DOCSLIB.ORG

USCIRF's 2021 Annual Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
USCIRF's 2021 Annual Report UNITED STATES COMMISSION ON INTERNATIONAL RELIGIOUS FREEDOM ANNUAL REPORT 2021 WWW.USCIRF.GOV ANNUAL REPORT OF THE U.S. COMMISSION ON INTERNATIONAL RELIGIOUS FREEDOM COMMISSIONERS Gayle Manchin Chair Tony Perkins Anurima Bhargava Vice Chairs Gary L. Bauer James W. Carr Frederick A. Davie Nadine Maenza Johnnie Moore Nury Turkel Erin D. Singshinsuk Executive Director April 2021 PROFESSIONAL STAFF Dwight Bashir, Director of Outreach and Policy Elizabeth K. Cassidy, Director of Research and Policy Roy Haskins, Director of Finance and Operations Thomas Kraemer, Director of Human Resources Danielle Ashbahian, Senior Communications Specialist Kirsten Lavery, Supervisory Policy Analyst Jamie Staley, Senior Congressional Relations Specialist Scott Weiner, Supervisory Policy Analyst Kurt Werthmuller, Supervisory Policy Analyst Keely Bakken, Senior Policy Analyst Mingzhi Chen, Policy Analyst Patrick Greenwalt, Policy Analyst Gabrielle Hasenstab, Communications Specialist Niala Mohammad, Senior Policy Analyst Jason Morton, Senior Policy Analyst Mohyeldin Omer, Policy Analyst Zachary Udin, Researcher Nina Ullom, Congressional Relations Specialist Madeline Vellturo, Policy Analyst U.S. COMMISSION ON INTERNATIONAL RELIGIOUS FREEDOM 732 North Capitol Street, NW, Suite A714 Washington, DC 20401 (P) 202–523–3240 www.uscirf.gov TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction and Overview ..................................................1 About this Report ...........................................................1 Standards for CPC, SWL, and EPC Recommendations ...................................1 USCIRF’s 2021 CPC, SWL, and EPC Recommendations ..................................2 Changes in SWL Recommendations ...............................................3 Violations of Human Rights on the Basis of Religion ....................................4 Implementation of the International Religious Freedom Act ....................7 Key Findings ...............................................................7 Recommendations to the Administration ............................................8 Recommendations to Congress ..................................................8 Key USCIRF Resources & Activities ................................................8 Legal Framework ............................................................9 Key Developments in 2020 and Early 2021 ...........................................9 Countries Recommended for Designation as Countries of Particular Concern (CPCs) .......................................14 Burma ..................................................................14 China ...................................................................16 Eritrea ..................................................................20 India ....................................................................22 Iran ....................................................................26 Nigeria. .30 North Korea ..............................................................34 Pakistan .................................................................36 Russia ...................................................................38 Saudi Arabia ..............................................................40 Syria ....................................................................44 Tajikistan. 48 Turkmenistan ..............................................................50 Vietnam .................................................................52 Countries Recommended for the State Department’s Special Watch List (SWL) .................................54 Afghanistan ...............................................................54 Algeria ..................................................................56 Azerbaijan ................................................................58 Cuba ...................................................................62 Egypt ...................................................................66 Indonesia ................................................................70 Iraq ....................................................................74 Kazakhstan ...............................................................76 Malaysia. 78 Nicaragua. .80 Turkey ..................................................................82 Uzbekistan ...............................................................84 Other Key Developments. 87 COVID-19 and Religious Freedom ...............................................87 Attacks on Houses of Worship. .87 Political Unrest Leading to Religious Freedom Violations ................................88 Blasphemy Laws ...........................................................88 Global Antisemitism .........................................................88 China’s International Influence on Religious Freedom and Human Rights. 89 Key USCIRF Recommendations Implemented in 2020 and Early 2021 ...........91 Designating the Worst Violators. 