Chapter 3 Bath's Historical and Geographical Setting

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Chapter 3 Bath's Historical and Geographical Setting CHAPTER 3 BATH’S HISTORICAL AND GEOGRAPHICAL SETTING INTRODUCTION Shaped by historical and geological events, Bath, Maine is a slim needle of a city, pulled north and south along the western bank of the Kennebec River. This needle—about 5 miles long and 1 mile wide—formed of homes, farms, businesses and industries has sewn the inhabitants of Bath into centuries of American history with the threads of the many ships built here. This chapter examines the historical and geographical setting of the City of Ships. But any examination of this history that numbers so few pages cannot possibly present all the important events, individuals and groups. The following provides illustrative examples and aspects, but does not do justice to the rich history of this community and those that have peopled it. THE GEOLOGIC SETTING OF THE CITY Bath’s suitability as a shipbuilding port was, in a sense, created by the ancient geologic forces that molded the entire east coast of the United States. The folding, faulting, and crumpling of the earth’s crust formed the Appalachian Mountains and its associated chains. Two-hundred million years of uplift and river erosion, followed by two-million years of glacial erosion, shaped the New England landscape. During the glacial epoch the weight of the ice depressed the crust, allowing flooding of the valleys upon the melting of the glacial ice. The valleys of the drowned coastline became bays and inlets; the higher ridges producing the peninsulas and islands of the midcoast region. Through eons the geologic landscape evolved into local topography that encouraged our maritime industry. The glacier left many lakes in New England; the largest in the area is Moosehead Lake, the source of the Kennebec River. In Bath about 12 miles upstream from Popham and the river’s mouth, the channel of the Kennebec flows wide and straight from Thorne Head to Fiddler’s Reach and Winnegance, almost five miles of what would be known as Long Reach. This maneuverable half-mile-wide stretch of tidal river was made accessible by the low and gentle relief of the area, particularly at water’s edge where land Chapter 3 Page 1 slopes gradually, allowing the easy use of shore for maritime industries. The Kennebec here, despite troublesome currents, also possesses a soft, sandy bottom that provided good anchorage. On the western bank of Long Reach, a series of granite-supported ridges generally parallels the line of the river, successive ridges rising like steps away from the river. Three of these ridges hold the major north-south streets that emphasize the elongated shape of Bath—Washington, Middle, and High Streets. The subdivision of early land holdings would create long, slender parcels that stretched across these ridges to the all-important water. These property lines often determined the placement of the east- west cross streets in the young community. To the south and west, the land rises more sharply to heights that strongly influenced and contained the location of initial settlement and continued development. The settlement focused on the river, the major road of its time and the source of much industry. As time progressed, development even reached out into the water as wharves were extended, creeks diverted, and low and near-shore areas artificially filled. And so, the coastline of Long Reach was rewritten, not by geological forces, but by human action into Bath, the City of Ships. PREHISTORY AND EARLY CONTACT IN THE MIDCOAST REGION That human imprint on the landscape began with the Native-American presence in the region some twelve thousand or more years ago—before the state was completely ice-free from the glacier. Approximately one thousand years prior to European contact, this part of North America was the home of the Eastern Algonquian who typically organized in small local bands with seasonal residences. For some of those bands, the Kennebec River provided an important transportation route, providing a path between the subsistence-lifestyle resources of the interior lakes, the tidal estuaries, and the offshore islands. Just before contact with the Europeans, the patterns of life in the Northeast for the Native Americans were evolving rapidly in response to technological innovations within agricultural practices, ceramic use, and canoe construction. The rhythms of this well-rooted but developing life were interrupted by the arrival of the European explorer and trader. European interest in this portion of the so-called “New World” was intermittent. The contact between European fishermen and the natives of Maine was limited in the sixteenth century. The shifting fashionable and Chapter 3 Page 2 political desires of a European population, however, drove more explorers to the coast and inland in their search for both beaver pelts and areas for colonization. The Kennebec River in the immediate vicinity of Bath was investigated by Samuel de Champlain