Guided Extension of Reading Skills Through Literature
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Epic of Gilgamesh Humbaba from His Days Running Wild in the Forest
Gilgamesh's superiority. They hugged and became best friends. Name Always eager to build a name for himself, Gilgamesh wanted to have an adventure. He wanted to go to the Cedar Forest and slay its guardian demon, Humbaba. Enkidu did not like the idea. He knew The Epic of Gilgamesh Humbaba from his days running wild in the forest. He tried to talk his best friend out of it. But Gilgamesh refused to listen. Reluctantly, By Vickie Chao Enkidu agreed to go with him. A long, long time ago, there After several days of journeying, Gilgamesh and Enkidu at last was a kingdom called Uruk. reached the edge of the Cedar Forest. Their intrusion made Humbaba Its ruler was Gilgamesh. very angry. But thankfully, with the help of the sun god, Shamash, the duo prevailed. They killed Humbaba and cut down the forest. They Gilgamesh, by all accounts, fashioned a raft out of the cedar trees. Together, they set sail along the was not an ordinary person. Euphrates River and made their way back to Uruk. The only shadow He was actually a cast over this victory was Humbaba's curse. Before he was beheaded, superhuman, two-thirds god he shouted, "Of you two, may Enkidu not live the longer, may Enkidu and one-third human. As king, not find any peace in this world!" Gilgamesh was very harsh. His people were scared of him and grew wary over time. They pleaded with the sky god, Anu, for his help. In When Gilgamesh and Enkidu arrived at Uruk, they received a hero's response, Anu asked the goddess Aruru to create a beast-like man welcome. -
From Small States to Universalism in the Pre-Islamic Near East
REVOLUTIONIZING REVOLUTIONIZING Mark Altaweel and Andrea Squitieri and Andrea Mark Altaweel From Small States to Universalism in the Pre-Islamic Near East This book investigates the long-term continuity of large-scale states and empires, and its effect on the Near East’s social fabric, including the fundamental changes that occurred to major social institutions. Its geographical coverage spans, from east to west, modern- day Libya and Egypt to Central Asia, and from north to south, Anatolia to southern Arabia, incorporating modern-day Oman and Yemen. Its temporal coverage spans from the late eighth century BCE to the seventh century CE during the rise of Islam and collapse of the Sasanian Empire. The authors argue that the persistence of large states and empires starting in the eighth/ seventh centuries BCE, which continued for many centuries, led to new socio-political structures and institutions emerging in the Near East. The primary processes that enabled this emergence were large-scale and long-distance movements, or population migrations. These patterns of social developments are analysed under different aspects: settlement patterns, urban structure, material culture, trade, governance, language spread and religion, all pointing at population movement as the main catalyst for social change. This book’s argument Mark Altaweel is framed within a larger theoretical framework termed as ‘universalism’, a theory that explains WORLD A many of the social transformations that happened to societies in the Near East, starting from Andrea Squitieri the Neo-Assyrian period and continuing for centuries. Among other infl uences, the effects of these transformations are today manifested in modern languages, concepts of government, universal religions and monetized and globalized economies. -
D I V I N a T I O N Culture a N D the H a N D L I N G of The
Originalveröffentlichung in: G. Leick (Hrsg), The Babylonian World, New York/London, 2007, S. 361-372 CHAPTER TWENTY-FIVE DIVINATION CULTURE AND THE HANDLING OF THE FUTURE Stefan M. Maul n omen is a clearly defined perception understood as a sign pointing to future A events whenever it manifests itself under identical circumstances. The classification of a perception as ominous is based on an epistemological development which establishes a normative relationship between the perceived and the future. This classification process is preceded by a period of detailed examination and is thus initially built on empirical knowledge. Omina only cease to be detected empirically when a firm conceptual link has been established between the observed and the future which then allows omina to be construed by the application of regularities. In the Mesopotamian written sources from the first and second millennia BC, omina based on regularities far exceed those based on empirical data. Mesopotamian scholars generally collected data without formally expressing the fundamental principles behind their method. It was the composition of non-empirical omina as such which allowed students to detect the regularities on which they were based without this formulated orally or in writing. Modern attempts at a systematic investigation of such principles however, are still outstanding. It is interesting that there is no Sumerian or Akkadian equivalent for the terms 'oracle' or 'omen'. Assyriologists use the term omen for the sentence construction 'if x then y' which consists of a main clause beginning with summa ('if') describing the ominous occurence, and a second clause which spells out the predicted outcome. -