91 Increasing the Use of Targeted Sanctions ..........................................91 Increasing Prioritization of Religious Freedom .......................................92 Filling IRF Related Appointments ................................................92 Increasing the Refugee Ceiling ..................................................92 Raising IRF Issues in Bilateral and Multilateral Engagement ..............................92 Advocating for Religious Prisoners of Conscience .....................................92 Increasing Aid to Support Religious Minorities and Religious Freedom ......................92 Designating Uyghur Genocide. .92 Adopting Laws and Passing Resolutions Related to Religious Freedom ......................93 Appendix 1 Commissioner Biographies .......................................95 Appendix 2 Religious Prisoners of Conscience Project and Victims List ............97 INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW n 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic significantly impacted daily life in USCIRF’s 2021 Annual Report assesses religious freedom vio- every country across the world. By early January 2021, the World lations and progress during calendar year 2020 in 26 countries and IHealth Organization (WHO) reported 83 million cases and 1.8 million makes independent recommendations for U.S. policy. The key find- deaths globally since the pandemic’s start, with the numbers con- ings, recommendations, and analysis in this report are based on a tinuing to climb. The year severely challenged individuals, families, year’s research by USCIRF, including travel, hearings, meetings, and religious and other communities, medical and educational systems, briefings, and are approved by a majority vote of Commissioners, with arts and cultural institutions, workplaces and economies, and gov- each Commissioner, under the statute, having the option to include ernments worldwide. a statement with his or her own individual views. During the first two Public health measures to control the virus’ spread restricted months of 2020, Commissioners and/or staff visited Azerbaijan, Laos, in-person gatherings, including religious gatherings. As the U.S. Malaysia, and Sudan to assess religious freedom conditions. For the Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) noted in rest of the year and in early 2021, USCIRF did not travel due to the March, in many cases these measures complied with international coronavirus pandemic. human rights standards protecting freedom of religion or belief, but in The report’s primary focus is on two groups of countries: first, some cases they did not. Such measures must be necessary to protect those that USCIRF recommends the State Department should des- the legitimate state interest of preventing disease and proportionate ignate as “countries of particular concern,” or CPCs, under IRFA, to meeting that aim, must not be discriminatory, and must be lifted and second, those that USCIRF recommends the State Department once the crisis has passed. should place on its Special Watch List (SWL). The report also includes USCIRF’s monitoring revealed that in some countries, already USCIRF’s recommendations of violent nonstate actors for designa- marginalized religious minorities faced official and/or societal stig- tion by the State Department as “entities of particular concern,” matization, harassment, and or EPCs, under IRFA. In addition, discrimination for allegedly causing the report analyzes the U.S. gov- or spreading the virus. Additionally, ernment’s implementation of since crowded prisons present a [I]n some countries, already IRFA during the reporting year high risk of infection, USCIRF urged marginalized religious minorities faced and provides recommendations governments to release all prison- to bolster overall U.S. efforts to ers held because of their religion official and/or societal stigmatization, advance freedom of religion or or belief as part of their COVID- harassment, and discrimination for allegedly belief abroad. It also includes 19 response. On a positive note, causing or spreading the virus. a section discussing key trends some governments that have long and developments in religious repressed religious freedom, such freedom globally during the as Eritrea, did release religious pris- reporting period, including in oners. By contrast, Iran, which reportedly furloughed 85,000 prisoners countries that are not recommended for CPC or SWL status. This for health reasons, also incarcerated others, especially members of the year, that section covers COVID-19 and religious freedom, attacks Baha’i community, and placed prisoners from the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Interdisciplinary Journal of Research on Religion
    ISSN 1556-3723 (print) Interdisciplinary Journal of Research on Religion __________________________________________________________________ Volume 9 2013 Article 13 __________________________________________________________________ Deregulation and Demographic Change: A Key to Understanding Whether Religious Plurality Leads to Strife Brian J. Grim* Pew Research Center’s Religion & Public Life Project Washington, D.C. Vegard Skirbekk International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis Vienna, Austria Jesus Crespo Cuaresma Vienna University of Economics and Business Vienna, Austria *[email protected] Copyright © 2013 Interdisciplinary Journal of Research on Religion. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. The Interdisciplinary Journal of Research on Religion is freely available on the World Wide Web at http://www.religjournal.com. Deregulation and Demographic Change: A Key to Understanding Whether Religious Plurality Leads to Strife Brian J. Grim Pew Research Center’s Forum on Religion & Public Life Washington, D.C. Vegard Skirbekk International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis Vienna, Austria Jesus Crespo Cuaresma Vienna University of Economics and Business Vienna, Austria Abstract Using a new cross-country dataset, we test and extend the religious economies perspective on reli- gious conflict in two ways. First, we expand earlier analyses of whether religious pluralities lead to more or less conflict. Second, we assess the apparent demographic anomaly that high popula- tion growth is often found not to contribute to higher levels of violent religious persecution and conflict. We introduce a new demographic measure that captures the net effect of the demographic transition rather than just recent population growth dynamics, thus concentrating on differences in long-term population growth patterns.
