IN THIS ISSUE Co-Sponsor Memos Bill Actions Press Conferences

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

IN THIS ISSUE Co-Sponsor Memos Bill Actions Press Conferences July 29, 2016 IN THIS ISSUE Co-Sponsor Memos Bill Actions Press Conferences PA Bulletin Upcoming Events Session Schedule In the News Co-Sponsor Memos HCO3439 Boback, Karen Provides civil immunity for any damage that may be done to the vehicle when forceful entry is necessary to rescue a child. Bill History: 07-25-16 H Filed HCO3443 Kim, Patty Grants PA courts greater discretion in determining whether or not to send conviction records of those convicted of the offense of possession of a small amount of marijuana to PennDOT. Bill History: 07-27-16 H Filed HCO3445 Conklin, Scott Requires any emergency vehicle transporting a police dog to be equipped with a K-9 heat-detection device. Bill History: 07-28-16 H Filed Bill Actions HB 2270 Metzgar, Carl Act designating a bridge on that portion of State Route 2016 over the Casselman River, Rockwood Borough, Somerset County, as the PFC Alton Glenn Sterner Memorial Bridge. Bill History: 07-26-16 H Filed 07-28-16 H Introduced and referred to committee on House Transportation Press Conferences SENATOR RAFFERTY TAKES QUESTIONS FROM PENNSYLVANIA PRESS CLUB By Mark W. Wolfe, Pennsylvania Legislative Services Intern | July 25, 2016 This afternoon the Pennsylvania Press Club held one of their regular luncheons. The guest of honor was Senator John Rafferty (R-Montgomery), Republican candidate for Attorney General. Sen. Rafferty began by stating that during this election cycle, he has seen the most public interest in what exactly the Office of Attorney General (OAG) does, and what he would do to “right the ship” of the office. He emphasized the AG’s dual role as the chief law enforcement official and the chief lawyer of the commonwealth, positions that he said must be filled by an individual with broad range of legal experience. Sen. Rafferty listed his experience with prosecuting Medicaid fraud cases in OAG and civil litigation focusing on education, real estate, business, zoning, and mental health law in private practice - credentials which he said outpace the real world and legal experience of his opponent, Josh Shapiro, also of Montgomery County. Sen. Rafferty also touted his 13 years as a legislator, during which, he said, he defended Pennsylvania families and stood with police officers in the fulfillment of their duties. PLS’s Transportation Recap – Copyright 2016 – Pennsylvania Legislative Services – www.mypls.com July 29, 2016 Sen. Rafferty declared OAG not to be an office for political activism, instead one that should focus on enforcing the laws of the commonwealth and protecting its residents. Recently, he said, the office has been used for political gain and personal vendettas, miring OAG in scandals and reducing the morale of staff and trust from the public. Joking that some consider “AG” to stand for “aspiring governor,” Sen. Rafferty stated that he intends to seek no higher office than Attorney General, which he said makes him the candidate who will restore integrity to the office. Moving on to policy matters of importance, Sen. Rafferty lamented the continuation of “pay-to-play” despite increased prosecutions against elected officials. He firmly declared that this culture must end not just in Harrisburg, but in county courthouses as well; that all public officials must take seriously their role as stewards of taxpayer dollars. Next, Sen. Rafferty said that his OAG would partner with district attorneys (DAs) to deal with the heroin “crisis,” emphasizing that this situation merits a more urgent term than “epidemic.” He stated that DAs are uniquely qualified to deal with street dealers, while OAG focuses resources from wiretaps to grand juries for mid- and high-level distribution operations. While supporting a measure to impose mandatory minimum sentences on drug dealers, Sen. Rafferty acknowledged that the commonwealth cannot “jail our way out” of the heroin crisis. So, he continued, his campaign has spoken to medical professionals about treatment for nonviolent offenders, something which he has had personal experience with as a member of the steering committee for the commonwealth’s Veterans Courts. Sen. Rafferty stated that his office would send agents and former addicts to educate students on the dangers of drug use and addiction. Another priority of his office, Sen. Rafferty said, would be Pennsylvania’s children and seniors. On the former, he emphasized that he has “zero tolerance” for child abusers. He emphasized his work in the Senate to bring Jessica’s Law to the commonwealth, address the “Kids for Cash” scandal, tighten restrictions on Megan’s Law, and increase penalties for individuals charged with driving under the influence with minor children in the car, all of which, he said, fostered for Pennsylvania children a “safe environment to thrive and to grow.” For senior residents, Sen. Rafferty said that his office