DOCSLIB.ORG

Weekly Wireless Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Weekly Wireless Report WEEK ENDING AUGUST 30, 2013 Weekly Wireless Report INSIDE THIS ISSUE: This Week’s Stories THIS WEEK’S STORIES AT&T 'Extremely AT&T 'Extremely Disappointed' With FCC's Delay in Alltel Disappointed' With FCC's Purchase Review Delay in Alltel Purchase August 28, 2013 Review Sprint Plans to Use 2.5 GHz The FCC has stopped its review of AT&T Mobility's (NYSE:T) proposed $780 million purchase of Atlantic Tele-Network's retail wireless business, which still operates under the Alltel brand, arguing that Spectrum to Catch Up to AT&T has not provided enough information about how it will transition Alltel's remaining prepaid Verizon, AT&T in LTE customers to its network. U.S. Spy Agencies Spend $40 Billion On Data The FCC halted its informal 180-day "shot clock" for reviewing deals on day 175 of the review period. In a letter to AT&T, Ruth Milkman, the FCC's wireless bureau chief, wrote that the FCC in June had PRODUCTS & SERVICES requested information from AT&T regarding it plans to migrate Alltel customers. AT&T responded with information about moving postpaid customers to its network. However, Milkman wrote that so far, Apple's iPhone Trade-in despite several FCC follow-ups "about the importance of transitioning prepaid customers, we have Program Hits its Retail received no detailed responses from AT&T on its plans for transitioning ATN's significant prepaid Stores Today (Updated) customer base." EMERGING TECHNOLOGY As of the end of the second quarter, ATN counted around 591,000 U.S. retail wireless customers, of Huawei Has Already Placed which around 409,000 were postpaid subscribers and 182,000 were prepaid. Milkman wrote that the a Big Team to Work on 5G FCC will restart its shot-clock on the deal when AT&T provides the information it requested. ATN Technology operates the Alltel brand through a subsidiary called Allied Wireless. MERGERS & ACQUISITIONS "AT&T is extremely disappointed at the FCC delay today on this small transaction," Jim Cicconi, AT&T's senior executive vice president of external and legislative affairs, said in a statement. "AT&T is ready, Vodafone Seen as AT&T willing and able to make significant network investments in these rural territories to bring HSPA+ and Prey Amid $130 Billion LTE services to Allied's customers, an investment that will not occur but for this transaction. AT&T has Verizon Deal actively worked to address FCC concerns and will continue to work with the commission until all issues are resolved." INDUSTRY REPORTS Report: Tablet Market Under the deal, which was announced in January, AT&T would get wireless properties including Losing Uut to Wearables, licenses, network assets, retail stores and the Alltel subscribers. Specifically, AT&T will get spectrum in Larger Smartphones the 700 MHz, 850 MHz and 1900 MHz bands, which is largely complementary to AT&T's existing network. However, ATN's network uses CDMA technology so AT&T will need to covert the customers to Report: US App Makers its GSM network. Losing Share The Alltel network covers around 4.6 million people in primarily rural areas across Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, North Carolina, Ohio and South Carolina. In 2010, ATN purchased for $200 million Alltel assets divested by Verizon Wireless (NYSE:VZ) as part of Verizon's larger deal for Alltel. The delay in the review comes as the FCC begins considering AT&T's proposed acquisition of no- contract wireless carrier Leap Wireless (NASDAQ:LEAP). AT&T said in July it expects that deal to close within six to nine months. After the transaction closes, AT&T has said it expects to keep Leap's Cricket brand and distribution. www.fiercewireless.com P a g e | 2 Sprint Plans to Use 2.5 GHz Spectrum to Catch Up to Verizon, AT&T in LTE August 29, 2013 Sprint (NYSE:S) executives think that the company's nationwide deployment of Clearwire's 2.5 GHz spectrum will help it catch up to LTE market leaders Verizon Wireless (NYSE:VZ) and AT&T Mobility (NYSE:T), according to a financial