    [Show full text]
  • Treating Religious Trauma and Spiritual Harm with Combined Therapy
    group, Vol. 37, No. 4, Winter 2013 Thou Shalt Not: Treating Religious Trauma and Spiritual Harm With Combined Therapy Alyson M. Stone1,2 That religion can be a source of harm and trauma is something most clinicians know well, yet this fact is underreported in the literature. Indeed, most of the existing research indicates a positive link between religion and mental health. There is likewise little information on spirituality’s impact on mental health when it is used to bypass prob- lems, feelings, and needs. This article addresses this deficit by exploring the potentially harmful effects of religion and spirituality. It highlights the role of secure attachment and the combination of individual and group therapy to treat religious trauma and spiritual struggles. KEYWORDS: Religion; religious trauma; spirituality; spiritual bypassing. The psychological impact of religion has long been ignored by academic psychol- ogy (Belzen, 2000; Paloutzian & Park, 2005). Change is afoot, however, and the last several decades have seen a surge of research in this area, which generally shows a positive relationship between religion and mental health (Seybold & Hill, 2001). By contrast, there are relatively few references to religion’s negative impact and virtually no references to religious trauma. In fact, a search for articles on “religious trauma” yields studies on the use of religion to recover from trauma rather than religion as a source of trauma. Popular literature, conversely, contains many books on spiritual and religious abuse and manipulation, religious addiction, and toxic faith (Plante, 2004; Purcell, 2008; Winell, 1993; Wright, 2001). This disparity suggests that the professional literature does not yet accurately reflect the potentially harmful im- pact of religion and spirituality or the abundance of concerns people have in these 1 The author would like to thank Ronnie Levine, Jeff Hudson, and Stacy Nakell for their generous feedback and support.
    [Show full text]
  • Islamophobia and Religious Intolerance: Threats to Global Peace and Harmonious Co-Existence
    Qudus International Journal of Islamic Studies (QIJIS) Volume 8, Number 2, 2020 DOI : 10.21043/qijis.v8i2.6811 ISLAMOPHOBIA AND RELIGIOUS INTOLERANCE: THREATS TO GLOBAL PEACE AND HARMONIOUS CO-EXISTENCE Kazeem Oluwaseun DAUDA National Open University of Nigeria (NOUN), Jabi-Abuja, Nigeria Consultant, FARKAZ Technologies & Education Consulting Int’l, Ijebu-Ode [email protected] Abstract Recent events show that there are heightened fear, hostilities, prejudices and discriminations associated with religion in virtually every part of the world. It becomes almost impossible to watch news daily without scenes of religious intolerance and violence with dire consequences for societal peace. This paper examines the trends, causes and implications of Islamophobia and religious intolerance for global peace and harmonious co-existence. It relies on content analysis of secondary sources of data. It notes that fear and hatred associated with Islām and persecution of Muslims is the fallout of religious intolerance as reflected in most melee and growingverbal attacks, trends anti-Muslim of far-right hatred,or right-wing racism, extremists xenophobia,. It revealsanti-Sharī’ah that Islamophobia policies, high-profile and religious terrorist intolerance attacks, have and loss of lives, wanton destruction of property, violation led to proliferation of attacks on Muslims, incessant of Muslims’ fundamental rights and freedom, rising fear of insecurity, and distrust between Muslims and QIJIS, Vol. 8, No. 2, 2020 257 Kazeem Oluwaseun DAUDA The paper concludes that escalating Islamophobic attacks and religious intolerance globally hadnon-Muslims. constituted a serious threat to world peace and harmonious co-existence. Relevant resolutions in curbing rising trends of Islamophobia and religious intolerance are suggested.
