FAA Order 7110.10Y, Flight Services

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

FAA Order 7110.10Y, Flight Services U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION JO 7110.10Y CHANGE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION CHG 2 Air Traffic Organization Policy Effective Date: November 10, 2016 SUBJ: Flight Services 1. Purpose of This Change. This change transmits revised pages to Federal Aviation Administration Order JO 7110.10Y, Flight Services, and the Briefing Guide. 2. Audience. This change applies to select offices in Washington headquarters, service area offices, the William J. Hughes Technical Center, the Mike Monroney Aeronautical Center, and to all air traffic field facilities, international aviation field offices, and the interested aviation public. 3. Where Can I Find This Change? This change is available on the FAA Web site at http://faa.gov/air_traffic/publications and http://employees.faa.gov/tools_resources/orders_ notices/. 4. Explanation of Policy Change. See the Explanation of Changes attachment which has editorial corrections and changes submitted through normal procedures. The Briefing Guide lists only new or modified material, along with background. 5. Distribution. This change is distributed to select offices in Washington headquarters, service area offices, the William J. Hughes Technical Center, the Mike Monroney Aeronautical Center, and to all air traffic field facilities, international aviation field offices, and the interested aviation public. 6. Disposition of Transmittal. Retain this transmittal until superseded by a new basic order. 7. Page Control Chart. See the page control chart attachment. Distribution: ZAT-793; ZAT-464; Initiated By: AJR-0 ZAT-423 (External) Vice President, System Operations Services 11/10/16 JO 7110.10Y CHG 2 Flight Services Explanation of Changes Change 2 Direct questions through appropriate facility/service center office staff to the Office of Primary Interest (OPI) a. 1−1−7. DELIVERY DATES rates N JO 1720.91, Electronic Access to Opera- 1−1−10. DISTRIBUTION tionally Significant ATO Directives, dated 7/1/16. b. 5-2-13. AIRCRAFT BOMB THREATS This change reflects that hard copy dissemination of This change updates the phone number for the this order has been discontinued. All organizations Domestic Events Network (DEN). will now be responsible for viewing, downloading, and subscribing to receive electronic mail notifica- c. Entire Publication tions when changes occur to this order. Paid Additional editorial/format changes were made subscription service is available for those audiences where necessary. Revision bars were not used that require printed material. This change incorpo- because of the insignificant nature of these changes. Explanation of Changes E of C−1 11/10/16 JO 7110.10Y CHG 2 PAGE CONTROL CHART REMOVE PAGES DATED INSERT PAGES DATED 1−1−1 and 1−1−2 ...................... 12/10/15 1−1−1 and 1−1−2 ..................... 11/10/16 5−2−3 through 5−2−5................... 12/10/15 5−2−3 through 5−2−5.................. 11/10/16 PCG−1 and PCG−2 .................... 05/26/16 PCG−1 and PCG−2 ................... 11/10/16 PCG A−13 ........................... 05/26/16 PCG A−13 .......................... 11/10/16 PCG A−14 ........................... 05/26/16 PCG A−14 .......................... 05/26/16 PCG C−3 through PCG C−9 ............. 05/26/16 PCG C−3 through PCG C−9 ............ 11/10/16 PCG D−1 ............................ 12/10/15 PCG D−1 ........................... 11/10/16 PCG D−2 and PCG D−3 ................ 05/26/16 PCG D−2 and PCG D−3 ............... 11/10/16 PCG D−4 ............................ 12/10/15 PCG D−4 ........................... 11/10/16 PCG E−1 and PCG E−2 ................. 05/26/16 PCG E−1 and PCG E−2 ................ 11/10/16 PCG I−5 ............................. 05/26/16 PCG I−5 ............................ 05/26/16 PCG I−6 ............................. 05/26/16 PCG I−6 ............................ 11/10/16 PCG M−3 ............................ 12/10/15 PCG M−3 ........................... 12/10/16 PCG M−4 through PCG M−6 ............ 12/10/15 PCG M−4 through PCG M−6 ........... 11/10/16 PCG N−1 through PCG N−4 ............. 05/26/16 PCG N−1 through PCG N−4 ............ 11/10/16 PCG O−1 ............................ 12/10/15 PCG O−1 ........................... 12/10/15 PCG O−2 ............................ 05/26/16 PCG O−2 ........................... 11/10/16 PCG O−3 and PCG O−4 ................ 12/10/15 PCG O−3 and PCG O−4 ............... 11/10/16 PCG W−1............................ 05/26/16 PCG W−1........................... 11/10/16 PCG W−2............................ 05/26/16 PCG W−2........................... 