DOCSLIB.ORG

Ricinocarpos Brevis (Euphorbiaceae)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ricinocarpos Brevis (Euphorbiaceae) Koolyanobbing Iron Ore Project MS982 ANNUAL COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT 2019 Proponent: Yilgarn Iron Pty Ltd Address: 1 Sleat Road, Applecross, WA 6153 Postal Address: Locked Bag 3, Canning Bridge LPO, Applecross, WA 6153 Contact: Tim Berryman Phone: +61 8 9329 3713 Email: [email protected] April 2020 MS982 Annual Compliance Assessment Report 2019 Revision History Revision Issue Date Prepared By Distribution Status Number 0 30/04/2020 A. Vague DWER Final Issue Date: 30/04/2020 ENV-TS-RP-0227 Page 2 of 39 MS982 Annual Compliance Assessment Report 2019 CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Project Overview ............................................................................................................................. 4 1.2 The Proponent ................................................................................................................................. 4 1.3 Approvals History ............................................................................................................................ 4 1.4 Ministerial Statement 982 ............................................................................................................... 4 2. PROJECT STATUS ........................................................................................................................................ 6 3. COMPLIANCE ............................................................................................................................................. 6 3.1 Non-compliance and Corrective Actions ......................................................................................... 6 3.1.1 Clearing Non-compliance.................................................................................................... 6 3.1.2 Malleefowl Reporting Trigger Criteria ................................................................................ 7 3.1.3 W1/W2 Flora Monitoring Reporting Trigger Criteria ......................................................... 7 3.2 Statement of Compliance ................................................................................................................ 8 4. DETAILS OF DECLARED COMPLIANCE STATUS ........................................................................................... 8 FIGURES FIGURE 1 - GENERAL LOCATION OF YIPL YILGARN OPERATIONS ...................................................................... 5 FIGURE 2: DISTURBANCE DISCREPANCY ............................................................................................................ 7 FIGURE 3: WINDARLING RESTRICTED ACCESS SIGNAGE ................................................................................. 35 ATTACHMENTS ATTACHMENT 1: 2019 STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE FOR MS982 .................................................................. 9 ATTACHMENT 2: 2019 ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE, MINISTERIAL STATEMENT MS982 AUDIT TABLE ..... 10 ATTACHMENT 3: 2019 LAND CLEARING FOOTPRINT AT WINDARLING OPERATIONS .................................... 25 ATTACHMENT 4: 2019 LAND CLEARING FOOTPRINT AT MT JACKSON J1 OPERATIONS ................................. 26 ATTACHMENT 5: 2019 LAND CLEARING FOOTPRINT MT JACKSON OPERATIONS J2/J3 OPERATIONS ........... 27 ATTACHMENT 6: 2019 LAND CLEARING FOOTPRINT AT DECEPTION DEPOSIT ............................................... 28 ATTACHMENT 7: ANNUAL TETRATHECA PAYNTERAE MONITORING REPORT 2019 ....................................... 29 ATTACHMENT 8: ANNUAL RICINOCARPOS BREVIS MONITORING REPORT 2019 ........................................... 30 ATTACHMENT 9: WINDARLING W1 AND W2 FLORA MONITORING REPORT ................................................. 31 ATTACHMENT 10: MT JACKSON J1 BIODIVERSITY MONITORING ................................................................... 32 ATTACHMENT 11: HAUL ROAD VEGETATION MONITORING REPORT 2019.................................................... 33 ATTACHMENT 12: RESTRICTED AREAS WINDARLING ..................................................................................... 34 ATTACHMENT 13: CALYTRIX VISCIDA (P1) DECEPTION DISTURBANCE AREA ................................................. 36 ATTACHMENT 14: ANNUAL MALLEEFOWL NEST MOUND MONITORING REPORT 2019 ................................ 37 ATTACHMENT 15: RESTORATION RESEARCH FINAL REPORT: RICINOCARPOS BREVIS 2013-2018 ................. 