analyst research note. As noted by Barron's, Wells Fargo Securities and investors met earlier this week with Sprint CEO Dan Hesse and CFO Joe Euteneuer, who provided more details and color on the company's Network Vision network modernization efforts, the first phase of which the carrier expects to complete by mid-2014 (as part of that, Sprint expects to cover 200 million POPs with LTE by year-end). The second phase will be the deployment of Clearwire's 2.5 GHz airwaves on a nationwide basis, and Sprint's management expects to reveal more details on that part of the company's plans "at some point in the not-too-distant future," according to note, written by Wells Fargo Securities analysts J. Davis Herbert and Eric Fishel. Sprint disclosed in July that it plans to deploy Clearwire's 2.5 GHz spectrum using TD-LTE on all 38,000 of its planned Network Vision cell sites in a nationwide rollout. And, due to the weaker propagation characteristics of 2.5 GHz, Sprint will also deploy small cells and other sites beyond the 38,000 Network Vision sites. Previously, Sprint had said it would use Clearwire's spectrum as a "hotspot" LTE network to offload traffic in urban markets. In markets where Sprint has fully deployed new multimode base stations as part of Network Vision, such as Chicago, Sprint is reporting fewer dropped and blocked calls, improved performance for voice and dramatically faster data speeds. Yet Sprint remains behind its rivals in LTE coverage for its 1900 MHz FDD-LTE network (Sprint plans to deploy LTE on 800 MHz spectrum starting in the third quarter). Verizon now covers 301 million POPs with LTE. By the end of the year, AT&T plans to cover 270 million POPs with LTE, up from around 225 million now, and T-Mobile US (NYSE:TMUS) plans to cover at least 200 million POPs with LTE, up from 157 million now. According to the note, Hesse said Verizon has "the best network in the industry and it has paid off enormously." Sprint hopes to catch up over the next several years by offering the "best network in the world." The Sprint executives said tests have shown that once Sprint is through its entire overhaul, its network speeds will be "blazing fast." (Clearwire executives have said in the past that, using carrier aggregation technology, the company could offer theoretical peak speeds of up to 168 Mbps in 2014 on LTE using its spectrum.) Upon completion of Sprint's network overhaul, Sprint expects 90 percent of its backhaul to be driven by Ethernet over fiber and the remaining over microwave. Looking ahead in terms of capital expenditures, Sprint expects to spend around $8 billion in 2013, $8 billion in 2014, and then $6 billion per year from 2015 to 2017. The company is also still open to network sharing, depending on the economics. The research note fleshes out some comments Sprint executives made in July. Hesse said on the company's second-quarter earnings conference call in late July that the deployment of a nationwide LTE network on 2.5 GHz will help give Sprint "competitive parity" with its rivals. "And the important thing in terms of what we believe will be a better, a superior network experience will depend upon how quickly we roll out the 2.5 [GHz spectrum], because that will give us extraordinary capacity and some speed and performance advantages in the market," he said. Analysts think the deployment will help Sprint, but that it will take time to translate into material results for the company. "TBR believes Sprint will keep the TD-LTE network and will use it to improve its existing FDD-LTE network," TBR analyst Eric Costa wrote in a research note last month. "The acquisition of Clearwire greatly improved Sprint's position in the wireless market, yet the operator is unlikely to gain market share from AT&T and Verizon until at least 2015 as Sprint invests to build out its network over the newly acquired spectrum." Sprint also said it is continuing to notify customers it acquired through the May 2013 deal with U.S. Cellular (NYSE:USM), that it plans to begin shutting down affected portions of the U.S. Cellular network. P