05/26/16 Page Control Chart i 11/10/1612/10/15 JO 7110.10YJO 7110.10Y CHG 2 Chapter 1. General Section 1. Introduction 1−1−1. PURPOSE OF THIS ORDER Publication Schedule Basic This order prescribes procedures and phraseology for Cutoff Date Effective Date or use by air traffic personnel providing flight services. for Submission of Publication Flight service specialists are required to be familiar Change with the provisions of this order that pertain to their JO 7110.10Y 6/25/15 12/10/15 operational responsibilities and to exercise their best Change 1 12/10/15 5/26/16 judgment if they encounter situations that are not covered. Change 2 5/26/16 11/10/16 Change 3 11/10/16 4/27/17 1−1−2. AUDIENCE JO 7110.10Z 4/27/17 10/12/17 This order applies to all ATO personnel and anyone 1−1−7. DELIVERY DATES using ATO directives. This order will be available on the FAA’s website 30 days prior to its effective date. 1−1−3. WHERE TO FIND THIS ORDER All organizations are responsible for viewing, This order is available on the FAA Web site at downloading, and subscribing to receive electronic http://faa.gov/air_traffic/publications and http://em- mail notifications when changes occur to this order. ployees.faa.gov/tools_resources/orders_notices/. Subscriptions can be made at http:/www.faa.gov/ air_traffic/publications/. 1−1−4. WHAT THIS ORDER CANCELS 1−1−8. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PROCEDURAL CHANGES FAA Order 7110.10X, Flight Services, dated April 3,2014, and all changes to it are canceled. The responsibility associated with processing and coordinating revisions to this order is delegated to the Director, Air Traffic Procedures, AJV-8. 1−1−5. EXPLANATION OF CHANGES a. Personnel should submit recommended changes in procedures to facility management. The significant changes to this order are identified in the Explanation of Changes page(s). It is advisable to b. Recommendations from other sources should retain the page(s) throughout the duration of the basic be submitted through appropriate FAA, military, or order. If further information is desired, direct industry/user channels. questions through the appropriate facility/service c. Proposed changes must be submitted area office staff to Flight Services Safety and electronically to the Air Traffic Procedures Operations Policy Group. Correspondence Mailbox at 9−AJV−8−HQ−[email protected]. The submission should include a description of the 1−1−6. SUBMISSION CUTOFF AND recommended change and the proposed language to EFFECTIVE DATES be used in the order. This order and its changes are scheduled to be d. Procedural changes will not be made to this published to coincide with AIRAC dates. The order until the operational system software has been effective dates will be: adapted to accomplish the revised procedures. Introduction 1−1−1 JO7110.65RJO 7110.10Y7110.10Y CHG CHG 2 2 12/10/1511/10/163/15/07 1−1−9. SUBSCRIPTION INFORMATION 1−1−10. DISTRIBUTION This publication may be purchased from the U.S. This order is available online and will be distributed Government Printing Office. Address subscription electronically to all offices that subscribe to receive inquiries to: email notification/access to it through the FAA’s Superintendent of Documents website (http://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publica- U.S. Government Printing Office tions/). P.O. Box 979050 St. Louis, MO 63197−9000 Online: http://bookstore.gpo.gov FAA air traffic publications are also available on the FAA’s web site at: http://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/ publications/ 1−1−2 Introduction 11/10/1612/10/15 JO 7110.10YJO 7110.10Y CHG 2 a. Obtain the aircraft’s identification and current 5−2−12. MINIMUM FUEL position, and advise the person in charge of the watch If an aircraft declares a state of “minimum fuel,” of the pilot’s request. inform any facility to whom control jurisdiction is b. Relay the pilot’s request to the FAA transferred of the minimum fuel problem and be alert Washington Operations Center, AEO-100, (202) for any occurrence which might delay the aircraft en 267-3333, and provide the aircraft identification and route. position. NOTE− Use of the term “minimum fuel” indicates recognition by c. AEO-100 will provide the nearest location. a pilot that the fuel supply has reached a state whereupon Have AEO-100 standby while the information is reaching destination, any undue delay cannot be relayed to the pilot. accepted. This is not an emergency situation but merely an advisory that indicates an emergency situation is possible d. If the pilot wishes to divert to the airport should any undue delay occur. A minimum fuel advisory location provided, obtain an estimated arrival time does not imply a need for traffic priority. Common sense from the pilot, and advise the person in charge of the and good judgment will determine the extent of assistance watch. to be given in minimum fuel situations. If, at any time, the remaining usable fuel supply suggests the need for traffic e. After the aircraft destination has been priority to ensure a safe landing, the pilot should declare determined, provide the estimated arrival time to an emergency and report fuel remaining in minutes. AEO-100. AEO−100 will then notify the appropriate airport authority at the diversion airport.