38 Issue Date: 30/04/2020 ENV-TS-RP-0227 Page 3 of 39 MS982 Annual Compliance Assessment Report 2019 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Project Overview Mining has occurred at Koolyanobbing since the 1960’s. Formally known as Portman Iron Ore, Cliffs Asia Pacific Iron Ore Pty Ltd (Cliffs) recommissioned the operations following closure by BHP Pty Ltd in the early 1980’s and operated the mine from 1994 until 2018. Cliffs ceased mining operations at Koolyanobbing in early 2018 and entered into an Asset Sale Agreement with Mineral Resources Limited (MRL) on 12 June 2018. The transaction was completed in August 2018 and included the transfer of legal title in Cliffs mining tenements to MRL and ownership of all remaining iron ore, fixed plant, equipment and non-process infrastructure in the Yilgarn and at the Port of Esperance. All assets were transferred to the wholly owned MRL subsidiary Yilgarn Iron Pty Ltd (YIPL). YIPL commenced mining at Koolyanobbing in September 2018. Iron ore is mined from a number of open pits, blended, crushed and screened to make products that meet export market specifications. Ore from the northern operations of Deception, Mt Jackson and Windarling is transported via a private haul road to Koolyanobbing where it is selectively blended with ore from Koolyanobbing, crushed, and screened to meet market specifications. The final product is transported from Koolyanobbing to Esperance Port by rail. 1.2 The Proponent Following the Asset Sale Agreement and pursuant to section 38(6) and (7) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986 (WA) (EP Act), YIPL was nominated as the person responsible for the Proposal (Yilgarn Operations – Windarling Range, Mt Jackson Range and Deception Deposit; Assessment No. 2011; Statement No. 982). YIPL is a wholly owned subsidiary of MRL and became the beneficial holder of the mining tenements for the Koolyanobbing Iron Ore Project. 1.3 Approvals History From 2003 to 2012, the Yilgarn Operations were regulated by seven Statement approvals issued by the Western Australian Minister for Environment under s45 (5) under the EP Act. In September 2012, Cliffs was approached by the Office of the Environmental Protection Authority (OEPA) to investigate the potential of consolidating the above seven Statements into a single document. This approach by OEPA was prompted by an enquiry from the Minister for Environment as a result of a number of Statement approvals for connected mine operations being issued in late 2012. Cliffs was granted environmental approval for the consolidation of previous statements under both s45C and s46 of the EP Act on 24 September 2014 through Ministerial Statement 982 (MS982). Responsibility for this Proposal was transferred to YIPL in the third quarter of 2018, following the Asset Sale Agreement between Cliffs and MRL. 1.4 Ministerial Statement 982 MS982 outlines conditions regulating the mining of iron ore at YIPL’s northern Yilgarn Operations, which includes Windarling Range (W1, W2, W3/5, W4 West & W4 East, W7 and W10 Pits), Mt Jackson Range (J1, J2 and J3) and Deception Deposit. These operations are located approximately 70, 100 and 120 km north of Koolyanobbing respectively (see Figure 1 for general locations). Issue Date: 30/04/2020 ENV-TS-RP-0227 Page 4 of 39 MS982 Annual Compliance Assessment Report 2019 Figure 1 - General Location of YIPL Yilgarn Operations Issue Date: 30/04/2020 ENV-TS-RP-0227 Page 5 of 39 MS982 Annual Compliance Assessment Report 2019 Condition 3.6 of MS982 states: The proponent shall submit to the CEO an annual Compliance Assessment Report by 30 April of each year, or as otherwise agreed by the CEO, addressing the period of the preceding calendar year. The compliance assessment report shall: 1. Be endorsed by the proponent’s Managing Director/General Manager/Chief Executive Officer or a person delegated to sign on the Managing Director’s/General Manager’s /Chief Executive Officer’s behalf; 2. Address the Proponent’s compliance with each condition of this Statement; 3. Describe corrective and preventative actions taken in the event of a non-compliance; 4. Indicate any proposed changes to the Compliance Assessment Plan required by Condition 3.1. This Annual Compliance Assessment Report was prepared in accordance with Condition 3.6 of MS982 for the period between 1 January and 31 December 2018. It takes into consideration that there were two proponents responsible for this Proposal during the reporting period – Cliffs and YIPL. 2. PROJECT STATUS The Windarling, Mt Jackson, and Deception operations continued during the 2019 reporting period. Operations at Mt Jackson were temporarily ceased during the reporting period, with minor works being conducted in J1 Pit July-August. 3. COMPLIANCE 3.1 Non-compliance and Corrective Actions 3.1.1 Clearing Non-compliance One non-compliance was identified during an audit of MS 982’s disturbance data. Clearing of a 0.25ha area depicted in Figure 2, was undertaken by Cliffs during the period May 2014 to July 2014. Based on available records the disturbance was undertaken as part of mine pit