a g e | 3 The shutdown will take effect for the St. Louis metropolitan area, including parts of Missouri and Illinois, on Oct. 31. Sprint plans to reuse the spectrum it acquired in those markets to enhance its network, and Sprint has warned affected customers that their service will be interrupted if they do not move their service to Sprint or another carrier before the change. www.fiercewireless.com U.S. Spy Agencies Spend $40 Billion On Data August 30, 2013 Top-secret budget figures detailing the vast operations of U.S. spy agencies reveal not only the agencies' expansive reach, but also the massive size of their enterprise IT and data processing capabilities. The figures, provided by former National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden and published Aug. 30 by the Washington Post, provide a glimpse into the money the CIA, the NSA and the intelligence community as a whole spend annually to collect, process and analyze data. The budget figures, from a top-secret report called the Fiscal 2013 Congressional Budget Justification Book, show that the U.S. budgeted $52.6 billion in fiscal 2013 to support the operations of 16 intelligence agencies, including $14.7 billion for the CIA, $10.8 billion for the NSA and $10.3 billion for the National Reconnaissance Office.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Access, Broadband Video and Data, Internet Protocol Network Services, Network Access, Long Distance, and Other Services
    Federal Communications Commission FCC 12-95 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Applications of Cellco Partnership d/b/a ) WT Docket No. 12-4 Verizon Wireless and SpectrumCo LLC and Cox ) TMI, LLC For Consent To Assign AWS-1 ) Licenses ) ) Applications of Verizon Wireless and Leap for ) ULS File Nos. 0004942973, 0004942992, Consent To Exchange Lower 700 MHz, AWS-1, ) 0004952444, 0004949596, and 0004949598 and PCS Licenses ) ) Applications of T-Mobile License LLC and Cellco ) WT Docket 12-175 Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless for Consent to ) Assign Licenses ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER AND DECLARATORY RULING Adopted: August 21, 2012 Released: August 23, 2012 By the Commission: Chairman Genachowski and Commissioners Clyburn and Rosenworcel issuing separate statements; Commissioners McDowell and Pai approving in part, concurring in part and issuing separate statements. TABLE OF CONTENTS Heading Paragraph # I. INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................................. 1 II. BACKGROUND.................................................................................................................................... 7 A. Description of Applicants ................................................................................................................ 8 1. Verizon Wireless ....................................................................................................................... 8 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards Quadruple-Play Service: Both Individual and Household Level Analyses on Mobile Bundle
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Yu, Eun; Jung, Jaemin Conference Paper Towards Quadruple-Play Service: Both Individual and Household Level Analyses on Mobile Bundle 29th European Regional Conference of the International Telecommunications Society (ITS): "Towards a Digital Future: Turning Technology into Markets?", Trento, Italy, 1st - 4th August, 2018 Provided in Cooperation with: International Telecommunications Society (ITS) Suggested Citation: Yu, Eun; Jung, Jaemin (2018) : Towards Quadruple-Play Service: Both Individual and Household Level Analyses on Mobile Bundle, 29th European Regional Conference of the International Telecommunications Society (ITS): "Towards a Digital Future: Turning Technology into Markets?", Trento, Italy, 1st - 4th August, 2018, International Telecommunications Society (ITS), Calgary This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/184972 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte.