    [Show full text]
  • Nationalism in Ottoman Greater Syria 1840-1914 the Divisive Legacy of Sectarianism
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Calhoun, Institutional Archive of the Naval Postgraduate School Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 2008-12 Nationalism in Ottoman Greater Syria 1840-1914 the divisive legacy of Sectarianism Francioch, Gregory A. Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School http://hdl.handle.net/10945/3850 NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA THESIS NATIONALISM IN OTTOMAN GREATER SYRIA 1840- 1914: THE DIVISIVE LEGACY OF SECTARIANISM by Gregory A. Francioch December 2008 Thesis Advisor: Anne Marie Baylouny Second Reader: Boris Keyser Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instruction, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188) Washington DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED December 2008 Master’s Thesis 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE Nationalism in Ottoman Greater Syria 1840- 5. FUNDING NUMBERS 1914: The Divisive Legacy of Sectarianism 6. AUTHOR(S) Greg Francioch 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Inquiry Into the Status of the Human Right to Freedom of Religion Or Belief
    Inquiry into the status of the Human Right to Freedom of Religion or Belief Submission: Inquiry into the status of the human right to freedom of religion or belief This purpose of this submission is to raise the committee’s awareness that Islam: - militates against “the enjoyment of freedom of religion or belief” - incites to “violations or abuses” of religious freedom - is antithetical and inimical to the “protection and promotion of freedom of religion or belief” Any inquiry into “the human right to freedom of religion or belief” which avoids examining arguably the largest global threat to those freedoms would be abdicating its responsibility to fully inform its stakeholders. Whether it is the nine Islamic countries in the top ten of the World Watch List of Christian Persecution(1), crucifix-wearing “Christians in Sydney fac(ing) growing persecution at the hands of Muslim gangs”(2) or the summary execution of those who blaspheme or apostatise(3), Islam, in practice and in doctrine, militates against “the human right to freedom of religion or belief”. The purpose of this submission is not to illustrate “the nature and extent of (Islamic) violations and abuses of this right” [which are well-documented elsewhere(4)] but to draw the committee’s attention to the Islamic doctrinal “causes of those violations or abuses”. An informed understanding of Islam is crucial to effectively addressing potential future conflicts between Islamic teachings which impact negatively on “freedom of religion or belief” and those Western freedoms we had almost come to take for granted, until Islam came along to remind us that they must be ever fought for.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Orientation | Kurmanji
    KURMANJI A Kurdish village, Palangan, Kurdistan Flickr / Ninara DLIFLC DEFENSE LANGUAGE INSTITUTE FOREIGN LANGUAGE CENTER 2018 CULTURAL ORIENTATION | KURMANJI TABLE OF CONTENTS Profile Introduction ................................................................................................................... 5 Government .................................................................................................................. 6 Iraqi Kurdistan ......................................................................................................7 Iran .........................................................................................................................8 Syria .......................................................................................................................8 Turkey ....................................................................................................................9 Geography ................................................................................................................... 9 Bodies of Water ...........................................................................................................10 Lake Van .............................................................................................................10 Climate ..........................................................................................................................11 History ...........................................................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • Government Interference in Religious Institutions and Terrorism Peter S. Henne Assistant Professor Department of Political Scien
    0 Government interference in religious institutions and terrorism Peter S. Henne Assistant Professor Department of Political Science/Global and Regional Studies Program University of Vermont [email protected] 1 Abstract: Many states have adopted policies that monitor or attempt to control religious institutions in various ways. This ranges from limiting foreign born clerics to approving the sermons presented in these institutions. These policies are often justified as measures to limit religious strife or terrorism by minimizing extremism in the country. Are they effective? Or are they counterproductive, and promote resentment and violence? Using data from the Religion and State dataset and the Global Terrorism Database, I find that intensified government interference in religious institutions can lead to an increase in terrorism in a country. Bio: Peter S. Henne is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Political Science and the Global and Regional Studies Program at the University of Vermont. He received his Ph.D in Government from Georgetown University, and B.A. in Political Science from Vassar College. His first book, Islamic Politics, Muslim States and Counterterrorism Tensions, was published in 2017 by Cambridge University Press. After the 2013 coup in Egypt, the new regime intensified state control of mosques throughout the country. 1 Government officials shut down mosques that did not have official approval and banned their clerics from preaching. The regime claimed the new policies were intended to counter extremist voices and prevent terrorist threats from arising (Economist 2014). Critics, however, saw these actions as infringements on human rights and a means to undermine political opposition (Economist 2014).
