DOCSLIB.ORG

Resource Name (Heading 1)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Resource Name (Heading 1) Four Forest Restoration Initiative, Rim Country EIS Botany and Weeds Report Prepared by: Debra L. Crisp Coconino NF Forest Botanist and Rim Country Botany Lead for: 4FRI Rim Country EIS Date In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992. Submit your completed form or letter to USDA by: (1) mail: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C. 20250-9410; (2) fax: (202) 690-7442; or (3) email: [email protected]. USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer and lender. Title of Project, [Name of Resource] Report Table of Contents Purpose and Need ........................................................................................................................ 3 Alternatives ................................................................................................................................. 5 Alternative 1 (No Action) ........................................................................................................... 5 Alternative 2 – Modified Proposed Action ................................................................................. 6 Alternative 3 (Focused Alternative) ............................................................................................ 8 Comparison of Action Alternatives ............................................................................................ 9 Design Features, Best Management Practices, Mitigation and Conservation Measures .......... 11 Relevant Law, Regulation, and Policy ...................................................................................... 15 Forest Plan Direction ................................................................................................................ 17 Apache-Sitgreaves National Forest Plan ............................................................................... 17 Coconino National Forest Revised Forest Plan (2018) ......................................................... 23 Tonto National Forest Plan (1985) ........................................................................................ 36 Noxious or Invasive Weed NEPA Guidance ......................................................................... 41 Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences ........................................................ 41 Assumptions and Methodology ............................................................................................. 42 Indicators/Topics of Analysis ................................................................................................ 43 Southwestern Region Regional Forester’s Sensitive Plants .................................................. 43 Noxious or Invasive Weeds ................................................................................................... 84 Assumptions and Methodology ........................................................................................ 84 Affected Environment ......................................................................................................... 84 Other Agencies and Individuals Consulted ............................................................................... 93 Acronyms .................................................................................................................................. 93 Glossary .................................................................................................................................... 93 References ..................................................................................................................................... 94 Table 1. Detailed Mechanical and Fire Treatments by Alternative ................................................. 9 Table 2. Design features, best management practices, mitigation and conservation measures directly applicable to botanical resources. ........................................................................... 11 Table 3. Southwestern Region Regional Sensitive species occurring within the Project Area. .... 44 Table 4. Locations and proposed treatments for villous groundcover milkvetch. Data are from SEINet. .................................................................................................................................. 48 Table 5. Locations of Blumer’s dock on Apache-Sitgreaves and Tonto NFs (source Apache Sitgreaves files). .................................................................................................................... 64 Table 6. Collections of Blumer's dock within the analysis boundary as documented in SEINet .. 66 Table 7. Aquatic restoration areas and/or stream channel restoration containing Blumer's dock. Plant locations are from AZGFD HDMS data. ..................................................................... 66 Table 8. Stream channel restoration areas containing Blumer's dock ........................................... 67 Table 9. Bebb’s willow locations on (Apache-Sitgreaves NF) ..................................................... 69 Table 10. Bebb’s willow from SEINet. ........................................................................................ 70 Table 11. Locations of Arizona bugbane in vegetation treatment units. ...................................... 72 Table 12. Locations of Arizona Sneezeweed from Apache Sitgreaves files ................................. 77 Table 13. Arizona sneezeweed occurrences as documented in TESP/IS (Coconino National Forest) .................................................................................................................................... 77 Table 14. Locations of Arizona sneezeweed in treatment areas using data from SEINet ............. 78 Table 15. Locations of Flagstaff Beardtongue in vegetation treatments. ..................................... 