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Flora and Vegetation of the Eastern Goldfields Ranges: Part 4
    Journal of the Royal Society of Western Australia, 84: 71-81, 2001 Flora and vegetation of the Eastern Goldfields Ranges: Part 4. Highclere Hills N Gibson & M N Lyons Science Division, Department of Conservation and Land Management, Wildlife Research Center, PO Box 51 Wanneroo, WA 6065 email: [email protected] [email protected] (Manuscript received July 2000; accepted November 2001) Abstract A study of the flora and plant communities of the Highclere Hills (which lie some 25 km NNW of Bullfinch) recorded 242 taxa in the spring of 1996. Of these, 217 taxa were native and 25 were weeds. The flora list includes Acacia xerophila var brevior, Stenanthemum newbeyi and Tricoryne tuberosa ms, which represent significant range extensions for these taxa. No endemic taxa were found on the Highclere Hills. Five community types were defined from 45 quadrats spread across the Hills. The distribution of these community types appears to be primarily related to edaphic factors that were largely independent of topographic position. None of the five community types is known from conservation reserves. The vegetation patterning of the Highclere Hills is not as complex as that found on nearby ranges due to a more subdued topography. There has been widespread impact on the vegetation of the Highclere Hills by mineral exploration and mining and there is an urgent need to improve environmental management of mineral exploration activities. Keywords: vegetation, flora, Highclere Hills, survey Introduction have occurred during the Cainozoic (the last 65 MY). The net result is a very subdued landscape given the long pe- The Highclere Hills are composed primarily of riod of erosion this area has undergone.
    [Show full text]
  • Acacia Caesaneura Maslin & J.E.Reid
    WATTLE Acacias of Australia Acacia caesaneura Maslin & J.E.Reid Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com B.R. Maslin B.R. Maslin B.R. Maslin Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com B.R. Maslin Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com B.R. Maslin B.R. Maslin See illustration. Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com B.R. Maslin Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com See illustration. See illustration. See illustration. Acacia caesaneura occurrence map. O ccurrence map generated via Atlas of Living Australia (https://w w w .ala.org.au). Common Name Western Blue Mulga Family Fabaceae Distribution Endemic in W.A. with most collections from an area bounded approximately by Yalgoo, Meekatharra, Lorna Glen Stn (c.
    [Show full text]
  • Background Detailed Flora and Vegetation Assessment
    Our ref: EEN18041.003 Level 2, 27-31 Troode Street West Perth WA 6005 T +61 8 9211 1111 Date: 04 June 2019 Tanya McColgan Bellevue Gold Limited Suite 3, Level 3, 24 Outram Street WEST PERTH WA 6008 Dear Tanya, Flora and vegetation values identified within PoW 79431 In response to your request for the preliminary results of the detailed flora and vegetation assessment undertaken over the Bellevue Gold Project area, RPS Australia West Pty Ltd (RPS) herein provides a summary of the key results and outcomes of the assessment in lieu of the final report which is due in July. Background Bellevue Gold Ltd (Bellevue Gold) is currently undertaking an exploration drilling program within mining tenement M3625 for the Bellevue Gold Project (the Project). The Project is located in the north-eastern Goldfields; approximately 40 km north of the township of Leinster in the Shire of Leonora. The Project is situated on and surrounded by pastoral lands and is located on Yakabindie cattle station. RPS was commissioned by Bellevue Gold to undertake a detailed flora and vegetation assessment over M3625 and part of M3624 to encompass the area where exploration drilling is currently underway and including the potential mining and associated infrastructure footprint (the proposed development area). The survey area, the proposed development area and the PoW 79431 area are shown in Figure A. RPS understands that the Department of Mines, Industry Regulation and Safety (DMIRS) and the Department of Biodiversity Conservation and Attractions (DBCA) have requested additional information regarding the natural values of the PoW area, where in-fill drilling is proposed, in order to adequately assess the PoW application.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Attachments-Yaringa Quarry
