FCC-16-107A1.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

FCC-16-107A1.Pdf Federal Communications Commission FCC 16-107 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) 2014 Quadrennial Regulatory Review – Review of ) MB Docket No. 14-50 the Commission’s Broadcast Ownership Rules and ) Other Rules Adopted Pursuant to Section 202 of ) the Telecommunications Act of 1996 ) ) 2010 Quadrennial Regulatory Review – Review of ) MB Docket No. 09-182 the Commission’s Broadcast Ownership Rules and ) Other Rules Adopted Pursuant to Section 202 of ) the Telecommunications Act of 1996 ) ) Promoting Diversification of Ownership ) MB Docket No. 07-294 In the Broadcasting Services ) ) Rules and Policies Concerning Attribution of Joint ) MB Docket No. 04-256 Sales Agreements in Local Television Markets ) ) SECOND REPORT AND ORDER Adopted: August 10, 2016 Released: August 25, 2016 By the Commission: Commissioner Clyburn issuing a statement; Commissioners Pai and O’Rielly dissenting and issuing separate statements. TABLE OF CONTENTS Heading Paragraph # I. INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................................. 1 II. BACKGROUND.................................................................................................................................... 6 III. MEDIA OWNERSHIP RULES ........................................................................................................... 17 A. Local Television Ownership Rule.................................................................................................. 17 B. Local Radio Ownership Rule......................................................................................................... 82 C. Newspaper/Broadcast Cross-Ownership Rule ............................................................................. 129 D. Radio/Television Cross-Ownership Rule..................................................................................... 198 E. Dual Network Rule ...................................................................................................................... 216 IV. DIVERSITY ORDER REMAND....................................................................................................... 234 A. Commission Diversity Initiatives and Data Collection Efforts.................................................... 237 B. Remand Review of the Revenue-Based Eligible Entity Standard ............................................... 271 C. Remand Review of a Race- or Gender-Conscious Eligible Entity Standard ............................... 287 D. Additional Proposals Related to Minority and Female Ownership.............................................. 317 V. SHARED SERVICE AGREEMENTS ................................................................................................ 337 A. Introduction.................................................................................................................................. 337 B. Background .................................................................................................................................. 339 C. Discussion.................................................................................................................................... 341 VI. PROCEDURAL MATTERS .............................................................................................................. 378 VII. ORDERING CLAUSES.................................................................................................................... 381 Federal Communications Commission FCC 16-107 APPENDIX A - Final Rule Changes APPENDIX B - Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis I. INTRODUCTION 1. With this Second Report and Order (Order), we bring to a close the 2010 and 2014 Quadrennial Review proceedings.1 In this Order, we maintain strong media ownership rules, take steps to help promote small business participation in the broadcast industry, and adopt rules that will help to promote transparency in local television markets. The Commission has built a substantial record that evidences both the existence of a dynamic media marketplace and the continuing importance of traditional media outlets in their local communities. We recognize that broadband Internet and other technological advances have changed the ways in which many consumers access entertainment, news, and information programming. Traditional media outlets, however, are still of vital importance to their local communities and essential to achieving the Commission’s goals of competition, localism, and viewpoint diversity. This is particularly true with respect to local news and public interest programming, with traditional media outlets continuing to serve as the primary sources on which consumers rely. 2. Moreover, for television broadcasters, theirs is an industry on the precipice of great change. The ongoing voluntary incentive auction of broadcast television spectrum, which is critically important to the Commission’s efforts to unleash the full transformative potential of broadband Internet, provides television broadcasters with a new and unique financial opportunity. We anticipate that the auction will both free up significant spectrum for mobile broadband and result in an even healthier broadcast industry. While the auction may have a dramatic impact on the television landscape in many local markets, based on our assessment of the record and the ongoing nature of the auction, we find that it is too soon to quantify this impact; accordingly, it would be premature to change our media ownership rules in anticipation of the incentive auction’s impact at this time.2 We will soon commence our evaluation of the broadcast marketplace post-auction, and we expect that these issues will feature prominently in future media ownership reviews. 