Systemic Paralogy and Function of Retinal Determination Network Homologs in Arachnids Guilherme Gainett1*†, Jesús A
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Gainett et al. BMC Genomics (2020) 21:811 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-020-07149-x RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Systemic paralogy and function of retinal determination network homologs in arachnids Guilherme Gainett1*†, Jesús A. Ballesteros1*†, Charlotte R. Kanzler1, Jakob T. Zehms1, John M. Zern1, Shlomi Aharon2, Efrat Gavish-Regev2 and Prashant P. Sharma1 Abstract Background: Arachnids are important components of cave ecosystems and display many examples of troglomorphisms, such as blindness, depigmentation, and elongate appendages. Little is known about how the eyes of arachnids are specified genetically, let alone the mechanisms for eye reduction and loss in troglomorphic arachnids. Additionally, duplication of Retinal Determination Gene Network (RDGN) homologs in spiders has convoluted functional inferences extrapolated from single-copy homologs in pancrustacean models. Results: We investigated a sister species pair of Israeli cave whip spiders, Charinus ioanniticus and C. israelensis (Arachnopulmonata, Amblypygi), of which one species has reduced eyes. We generated embryonic transcriptomes for both Amblypygi species, and discovered that several RDGN homologs exhibit duplications. We show that duplication of RDGN homologs is systemic across arachnopulmonates (arachnid orders that bear book lungs), rather than being a spider-specific phenomenon. A differential gene expression (DGE) analysis comparing the expression of RDGN genes in field-collected embryos of both species identified candidate RDGN genes involved in the formation and reduction of eyes in whip spiders. To ground bioinformatic inference of expression patterns with functional experiments, we interrogated the function of three candidate RDGN genes identified from DGE using RNAi in the spider Parasteatoda tepidariorum. We provide functional evidence that one of these paralogs, sine oculis/Six1 A (soA), is necessary for the development of all arachnid eye types. Conclusions: Our work establishes a foundation to investigate the genetics of troglomorphic adaptations in cave arachnids, and links differential gene expression to an arthropod eye phenotype for the first time outside of Pancrustacea. Our results support the conservation of at least one RDGN component across Arthropoda and provide a framework for identifying the role of gene duplications in generating arachnid eye diversity. Keywords: Cave blindness, sine oculis, Six1, Parasteatoda tepidariorum, Amblypygi, RNAi * Correspondence: [email protected]; [email protected] †Guilherme Gainett and Jesús A. Ballesteros contributed equally to this work. 1Department of Integrative Biology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA Full list of author information is available at the end of the article © The Author(s). 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. Gainett et al. BMC Genomics (2020) 21:811 Page 2 of 17 Background of arachnids are structurally and functionally different Cave habitats offer apt systems for investigating the gen- from those of pancrustaceans. Typically, the main eyes etic basis of morphological convergence because com- of adult Pancrustacea (e.g., A. aquaticus) are a pair of munities of these habitats are similarly shaped by faceted (or apposition) eyes, which are composed of environmental pressures, such as absence of light and many subunits of ommatidia. In addition, adult Pancrus- diminished primary productivity [1, 2]. Troglobites, spe- tacea have small median ocelli (typically three in holo- cies exclusive to cave environments and adapted to life metabolous insects), often located medially and at the in the dark, exhibit a suite of characteristics common to top of the head. cave systems around the world, such as reduction or By contrast, extant arachnids lack ommatidia and typ- complete loss of eyes, depigmentation, elongation of ically have multiple pairs of eyes arranged along the appendages and sensory structures, and decreased meta- frontal carapace. All arachnid eyes are simple-lens eyes bolic activity [3–5]. Previous work has shown that tro- or ocelli; each eye has a single cuticular lens, below glomorphism can evolve over short time spans (< 50 kyr) which are a vitreous body and visual cells. The retina is despite gene flow [6–8] and that parallel evolution of composed of the visual cells and pigment cells. These troglomorphic traits (e.g., depigmentation; eye loss) in eyes are divided in two types, namely the principal eyes independent populations can involve the same genetic and the secondary eyes [31, 32]. Principal and secondary locus [9–11]. eyes differ in the orientation of their retina [33]: the Troglomorphism and troglobitic fauna have been ana- principal eyes are of the everted type, with the visual lyzed across numerous taxonomic groups with respect cells lying distally, and lack a reflective layer; the second- to systematics and population genetics. However, one ary eyes are inverted, with the light-sensitive rhabdo- component of the troglobitic fauna that remains poorly meres pointing away from incoming light (analogous to understood is cave arachnids. Most species of Arachnida vertebrate eyes). All secondary eyes possess a reflective are prone to nocturnal habits and some orders broadly layer of crystalline deposits called a tapetum, which is exhibit troglophily; in fact, troglobitic species are known responsible for the “eye shine” of spiders. The principal from all the extant terrestrial arachnid orders except eyes are the median eyes (ME, also known as anterior Solifugae and Thelyphonida [12–20]. In addition to eye median eyes). The secondary eyes comprise the anterior and pigment loss, troglomorphism in arachnids mani- lateral eyes (ALE), posterior lateral eyes (PLE), and me- fests in the form of compensatory elongation of walking dian lateral eyes (MLE; also known as posterior median legs and palps, appendages which harbor sensory struc- eyes) (Fig. 1a) [31, 32] (nomenclature used here follows tures in this group [21–24]. Schomburg et al. 2015). Certain orders and suborders of Thorough understanding of the developmental genetic arachnids have lost one type of eye altogether, with the basis for the evolution of troglomorphic traits has been homology of eyes clarified by the fossil record and em- largely spearheaded in two model systems: the Mexican bryology [31, 34, 35]. cave fish Astyanax mexicanus [5–8, 10, 25] and the cave The second concern in extrapolating developmental isopod Asellus aquaticus [4, 9, 26]. Both model systems processes derived from pancrustaceans is that a subset have more than one hypogean population, can be main- of Arachnida exhibits an ancient shared genome duplica- tained in the laboratory, and are amenable to approaches tion, resulting in numerous paralogs of developmental such as genetic crosses and quantitative trait locus map- patterning genes. Recent phylogenetic and comparative ping. The advent of short read sequencing technology in genomic works on Arachnida have shown that Arachno- tandem with experimental approaches has transformed pulmonata [36–38], the clade of arachnids that bear the potential to triangulate regulatory differences be- book lungs (e.g., spiders, scorpions, whip spiders), retain tween hypogean (subterranean) and epigean (surface- duplicates of many key transcription factors, such as dwelling) lineages [3, 9, 10, 26], and to study a broader homeobox genes, often in conserved syntenic blocks range of cave taxa. Among arthropods, work on the iso- [39–42]. Many of the ensuing paralogs exhibit non- pod A. aquaticus in particular has made significant overlapping expression patterns and a small number advances in the identification of loci regulating pigmen- have been shown to have subdivided the ancestral gene tation and size of arthropod eyes [9, 11], complementing function (subfunctionalization) or acquired new func- forward and reverse genetic screening approaches in tions (neofunctionalization) [42–44]. other pancrustacean models (e.g., Drosophila melanoga- While comparatively little is known about the genetics ster, Tribolium castaneum,andGryllus bimaculatus) of arachnid eye development, gene expression surveys of [27–30]. However, developmental and genetic insights insect retinal determination gene network (RDGN) ho- into the evolution of blindness illuminated by A. aquati- mologs of two spiders (Cupiennius salei and Parastea- cus and other pancrustacean models are not directly toda tepidariorum) have shown that this phenomenon transferable to Arachnida for two reasons. First, the