TRAFFIC BULLETIN 28 No 2 October 2016
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Full Text in Pdf Format
Vol. 78: 87–95, 2007 DISEASES OF AQUATIC ORGANISMS Published December 13 doi: 10.3354/dao01861 Dis Aquat Org Survey for the amphibian chytrid Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis in Hong Kong in native amphibians and in the international amphibian trade Jodi J. L. Rowley1, 5,*, Simon Kin Fung Chan2, Wing Sze Tang2, Richard Speare3, Lee F. Skerratt 4, Ross A. Alford1, Ka Shing Cheung 2, Ching Yee Ho2, Ruth Campbell4 1School of Marine and Tropical Biology and Amphibian Disease Ecology Group, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia 4811 2Herpetofauna Working Group, Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department, The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, 7/F, Cheung Sha Wan Government Offices, 303 Cheung Sha Wan Road, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China 3School of Public Health, Tropical Medicine and Rehabilitation and Amphibian Disease Ecology Group, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia 4811 4School of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences and Amphibian Disease Ecology Group, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia 4811 5Present address: Conservation International Indo-Burma, PO Box 1356, Phnom Penh, Cambodia ABSTRACT: Chytridiomycosis, caused by the pathogen Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis, is respon- sible for many amphibian declines and has been identified in wild amphibian populations on all con- tinents where they exist, except for Asia. In order to assess whether B. dendrobatidis is present on the native amphibians of Hong Kong, we sampled wild populations of Amolops hongkongensis, Paa exil- ispinosa, P. spinosa and Rana chloronota during 2005–2006. Amphibians infected with B. dendro- batidis have been found in the international trade, so we also examined the extent and nature of the amphibian trade in Hong Kong during 2005–2006, and assessed whether B. -
Analyses of Proposals to Amend
CoP17 Prop. 38 Inclusion of False Tomato Frog Dyscophus guineti and Antsouhy Tomato Frog D. insularis in Appendix II Proponent: Madagascar Summary: The False Tomato Frog Dyscophus guineti and the Antsouhy Tomato Frog D. insularis comprise two of three species in the genus Dyscophus, all of which are endemic to Madagascar. The third species, D. antongilii was included in Appendix I in 1987. It is subject to a separate proposal to be transferred from Appendix I to Appendix II (Proposal 37). All three are attractive red-orange coloured frogs. Dyscophus are known to breed explosively with the availability of water during the rainy season (typically January-March) and during that time they can be found in abundance at breeding sites. Hundreds of eggs are laid in water following mating. Dyscophus guineti The known distribution of D. guineti includes a number of patches in the remnant central eastern rainforest of Madagascar. The species is secretive and believed likely to be more widespread than records indicate1. Overall population is unknown; locally the species can vary from extremely common to very rare1. Sexual maturity is attained between two and four years, comparatively earlier in males than in females2. The habitat of the species is affected by conversion of forest to agriculture, timber extraction, charcoal production and potentially small-scale mining activities. The species reportedly does not tolerate severe degredation1. There is not known to be local use of the species. As a consequence of the Appendix-I listing in 1987 of the similar Dyscophus antongilii, collectors interested in "red Dyscophus" have shifted their attention to D. -
Suggested Guidelines for Reptiles and Amphibians Used in Outreach