3. Based on our careful review of the record, we find that the public interest is best served by retaining our existing rules, with some minor modifications. These rules promote competition and a diversity of viewpoints in local markets, thereby enriching local communities through the promotion of distinct and antagonistic voices. Ideally, our media landscape should be diverse because our population is diverse, and retaining the existing media ownership rules is one way in which the Commission can help to promote such diversity. The record in this proceeding leads us to conclude that retaining the existing rules is the best way to promote our policy goals in local markets at this time. In addition, following the Third Circuit’s decision in Prometheus III, we are readopting the Television Joint Sales Agreement (JSA) Attribution Rule adopted in the Report and Order in this proceeding.3 1 See 2014 Quadrennial Regulatory Review – Review of the Commission’s Broadcast Ownership Rules and Other Rules Adopted Pursuant to Section 202 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 et al., MB Docket No. 14-50, Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and Report and Order, 29 FCC Rcd 4371 (2014) (FNPRM and Report and Order); 2010 Quadrennial Regulatory Review – Review of the Commission’s Broadcast Ownership Rules and Other Rules Adopted Pursuant to Section 202 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 et al., MB Docket No. 09-182, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 26 FCC Rcd 17489 (2011) (NPRM); 2010 Quadrennial Regulatory Review – Review of the Commission’s Broadcast Ownership Rules and Other Rules Adopted Pursuant to Section 202 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, MB Docket No. 09-182, Notice of Inquiry, 25 FCC Rcd 6086 (2010) (NOI). 2 For additional discussion of the incentive auction, see paragraphs 79-81, infra. 3 See infra para. 15. 2 Federal Communications Commission FCC 16-107 4. We also address in this Order the Third Circuit’s remand in Prometheus II of certain aspects of the Commission’s 2008 Diversity Order.4 Specifically, we reinstate the revenue-based eligible entity standard, as well as the associated measures to promote the Commission’s goal of encouraging small business participation in the broadcast industry, which we believe will cultivate innovation and enhance viewpoint diversity. Also, as directed by the court, we have considered the socially and economically disadvantaged business definition as a possible basis for favorable regulatory treatment, as well as other possible definitions that would expressly recognize the race and ethnicity of applicants.5 However, we find that the demanding legal standards the courts have said must be met before the Government may implement preferences based on such race- or gender-conscious definitions have not been satisfied. 5. Finally, we take steps to address concerns about the use of a variety of sharing agreements between independently owned commercial television stations. Specifically, we adopt a definition of Shared Service Agreements (SSAs) and require commercial television stations to disclose those SSAs by placing the agreements in each station’s online public inspection file. This action will lead to more comprehensive information about the prevalence and content of SSAs between television stations, which will improve the Commission’s and the public’s ability to assess the potential impact of these agreements on the Commission’s rules and policies. II. BACKGROUND 6. The media ownership rules subject to this Quadrennial Review are the Local Television Ownership Rule, the Local Radio Ownership Rule, the Newspaper/Broadcast Cross-Ownership Rule, the Radio/Television Cross-Ownership Rule, and the Dual Network Rule.6 Congress requires
Recommended publications
  • 2 a Quotation of Normality – the Family Myth 3 'C'mon Mum, Monday
    Notes 2 A Quotation of Normality – The Family Myth 1 . A less obvious antecedent that The Simpsons benefitted directly and indirectly from was Hanna-Barbera’s Wait ‘til Your Father Gets Home (NBC 1972–1974). This was an attempt to exploit the ratings successes of Norman Lear’s stable of grittier 1970s’ US sitcoms, but as a stepping stone it is entirely noteworthy through its prioritisation of the suburban narrative over the fantastical (i.e., shows like The Flintstones , The Jetsons et al.). 2 . Nelvana was renowned for producing well-regarded production-line chil- dren’s animation throughout the 1980s. It was extended from the 1960s studio Laff-Arts, and formed in 1971 by Michael Hirsh, Patrick Loubert and Clive Smith. Its success was built on a portfolio of highly commercial TV animated work that did not conform to a ‘house-style’ and allowed for more creative practice in television and feature projects (Mazurkewich, 1999, pp. 104–115). 3 . The NBC US version recast Feeble with the voice of The Simpsons regular Hank Azaria, and the emphasis shifted to an American living in England. The show was pulled off the schedules after only three episodes for failing to connect with audiences (Bermam, 1999, para 3). 4 . Aardman’s Lab Animals (2002), planned originally for ITV, sought to make an ironic juxtaposition between the mistreatment of animals as material for scientific experiment and the direct commentary from the animals them- selves, which defines the show. It was quickly assessed as unsuitable for the family slot that it was intended for (Lane, 2003 p.
