DOCSLIB.ORG

Yasuichi Kitamura ([email protected]) APAN Tokyo XP Object of This Session

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Yasuichi Kitamura (Kita@Jp.Apan.Net) APAN Tokyo XP Object of This Session APAN 101 Yasuichi Kitamura ([email protected]) APAN Tokyo XP Object of this session Introduction of the organization of this meeting Explanation of some terminologies Encourage of joining some unknown sessions APAN 101 23nd APAN Meeting in Manila January 22nd, 2007 Agenda APAN Research and Education Network Snapshot of this meeting APAN 101 23nd APAN Meeting in Manila January 22nd, 2007 Asia-Pacific Advanced Network APAN Organization History APAN APAN meeting APAN 101 23nd APAN Meeting in Manila January 22nd, 2007 APAN Organization Coordinating Committee Secretariat Committees Working Groups Regional Net Groups http://www.apan.net/home/aboutapan/organization.html APAN 101 23nd APAN Meeting in Manila January 22nd, 2007 Coordinating Committee Chair: Shigeki Goto Vice Chairs: Jianping Wu, George McLaughlin, Lawrence Wong Treasurer: DaeYoung Kim Secretariat Managing Director: Wanchai Rivepiboon Committees NOC Kazunori Konishi Grid Committee Kento Aida Backbone Committee George McLaughlin Strategy Committee Lawrence Wong Fellowship Committee Rahmat Budhiarto CCIRN Xing Li Event Committee Akira Mizushima Program Francis Lee Election Committee George McLaughlin Training Committee Kanchana Kanchanasut IPv6 Task Force Coordination: Jianping Wu WG: Yan Ma, Hiroshi Esaki, Seung Yun Lee Operation: Xing Li, Yoshinori Kitatsuji, Jaehwa Lee Application: Nan Kai, Hiroshi Easki, Yo-Jung Kim APAN 101 23nd APAN Meeting in Manila January 22nd, 2007 Working Groups Application Network Sures Network Research Natural Resource Chris Elvidge, Koji Okamura Jun Matsukata Technology Area Technology Area Ramadaswaran Group Area Pisuth Paiboonrat Suhaimi Napis, Medical WG Shuji Shimizu IPv6 WG Yan Ma Agriculture WG Byong-Lyol Lee Chris Elvidge, Earth Monitoring HDTV WG Jongwon Kim Measurement WG Yasuichi Kitamura Pakorn Apaphant, WG Hiromichi Fukui Jai-Ho Oh, Yihui eScience WG HingYan Lee Satellite WG Lim Seow San Earth System WG Ding Middleware WG Yasuo Okabe Security WG Rahmat Budiarto Jysoo Lee, Lambda BoF Akira Kato SIP H323 WG Stephen Kingham Regional Net Groups North Asia Net Group DaeYong Kim South East Asia Net Group Lawrence Wong South Asia Net Group Hakkikur Rahman Oceania Net Group George McLauglin APAN Members Primary Members AU, BD, CN, HK, IN, JP, KR, MY, PH, SG, TW, LK, PK, TH, NZ Associate Members TransPAC/Indiana University, US Pacific Consortium, MOST Thailand, ITB, NREN(Nepal) Liaison Members CANARIE, CLARA, DANTE, Internet2, TERENA Affiliate Members ACFA, APBioNet, SDLEARN, APNG, APNIC, APRU, CGIAR, IDRC, NIIT, National Grid Office, PRAGMA Industry Members Juniper, Cisco APAN 101 23nd APAN Meeting in Manila January 22nd, 2007 History of APAN AP-net 1996.3.28 Dr. Goldstein provided the informal announce of the idea of “HPIIS”. 1996.5.8 The first core member meeting of AP-net. 1996.5.23-24 The first international meeting of AP-net. Prof. Chon became the chair. 1996.6.18-22 Asia-Pacific Advanced Network project was proposed by Prof. McRobbie. The first APAN meeting was held. APAN 101 23nd APAN Meeting in Manila January 22nd, 2007 Preparation of APAN 1996.7.26-27 2nd APAN meeting was held in Tokyo. 1996.8.23-24 APAN working groups meeting was in Seoul. 1996.11.8-9 APAN workshop was held in Tokyo. The next generation Internet projects were introduced. 1997.3.13-21 APAN visited the NOC facilities in North America. 1997.5.15 The project of “High Performance International Internet Service” was announced by NSF. 1997.6.2-3 APAN started. Prof. Kilnam Chon(KAIST) became the chair. APAN 101 23nd APAN Meeting in Manila January 22nd, 2007 APAN met with USA. 1997.7.19-20 APAN attended the meeting with Indiana University about HPIIS link. TransPAC was developed for the name of the HPIIS link. APAN 101 23nd APAN Meeting in Manila January 22nd, 2007 AIII-JP AIII-HK AIII-ID AIII-TH 1996 AIII-JP APAN-JP AIII-HK AIII-ID AIII-TH APAN-SG 1998.1 AIII-JP APAN-JP AIII-HK AIII-ID AIII-TH APAN-PH APAN-SG 1998.2 APAN-KR AIII-JP APAN-JP USA AIII-HK AIII-ID AIII-TH APAN-PH APAN-SG