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR REPTILES AND AMPHIBIANS USED IN OUTREACH PROGRAMS Compiled by Diane Barber, Fort Worth Zoo Originally posted September 2003; updated February 2008 INTRODUCTION This document has been created by the AZA Reptile and Amphibian Taxon Advisory Groups to be used as a resource to aid in the development of institutional outreach programs. Within this document are lists of species that are commonly used in reptile and amphibian outreach programs. With over 12,700 species of reptiles and amphibians in existence today, it is obvious that there are numerous combinations of species that could be safely used in outreach programs. It is not the intent of these Taxon Advisory Groups to produce an all-inclusive or restrictive list of species to be used in outreach. Rather, these lists are intended for use as a resource and are some of the more common species that have been safely used in outreach programs. A few species listed as potential outreach animals have been earmarked as controversial by TAG members for various reasons. In each case, we have made an effort to explain debatable issues, enabling staff members to make informed decisions as to whether or not each animal is appropriate for their situation and the messages they wish to convey. It is hoped that during the species selection process for outreach programs, educators, collection managers, and other zoo staff work together, using TAG Outreach Guidelines, TAG Regional Collection Plans, and Institutional Collection Plans as tools. It is well understood that space in zoos is limited and it is important that outreach animals are included in institutional collection plans and incorporated into conservation programs when feasible. -
Cop13 Analyses Cover 29 Jul 04.Qxd
IUCN/TRAFFIC Analyses of the Proposals to Amend the CITES Appendices at the 13th Meeting of the Conference of the Parties Bangkok, Thailand 2-14 October 2004 Prepared by IUCN Species Survival Commission and TRAFFIC Production of the 2004 IUCN/TRAFFIC Analyses of the Proposals to Amend the CITES Appendices was made possible through the support of: The Commission of the European Union Canadian Wildlife Service Ministry of Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality, Department for Nature, the Netherlands Federal Agency for Nature Conservation, Germany Federal Veterinary Office, Switzerland Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, Dirección General para la Biodiversidad (Spain) Ministère de l'écologie et du développement durable, Direction de la nature et des paysages (France) IUCN-The World Conservation Union IUCN-The World Conservation Union brings together states, government agencies and a diverse range of non-governmental organizations in a unique global partnership - over 1 000 members in some 140 countries. As a Union, IUCN seeks to influence, encourage and assist societies throughout the world to conserve the integrity and diversity of nature and to ensure that any use of natural resources is equitable and ecologically sustainable. IUCN builds on the strengths of its members, networks and partners to enhance their capacity and to support global alliances to safeguard natural resources at local, regional and global levels. The Species Survival Commission (SSC) is the largest of IUCN’s six volunteer commissions. With 8 000 scientists, field researchers, government officials and conservation leaders, the SSC membership is an unmatched source of information about biodiversity conservation. SSC members provide technical and scientific advice to conservation activities throughout the world and to governments, international conventions and conservation organizations. -
Changes to CITES Species Listings
NOTICE TO THE WILDLIFE IMPORT/EXPORT COMMUNITY December 21, 2016 Subject: Changes to CITES Species Listings Background: Party countries of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES) meet approximately every two years for a Conference of the Parties. During these meetings, countries review and vote on amendments to the listings of protected species in CITES Appendix I and Appendix II. Such amendments become effective 90 days after the last day of the meeting unless Party countries agree to delay implementation. The most recent Conference of the Parties (CoP 17) was held in Johannesburg, South Africa, September 24 – October 4, 2016. Action: Except as noted below, the amendments to CITES Appendices I and II that were adopted at CoP 17, will be effective on January 2, 2017. Any specimens of these species imported into, or exported from, the United States on or after January 2, 2017 will require CITES