    [Show full text]
  • Cable Shows Renewed Or Cancelled
    Cable Shows Renewed Or Cancelled Introductory Arturo liquidises or outplays some pleochroism attributively, however unsatiating Yuri inflicts pleasurably or course. Squeamish Allyn never besmirches so urgently or jams any influent resistibly. Montgomery fingerprints refractorily? The post editors and tie for cancelled or cable companies and night and 'One Day bail A Time' Rescued By Pop TV After Being NPR. Ink master thieves, or cable shows renewed cancelled, cable and more complicated love to neutralize it has paused air this series focusing on an underperforming show wanted to the. List of Renewed and Canceled TV Shows for 2020-21 Season. Media blitzes and social engagement help endangered series avoid cancellation. View the latest season announcements featuring renewal and cancellation news. Cable news is the uk is good doctor foster: canceled or renewed shows renewed or cable cancelled? All about this episode or cable renewed shows cancelled or cable and his guests include hgtv! Ticker covers every genre, or cable or. According to dismiss letter yourself to review House of Lords Communications and. Is its last ready with lawrence o'donnell being cancelled. Plenty of cable or cable shows renewed for the. Osmosis was renewed shows or cable cancelled in central new york and! Abc Daytime Schedule 2020 Gruppomathesisit. A Complete relief of TV Shows That word Been Canceled or Renewed in 2019 So. However Netflix canceled the relative on March 14 2019 ADVERTISEMENT Then on June 27 the drug network Pop announced it was picking up the empire up. Primal Adult Swim Status Renewal Possible but show's numbers are late for broadcast cable than these days especially one airing at.
    [Show full text]
  • Netflix and the Development of the Internet Television Network
    Syracuse University SURFACE Dissertations - ALL SURFACE May 2016 Netflix and the Development of the Internet Television Network Laura Osur Syracuse University Follow this and additional works at: https://surface.syr.edu/etd Part of the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Osur, Laura, "Netflix and the Development of the Internet Television Network" (2016). Dissertations - ALL. 448. https://surface.syr.edu/etd/448 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the SURFACE at SURFACE. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations - ALL by an authorized administrator of SURFACE. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Abstract When Netflix launched in April 1998, Internet video was in its infancy. Eighteen years later, Netflix has developed into the first truly global Internet TV network. Many books have been written about the five broadcast networks – NBC, CBS, ABC, Fox, and the CW – and many about the major cable networks – HBO, CNN, MTV, Nickelodeon, just to name a few – and this is the fitting time to undertake a detailed analysis of how Netflix, as the preeminent Internet TV networks, has come to be. This book, then, combines historical, industrial, and textual analysis to investigate, contextualize, and historicize Netflix's development as an Internet TV network. The book is split into four chapters. The first explores the ways in which Netflix's development during its early years a DVD-by-mail company – 1998-2007, a period I am calling "Netflix as Rental Company" – lay the foundations for the company's future iterations and successes. During this period, Netflix adapted DVD distribution to the Internet, revolutionizing the way viewers receive, watch, and choose content, and built a brand reputation on consumer-centric innovation.
    [Show full text]
  • Trading Rabbit Ears for Wi-Fi: Aereo, the Public Performance Right, and How Broadcasters Want to Control the Business of Internet TV
    Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law Volume 16 Issue 4 Issue 4 - Summer 2014 Article 5 2014 Trading Rabbit Ears for Wi-Fi: Aereo, the Public Performance Right, and How Broadcasters Want to Control the Business of Internet TV Jacob Marshall Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/jetlaw Part of the Communications Law Commons, and the Internet Law Commons Recommended Citation Jacob Marshall, Trading Rabbit Ears for Wi-Fi: Aereo, the Public Performance Right, and How Broadcasters Want to Control the Business of Internet TV, 16 Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment and Technology Law 909 (2020) Available at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/jetlaw/vol16/iss4/5 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law by an authorized editor of Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Trading Rabbit Ears for Wi-Fi: Aereo, the Public Performance Right, and How Broadcasters Want to Control the Business of Internet TV ABSTRACT Aereo, a start-up company that allows consumers to stream free, over-the-air broadcasts to their phones and computers, seems rather innocuous. Yet the major broadcasting networks have attempted to shut Aereo down since its inception, claiming that Aereo infringes on their copyright. Aereo claims that its unique technology-where each user is assigned their own, individual antenna-ensures that Aereo does not infringe on the broadcasters'publicperformance rights. The United States Supreme Court has granted certiorarion the matter.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluating Nfl Player Health and Performance: Legal and Ethical Issues