    [Show full text]
  • T-Mobile Complaint
    Case 1:20-cv-10998 Document 1 Filed 05/22/20 Page 1 of 37 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS CHICAGO INSTRUCTIONAL TECHNOLOGY FOUNDATION, INC., DENVER AREA EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONSORTIUM, INC., INSTRUCTIONAL Case No. __________________ TELECOMMUNICATIONS FOUNDATION, INC., NORTH AMERICAN CATHOLIC EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMMING JURY TRIAL REQUESTED FOUNDATION, INC., PORTLAND REGIONAL EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION, TWIN CITIES SCHOOLS’ TELECOMMUNICATIONS GROUP, INC., Plaintiffs, v. CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS II LLC, CLEARWIRE LEGACY LLC f/k/a CLEARWIRE CORPORATION, T-MOBILE US, INC., Defendants. COMPLAINT Plaintiffs Chicago Instructional Technology Foundation, Inc., Denver Area Educational Telecommunications Consortium, Inc., Instructional Telecommunications Foundation, Inc., North American Catholic Educational Programming Foundation, Inc., Portland Regional Educational Telecommunications Corporation, and Twin Cities Schools’ Telecommunications Group, Ind. by and through their undersigned attorneys, allege upon personal knowledge and belief as follows: NATURE OF THE ACTION 1. Plaintiffs seek injunctive relief to stop Defendants from unlawfully pirating their spectrum and damages from Defendant T-Mobile US, Inc. (“T-Mobile”) for its wrongful taking of Case 1:20-cv-10998 Document 1 Filed 05/22/20 Page 2 of 37 that spectrum. Plaintiffs are six nonprofit organizations that have been granted more than 60 licenses by the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) to operate Educational Broadband Service (“EBS”) channels in the 2.5 GHz spectrum band for educational purposes in markets across the country. In furtherance of their educational purposes, Plaintiffs agreed in July 2006 to lease their excess EBS spectrum capacity (“Spectrum”) to Defendants Clearwire Spectrum Holdings II LLC and Clearwire Legacy LLC (together, “Clearwire”) for commercial use over a thirty-year term.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Securities and Exchange Commission Washington, D
    “We recognized that a shift was occuring in consumer mindset from some of the extravagances of the previous few years to a focus on value.” 1 Virgin Mobile USA 2008 Annual Report 2008 WAS A TRANSFORMATIONAL YEAR AT VIRGIN MOBILE USA. In late 2007 we began to see early signs of the global recession in our customer base. As gas prices began to rise and budgets tightened, our customers cut back on their mobile usage in order to optimize spending. We recognized that a shift was occuring in consumer mindset from some of the extravagances of the previous few years to a focus on value. At Virgin Mobile USA, we have always focused on providing value and fl exibility to our customers, allowing them to change plans according to their budgetary needs so they can get the most from their wireless service. We realized that now more than ever, we needed to emphasize our value proposition and focus our message on the value we off er to consumers. And so we began to implement a number of strategic and operational initiatives in 2008 that focused on value – on the value we bring to consumers, as well as putting the right operational initiatives in place to build shareholder value. Virgin Mobile USA 2008 Annual Report 2 1. CHANGE THE DIRECTION OF OUR HEADLINE NUMBERS 2. DRAMATICALLY IMPROVE OUR COST STRUCTURE 3. OFFER OUR CUSTOMERS A FULL SUITE OF SERVICES, INCLUDING A POSTPAID PRODUCT 4. IMPROVE OUR BALANCE SHEET AND LIQUIDITY As many of our customers had reduced their usage 2008. These initiatives showed an immediate impact due to the emerging economic challenges, we began in the third quarter, helping to improve our gross add 2008 with negative trend lines in many metrics, trend lines from a decline of 10% year over year in including revenues, customer acquisition and Adjusted Q1, to positive 8% growth in Q3 and fl at gross adds in Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Q4 within a diffi cult retail environment.