documentation as specified under the amended listings. The import, export, or re-export of shipments of these species that are accompanied by CITES documents reflecting a pre-January 2 listing status or that lack CITES documents because no listing was previously in effect must be completed by midnight (local time at the point of import/export) on January 1, 2017. Importers and exporters can find the official revised CITES appendices on the CITES website. Species Added to Appendix I . Abronia anzuetoi (Alligator lizard) . Abronia campbelli (Alligator lizard) . Abronia fimbriata (Alligator lizard) . Abronia frosti (Alligator lizard) . Abronia meledona (Alligator lizard) . Cnemaspis psychedelica (Psychedelic rock gecko) . Lygodactylus williamsi (Turquoise dwarf gecko) . Telmatobius coleus (Titicaca water frog) . -
Taxonomy Systematik
Taxonomy Domain: Eukaryota - Whittaker & Margulis,1978 Kingdom: Animalia - Linnaeus, 1758 - animals Subkingdom: Bilateria - (Hatschek, 1888) Cavalier-Smith, 1983 Branch: Deuterostomia - Grobben, 1908 Infrakingdom: Chordonia - (Haeckel, 1874) Cavalier-Smith, 1998 Phylum: Chordata - Bateson, 1885 - Chordates Subphylum: Vertebrata - Cuvier, 1812 - Vertebrates Infraphylum: Gnathostomata - Auct. - Jawed Vertebrates Superclass: Tetrapoda - Goodrich, 1930 Class: Sauropsida Subclass: Diapsida Infraclass: Lepidosauromorpha Superorder: Lepidosauria - ? Order: Squamata Suborder: Lacertilia Infraorder: Gekkota Family: Gekkonidae Subfamily: Gekkoninae Genus: Lygodactylus - Gray, 1864 Specific name: williamsi - Loveridge, 1952 Scientific name: Lygodactylus williamsi - Loveridge, 1952 Systematik Klasse: Reptilien (Reptilia) Ordnung: Schuppenkriechtiere (Squamata) Unterordnung: Echsen (Lacertilia) Überfamilie: Geckoartige (Gekkota) Familie: Geckos (Gekkonidae) Gattung: Zwerggeckos (Lygodactylus) Arten: Himmelblauer Zwergtaggecko (Lygodactylus williamsi) Unterarten: --- Peter Kaiser Seite - 1 - Systematik_Lygodactylus.doc, 26.12.2011 Art Unterart Unterart Terra typica Erstbeschreiber (wissenschaftl. Name) (wissenschaftl. Name) (deutscher Name) Lygodactylus angolensis E Angola, Zimbabwe, Tanzania, Kenya, BOCAGE, 1896 Republic of South Africa, S Democratic Republic of the Congo (Zaire), Mozambique, N Botswana ?, NE Namibia. Type locality: Hanha, Benguela, Angola. Lygodactylus angularis Lygodactylus angularis angularis Gelbkopf-Taggecko SW Tanzania, Malawi, -
Journal of the East Africa Natural History Society and National Museum
JOURNAL OF THE EAST AFRICA NATURAL HISTORY SOCIETY AND NATIONAL MUSEUM 15 October, 1978 Vol. 31 No. 167 A CHECKLIST OF mE SNAKES OF KENYA Stephen Spawls 35 WQodland Rise, Muswell Hill, London NIO, England ABSTRACT Loveridge (1957) lists 161 species and subspecies of snake from East Mrica. Eighty-nine of these belonging to some 41 genera were recorded from Kenya. The new list contains some 106 forms of 46 genera. - Three full species have been deleted from Loveridge's original checklist. Typhlops b. blanfordii has been synonymised with Typhlops I. lineolatus, Typhlops kaimosae has been synonymised with Typhlops angolensis (Roux-Esteve 1974) and Co/uber citeroii has been synonymised with Meizodon semiornatus (Lanza 1963). Of the 20 forms added to the list, 12 are forms collected for the first time in Kenya but occurring outside its political boundaries and one, Atheris desaixi is a new species, the holotype and paratypes being collected within Kenya. There has also been a large number of changes amongst the 89 original species as a result of revisionary systematic studies. This accounts for the other additions to the list. INTRODUCTION The most recent checklist dealing with the snakes of Kenya is Loveridge (1957). Since that date there has been a significant number of developments in the Kenyan herpetological field. This paper intends to update the nomenclature in the part of the checklist that concerns the snakes of Kenya and to extend the list to include all the species now known to occur within the political boundaries of Kenya. It also provides the range of each species within Kenya with specific locality records . -
Analyses UICN/TRAFFIC Des Propositions D'amendement Aux Annexes De La CITES, 2016,Ont Pu Être Préparées Grâce À L'appui Des Organismes Suivants