would, possibly through the use of tourism revenue, help educate older individuals on fraudulent phone calls and other communications that seek personal information. Sen. Rafferty stated that his OAG would seek to accomplish these goals through the creation and maintenance of consensus and coalitions, which he said he has done during his time in the Senate for landmark legislation such as the comprehensive transportation funding law, Act 89 of 2013. He hopes to work closely with DAs, state agencies, and other elected officials. Sen. Rafferty concluded by reiterating that the “awesome authority” of Pennsylvania’s Attorney General must be wielded by someone who understands the office and is committed to be AG, not any other position. He described himself as an “independent leader” with a “plan and a vision to move the commonwealth of Pennsylvania forward,” unmatched experience, and the right temperament and values for the job. Sen. Rafferty then took questions from those present. Do you think it is appropriate for the state’s Attorney General to sue the state, as Shapiro has said he would do over education issues? The Commonwealth Attorneys Act states that the AG must defend the commonwealth against lawsuits. Further, the appropriation of education funding is left to the Legislature and Governor under the state constitution. I would not let a judge determine how taxpayer dollars will be distributed. The AG does not sue the state, and I would not. What do you think First Deputy AG Bruce Castor should do about the potential release of the email report? Should it be released before or after Kathleen Kane’s trial? First of all, my campaign has already laid out a policy for proper use of government property. On this matter, OAG should have made any information public from day one, not piecemeal for any hidden agenda. Now, at such a critical stage, Castor should wait until after the trial to avoid prejudice in the jury pool, especially since the individual who conducted the study of the emails found no criminal activity. What if some of the people in the Montgomery County court system were involved in the exchange of these emails? Knowing the individual referenced in this question, he would file motions to disqualify any individuals who may fall into this category. It does not benefit the goal of a fair trial to release this information before the trial and possibly prejudice the jury pool. How do you proposed eliminating pay-to-play without addressing limitations on campaign contributions? I was a member of the ad hoc committee to reform political campaigns when I was first elected to the Senate. Public officials should have the “intestinal fortitude” to do what is right and not consider a campaign contribution to unlock a PLS’s Transportation Recap – Copyright 2016 – Pennsylvania Legislative Services – www.mypls.com July 29, 2016 door to favors. Integrity in office is essential in Harrisburg and in local governments, and anyone who does not face up to that should not run for public office. Do you believe that Hillary Clinton should have been prosecuted for her use of a private email server during her time as Secretary of State? Given the recent hacking scandal, the safety of a private server is called into question. I believe that Clinton acted in gross negligence and should have been prosecuted. I would like to know my opponent’s view on this. It was recently reported that Kathleen Kane spent $400,000 on outside legal fees for lawsuits brought by former employees. What is your opinion on this situation? There are extremely good professionals in that office whose morale has been devastated. Better management techniques and integrity in office could have eliminated the possibility of these lawsuits and used these hundreds of thousands of dollars to fight the heroin epidemic or protect senior residents. Personal vendettas in OAG must stop. What is the status of your reform bill on the Delaware River Port Authority (DRPA)? I have worked on DRPA reforms for about six years. One bill, SB 286, gives Pennsylvania’s governor a power enjoyed by New Jersey’s, veto power over state delegation actions. The second, SB 287, is more comprehensive, outlawing pay-to-play and adding further transparency measures, including requiring Senate confirmation of the Governor’s appointees to the commonwealth’s DRPA delegation. The Governor has stated that he would veto this bill, but he should sign it if he believes in a fair and accountable government. Because of this stated opposition, however, these “much needed” reforms are idle in the House of Representatives, having passed through the Senate. You have criticized Shapiro over “sanctuary cities.” What can OAG do about that? Is it more of a federal issue? I think that this is a state issue because state resources are spent in these areas. I support a measure, SB 997, which would outlaw sanctuary cities in Pennsylvania. Undocumented people are in these cities, which means that undocumented people committing crimes may be there.