    [Show full text]
  • AMÉRICA MÓVIL, S.A.B. DE C.V. (Exact Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter)
    As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 24, 2017 UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, DC 20549 FORM 20-F Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 Commission file number: 1-16269 AMÉRICA MÓVIL, S.A.B. DE C.V. (exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) America Mobile (translation of registrant’s name into English) United Mexican States (jurisdiction of incorporation) Lago Zurich 245, Plaza Carso / Edificio Telcel, Colonia Ampliación Granada, Delegación Miguel Hidalgo, 11529, Mexico City, México (address of principal executive offices) Daniela Lecuona Torras, Telephone: (5255) 2581-4449, E-mail: [email protected] Facsimile: (5255) 2581-4422, Lago Zurich 245, Plaza Carso / Edificio Telcel, Piso 16, Colonia Ampliación Granada, Delegación Miguel Hidalgo, 11529, Mexico City, México (name, telephone, e-mail and/or facsimile number and address of company contact person) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of each class: Name of each exchange on which registered: A Shares, without par value New York Stock Exchange L Shares, without par value New York Stock Exchange 5.625% Notes Due 2017 New York Stock Exchange 5.000% Senior Notes Due 2019 New York Stock Exchange 5.000% Senior Notes Due 2020 New York Stock Exchange 3.125% Senior Notes Due 2022 New York Stock Exchange 6.375% Notes Due 2035 New York Stock Exchange 6.125% Notes Due 2037 New York Stock Exchange
    [Show full text]
  • Wireless Emergency Alerts Mobile Penetration Strategy
    WIRELESS EMERGENCY ALERTS MOBILE PENETRATION STRATEGY August 2013 Task Lead Daniel Gonzales Task Staff Edward Balkovich Brian Jackson Jan Osburg Andrew Parker Evan Saltzman Ricardo Sanchez Shoshana Shelton Chuck Stelzner Dulani Woods Henry H. Willis Director, Homeland Security and Defense Center National Defense Research Institute Jack Riley Vice President and Director, National Security Research Division Director, National Defense Research Institute Acknowledgments The National Defense Research Institute, a division of the RAND Corporation, performed this analysis for the Department of Homeland Security Science and Technology Directorate. The NDRI team extends its deep appreciation to members of the emergency response and wireless communications communities for their cooperation, information, and feedback; their contributions are the foundation of this report. Further, the NDRI team offers its gratitude to the emergency responders whose dedication and commitment ensure the safety of our families, our communities, and our nation. This report is a tribute to their service. In addition, we would like to extend our appreciation for constructive peer reviews provided by Marvin Sirbu of Carnegie Mellon University and by David Senty. NDRI Publication Number: PR-594-OSD iii Preface The objective of this analysis, performed for the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Science and Technology Directorate, was to independently assess the coverage and penetration of the Wireless Emergency Alert (WEA) system, and to offer recommendations to improve the availability, coverage, and penetration of WEA to the U.S. public. The intended audience of this report is U.S. government decision makers; commercial mobile service providers; mobile wireless device manufacturers; and federal, state, local, and tribal alert originators.
    [Show full text]
  • HNI Entity 310-010 Verizon Wireless 310-012 Verizon
    HNI Entity 310-010 Verizon Wireless 310-012 Verizon Wireless 310-013 Verizon Wireless 310-014 TEST IMSI HNI 310-016 Cricket Communications 310-020 Union Telephone Company 310-030 AT&T Mobility 310-035 ETEX Communications, LP (d/b/a) ETEX Wireless 310-050 Alaska Communications 310-060 Consolidated Telcom 310-070 AT&T Mobility 310-080 AT&T Mobility 310-090 Cricket Communications, LLC 310-100 New Mexico RSA 4 East Limited Partnership 310-110 Pacific Telecom Inc. 310-120 SPRINTCOM, INC. 310-130 Carolina West Wireless 310-140 GTA Wireless LLC 310-150 AT&T Mobility 310-160 T-Mobile USA 310-170 AT&T Mobility 310-180 West Central Wireless 310-190 Alaska Wireless Communications, LLC 310-200 T-Mobile USA 310-210 T-Mobile USA 310-220 T-Mobile USA 310-230 T-Mobile USA 310-240 T-Mobile USA 310-250 T-Mobile USA 310-260 T-Mobile USA 310-270 T-Mobile USA 310-280 AT&T Mobility 310-290 NEP Cellcorp, Inc. 310-300 Blanca Telephone Company 310-310 T-Mobile USA 310-320 Smith Bagley, Inc. dba CellularOne 310-330 Wireless Partners LLC 310-340 Limitless Mobile, LLC 310-350 Verizon Wireless 310-360 Cellular Network Partnership dba Pioneer Cellular 310-370 Docomo Pacific, Inc. 310-380 AT&T Mobility 310-390 TX-11 Acquisition, LLC 310-400 Wave Runner LLC 310-410 AT&T Mobility 310-420 Cincinnati Bell Wireless, LLC 310-430 GCI Communications Corp 310-440 Numerex Corp 310-450 North East Cellular Inc. 310-460 Newcore Wireless 310-470 Sprint 310-480 Wave Runner LLC 310-490 T-Mobile USA 310-500 Public Service Cellular, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Memorandum Opinion and Order, Declaratory Ruling, and Order on Reconsideration
