DOCSLIB.ORG

Opening Pandora's Apartheid

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Opening Pandora’s Apartheid Box By Mike Smith Mike Smith Political Commentary: Where the Truth Hurts (http://mspoliticalcommentary.blogspot.com/) Table of Contents 01. Time To Open Pandora’s Apartheid Box 001-003 02. What “diversity” means in South Africa. 004-006 03. The violent nature of Blacks. First rationale for Apartheid. 007-010 04. Black culture and customs. Second Rationale for Apartheid. 011-013 05. Black cognitive ability. Third Rationale for Apartheid. 014-017 06. Other rationales for Apartheid. 018-020 07. The role of a government 021-024 08. The lies about the Homelands 025-026 09. The lies about the Townships 027-030 10. District Six: A case study in forced removals. 031-034 11. Bantu Education under Apartheid 035-040 12. The Architects of Apartheid 041-042 13. The Apartheid laws on mixed marriages 043-049 14. Scapegoating Apartheid to steal our country and our wealth 050-053 15. Smuts and Rhodes’ “World State” 054-057 16. The Hidden Government 058-064 17. The Banking Conspiracy 065-069 18. Hypocrisy at The United Nations 070-077 19. The Role of the Commonwealth 078-081 20. Dr. Verwoerd, Nationalist Visionary: “The most hated man in South Africa” 082-086 and the Success of Nationalism 21. The Assassination of Dr. Verwoerd 087-092 22. Hole Terror: How the Church Crucified South Africa 093-101 23. Behind the Paper Curtain… And Beyond. 102-108 24. P.W. Botha: Start of the Final Betrayal 109-114 1. Time to open Pandora’s Apartheid Box By Mike Smith Mike Smith Political Commentary1 22nd of April 2010 When we were children. We could never understand what the church minister meant when he said that all sins are sins and all sins are equally bad. It did not make sense to us, because telling a lie is not as bad as murdering someone...or is it? Personally I believe that lying is far more dangerous than murder. Lying can kill entire civilisations. You see...Lying is an art. There are many facets to it, but basically successful lying works like this: You start with a massive lie. Some idiots will believe it, some will be mildly sceptic and a few intelligent ones will dismiss it as hogwash. Then you tone the lie down a bit, and those mildly sceptic ones becomes believers and the few intelligent ones who thought they knew the truth start doubting themselves and think, “OK, some of it might be true, but it is mostly bullshit”. And so it carries on...you tone the lie down a little bit more until everyone accepts it as the truth. See, people do not believe lies, because they have to, but , because they want to...But there are lies and then there are statistics...and then there is the truth. And that is what I profess to. And so the lie of Apartheid and everything about it was started as a massive lie until Apartheid was accepted as a crime against humanity on the 30th of November 1973. The Crime of Apartheid2 Was it a Crime? A Crime against humanity?...or was it the fairest system ever created for multicultural societies? These are the questions I want to explore in a series of articles. “Why”, you ask? This so called “Crime of Apartheid” is a daemon released from Pandora’s Box. It has far reaching consequences that were previously not considered. It has consequences and it is making people nervous...everyone from international corporations, international church organisations to sovereign nations are currently biting their nails... 1 http://mspoliticalcommentary.blogspot.com/2010/04/time-to-open-pandoras-apartheid-box.html 2 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crime_of_apartheid Opening Pandora’s Apartheid Box, Mike Smith: www.mspoliticalcommentary.blogspot.com 1 What is the motivation to open Pandora’s Box? Does common sense not tell you to rather keep it shut? Do you really want to see how deep the rabbit hole goes? When it comes to “The Crime of Apartheid”, the only motivation is GREED. So who are these greedy people brave enough to open Pandora’s Apartheid Box? They are called The Khulumani support group3 Khulumani means “To speak out” in the Zulu Language. So let us speak out. Let us not hold back anymore. Let us not pay 20,000 blacks R30,000 “restitution for suffering under Apartheid” like the ANC did after the TRC (Truth and Reconciliation Commission”). To understand it better I have to take you back a while to when us whites willingly handed power over to the Blacks in 1994... We thought we had an honest deal. The deal was actually simple. We wanted the international community to lift all economic and sport sanctions against us so we could play Rugby and take part in the