Recommended publications
  • In the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
    Case 2:15-cv-06082-HB Document 51 Filed 12/02/16 Page 1 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA FRANK NOONAN, et al. : CIVIL ACTION : : v. : : : KATHLEEN KANE, et al. : NO. 15-6082 MEMORANDUM Bartle, J. December 2, 2016 Before the court is the motion of plaintiffs “pursuant to Rule 60(b) to vacate order granting defendant Kane’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ amended complaint and seeking leave to file a second amended complaint.” Plaintiffs are Frank Noonan, Randy Feathers, Richard A. Sheetz, Jr., E. Marc Costanzo, and Frank Fina. Noonan is the retired Commissioner of the Pennsylvania State Police. Feathers is a retired Regional Director of the Bureau of Narcotics and Investigation and Control of the Office of the Attorney General of Pennsylvania (“OAG”). Sheetz served as a former Executive Deputy Attorney General Directing the Criminal Law Division of the OAG. Costanzo is a former Deputy Attorney General for the OAG. Finally, Fina is a former Chief Deputy Attorney General for the OAG. Plaintiffs’ first amended complaint contained claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and supplemental state law claims Case 2:15-cv-06082-HB Document 51 Filed 12/02/16 Page 2 of 4 involving six defendants: former Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane; Michael Miletto, an investigator for the Office of the Attorney General; the Philadelphia Daily News; one of its reporters, Christopher Brennan; and Philadelphia Media Network, LLC and Philadelphia Media Network (Digital) LLC, which together own the Philadelphia Daily News. Plaintiffs alleged that Kane, in violation of § 1983, retaliated against them for engaging in speech protected by the First Amendment.
    [Show full text]
  • Staring Down Change
    WIDENERWidener UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW VolumeLaw 20 Number 1 SPRING 2013 Staring Down Change A NEW ERA IN LEGAL Education Invest in Opportunity Grow your career with our MJ programming For more information, visit law.widener.edu/mj Health Law, Corporate & Business Law, Regulatory Compliance, and more Online and on campus | CCB and HCCA accredited JUST ANNOUNCED! Widener Law’s MJ programs in Corporate and Health Law are now available with a Global Compliance Concentration. FEATURING: Game Change 40 Years Young Going Mobile Health law, compliance, and a new era Roe v. Wade The reinvented law classroom Widener University School of Law Magazine CONTRIBUTING WRITERS: Mary Allen, Ashley Barton, Peter Castagna, John Culhane, Erin Daly, Nathan Garrison, Laurie Grant, Eileen Grena, G. Randy Lee, Todd Lineburger, Mary Marzolla, Gilberte Pierre, Ed Sonnenberg, Katrina Womack, Nancy Ravert Ward PHOTOGRAPHY: Mary Allen, Linda Ammons, Ashley Barton, Peter Castagna, Nathan Garrison, Laurie Grant, Todd Lineburger, Nancy Ravert Ward MAGAZINE ADVISORY BOARD: Mary Allen, Linda Ammons, Susan Goldberg, Laurie Grant, Eileen Grena-Piretti, J. Patrick Kelly, Todd Lineburger, Robyn Meadows, Keith Sealing, Constance Sweeney, Nancy Ravert Ward EDITOR: Todd Lineburger WIDENER UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW | Volume 20 Number 1 | SPRING 2013 Widener University School of Law Widener University School of Law Board of Overseers National Advisory Council Eugene D. McGurk, Jr., Esq. ’78, Chair Michael J. Aiello, Esq. ’94 Dean Linda L. Ammons, JD, Ex Officio Howard K. Alperin, Esq. ’90 Joseph M. Asher, Esq. ’93 Renae B. Axelrod, Esq. ’91, Ex Officio Steven P. Barsamian, Esq. ’75 Miriam Benton Barish, Esq. ’92 Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • Smallman Street PITTSBURGH, PA 15201