80 i Title of Project, [Name of Resource] Report Table 16. Locations for Flagstaff beardtongue occurring in treatment units from Arizona Game and Fish Heritage Database ................................................................................................... 81 Table 17. Noxious or invasive weeds on Apache Sitgreaves NF and within the project area boundary ................................................................................................................................ 85 Table 18. Noxious or invasive weeds on Coconino NF and within the analysis area boundary ... 86 Table 19. Noxious or invasive weeds on Tonto NF and within the analysis area boundary ......... 88 Figure 1. Location of villous groundcover milkvetch near Bear Spring ....................................... 49 Figure 2. Google Earth image of Bear Springs area. .................................................................... 50 Figure 3. Location of villous groundcover milkvetch near Black Canyon Lake ........................... 50 Figure 4. Google Earth image of Black Canyon Lake and occurrence of villous groundcover milkvetch. .............................................................................................................................. 51 Figure 5. Dane thistle in analysis area. .......................................................................................... 53 Figure 6. Location of Mogollon fleabane in analysis area. ........................................................... 55 Figure 7. Locations of Rock fleabane in analysis area. ................................................................. 57 Figure 8. Map showing Hendricks collection location of Eastwood alumroot. ............................ 61 Figure 9. Arizona bugbane in Tom's Creek drainage, shown by blue polygon ............................. 73 Figure 10. Hairy clematis near Hoe Tank. .................................................................................... 75 ii Purpose and Need The purpose and need for the Rim Country Project is fully described in the June 2016 Scoping Document. See that document for a complete summary. The purpose of the Rim Country Project is to reestablish and restore
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Plant Press the ARIZONA NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY
    The Plant Press THE ARIZONA NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY Volume 36, Number 1 Summer 2013 In this Issue: Plants of the Madrean Archipelago 1-4 Floras in the Madrean Archipelago Conference 5-8 Abstracts of Botanical Papers Presented in the Madrean Archipelago Conference Southwest Coralbean (Erythrina flabelliformis). Plus 11-19 Conservation Priority Floras in the Madrean Archipelago Setting for Arizona G1 Conference and G2 Plant Species: A Regional Assessment by Thomas R. Van Devender1. Photos courtesy the author. & Our Regular Features Today the term ‘bioblitz’ is popular, meaning an intensive effort in a short period to document the diversity of animals and plants in an area. The first bioblitz in the southwestern 2 President’s Note United States was the 1848-1855 survey of the new boundary between the United States and Mexico after the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo of 1848 ended the Mexican-American War. 8 Who’s Who at AZNPS The border between El Paso, Texas and the Colorado River in Arizona was surveyed in 1855- 9 & 17 Book Reviews 1856, following the Gadsden Purchase in 1853. Besides surveying and marking the border with monuments, these were expeditions that made extensive animal and plant collections, 10 Spotlight on a Native often by U.S. Army physicians. Botanists John M. Bigelow (Charphochaete bigelovii), Charles Plant C. Parry (Agave parryi), Arthur C. V. Schott (Stephanomeria schotti), Edmund K. Smith (Rhamnus smithii), George Thurber (Stenocereus thurberi), and Charles Wright (Cheilanthes wrightii) made the first systematic plant collection in the Arizona-Sonora borderlands. ©2013 Arizona Native Plant In 1892-94, Edgar A. Mearns collected 30,000 animal and plant specimens on the second Society.
    [Show full text]
  • Viability Analyses for Vascular Plant Species Within Prescott National Forest, Arizona
    Viability analyses for vascular plant species within Prescott National Forest, Arizona Marc Baker Draft 4 January 2011 1 Part 1. Description of Ecological Context (Adapted from: Ecological Sustainability Report, Prescott National Forest, Prescott, Arizona, April 2009) Description of the Planning Unit Prescott National Forest (PNF) includes mostly mountains and associated grassy valleys of central Arizona that lie between the forested plateaus to the north and the arid desert region to the south. Elevations range between 3,000 feet above sea level along the lower Verde Valley to 7,979 feet at the top of Mount Union, the highest natural feature on the Forest. Roughly half of the PNF occurs west of the city of Prescott, Arizona, in the Juniper, Santa Maria, Sierra Prieta, and Bradshaw Mountains. The other half of the PNF lies east of Prescott and takes in the terrain of Mingus Mountain, the Black Hills, and Black Mesa. The rugged topography of the PNF provides important watersheds for both the Verde and Colorado Rivers. Within these watersheds are many important continuously or seasonally flowing stream courses and drainages. A portion of the Verde River has been designated as part of the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System. Vegetation within PNF is complex and diverse: Sonoran Desert, dominated by saguaro cacti and paloverde trees, occurs to the south of Bradshaw Mountains; and cool mountain forests with conifer and aspen trees occur within as few as 10 miles upslope from the desert . In between, there are a variety of plant and animal habitats including grasslands, hot steppe shrub, chaparral, pinyon-juniper woodlands, and ponderosa pine forests.