S Analyses E UICN/TRAFFIC des propositions d’amendement aux S Annexes de la CITES pour la 17e session de la Conférence des Parties Johannesburg, Afrique du Sud 24 Septembre–5 Octobre 2016 L Y Préparées par le programme d’espèces de l’UICN et la Commission UICN de la sauvegarde des espèces et TRAFFIC A N A Analyses UICN/TRAFFIC des propositions d’amendement aux Annexes de la CITES pour la 17e session de la Conférence des Parties Johannesburg, Afrique du Sud 24 Septembre–5 Octobre 2016 Préparées par le programme d’espèces de l’UICN et la Commission UICN de la sauvegarde des espèces et TRAFFIC With the financial support of the EU Austria, Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, Environment and Water Management Ministry of the Environment of Finland Ministry of External Affairs and Cooperation Germany, Federal Ministry for the France, Ministry of Environment, Environment, Nature Conservation and Energy and the Sea Nuclear Safety Netherlands, CITES Management Authority, Ministry of Economic Affairs España - Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad New Zealand, Department of Conservation Naturvårdsverket – Swedish Environmental Federal Food Safety and Veterinary Office FSVO, Protection Agency, Scientific Authority of CITES Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA United States, U.S Fish & Wildlife Service Les Analyses UICN/TRAFFIC des propositions d'amendement aux annexes de la CITES, 2016,ont pu être préparées grâce à l'appui des organismes suivants : Allemagne – Ministère fédéral de l’environnement, de la conservation de la nature et de -
Trade in Live Reptiles, Its Impact on Wild Populations, and the Role of the European Market
BIOC-06813; No of Pages 17 Biological Conservation xxx (2016) xxx–xxx Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Biological Conservation journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/bioc Review Trade in live reptiles, its impact on wild populations, and the role of the European market Mark Auliya a,⁎,SandraAltherrb, Daniel Ariano-Sanchez c, Ernst H. Baard d,CarlBrownd,RafeM.Browne, Juan-Carlos Cantu f,GabrieleGentileg, Paul Gildenhuys d, Evert Henningheim h, Jürgen Hintzmann i, Kahoru Kanari j, Milivoje Krvavac k, Marieke Lettink l, Jörg Lippert m, Luca Luiselli n,o, Göran Nilson p, Truong Quang Nguyen q, Vincent Nijman r, James F. Parham s, Stesha A. Pasachnik t,MiguelPedronou, Anna Rauhaus v,DannyRuedaCórdovaw, Maria-Elena Sanchez x,UlrichScheppy, Mona van Schingen z,v, Norbert Schneeweiss aa, Gabriel H. Segniagbeto ab, Ruchira Somaweera ac, Emerson Y. Sy ad,OguzTürkozanae, Sabine Vinke af, Thomas Vinke af,RajuVyasag, Stuart Williamson ah,1,ThomasZieglerai,aj a Department Conservation Biology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Conservation (UFZ), Permoserstrasse 15, 04318 Leipzig, Germany b Pro Wildlife, Kidlerstrasse 2, 81371 Munich, Germany c Departamento de Biología, Universidad del Valle de, Guatemala d Western Cape Nature Conservation Board, South Africa e Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology,University of Kansas Biodiversity Institute, 1345 Jayhawk Blvd, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA f Bosques de Cerezos 112, C.P. 11700 México D.F., Mexico g Dipartimento di Biologia, Universitá Tor Vergata, Roma, Italy h Amsterdam, The Netherlands -
3 Translation from Norwegian Regulation on the Import
Translation from Norwegian Regulation on the import, export, re-export and transfer or possession of threatened species of wild flora and fauna (Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species, CITES) Commended by Royal Decree of xx xx 2016 on the authority of the Act of 19 June 2009 no. 100 relating to the Management of Nature Diversity, section 26; the Act of 15 June 2001 no. 79 relating to Environmental Protection on Svalbard, section 26, second paragraph: and the Act of 27 February 1930 no. 2 relating to Jan Mayen, section 2, third paragraph. Commended by Ministry of Climate and Environment. Chapter 1 - Purpose and scope 1. Purpose The purpose of this Regulation is to conserve natural wild species which are, or may become, threatened with extinction as the result of trade. 