Mississippi Standards and Guidelines for Archaeological Investigations
Part 3 Chapter 12: Mississippi Standards and Guidelines for Archaeological Investigations Rule 12.1. Introduction to the Standards Mississippi history dates back to over 12,000 years ago. The vast majority of that history is unwritten and becomes known only through the archaeological record. Most often, archaeological investigations in Mississippi occur in response to federal and state laws that protect archaeological resources. The Mississippi Department of Archives and History, serving as the Mississippi State Historic Preservation Office (MSSHPO), developed these Standards to provide a framework for those activities, as well as guidance for non-regulatory archaeological studies. In accordance with MS Code § 39-7- 21 (2013), the Board of Trustees adopted the following standards to guide archaeological excavations in Mississippi. These Standards replace the “Guidelines for Archaeological Investigations and Reports in Mississippi” established in 2001, and as amended in 2012. Since that date, there have been many technological advances, advances in archaeological method and theory, and reevaluation of archaeological practices and procedures in Mississippi. These Standards will reflect those. The Standards reflect various goals for Mississippi archaeology: 1. Ensure that archaeological studies meet high professional research standards. 2. Identify important archaeological sites that contribute to our understanding of Mississippi’s pre-contact and post-contact history. 3. Protect important archaeological sites, or when appropriate, gain information. 4. Provide significant public benefits. 5. Develop sound and reasoned public policy on regulatory archaeology. 6. Keep archaeological studies as cost effective as possible. 7. Increase creativity and flexibility in the conduct of archaeological studies. Archaeology in Mississippi must result in significant public benefit. -
Library Basics -. | Óbudai Egyetem Könyvtára
Emilia Kosa Using the Library – Library basics /KVT-EN-01/ 2018 EFOP-3.4.3-16-2016-00023 Az Óbudai Egyetem komplex intézményi fejlesztései a felsőfokú oktatás minőségének és hozzáférhetőségének együttes javítása érdekében Contents 1. History of Libraries ...................................................................................................................4 1.1 Prehistoric age and the Ancient world ................................................................................................................ 4 1.1.1 Cave paintings .................................................................................................................4 1.1.2 First written memories .....................................................................................................4 1.2 Middle Ages and Renaissance ................................................................................................................................. 7 1.2.1 Middle Ages ....................................................................................................................7 1.2.2 Renaissance .....................................................................................................................7 1.3 From Baroque until 20th century ........................................................................................................................... 8 1.3.1 Baroque and Enlightenment ............................................................................................8 1.3.2 From the 19th century ......................................................................................................8 -
Textual and Visual Discourse in Ashurbanipal's North Palace
Zurich Open Repository and Archive University of Zurich Main Library Strickhofstrasse 39 CH-8057 Zurich www.zora.uzh.ch Year: 2016 Representations of Royal Power: Textual and Visual Discourse in Ashurbanipal’s North Palace Cojocaru, Gabriela Augustina Posted at the Zurich Open Repository and Archive, University of Zurich ZORA URL: https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-135476 Dissertation Originally published at: Cojocaru, Gabriela Augustina. Representations of Royal Power: Textual and Visual Discourse in Ashur- banipal’s North Palace. 2016, University of Zurich / University of Bucharest, Faculty of Theology. University of Bucharest, Faculty of History History Doctoral School PhD Thesis in Ancient History and Archaeology Gabriela Augustina Cojocaru Representations of Royal Power: Textual and Visual Discourse in Ashurbanipal’s North Palace Advisor: Prof. Dr. Gheorghe Vlad Nistor Referents: Prof. Dr. Christoph Uehlinger (University of Zurich) Prof. Dr. Miron Ciho (University of Bucharest) Prof. Dr. Lucretiu Birliba (Al. I. Cuza University of Iasi) President of the committee: Prof. Dr. Antal Lukacs (University of Bucharest) Bucharest 2015 Contents List of Abbreviations .............................................................................................................................. ii List of Figures ........................................................................................................................................ iii List of Plates ......................................................................................................................................... -