    [Show full text]
  • Katie Russell Issue Brief: Native Americans and Minority Religion Keywords: Native Americans, Religious Freedom, First Amendment
    Katie Russell Issue Brief: Native Americans and Minority Religion Keywords: Native Americans, Religious Freedom, First Amendment Rights, Religious Freedom Restoration Act, Christianity, Native American Religions Description: The following brief describes religious affiliation of Native Americans, with an emphasis on historical movements and legal difficulties that have impacted Native Americans religious identity (i.e. religious freedom). Additionally, current religious freedom struggles are addressed. Key Points: • Native Americans have historically struggled to obtain First Amendment rights related to religious freedom; this is due in part to their unconventional citizenship status. • The federal government’s historically meddlesome approach to Native American religious tradition has greatly influenced Native American’s form of worship, causing a departure from traditional Native American religions and shift towards Christianity. • The federal government resettled Indians, outlawed the practice of native religion, and put into place a series of assimilation programs until the creation of the New Deal in 1933 (which revoked many of these limitations). • Native Americans had the majority of their religious rights formally restored to them with the enactment of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act in the 1990’s. • Today, Native American’s primary religious struggles are to gain access to sacred sites and have sacred artifacts returned. They also face many opponents of their use of controversial items such as peyote and eagle feathers in rituals, despite being legally permitted to utilize these goods. Issue Brief: According to the 2010 United States Census, Native Americans make up approximately 1.7% of the population (5.4 million people) (Yurth). It is approximated that 9000 people, or less than 1% of this population, solely practice Native American religions which often incorporates a variety of ceremonies and symbolism focused on animalism (Ratts & Pedersen, 159).
    [Show full text]
  • Religion and Belief in Higher Education: the Experiences of Staff and Students Equality Challenge Unit
    Religion and belief in higher education: the experiences of staff and students Equality Challenge Unit This report was Acknowledgments researched and written by Professor Paul Weller of The team would like to thank colleagues in the International Centre for Guidance Studies, stakeholders, staff and students the Society, Religion and in the HEIs who supported and contributed to the project. Belief Research Group, Particular thanks go to Dr Kristin Aune, Lesley Gyford, Professor University of Derby, Dennis Hayes, Dr Phil Henry, Sukhi Kainth and Heather Morgan. and Dr Tristram Hooley and Nicki Moore of the The following organisations have provided ongoing support: International Centre = All-Party Parliamentary Group Against Antisemitism for Guidance Studies, = Church of England Board of Education University of Derby. = Community Security Trust = Federation of Student Islamic Societies = GuildHE = Higher Education Equal Opportunities Network = Hindu Forum of Britain = Inter Faith Network for the UK = National Federation of Atheist, Humanist and Secular Student Societies = National Hindu Students Forum = National Union of Students = Network of Buddhist Organisations (UK) = Student Christian Movement = Three Faiths Forum = UK Council for International Student Affairs = Union of Jewish Students = Universities UK = University and College Union = Young Jains Contact Chris Brill Dr Tristram Hooley [email protected] [email protected] Religion and belief in higher education: the experiences of staff and students Contents Executive summary 1 Recommendations
    [Show full text]
  • The Nature of Islamophobia: a Test of a Tripartite View in Five Countries
    Please note: This is a preprint for an article accepted for publication with PSPB. It may be subject to editing and other changes. The nature of Islamophobia: A test of a tripartite view in five countries Fatih Uenal1,2*, Robin Bergh1, Jim Sidanius1, Andreas Zick3, Sasha Kimel4, and Jonas R. Kunst5,6 1 Department of Psychology, Harvard University 2 Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge 3 IKG, University of Bielefeld 4 Department of Psychology, California State University San Marcos 5 Department of Psychology, University of Oslo 6 Center for research on extremism, University of Oslo *Corresponding author Please direct correspondence to Dr. Fatih Uenal, Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Old Cavendish Building, Free School Lane, CB2 3RQ, Cambridge, UK, E-mail: [email protected] Word count: 9999 (Excluding title page, tables and figures) Conflict of Interest: None Ethical Approval: This Study partly was approved by Harvard University-Area Committee on the Use of Human Subject (IRB 16-1810). Data Sharing: Please contact the PI for data accessibility. Preregistration: asPredicted #20961 (http://aspredicted.org/blind.php?x=6sk9gm) Acknowledgements: The research was supported, in part, by a post-doctoral stipend from the Humboldt University Berlin within the Excellence Initiative of the states and the federal government (German Research Foundation). We also want to thank the reviewers and editor for their helpful comments. Page 1 of 256 Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin Running head: NATURE OF ISLAMOPHOBIA 1 1 2 3 Abstract 4 5 6 This article provides an examination of the structure of Islamophobia across cultures. Our novel 7 8 measure – the Tripartite Islamophobia Scale (TIS) – embeds three theoretically and statistically 9 10 grounded subcomponents of Islamophobia: anti-Muslim prejudice, anti-Islamic sentiment, and 11 12 conspiracy beliefs.