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Flora of West Clear Creek Wilderness, Coconino and Yavapai
    VASCULAR FLORA OF WEST CLEAR CREEK WILDERNESS, COCONINO AND YAVAPAI COUNTIES, ARIZONA By Wendy C. McBride A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Biology Northern Arizona University May 2016 Approved: Tina J. Ayers, Ph.D., Chair Randall W. Scott, Ph.D. Liza M. Holeski, Ph.D. ABSTRACT VASCULAR FLORA OF WEST CLEAR CREEK WILDERNESS, COCONINO AND YAVAPAI COUNTIES, ARIZONA WENDY C. MCBRIDE West Clear Creek Wilderness bisects the Mogollon Rim in Arizona, and is nested between the Colorado Plateau and Basin and Range physiographic provinces. Between 2013 and 2016, a floristic inventory vouchered 542 taxa and reviewed 428 previous collections to produce a total plant inventory of 594 taxa from 93 families and 332 genera. The most species rich families Were Asteraceae, Poaceae, Fabaceae, Brassicaceae, Rosaceae, Plantaginaceae, Cyperaceae, and Polygonaceae. Carex, Erigeron, Bromus, Muhlenbergia, and Oenothera Were the most represented genera. Nonnative taxa accounted for seven percent of the total flora. Stachys albens was vouchered as a new state record for Arizona. New county records include Graptopetalum rusbyi (Coconino), Pseudognaphalium pringlei (Coconino), Phaseolus pedicellatus var. grayanus (Coconino), and Quercus rugosa (Coconino and Yavapai). This study quantified and contrasted native species diversity in canyon versus non- canyon floras across the Southwest. Analyses based on eighteen floras indicate that those centered about a major canyon feature shoW greater diversity than non-canyon floras. Regression models revealed that presence of a canyon Was a better predictor of similarity between floras than was the distance betWeen them. This study documents the remarkable diversity found Within canyon systems and the critical, yet varied, habitat they provide in the southwestern U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Checklist of Vascular Flora, Cedar Breaks National
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Program Center Annotated Checklist of Vascular Flora Cedar Breaks National Monument Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NCPN/NRTR—2009/173 ON THE COVER Peterson’s campion (Silene petersonii), Cedar Breaks National Monument, Utah. Photograph by Walter Fertig. Annotated Checklist of Vascular Flora Cedar Breaks National Monument Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NCPN/NRTR—2009/173 Author Walter Fertig Moenave Botanical Consulting 1117 W. Grand Canyon Dr. Kanab, UT 84741 Editing and Design Alice Wondrak Biel Northern Colorado Plateau Network P.O. Box 848 Moab, UT 84532 February 2009 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Program Center Fort Collins, Colorado The Natural Resource Publication series addresses natural resource topics that are of interest and applicability to a broad readership in the National Park Service and to others in the management of natural resources, including the scientifi c community, the public, and the NPS conservation and environmental constituencies. Manuscripts are peer-reviewed to ensure that the information is scientifi cally credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and is designed and published in a professional manner. The Natural Resource Technical Report series is used to disseminate the peer-reviewed results of scientifi c studies in the physical, biological, and social sciences for both the advancement of science and the achievement of the National Park Service’s mission. The reports provide contributors with a forum for displaying comprehensive data that are often deleted from journals because of page limitations. Current examples of such reports include the results of research that addresses natural resource management issues; natural resource inventory and monitoring activities; resource assessment reports; scientifi c literature reviews; and peer- reviewed proceedings of technical workshops, conferences, or symposia.