Recommended publications
  • Glossary of Terms
    Appendix A Glossary of Terms ABOVE GROUND LEVEL (AGL): An elevation datum given in feet above ground level. AIR CARRIER: A person who undertakes directly by lease, or other arrangement, to engage in air transportation. (FAR 1) (Also see Certificated Air Carrier) AIR CARRIERS: The commercial system of air transportation, consisting of the certificated air carriers, air taxis (including commuters), supplemental air carriers, commercial operators of large aircraft, and air travel clubs. (FAA Census) AIR ROUTE TRAFFIC CONTROL CENTER (ARTCC): A facility established to provide air traffic control service to aircraft operating on IFR flight plans within controlled airspace, principally during the en route phase of flight. When equipment capabilities and controller workload permit, certain advisory/assistance services may be provided to VFR aircraft. (AIM) AIR TAXI: A classification of air carriers which directly engage in the air transportation of persons, property, mail, or in any combination of such transportation and which do not directly or indirectly utilize large aircraft (over 30 seats or a maximum payload capacity of more than 7,500 pounds) and do not hold a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity or economic authority issued by the Department of Transportation. (Also see commuter air carrier and demand air taxi.) (FAA Census) AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL (ATC): A service operated by appropriate authority to promote the safe, orderly, and expeditious flow of air traffic. (FAR 1) AIRCRAFT ACCIDENT: An occurrence associated with the operation of an aircraft which takes place between the time any person boards the aircraft with the intention of flight and all such persons have disembarked, and in which any person suffers death or serious injury, or in which the aircraft receives substantial damage.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Communications Commission § 80.110
    SUBCHAPTER D—SAFETY AND SPECIAL RADIO SERVICES PART 80—STATIONS IN THE 80.71 Operating controls for stations on land. MARITIME SERVICES 80.72 Antenna requirements for coast sta- tions. Subpart A—General Information 80.74 Public coast station facilities for a te- lephony busy signal. GENERAL 80.76 Requirements for land station control Sec. points. 80.1 Basis and purpose. 80.2 Other regulations that apply. STATION REQUIREMENTS—SHIP STATIONS 80.3 Other applicable rule parts of this chap- 80.79 Inspection of ship station by a foreign ter. Government. 80.5 Definitions. 80.80 Operating controls for ship stations. 80.7 Incorporation by reference. 80.81 Antenna requirements for ship sta- tions. Subpart B—Applications and Licenses 80.83 Protection from potentially hazardous RF radiation. 80.11 Scope. 80.13 Station license required. OPERATING PROCEDURES—GENERAL 80.15 Eligibility for station license. 80.17 Administrative classes of stations. 80.86 International regulations applicable. 80.21 Supplemental information required. 80.87 Cooperative use of frequency assign- 80.25 License term. ments. 80.31 Cancellation of license. 80.88 Secrecy of communication. 80.37 One authorization for a plurality of 80.89 Unauthorized transmissions. stations. 80.90 Suspension of transmission. 80.39 Authorized station location. 80.91 Order of priority of communications. 80.41 Control points and dispatch points. 80.92 Prevention of interference. 80.43 Equipment acceptable for licensing. 80.93 Hours of service. 80.45 Frequencies. 80.94 Control by coast or Government sta- 80.47 Operation during emergency. tion. 80.49 Construction and regional service re- 80.95 Message charges.