Olympics. In exchange we asked the ANC to stop planting bombs in shopping centres and landmines on farm roads, we told the international community that we were willing to bury the hatchet with the ANC, provided they do the same. We wanted to bury Apartheid and build a fantastic country all working together to make the country even stronger than what it was. We thought it was achievable, because we always got on well with our Black domestics in our homes or our black colleagues at work. We knew nothing about the communist agitations happening in the townships. Most of us, were political dunces at the time. Our political beliefs were very liberal after we left (brainwashing) school and entered the realm of Liberal activist student politics. The reality was that when we buried the hatchet, the ANC continued the struggle. They have not at the time, neither now achieved their ultimate goal, which is a total communist South Africa...and therefore will continue the struggle until there is not a single white person left in South Africa. How did I realise that the ANC was continuing the struggle? I saw it with the TRC, I saw it with the introduction of Affirmative Action and Black Economic Empowerment. I saw that the ANC was not willing to let it all go. They were not interested in burying the hatchet. The ANC was not interested in “A better life for all”. The ANC was only interested in making as much money for themselves and screw the rest of all South Africans, Black or White. The ANC equals Greed. Nothing will ever be enough. You cannot bargain or deal with them, because they will take everything you put on the table and demand more. It is futile to deal with these Marxist terrorists. Dealing with them will mean you will lose everything you have and they will not give up a single thing they have. You will keep on giving until you have nothing more to give, at which point you become expendable. That is when they will kill you. We as ordinary whites in South Africa are fast approaching that stage. 3 http://www.khulumani.net/ Opening Pandora’s Apartheid Box, Mike Smith: www.mspoliticalcommentary.blogspot.com 2 Along came the TRC who paid blacks in South Africa R30.000 each for their bullshit stories about how Apartheid oppressed them. The oppression and benefits will be dealt with in another article, but as far as I am concerned, when someone offers me R30,000 then I can also suck a brilliant story of oppression out of my thumb. Make the sum people. R30,000 paid out to about 20 thousand black??? R600,million...is that enough? So to take stock. We thought it was enough to hand over our country that we built with our money and our expertise. We thought it was enough to give them a first world country with a nuclear and space program. We identified every single black who supposedly suffered under Apartheid, we believed all their lies all 20,000 who came forward, we paid them restitution of R30,000 each... But let me tell you, it was not enough, It will never be enough with these Marxist terrorist scum. No, they want blood. They want us to pay in blood...to the very last drop...more on that later. They have started a court case in the USA against international companies who benefited from Apartheid. They name Land Rover (Leyland) and Mercedes who supplied vehicles to patrol the townships, they mention Oil companies such as Royal Dutch Shell who ironically donated their headquarters in SA to the ANC that is now called Luthuli House. They name Barclays Bank who withdrew from SA and at the same time changed their name to First National Bank and continued to fund the ANC. These same ANC scum now turns against their international masters and demands restitution... But what about countries that supported the previous National Party? We immediately think of Taiwan and Israel? Surely if you can claim restitution from international corporations who supported Apartheid then you can also claim restitution from countries who supported the Apartheid government at the time. See, what I mean about opening Pandora’s Apartheid Box? The ANC should have left sleeping dogs lying, but no, greed has no brakes... So let us see where this journey takes us. Let us see how deep the rabbit hole goes. At the end of this series you will see that we never had any friends, nobody had any friends. Nobody is friends currently and nobody will ever be friends with anybody. Everybody lies about everyone else. The biggest lie is the one that everyone believes about Apartheid. These scavenges are all in it for the money and the power.
Recommended publications
  • Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa Report: Volume 2

    Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa Report: Volume 2

    VOLUME TWO Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa Report The report of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission was presented to President Nelson Mandela on 29 October 1998. Archbishop Desmond Tutu Ms Hlengiwe Mkhize Chairperson Dr Alex Boraine Mr Dumisa Ntsebeza Vice-Chairperson Ms Mary Burton Dr Wendy Orr Revd Bongani Finca Adv Denzil Potgieter Ms Sisi Khampepe Dr Fazel Randera Mr Richard Lyster Ms Yasmin Sooka Mr Wynand Malan* Ms Glenda Wildschut Dr Khoza Mgojo * Subject to minority position. See volume 5. Chief Executive Officer: Dr Biki Minyuku I CONTENTS Chapter 1 Chapter 6 National Overview .......................................... 1 Special Investigation The Death of President Samora Machel ................................................ 488 Chapter 2 The State outside Special Investigation South Africa (1960-1990).......................... 42 Helderberg Crash ........................................... 497 Special Investigation Chemical and Biological Warfare........ 504 Chapter 3 The State inside South Africa (1960-1990).......................... 165 Special Investigation Appendix: State Security Forces: Directory Secret State Funding................................... 518 of Organisations and Structures........................ 313 Special Investigation Exhumations....................................................... 537 Chapter 4 The Liberation Movements from 1960 to 1990 ..................................................... 325 Special Investigation Appendix: Organisational structures and The Mandela United
  • REPORTABLE in the HIGH COURT of SOUTH AFRICA (CAPE of GOOD HOPE PROVINCIAL DIVISION) in the Matter Between: CASE NO. 5933/08 An

    REPORTABLE in the HIGH COURT of SOUTH AFRICA (CAPE of GOOD HOPE PROVINCIAL DIVISION) in the Matter Between: CASE NO. 5933/08 An

    REPORTABLE IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (CAPE OF GOOD HOPE PROVINCIAL DIVISION) In the matter between: CASE NO. 5933/08 THE CITY OF CAPE TOWN APPLICANT and THE PREMIER OF THE WESTERN CAPE FIRST RESPONDENT THE MINISTER FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND HOUSING IN THE PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT OF THE WESTERN CAPE SECOND RESPONDENT THE HON. MR. JUSTICE N.C. ERASMUS N.O. THIRD RESPONDENT GEORGE PAPADAKIS N.O. FOURTH RESPONDENT HERDIE VERMEULEN N.O. FIFTH RESPONDENT DEMOCRATIC ALLIANCE INTERVENING PARTY ________________________________________________________________ JUDGMENT Delivered on 1st SEPTEMBER 2008 ________________________________________________________________ SWAIN, J. [1] The present dispute arose in the context of the political battle between the Democratic Alliance (DA) and the African National Congress (ANC) for control of the City of Cape Town, the council of 2 which is currently led by a coalition of the DA, together with other political parties, which was previously controlled by the ANC. [2] The applicant is the City of Cape Town (the City) the executive Mayor of which is M/s Helen Zille, a member of the DA and its national leader. 2.1 The first respondent is the Premier of the Western Cape, Mr. Ebrahim Rasool (the Premier) and the second respondent is the Minister for Local Government and Housing in the Provincial Government of the Western Cape Mr. Qubudile Dyanatyi (the MEC). The Western Cape Provincial Government is controlled by the ANC which currently has a majority in the Western Cape Provincial Legislature. The Premier and the MEC are members of the ANC. 2.2 The third respondent is the Honourable Mr.
  • Khayelitsha, South Africa Meetali Jain*