    [Show full text]
  • Sunni Suicide Attacks and Sectarian Violence
    Terrorism and Political Violence ISSN: 0954-6553 (Print) 1556-1836 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ftpv20 Sunni Suicide Attacks and Sectarian Violence Seung-Whan Choi & Benjamin Acosta To cite this article: Seung-Whan Choi & Benjamin Acosta (2018): Sunni Suicide Attacks and Sectarian Violence, Terrorism and Political Violence, DOI: 10.1080/09546553.2018.1472585 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2018.1472585 Published online: 13 Jun 2018. Submit your article to this journal View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=ftpv20 TERRORISM AND POLITICAL VIOLENCE https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2018.1472585 Sunni Suicide Attacks and Sectarian Violence Seung-Whan Choi c and Benjamin Acosta a,b aInterdisciplinary Center Herzliya, Herzliya, Israel; bInternational Institute for Counter-Terrorism, Herzliya, Israel; cPolitical Science, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA ABSTRACT KEY WORDS Although fundamentalist Sunni Muslims have committed more than Suicide attacks; sectarian 85% of all suicide attacks, empirical research has yet to examine how violence; Sunni militants; internal sectarian conflicts in the Islamic world have fueled the most jihad; internal conflict dangerous form of political violence. We contend that fundamentalist Sunni Muslims employ suicide attacks as a political tool in sectarian violence and this targeting dynamic marks a central facet of the phenomenon today. We conduct a large-n analysis, evaluating an original dataset of 6,224 suicide attacks during the period of 1980 through 2016. A series of logistic regression analyses at the incidence level shows that, ceteris paribus, sectarian violence between Sunni Muslims and non-Sunni Muslims emerges as a substantive, signifi- cant, and positive predictor of suicide attacks.
    [Show full text]
  • 2013 Annual Report
    EGYPT U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom: 2013 Annual Report Bottom Line: Despite some progress during a turbulent political transition, the Egyptian government has failed or been slow to protect religious minorities, particularly Coptic Orthodox Christians from violence. It continues to prosecute, convict, and imprison Egyptian citizens, including Copts and dissenting Muslims, for “contempt” or “defamation” of religion. The newly-adopted constitution includes several problematic provisions relevant to religious freedom and related human rights. Despite some improvements, the Egyptian government continues to engage in and tolerate systematic, ongoing, and egregious violations of freedom of religious freedom. It is unclear how much the current government could do to effectively address the ongoing violence and continuing climate of impunity in the country even if it had the genuine desire to do so. Discriminatory and repressive laws and policies remain that restrict freedom of thought, conscience and religion or belief. For the third year in a row, USCIRF recommends in 2013 that Egypt be designated a “country of particular concern,” or CPC, under the 1998 International Religious Freedom Act (IRFA). Background In January 2012, the Supreme Council of Armed Forces (SCAF) announced it would be lifting the Emergency Law except in cases of “thuggery,” although it did not define that term. Because Egypt has long operated under a state of emergency, the government has had the option to hear cases involving terrorism or drug trafficking in state security courts rather than criminal courts. Finally on May 31 the State of Emergency expired and the Emergency Law was lifted completely. The Emergency Law restricted many human rights, including freedom of religion or belief, as well as freedom of expression, assembly, and association.
    [Show full text]