SCIENCE and LORE in ANIMAL LAW Maeveen Marie Behan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

SCIENCE and LORE in ANIMAL LAW Maeveen Marie Behan Science and Lore in Animal Law Item Type text; Electronic Dissertation Authors Behan, Maeveen Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 27/09/2021 03:07:56 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/194253 SCIENCE AND LORE IN ANIMAL LAW Maeveen Marie Behan ------------------------------------- Copyright © Maeveen Marie Behan 2006 A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the OFFICE OF ARID LANDS RESOURCE SCIENCES In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 2006 2 THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA GRADUATE COLLEGE As members of the Dissertation Committee, we certify that we have read the dissertation prepared b y Maeveen Behan entitled Science and Lore in Animal Law and recommend that it be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy _______________________________________________________________________ Dat e: October 23, 2006 Dr. Stuart Marsh _______________________________________________________________________ Date: October 23, 2006 Dr. Suzanne Fish _______________________________________________________________________ Date: October 23, 2006 Dr. Joseph Hiller _______________________________________________________________________ Date: October 23, 2006 Dr. Ed de Steiguer _______________________________________________________________________ Date: October 23, 2006 Dr. Thomas Sheridan Final approval and acceptance of this dissertation is contingent upon the candidate’s submission of the final copies of the dissertation to the Graduate College. I hereby certify that I have read this dissertation prepared under my direction an d recommend that it be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement. ________________________________________________ Date: October 23, 2006 Dissertation Director: Dr. Stuart Marsh 3 STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This dissertation has been submitted i n partial fulfillment of requirements for an advanced degree at The University of Arizona and is deposited in the University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library. Brief quotations from this dissertation are allowable without special permission, provided that accurate acknowledgment of source is made. Requests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the copyright holder. SIGNED: ___ Maeveen Behan _____ _____________ 4 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This project was completed with the help of an Arid Lands fellowship, data contributed by NatureServe, advice from Anita Finnell as program coordinator, and the generosity of Committee Members: Dr. Stuart Marsh, Dr. S uzanne Fish, Dr. Joseph Hiller, Dr. J.E. deSteiguer, and Dr. Tom Sheridan. In addition, credit is due to my longtime friends and colleagues: Charles Harrison, for thinking these ideas through with me way back in law school, and Leslie Dierauf, for giving me my start in conservation biology. Finally, it was Gary Nabhan’s work that sent me in the direction of the Arid Lands interdisciplinary program, which it turned out, was the very best place to be. Many thanks to all of you. 5 DEDICATION For Harry 6 TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I. …..……………………………………………….…….…………………….14 1. INTRODUCTION ……………..…………………….…….…………………….14 1.1 Problem Statement and General Approach …….…………..…………………14 1.2 Purpose ………..……………………………………………..….……… …….19 1.3 Methods ……………………………………………………..………………19 PART II. “NOTE THE ETIC” ……………………………………..……………..