    Khayelitsha, South Africa Meetali Jain*

    THE ROSE THAT GREW FROM CONCRETE: THE COMMISSION OF INQUIRY INTO POLICING IN 9 KHAYELITSHA, SOUTH AFRICA Meetali Jain* 1 Introduction The Commission of Inquiry into Allegations of Police Inefficiency and a Breakdown in Relations Between the South African Police Services and the Community of Khayelitsha (Khayelitsha Commission or Commission), established in 2012 and concluded in 2014, examined patterns of a systemic breakdown in policing in one of South Africa’s poorest townships. Unusual in that it was constituted as a result of persistent and pro-active calls from civil society rather than a response to a specific event, the Khayelitsha Commission created an enormous archival footprint that shed much-needed light on ‘policing the post- colony’.1 Further distinguished by the almost exclusive forward-looking orientation of its inquiry, the Khayelitsha Commission managed to facilitate discussions with all affected parties including, perhaps most notably, with the South African Police Services (SAPS), an institution known for its opaque internal administrative culture. However, even with what may be described as near optimal circumstances with regard to the structure, composition and operations of the Commission itself, the impact of the Commission remains elusive, largely because of the party- political squabbling that haunted its establishment and continues to haunt its implementation.2 It nevertheless remains a powerful case study of the contribution commissions of inquiry can make, when properly constituted * This chapter is based upon interviews and documentary research conducted in Cape Town in March and April 2016. The research team also included Anyango Yvonne Oyieke. 1 E. van der Spuy ‘Inquiries into Commissions of Inquiry into Policing’ South African Crime Quarterly 53 (2015) p.3.
  • Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa Report

    Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa Report

    VOLUME TWO Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa Report PURL: https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/ee4d9e/ The report of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission was presented to President Nelson Mandela on 29 October 1998. Archbishop Desmond Tutu Ms Hlengiwe Mkhize Chairperson Dr Alex Boraine Mr Dumisa Ntsebeza Vice-Chairperson Ms Mary Burton Dr Wendy Orr Revd Bongani Finca Adv Denzil Potgieter Ms Sisi Khampepe Dr Fazel Randera Mr Richard Lyster Ms Yasmin Sooka Mr Wynand Malan* Ms Glenda Wildschut Dr Khoza Mgojo * Subject to minority position. See volume 5. Chief Executive Officer: Dr Biki Minyuku PURL: https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/ee4d9e/ I CONTENTS Chapter 1 Chapter 6 National Overview .......................................... 1 Special Investigation The Death of President Samora Machel ................................................ 488 Chapter 2 The State outside Special Investigation South Africa (1960-1990).......................... 42 Helderberg Crash ........................................... 497 Special Investigation Chemical and Biological Warfare........ 504 Chapter 3 The State inside South Africa (1960-1990).......................... 165 Special Investigation Appendix: State Security Forces: Directory Secret State Funding................................... 518 of Organisations and Structures........................ 313 Special Investigation Exhumations....................................................... 537 Chapter 4 The Liberation Movements from 1960 to 1990 ....................................................

  • CASE NO. in the Matter Between: the CITY of CAPE TOWN

    IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA ( CAPE OF GOOD HOPE PROVINCIAL DIVISION) CASE NO. In the matter between: THE CITY OF CAPE TOWN Applicant and THE PREMIER OF THE WESTERN CAPE First Respondent THE MINISTER FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT Second Respondent AND HOUSING IN THE PROVINICAL GOVERNMENT OF THE WESTERN CAPE THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE NATHAN ERASMUS N.O. Third Respondent GEORGE PAPADAKIS N.O. Fourth Respondent HERDIE VERMEULEN N.O. Fifth Respondent AFFIDAVIT I, the undersigned JACOB DIEDERIK SMIT, do hereby make oath and say: [A] INTRODUCTION AND PARTIES 1. I am the chairperson and speaker of the applicant’s council as contemplated in s 36(1) of the Local Government: Municipal Structures Act 117 of 1998 (“the Structures Act”). I am duly authorised by the applicant to make this affidavit. The facts are within my personal knowledge save where the context indicates otherwise, and are true. Submissions are based on legal advice. 2. The applicant is the City of Cape Town , a municipality with legal personality duly established as a category A municipality in accordance with the Structures Act. Its principal offices are at the Civic Centre, 12 Hertzog Boulevard , Cape Town . I shall refer to the applicant as the City. 3. The first respondent is the Premier of the Western Cape , Ebrahim Rasool, with his office at 27 Wale Street , Cape Town . I shall refer to him as the Premier. He has the power in terms of s127(2)(e) of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 (“the Constitution”) read with s37(2)(e) of the Constitution of the Western Cape, 1997 Act 1 of 1998 (“the WC Constitution”) and s1(1) of the Western Cape Provincial Commissions Act 10 of 1998 (“the WC Commissions Act”) to establish commissions of inquiry.
  • February 1981 1