    UNIVERSITY of PENNSYLVANIA LAW REVIEW Founded 1852 Formerly AMERICAN LAW REGISTER © 2017 University of Pennsylvania Law Review VOL. 165 JANUARY 2017 NO. 2 ARTICLE EVALUATING NFL PLAYER HEALTH AND PERFORMANCE: LEGAL AND ETHICAL ISSUES JESSICA L. ROBERTS, I. GLENN COHEN, CHRISTOPHER R. DEUBERT & HOLLY FERNANDEZ LYNCH† This Article follows the path of a hypothetical college football player with aspirations to play in the National Football League, explaining from a legal and † George Butler Research Professor, Director of Health Law & Policy Institute, University of Houston Law Center, 2015–2018 Greenwall Faculty Scholar in Bioethics; Professor, Harvard Law School, Faculty Director of the Petrie–Flom Center for Health Law Policy, Biotechnology, and Bioethics, Co-Lead of the Law and Ethics Initiative, Football Players Health Study at Harvard University; Senior Law and Ethics Associate, Law and Ethics Initiative for the Football Players Health Study at Harvard University; Executive Director, Petrie–Flom Center for Health Law Policy, Biotechnology, and Bioethics, Faculty, Harvard Medical School, Center for Bioethics, Co- Lead, Law and Ethics Initiative, Football Players Health Study at Harvard University, respectively. Cohen, Deubert, and Lynch received salary support from the Football Players Health Study at Harvard University (FPHS), a transformative research initiative with the goal of improving the health of professional football players. About, FOOTBALL PLAYERS HEALTH STUDY HARV. U., https://footballplayershealth.harvard.edu/about/ [https://perma.cc/UN5R-D82L]. Roberts has also received payment as a consultant for the FPHS. The Football Players Health Study was created pursuant to an agreement between Harvard University and the National Football League Players Association (227) 228 University of Pennsylvania Law Review [Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • President Trump's First 100 Days
    MAY 10, 2017 PRESIDENT TRUMP’S FIRST 100 DAYS Throughout the 2016 presidential campaign, candidate Donald Trump pledged himself to a government reform agenda, including “drain the swamp,” “America First,” and cutting regulations and taxes. His stated priorities included repealing and replacing the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) also known as Obamacare, aggressively enforcing the nation’s borders and immigration laws, and reversing Obama administration policies designed to combat climate change. Just before his election, he issued a 100-day action plan.1 Since taking office on January 20, 2017, President Trump has acted on that plan. In response, California Senate President pro Tempore Kevin de León and other state Democratic leaders have strongly rebuked aspects of President Trump’s agenda as being counter to the state’s economic interests and efforts to improve health care coverage, protect the environment, and seek comprehensive immigration reform. Senate legislation has been introduced to protect California’s laws, and Senate committees are conducting hearings to highlight where the state and the federal government have conflicting viewpoints. In addition, the Senate Office of Research is monitoring federal issues. This report highlights key actions and events during the Trump administration’s first 100 days. 1 https://assets.donaldjtrump.com/_landings/contract/O-TRU-102316-Contractv02.pdf and https://www.donaldjtrump.com/press-releases/donald-j.-trump-delivers-groundbreaking-contract-for­ the-american-vote1. 1 100 DAYS OVERVIEW As of April 29, 2017, President Trump’s 100th day in office, he had not signed any major legislation advancing his agenda despite Republicans having control of the presidency and both houses of Congress.
    [Show full text]
  • Essential Guide to the Executive Branch Table of Contents
    The POLITICO Pro ESSENTIAL GUIDE TO THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH TABLE OF CONTENTS › Introduction ............................................ 3 › Branches in Federal Government ............................. 4 › Executive Branch Deep Dive ................................ 5 » What Does the Executive Branch do? » Who Makes up the Executive Branch? » Executive Branch and the Budget Process » Executive Branch and Regulations › Executive Orders Deep Dive ............................... 10 » Executive Orders, Actions, Memorandums and Proclamations FAQs » Executive Orders under President Trump » Amount of Executive Orders by President and by Party 2 | ESSENTIAL GUIDE TO EXECUTIVE BRANCH INTRODUCTION It’s Civics 101. The United States federal government is made up of three branches: legislative, executive and judicial. Each branch’s powers are vested by the U.S. Constitution, and while each has different areas of focus, the system was built so that no single branch of the federal government could become too powerful. In this guide, we’ll focus on the executive branch, taking a deep dive into its responsibilities, who makes up this branch, their role in regulations and budgeting, and what executive orders are and how they work. 3 | ESSENTIAL GUIDE TO EXECUTIVE BRANCH BRANCHES IN FEDERAL GOVERNMENT Let’s review: The federal government of the United States is made up of three branches. 1 2 3 EXECUTIVE BRANCH LEGISLATIVE BRANCH JUDICIAL BRANCH Led by the president of the United States, Made up of the Senate, House of Consisting of the Supreme Court, Court the executive branch is in charge of Representatives and agencies that support of Appeals and District Courts, it’s this implementing and enforcing laws Congress, it is the legislative branch’s job to group’s responsibility to interpret the laws written by Congress.