    [Show full text]
  • Instrument Landing System and Its Requirement in India
    JOURNAL OF CRITICAL REVIEWS ISSN- 2394-5125 VOL 7, ISSUE 14, 2020 INSTRUMENT LANDING SYSTEM AND ITS REQUIREMENT IN INDIA Shivendra Shrivastava1, Rahul Kumar Verma2, Gp Capt M Shrivastava3 1,2Amity University, Noida 3Air Force [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Abstract: The ILS is a navigational aid invented in the forties it helps aircrafts in landing. The pilots still consider the ILS as one of the most reliable means of guidance it continues to be used around the world. This paper examines what is an ILS its categories, components and the relevance of ILS in India. Since all Indian airports do not have ILS it causes disruption of flights, passenger discomfort and loss of business. The ILS has been compared with other advance systems of navigation in the market. Considering seamless movement of flights a necessity for business and development of India, the paper proposes ILS/GAGAN installation at all Indian airports. Key words - ILS, Localizer, Glide slope, Yagi antenna. BACKGROUND The development of an instrument landing system (ILS) began during World War I in the twenties but it was not until the thirties that some substantial research was carried out. The airports used to fire flares to guide the commercial airliners. There was a lot of research work carried out by USA and UK from 1930 to 1947 in developing a system in order to land aircrafts safely in low visibility conditions. This was a direct outcome of World War 2 since during the war the USAF bombers could not carry out bombing over Europe in foggy weather conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • NAV/COMM TEST SET, IFR-4000, Operation Manual
    NAV/COMM TEST SET IFR-4000 Operation Manual This page intentionally left blank. OPERATION MANUAL NAV/COMM TEST SET IFR 4000 PUBLISHED BY VIAVI Solutions, Inc. COPYRIGHT VIAVI Solutions, Inc. 2019 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior permission of the publisher. Reissued Jan 2010 Issue-2 Mar 2010 Issue-3 Sep 2011 Issue-4 Jul 2015 Issue-5 Nov 2019 Electromagnetic Compatibility: For continued EMC compliance, all external cables must be shielded and three meters or less in length. Nomenclature Statement: In this manual IFR 4000, 4000, Test Set or Unit refers to the IFR 4000 NAV/COMM Test Set. Product Warranty Refer to http://www.viavisolutions.com/en-us/warranty-information for the Product Warranty information. THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK. SAFETY FIRST: TO ALL OPERATIONS PERSONNEL REFER ALL SERVICING OF UNIT TO QUALIFIED TECHNICAL PERSONNEL. THIS UNIT CONTAINS NO OPERATOR SERVICEABLE PARTS. WARNING: USING THIS EQUIPMENT IN A MANNER NOT SPECIFIED BY THE ACCOMPANYING DOCUMENTATION MAY IMPAIR THE SAFETY PROTECTION PROVIDED BY THE EQUIPMENT. CASE, COVER OR PANEL REMOVAL Opening the Case Assembly exposes the operator to electrical hazards that can result in electrical shock or equipment damage. Do not operate this Test Set with the Case Assembly open. SAFETY IDENTIFICATION IN TECHNICAL MANUAL This manual uses the following terms to draw attention to possible safety hazards, that may exist when operating or servicing this equipment. CAUTION: THIS TERM IDENTIFIES CONDITIONS OR ACTIVITIES THAT, IF IGNORED, CAN RESULT IN EQUIPMENT OR PROPERTY DAMAGE (E.G., FIRE).