    February 1981 1

    16 HF BM) HEALTH CARE for profit FEBRUARY 1981 1 - THE ARTICLE thmt follows mm h supplement to thin The contribution ia an exploratory one, as far as this is cencsrned. tfortt In Progrcia represents a departure from and does not aim to be definitive or complete- Contributors submitting matarlml far previous editorial policy. u tad been It certainly falls into the category of work inclusion In future supplements should decided not to include contributions in WIP in progreaa. One of the reasona for presenting Include a non-technical, aaaily accessible which, beceuas of terminology used, vers not it in sTIP la to elicit comment and response, summary of their mrticle for inclusion In the fairly easily accessible to those without m and the author, David Kaplan, has specifically mmin body of HP, specific training in the area being discussed. requeated critical comment on the article. The contribution which follows BeJtes use of Thia will assist in the development and certain complex concepts, and the terminology furthering of a debate which touchee on the used and Ideas explored are difficult reading atructure of the South African economy, the for the non-expert* likely form of future capitalist development, The editors nonetheless felt that the and the implications of both structure and article was an laportant one. making a development. contribution of contemporary value, and having Comment can be Bent to the editors, or definite ett^ategic implications. The editors directly to were unwilling to deprive WI^ readerahlp of David Kaplan, the ideaa and information contained in the Department of Economic Hlatory, University of Cape Town, article because of their complexity, snd it 7700 Rondeboech, was accordingly decided to Include it as a CAPE TOW.
  • Business, State and Society in the Western Cape from 1960 to 1990

    Business, State and Society in the Western Cape from 1960 to 1990

    BUSINESS, STATE AND SOCIETY IN THE WESTERN CAPE FROM 1960 TO 1990 Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR PHILOSOPHIAE Faculty of Business and Economic Sciences Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University By ROBERT JAMESON WOOD Student Number: 210252758 January 2014 SUPERVISORS: PROFESSOR R.J. HAINES PROFESSOR HENDRIK LLOYD ABSTRACT This research examines the relationship between business, the state and society in South Africa -- particularly the Western Cape -- over the period from 1960 to 1990, viewed against the background of economic conditions in this region, South Africa and the world. Utilising a development history approach, it is based on an extensive study of primary and secondary documentation, supplemented by a panel of in-depth interviews and observation. This study finds that the relationship between business and apartheid incorporated both functional and dysfunctional elements, although over time the benefits diminished and the costs multiplied. The latter, Regulation Theory suggests, is true for any institutional order, but it could be argued that, under apartheid, the particularly fragile and contradictory nature of the institutional arrangement made inevitable crises more rapid and more pronounced. On the one hand, apartheid restricted the economic development of the country, as a result of a range of factors from skills shortages to the visible waste of resources on grand ideological projects and security; as suggested by Resource Curse Theory, minerals windfalls tend to encourage irresponsible behaviour by governments. On the other hand, certain businesses prospered, notably the Afrikaner business sector. All business benefited from the overall growth of the 1950s and 1960s, whilst niche players often did quite well even during the 1980s.
  • A Historical Perspective of the Information Scandal