…22 2. LAWMAKERS AND SCIENTISTS PRIORITIES ……………………………22 2.1 Species Listed as Threatened or Endangered …………………...……………22 2.1.1 Comparing Overall Priorities………………………………..…………...22 2.1.2 Vertebrates ……………………………….……………….………..……25 2.1.3 Invertebrates …………………………………………..……….………35 2.1.4 Comparison of Influences …………………………………………..….39 2.2 Desert Species …………………………………………….……….………….40 2.2.1 Comparing Overall Priorities for Desert Species…..……….…..…….…41 2.2.2 Desert Vertebrates …………………………….….……..………….…43 2.2.3 Desert Invertebrates ………………………………..……………………48 2.2.4 Comparison of Influences ………………………….…………….……50 7 TABLE OF CONTENTS, continued 3. PRIOR ITIES OF THE JUDICIARY ………………………………..……..…52 3.1 Ancestors of American Courts ……………………….…..…………….……56 3.1.1 Law, Science, and Lore, to 1200 …………………..………..…….…...57 3.1.2 Law, Science and Lore, 1200 to 1500 ……………….…………………66 3.1.3 Law, Science and Lore, 1500 to 1700 … ………………………………78 3.1.4 Summary of Ancestors ………………………………………………...86 3.2 Animals in American Courts ……………………….……...………..………89 3.2.1 Law, Science and Lore, to 1900 ……..………….….…………………..93 3.2.2 Law, Science and Lore, 1900 and after …………………..………….…134 3.2.3 Summary of American Animal Law Cases……………….……….…..170 3.3 Endangered Species Cases …………………………………...….…………175 3.3.1 Overview of Cases ……………………………………….……..……..175 3.3.2 Science in Court …………………………………………….….……..185 3.3.3 Sweet Home and Palila: Anima, Animus, Animal ………. .………...193 PART III. “WHILE SEARCHING FOR THE EMIC” ………………..…………202 4. EPISTIME AND IMAGINATION ……………………………..…………….202 4.1 Law is…………………………………………………………………………202 4.2 Conclusion: Across Disciplines, Across Time ………………………….…208 8 APPENDI X A, PRIORITIES ……………………………………….…………..211 APPENDIX B, CASES …………………………………………….……….………230 APPENDIX C, BOOKS ……………………………………..…………………..…264 REFERENCES ………..………………………………………………….………266 9 LIST OF TABLES TABLE 1.1, Delistings Due to Recovery ……………………………..…………………14 TABLE 1.2, Delistings Due to Extinction……………………………………………….15 TABLE 2.1, Average Recovery Priority Set by Scientists ………..……..….…………23 TABLE 2.2, Science and Lawmakers Priorities Compared by Taxon ……..………..…24 TABLE 2.3, Lawmaker Aver age Expenditures Compared by Taxon………..…………25 TABLE 2.4, World Wide Number of Species ………………………………....………25 TABLE 2.5, U.S. Listings of Threatened and Endangered Species…………....………26 TABLE 2.6, Vertebrate / Invertebrate Expenditure Comparison……………...……….27 TABLE 2.7, World Wide Comparison of Vertebrate……………………………………27 TABLE 2.8, Vertebrate Compared: World Wide to Lawmaker Priority………...……28 TABLE 2.9, Fish, Summary of Size and Expenditures…………………………..…….30 TABLE 2.10, Fish, Expenditure Comparison Based on Economic Conflict…….………30 TABLE 2.11, Reptiles, Summary of Size and Expenditures………………….…….…32 TABLE 2.12, Reptiles, Expenditure Comparison Based on Economic Conflict………...32 TABLE 2.13, Mammals, Summary of Size and Expenditures………………….………33 TABLE 2.14, Ma mmals Over 100 Pounds, Expenditures………………….….………33 TABLE 2.15, Mammals 1 to 100 Pounds, Expenditures……..……………………….33 TABLE 2.16, Mammals Less than 1 Pound, Expenditures…………………….………34 TABLE 2.17, Amphibians, Summary of Importance and Expenditures……….….……34 TABLE 2.18, Amphibians, Expenditure Comparison, Economic Conflict…….………35 10 LIST OF TABLES, continued TABLE 2.19, Invertebrate Expenditures Compared by Taxon…………………….…36 TABLE 2.20, Clams, Expenditure Comparison Based on Economic Conflict…….….37 TABLE 2.21, Snails, Expenditure Comparison Based on Economic Conflict..…….…37 TABLE 2.22, Crustaceans, Expenditure Comparison, Economic Conflict…….…..…37 TABLE 2.23, Desert Counties…………………………………………………………41 TABLE 2.24, Desert Species Compared, Recovery Priority……………….. ………….41 TABLE 2.25, Desert Species Compared, Lawmaker Priority………………..