    [Show full text]
  • IFR Approaches Briefing
    IFR Approaches Briefing 1. Name the various segments of a typical instrument approach and the purpose of each segment. 2. What does the notation "NoPt" on an approach chart meant? 3. If a standard procedure turn is shown, what types of course reversals are authorized? 4. What type of course reversal is authorized if a teardrop PT or holding pattern in-lieu-of a PT is shown? 5. What does the absence of a procedure turn depiction on an approach chart indicate? 6. What does the phrase "...cleared for straight-in approach" mean? 7. Where is the MAP on a precision approach and on a non-precision approach? 8. If timing information is not provided to identify the MAP on a non- precision approach, how is the MAP determined. 9. Where do you normlly begin timing for the map when you are flying a VOR approach using an off-airport facility? 10. What is the minimum aircraft equipment required for an ILS approach? 11. What is the lowest possible DA and visibility for a category I ILS Page 1 of 4 approach? 12. What equipment must be operational for you to use those minimums? 13. Where are the various marker beacons located? 14. As you pass over each marker beacon, what Morse code will you hear, and what color of light will illuminate on the marker beacon receiver? 15. What is the sensitivity of the CDI responding to a localizer signal compared to a VOR signal? 16. What are the correct procedures for using pitch and power when you fly ILS approach? 17.
    [Show full text]
  • A Tdma Broadcast Satellite / Ground Architecture for the Aeronautical Telecommunications Network
    A TDMA BROADCAST SATELLITE / GROUND ARCHITECTURE FOR THE AERONAUTICAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS NETWORK Mohammed A. Shamma, Rajesh S. Raghavan Analex Corporation, Cleveland, OH 44142 Contract NAS3-00145, NASA Glenn Research Center Abstract: An initial evaluation of a TDMA research stage [ 11. Several communication satellite broadcast architecture with an links, technologies, and architectures were integrated ground network is proposed in considered which differ in complexity, cost, this study as one option for the Aeronautical and the time frame for its implementation. Telecommunications Network (ATN). The Here we are proposing an architecture based architecture proposed consists of a ground on the following objectives: based network that is dedicated to the - Cost: A system that takes into reception and transmissions of Automatic account the initial cost of Dependent Surveillance Broadcast (ADS-B) implementation. Considering the messages from Mode-S or UAT type fact that such architectures are not systems, along with tracks from primary and mass produced, the initial cost secondary surveillance radars. Additionally, will likely determine the expected the ground network could contain VHF final costs. Digital Link Mode 2, 3 or 4 transceivers for - New but tested technologies: In this the reception and transmissions of we mean a system that relies on Controller-Pilot Data Link Communications technologies that are new but (CPDLC) messages and for voice. The already tested as oppose to being second part of the ATN network consists of in the initial research stage. Also a broadcast satellite based system that is minimum use of what is defined mainly dedicated for the transmission of as older technologies is assumed. surveillance data as well as En-route Flight - Enough Room for Technology Information Service Broadcast (FIS-B) to all growth: while the cost and the aircraft.
    [Show full text]
  • Diamond DA40/40F
    Integrated Flight Deck Cockpit Reference Guide Diamond DA40/40F SYSTEM OVERVIEW FLIGHT INSTRUMENTS ENGINE INDICATION SYSTEM NAV/COM/TRANSPONDER AUDIO PANEL AUTOMATIC FLIGHT CONTROL NAVIGATION FLIGHT PLANNING PROCEDURES HAZARD AVOIDANCE ABNORMAL OPERATIONS ANNUNCIATIONS & ALERTS INDEX Copyright © 2004-2007 Garmin Ltd. or its subsidiaries. All rights reserved. This manual reflects the operation of System Software version 0369.13 or later for the Diamond DA40 and DA40F. Some differences in operation may be observed when comparing the information in this manual to earlier or later software versions. Garmin International, Inc., 1200 East 151st Street, Olathe, Kansas 66062, U.S.A. Tel: 913/397.8200 Fax: 913/397.8282 Garmin AT, Inc., 2345 Turner Road SE, Salem, OR 97302, U.S.A. Tel: 503/391.3411 Fax 503/364.2138 Garmin (Europe) Ltd, Liberty House, Hounsdown Business Park, Southampton, SO40 9RB, U.K. Tel: 44/0870.8501241 Fax: 44/0870.8501251 