2. Objective scope This Regulation concerns the import, export and re-export of specimens, alive or dead, of animal and plant species cited in Annex 1. Re-export shall mean export of any specimen that has previously been introduced into the Regulation area. This Regulation also concerns domestic transfer and possession of specimens, alive or dead, of animal and plant species cited in Annex 1. The first and second subparagraphs also concern parts of products that are prepared from or declared as prepared from such species. Hunting trophies are also considered to be dead specimens/ products. Hunting trophy means the whole or recognisable parts of animals, either raw, processed or produced. The first, second and third subparagraphs also concern hybrids. Hybrid means the re-crossing of specimens of species regulated under CITES as far back as the fourth generation, with specimens of species not regulated under CITES. -
Inclusion in Appendix II, Bush Viper
Original language: English and French CoP17 Prop. XX CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN ENDANGERED SPECIES OF WILD FAUNA AND FLORA ____________________ Seventeenth meeting of the Conference of the Parties Johannesburg (South Africa), 24 September - 5 October 2016 CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSALS FOR AMENDMENT OF APPENDICES I AND II A. Proposal Inclusion of the Mt. Kenya Bush Viper Atheris desaixi in Appendix II in accordance with Article II, paragraph 2 (a), of the Convention and Resolution Conf. 9.24 (Rev. CoP16), Annex 2 a. B. Proponent Kenya C. Supporting statement 1. Taxonomy 1.1. Class: Reptilia 1.2. Order: Squamata 1.3. Family: Viperidae 1.4. Genus and species: Atheris desaixi (Ashe, 1968) 1.5. Scientific synonyms: None 1.6. Common names: English Mt. Kenya Bush Viper, Ashe’s Viper 1.7. Code number: Not applicable 2. Overview This proposal seeks to list Mt Kenya bush viper in CITES Appendix to help regulate trade and enhance enforcement for its conservation. Mt. Kenya Bush viper is endemic to Kenya and has a restricted range in mid-attitude forests in central Kenya. The species is reported to be in decline in its known sites to the extent of depletion as a result of habitat degradation and illegal collection. Natural densities are very low and census is very difficult to carry out. No meaningful monitoring of trade is possible without a CITES listing and no records exist as all the trade is illegal. There is evidence of international live trade to meet demands for zoos and private collections mainly in CoP17 Prop. XX – p. 1 Europe and USA. -
Analyses of Proposals to Amend
CoP17 Prop. 30 Inclusion of Turquoise Dwarf Gecko Lygodactylus williamsi in Appendix I Proponents: United Republic of Tanzania and European Union Summary: The Turquoise Dwarf Gecko Lygodactylus williamsi is a species endemic to eastern Tanzania where it is known to occur in four isolated tropical lowland forest patches (Kimboza, Ruvu, Mbagalala and Muhalama) in the Uluguru foothills in the Morogoro Region. Within these forests it exclusively occurs on a species of screwpine Pandanus rabaiensis. It has an estimated area of occurrence of 20km² and area of occupancy of 8km². The species exhibits distinct sexual dichromatism; males have a striking turquoise-blue back while females and immature males are a greenish-bronze. Reproduction is reported to occur throughout the year with a relatively high output of offspring. Generation time is not known. The only available quantified information on population status is for that in the Kimboza Forest Reserve, estimated in 2009 at around 150,000 adults based on visual encounter surveys and mean number of specimens found per P. rabaiensis. Populations elsewhere have not been quantified; those in the Mbagalala and Muhalama forest patches are believed to be small due to the small number of P. rabaiensis trees. The estimated population in Kimboza forest in 2009 was believed to be around one-third smaller than the carrying capacity, based on the number of P. rabaiensis trees. If this represents an actual decline, this may be a result of collection pressure for international trade, which has reportedly been high since 2004. Reports suggest that some 22,000 were collected in 2005 and some 8000 per year in 2006 and 2007.