APAN-AU 1998.6 APAN-KR APAIII-MYAN-MY AIII-JP APAN-JP USA AIII-ID AIII-TH APAN-PH APAN-SG APAN-AU 1999.9 APAN-KR APAIII-MYAN-MY APAN-CN APAN-JP USA AIII-ID APAIII-THAN-TH APAN-PH APAN-SG APAN-AU 2000.12 Russia EU APAN-IN APAN-KR Canada Vietnam APAN-CN APAN-JP US APAN-HK Latin America APAN-TW APAN-TH APAN-MY APAN-PH Nepal Internet Indonesia APAN-SG APAN-AU APAN-PK APAN-BD APAN-LK APAN-NZ History of APAN meeting 1996 Seoul Tokyo 1997 Tokyo Singapore 1998 Tsukuba Seoul 1999 Osaka Canberra 2000 Tsukuba Beijing 2001 Honolulu Penang 2002 Phuket Shanghai 2003 Fukuoka Busan 2004 Honolulu Cairns 2005 Bangkok Taipei 2006 Tokyo Singapore 2007 Manila Xi’An 2008 Honolulu (NewZealand) 2009 Kaohsiung Research and Education Network Research and Education Network APAN network US R&E networks Abilene, Internet2 Network European R&E networks GEANT2 TEIN2 APAN 101 23nd APAN Meeting in Manila January 22nd, 2007 Europe Europa Data Courtesy CIA World Book 0 300 km 0 300 mi GEANT2 KREONET KOREN CSTNET CERNET AIII 755 mi / 1220 km 1 inch 297 mi / 480 km 1 cm AARNET Canada CA*net4 United States Abilene 0 300 600 km 0 300 600 miles redCLARA/WHREN Europe Europa Data Courtesy CIA World Book 0 300 km 0 300 mi GEANT2 Massive increase in International connectivity 31 Copyright © AARNet 2005 APAN Network APAN Network consists of several network projects. TransPAC2, APII, Gloriad, NICT, SINET, JGN II, MAFFIN, AIII, TEIN2, NCC, AARNET3, Pacificwave The next slide shows APAN Network. The links shown there are shared with some multiple R&E communities. If the link is used just by domestic users and not shared with other communities, the link is not appeared in it. APAN 101 23nd APAN Meeting in Manila January 22nd, 2007 Abilene TransPAC2 Gloriad SINET TEIN2 JGNII JP KREONET2 APAN-JP CSTNET KOREN WIDE CERNET AIII-JP Hawaii Univ. CUHK Temasek AARNet3 Poly HARNET SingAREN ASNet NREN TWAREN USM ITB AIT PREGINET ThaiSARN IOIT INHERENT Uninet ThaiREN MYREN VINAREN GEANT2 TEIN2 TEIN2 TEIN2 ERNET SG HK BJ US R& E network - some history- Some R&E Network History Two reoccurring themes R&E Networks Growth and then Divide For a Network, Geography is Destiny Copyright © 2003 Juniper Networks, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential www.juniper.net35 ARPANET . 1969 – 1990 . Funded by ARPA . Connected Universities, Federally Funded and Private Research Labs, and DoD Labs and other Facilities . 1983 • Cutover from NCP to TCP/IP • ARPANET split into ARPANET and MILNET Copyright © 2003 Juniper Networks, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential www.juniper.net36 ARPANET 1969 ARPANET December 1969 From ARPANET Completion Report, BBN, 1978 Copyright © 2003 Juniper Networks, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential www.juniper.net37 ARPANET 1977 ARPANET July 1977 From ARPANET Completion Report, BBN, 1978 Copyright © 2003 Juniper Networks, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential www.juniper.net38 NSFnet . 1985 – 1995 . Started of connecting 5 Supercomputer Centers with 56K links • JvNSC, SDSC, NCSA, CTC, PSC, NCAR . Grew to connect Universities and Regional Nets and moved up to T1 . Served as the Internet’s backbone . 1995 • Internet is served by multiple commercial backbones • NSF shuts the NSFnet down Copyright © 2003 Juniper Networks, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential www.juniper.net39 NSFNET 1986 Copyright © 2003 Juniper Networks, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential www.juniper.net40 NSFNET T1 NSFnet 1986–1995 56Kbps - T3 (45Mbps) Copyright © 2003 Juniper Networks, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential www.juniper.net41 vBNS/vBNS+ . 1995 – Today . vBNS comes up the day the NSFnet goes ofine • Connects 5 Supercomputer Centers: CTC, NCAR, NCSA, PSC, and SDSC • And 4 NAPS: Ameritech, MFS, PacBell, Sprint . 1997 • vBNS’ role expanded to include service to the Top 100 US Research Universities . 