    [Show full text]
  • NAB Comments Re: Video Competition
    Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington DC 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Annual Assessment of the Status of ) MB Docket No. 07-269 Competition in the Market for the ) Delivery of Video Programming ) To: The Commission COMMENTS OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BROADCASTERS Jane E. Mago Jerianne Timmerman Erin L. Dozier Scott A. Goodwin NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BROADCASTERS 1771 N Street, NW Washington, DC 20036 (202) 429-5430 June 8, 2011 SUMMARY The marketplace for video distribution has changed dramatically over the past decade and continues to evolve at an ever-quickening pace. Although these changes have significantly increased the competition that broadcasters face for viewers and advertisers, broadcasters are continuing to expand the services they provide. Broadcasters are deploying spectrum in innovative new ways, including by offering increased HD programming services, diverse multicast services, and Mobile DTV service. More than 70 stations already have commenced providing Mobile DTV service and many more will do so over the coming months. Mobile DTV is a spectrally efficient, robust over- the-air service that provides viewers with access to local news and other popular video content on an on-the-go basis. As broadcasters continue to innovate, they also continue to build on their traditional strengths, including high-quality national and local programming. Broadcasters are, almost without exception, the only participants in the video marketplace that produce and distribute local news, weather, and public affairs programming. Local broadcasting is particularly critical during times of emergencies, providing life-saving coverage of the recent tornadoes that ripped through Tuscaloosa, Alabama and Joplin, Missouri, as well as innumerable other severe weather events.
    [Show full text]
  • 04.01.21. Referencing Certain News Articles and Concerning Media Leaks
    Flores, Sarah Isgur (OPA) From: Flores,SarahIsgur(OPA) Sent: Tuesday,March21,201712:12PM To: Goldman,Adam Cc: MattApuzzo;Prior,Ian(OPA) Subject: Re:mycontactinfo Definitely! OnMar21,2017,at12:06PM,Goldman,Adam< [email protected] >wrote: Hi, Canwereschedule?Iamoutoftownandwon'tmakeitbackintimeforpastries.Perhapslater thisweek? Adam OnMon,Mar20,2017at5:19PM,Flores,SarahIsgur(OPA)< [email protected]> wrote: Worksform e *** Sarah Isgur Flores Director of Public Affairs (b) (6) From: MattApuzzo[m ailto: matt.apuzzo@nytim es. com] Sent: M onday,March20,20175:05PM To: Goldm an,Adam <adam .goldm an@nytim es.com >;Flores,SarahIsgur(OPA) < [email protected]> Cc: Prior,Ian(OPA)< [email protected]> Subject: Re:mycontactinfo Howabout2? Document ID: 0.7.22207.21648 MattApuzzo TheNewYorkTimes 202.862.0304 w (b) (6) c From: MattApuzzo< matt.apuzzo@nytim es.com > Sent: Monday,March20,20174:54:38PM To: Goldm an,Adam ;Flores,SarahIsgur(OPA) Cc: Prior,Ian(OPA) Subject: Re:m ycontactinfo Youhadmeatafternoonpastries.Perfect.Justsaywhen. MattApuzzo TheNewYorkTimes 202.862.0304 w (b) (6) c From: Flores,SarahIsgur(OPA)< [email protected]> Sent: M onday,March20,20174:48:33PM To: Apuzzo,Matt;Goldm an,Adam Cc: Prior,Ian(OPA) Subject: RE:m ycontactinfo AddingIanwhojuststartedasprincipaldeputyhere.CanwedoanafternoonpastryatPaulon9th tomorrow potentially? *** Sarah Isgur Flores Director of Public Affairs (b) (6) From: Apuzzo,Matt[ mailto:m att.apuzzo@nytim es.com ] Sent: Friday,March17,20175:35PM To: Goldm an,Adam <adam .goldm an@nytim es.com > Cc: Flores,SarahIsgur(OPA)< [email protected]> Subject: Re:m ycontactinfo Document ID: 0.7.22207.21648 Hi Sarah. I look forward to meeting you.