Garmin Corporation, No. 68, Jangshu 2nd Road, Shijr, Taipei County, Taiwan Tel: 886/02.2642.9199 Fax: 886/02.2642.9099 Web Site Address: www.garmin.com Except as expressly provided herein, no part of this manual may be reproduced, copied, transmitted, disseminated, downloaded or stored in any storage medium, for any purpose without the express written permission of Garmin. Garmin hereby grants permission to download a single copy of this manual and of any revision to this manual onto a hard drive or other electronic storage medium to be viewed for personal use, provided that such electronic or printed copy of this manual or revision must contain the complete text of this copyright notice and provided further that any unauthorized commercial distribution of this manual or any revision hereto is strictly prohibited.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on Agenda Item 6
    AMCP/7-WP/81 29/3/00 AERONAUTICAL MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS PANEL (AMCP) SEVENTH MEETING Montreal, 22 to 30 March 2000 Agenda Item 6: Development of relevant material for the ITU WRC-2000 (May 2000) REPORT ON AGENDA ITEM 6 The attached constitutes the report on Agenda Item 6 and should be inserted at the appropriate place in the yellow report folder. (26 pages) amcp.7.wp.081.ycr6.wpd AMCP/7-WP/81 Report on Agenda Item 6 6-1 Agenda Item 6: Development of relevant material for the ITU WRC-2000 (May 2000) 6.1 INTRODUCTION 6.1.1 The meeting reviewed under this agenda item the report from Working Group F which met from 21 to 24 March 2000 in Montreal, Canada. 6.1.2 It was recalled that, since AMCP/6, Working Group F had held three meetings: a) 5 - 14 May 1999 in Bangkok, Thailand; b) 19 - 26 October 1999 in Dakar, Senegal; and c) 21 - 24 March 2000 in Montreal, Canada. 6.1.3 The Rapporteur of Working Group F was Mr. S. Mitchell from the United Kingdom. 6.1.4 The results of the meetings held in Bangkok and Dakar were presented directly to the Air Navigation Commission and/or the Council as necessary. These meetings also provided valuable material for submission to the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) by ICAO (ITU-R Study Groups 4 and 8 and the Conference Preparatory Meeting (CPM) refer). 6.1.5 The organization of the meetings in the various ICAO regions was highly effective since it significantly improved the coordination with the various States in the region that participated in the meetings.
    [Show full text]
  • Pma8000b-Mp3 Pin Assignments
    9800 Martel Road Lenoir City, TN 37772 www.ps-engineering.com PPMMAA88000000BB--MMPP33 FOR USE WITH Avidyne Entegra Integrated Avionics System R9 Document P/N 200-890-0403 Rev. 4, Jan. 2011 Audio Selector Panel with Marker Beacon Receiver High-fidelity Stereo Intercom with Internal MP3 Player System Installation and Operation Manual FAA- TSO C50c, C35d EASA ETSO C50c, 2C35d Patented under one or more of the following; No. 4,941,187; 5,903,227; 6,160,496 and 6,493, 450 In certified aircraft, warranty is not valid unless this product is installed by an Authorized PS Engineering dealer. PS Engineering, Inc. 2011 © Copyright Notice Any reproduction or retransmittal of this publication, or any portion thereof, without the expressed written permission of PS Engi- neering, Inc. is strictly prohibited. For further information contact the Publications Manager at PS Engineering, Inc., 9800 Martel Road, Lenoir City, TN 37772. Phone (865) 988-9800, email [email protected]. Table of Contents Section I – GENERAL INFORMATION........................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 SCOPE....................................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.3 EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Radar Beacon Transponder (RBX) Functional Description
    FAA-RD-80-135 Project Report ATC-104 Radar Beacon Transponder (RBX) Functional Description R.G. Sandholm 18 February 1981 Lincoln Laboratory MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY LEXINGTON, MASSACHUSETTS Prepared for the Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, D.C. 20591 This document is available to the public through the National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161 This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. CONTENTS 1.0 OVERVIEW AND SHRY 1.1 Introduction 1 RBX Concept 1 ) 1.2 1.3 Interaction of RBX with BCAS and ATC 2 2.0 THE RBX OATA LINR 6 ./ 2.1 Signal Waveforms 6 2.2 Signal Content 6 2.3 Message Formts 7 3.0 RBX GROUND EQUIPMENT 10 3.1 Transmission Control 10 3.2 System Clock 10 3.3 Modulator/Transmitter 12 3.4 htenna System 12 3.5 Receiver 12 3.6 Interrogation Signal Processing 14 3.7 RBX Processor 14 3.7.1 Sensitivity Level Selection 14 3.7.2 ATC Communication Data Link Interface 16 3.7.3 ATC Remote Control Interface 17 3.8 Performance Monitoring 17 4.0 RBX PERFOMCE 18 4.1 Link Reliability 18 4.1.1 Link Power Budget 18 4.1.2 RBX Antenna Lobing 18 4.1.3 Aircraft Antenna Fading 18 4.1.4 Interference Effects 22 4.1.5 Net Link Reliability 25 .