…..……42 TABLE 2.26, Desert Species Compared, Economic Conflict…………….……………42 TABLE 2.27, Desert Fish…………………………………………………………..….43 TABLE 2.28, Desert Birds………………………………………………………….…45 TABLE 2 .29, Desert Reptiles……………………………………..………………..…46 TABLE 2.30, Desert Mammals……………………………………..………………...47 TABLE 2.31, Desert Amphibians…………………………….………………….……48 TABLE 2.32, Desert Crustacean…………………………….…………………….……49 TABLE 2.33, Desert Insects………………………………………………… …….…….49 TABLE 2.34, Desert Snails………………………………………….…………….……50 TABLE 3.1, Application of Kellert Categories to Cases ………………………….……92 TABLE 3.2, Dogs, Before 1900………………………………………………..…..…101 TABLE 3.3, Cows, Bulls, Buffalo, Before 1900…………………………………….…105 TABL E 3.4, Horses, Before 1900………………………………………………….….109 11 LIST OF TABLES, continued TABLE 3.5, Pigs, Before 1900………………………………………….……………112 TABLE 3.6, Mules, Before 1900………………………………..……………………113 TABLE 3.7, Sheep, Before 1900………………………….………….………………113 TABLE 3.8, Wil d Mammals, Before 1900…………………….………………………117 TABLE 3.9, Birds, Before 1900…………………………………….…………………121 TABLE 3.10, Fish and Oysters, Before 1900………………………….….……….….122 TABLE 3.11, Bees, Before 1900 ……………………………………….………..……124 TABLE 3.12, Summary of Cases, Before 1900…………………………….…………126 TABLE 3.13, Comparison of Dog Cases, Before and After 1900…………..….….…139 TABLE 3.14, Comparison of Cat Cases to Dog Cases, After 1900……………….....140 TABLE 3.15, Comparison of Cattle Cases, Before and After 1900……………………144 TABLE 3.16 , Comparison of Horse Cases, Before and After 1900…………………147 TABLE 3.17, Comparison of Wild Mammals, Before and After 1900……..….……149 TABLE 3.18, Comparison of Bird Cases, Before and After 1900.…………….….….155 TABLE 3.19, Comparison of Fish Cases, Before and After 1900…………….………156 TABLE 3.20, Science – Animals and Imaginary Creatures ……………………………167 TABLE 3.21, Lore – Animals and Imaginary Creatures ………………………………168 TABLE 3.22, Domestic and Utilitarian Values Summary…………….………..……170 TABLE 3.23, Moralistic and H umanistic Values Summary
Recommended publications
  • Politics 1-6 Commentary 6-7 FORUM Duly Noted 8
    CONTENTS Politics 1-6 Commentary 6-7 FORUM Duly Noted 8 JULY 15, 1974 Vol. X, No. 14 50 CENTS POLITICS: REPORTS islation, but the implementation now under way of the new law's rules is still a controversial topic. COLORADO Daniels, a Denver businessman and part-owner of the Utah Stars basket­ Furthermore, there is some danger ball team, has drawn the bulk of his that the burning issue of the upcoming In only six states this year, incum­ support from state and Denver party Denver congressional race may spill bent governors will face or have faced leaders. Competition between the two over into state politics. A bitter fight serious primary challenges. GOP aspirants perhaps peaked in is expected between U.S. Rep. Patricia In South Dakota and Texas, respec­ Denver June 1 when delegates to the Schroeder (D) and State Rep. Frank tively, Democratic incumbents annihi­ state assembly were chosen. Daniels Southworth. Southworth, president of lated more liberal challengers with sur­ needed a strong showing from his the Denver Board of Education, is an prising ease. In Florida, Gov. Reubin Denver supporters but failed to get outspoken opponent of school busing Askew (D) is expected to have the it. In the pre-meeting acrimony, Den­ and is expected to make it his major same success, but in Oklahoma, the ver GOP Chairman James Aspinal, a issue. The publicity given busing could politi~allife expectancy of Gov. David Daniels backer, denied Denver GOP conceivably complicate the state guber­ Hall (D), embattled by investigations Secretary Mary Hofstra, a Vanderhoof natorial race as well.
