DOCSLIB.ORG

Introduction: Retrospective Virtual Issue

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Introduction: Retrospective Virtual Issue Introduction: Retrospective Virtual Issue INTRODUCTION Lori Gruen and Alison Wylie The impetus for founding Hypatia dates back almost forty years; the journal took shape as a collective project, first envisioned as possibility – indeed, an urgently felt necesssity– in early meetings of the Society for Women and Philosophy (the first of these was in 1970). A mandate for the journal was drafted in the mid-1970s, and a founding editorial board established in 1977; the journal was named Hypatia at a meeting of its new Editorial Board and Azizah al-Hibri was appointed its founding editor in 1980. Three years later, the first issue of Hypatia appeared; it was a special issue of Women’s Studies International Forum, which hosted three such issues (1983-1985). And in 1986, Hypatia began publication as an autonomous journal under the editorship of Margaret Simons. So the 25th Anniversary we mark this year – with the publication in Volume 25 – is really a celebration of close to thirty years of continuous publication of feminist philosophy by Hypatia, and a recognition of the extraordinary vision and commitment of those who, in the mid-1970s, resolved to establish a venue in which feminist scholarship could flourish within philosophy. It has been inspiring and humbling to learn just what it took to create and to sustain Hypatia over these years. The introduction to the Special Issue provides a detailed account of what we learned, and you’ll find some fascinating background that doesn’t appear anywhere in print in the conference podcasts and videos posted online (URL below). The virtual issue that we introduce here honors the creative, intellectual accomplishments of all the contributors who have made Hypatia the journal it is today and who have, in the process, established feminist philosophy as a vibrant field. The sixteen papers that make up this issue were nominated for special recognition. Over the last year we circulated a call asking Hypatia readers which articles had been especially generative for their own work, and formative for feminist philosophy. We received an enormously rich set of nominations, and selected those that were most frequently nominated. Most of these articles also figured prominently in submissions to the 25th Anniversary conference and Special issue, and a quick check of the JSTOR download reports for Hypatia and of Google Scholar citations show that they have a robust readership; as those who nominated them made clear, these are articles that capture especially well the thinking on pivotal issues, at key junctures, in the development of feminist philosophy as a field. Page 1 of 6 In addition to these sixteen articles, two articles that appeared in the initial three Hypatia special issues of WSIF were nominated multiple times with particularly warm appreciation. We cannot include these here, but we want to recognize them as emblematic of the strikingly original work that made it possible to establish Hypatia as an autonomous journal. The nomination for the first of these captures the significance of both – as “galvanizing internal critique authority and sameness in feminist theory.” Maria Lugones and Elizabeth Spelman, "Have we got a theory for you: Feminist theory, cultural imperialism, and the demand for 'the women's voice'" Hypatia: A Special Issue of Women's Studies International Forum 6 (1983): 573-81. Iris Marion Young, "Humanism, gynocentrism and feminist politics" Hypatia: A Special Issue of Women’s Studies International Forum 8 (1985): 173–83. We present the articles that make up this Virtual Retrospective in chronological order. As much as there is to say about each of these articles we make no attempt to contextualize them; we feel that they speak for themselves and that their nominators say more eloquently than we could what they stand for. So by way of introduction, we offer a précis of the nomination statements we received for each of these articles. María Lugones, “Playfulness, ‘World’-travelling, and Loving Perception" 2.2 (1987): 3-19. - This article was nominated and cited more frequently than any other, and appears on every list we saw of “most influential publications in feminist philosophy.” Here is a sample of statements made by those who nominated it for this Retrospective Virtual Issue. - A brilliant paper that I keep coming back to again and again; personally challenging and philosophically rich. - Central to developing the method of intersectional analysis. - Such a great teaching piece; it brings Anzaluda's metaphysics of identity to a philosophical audience and helps us to challenge essentialism from a mestiza perspective. Helen E. Longino, "Can There Be a Feminist Science?" 