    OFFERING MEMORANDUM Aerial View - Rear 32206 smallman street PITTSBURGH, PA 15201 All SVN® Offices Independently Owned & Operated. ©2020 All Rights Reserved. DISCLAIMER The material contained in this Offering Brochure is furnished solely for the purpose of considering the purchase of the property within and is not to be used for any other purpose. This information should not, under any circumstances, be photocopied or disclosed to any third party TABLE OF without the written consent of the SVN® Advisor or Property Owner, or used for any purpose whatsoever other than to evaluate the possible purchase of the Property. The only party authorized to represent the Owner in connection with the sale of the Property is the SVN Advisor listed in this proposal, and no other person is authorized by the Owner to CONTENTS provide any information or to make any representations other than contained in this Offering Brochure. If the person receiving these materials does not choose to pursue a purchase of the Property, this Offering Brochure must be returned to the SVN Advisor. Neither the SVN Advisor nor the Owner make any representation or warranty, express or implied, as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained herein, and nothing contained herein is or shall be relied upon as a promise or representation as to the future representation of the Property. This Offering Brochure may include certain statements and estimates with respect to the Property. These Assumptions may or may not be proven to be correct, and there can be no assurance that such estimates will be achieved. Further, the SVN Advisor and the Owner EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 disclaim any and all liability for representations or warranties, expressed or implied, contained in or omitted from this Offering Brochure, or any other written or oral communication transmitted CONCEPTUAL PLANS & PHOTOS 9 or made available to the recipient.
    [Show full text]
  • ATTACHMENT 1: Site Directions Detailed Written Directions to the Site Washington County
    ATTACHMENT 1: Site Directions Detailed Written Directions to the Site Washington County From the DEP Southwest Regional Office to Ross Road Block Valve (354 Ross Road, Eighty Four, PA 15330): Head south on Waterfront Drive (0.2 mi). Slight right onto 30th St Bridge (476ft). Turn right onto River Ave (148 ft). Turn left onto 31st St Bridge (154 ft). Turn left onto the Pennsylvania 28 ramp (0.2mi). Merge onto PA‐28 S (0.9mi). Take the Interstate 279 S/Interstate 376 W exit (0.4 mi). Merge onto I‐279 S (0.9 mi). Take the exit onto I‐376 W/Fort Pitt Bridge (5.7 mi). Take exit 64A to merge onto I‐79 S toward Washington (13.6mi). Take exit 45 toward PA‐980/Canonsburg (0.2 mi). Turn left onto McClelland Rd (1.2 mi). Turn left onto US‐19 N (1.0 mi). Turn right onto Waterdam Rd (2.3 mi). Slight right onto Thomas Rd (0.5 mi). Turn right onto Ross Rd (0.8 mi). The Ross Road Block Valve will be on the left about 0.8 miles down the road. From the Washington County Conservation District to Ross Road Block Valve (354 Ross Road, Eighty Four, PA 15330): Head southeast on N Main St toward Country Club Rd (75 ft). Turn left onto Country Club Rd (0.9 mi). Turn left onto Pike St (0.7 mi). Turn right onto Racetrack Rd (1.5 mi). Turn left onto US‐19 N (2.5 mi). Turn right onto Linden Rd (2.6 mi).