    [Show full text]
  • University News, April 9 Students of Boise State University
    Boise State University ScholarWorks Student Newspapers (UP 4.15) University Documents 4-9-1990 University News, April 9 Students of Boise State University Although this file was scanned from the highest-quality microfilm held by Boise State University, it reveals the limitations of the source microfilm. It is possible to perform a text search of much of this material; however, there are sections where the source microfilm was too faint or unreadable to allow for text scanning. For assistance with this collection of student newspapers, please contact Special Collections and Archives at [email protected]. 3 14 18 The scoop on Visit the International An informal chat with candidates for the Song, Food and l the.fiveASBSU presi- ASBSUsenate race Dance Festival dential tickets. -the ( ~ . - --. --.- -. ...... ... Il.NI\T~RSI'"f"·........... - .-.- -. -- -....-. '-- -- -- _.NF.W.S- - -..'- - - Boise State University Volume X 'Issue Twenty-Two Blind student finds her niche in h.orficulture . Debbie Robertson, a BSU fornia, Oklahoma, Washington horticulture student, was named andldaho. MostofRobertson's a "Student of the Month .. in schooling was self-taught be- February by the Mayor's Com- cause she said many of her milteeonEmploying theHaIidi-, teachers were not trained to capped and Older Worker. instruct a student who was visu- Robertson, who was declared ally. impaired. legal Iyblind at age 8,received a Although she dropped out plaque Trom Mayor Dirk of school after eighth grade, Kernpthorne during a luncheon Robertson went on to receive ceremony. her General Education Diploma Robertson, who is the first (GED) at age 16afteraltending blind student to attend the hor- a self-motivated program at the ticulture program, enrolled at Eastern Idaho Vo-Tech Learn- BSU in Sept.
    [Show full text]
  • 1973 NGA Annual Meeting
    Proceedings OF THE NATIONAL GOVERNORS' CONFERENCE 1973 SIXTY-FIFTH ANNUAL MEETING DEL WEBB'S SAHARA TAHOE. LAKE TAHOE, NEVADA JUNE 3-61973 THE NATIONAL GOVERNORS' CONFERENCE IRON WORKS PIKE LEXINGTON, KENTUCKY 40511 Published by THE NATIONAL GOVERNORS' CONFERENCE IRON WORKS PIKE LEXINGTON, KENTUCKY 40511 CONTENTS Executive Committee Rosters . vi Other Committees of the Conference vii Governors and Guest Speakers in Attendance ix Program of the Annual Meeting . xi Monday Session, June 4 Welcoming Remarks-Governor Mike O'Callaghan 2 Address of the Chairman-Governor Marvin Mandel 2 Adoption of Rules of Procedure 4 "Meet the Governors" . 5 David S. Broder Lawrence E. Spivak Elie Abel James J. Kilpatrick Tuesday Session, June 5 "Developing Energy Policy: State, Regional and National" 46 Remarks of Frank Ikard . 46 Remarks of S. David Freeman 52 Remarks of Governor Tom McCall, Chairman, Western Governors' Conference 58 Remarks of Governor Thomas J. Meskill, Chairman, New England Governors' Conference . 59 Remarks of Governor Robert D. Ray, Chairman, Midwestern Governors' Conference 61 Remarks of Governor Milton J. Shapp, Vice-Chairman, Mid-Atlantic Governors' Conference . 61 Remarks of Governor George C. Wallace, Chairman, Southern Governors' Conference 63 Statement by the Committee on Natural Resources and Environmental Management, presented by Governor Stanley K. Hathaway 65 Discussion by the Governors . 67 "Education Finance: Challenge to the States" 81 Remarks of John E. Coons . 81 Remarks of Governor Wendell R. Anderson 85 Remarks of Governor Tom McCall 87 Remarks of Governor William G. Milliken 88 iii Remarks of Governor Calvin L. Rampton 89 Discussion by the Governors . 91 "New Directions in Welfare and Social Services" 97 Remarks by Frank Carlucci 97 Discussion by the Governors .