2.3 (1987): 51-64. - A pivotal paper in the science and values debate. - I refer back to this work both in teaching and in my own scholarship. Although it evokes a particular time in the development of feminist philosophy, it also has a perspective that remains important and contested. - Although Longino focuses here on a specific question about feminist research practice, in this short piece and in her Signs article with Ruth Doell (from a few years earlier), she anticipates virtually all the issues that have been central to feminist philosophy of science. Repays close reading every time! Uma Narayan “Working Together Across Difference: Some Considerations on Emotions and Political Practice” 3.2 (1988): 31-48. Two papers by Uma Narayan were nominated for this Virtual Issue; her “Critique of Cultural Essentialism” (1998) and, slightly more frequently, this one. Here are statements about the significance of each of them. - The concept of “epistemic humility” is hugely important – nothing captures so poignantly and Page 2 of 6 with such subtlety the complex interplay of insight and marginality. The great gift of this paper is that its philosophical insight is matched by its grounded, practicality. This is philosophy that matters; philosophy not on holiday; philosophy engaged in the best possible sense. - Narayan analyzes the strongest version of cultural relativism as a healthy alternative to essentialist conceptions of “Other” cultures, and her hesitations enhance the conceptual framing of this pedagogic experiment. She points out that belief in universal sameness (essentialism) and difference (relativism) have both been deployed for imperialist aims and are both threats to feminism. She advocates, instead, that we look to contextualized histories of colonial interactions to determine how and why Othering binary systems have been developed and perpetuated. Susan Wendell, "Toward A Feminist Theory of Disability" 4.2 (1989): 104-124. - Simply groundbreaking!! - This discussion of disability as social constructed was absolutely transformative for me; sadly, although there’s lots more in the literature now than when Wendell so poignantly said ‘we need a theory of disability’, the attitudes and the issues she describes are still with us. Most important is her clear declaration that we need multiple theories of disability, theories from diverse standpoints, theories that expand our collective horizons so we can imagine multiple ways of living – ill and happy, ill and productive. Val Plumwood, "Nature, Self, and Gender: Feminism, Environmental Philosophy and the Critique of Rationalism” 6.1 (1991): 3-27. - I read this article as a graduate student in environmental philosophy with strong-yet- undeveloped interests in ecofeminism. It literally gave me that "aha!" moment that inspired me to see the connections between feminist critiques of the atomistic, paradigmatically male, rights- holding individual that dominates political philosophy and the law, and the vision of ecofeminists who seek more inclusive, non-dualistic modes of ethico-political representation for the non-human. Val Plumwood showed, in an original and brilliant way, that critiques of instrumental rationality – the harms it does not just to women but to indigenous peoples and the more-than-human world – require an interrogation of how feminist concerns are also ecological ones. “Nature, Self, and Gender” is still, for me, the most powerful explication of why we need an ethics, drawn from feminism, that is non-dualistic, that embraces difference, centers on care, compassion, and contextuality. It is as pertinent today as when it first appeared. Phyllis Rooney, “Gendered Reason: Sex Metaphor and Conceptions of Reason” 6.2 (1991): 77–103. - This article shows how metaphors work a two-way street: it's not just that the representation of reason as masculine damages women, but that the attempt to model reason as a type of specifically masculine virtue distorts our conception of reason. It's been very important in my reflections on how gender symbolism distorts our thought. Jacquelyn N. Zita, “Male Lesbians and the Postmodernist Body” 7.4 (1992): 106-127. Be