    Federal Communications Commission FCC 13-92 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Applications of SOFTBANK CORP., Starburst II, ) IB Docket No. 12-343 Inc., Sprint Nextel Corporation, and Clearwire ) Corporation ) ) For Consent to Transfer Control of Licenses and ) Authorizations ) ) Petitions for Reconsideration of Applications of ) ULS File Nos. 0005480932, et al. Clearwire Corporation for Pro Forma Transfer of ) Control ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER, DECLARATORY RULING, AND ORDER ON RECONSIDERATION Adopted: July 3, 2013 Released: July 5, 2013 By the Commission: Acting Chairwoman Clyburn and Commissioner Pai issuing separate statements. TABLE OF CONTENTS Heading Paragraph # I. INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................................. 1 II. BACKGROUND.................................................................................................................................... 5 A. Description of the Applicants .......................................................................................................... 5 1. SoftBank Corp. and Starburst II, Inc......................................................................................... 5 2. Sprint Nextel Corporation ......................................................................................................... 8 3. Clearwire Corporation............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Essential Guide to Telecommunications, Sixth Edition
    PRAISE FOR THE ESSENTIAL GUIDE TO TELECOMMUNICATIONS, SIXTH EDITION “Dodd’s The Essential Guide to Telecommunications provides the history and context that make a fundamental underpinning of modern business more accessible to technologists and businesspeople alike. This new edition of her primer is an essential reference in the continuously evolving communica- tions landscape.” —Tom Hopcroft, President and CEO, Mass Technology Leadership Council “Annabel Dodd’s book is a clear guide and big-picture view of technologies and industries. It is an up-to-date guide for anyone who wants to be familiar with important innovations and key technologies. This is truly an industry bible for mobile, Internet, and networking services.” —Hiawatha Bray, Technology Reporter, The Boston Globe “Ms. Dodd’s aptly titled The Essential Guide to Telecommunications has been my bible for all things telecom since my days as an AT&T transmission network engineer nearly twenty years ago. Exhaus- tively and meticulously researched, concisely written for lay folks and techs/engineers alike, this book aids me in my current role as an IT Support Technician II when discussing new technology with our telecommunications department. Thank you to Ms. Dodd for keeping us all current!” —Todd Garbarini, IT Support Technician II Commvault Systems, Inc. “The Essential Guide to Telecommunications is probably one of the most useful and well-written books on our telecom bookshelf. Annabel Z. Dodd does a great job of capturing a snapshot of the current telecom industry. Even those with little or no technical training should be able to understand the text. This is the perfect book for salespeople who want to learn more about the products and services they are selling, or for those who just want to keep up to date on the latest in telecom technology.” —William Van Hefner, President, Vantek Communications, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • 12/FINAL Working Party on Telecommunication And