> REFERENCES 26 . iii —. ILLUSTRATIONS 1 Relationship of RBX to Elements of BCAS and ARTS 2 Sequence of Events and Information Transfer between RBX and BCAS 3 RBX Link Formats a 4 RBX Functional Block Diagram 11 5 Example of an RBX Front End 13 6 Side View of RBX Coverage Volume 15 7 Vertical Lobing..” .,:- 20 a Aircraft Antenna Summry Statistics 21 9 Probability of RBX 3-pulse Detection of a 24 Single BCAS Interrogation in the Presence of Noise Alone and Noise Plus Interference.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Communications Commission § 80.108
    Federal Communications Commission § 80.108 once every 15 minutes during radio- § 80.104 Identification of radar trans- telephone communications. missions not authorized. (f) VHF public coast stations licensed This section applies to all maritime to serve a predetermined geographic radar transmitters except radar beacon service area are not required to provide stations. station identification under this sec- (a) Radar transmitters must not tion. A site-based VHF public coast transmit station identification. station may identify by means of the (b) [Reserved] approximate geographic location of the OPERATING PROCEDURES—LAND station or the area it serves when it is STATIONS the only VHF public coast station serv- ing the location or there will be no § 80.105 General obligations of coast conflict with the identification of any stations. other station. Each coast station or marine-utility [51 FR 31213, Sept. 2, 1986, as amended at 52 station must acknowledge and receive FR 35244, Sept. 18, 1987; 68 FR 46961, Aug. 7, all calls directed to it by ship or air- 2003; 69 FR 64671, Nov. 8, 2004] craft stations. Such stations are per- mitted to transmit safety communica- § 80.103 Digital selective calling (DSC) tion to any ship or aircraft station. operating procedures. VHF (156–162 MHz) and AMTS (216–220 (a) Operating procedures for the use MHz) public coast stations may provide fixed or hybrid services on a co-pri- of DSC equipment in the maritime mo- mary basis with mobile operations. bile service are as contained in ITU–R M.541–9 (incorporated by reference, see [65 FR 77824, Dec.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact on Modern FM Broadcast Signals on Aeronautical
    Impact of FM Broadcast Signals on Aeronautical Radionavigation Rodrigo Berquó de Aguiar Viveiros Santos Thesis to obtain the Master of Science Degree in Electrical and Computer Engineering Supervisor: Prof. Luís Manuel de Jesus Sousa Correia Examination Committee Chairperson: Prof. José Eduardo Charters Ribeiro da Cunha Sanguino Supervisor: Prof. Luís Manuel de Jesus Sousa Correia Member of Committee: Prof. António Manuel Restani Graça Alves Moreira Eng. Carlos Silva February 2015 ii To everyone in my life iii iv Acknowledgements Acknowledgements First and foremost, I want to give my profound thanks to Prof. Luis M. Correia, who was responsible not only for supervising this Thesis but also for helping my professional development throughout this last year. He helped me gain various skills by presenting discipline, professionalism, and providing technical support through our weekly meetings. I want to thank him as well for giving me the opportunity for doing this Thesis under his supervision, and additionally in collaboration with NAV Portugal, which presented two valuable experiences for my personal development. I want to express my gratitude to NAV Portugal and their engineers, namely Eng. Carlos Alves, Eng. Carlos Silva and Eng. Luís Pissarro, for presenting exceptional availability and for being supportive through the development of this work. I also want to thank them for providing essential technical guidelines and information that were critical in the realisation of the study. I am thankful to Eng. Fernanda Girão from ANACOM for providing detailed information regarding the FM audio broadcasting stations located in Portugal, which made possible the development of the regional scenarios that were in the core of this Thesis.
    [Show full text]