    [Show full text]
  • Template Both for Areas That Violate Both 1997 and the 2006 PM2 | US
    Pennsylvania Area Designations for the 2008 Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards The table below identifies the areas and associated counties or parts of counties in Pennsylvania that EPA intends to designate as nonattainment for the 2008 ozone national ambient air quality standards (2008 NAAQS). In accordance with section 107(d) of the Clean Air Act, EPA must designate an area “nonattainment” if it is violating the 2008 ozone NAAQS or if it is contributing to a violation of the 2008 ozone NAAQS in a nearby area. The technical analyses supporting the boundaries for the individual nonattainment areas are provided below. Intended Nonattainment Areas in Pennsylvania Pennsylvania Recommended EPA’s Intended Area Nonattainment Counties Nonattainment Counties Allentown-Bethlehem- Lehigh Carbon, Lehigh, Northampton Easton Lancaster Lancaster Lancaster Philadelphia-Wilmington- Bucks, Montgomery, Bucks, Chester, Delaware, Atlantic City Philadelphia Montgomery, Philadelphia Allegheny, Armstrong, Pittsburgh-Beaver Valley Allegheny Beaver, Butler, Fayette, Washington, Westmoreland Reading Berks Berks The Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City Area is a multi-state nonattainment area. Table 1 in the Technical Analysis for the Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City Area, below, identifies the counties in the other states that EPA intends to designate as part of the nonattainment area. EPA intends to designate the remaining counties in Pennsylvania that are not listed in the table above as “unclassifiable/attainment” for the 2008 ozone NAAQS. The analysis below provides the basis for intended nonattainment area boundaries. It relies on our analysis of whether and which monitors are violating the 2008 ozone NAAQS, based on certified air quality monitoring data from 2008-2010 and an evaluation of whether nearby areas are contributing to such violations.
    [Show full text]
  • Kane's Reign Ends Today
    Steve Esack and Peter Hall Of The Morning Call 8/17/16 Kane's reign ends today HARRISBURG — Kathleen Kane charged into state government 1,381 days ago as a reformer unbound by the political establishment she railed against in her successful campaign to become the state's first woman elected attorney general. On Wednesday, she slinks away, leaving behind her once bright political future and a resignation letter after abusing the power voters entrusted in her as the state's top law enforcement officer. "I have been honored to serve the people of Pennsylvania and I wish them health and safety in all their days," Kane said Tuesday in a two-sentence resignation. The announcement came a day after a jury of six men and six women convicted her on two felony counts of perjury and seven lesser charges of lying and abusing her power about a grand jury secrets leak she orchestrated to embarrass a rival. It also came after Montgomery County Judge Wendy Demchick-Alloy set an Oct. 24 sentencing date for the Scranton-area Democrat. The state constitution says public officials must resign after being convicted of a crime, but state court rulings have pushed resignations back until sentencing. Kane negated that with her decision to quit after months of refusing to heed such advice from politicians. Kane lawyers vow appeal, but offer few details In a statement, Gov. Tom Wolf, a Democrat, said Kane is making the right call. "What has transpired with Attorney General Kane is unfortunate," Wolf said. "Her decision to resign is the right one, and will allow the people of Pennsylvania to finally move on." The Commonwealth Attorneys Act states that the first deputy slides into the attorney general's post if the elected or appointed official resigns or becomes incapacitated.
    [Show full text]
  • The Indictment of Longtime Harrisburg Mayor Stephen Reed: What Comes Next?
    The Indictment of Longtime Harrisburg Mayor Stephen Reed: What Comes Next? Who is the accused? Stephen Reed, the Democratic mayor of Harrisburg, Pennsylvania from 1982 to 2010, has been charged by state prosecutors with 499 counts ranging from bribery to theft by receiving stolen property. What do state prosecutors allege? The allegations include claims that Reed used his position to arrange the sale of bonds by several agencies within the city. To secure approval of the bond sales, he allegedly diverted city funds to a slush fund for city council members. Bond proceeds went to various pet projects including the purchase of various antiquities, such as Civil War memorabilia and artifacts from the American West that he planned to display in new city museums. Reed stored those artifacts in his own home, among other private facilities, and misled investigators about the existence and extent of these collections. Why does this case matter? Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane called Reed’s alleged wrongdoing “the root of the fiscal issues that continue to plague the city of Harrisburg.” Under Reed’s watch, the city of merely 50,000 inhabitants—of whom nearly a third live in poverty—accrued over $450 million dollars in debt. More than half of this debt went to a white-elephant project to retrofit a trash incinerator. In 2011, the state government placed the city in receivership. In 2013, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission charged Harrisburg with securities fraud for misrepresenting its poor financial health under Reed—the first time a U.S. city has faced such charges.