    [Show full text]
  • Hell No, We Won't Go
    RIPON SEPTEMBER, 1971 VOL. VII, No. 11 ONE DOLLAR THE LINDSAY SWITCH Hell No, We Won't Go ALSO THIS MONTH: • A Preview of the 1972 Senate Races • A Guide to the Democrats -Partll Clifford Brown • The GOP McGovern Commission • The Learned Man's RaRerty John McClaughry THE RIPON SOCIETY INC is ~ Republican research and SUMMARY OF CONTENTS I • policy organization whose members are young business, academic and professional men and women. It has national headquarters In Cambridge, Massachusetts, THE LINDSAY SWITCH chapters in thirteen cities, National Associate members throughout the fifty states, and several affiliated groups of subchapter status. The Society is supported by chapter dues, individual contribu­ A reprint of the Ripon Society's statement at a news tions and revenues from its publications and contract work. The conference the day following John Lindsay's registration SOciety offers the following options for annual contribution: Con­ as a Democrat. As we've said before, Ripon would rather trtbutor $25 or more; Sustainer $100 or more; Founder $1000 or fight than switch. -S more. Inquiries about membership and chapter organization should be addressed to the National Executive Director. NATIONAL GOVERNING BOARD Officers 'Howard F. Gillette, Jr., President 'Josiah Lee Auspitz, Chairman 01 the Executive Committee 'lioward L. Reiter, Vice President EDITORIAL POINTS "Robert L. Beal. Treasurer Ripon advises President Nixon that he can safely 'R. Quincy White, Jr., Secretary Boston Philadelphia ignore the recent conservative "suspension of support." 'Martha Reardon 'Richard R. Block Also Ripon urges reform of the delegate selection process Martin A. LInsky Rohert J. Moss for the '72 national convention.
    [Show full text]
  • Democratic Planning Group
    Correspondence – Democratic Planning Group Folder Citation: Collection: Records of the 1976 Campaign Committee to Elect Jimmy Carter; Series: Noel Sterrett Subject File; Folder: Correspondence – Democratic Planning Group; Container 77 To See Complete Finding Aid: http://www.jimmycarterlibrary.gov/library/findingaids/Carter-Mondale%20Campaign_1976.pdf DPG 11/1/74 "Advice to Democrats" from Lawrence F. O'Brien NY Times, 10/19/74 "Although party reform has not been a bed of roses for the Democrats, the Republican party has failed to engage in a comparable effort to achieve openness and to democratize its procedures. To date, there is no discernible element of reform within the Republican party and, in the political climate of Watergate, to maintain an attitude of politics-as­ usual is to court disaster ... "As a result of the (Democratic) party's new nominating procedures, we are now reasonably assured that our national convention will be truly democratic. I am inclined to believe that its very openness wi'll be extremely helpful in achieving the unity vital to success in 1976." "The Parties May Be Over" by David Broder Washington Pos�l0/74 " ... a series of studies by Jack Dennis, a political science professor at the University of Wisconsin, indicates... the ·erosion of popular support for the two-party system ... " ... three-fourths or more of the Wisconsin residents agreed that 'the parties do more to confuse the issues than to provide a clear choice on the issues' ... four out of five Wisconsin voters agreed that 'more often than not, the political parties create conflicts where none really exist' ... " ...When asked in 1964 if they believed 'it would be better if, in all elections, we put no party labels on the ballot,' 67% of Wisconsin voters disagreed ..