    [Show full text]
  • Sensitive Species That Are Not Listed Or Proposed Under the ESA Sorted By: Major Group, Subgroup, NS Sci
    Forest Service Sensitive Species that are not listed or proposed under the ESA Sorted by: Major Group, Subgroup, NS Sci. Name; Legend: Page 94 REGION 10 REGION 1 REGION 2 REGION 3 REGION 4 REGION 5 REGION 6 REGION 8 REGION 9 ALTERNATE NATURESERVE PRIMARY MAJOR SUB- U.S. N U.S. 2005 NATURESERVE SCIENTIFIC NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME(S) COMMON NAME GROUP GROUP G RANK RANK ESA C 9 Anahita punctulata Southeastern Wandering Spider Invertebrate Arachnid G4 NNR 9 Apochthonius indianensis A Pseudoscorpion Invertebrate Arachnid G1G2 N1N2 9 Apochthonius paucispinosus Dry Fork Valley Cave Invertebrate Arachnid G1 N1 Pseudoscorpion 9 Erebomaster flavescens A Cave Obligate Harvestman Invertebrate Arachnid G3G4 N3N4 9 Hesperochernes mirabilis Cave Psuedoscorpion Invertebrate Arachnid G5 N5 8 Hypochilus coylei A Cave Spider Invertebrate Arachnid G3? NNR 8 Hypochilus sheari A Lampshade Spider Invertebrate Arachnid G2G3 NNR 9 Kleptochthonius griseomanus An Indiana Cave Pseudoscorpion Invertebrate Arachnid G1 N1 8 Kleptochthonius orpheus Orpheus Cave Pseudoscorpion Invertebrate Arachnid G1 N1 9 Kleptochthonius packardi A Cave Obligate Pseudoscorpion Invertebrate Arachnid G2G3 N2N3 9 Nesticus carteri A Cave Spider Invertebrate Arachnid GNR NNR 8 Nesticus cooperi Lost Nantahala Cave Spider Invertebrate Arachnid G1 N1 8 Nesticus crosbyi A Cave Spider Invertebrate Arachnid G1? NNR 8 Nesticus mimus A Cave Spider Invertebrate Arachnid G2 NNR 8 Nesticus sheari A Cave Spider Invertebrate Arachnid G2? NNR 8 Nesticus silvanus A Cave Spider Invertebrate Arachnid G2? NNR
    [Show full text]
  • Docketed 08-Afc-13C
    November 2, 2010 California Energy Commission Chris Otahal DOCKETED Wildlife Biologist 08-AFC-13C Bureau of Land Management TN # Barstow Field Office 66131 2601 Barstow Road JUL 06 2012 Barstow, CA 92311 Subject: Late Season 2010 Botanical Survey of the Calico Solar Project Site URS Project No. 27658189.70013 Dear Mr. Otahal: INTRODUCTION This letter report presents the results of the late season floristic surveys for the Calico Solar Project (Project), a proposed renewable solar energy facility located approximately 37 miles east of Barstow, California. The purpose of this study was to identify late season plant species that only respond to late summer/early fall monsoonal rains and to satisfy the California Energy Commission (CEC) Supplemental Staff Assessment BIO-12 Special-status Plant Impact Avoidance and Minimization, requirements B and C (CEC 2010). Botanical surveys were conducted for the Project site in 2007 and 2008. In response to above average rainfall events that have occurred during 2010, including a late season rainfall event on August 17, 2010 totaling 0.49 inch1, additional botanical surveys were conducted by URS Corporation (URS) for the Project site. These surveys incorporated survey protocols published by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) (BLM 1996a, BLM 1996b, BLM 2001, and BLM 2009). BLM and CEC staff were given the opportunity to comment on the survey protocol prior to the commencement of botanical surveys on the site. The 2010 late season survey was conducted from September 20 through September 24, 2010. The surveys encompassed the 1,876-acre Phase 1 portion of the Project site; select areas in the main, western area of Phase 2; a 250-foot buffer area outside the site perimeter; and a proposed transmission line, which begins at the Pisgah substation, heads northeast following the aerial transmission line, follows the Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) railroad on the north side, and ends in survey cell 24 (ID#24, Figure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Viability Analyses for Vascular Plant Species Within Prescott National Forest, Arizona
    Viability Analyses for Vascular Plant Species within Prescott National Forest, Arizona Dr. Marc Baker Compiled January 2011 with January 2014 updates for Forest Plan Revision Environmental Impact Statements Part 1. Description of Ecological Context (Adapted from: Ecological Sustainability Report, Prescott National Forest, Prescott, Arizona, April 2009) Description of the Planning Unit Prescott National Forest (PNF) includes mostly mountains and associated grassy valleys of central Arizona that lie between the forested plateaus to the north and the arid desert region to the south. Elevations range between 3,000 feet above sea level along the lower Verde Valley to 7,979 feet at the top