sure to view the podcast (posted online) for the opening keynote panel of the 25th Anniversary conference, “A Journal of Her Own: Hypatia Founders and Editors” when you read this article! There’s an absolutely riveting (and hilarious) account of the fallout, for the then editors of Hypatia, when Rush Limbaugh made “Male Lesbians” the target of his vitriolic attention. Page 3 of 6 - An enormously creative essay within the fairly slim feminist philosophical literature related to sexual orientation. Sue Campbell, “Being Dismissed: The Politics of Emotional Expression” 9.3 (1994): 46-65. - Simply put, this article changed my life. As a philosopher it brought me into feminist analysis, and has been a vital element of my theoretical endeavors ever since. In my personal life, it gave me the courage to validate my feelings with the help of supportive communities. I now had justification for many of my emotions and the careful analysis of social inequities gave me a framework for communicating them. The article not only deeply inspired me but continues to inspire students when I teach it. Ann Ferguson, “Twenty Years of Feminist Philosophy” 9.3 (1994): 197-215. - This piece is not widely known but it is a trenchant assessment of both the accomplishments of feminist philosophers and the risks of “mainstreaming” at a point when feminist scholarship was rapidly becoming professionalized.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Women in Philosophy: Problems with the Discrimination Hypothesis
    Log In WOMEN IN PHILOSOPHY: PROBLEMS WITH THE DISCRIMINATION HYPOTHESIS Dec 10, 2014 | Neven Sesardic, Rafael De Clercq Your Email Address Neven Sesardic is professor of philosophy at Lingnan University, Tuen Mun, NT, Hong Kong; [email protected]. He is the author of Making Sense of Heritability (Cambridge University Press, 2005). Rafael De Clercq is associate professor and head of the Department of Visual Studies, and adjunct associate professor of philosophy, Lingnan University, Tuen Mun, NT, Hong Kong; [email protected]. The authors thank these individuals for useful comments on earlier drafts: Tomislav Bracanović, Stephen J. Ceci, Andrew Irvine, Paisley Livingston, Darrell Rowbottom, Nosson ben Ruvein, David N. Stamos, Matej Sušnik, Omri Tal, Daniel Wikler, Wendy M. Williams, and Jiji Zhang. None of these people, however, should be assumed to agree with the main claims of this paper. Editor’s Note: This is the complete version of an article with the same title adapted for the Winter 2014 Academic Questions (vol. 27, no. 4) A number of philosophers attribute the underrepresentation of women in philosophy largely to bias against women or some kind of wrongful discrimination. They cite six sources of evidence to support their contention: (1) gender disparities that increase along the path from undergraduate student to full-time faculty member; (2) anecdotal accounts of discrimination in philosophy; (3) research on gender bias in the evaluation of manuscripts, grants, and curricula vitae in other academic disciplines; (4) psychological research on implicit bias; (5) psychological research on stereotype threat; and (6) the relatively small number of articles written from a feminist perspective in leading philosophy journals.
    [Show full text]
  • The Eye of the Crocodile
    The Eye of the Crocodile The Eye of the Crocodile Val Plumwood Edited by Lorraine Shannon Published by ANU E Press The Australian National University Canberra ACT 0200, Australia Email: [email protected] This title is also available online at http://epress.anu.edu.au National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Author: Plumwood, Val. Title: The Eye of the crocodile / Val Plumwood ; edited by Lorraine Shannon. ISBN: 9781922144164 (pbk.) 9781922144171 (ebook) Notes Includes bibliographical references and index. Subjects: Predation (Biology) Philosophy of nature. Other Authors/Contributors: Shannon, Lorraine. Dewey Number: 591.53 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Cover design and layout by ANU E Press Cover image supplied by Mary Montague of Montague Leong Designs Pty Ltd. http://www.montagueleong.com.au Printed by Griffin Press This edition © 2012 ANU E Press Contents Acknowledgements . vii Preface . ix Introduction . 1 Freya Mathews, Kate Rigby, Deborah Rose First section 1 . Meeting the predator . 9 2 . Dry season (Yegge) in the stone country . 23 3 . The wisdom of the balanced rock: The parallel universe and the prey perspective . 35 Second section 4 . A wombat wake: In memoriam Birubi . 49 5 . ‘Babe’: The tale of the speaking meat . 55 Third section 6 . Animals and ecology: Towards a better integration . 77 7 . Tasteless: Towards a food-based approach to death . 91 Works cited . 97 v Acknowledgements The editor wishes to thank the following for permission to use previously published material: A version of Chapter One was published as ‘Being Prey’ in Terra Nova, Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Feminism and the Mastery of Nature
    Feminism and the Mastery of Nature Feminism and the Mastery of Nature draws on the feminist critique of reason to argue that the master form of rationality of western culture has been systematically unable to acknowledge dependency on nature, the sphere of those it has defined as ‘inferior’ others. Because its knowledge of the world is sytematically distorted by the elite domination which has shaped it, the master rationality has developed ‘blind spots’ which may threaten our survival. The future depends increasingly on our ability to create a truly democratic and ecological culture beyond dualism. The book shows how the feminist critique of dominant forms of rationality can be extended to integrate theories of gender, race and class oppression with that of the domination of nature. Val Plumwood illuminates the relationship between women and nature, and between ecological feminism and other feminist theories. Exploring the contribution feminist theory can make to radical green thought and to the development of a better environmental philosophy, Feminism and the Mastery of Nature challenges much existing work in green theory and environmental philosophy, and engages with the heavily masculine presence which has inhabited many accounts of the area. It will be essential reading for those working in these areas, and for all those seeking to understand the historical, philosophical and cultural roots of the environmental crisis and the culture of denial which blocks response to it. Val Plumwood teaches in the Department of Philosophy at the University of Tasmania, Australia. Feminism for Today General Editor: Teresa Brennan. The Regime of the Brother After the Patriarchy Juliet Flower MacCannell History After Lacan Teresa Brennan Feminism and the Mastery of Nature Val Plumwood London and New York First published 1993 by Routledge 11 New Fetter Lane, London EC4P 4EE This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2003.
    [Show full text]
  • Feminism and the Mastery of Nature/Val Plumwood
    Feminism and the Mastery of Nature Feminism and the Mastery of Nature draws on the feminist critique of reason to argue that the master form of rationality of western culture has been systematically unable to acknowledge dependency on nature, the sphere of those it has defined as ‘inferior’ others. Because its knowledge of the world is sytematically distorted by the elite domination which has shaped it, the master rationality has developed ‘blind spots’ which may threaten our survival. The future depends increasingly on our ability to create a truly democratic and ecological culture beyond dualism. The book shows how the feminist critique of dominant forms of rationality can be extended to integrate theories of gender, race and class oppression with that of the domination of nature. Val Plumwood illuminates the relationship between women and nature, and between ecological feminism and other feminist theories. Exploring the contribution feminist theory can make to radical green thought and to the development of a better environmental philosophy, Feminism and the Mastery of Nature challenges much existing work in green theory and environmental philosophy, and engages with the heavily masculine presence which has inhabited many accounts of the area. It will be essential reading for those working in these areas, and for all those seeking to understand the historical, philosophical and cultural roots of the environmental crisis and the culture of denial which blocks response to it. Val Plumwood teaches in the Department of Philosophy at the University of Tasmania, Australia. Feminism for Today General Editor: Teresa Brennan. The Regime of the Brother After the Patriarchy Juliet Flower MacCannell History After Lacan Teresa Brennan Feminism and the Mastery of Nature Val Plumwood London and New York First published 1993 by Routledge 11 New Fetter Lane, London EC4P 4EE This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2003.
    [Show full text]
  • Anthropocentrism and Androcentrism – an Ecofeminist Connection
    Södertörns högskola | Institutionen för Kultur och Kommunikation D-uppsats 15 hp | Filosofi | Höstterminen 2009 Anthropocentrism and Androcentrism – An Ecofeminist Connection Av: Daniel Pérez Marina Handledare: Hans Ruin CONTENTS Introduction 1 Karen Warren’s Ecofeminism 3 What is Ecofeminism? 3 Warren on anthropocentrism and androcentrism 13 Anthropocentrism 15 Human bias 15 Human chauvinism 16 Anthropocentrism / Human-centrism / Human-centeredness 17 Androcentrism 29 Male bias 29 Male chauvinism 31 Androcentrism / Male-centrism / Male-centeredness 32 Androcentrism, Anthropocentrism, and Warren 45 Bibliography 52 INTRODUCTION The starting point of this paper is an ecofeminist claim, namely anthropocentrism has been androcentric. My purpose will be to discuss and explain this statement. Ecofeminism, anthropocentrism, and androcentrism will therefore be the central themes. In the first chapter I shall introduce ecofeminism. It will be Karen J. Warren’s version of it that I shall describe. Karen Warren (b. 1947) has significantly contributed to the development of the philosophical aspects of ecofeminism as well as to the establishment of ecofeminist philosophy as a scholarly field. She writes about ecofeminism in the West, and to the question ‘what is ecofeminism?’ she responds that it is the perspective that, despite differences and disagreements, asserts and presupposes that: (1) There exists a system of oppression that enforces the domination of nature. (2) There exists a system of oppression that enforces the domination of women. (3)
    [Show full text]
  • Do We Need a Sex/Gender Distinction?
    Do We Need a Sex/Gender Distinction? Val Plumwood We live an embodied life; we live with those genital and is possible to change gender, of 'degendering' or 'regendering', reproductive organs and capacities, those hormones and if it is possible to change it, and of what sorts of political chromosomes, that locate us physiologically as male or strategies for feminism are viable. At issue too is the question of female .... We cannot know what children would make of difference, of whether the distinction presupposes an underlying their bodies in a nongender or non sexually organized neutral subject, and/or a norm of male experience and subjectiv­ world, what kind of sexual structuration or gender identi­ ity. ties would develop. But it is not obvious that there would In what follows, I examine some of the arguments against the be major significance to biological sex differences, to distinction, look at some of the consequences of eliminating it, gender difference, or to different sexualities. There might and survey some of the surrounding issues. I mount a limited be a multiplicity of sexual organizations, identities, and defence of the distinction - limited, because I do not want to practices, and perhaps even of genders themselves. Bod­ defend all uses of it, some of which are rightly criticised. But I do ies would be bodies (I don't think we want to deny people suggest that it still has a point,· and that some of the arguments their bodily experience). But particular bodily attributes against it miss their mark badly or apply only to some ways of would not necessarily be so determining of who we are, construing it.
    [Show full text]
  • Val Plumwood's Philosophical Animism
    Environmental Humanities Environmental Humanities, vol. 3, 2013, pp. 93-109 www.environmentalhumanities.org ISSN: 2201-1919 Val Plumwood’s Philosophical Animism: attentive inter- actions in the sentient world Deborah Bird Rose Environmental Humanities, University of New South Wales, Australia ABSTRACT Towards the end of her eventful and productive life, Val Plumwood was turning toward Indigenous people and cultures as a way of encountering the lived experience of ideas she was working with theoretically. At the same time, she was defining herself as a philosophical animist. As I understand her term, she was making connections with animism as a worldview, but rather than mimic or appropriate indigenous animisms she was developing a foundation that could be argued from within western philosophy. Her beautiful definition of philosophical animism is that it “opens the door to a world in which we can begin to negotiate life membership of an ecological community of kindred beings.” Thus, her animism, like indigenous animisms, was not a doctrine or orthodoxy, but rather a path, a way of life, a mode of encounter. In the spirit of open-ended encounter, I aim to bring her work into dialogue with some of my Australian Aboriginal teachers. More specifically, I focus on developing an enlarged account of active listening, considering it as the work participants engage in as they inter-act with other sentient creatures. I take a country or place based perspective, engaging with life on the inside of the webs and patterns of connection. An earlier version of this paper was presented as the Val Plumwood Memorial Lecture at the Minding Animals Conference, held in Newcastle, Australia in July 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Paradigm for Environmental Ethics?
    MICHAEL A. PETERS AND RUYU HUNG SOLAR ETHICS: A NEW PARADIGM FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS? FROM ANTHROPOCENTRISM TO SYSTEMISM As the renowned theoretical physicist, Stephen Hawking indicates in a lecture ‘On the Beginning of Time,’ ‘All the evidence seems to indicate, that the universe has not existed forever, but that it had a beginning, about 15 billion years ago. This is probably the most remarkable discovery of modern cosmology. Yet it is now taken for granted.’1 He outlines how the discussion whether or not the universe had a beginning persisted through the 19th and 20th centuries and was conducted on the basis of theology and philosophy on the basis of anthropocentric assumptions with little consideration of observational evidence partly because of the poor unreliability of cosmological evidence up until very recently. ‘Big Bang,’ the name for a cosmological model of the universe coined by Fred Hoyle for a theory he did not believe,2 began with observations by Edwin Hubble and his discovery of evidence for the continuous expansion of the universe. In essence, the theory is based notably on observations of the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation, large-scale structures, and the redshifts of distant supernovae (see Ross, 2008). The technical details need not detain us here as there are many good accounts of the standard model. What is important for our purposes is to note the shift from a set of anthropocentric assumptions to a theory based on observation and its importance for providing an observational and empirical basis for an environmental ethics based on the existence, life, scale and longevity of the sun at the centre of our solar system.3 This feature requires some comment because it is an unusual claim to consider the way in which empirical matters to some extent determine the philosophical nature of environmental ethics even where the notion of ethics in relation to the environment is also unclear.
    [Show full text]
  • Confronting Western Conceptions of Non-Human Animal Cognition Jinji Donato [email protected]
    Rollins College Rollins Scholarship Online Master of Liberal Studies Theses Spring 2019 Confronting Western Conceptions of Non-Human Animal Cognition Jinji Donato [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.rollins.edu/mls Part of the Arts and Humanities Commons Recommended Citation Donato, Jinji, "Confronting Western Conceptions of Non-Human Animal Cognition" (2019). Master of Liberal Studies Theses. 89. https://scholarship.rollins.edu/mls/89 This Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by Rollins Scholarship Online. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master of Liberal Studies Theses by an authorized administrator of Rollins Scholarship Online. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Confronting Western Conceptions of Non-Human Animal Cognition A Project Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Liberal Studies by Jinji Donato May 2019 Mentor: Dr. Ryan Musgrave Reader: Dr. J. Thomas Cook Rollins College Hamilton Holt School Master of Liberal Studies Program Winter Park, Florida Table of Contents Introduction ........................................................................................................................... Disciplines in Dialogue ................................................................................................... 1 The Role of Rationality ................................................................................................... 4 An Interdisciplinary Project............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Technopagans: Hybrid Agency in the More-Than-Human-World
    Technology, Ecology and Spirituality: neopaganism and hybrid ontologies in technoculture Susan Gallacher Bachelor of Arts (Hons) This thesis is presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of Murdoch University 2008 ii I declare that this thesis is my own account of my research and contains as its main content work which has not previously been submitted for a degree at any tertiary education institution. …………………………….. Susan Gallacher iii Abstract This thesis considers three convergent issues pertinent to investigations of identity and agency in contemporary society: the proliferation of digital, network technologies, the rise of interest in secular — ‘new edge’ — spiritualities, and our growing awareness of impending ecological crises. I argue that these three issues necessitate a critical reconsideration of human agency, one that embodies a more sustainable and responsible ‘being-in-the-world’. With this goal in mind, I apply the insights of ecofeminism, feminist approaches to technology and science, and the philosophy of technology, to provide a critical analysis of the human-technology relation in the broader contexts of gender, ecology and spirituality. In particular, I highlight the strengths of ecofeminism, and then employ several alternative theories in order to attend to limitations I identify within ecofeminism; in particular, its uncompromising stance towards modern technology as wholly patriarchal and damaging to both nature and women. Against this position, I argue that technology is fully embedded in and central to our being-in-the- world, and thus must be accounted for in any consideration of contemporary agency. I then attend to both technophobic and technophilic approaches to technology and technoscience in feminism more generally, suggesting how these oppositional tensions are embodied in the figures of the ‘cyborg’ and the ‘goddess’.