    [Show full text]
  • “3Rd Annual UPMC Psychosomatic Medicine Conference” (MD21)
    Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic of UPMC Psychosomatic Medicine/Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry Office of Educational Resources and Planning University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine Center for Continuing Education in the Health Sciences Community Care Behavioral Health Organization “3rd Annual UPMC Psychosomatic Medicine Conference” (MD21) Saturday, April 21, 2018 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM Thomas E. Starzl Biomedical Science Tower South Room S120 University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Course Directors: Priya Gopalan, MD Pierre Azzam, MD Recovery and Wellness: The Journey Starts Here A Joint Effort Sponsored by Community Care Behavioral Health Organization and Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic of UPMC UPMC Psychosomatic Medicine April 21, 2018 Biomedical Science Tower Introduction Psychosomatic medicine remains a challenging field. Subspecialty areas in psychosomatic medicine make it more complicated to diagnose, treat, and refer patients with complex medical comorbidities. Providers need to provide best practice comprehensive psychiatric consultation evaluations with thorough consideration of psychiatric, medical, and psychosocial factors. The UPMC Psychosomatic Medicine Conference is a one-day meeting that will highlight local and regional talent in consultation-liaison (CL) psychiatry. Through dynamic speakers and experts in the field, it will provide an update on clinical care and research at the interface of psychiatry and other medical specialties. These will include primary care services, integrated care, the opioid epidemic and mindfulness, and special populations such as pediatrics, transgender care, psycho-oncology, and pain and psychiatry. The conference will give an up-to-date overview of community resources in addition to research studies in the area of psychosomatic medicine to enable participants to incorporate them into individual practice and discern their applicability to clinical care.
    [Show full text]
  • A Little Voter Suppression Is Not OK’ with Enough of the Disenfranchised Driscoll, a Spokesperson “And So, What Happened Rent,” Carbone Said
    With COVID restrictions eased, in-person workouts balance health and crowding TThhee CChhaarrllootttteeTHE VOICE P POF THE BLACKo oCOMMUNITYss SINCEtt 1906 WEEK OF JULY 8, 2021 VOLUME 47, NUMBER 44 WWW.THECHARLOTTEPOST.COM $1.50 NC renters at risk of eviction after July By Mark Darrough CAROLINA PUBLIC PRESS North Carolina’s Council of State voted along party lines last week to reject a one-month extension of the governor’s residential eviction moratorium, leaving tenants in limbo as a federal ban continues through July 31. Gov. Roy Cooper’s Executive Order 171, enacted in October, clarified and strengthened a fed- eral eviction moratorium issued by the national Centers for Disease Control and Prevention after studies showed eviction cases caused a further spread of COVID- 19 from evictees moving into other people’s residences or into home- less shelters. TROY HULL | THE CHARLOTTE POST “It’s disappointing to see Council With the conservative-leaning Supreme Court creating new guidelines for brining lawsuits against states under a key provision of the Voting Rights of State members revoke eviction Act, it’ll become more difficult to prove suppression based on race. protections for people still strug- gling to stay in their homes,” Cooper said after the vote. Six Republicans on the nine- member Council of State voted to ‘A little voter suppression is let the moratorium expire, remov- ing one of the state’s key tools in preventing evictions since Sep- tember: making landlords provide tenants a copy of a declaration not OK’ with court rollback form to receive protections under the CDC order.
    [Show full text]
  • A 2017 Wish List for Lawyers and Judges
    NOT FOR REPRINT Click to Print or Select 'Print' in your browser menu to print this document. Page printed from: The Legal Intelligencer A 2017 Wish List for Lawyers and Judges Peter F. Vaira, The Legal Intelligencer January 13, 2017 That the new Pennsylvania attorney general, Josh Shapiro, does not place all the blame for the dysfunctional office he inherited on former Attorney General Kathleen Kane. She was in over her head, which caused her to make a lot of mistakes; however, many of the problems that occurred during her administration were the result of her predecessors and many of the staff members she inherited. This includes the group of prosecutors who made a continuing practice of sending pornographic photos and racial/ethnic jokes to judges they appeared before. • That Attorney General Josh Shapiro releases the names of the prosecutors who sent and the trial judges and supervising grand jury judges who received ex parte emails from them in the porngate scandal. The defense counsel in those cases are entitled to know that there was a less-than-arms-length relationship between the grand jury and trial judges and the prosecutors. Such communications indicate a compromise of the judiciary by the executive branch. The decision made by his interim predecessor, Bruce Beemer, to decline to release the names of the judges and prosecutors should not be a binding precedent. Shapiro should not be bound by a major policy decision made by a five-month temporary attorney general, which will saddle him with problems in criminal cases and his relationship with the courts for years.