    List of Attachments-Yaringa Quarry The following are a list of attachments associated with the Yaringa Works Approval – Attachment 1-Yaringa Quarry Vertices co-ordinates – Attachment 2-Yaringa Quarry Proposed Premises Map – Attachment 3A-Yaringa Quarry Estimated road building production program – Attachment 3B-Yaringa Clearing Area – Attachment 3-Key Plant and Equipment Nov 2016 – Attachment 3-Process Flowchart – Attachment 3-Proposed layout of machinery on site (approximate may change depending on site requirements and conditions) – Attachment 3-Yaringa Stockpile Layout Plan – Attachment 7-Nearest sensitive receiver from project area – Attachment 7-Siting and location Yaringa Quarry – Attachment 7-Yaringa Quarry Proximity to Hamelin Pool and Shark Bay – Attachment 10-Fee Calculator Outputs – Attachment 11-Yaringa Quarry PEIA and EMP – Biological Survey Page 1 of 1 Vertices Longitude Latitude 0 114.31174 -25.9992 1 114.31171 -25.9996 2 114.30988 -25.9995 3 114.30854 -25.9994 4 114.30905 -25.9983 5 114.31068 -26.0005 6 114.31068 -26.0025 7 114.30816 -26.0024 8 114.30814 -26.0002 9 114.30866 -26.0016 10 114.30932 -26.0016 11 114.3093 -26.002 12 114.30869 -26.0019 13 114.31456 -25.9999 14 114.31539 -26.0008 15 114.31516 -26.0009 16 114.31469 -26.0006 17 114.3144 -26.0003 18 114.31409 -26.0001 19 114.31384 -26.0011 20 114.31349 -26.0011 21 114.31216 -25.9998 22 114.31432 -25.9987 23 114.31541 -25.9983 24 114.31723 -25.9988 25 114.31651 -26.0004 26 114.30813 -26.0002 27 114.31724 -26.0007 28 114.31656 -26.0008 29 114.31579 -26.0012 30 114.31539
    [Show full text]
  • Charles Darwin Reserve
    CHARLES DARWIN RESERVE (WHITE WELLS STATION) WESTERN AUSTRALIA FIELD HERBARIUM Volunteers of the Bushland Plant Survey Project Wildflower Society of Western Australia (Inc.) PO Box 519 Floreat WA 6014 for Bush Heritage Australia July 2010 This project was supported by the Wildflower Society of Western Australia Support was also provided by the WA Department of Environment and Conservation NOTE: This Field Herbarium is to remain the property of Bush Heritage, in so long as the Reserve is managed sympathetically with the bushland, and the owners are able to care for the Herbarium so it does not deteriorate. In the event these criteria cannot be met the Field Herbarium is to be handed over to the Geraldton Regional Herbarium. For further information contact the WA Herbarium, Department of Environment and Conservation, Locked Bag 104, Bentley Delivery Centre, WA 6983 Phone (08) 9334 0500. Charles Darwin Reserve (White Wells Station), Western Australia – Field Herbarium CONTENTS 1 BACKGROUND AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS..................................................................................... 1 Map 1 Wildflower Society of WA survey sites at Charles Darwin Reserve - August 2008 .......................... 2 Map 2 Wildflower Society of WA survey sites at Charles Darwin Reserve – October 2008 ........................ 3 2 FLORA ........................................................................................................................................................... 4 3 THE FIELD HERBARIUM ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Clearing Permit Decision Report
    Clearing Permit Decision Report 1. Application details 1.1. Permit application details Permit application No.: 6760/1 Permit type: Purpose Permit 1.2. Proponent details Proponent’s name: HBJ Minerals Pty Ltd 1.3. Property details Property: Mining Lease 25/357 Local Government Area: City of Kalgoorlie-Boulder Colloquial name: Cannon Gold Project 1.4. Application Clearing Area (ha) No. Trees Method of Clearing For the purpose of: 40 Mechanical Removal Mineral Exploration, Mineral Production and Associated Activities 1.5. Decision on application Decision on Permit Application: Grant Decision Date: 12 November 2015 2. Site Information 2.1. Existing environment and information 2.1.1. Description of the native vegetation under application Vegetation Description Beard vegetation associations have been mapped for the whole of Western Australia. One Beard vegetation association has been mapped within the application area (GIS Database): Beard vegetation association 468: Medium woodland, salmon gum and goldfields blackbutt. A level one flora and vegetation study incorporating a desktop assessment and a field component was undertaken in August 2015 by Botanica Consulting (2015). This survey identified ten broad vegetation types within the study area: Eucalypt Woodland CLP-EW1: Low woodland of Eucalyptus salmonophloia over heath of Eremophila scoparia and dwarf scrub of Atriplex vesicaria / Sclerolaena diacantha; CLP-EW2: Forest of Eucalyptus lesouefii over low scrub of Eremophila scoparia and dwarf scrub of Cratystylis conocephala ; CLP-EW3: Low