    A Historical Perspective of the Information Scandal

    A HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE OF THE INFORMATION SCANDAL DISSERTATION by JOSHUA KRUGER HAASBROEK Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree MAGISTER ARTIUM in the Faculty of the Humanities (Department of History) at the University of the Free State Bloemfontein Supervisor: Dr J-A. Stemmet Co-Supervisor: Dr M.M. Oelofse Bloemfontein: November 2016 I declare that the dissertation hereby submitted by me for the fulfilment of the Magister Artium degree in the Department of History at the University of the Free State, is my own independent work and has not previously been submitted by me at another university/faculty. I furthermore cede copyright of the dissertation in favour of the University of the Free State. ……………….. J.K. Haasbroek TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE .................................................................................................................. i-vi 1. PROPAGANDA DEFINED 1.1 PERCEPTIONS ON PROPAGANDA ....................................................................1 1.2 THE THEORY OF PROPAGANDA ......................................................................4 1.3 PROPAGANDA IN THE 20TH CENTURY ..........................................................15 2. SOUTH AFRICA: INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL AFFAIRS, 1950-1970 2.1 SOUTH AFRICAN POLITICS .............................................................................22 2.2 THE STRUGGLE FOR FREEDOM .....................................................................28 2.3 SOUTH AFRICA AND THE COLD WAR ..........................................................32
  • Speech by Helen Zille Premier of the Western Cape

    Speech by Helen Zille Premier of the Western Cape

    SPEECH BY HELEN ZILLE PREMIER OF THE WESTERN CAPE STATE OF THE PROVINCE 2009 WESTERN CAPE PROVINCIAL PARLIAMENT FRIDAY 29 MAY 2009 - 11H00 Honourable Speaker Cabinet colleagues Leader of the Opposition Members of the Diplomatic Corps Leaders of political parties Honourable Members Leaders of local government Director-General and Heads of Department Religious leaders Community leaders Colleagues and friends Citizens of the Western Cape Welcome to the opening of the fourth democratically elected Western Cape Provincial Parliament. I am mindful of the context in which I stand here today. We have a public mandate following a change of government in an election. The very fact that a government has changed hands peacefully through the ballot box is excellent news for South Africa. It means we are in the process of consolidating democracy, which requires not only the holding of regular elections, but also the ability of citizens to change their government through their vote. Too many emerging democracies have faltered at this crucial pass. Our recent election is a cause of optimism that we will not join the ranks of failed transitions. On this side of the House, Speaker, we recognise that our province remains deeply divided, and we are profoundly aware of our responsibilities in this context. All of us, on both sides of this House, should be. This government remains committed to our election promise of one nation, with one future, but this should never imply a one-party state. I will do my very best to be a Premier for all the people. By the same token, Jacob Zuma is the President of all South Africans.
  • Annual Report

    Annual Report

    To obtain additional copies of this document, please contact: Department of the Premier Office of the Director-General P.O. Box 659 CAPE TOWN 8000 Tel.: 021-483-8219 Fax: 021-483-3300 E-mail: [email protected] Om nog afskrifte van hierdie dokument te bekom, tree asseblief in verbinding met: Departement van die Premier Kantoor van die Direkteur-Generaal Posbus 659 KAAPSTAD 8000 Tel.: 021-483-8219 Faks: 021-483-3300 E-pos: [email protected] Ukuba ufuna iikopi ezongezelelweyo zolu xweb hu, qhagamshelana: Isebe leNkulumbuso i-Ofisi yoMlawuli-Jikelele P.O. Box 659 EKapa 8000 Umnxeba: 021-483-8219 Ifaksi: 021-483-3300 E-meyile: [email protected] DEPARTMENT OF THE PREMIER Annual Report for the year ended 31 March 2010 Tabled in Western Cape Provincial Legislature Cape Town, South Africa 30 September 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE PART ONE General information 1 PART TWO Programme performance 5 2.1 Voted funds 5 2.2 Aim of vote 5 2.3 Strategic goals, objectives, programmes and achievements 5 Strategic goals and objectives 5 Programmes 7 Achievements 7 2.4 Overview of the service-delivery environment for 2009/10 9 2.5 Overview of the organisational environment for 2009/10 10 2.6 Overview of key policy developments for 2009/10 10 2.7 Departmental revenue and expenditure 11 2.8 Programme performance 13 2.8.1 Programme 1: Administration 13 2.8.2 Programme 2: Institutional Development 16 2.8.3 Programme 3: Policy and Governance 25 2.8.4 Programme 4: Information and Communication Technology (ICT) 36 PART THREE Report of the Audit Committee 46
  • Apartheid Grand Corruption Assessing the Scale of Crimes of Profit in South Africa from 1976 to 1994