    [Show full text]
  • 19-04-HR Haldeman Political File
    Richard Nixon Presidential Library Contested Materials Collection Folder List Box Number Folder Number Document Date No Date Subject Document Type Document Description 19 4 Campaign Other Document From: Harry S. Dent RE: Profiles on each state regarding the primary results for elections. 71 pgs. Monday, March 21, 2011 Page 1 of 1 - Democratic Primary - May 5 111E Y~'ilIIE HUUSE GOP Convention - July 17 Primary Results -- --~ -~ ------- NAME party anncd fiJ cd bi.lc!<ground GOVERNORIS RACE George Wallace D 2/26 x beat inc Albert Brewer in runoff ­ former Gov.; 68 PRES cando A. C. Shelton IND 6/6 former St. Sen. Dr. Peter Ca:;;hin NDPA endorsed by the Negro Democratic party in Aiabama NO SENATE RACE CONGRESSIONAL 1st - Jack Edwards INC R x x B. H. Mathis D x x 2nd - B ill Dickenson INC R x x A Ibert Winfield D x x 3rd -G eorge Andrews INC D x x 4th - Bi11 Nichols INC D x x . G len Andrews R 5th -W alter Flowers INC D x x 6th - John Buchanan INC R x x Jack Schmarkey D x x defeated T ito Howard in primary 7th - To m Bevill INC D x x defeated M rs. Frank Stewart in prim 8th - Bob Jones INC D x x ALASKA Filing Date - June 1 Primary - August 25 Primary Re sults NAME party anned filed bacl,ground GOVERNOR1S RACE Keith Miller INC R 4/22 appt to fill Hickel term William Egan D former . Governor SENATE RACE Theodore Stevens INC R 3/21 appt to fill Bartlett term St.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 •.' .{:~Usj$);' Aqri.Cu: ;~; :L:.'Tii~:L:;:~)~~! ~W}.J' ~I~."
    112!/19/ 92 18 : 4d This document is from the collections at the Dole Archives, University of Kansas 2 SENATE~ 313162648446;# 2 SENT av: : 10-1~-9http://dolearchives.ku.edu2:26PM ; KEMPTHORNE fOLITICAL NOTgS l. The Democrat running for this Senate seat is the incumbent Congresaman in Idaho House District 2, Richard Stallings. He was on the ·House Ag committee and has given a good "appearance .. to aq groups over the years. This is the case even thouqh this is generally Republican territory. His voting record does have some flaws as noted on ~he :. ; e~c . ;Lpse~ ; 1 t>-eet. 2 •.' .{ :~usj$);' aqri.cu: ; ~; :l: .'tii~:l:;:~)~ ~ !~~w}.J' ~i~ ." . :.: · ~ ·J.~• " ,:, NAF,~A; .. -.:.. ~ .·. ~ ! !t ~~.r~l); ~.:*9 \:•ugar beet ·g:rowing area .., Sta.1J.. 1,ngs vot~fi : ~I ., · ~t , ~ f'{.. ~ ti : :t:J.~r ~ .: and ie against NAFTA. The . .. , sugar.: indust.~i : otftn. Wi$i(!i:Hi•i.a&a:1 l't·· NAFTA. Kempthorna has, to this point, stayed with the "I am reviewing the detail~ to see what it will do for Idaho." Several of the ag commodity groups are getting concerned about what it will do either directly with their commodity or indirectly by displacing the 200,000 acres of sugar beets to another crop. Also, the wheat and barley producers feel there were issues such as product transparency and tr~naportation subsidies that were left unresolved in CFTA and have been left out of NAFTA and GATT. B. Drought - what that means and what amounts will be available through the disaster programs. The Democrat has made a point of when the President made available the disaster money and how little that is compared to the naed nationally.