    [Show full text]
  • Geraldton Mt Magnet Road SLK 222.45 Biological Survey May 2012
    Main Roads Western Australia Report for Material Source Area: Geraldton Mt Magnet Road SLK 222.45 Biological Survey May 2012 This Report: has been prepared by GHD for Main Roads Western Australia (MRWA) and may only be used and relied on by MRWA for the purpose agreed between GHD and MRWA as set out in section 1.3 of this Report. GHD otherwise disclaims responsibility to any person other than MRWA arising in connection with this Report. GHD also excludes implied warranties and conditions, to the extent legally permissible. The services undertaken by GHD in connection with preparing this Report were limited to those specifically detailed in the Report and are subject to the scope limitations set out in the Report. The opinions, conclusions and any recommendations in this Report are based on conditions encountered and information reviewed at the date of preparation of the Report. GHD has no responsibility or obligation to update this Report to account for events or changes occurring subsequent to the date that the Report was prepared. The opinions, conclusions and any recommendations in this Report are based on assumptions made by GHD described in this Report. GHD disclaims liability arising from any of the assumptions being incorrect. GHD has prepared this Report on the basis of information provided by MRWA and others who provided information to GHD (including Government authorities), which GHD has not independently verified or checked beyond the agreed scope of work. GHD does not accept liability in connection with such unverified information, including errors and omissions in the Report which were caused by errors or omissions in that information.” The opinions, conclusions and any recommendations in this Report are based on information obtained from, and testing undertaken at or in connection with, specific sample points.
    [Show full text]
  • BHP BILLITON YEELIRRIE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY PTY LTD Yeelirrie Project Flora and Vegetation Survey Baseline Report February
    BHP BILLITON YEELIRRIE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY PTY LTD Yeelirrie Project Flora and Vegetation Survey Baseline Report February 2011 Prepared by: For: Western Botanical URS Australia Pty Ltd PO Box 3393 Level 3, 20 Terrace Rd BASSENDEAN WA East Perth WA 6004 28th February 2011 Report Ref: WB653 Yeelirrie Project Flora and Vegetation Baseline Survey February 2011 Document Status Version Date Distribution 0 28.02.2011 URS Australia, Electronic Project Team Field Survey Rebecca Graham, Cheyne Jowett, Geoff Cockerton, Amy Douglas, Daniel Brassington, Jessie-Leigh Brown, Simon Colwill, Sophie Fox, Renee D’Herville, Lewis Trotter, Bridget Watkins, Dr. Carolyn Ringrose, Elly Beatty, Jeremy Macknay, Cassie Adam, Susan Regan, Sam Atkinson, John Rouw and Philip Trevenen. Report Preparation: Rebecca Graham, Geoff Cockerton, Dr. Carolyn Ringrose, Cheyne Jowett, Amy Douglas, Lewis Trotter, Bridget Watkins, Daniel Brassington, Jessie-Leigh Brown, Simon Colwill and Sophie Fox. Acknowledgements: Doug and Lucy Brownlie (Yakabindie Station), Gil and Dale O’Brien (Yeelirrie Homestead) Doug Blandford (DC Blandford & Associates), BHP Billiton Yeelirrie Development Company Pty Ltd field staff and contractors, HeliWest pilots (Simon, Luke, Mike and Brad). Map Production by CAD Resources Pty Ltd Western Botanical i Yeelirrie Project Flora and Vegetation Baseline Survey February 2011 Executive Summary The Proposed Yeelirrie Development (project) at Yeelirrie Pastoral Station, is some 700 km north-east of Perth and 500 km north of Kalgoorlie (Figure 1). BHP Billiton Yeelirrie Development Company Pty Ltd (BHPB Billiton), through URS Australia Pty Ltd, engaged Western Botanical to undertake an assessment of the flora and vegetation within an area referred to as the total study area. The total study area includes the areas studied both locally and regionally.