in 1605 and John Smith in 1616. With this intensification of interest in the area of Maine and the resulting visits came the epidemics that left a coastline of New England described in 1619 as dotted with “ancient Plantations, not long since populous now utterly void; other places a remnant remains but not free of sickness” (quoted in Bourque: 119). No permanent Native-American settlements have been identified in Bath, but in the shoreland zone some archaeological sites associated with seasonal or hunting camps of pre-contact and early post-contact populations have been located. POPHAM COLONY AND EARLY SETTLEMENT: 1607-1750 English colonization began famously and briefly on the doorstep of Bath at the failed Popham Colony in 1607. That temporary settlement contributed to the general knowledge of the Kennebec River and the neighboring region. More serious resettlement slowly began in 1630 in the area labeled as Sagadahock that included Bath, West Bath, Woolwich, Arrowsic, Georgetown, Phippsburg, and even portions of Brunswick. Trading posts and budding settlements by adventurous individuals sprang up along the Kennebec in the middle of the seventeenth century. In the current limits of the city, settlements by Christopher Lawson and Alexander Thwaite were significant. Within a dozen years they were joined by a handful of others. In 1665 as the number of colonists rose, the town of Kennebec was acknowledged formally although bounds were not specifically defined. This town of Kennebec separated Bath, Phippsburg, and Brunswick on the western bank of the river from the more populated eastern portions of the Sagadahock area. Much of what was the central portion of Bath was owned by Robert Gutch. When he died in 1667, the land that he had obtained from Robinhood, Terrumquin, Weasomonasco, Scawque, and Abumhamen, representatives of the Kennebec tribe, was left to his eight children, although it would not be divided and sold for nearly ninety years by the remaining descendants of four of his daughters. The pattern of settlement, including the process of purchasing parcels, establishing homes and businesses, and creating local governments, was disrupted in the third quarter of the seventeenth century. The generally Chapter 3 Page 3 good relations between the indigenous people and the newer residents of New England were torn apart by a series of wars that may have been inevitable, considering the differing world views of these groups and the competitive nature of the European powers. The first of these wars, known as King Philip’s War, began in Massachusetts in 1675. The turmoil spread to Maine, culminating in this region in the raids the next year on both the Hammond Trading Post at the Narrows across from Chops Point on the eastern shore of the Kennebec and the Clarke and Lake Post in Arrowsic, from which only five colonists escaped death or capture. Although some colonists persevered in the coming years, additional wars, attacks and counter-incursions soon persuaded virtually all that the towns of Sagadahock and Kennebec were best abandoned at this time. After the resolution of Queen Anne’s War in 1714, English settlers returned to this region, at least temporarily, beginning with Arrowsic Island. Here in 1716 the township of Georgetown was established. In Bath, repopulation dragged; only three families lived within the current limits of the city between the resolution of Queen Anne’s War and the beginning of Dummer’s War in 1722.1 At that time, apparently all three lost their homes to the fires of Indian raids. In North Bath at the Chops, Joseph Maynes established his ferry where Merrymeeting Bay and the Kennebec meet during the first part of the eighteenth century (Dearborn Lovetere). Rebuilding began once again in 1725. By 1738 five families had created homesteads in Long Reach, as Bath was known at that time. This time the foothold was permanent, despite skirmishes with Indians in the coming years. In that same year Georgetown was organized and enlarged to encompass the current towns of Bath, West Bath, Phippsburg, Arrowsic, Woolwich, and Georgetown. THE SECOND PARISH BEGINS: 1753-1760 In 1753 the forty families north of Winnegance Creek successfully petitioned the legislature of the Massachusetts Colony for permission to incorporate the second parish of Georgetown. Noting the difficulty, particularly in winter, of travel to the Meetinghouse in Georgetown, the inhabitants wished to establish their own place of worship, but not to separate from the town or its governance. The residents had already set 1 A map dating from 1718 indicates the pioneering homestead of the cooper Christopher Lawson from some fifty years earlier, noting “Mr. Lawson’s Cellar” in North Bath (Dearborn Lovetere). Chapter 3 Page 4 aside small parcels as private cemeteries.2 The first meetinghouse, Bath’s first public building, finished in 1762, was on the current Berry’s Mill Road in West Bath, where the town road (corresponding to today’s Western Avenue which was a continuation of High Street) intersected the old military road.