    [Show full text]
  • 2011 State of the News Media Report
    Overview By Tom Rosenstiel and Amy Mitchell of the Project for Excellence in Journalism By several measures, the state of the American news media improved in 2010. After two dreadful years, most sectors of the industry saw revenue begin to recover. With some notable exceptions, cutbacks in newsrooms eased. And while still more talk than action, some experiments with new revenue models began to show signs of blossoming. Among the major sectors, only newspapers suffered continued revenue declines last year—an unmistakable sign that the structural economic problems facing newspapers are more severe than those of other media. When the final tallies are in, we estimate 1,000 to 1,500 more newsroom jobs will have been lost—meaning newspaper newsrooms are 30% smaller than in 2000. Beneath all this, however, a more fundamental challenge to journalism became clearer in the last year. The biggest issue ahead may not be lack of audience or even lack of new revenue experiments. It may be that in the digital realm the news industry is no longer in control of its own future. News organizations — old and new — still produce most of the content audiences consume. But each technological advance has added a new layer of complexity—and a new set of players—in connecting that content to consumers and advertisers. In the digital space, the organizations that produce the news increasingly rely on independent networks to sell their ads. They depend on aggregators (such as Google) and social networks (such as Facebook) to bring them a substantial portion of their audience. And now, as news consumption becomes more mobile, news companies must follow the rules of device makers (such as Apple) and software developers (Google again) to deliver their content.
    [Show full text]
  • The American Television in Ustry
    T I The American Television In ustry Michael Curtin and Jane Shattuc A BFI book published by Palgrave Macmillan Contents Introduction 1 1 Key Players 5 2 Audiences and Advertising 34 3 Television Programming 58 4 Making TV on the Broadcast Networks 88 5 Branded Cable Networks 119 6 The New Economies of TV Information 145 Conclusion 172 © Michael Curtin and Jane Shattuc 2009 Bibliography 185 All rights reserved. No reproduction, copy or transmission of this publication may be made without written permission. No Index 193 portion of this publication may be reproduced, copied or transmitted save with written permission or in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, or under the terms of any licence permitting limited copying issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency, Saffron House, 6-10 Kirby Street, London EClN 8TS. Any person who does any unauthorised act in relation to this publication may be liable to criminal prosecution and civil claims for damages. The authors have asserted their rights to be identified as the authors of this work in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. First published in 2009 by PALGRAVE MACMILLAN on behalf of the BRITISH FILM INSTITUTE 21 Stephen Street, London WlT lLN www.bfi.org.uk There's more to discover about film and television through the BFI. Our world-renowned archive, cinemas, festivals, films, publications and learning resources are here to inspire you. Palgrave Macmillan in the UK is an imprint of Macmillan Publishers Limited, registered in England, company number 785998, of Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 6XS.
    [Show full text]
  • Industry Space and Structures of Power at the San Diego Comic-Con
    Making Fandom Work: Industry Space and Structures of Power at the San Diego Comic-Con by Erin Melissa Hanna A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Screen Arts and Cultures) in the University of Michigan 2014 Doctoral Committee: Associate Professor Sheila C. Murphy, Chair Associate Professor Dan Chilcote Herbert Associate Professor Aswin Punathambekar Associate Professor Yeidy M. Rivero Comic-Con Souvenir Book Cover, Dick Giordano, 1981 (Stadler, Mark, ed. 1981 San Diego Comic-Con Souvenir Book. San Diego: San Diego Comic-Con, Inc., 1981.) © Erin Hanna 2014 For Daddy I only have to close my eyes dear And suddenly I’m where you are ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS It seems strange, at the end of a process so dependent on intensive research and critical thought, to shift gears and channel something directly from my heart onto the page. Some people talk about their dissertation or book as a labour of love. But if I’m speaking from the heart here, I should confess that most of the time it just felt like a lot of really hard work; hard work that was fueled by the love and generosity of a lot of people, whom I’m incredibly lucky to have in my life. It’s really their love that made my labour possible. I was very fortunate to have an array of fabulous professors and mentors as I worked towards my Bachelors and Masters degrees at York University’s Department of Film. John McCullough and Suzie Young encouraged me to pursue graduate school and their instruction and mentorship spurred my intellectual growth and changed the way I thought about media.
    [Show full text]