    [Show full text]
  • Combretaceae: Phylogeny, Biogeography and DNA
    COPYRIGHT AND CITATION CONSIDERATIONS FOR THIS THESIS/ DISSERTATION o Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. o NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes. o ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original. How to cite this thesis Surname, Initial(s). (2012) Title of the thesis or dissertation. PhD. (Chemistry)/ M.Sc. (Physics)/ M.A. (Philosophy)/M.Com. (Finance) etc. [Unpublished]: University of Johannesburg. Retrieved from: https://ujdigispace.uj.ac.za (Accessed: Date). Combretaceae: Phylogeny, Biogeography and DNA Barcoding by JEPHRIS GERE THESIS Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree PHILOSOPHIAE DOCTOR in BOTANY in the Faculty of Science at the University of Johannesburg December 2013 Supervisor: Prof Michelle van der Bank Co-supervisor: Dr Olivier Maurin Declaration I declare that this thesis has been composed by me and the work contained within, unless otherwise stated, is my own. _____________________ J. Gere (December 2013) Table of contents Table of contents i Abstract v Foreword vii Index to figures ix Index to tables xv Acknowledgements xviii List of abbreviations xxi Chapter 1: General introduction and objectives 1.1 General introduction 1 1.2 Vegetative morphology 2 1.2.1 Leaf morphology and anatomy 2 1.2.2. Inflorescence 3 1.2.3 Fruit morphology 4 1.3 DNA barcoding 5 1.4 Cytology 6 1.5 Fossil record 7 1.6 Distribution and habitat 7 1.7 Economic Importance 8 1.8 Taxonomic history 9 1.9 Aims and objectives of the study 11 i Table of contents Chapter 2: Molecular phylogeny of Combretaceae with implications for infrageneric classification within subtribe Terminaliinae.
    [Show full text]
  • Flora and Vegetation Surveys Is Provided in EPA Guidance Statement No
    Yeelirrie Uranium Project Public Environmental Review Section Nine: Environmental Factors from one or more localities but do not meet adequacy of survey requirements and appear to be under immediate threat from known threatening processes. Priority Two: Poorly-known taxa. Taxa that are known from one or a few collections or sight records, some of which are on lands not under imminent threat of habitat destruction or degradation (e.g. national parks, conservation parks, nature reserves, State forest, vacant Crown land, water reserves, etc.). Taxa may be included if they are comparatively well known from one or more localities but do not meet adequacy of survey requirements and appear to be under threat from known threatening processes. Priority Three: Poorly-known taxa. Taxa that are known from collections or sight records from several localities not under imminent threat, or from few but widespread localities with either large population size or significant remaining areas of apparently suitable habitat, much of it not under imminent threat. Taxa may be included if they are comparatively well known from several localities but do not meet adequacy of survey requirements and known threatening processes exist that could affect them. Priority Four: Rare, Near Threatened and other taxa in need of monitoring. (a) Rare: Taxa that are considered to have been adequately surveyed, or for which sufficient knowledge is available, and that are considered not currently threatened or in need of special protection, but could be if present circumstances change. These taxa are usually represented on conservation lands; (b) Near Threatened: Taxa that are considered to have been adequately surveyed and that do not qualify for Conservation Dependent, but that are close to qualifying for Vulnerable; (c) Other: Taxa that have been removed from the list of threatened species during the past five years for reasons other than taxonomy.