Recommended publications
  • 2020 Corporate Sustainability Report
    TRANSPARENCY. TRUST. ALIGNMENT. HONESTY. 2020 Corporate Sustainability Report OUR ETHOS TRANSPARENCY. TRUST. ALIGNMENT. HONESTY. These four values undergird everything we do at General Dynamics — they are our defining moral character. All of us at General Dynamics have a duty to behave according to these values. Through our shared Ethos, we ensure that we continue to be good stewards of the investments our shareholders, customers, employees and communities make in us, now and in the future. TABLE OF CONTENTS OUR ETHOS 2 A Letter From Our CEO 4 OUR BUSINESS 5 Our Values at Work 6 Business Overview 7 Corporate Responsibility 10 Global Supply Chain 12 GOVERNANCE 14 Corporate Governance 15 Ethics 18 Information Security 21 HUMAN CAPITAL MANAGEMENT 25 Employee Safety 26 Employee Well-Being 27 Developing and Engaging Our Talent 28 DIVERSITY AND INCLUSION 29 Diversity Is Critical to Innovation 30 Talent Recruiting and Retaining Diverse Talent 32 Awards & Recognition 36 ENVIRONMENT 37 Environmental Responsibility 38 Examples From Our Businesses 41 COMMUNITY RELATIONS 45 Investing in Our Communities 46 COVID-19 Response 50 REPORTING APPROACH 52 A Letter from Our CEO Dear Fellow Shareholder, Corporate sustainability at General Dynamics is rooted in our Ethos — our defining moral character as a company and the standard to which we hold ourselves and our more than 100,000 employees worldwide. It informs all that we do and guides us as we deliver value to our shareholders, our customers and our communities. Ongoing conversations with all of our stakeholders have been an integral part of building and evolving our sustainability program. We remain committed to reducing our global environmental impact, including our carbon footprint; protecting and promoting human rights; increasing the diversity of our workforce; supporting the health, welfare and safety of our employees; and fostering mutually beneficial relationships with our communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Examining the Economic Impacts of Hydropower Dams on Property Values Using GIS
    Journal of Environmental Management 90 (2009) S258–S269 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Environmental Management journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jenvman Examining the economic impacts of hydropower dams on property values using GIS Curtis Bohlen, Lynne Y. Lewis* Department of Economics, Bates College, Lewiston, ME 04240, United States article info abstract Article history: While the era of dam building is largely over in the United States, globally dams are still being proposed Received 25 October 2007 and constructed. The articles in this special issue consider many aspects and impacts of dams around the Received in revised form 30 March 2008 world. This paper examines dam removal and the measurement of the impacts of dams on local Accepted 30 July 2008 community property values. Valuable lessons may be found. Available online 20 November 2008 In the United States, hundreds of small hydropower dams will come up for relicensing in the coming decade. Whether or not the licensees are renewed and what happens to the dams if the licenses expires Keywords: is a subject of great debate. Dams are beginning to be removed for river restoration and fisheries Dams Dam removal restoration and these ‘‘end-of-life’’ decisions may offer lessons for countries proposing or currently Hedonic property value analysis building small (and large) hydropower dams. What can these restoration stories tell us? GIS In this paper, we examine the effects of dams along the Penobscot River in Maine (USA) on residential property values. We compare the results to findings from a similar (but ex post dam removal) data set for properties along the Kennebec river in Maine, where the Edwards Dam was removed in 1999.
    [Show full text]
  • Atlantic Coast: Eastport, ME to Cape Cod, MA UNITED STATES Atlantic Co Eastport, M Cape Cod, UNITED STATES 2014 (44Th) Edition
    UNITEDUNITED SSTTAATTEESS AtAtlanticlantic Coast: EastpoEastporrtt,, MEM to CaCapepe Codd,, MA 2014 (44th) Edition This edition cancels the 43rd Edition and includes all previously published corrections. Weekly updates to this edition are available at: http://nauticalcharts.noaa.gov/nsd/cpdownload.htm They are also published in the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA) U.S. Notice to Mariners. U.S. Department of Commerce Penny Pritzker, Secretary of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Kathryn Sullivan, Ph.D., Acting Under Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere, and Administrator, NOAA National Ocean Service Holly Bamford, Ph.D., Assistant Administrator, National Ocean Service II U.S. Coast Pilot 1 Pilot Coast U.S. 72° 70° 68° 66° Calais CANADA Coast Pilot 1 – Chapter Index UNITED STATES Chapter 4 – Quoddy Narrows to Calais, Maine MAINE 4 Chapter 5 – Quoddy Narrows to Petit Manan Island, Maine Eastport Chapter 6 – Petit Manan Island to Jericho Bay, Maine BAY OF FUNDY Chapter 7 – Jericho Bay to Penobscot Bay, Maine Bangor Chapter 8 – Muscongus Bay to Cape Elizabeth, Maine Chapter 9 – Cape Elizabeth, Maine to Cape Ann, Massachusetts Machias Chapter 10 – Cape Ann to Boston Harbor, Massachusetts Chapter 11 – Boston Harbor and Approaches 5 Chapter 12 – Minots Ledge to Provincetown, Massachusetts 8 6 NOV A SCOTIA CANADA 44° 44° Bath PENOBSCOT BAY NEW HAMPSHIRE 7 Portland CASCO BAY Portsmouth 9 NORTH ATLANTIC OCEAN Gloucester Salem 10 MASSACHUSETTS Boston 11 42° 42° 12 72° 70° 68° 66° U.S. Coast Pilot 1, Preface III Preface he United States Coast Pilot is published by the National Ocean Service (NOS), National TOceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), pursuant to the Act of 6 August 1947 (33 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Shorey's Brook Dam to Be Removed in York County
    FALL 2011/ WINTER 2012 THE NEWSLETTER OF MAINE RIVERS Shorey’s Brook Dam to be Removed in York County Much of the 4.3-mile Shorey’s in August 2010. Led by project Brook in South Berwick has manager and stewardship not actually looked like a coordinator Darrell DeTour, typical brook for many years. GWRLT has gathered many !e culprit is a dam perched partners, including the Wells several hundred yards below National Estuarine Research Route 101. Built as early as Reserve, the National the 1630s, it has morphed over Oceanic and Atmospheric the centuries into a decrepit Administration, Conservation hodgepodge of industrial Decrepit and inconspicuous, the Shorey’s Brook dam Law Foundation, the US Fish material, impenetrable by is di!cult to capture in a picture. Right, Tin Smith and Wildlife Service, and anadromous "sh including leads a tour of the restoration site. others, to plan, permit, and alewives, smelt, and Atlantic fund the removal. salmon. A dam removal is currently on track to take place !is project promises to be a success in Maine both for in November to restore the brook. In early October we reconnecting long-fragmented habitat and as a model to toured the dam removal site with members of Great Works inspire other entities—land trusts, municipalities, and Regional Land Trust and other project partners. others—who may be considering a dam removal project !e Great Works Regional Land Trust (GWRLT) acquired but are daunted by the perceived complexity and cost. To the 27-acre Raymond & Simone Savage Wildlife Preserve date this project has drawn little controversy and is on that surrounds Shorey’s Brook in 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Benefits of Dam Removal