    Unclassified DSTI/ICCP/TISP(2005)12/FINAL Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Economiques Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 07-Apr-2006 ___________________________________________________________________________________________ English - Or. English DIRECTORATE FOR SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND INDUSTRY COMMITTEE FOR INFORMATION, COMPUTER AND COMMUNICATIONS POLICY Unclassified DSTI/ICCP/TISP(2005)12/FINAL Working Party on Telecommunication and Information Services Policies MULTIPLE PLAY: PRICING AND POLICY TRENDS English - Or. English JT03207142 Document complet disponible sur OLIS dans son format d'origine Complete document available on OLIS in its original format DSTI/ICCP/TISP(2005)12/FINAL FOREWORD This report was presented to the Working Party on Telecommunication and Information Services Policies in December 2005 and was declassified by the Committee for Information, Computer and Communications Policy in March 2006. The report was prepared by Mr. Yoshikazu Okamoto and Mr. Taylor Reynolds of the OECD’s Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry. It is published under the responsibility of the Secretary- General of the OECD. © OECD/OCDE 2006 2 DSTI/ICCP/TISP(2005)12/FINAL TABLE OF CONTENTS MAIN POINTS.............................................................................................................................................. 6 Regulatory issues........................................................................................................................................ 7 INTRODUCTION
    [Show full text]
  • The Technology, Media and Telecommunications Review
    The Technology, Media and Telecommunications Review Fourth Edition Editor John P Janka Law Business Research The Technology, Media and Telecommunications Review Reproduced with permission from Law Business Research Ltd. This article was first published in The Technology, Media and Telecommunications Review, 4th edition (published in October 2013 – editor John P Janka). For further information please email [email protected] The Technology, Media and Telecommunications Review Fourth Edition Editor John P Janka Law Business Research Ltd THE LAW REVIEWS THE MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS REVIEW THE RESTRUCTURING REVIEW THE PRIVATE COmpetITION ENFORCEMENT REVIEW THE DISPUTE RESOLUTION REVIEW THE EMPLOYMENT LAW REVIEW THE PUBLIC COmpetITION ENFORCEMENT REVIEW THE BANKING REGULATION REVIEW THE INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION REVIEW THE MERGER CONTROL REVIEW THE TECHNOLOGY, MEDIA AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS REVIEW THE INWARD INVESTMENT AND INTERNATIONAL TAXATION REVIEW THE CORPORATE GOVERNANCE REVIEW THE CORPORATE IMMIGRATION REVIEW THE INTERNATIONAL INVESTIGATIONS REVIEW THE PROJECTS AND CONSTRUCTION REVIEW THE INTERNATIONAL CAPITAL MARKETS REVIEW THE REAL ESTATE LAW REVIEW THE PRIVATE EQUITY REVIEW THE ENERGY REGULATION AND MARKETS REVIEW THE INTELLECTUAL PROpertY REVIEW THE ASSET MANAGEMENT REVIEW THE PRIVATE WEALTH AND PRIVATE CLIENT REVIEW THE MINING LAW REVIEW THE EXECUTIVE REMUNERATION REVIEW THE ANTi-BRIBERY AND ANTi-CORRUPTION REVIEW THE CArtelS AND LENIENCY REVIEW THE TAX DISPUTES AND LITIGATION REVIEW THE LIFE SCIENCES LAW REVIEW THE INSURANCE
    [Show full text]
  • Download (PDF)
    FEDERAL REGULATION AND COMPETITIVE ACCESS TO MULTIPLE-UNIT PREMISES: MORE CHOICE IN COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES? LYNNE HOLT* & MARK JAMISON** I. INTRODUCTION The nature of competition in the United States’ communications sector changed significantly over the past two decades. Before the 1990s, ‘‘competition’’ referred to the fight among providers of discrete services, such as the contest among AT&T, MCI, and Sprint over the long- distance slice of the communications pie. Today, competition is much more likely to describe the fight over the entire pie, among firms offering a ‘‘triple play’’ of services----high-speed Internet service, video, and t e l e p h o n y ----over a single broadband platform. Some firms recently expanded the pie with a ‘‘quadruple play’’ that includes wireless services as well. Cable operators, traditional wireline telephone companies, and, increasingly, wireless providers are competing to offer consumers both the underlying broadband platform and various bundled services that ride across it. However, not all consumers benefit from this competition in like manner.1 Public policy deliberations tend to focus more on differences in access to communications services either between consumers in rural and * Dr. Lynne Holt, Policy Analyst, Public Utility Research Center, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-7142, [email protected]. ** Dr. Mark A. Jamison, Director, Public Utility Research Center, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-7142, [email protected]. The authors appreciate the review by Mr. William Cox, Able Band Chartered, and his suggestions for improving an earlier version of this paper. 1. For example, the staff of the New York Public Service Commission found differences between geographic areas in terms of the competitive alternatives that customers enjoyed.
    [Show full text]