World Archaeology (On Transhumance Alui Pastoralism) 15
Durham Research Online Deposited in DRO: 17 January 2011 Version of attached le: Published Version Peer-review status of attached le: Peer-reviewed Citation for published item: D¡azAndreu,Margarita (2010) 'Grahame Clark and Spain.', in Grahame Clark and his legacy. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 205-240. Further information on publisher's website: http://www.c-s-p.org/yers/Grahame-Clark-and-His-Legacy1-4438-2222-1.htm Publisher's copyright statement: Published with permission of Cambridge Scholars Publishing. Additional information: Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full DRO policy for further details. Durham University Library, Stockton Road, Durham DH1 3LY, United Kingdom Tel : +44 (0)191 334 3042 | Fax : +44 (0)191 334 2971 https://dro.dur.ac.uk GRAHAME CLARK AND SPAIN MARGARITA DfAZ-ANDREU Abstract This article explores how Grahame Clark's archaeology was received in Spain on the basis of the correspondence sent to three of the most important archaeologists of Francoist Spain (1936/39-1975). Julio Martinez Santa-Olalla (1905-1972). Luis Pericot Garcia (1899-1978) and Martin Almagro Basch (1911-1984). -
Paper Abstracts
PAPER ABSTRACTS Plenary Address Eric H. Cline (The George Washington University), “Dirt, Digging, Dreams, and Drama: Why Presenting Proper Archaeology to the Public is Crucial for the Future of Our Field” We seem to have forgotten that previous generations of Near Eastern archaeologists knew full well the need to bring their work before the eyes of the general public; think especially of V. Gordon Childe, Sir Leonard Woolley, Gertrude Bell, James Henry Breasted, Yigael Yadin, Dame Kathleen Kenyon, and a whole host of others who lectured widely and wrote prolifically. Breasted even created a movie on the exploits of the Oriental Institute, which debuted at Carnegie Hall and then played around the country in the 1930s. The public was hungry for accurate information back then and is still hungry for it today. And yet, with a few exceptions, we have lost sight of this, sacrificed to the goal of achieving tenure and other perceived institutional norms, and have left it to others to tell our stories for us, not always to our satisfaction. I believe that it is time for us all— not just a few, but as many as possible—to once again begin telling our own stories about our findings and presenting our archaeological work in ways that make it relevant, interesting, and engaging to a broader audience. We need to deliver our findings and our thoughts about the ancient world in a way that will not only attract but excite our audiences. Our livelihoods, and the future of the field, depend upon it, for this is true not only for our lectures and writings for the general public but also in our classrooms. -
The Annals of Sennacherib Known Singularly As the Sennacherib
The Annals of Sennacherib Known singularly as the Sennacherib prism or by its contents as the Annals of Sennacherib, three nearly identical inscribed hexagonal clay prisms share the same account of Sennacherib king of Assyria’s eight military campaigns: the Taylor Prism (British Museum), Oriental Institute Prism (Oriental Institute of Chicago) and Jerusalem Prism (Israel Museum in Jerusalem). Son of king Sargon II, Sennacherib (Akkadian: Sin-akhkheeriba, reign: 705 – 681 B.C.) received an Assyrian empire that extended westward to include Babylonia, to the border of Egypt and part of Asia Minor. Beset by the influences of rising chieftains, Sennacherib spent much of his time reasserting control over his vassal states Babylon and Judah. Besides his military success, Sennacherib would be known for his building construction of his capital city Nineveh. Taylor Prism Oriental Institute Prism Jerusalem Prism Height 38.1 cm (15 in) 38 cm (15 in) 31 cm (12.25 in) Width (max) 16.51 cm (6.5 in) 14 cm (5.5 in) 17 cm (6.75 in) Width (min) 8.57 cm (3.5 in) Recovery Location Tell Nab ī Y ūnus (modern Tell Kouyunjik (modern day Ancient Nineveh (modern day Mosul Iraq) Mosul Iraq) day: Mosul Iraq) Made approximately around 690 B.C., all six sides of the hexagonal prism were inscribed with Assyrian cuneiform totaling some 500 lines. Significant to the Bible is Sennacherib’s third military campaign (701 B.C.) in which the Assyrian army, while suppressing Judah, besieges king Hezekiah in Jerusalem. In response to Hezekiah’s rebellion (2 Ki 18:7), Sennacherib seizes Judah by destroying its cities and deporting its surviving Jews. -