    A Research Paper by Dam Removal: Case Studies on the Fiscal, Economic, Social, and Environmental Benefits of Dam Removal October 2016 <Year> Dam Removal: Case Studies on the Fiscal, Economic, Social, and Environmental Benefits of Dam Removal October 2016 PUBLISHED ONLINE: http://headwaterseconomics.org/economic-development/local-studies/dam-removal-case-studies ABOUT HEADWATERS ECONOMICS Headwaters Economics is an independent, nonprofit research group whose mission is to improve community development and land management decisions in the West. CONTACT INFORMATION Megan Lawson, Ph.D.| [email protected] | 406-570-7475 P.O. Box 7059 Bozeman, MT 59771 http://headwaterseconomics.org Cover Photo: Whittenton Pond Dam, Mill River, Massachusetts. American Rivers. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 1 MEASURING THE BENEFITS OF DAM REMOVAL ........................................................................................... 2 CONCLUSION ................................................................................................................................................. 5 CASE STUDIES WHITTENTON POND DAM, MILL RIVER, MASSACHUSETTS ........................................................................ 11 ELWHA AND GLINES CANYON DAMS, ELWHA RIVER, WASHINGTON ........................................................ 14 EDWARDS DAM, KENNEBEC RIVER, MAINE ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Coast Guard, DHS § 165.106
    Coast Guard, DHS § 165.106 by the Captain of the Port, Portland, pay a port call, in the Portland, Maine, Maine or his authorized patrol rep- Captain of the Port zone as delineated resentative. in 33 CFR 3.05–15. (d) The Captain of the Port will no- (b) Location. The following areas are tify the maritime community and local security zones: agencies of periods during which these (1) All navigable waters within the safety and security zones will be in ef- Portland, Maine, Captain of the Port fect by providing notice of arrivals and Zone, extending from the surface to the departures of LPG vessels via the tele- sea floor, within a 100-yard radius of phone and/or Marine Safety Informa- any passenger vessel that is anchored, tion Radio Broadcasts. moored, or in the process of mooring. [CGD01–02–045, 67 FR 56487, Sept. 4, 2002] (2) All navigable waters, within the Portland, Maine, Captain of the Port § 165.104 Safety Zone: Vessel Zone, extending from the surface to the Launches, Bath Iron Works, Ken- sea floor, extending 200 yards ahead, nebec River, Bath, Maine. and 100 yards aside and astern of any (a) Location. The following is a safety passenger vessel that is underway. zone: all waters of the Kennebec River (c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with within a 150-yard radius of the Bath the general regulations in § 165.33 of Iron Works dry dock while it is being this part, entry into or movement moved to and from its moored position within these zones is prohibited unless at the Bath Iron Works Facility in previously authorized by the Coast Bath, Maine to a deployed position in Guard Captain of the Port, Portland, the Kennebec River, and while launch- Maine (COTP) or his designated rep- ing or recovering vessels.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 - Issue 3 When You’Re on the Job, It’S Important to Have the Right Tools
    2014 - ISSUE 3 WHEN YOU’RE ON THE JOB, IT’S IMPORTANT TO HAVE THE RIGHT TOOLS. Anchor Checking. ■ Free worldwide ATMs* ■ Free iPhone® and Android® apps Only from ■ Free online banking, mobile ■ Free domestic incoming wires and Camden National Bank. banking and bill pay cashier’s checks — and more! Wherever you are in the world, you can count on Camden National Bank every step of the way. Visit one of our 44 branches statewide or online at CamdenNational.com to open your account today. *Unlimited refunds when using a non-Camden National Bank ATM in the United States per withdrawal. Accept the disclosure fee and we will refund the surcharge. For ATM transactions outside the United States, Puerto Rico, or U.S. Virgin Islands, we will refund the ATM fee if you bring in the ATM receipt showing the surcharge within 90 days of the transaction. CNBRB_MMAAnchorCheckingAd_PRINT_110714.indd 1 11/7/14 3:10 PM Content MARINER STAFF IN THIS ISSUE Director of College Relations Jennifer DeJoy / [email protected] 26 Editor Laurie Stone / [email protected] Designer & Production Editor Deanna Yocom / [email protected] Ad Representative Deanna Yocom / [email protected] AdministratiON President Dr. William J. Brennan Provost & V. P. for Academic Affairs Meet Emily Wyman ’17. Photo by D Sinclair. Dr. David M. Gardner V. P. for Enrollment Management Dr. Elizabeth True FEatURES V.P. for Operations Dr. Darrell W. Donahue 8 Money:Top Rankings Chief Financial Officer 18 Above & Beyond James Soucie WHEN YOU’RE ON THE JOB, IT’S IMPORTANT TO HAVE THE RIGHT TOOLS.
    [Show full text]
  • Mainedot Work Plan Calendar Years 2019-2020-2021 Maine Department of Transportation
    Maine State Library Digital Maine Transportation Documents Transportation 2-2019 MaineDOT Work Plan Calendar Years 2019-2020-2021 Maine Department of Transportation Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalmaine.com/mdot_docs Recommended Citation Maine Department of Transportation, "MaineDOT Work Plan Calendar Years 2019-2020-2021" (2019). Transportation Documents. 124. https://digitalmaine.com/mdot_docs/124 This Text is brought to you for free and open access by the Transportation at Digital Maine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Transportation Documents by an authorized administrator of Digital Maine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MaineDOT Work Plan Calendar Years 2019-2020-2021 February 2019 February 21, 2019 MaineDOT Customers and Partners: On behalf of the 2,000 valued employees of the Maine Department of Transportation (MaineDOT), I am privileged to present this 2019 Edition of our Work Plan for the three Calendar Years 2019, 2020 and 2021. Implementation of this plan allows us to achieve our mission of responsibly providing our customers with the safest and most reliable transportation system possible, given available resources. Like all recent editions, this Work Plan includes all capital projects and programs, maintenance and operations activities, planning initiatives, and administrative functions. This plan contains 2,193 individual work items with a total value of $2.44 billion, consisting principally of work to be delivered or coordinated through MaineDOT, but also including funding and work delivered by other transportation agencies that receive federal funds directly including airports and transit agencies. Although I have the pleasure of presenting this plan, it is really the product of staff efforts dating back to the summer of last year.
    [Show full text]
  • BUSINESS EQUIPMENT TAX REIMBURSEMENT, 2019 Application Year for Property Taxes Paid in Calendar Year 2018
    BUSINESS EQUIPMENT TAX REIMBURSEMENT, 2019 Application Year for Property Taxes Paid in Calendar Year 2018 Business Name City/Town State Refund HANNAFORD BROS CO, LLC SALISBURY NC 1,476,581 TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC DALLAS TX 1,448,799 BATH IRON WORKS CORP BATH ME 1,239,253 SAPPI NORTH AMERICA, INC BOSTON MA 1,137,983 NESTLE WATERS NORTH AMERICA INC POLAND ME 1,067,412 TWIN RIVERS PAPER COMPANY LLC MADAWASKA ME 675,695 MCCAIN FOODS USA, INC OAKBROOK TERRACE IL 589,008 UNITED RENTALS NORTH AMERICA INC SCOTTSDALE AZ 573,879 VERSO PAPER LLC MIAMISBURG OH 475,928 ND PAPER INC. OAKBROOK TERRACE IL 443,413 LL BEAN INC. FREEPORT ME 430,017 TAMBRANDS INC CINCINNATI OH 363,949 IRVING FOREST PRODUCTS INC SAINT JOHN NB 363,885 HUHTAMAKI INC DESOTO KS 361,692 WAL MART STORES EAST LP BENTONVILLE AR 342,135 IRVING OIL MARKETING INC ST JOHN NB 321,029 SUNBELT RENTALS INC FORT MILL SC 264,171 MACS CONVENIENCE STORES LLC AKRON OH 262,324 BARBER FOODS SPRINGDALE AR 257,395 THE DINGLEY PRESS INC LISBON ME 232,942 DRAGON PRODUCTS CO LLC SOUTH PORTLAND ME 229,800 ANDRO HYDRO LLC NESHKORO WI 224,014 FAIRCHILD SEMICONDUCTOR CORP PHOENIX AZ 206,711 C N BROWN COMPANY SOUTH PARIS ME 201,167 UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORP FARMINGTON CT 186,490 MID STATE MACHINE PRODUCTS INC WINSLOW ME 184,989 WOODLAND PULP LLC BAILEYVILLE ME 176,536 RENT A CENTER EAST INC PLANO TX 174,354 GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY SCHENECTADY NY 160,054 LEPAGE BAKERIES CEDAR STREET LLC AUBURN ME 150,441 HUBER ENGINEERED WOODS LLC EASTON ME 148,418 DUVALTEX (US) INC GUILFORD ME 141,356 AMERICARB INC ROSWELL
    [Show full text]
  • Edwards Agreement
    Agreement Reached to Remove Edwards Dam On May 26, 1998 along the banks of the Kennebec in Augusta, Maine, the Council joined in a celebration that we have been working toward for the past decade: an historic settlement agreement that will result in removal of the Edwards Dam next summer. It was a triumphant day for the Kennebec Coalition – comprised of the Natural Resources Council of Maine, American Rivers, Atlantic Salmon Federation, and Trout Unlimited – as well for individuals at the grassroots level and within several state and federal agencies who have shared our vision of removal of the Edwards Dam and restoration of the fisheries habitat of the Kennebec River. Governor Angus King served as the master of ceremonies as former Governor John McKernan, Interior Secretary Bruce Babbitt, Augusta Mayor John Bridge, Maine’s entire congressional delegation, the Council’s Executive Director Brownie Carson, one of the owners of the Edwards Dam, and several other officials each took a turn before the television cameras and microphones to extol the virtues of the settlement agreement and the value of removing the Edwards Dam. Never before had there been such a massive and unanimous show of support for the environmental benefits of removing the Edwards Dam – a cause that the Council and other river protection advocates have been advancing, often against tremendous opposition, for more than a decade. Fisheries biologists have estimated that populations of Atlantic sturgeon, the endangered shortnose sturgeon, striped bass, shad, alewives and other fish which spawn in fresh water but live primarily in the ocean will flourish as a result of getting access to 17 miles of prime breeding habitat between the current site of the Edwards dam and Waterville.