2000+ • NSF grants a 3 year extension of the vBNS project on a no cost (to NSF) basis • vBNS+ provides research VPNs for various Federal Agencies Copyright © 2003 Juniper Networks, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential www.juniper.net42 vBNS 1995 vBNS 1995 Served only Supercomputer Centers Copyright © 2003 Juniper Networks, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential www.juniper.net43 vBNS Logical Map Copyright © 2003 Juniper Networks, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential www.juniper.net44 Abilene Abilene . 1999 – Today . 1999 • Abilene begins nationwide operations in January • Abilene’s role is to serve > 200 Internet2 Member Universities . 2000 • Abilene modifies its charter to allow it to serve a larger community including K-12 schools . 2002 • Abilene upgrades its backbone to OC-192 speeds . 2003 • Demonstrations are filling the OC-192s. Abilene observatory allows researchers to study the network. Use of IPv6 increases. Copyright © 2003 Juniper Networks, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential www.juniper.net46 !"#$%&%'()*+, Abilene Network – 99.9978% Uptime 5 Steve Cotter http://abilene.internet2.edu/files/Abilene-logical-map-2006.pdf Internet2 Network Detailed Layer 1 Topology Seattle 1000 Denny Way Pacific Northwest GP Level 3 2001 6th Ave Westin Bldg Albany Riet Cleveland Portland 316 N Cambridge Oregon GP TFN Portland 4000 Chester Syracuse Pearl NOX 707 SW Washington 300 Bent St Qwest 1335 NW Northrop Chicago Level 3 Level 3 Level 3 CIC/MREN Rochester Level 3 MERIT BOREAS Buffalo Bois Hartford Internet2 New York 710 N 111 8th New York Tionest Lakeshore Detroit Level 3 NYSERNET Starlight 32 Ave of the Chicago Americas Ogden Rawli Oma 600 W Chicago Philadelphia Eure Level 3 MC via 1075 Triangle Ct Ren ns ha Pittsburgh MAGPI ka Ediso Sacramento Pittsburgh 401 N Broad GP Level 3 Oakland Indianapolis 143 S 25th via 1005 N B St 1902 S East Washington Salt Lake CincinnatiLevel 3 San Francisco Inter-Mountain GP Denver St MAX Front Range GP Level 3 1755 Old Meadow 572 S DeLong Level 3 Level 3 1850 Pearl Louisville Sunnyvale Level 3 Kansas City St.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Internet2: a Comparative Study and Technological Solution to Achieve High Speed Networks
    Himanshu Agarwal / Indian Journal of Computer Science and Engineering Vol 1 No 3, 157-160 INTERNET2: A COMPARATIVE STUDY AND TECHNOLOGICAL SOLUTION TO ACHIEVE HIGH SPEED NETWORKS HIMANSHU AGARWAL Department of Computer Science & Information Technology, Moradabad Institute of Technology, Moradabad-244001 (Uttar Pradesh), India Email: [email protected] Abstract In current Indian scenario whenever it is required to access very large amount of data such as games or some commercial applications through commodity internet (internet1), speed becomes hurdle. It becomes tolerable for some applications but no one wants to bother in case of education and research. Now the world becomes commercialized and don’t want to bother with speed. Therefore the next generation of Internet infrastructure known as Internet2 or UCAID (University Corporation for Advance Internet Development) for 21st century comes in the focus of scientists, to improve quality of life through research and education. In this paper thorough analysis and comparative study of various educational networks, market scenario and Internet2 has been done, so all pros and cons become visualized to get the effect of internet2 in industries, research and development. Keywords: Internet2; Abilene network; gigapops; high speed networks. 1. Introduction Internet2 is a second generation network serving universities and research institutes by moving the data at a rate of 10 gigabits per second and more ,compared with 5.1 or so megabits old fashioned commodity internet. Internet2 moves data 100 to 1,000 times faster than internet1. Its GigaPoPs (points of presence) provide regional high-performance aggregation points; for member institutions, typically local campus networks provide no less than 100 Mbps to the desktop.
    [Show full text]
  • Ipv6 in Esnet
    SLAC-PUB-8902 IPv6 in ESnet Warren Matthews, Principal Network Specialist, Stanford Linear Accelerator Center (SLAC) Bob Fink, Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) Research Staff, Co-chair NGtrans WG, IETF and Project Lead for the 6bone Project, IETF. Susan Hicks, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) Vyto Grigaliunas, Network Analyst, