TPM/IPM Weekly Report for Arborists, Landscape Managers & Nursery Managers
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Maryland Entomologist
THE MARYLAND ENTOMOLOGIST Insect and related-arthropod studies in the Mid-Atlantic region Volume 7, Number 2 September 2018 September 2018 The Maryland Entomologist Volume 7, Number 2 MARYLAND ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY www.mdentsoc.org Executive Committee: President Frederick Paras Vice President Philip J. Kean Secretary Janet A. Lydon Treasurer Edgar A. Cohen, Jr. Historian (vacant) Journal Editor Eugene J. Scarpulla E-newsletter Editors Aditi Dubey The Maryland Entomological Society (MES) was founded in November 1971, to promote the science of entomology in all its sub-disciplines; to provide a common meeting venue for professional and amateur entomologists residing in Maryland, the District of Columbia, and nearby areas; to issue a periodical and other publications dealing with entomology; and to facilitate the exchange of ideas and information through its meetings and publications. The MES was incorporated in April 1982 and is a 501(c)(3) non-profit, scientific organization. The MES logo features an illustration of Euphydryas phaëton (Drury) (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae), the Baltimore Checkerspot, with its generic name above and its specific epithet below (both in capital letters), all on a pale green field; all these are within a yellow ring double-bordered by red, bearing the message “● Maryland Entomological Society ● 1971 ●”. All of this is positioned above the Shield of the State of Maryland. In 1973, the Baltimore Checkerspot was named the official insect of the State of Maryland through the efforts of many MES members. Membership in the MES is open to all persons interested in the study of entomology. All members receive the annual journal, The Maryland Entomologist, and the monthly e-newsletter, Phaëton. -
Assessing Bumble Bee Diversity, Distribution, and Status for the Michigan Wildlife Action Plan
Assessing Bumble Bee Diversity, Distribution, and Status for the Michigan Wildlife Action Plan Prepared By: Logan M. Rowe, David L. Cuthrell, and Helen D. Enander Michigan Natural Features Inventory Michigan State University Extension P.O. Box 13036 Lansing, MI 48901 Prepared For: Michigan Department of Natural Resources Wildlife Division 12/17/2019 MNFI Report No. 2019-33 Suggested Citation: Rowe, L. M., D. L. Cuthrell., H. D. Enander. 2019. Assessing Bumble Bee Diversity, Distribution, and Status for the Michigan Wildlife Action Plan. Michigan Natural Features Inventory, Report Number 2019- 33, Lansing, USA. Copyright 2019 Michigan State University Board of Trustees. MSU Extension programs and materials are open to all without regard to race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, marital status or family status. Cover: Bombus terricola taken by D. L. Cuthrell Table of Contents Abstract ........................................................................................................................................................ iii Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 1 Methods ........................................................................................................................................................ 2 Museum Searches .................................................................................................................................... -
Bumblebee Conservator
Volume 2, Issue 1: First Half 2014 Bumblebee Conservator Newsletter of the BumbleBee Specialist Group In this issue From the Chair From the Chair 1 A very happy and productive 2014 to everyone! We start this year having seen From the Editor 1 enormously encouraging progress in 2013. Our different regions have started from BBSG Executive Committee 2 very different positions, in terms of established knowledge of their bee faunas Regional Coordinators 2 as well as in terms of resources available, but members in all regions are actively moving forward. In Europe and North America, which have been fortunate to Bumblebee Specialist have the most specialists over the last century, we are achieving the first species Group Report 2013 3 assessments. Mesoamerica and South America are also very close, despite the huge Bumblebees in the News 9 areas to survey and the much less well known species. In Asia, with far more species, many of them poorly known, remarkably rapid progress is being made in sorting Research 13 out what is present and in building the crucial keys and distribution maps. In some Conservation News 20 regions there are very few people to tackle the task, sometimes in situations that Bibliography 21 make progress challenging and slow – their enthusiasm is especially appreciated! At this stage, broad discussion of problems and of the solutions developed from your experience will be especially important. This will direct the best assessments for focusing the future of bumblebee conservation. From the Editor Welcome to the second issue of the Bumblebee Conservator, the official newsletter of the Bumblebee Specialist Group. -
Delaware's Wildlife Species of Greatest Conservation Need
CHAPTER 1 DELAWARE’S WILDLIFE SPECIES OF GREATEST CONSERVATION NEED CHAPTER 1: Delaware’s Wildlife Species of Greatest Conservation Need Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 7 Regional Context ........................................................................................................................................... 7 Delaware’s Animal Biodiversity .................................................................................................................... 10 State of Knowledge of Delaware’s Species ................................................................................................... 10 Delaware’s Wildlife and SGCN - presented by Taxonomic Group .................................................................. 11 Delaware’s 2015 SGCN Status Rank Tier Definitions................................................................................. 12 TIER 1 .................................................................................................................................................... 13 TIER 2 .................................................................................................................................................... 13 TIER 3 .................................................................................................................................................... 13 Mammals .................................................................................................................................................... -
This Document Is Made Available Electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library As Part of an Ongoing Digital Archiving Project
This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp Cover photography: Blanding’s turtle (Emys blandingii) hatchling, Camp Ripley Training Center, August 2018. Photography by Camp Ripley Envrionmental staff. Minnesota Army National Guard Camp Ripley Training Center and Arden Hills Army Training Site 2018 Conservation Program Report January 1 – December 31, 2018 Division of Ecological and Water Resources Minnesota Department of Natural Resources for the Minnesota Army National Guard MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES CAMP RIPLEY SERIES REPORT NO. 28 ©2019, State of Minnesota Contact Information: MNDNR Information Center 500 Lafayette Road Saint Paul, MN 55155-4040 (651) 296-6157 Toll Free 1-888-MINNDNR (646-6367) TYY (Hearing Impaired) (651) 296-5484 1-800-657-3929 www.dnr.state.mn.us This report should be cited as follows: Minnesota Department of Natural Resources and Minnesota Army National Guard. 2019. Minnesota Army National Guard, Camp Ripley Training Center and Arden Hills Army Training Site, 2018 Conservation Program Report, January 1 – December 31, 2018. Compiled by Katie Retka, Camp Ripley Series Report No. 28, Little Falls, MN, USA. 234 pp. Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................................... 1 Camp Ripley Training Center ..................................................................................................................................... -
Bumble Bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) of Montana (PDF)
Bumble Bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) of Montana Authors: Amelia C. Dolan, Casey M. Delphia, Kevin M. O'Neill, and Michael A. Ivie This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in Annals of the Entomological Society of America following peer review. The version of record for (see citation below) is available online at: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aesa/saw064. Dolan, Amelia C., Casey M Delphia, Kevin M. O'Neill, and Michael A. Ivie. "Bumble Bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) of Montana." Annals of the Entomological Society of America 110, no. 2 (September 2017): 129-144. DOI: 10.1093/aesa/saw064. Made available through Montana State University’s ScholarWorks scholarworks.montana.edu Bumble Bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) of Montana Amelia C. Dolan,1 Casey M. Delphia,1,2,3 Kevin M. O’Neill,1,2 and Michael A. Ivie1,4 1Montana Entomology Collection, Montana State University, Marsh Labs, Room 50, 1911 West Lincoln St., Bozeman, MT 59717 ([email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]), 2Department of Land Resources and Environmental Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717, 3Department of Ecology, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717, and 4Corresponding author, e-mail: [email protected] Subject Editor: Allen Szalanski Received 10 May 2016; Editorial decision 12 August 2016 Abstract Montana supports a diverse assemblage of bumble bees (Bombus Latreille) due to its size, landscape diversity, and location at the junction of known geographic ranges of North American species. We compiled the first in- ventory of Bombus species in Montana, using records from 25 natural history collections and labs engaged in bee research, collected over the past 125 years, as well as specimens collected specifically for this project dur- ing the summer of 2015. -
IUCN Assessments for North American Bombus Spp
IUCN Assessments for North American Bombus spp. Prepared by: Rich Hatfield*±, Sheila Colla†, Sarina Jepsen*, Leif Richardson‡, Robbin Thorp∆, and Sarah Foltz Jordan* Assessments completed December 2014 Document updated March 2, 2015 Bombus occidentalis on Solidago canadensis. Photo by R. Hatfield ± Corresponding author: [email protected] * The Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation, 628 NE Broadway, Suite 200, Portland, OR 97232, xerces.org † Wildlife Preservation Canada 5420 Side Road 6, Guelph, ON N1H 6J2 CANADA wildlifepreservation.ca ‡ Gund Institute for Ecological Economics, University of Vermont, 617 Main Street Burlington, VT 05405 ∆ University of California at Davis, Department of Entomology and Nematology Main Office, UC Davis Briggs Hall, Room 367, Davis, CA 95616-5270 Table of Contents Introducon ............................................................................................................................................................. 3 Methods ................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Bombus affinis .......................................................................................................................................................... 8 Bombus appositus .................................................................................................................................................... 9 Bombus auricomus .................................................................................................................................................. -
American Bumble Bee Bombus Pensylvanicus
American Bumble Bee Bombus pensylvanicus Texas Master Naturalist 2020 Certification Pin Bumble Bee Physiology and Foraging Physiology Intelligence Long-tongues Innovation • Can fly in • Learn to • Visit diverse • Use their cold/wet access flowers strength to conditions resources their advantage Source: Bumble Bee Conservation Trust; The Xerces Society/Rich Hatfield and Eric Lee Mader Bumble Bee Life History • Annual Species • Queen Emerges in the Spring Gravid • Cavity & Ground Nester • Incubates eggs when establishing a new nest Bumble Bee Life History Large Nest Sizes Cuckoos? Fall Mating & Dispersal Winter Hibernation State of the Bumble Bees of North America Critically Endangered Endangered Vulnerable Near Threatened Least Concern Data Deficient Source: IUCN Red List Bumble Bees of Texas Bumble Bee Species IUCN Rank Least Bombus griseocolis Concern Least Bombus impatiens Concern Least Bombus bimaculatus Concern Critically Bombus variabilis* Endangered Bombus pensylvanicus* Vulnerable Least Bombus auricomus Concern Bombus fervidus Vulnerable Bombus fraternus Endangered Source: IUCN Red List, Photo: Ross Winton American Bumble Bee Bombus pensylvanicus 1914-Present American Bumble Bee Bombus pensylvanicus Current vs. Historic Range Causes of Population Decline Source: Jack Ohman, The Sacramento Bee 5/7/2013 Causes of Population Decline Habitat Loss Photo: Eric Mader, Matthew Shepherd Causes of Population Decline Pesticides Source: USGS Pesticide National Synthesis Project Causes of Population Decline Pesticides Source: IUCN Red List, -
B. Wichita Mountains Wildlife Refuge Species Lists
Appendix B: Wichita Mountains Wildlife Refuge Species Lists B. Wichita Mountains Wildlife Refuge Species Lists . All species lists developed from Refuge inventories and surveys and Ft. Sill Comprehensive Surveys . A singleasterisk (*) denotes that the species is non-native. Vertebrates Amphibians Scientific Name Common Name Acris crepitans Northern cricket frog Ambystoma mavortium Barred tiger salamander Ambystoma texanum Small-mouthed salamander Anaxyrus woodhousei Woodhouse’s toad Anaxyrus speciosus Texas toad Anaxyrus cognatus Great plains toad Anaxyrus debilis debilis Eastern green toad Anaxyrus punctatus Red-spotted toad Gastrophryne olivacea Great plains narrowmouth toad Hyla versicolor Gray treefrog Hyla chrysoscelis Cope’s gray treefrog Lithobates catesbeiana Bullfrog Lithobates blairi Plains leopard frog Lithobates sphenocephalus Southern leopard frog Pseudacris clarkii Spotted chorus frog Pseudacris streckeri Strecker’s chorus frog Scaphiopus couchii Couch’s spadefoot Spea bombifrons Plains spadefoot Birds Occurance Information A - Abundant: a common and numerous species C - Common: certain to be seen in suitable habitat U - Uncommon: present, but not certain to be seen R - Rare: seen at intervals of 2 to 5 years X - Accidental: has been seen only once or twice Wichita Mountains Wildlife Refuge DRAFT CCP and Environmental Assessment B-1 Appendix B: Wichita Mountains Wildlife Refuge Species Lists ring mmer Scientific Name Common Name inter all Sp Su F W Accipiter cooperii Cooper's hawk U U U U Accipiter gentilis Northern goshawk -
Download Download
Additional Notes On Indiana Bumble Bees (Bombidae, Hymenoptera) 1 Leland Chandler, Purdue University In a previous paper by the author (1), fifteen species and three color varieties of Bombidae were listed as occurring within the state. Three of these species were listed without definite state records. Studies of additional material have resulted in definite records of two of these species, Bombus ternarius Say and Psithyrus ashtoni (Cresson), as well as one other species of Bombus and two color varieties of Bombus heretofore unrecorded. New locality records for a number of species already known to occur are also given. Species and Color Variants New to Indiana Bombus affinis var. novae-angliae Bequaert. This is a color variant of B. affinis Cresson and is known only from the worker and male castes. It differs from the typical species by the presence of some ferruginous pile on some of the abdominal tergites after the second. The Indiana specimen is a male and has the apical portion of the third abdominal tergite and the basal portion of the fourth abdominal tergite covered with ferruginous pile. The specimen was collected by Prof. R. T. Everly of Purdue Uni- versity in Miami County, two miles north of Peru. It was taken Sep- tember 14, 1950 on aster. A typical male of B. affinis was taken on an adjacent goldenrod at the same time. Bombus bimaculatus var. ridingsii Cresson. This color variant differs from the typical B. bimaculatus Cresson by the presence of yellow pile on some of the abdominal tergites after the second. The Indiana specimen is a male that has the fourth abdominal tergite entirely covered with yellow pile. -
2006 ESA Awardees Announced
ESA Newsletter Information for the Members of the Entomological Society of America NOVEMBER 2006 • VOLUME 29, NUMBER 11 2006 ESA Awardees Announced ESA is pleased to announce the winners Distinguished Achievement Award in of its 2006 awards program. The Society’s Horticultural Entomology (Sponsored by 2007 Election Results professional awards will be presented at the American Nursery and Landscape As- The votes from the 2007 ESA elections the 2006 Annual Meeting in Indianapolis sociation)—Originally meant to honor regu- conducted in July and August are in! The during the Plenary Session on the evening latory entomologists, this award has been following incoming officers will begin of Sunday, December 10, 2006. The stu- redefined to honor any entomologist who their terms at the ESA Final Business dent awards session will be held from 6:30 has contributed to Meeting in Indianapolis on Wednesday, p.m.-7:30 p.m. on Tuesday, December 12, the American hor- December 13: following the final round of the Linnaean ticulture industry. Games in the Wabash Ballroom in the Con- This year’s awardee, Vice President-Elect: vention Center. The Society’s professional Dr. Daniel A. Pot- Dr. Marlin E. Rice and student awards are listed alphabetically ter, is a professor of Governing Board Representatives below with professional awards listed first. entomology at the Eastern Branch: Dr. George Winners of the Entomological Founda- University of Ken- C. Hamilton tion’s awards and scholarships will be an- tucky who has stud- Southwestern Branch: Dr. Marvin nounced in next month’s newsletter. ied and taught about K. Harris, BCE turf and landscape Section C: Gail E. -
Bumble Bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) of Texas: Historical Distributions
THE SOUTHWESTERN NATURALIST 57(4): 442–445 DECEMBER 2012 BUMBLE BEES (HYMENOPTERA: APIDAE) OF TEXAS: HISTORICAL DISTRIBUTIONS MICHAEL D. WARRINER Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, 4200 Smith School Road, Austin, TX 78744 Correspondent: [email protected] ABSTRACT—I compiled data from several museum collections to map historical distributions of species of bumble bees across Texas. Bombus auricomus, B. bimaculatus, B. fervidus, B. fraternus, B. griseocollis, B. impatiens, B. pensylvanicus, B. sonorus, and B. variabilis were confirmed from the state based on vouchered specimens. As currently understood, the bumble bee fauna of Texas consists of nine documented species. RESUMEN— Compil´e datos de espec´ımenes de varias colecciones de museos para mapear las distribuciones hist´oricas de las especies de abejorros a trav´es del estado de Texas. Bombus auricomus, B. bimaculatus, B. fervidus, B. fraternus, B. griseocollis, B. impatiens, B. pensylvanicus, B. sonorus y B. variabilis fueron confirmados para el estado basa´ndose en ejemplares registrados. Como se entiende actualmente, la fauna de abejorros de Texas se compone de nueve especies documentadas. Over the past three decades, a significant body of ability to buzz pollinate, bumble bees are considered research has identified declines in bumble bee (Bombus) effective native pollinators (Goulson, 2003) that make faunas of several European nations (Williams, 1982; substantial contributions to agricultural production and Sa´rospataki et al., 2005; Goulson et al., 2006; Fitzpatrick maintenance of ecosystems (Kearns and Thomson, 2001). et al., 2007; Kosior et al., 2007; Williams and Osborne, The economic and ecological value, coupled with recent 2009). In the United Kingdom, three species are now evidence of decline, underscores a critical need for local extinct and another eight have undergone dramatic and regional faunal assessments aimed at gaining a better reductions in range (Goulson, 2003).