    [Show full text]
  • Pittsburgh Workplace Law Symposium Brochure (Apr2014)
    PRESENTS Join us for a half day of interactive discussions and practical solutions addressing the latest developments in workplace law. This unique, fast-paced seminar is geared towards in-house counsel, management and human resources professionals. Thursday, May 22, 2014 Heinz History Center 5th Floor Mueller Center • 1212 Smallman St Pittsburgh, PA 15222 10:00 a.m. – 12:00 p.m. Self-Guided Tour of The History Center (optional) 12:00 p.m. – 1:00 p.m. Lunch & Registration 1:00 p.m. – 5:00 p.m. Program 5:00 p.m. Cocktail Reception 3.50 credit hours for HRCI recertification are currently pending. 3.50 credit hours for Continuing Legal Education (CLE) are currently pending. 10:00 a.m. – Noon Self-Guided Tour of The History Center (Optional and Complimentary) 12:00 – 1:00 p.m. Lunch and Registration 1:00 – 1:50 p.m. Finally: A Fully Confirmed NLRB Board – Watch Out! Presented by: Lynn C. Outwater and Michael J. Stief, III Discussion Topics Include: • New rule-making initiatives • Emerging cautions for union free employers • What you need to be doing now to ensure compliance 2:00 – 2:50 p.m. WHAM! Wage Hour Anxiety Minimized (Seriously!) Presented by: Melissa L. Evans and James A. Prozzi Discussion Topics Include: • Highlights of agency enforcement efforts and what they might mean for your organization • Review of common wage and hour pitfalls • Effective ways to limit risk of exposure 3:00 – 3:50 p.m. FMLA Update Presented by: Donna J. Geary and Sheri L. Giger Discussion Topics Include: • A review of FMLA caselaw • What it means to you 4:00 – 4:50 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • JUSTICE WECHT DECIDED: June 30, 2021 in 2005, Montgomery County District Attorney Bruce Castor Learned That Andrea
    [J-100-2020] INTHE SUPREMECOURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLEDISTRICT BAER, C.J., SAYLOR, TODD, DONOHUE, DOUGHERTY,WECHT, MUNDY, JJ. COMMONWEALTHOF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 39 MAP 2020 : Appellee : Appeal from the Order of Superior : Court at No. 3314 EDA 2018 dated : December 10, 2019 Affirming the v. : Judgment of Sentence dated : September 25, 2018 of the : Montgomery Court of Common WILLIAM HENRY COSBY JR., : Pleas, Criminal Division, at No. CP- : 46-CR-3932-2016 Appellant : : ARGUED: December 1, 2020 OPINION JUSTICE WECHT DECIDED: June 30, 2021 In 2005, Montgomery County District Attorney Bruce Castor learned that Andrea Constand had reported that William Cosby had sexually assaulted her in 2004 at his Cheltenhamresidence. Alongwith his top deputy prosecutorandexperienceddetectives, District Attorney Castor thoroughly investigated Constand’s claim. In evaluating the likelihood of a successful prosecution of Cosby, the district attorney foresaw difficulties with Constand’s credibility as a witness based, in part, upon her decision not to file a complaint promptly. D.A. Castor further determined that a prosecution would be frustrated because there was no corroboratingforensic evidence and because testimony from other potential claimants against Cosby likely was inadmissible under governing laws of evidence. The collective weight of these considerations led D.A. Castor to conclude that, unless Cosby confessed, “there was insufficient credible and admissible evidence upon which any charge against Mr. Cosby related to the Constand incident could
    [Show full text]