of Mount Union, the highest natural feature on the Forest. Roughly half of the PNF occurs west of the city of Prescott, Arizona, in the Juniper, Santa Maria, Sierra Prieta, and Bradshaw Mountains. The other half of the PNF lies east of Prescott and takes in the terrain of Mingus Mountain, the Black Hills, and Black Mesa. The rugged topography of the PNF provides important watersheds for both the Verde and Colorado Rivers. Within these watersheds are many important continuously or seasonally flowing stream courses and drainages. A portion of the Verde River has been designated as part of the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System. Vegetation within PNF is complex and diverse: Sonoran Desert, dominated by saguaro cacti and paloverde trees, occurs to the south of Bradshaw Mountains; and cool mountain forests with conifer and aspen trees occur within as few as 10 miles upslope from the desert . In between, there are a variety of plant and animal habitats including grasslands, hot steppe shrub, chaparral, pinyon-juniper woodlands, and ponderosa pine forests.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    BIOLOGICAL EVALUATION OF THE NEAR WEST ANALYSIS AREA ______________________________ RESOLUTION COPPER MINING Prepared for: 102 Magma Heights P.O. Box 1944 Superior, Arizona 85173 Prepared by: 4001 E. Paradise Falls Drive Tucson, Arizona 85712 March 2013 (Revised September 2014) Project No. 807.82/807.94 Resolution Copper Mining Near West Analysis Area Biological Evaluation TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................... ES-1 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ 1 2. METHODS ........................................................................................................................................... 1 2.1. Vegetation Mapping ..................................................................................................................... 1 2.2. Screening Analysis of Special Status and Forest Sensitive Species ............................................. 2 2.3. Special Status Plant Survey Methods ........................................................................................... 3 2.4. Desert Tortoise Survey Methods .................................................................................................. 4 3. ANALYSIS AREA DESCRIPTION .................................................................................................... 4 3.1. Human Use of the Analysis Area ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Coconino National Forest
    Chapter 1: Introduction In Ecological and Biological Diversity of National Forests in Region 3 Bruce Vander Lee, Ruth Smith, and Joanna Bate The Nature Conservancy EXECUTIVE SUMMARY We summarized existing regional-scale biological and ecological assessment information from Arizona and New Mexico for use in the development of Forest Plans for the eleven National Forests in USDA Forest Service Region 3 (Region 3). Under the current Planning Rule, Forest Plans are to be strategic documents focusing on ecological, economic, and social sustainability. In addition, Region 3 has identified restoration of the functionality of fire-adapted systems as a central priority to address forest health issues. Assessments were selected for inclusion in this report based on (1) relevance to Forest Planning needs with emphasis on the need to address ecosystem diversity and ecological sustainability, (2) suitability to address restoration of Region 3’s major vegetation systems, and (3) suitability to address ecological conditions at regional scales. We identified five assessments that addressed the distribution and current condition of ecological and biological diversity within Region 3. We summarized each of these assessments to highlight important ecological resources that exist on National Forests in Arizona and New Mexico: • Extent and distribution of potential natural vegetation types in Arizona and New Mexico • Distribution and condition of low-elevation grasslands in Arizona • Distribution of stream reaches with native fish occurrences in Arizona • Species richness and conservation status attributes for all species on National Forests in Arizona and New Mexico • Identification of priority areas for biodiversity conservation from Ecoregional Assessments from Arizona and New Mexico Analyses of available assessments were completed across all management jurisdictions for Arizona and New Mexico, providing a regional context to illustrate the biological and ecological importance of National Forests in Region 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Plants