Master's in Heritage Management Department of Anthropology, CAS
Proposal for the Master of Arts in Heritage Management September 2013 Proposal for a New Degree Program: Master’s in Heritage Management Department of Anthropology, CAS University of Hawai`i at Hilo DRAFT- Not to be cited or distributed without permission 1 Proposal for the Master of Arts in Heritage Management Contents 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................ 5 2. BACKGROUND .............................................................................................................. 6 3. PROGRAM NEED AND JUSTIFICATION .................................................................... 7 4 PROGRAM OBJECTIVES .............................................................................................. 9 4.1 General Overview ............................................................................................................................................................... 9 4.2 Program learning objectives ........................................................................................................................................... 10 5. HERITAGE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM DESCRIPTION ........................................ 11 5.1 Admission Requirements ................................................................................................................................................. 11 5.2 Minimum Credits .............................................................................................................................................................. -
Honor of Biblical Archaeology Assignments Guide
Honor of Biblical Archaeology Assignments Guide **Google and Wikipedia are good websites to make all of these assignments** Assignment 7 Report on 20 important archaeological events by: (Pick 1 out of 4 option) a. Writing a two‐page research report b. Illustrating a detailed timeline c. Creating a PowerPoint presentation d. Talking to your director about the details of each of the 20 events (around 3 minutes each one) This is a good option !! Recommended Options: 1. The Discovery of Tutankhamen’s Tomb, Egypt 2. Translation of the Rosetta Stone, North Egypt 3. Ebla Tablets, Egypt 4. Machu Picchu, Peru 5. Sutton Hoo, England 6. The tomb of the First Emperor, China 7. Akrotiri, Greece 8. Pompeii and Herculaneum, Italy 9. Nazca Lines, Peru 10. Great Sphinx of Giza, Egypt 11. The Discovery of the Minoan Civilization, Greece 12. The Discovery of the Olmec Civilization, Mexico 13. The Royal Tombs of Ur, Iraq 14. Lascaux, France 15. Aztec sun stone 16. Masada, Israel 17. Altun Ha, Belize 18. Nefertiti Bust, Egypt 19. Code of Hammurabi, Iran 20. Library of Ashurbanipal, Iran Assignment 8 Share with a group or instructor the significance of each of these famous archaeologists: (3 minutes each) Have your notes on hand at the time of your report. a) Jean‐Francois Champollion b) Edward Robinson e) William Foxwell Albright Assignment 9 Assemble a folder with ten archaeological discoveries that have connected with the biblical history of the Old and New Testament (3 discoveries per page or one paragraph of each one of them) Handed over printed or by mail to your club director. -
Title No Page Number Page
THE TREATMENT OF OTHERS IN THE RAMAYANA—A POSTCOLONIAL READING by Sivamalar Sotheeswaran (nee Thirugnanasambandar) A thesis submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Copyright © 2010 Sivamalar Sotheeswaran (nee Thirugnanasambandar) School of Language, Arts and Media Faculty of Arts and Law The University of the South Pacific, Fiji April, 2010 DEDICATION This dissertation is dedicated to all those in Fiji who, on learning that I am a Sri Lankan, asked, with eager expectations of a positive answer, “Do you have Ravan’s palace over there?” This dissertation is an attempt, by a Sri Lankan Tamil Hindu to answer that question. I believe that the epic hero/anti-hero Ravan was modelled on a real petty Dravidian chieftain, who has now been demonized, mythicized and immortalized. I believe that Ravan’s palace may have been situated on Thiru- konamalai (sacred angular rock/mountain) now known by various names such as Koneswaram, Thirukkoneswaram, Thirikunaamale and Trincomalee. This rock is an ideal citadel for a chieftain’s palace/fort because it commands a strategic view of one of the best natural harbours in the world. The site fits the description in Valmiki. There may be numerous other sites in Sri Lanka that Valmiki may have had in mind when he compiled his epic. It is even likely that the site existed only in the poet’s imagination. Today, there is, on this rock, a temple complex dedicated to Lord Shiva. The presiding deity is Thirukkoneswaran. (Recent legend has it that the idol was rescued from the sea where it had been flung by Portuguese invaders.) The waters of the Indian Ocean splashing against the cliffs of Koneswaram provide constant music for the Lord.