    [Show full text]
  • Hiring Government Leaders
    Hiring Government Leaders LESSONS FROM THE PRIVATE SECTOR GEOFF SMART, MARIA BLAIR, AND JEFF MCLEAN NOVEMBER 2020 AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH Executive Summary electing the individuals to build a president’s our experience working as advisers across five cabinet Scabinet and lead executive agencies is one of the and senior staff selection processes for several sitting biggest challenges facing a newly elected president governors have demonstrated a more robust approach and likely one of the most important sets of deci- to selecting cabinet leaders and senior administration sions the president will make in his or her presidency. staff. The keys to successful selection are figuring out Cabinet structure and candidate selection will set the what you want the person to do on the job, generat- stage for how the president will formulate his or her ing a list of candidates, collecting valid and reliable agenda, implement policies, lead millions of federal data to be able to select a person who has at least a workers, and effectively govern the country. 90 percent chance of performing the role successfully, Our half century of research in industrial and orga- and convincing the person to accept the job offer. We nizational psychology; our over 25 years of professional illustrate how each step can be used in senior govern- practice in assessing tens of thousands of candidates ment hiring and suggest how it can be implemented for hiring, primarily in large private-sector organiza- through straightforward process changes. tions but also large not-for-profit organizations; and 1 Hiring Government Leaders LESSONS FROM THE PRIVATE SECTOR Geoff Smart, Maria Blair, and Jeff McLean electing a senior leadership team is a president’s historical perspective, combine scholarly research Sfirst priority.
    [Show full text]
  • Whpr19750404-009
    Digitized from Box 9 of the White House Press Releases at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE APRIL 4, 1975 OFFICE OF THE WHITE HOUSE PRESS SECRETARY (San Francisco, California) THE WHITE HOUSE PRESS CONFERENCE OF CALVIN L. RAMPTON GOVERNOR FROM THE STATE OF UTAH MIKE O'CALLAGHAN GOVERNOR FROM THE STATE': OF NEVADA DANIEL J. EVANS GOVERNOR FROM THE STATE OF WASHINGTON AND RON NESSEN PRESS SECRETARY TO THE PRESIDENT ST. FRANCIS HOTEL 5:20 P.M. PDT MR. NESSEN: As we have done after previous Governors meetingswith the President, we have brought some of the Governors to talk to you and to give you an idea of how the meeting went. I think you have a list of the attendees. Let me say, before I introduce the Governors, that the format of this was the President I guess listened 90 percent of the time as the various Governors expressed the problems that were bothering them in their states. These problems included the economy, energy, the environment, farm problems, highways, food stamps and housing. As you know -- those of you who are in the pool former Governor Hathaway was there and attended the lunch. At one point during the lunch, Governor Andrus of Idaho expressed support for the nomination, and said he thought most of the other Western Governors suppert it and, in fact, would come and testify on behalf of former Governor Hathaway. With that, I will let the Governors tell you themselves what they discussed with the President. We have Governor Rampton of Utah, who is the Chairman of the National Governors Conference.
    [Show full text]
  • High Country News Vol. 20.2, Feb 1, 1988
    A Paper for People 'who Care about the West Idaho's potato king Proposes 100 power plants he sound of jaws drop- thereby bypassing the lock elec- 1 - ping could be heard tric utilities such as Pacific Power Tthroughout Idaho after and Light and. Utah Power and the state's richest man, indus- Light have on transmission. trialist J .R. Simplot, announced At the time, however, the in late December that he wants firm did not mention a fleet of to build 100 coal-fired power coal-fired plants. But,even with- plants along the Snake River over out the coal plants, southern the next 50years. California utilities have never Simplot said he hoped to indicated they are interested in begin building two 1,000. purchasing power from Idaho. megawatt plants a year starting In addition to doubts about in the 1990s, turning Idaho into the market for huge amounts of an energy farm for the Sourwest, electricity, there is also a ques- . "You try to project this' out 50 . tion about Simpler's ability to years and you get something. so convince Idaho to accept the big you can't imagine;" Simplot plants. Bruce Bowler, a Boise told an Idaho Statesman reporter, attorney and environmentalist, "(In) 5Qyears, we would have a said, "I think it's insane ... In hundred .. a hundred .. 1,000. today's context of things, (Sirn- megawatt plants in Idaho on this plot's plan) is so completely river. " incredible for so many reasons I Simplot, the self-made billion- can't cite them all." . aire who heads a world-wide A major obstacle is water.