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Flora of Katjarra in the Birriliburu Indigenous Protected Area
    Vascular Flora of Katjarra in the Birriliburu Indigenous Protected Area. Report to the Birriliburu Native Title Claimants and Central Desert Native Title Services N. Gibson, M.A. Langley, S. van Leeuwen & K. Brown Western Australian Department of Parks and Wildlife December 2014 © Crown copyright reserved Katjarra Vascular Flora Survey Contents List of contributors 2 Abstract 3 1. Introduction 3 2. Methods 3 2.1 Site selection 3 2.2 Collection methods 6 2.3 Identifying the collections 6 2.4 Determining geographic extent 6 3. Results 13 3.1 Overview of collecting 13 3.2 Taxa newly recorded for Katjarra 13 3.3 Conservation listed taxa 13 3.4 Geographically restricted taxa 14 3.5 Un-named taxa 20 4. Discussion 22 Acknowledgements 23 References 24 Appendix 1. List of vascular flora occurring at Katjarra within the Birriliburu IPA. 25 List of contributors Name Institution Qualifications/area of Level/form of contribution expertise Neil Gibson Dept Parks & Wildlife Botany Principal author Stephen van Leeuwen Dept Parks & Wildlife Botany Principal author Margaret Langley Dept Parks & Wildlife Botany Principal author Kate Brown Dept Parks & Wildlife Botany Principal author / Photographer Ben Anderson University of Western Australia Botany Survey participant Jennifer Jackson Dept Parks & Wildlife Conservation Officer Survey participant Julie Futter Dept Parks & Wildlife EIA Co-ordinator Survey participant Robyn Camozzato Dept Parks & Wildlife Conservation Employee Survey participant Kirsty Quinlan Dept Parks & Wildlife Invertebrates Survey participant Neville Hague Dept Parks & Wildlife Regional Ops. Manager Survey participant Megan Muir Dept Parks & Wildlife Conservation Officer Survey participant All photos: K. Brown. Cover photo: View looking north from Katjarra.
    [Show full text]
  • Jewel Bugs of Australia (Insecta, Heteroptera, Scutelleridae)1
    © Biologiezentrum Linz/Austria; download unter www.biologiezentrum.at Jewel Bugs of Australia (Insecta, Heteroptera, Scutelleridae)1 G. CASSIS & L. VANAGS Abstract: The Australian genera of the Scutelleridae are redescribed, with a species exemplar of the ma- le genitalia of each genus illustrated. Scanning electron micrographs are also provided for key non-ge- nitalic characters. The Australian jewel bug fauna comprises 13 genera and 25 species. Heissiphara is described as a new genus, for a single species, H. minuta nov.sp., from Western Australia. Calliscyta is restored as a valid genus, and removed from synonymy with Choerocoris. All the Australian species of Scutelleridae are described, and an identification key is given. Two new species of Choerocoris are des- cribed from eastern Australia: C. grossi nov.sp. and C. lattini nov.sp. Lampromicra aerea (DISTANT) is res- tored as a valid species, and removed from synonymy with L. senator (FABRICIUS). Calliphara nobilis (LIN- NAEUS) is recorded from Australia for the first time. Calliphara billardierii (FABRICIUS) and C. praslinia praslinia BREDDIN are removed from the Australian biota. The identity of Sphaerocoris subnotatus WAL- KER is unknown and is incertae sedis. A description is also given for the Neotropical species, Agonoso- ma trilineatum (FABRICIUS); a biological control agent recently introduced into Australia to control the pasture weed Bellyache Bush (Jatropha gossypifolia, Euphorbiaceae). Coleotichus borealis DISTANT and C. (Epicoleotichus) schultzei TAUEBER are synonymised with C. excellens (WALKER). Callidea erythrina WAL- KER is synonymized with Lampromicra senator. Lectotype designations are given for the following taxa: Coleotichus testaceus WALKER, Coleotichus excellens, Sphaerocoris circuliferus (WALKER), Callidea aureocinc- ta WALKER, Callidea collaris WALKER and Callidea curtula WALKER.
    [Show full text]