    [Show full text]
  • People in Nature: Environmental History of the Kennebec River, Maine Daniel J
    The University of Maine DigitalCommons@UMaine Electronic Theses and Dissertations Fogler Library 2003 People in Nature: Environmental History of the Kennebec River, Maine Daniel J. Michor Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/etd Part of the History Commons, Natural Resources Management and Policy Commons, Nature and Society Relations Commons, and the Sustainability Commons Recommended Citation Michor, Daniel J., "People in Nature: Environmental History of the Kennebec River, Maine" (2003). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 188. http://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/etd/188 This Open-Access Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. PEOPLE IN NATURE: ENVlRONMENTAL HISTORY OF THE KENNEBEC RIVER, MAINE BY Daniel J. Michor B.A. University of Wisconsin, 2000 A THESIS Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts (in History) The Graduate School The University of Maine May, 2003 Advisory Committee: Richard Judd, Professor of History, Advisor Howard Segal, Professor of History Stephen Hornsby, Professor of Anthropology Alexander Huryn, Associate Professor of Aquatic Entomology PEOPLE IN NATURE: ENVIRONMENTAL HISTORY OF THE KENNEBEC RIVER, MAINE By Daniel J. Michor Thesis Advisor: Dr. Richard Judd An Abstract of the Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts (in History) May, 2003 The quality of a river affects the tributaries, lakes, and estuary it feeds; it affects the wildlife and vegetation that depend on the river for energy, nutrients, and habitat, and also affects the human community in the form of use, access, pride, and sustainability.
    [Show full text]
  • Download 2020 Summer Activities Directory.Pdf
    2020 Summer Activities Fair Directory Provided by the Camden Rockport School Alliance 2016 Summer Activities Fair Directory 2020 DIRECTORY Provided by the Camden Rockport School Alliance IMPORTANT NOTE: All information was current as of 6/16/2020. Due to the ongoing situation with COVID-19 and changing recommendations from the CDC and local/state/national government, all information is subject to change. Please contact the organization directly to confirm camp info. Thank you. APPRENTICESHOP'S COMMUNITY SAILING Status for 2020: Modified program, starting July 6th Address: 655 Main Street, Rockland, Maine 04841 Phone: 207-594-1800 Website: www.apprenticeshop.org Facebook page: www.facebook.com/Apprenticeshop Age Group: No participants under 6 Hours: Half Day Sessions 9-12 and 1-4, may add evening and weekend offerings as summer continues Weeks Offered: July 6 - August 28, Some overnight courses TBD, Fall Afterschool Program Financial aid offered? Yes Sailors aged 13+ will have access to our fleet of sailing dinghies. They must pass a quick skills check before being allowed to sail and they are expected to have a partner to sail with (may be younger than 13) or even 2 friends, so long as the total crew weight is no less than 200lbs. Instructors will be there to assist, but not actively teach beginners, so pair up with a novice or ask a parent or family friend you feel comfortable with to come out! Later in the season we may add different boats, as well as theme days like racing, adventure, and skills refresher for beginners. Follow our social media and check our website for the latest info on other courses, such as overnights, workshops, partnerships, and adult sailing offerings.
    [Show full text]