    [Show full text]
  • Agreement to Implement U.S
    AGREEMENT TO IMPLEMENT U.S. DISTRICT COURT ORDER DATED MAY 25, 2006 The Parties to this Agreement are the United States Department of Energy (“DOE”), the United States Navy, Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program (“Navy”)1 and the State of Idaho (by and through the Governor of the State of Idaho, C.L. “Butch” Otter, and the Idaho Attorney General, Lawrence G. Wasden) and the Governor of the State of Idaho, C.L. “Butch” Otter, individually in his official capacity (collectively “Idaho”). The Parties hereto enter this Agreement in full and final settlement of the current dispute between the Parties in the matter entitled Public Service Company of Colorado v. Batt, CV-91-0035-S-EJL and CV 91-0054-S-EJL2, regarding the interpretation of Paragraph B.1 of the October 17, 1995 Settlement Agreement and Consent Order which is attached hereto as Appendix A. I. DEFINITIONS A. “1995 Settlement Agreement” shall mean the October 17, 1995 Settlement Agreement and Consent Order in the matter entitled Public Service Company of Colorado v. Batt, CV-91-0035-S-EJL and CV 91-0054-S-EJL. B. “741 Sludge” shall mean waste identified as 741 Sludge in the Waste Information Location Database (WILD) or otherwise having characteristics substantially similar to such waste. C. “742 Sludge” shall mean waste identified as 742 Sludge in the Waste Information Location Database (WILD) or otherwise having characteristics substantially similar to such waste. D. “743 Sludge” shall mean waste identified as 743 Sludge in the Waste Information Location Database (WILD) or otherwise having characteristics substantially similar to such waste.
    [Show full text]
  • THE DEMOCRATIC and REPUBLICAN GOVERNORS ASSOCIATIONS and the NATIONALIZATION of AMERICAN PARTY POLITICS Anthony Sparacino Doctor
    THE DEMOCRATIC AND REPUBLICAN GOVERNORS ASSOCIATIONS AND THE NATIONALIZATION OF AMERICAN PARTY POLITICS Anthony Sparacino Doctoral Candidate The Woodrow Wilson Department of Politics University of Virginia [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements 3 List of Tables and Figures 4 Introduction: Governors in a Nationalized Party System 5 Chapter 1: A Theory of National Gubernatorial Party Organizations 25 Chapter 2: Governors and National Politics Before the National Gubernatorial Party Organizations 54 Chapter 3: Beyond a Decentralized Party System: Origins of the Republican Governors Association, 1960-1968 91 Chapter 4: The Republican Governors Association in a Nationalizing Party System, 1969-1980 134 Chapter 5: Republican Governors as National Programmatic Partisans, 1981-2000 179 Chapter 6: The Seeds and Stunted Development of the Democratic Governors Conference, 1961- 1980 226 Chapter 7: The Democrats Catch Up: The DGA and the Integration of the Democratic Party, 1981-2000 279 Conclusion: Partisan Governors Associations in a Polarized Era, 2000-Present 325 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This project would not have been possible save for a tremendous amount of support, encouragement, and feedback. First, I wish to thank my family. Dad’s interest in politics inspired my own from an early age. Mom always was willing to listen and offer support and encouragement. Both of them provided reassurance in my decision to attend graduate school and were there for me every step of the way. Second, I wish to thank my outstanding dissertation committee. Sidney Milkis, James Ceaser and James Savage have been outstanding, compassionate, and able advisors and have offered more support and inspiration, through their scholarship and personal interactions with me, than I could have ever expected or hoped for.
    [Show full text]