    Biodiversity Data Journal 7: e38687 doi: 10.3897/BDJ.7.e38687 Data Paper Biota from the coastal wetlands of Praia da Vitória (Terceira, Azores, Portugal): Part 4 – Vascular plants Rui B. Elias‡, Mariana R. Brito§, César M.M. Pimentel§, Elisabete C. Nogueira§, Paulo A. Borges‡ ‡ CE3C – Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes/Azorean Biodiversity Group and Universidade dos Açores - Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e do Ambiente, Angra do Heroísmo, Portugal § LIFE CWR – LIFE project “Ecological Restoration and Conservation of Praia da Vitória Coastal Wet Green Infrastructures”, Praia da Vitória, Portugal Corresponding author: Rui B. Elias ([email protected]) Academic editor: Yasen Mutafchiev Received: 31 Jul 2019 | Accepted: 13 Sep 2019 | Published: 18 Oct 2019 Citation: Elias RB, Brito MR, Pimentel CM.M, Nogueira EC, Borges PA (2019) Biota from the coastal wetlands of Praia da Vitória (Terceira, Azores, Portugal): Part 4 – Vascular plants. Biodiversity Data Journal 7: e38687. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.7.e38687 Abstract Background The data presented here come from field observations, carried out between 2014 and 2017, as part of a LIFE research project aiming to preserve and restore three coastal wetlands of Praia da Vitória (Terceira Island, Azores, Portugal) (LIFE-CWR). A total of 23 vascular plant species surveys were carried out in three sites: one for each semester in Paul da Praia da Vitória (PPV) and Paul da Pedreira do Cabo da Praia (PPCP); one for each semester (except in 2014) in Paul do Belo Jardim (PBJ). The main objectives were to determine the plant richness of the three sites and to monitor yearly variation on species composition.
    [Show full text]
  • Classification of Subtribe Conyzinae (Asteraceae:Astereae)
    8 LUNDELLIA DECEMBER, 2008 CLASSIFICATION OF SUBTRIBE CONYZINAE (ASTERACEAE:ASTEREAE) Guy L. Nesom 2925 Hartwood Drive, Fort Worth, Texas 76109, USA Abstract: Subtribe Conyzinae includes Erigeron, New World Conyza, the North American genus Aphanostephus, and a small group of South American species segregated as the genera Apopyros, Darwiniothamnus, Hysterionica, Leptostelma, and Neja. Erigeron is the only genus with species native to regions outside of the New World. About 500 species are included in the subtribe. All North American, Central American, and South American species of Erigeron are included in the present treatment and assigned to one of the 35 sections recognized here. Ten new sections of Erigeron are recognized: sect. Disparipili, sect. Filifolii, sect. Gyrifolium, sect. Lonchophylli, sect. Meridionales, sect Microcephalum, sect. Quercifolium, sect. Radicati, sect. Rhizo- nexus, and sect. Terranea. Conyza is at least biphyletic; each of the groups is represented in the treatment but not all of the South American species are included. Molecular data have made it clear that traditional, North American species of Erigeron form the basal and terminal clades in the evolutionary topology of the subtribe, thus Conyza, Aphanostephus, and the other segregate genera have arisen from within the branches of Erigeron. Erigeron, as currently treated and tentatively maintained here, is paraphyletic. Broad taxonomic alternatives that include only monophyletic taxa are: (1) to treat the whole subtribe as Erigeron or, (2) to recognize Aphanostephus or Aphanostephus, Conyza, and the other South American segregates and at least an additional 5 to 10 new generic-level segregates from species groups traditionally treated as North American Erigeron. Keywords: Compositae, Conyza, Erigeron.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Treatment of Noxious Or Invasive Plants on the Tonto NF Iii
    Environmental United States Assessment for Department of Agriculture Forest Integrated Treatment of Service Southwestern Noxious or Invasive Region Plants Tonto National Forest Gila, Maricopa, Pinal, and Yavapai Counties, Arizona For Information Contact: Patti Fenner, Noxious Weed Program Manager Tonto National Forest Supervisor’s Office, 2324 E. McDowell Road, Phoenix, AZ 85006 602-225-5200 www.fs.fed.us/r3/tonto/ The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because of all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, DC. 20250-9410, or call (800) 79503272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Printed on recycled paper – August 2012 Content Summary ................................................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 1 – Purpose and Need
    [Show full text]