    Apartheid Grand Corruption Assessing the Scale of Crimes of Profit in South Africa from 1976 to 1994

    Apartheid Grand Corruption Assessing the scale of crimes of profit in South Africa from 1976 to 1994 A report prepared by civil society at the request of the Second National Anti-Corruption Summit May, 2006 Report Author: Hennie van Vuuren Institute for Security Studies, Cape Town Foreword Apartheid grand corruption Assessing the scale of crimes of profit from 1976 to 1994 A report prepared by civil society in terms of a resolution of the Second National Anti-Corruption Summit for presentation at the National Anti-Corruption Forum, May 2006 Hennie van Vuuren Programme Head: Corruption and Governance Institute for Security Studies, Cape Town 2006 i Apartheid grand corruption The vision of the Institute for Security Studies is one of a stable and peaceful Africa characterised by human rights, the rule of law, democracy and collaborative security. As an applied policy research institute with a mission to conceptualise, inform and enhance the security debate in Africa, the Institute supports this vision statement by undertaking independent applied research and analysis; facilitating and supporting policy formulation; raising the awareness of decision makers and the public; monitoring trends and policy implementation; collecting, interpreting and disseminating information; networking on national, regional and international levels; and capacity-building. © 2006, Institute for Security Studies Copyright in the volume as a whole is vested in the Institute for Security Studies, and no part may be reproduced in whole or in part without the express permission, in writing, of both the author and the publishers. The opinions expressed in this monograph do not necessarily reflect those of the Institute, its Trustees, members of the Advisory Board, or donors.
  • Cape Town SECOND CARNEGIE INQUIRY INTO POVERTY and DEVELOPMENT in SOUTHERN AFRICA Sone Diseases Associated Etlited by Peter Disl

    Cape Town SECOND CARNEGIE INQUIRY INTO POVERTY and DEVELOPMENT in SOUTHERN AFRICA Sone Diseases Associated Etlited by Peter Disl

    SECOND CARNEGIE INQUIRY INTO POVERTY AND DEVELOPMENT IN SOUTHERN AFRICA sone diseases associated with poverty Etlited by Peter Disler Chippy Olver Carnegie Conference Paper No.295 Cape Town 13 - 19 April 1984 ISBN 0 7992 0754 3 i PREFACE It is now nearly 50 years since the then Medical Officer of Health of Cape Town wrote in the SClUth African Medical Journa11• "Poverty is not only a cause of ill health and mortality; it is also a result of them ...... my object is not to discuss the prevention or palliative remedies for poverty, but only to emphasize once more its fundamental relationship to public health." In many ways these perceptive thoughts crystallize the motivation behind this manual. It is not our intention to discuss approaches to the management of poverty, nor to provide a comprehensive text for the medically qualified; neither is this a guide line for people afflicted by both poverty and illness (many of whom would anyway be illiterate by virtue of their economic status). The target group for this mnaual is the many non-medically qualified persons who work daily with poor people, who encounter illness and who do not have a basic knowledge of the diseases, their frequency and their management. It is hoped that this text will provide some insights which will enable them to deal with the general problems more thoroughly. As many of the diseases covered are based in similar environmental cir­ cumstances, to avoid repitition a general introduction has been provided by Cedric De Beer. This deals with many of the socio-economic factors associated with poverty that influence health in general and in the South African context, in particular.