    [Show full text]
  • Toward an Ecofeminist Environmental Jurisprudence
    TOWARD AN ECOFEMINIST ENVIRONMENTAL JURISPRUDENCE: NATURE, LAW, AND GENDER Chaone Mallory, B.A. Thesis Prepared for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS August 1999 APPROVED: Max Oelschlaeger, Major Professor J. Baird Callicott, Committee Member Eugene C. Hargrove, Committee Member and Chair of the Department of Philosophy C. Neal Tate, Dean of the Robert B. Toulouse School of Graduate Studies Mallory, Chaone, Toward an Ecofeminist Environmental Jurisprudence: Nature, Law, and Gender. Master of Arts (Philosophy), May, 1999. 106 pp., works consulted, 85 titles. This thesis develops a legal theory reflecting the insights of feminism and environmental philosophy. I argue that human beings are not ontologically separate, but embedded in webs of relationality with natural others. My primary purposes are to 1) delineate ways in which institutions of modernity (such as law and science) have precipitated ecosocial crisis through the attempt to dialectically enforce mastery and control over nature and women; and 2) explore alternate political forms and ontologies which challenge the classical liberalist view of the (human) individual as a radically isolated, discrete, autonomous being. My overarching theme is that law functions as a narrative that can both hinder and enhance the promotion of ecological ideas, and how ecofeminism can contribute to transformative projects of environmental philosophy and feminist law. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to acknowledge the invaluable assistance of my committee, Max Oelschlaeger, Gene Hargrove, and Baird Callicott, faculty members whom I consider friends as well as professors, and without whose inspiration, skepticism, patience, pointed questioning, encouragement, and tolerance this thesis could not have been completed. I also wish to thank the Women’s Studies Program at the University of North Texas for their generosity in providing a research fellowship to assist in the writing.
    [Show full text]
  • Feminist Theory and Formal Logic 1 All Rights Reserved
    Representing Reason Feminist Theory and Formal Logk Edited by Rachel Joffe Falmagne and Marjorie Hass ROWMAN & LITTLEFIELD PUBLISHERS, INC. Lanham • Boulder • New York • Oxford Contents ROWMAN & LITTLEFIELD PUBLISHERS, INC. Published in the United States of America by Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. A Member of the Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group 4720 Boston Way, Lanham, Maryland 20706 www.rowmanlittlefield.com 12 Hid's Copse Road Cumnor Hill, Oxford OX2 9JJ, England Acknowledgments vii Copyright © 2002 by Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. Introduction Representing Reason: Feminist Theory and Formal Logic 1 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a Marjorie Hass and Rachel Joffe Falmagne retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Part 1 Logic and The Structure of Thought British Library Cataloguing in Publication Information Available Chapter 1 The Politics of Reason: Toward a Feminist Logic 11 Val Plumwood Library of Congress Cataloging.. in.. Publication Data Chapter 2 Feminism and the Logic of Alterity 45 Representing reason: feminist theory and formal logic/ edited by Rachel Joffe Falmagne Val Plumwood and Marjorie Hass. p.cm. Chapter 3 Fluid Thinking: lrigaray's Critique of Formal Logic 71 Includes bibliographical references and index. Marjorie Hass ISBN 0-8476-9668-5 (alk. paper)-ISBN 0-8476-9669-3 (pbk.: alk. Chapter 4 "Power in the Service of Love": John Dewey's Logic paper) 89 1. Logic. 2. Feminist theory. I. Falmagne, Rachel Joffe. IL Hass, and the Dream of a Common Language Marjorie, 1965- Carroll Guen Hart BC57 .R47 2002 Chapter 5 Words of Power and the Logic of Sense 117 1601 .82--dc21 2002006968 Dorothea E.
    [Show full text]