17 Aug 2020 SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden 10Universite´ Paris-Saclay, ENS Paris-Saclay, Departement´ de Phyisque, 91190, Gif-sur-Yvette, France. ∗ Corresponding Author: [email protected]. 1 11Gran Sasso Science Institute (GSSI), I-67100 L’Aquila, Italy 1 Abstract Kilonovae produced by the coalescence of compact binaries with at least one neutron star are promising standard sirens for an independent measurement of the Hubble constant (H0). Through their detection via follow-up of gravitational-wave (GW), short gamma-ray bursts (sGRBs) or optical surveys, a large sample of kilonovae (even without GW data) can be used for H0 contraints.
    [Show full text]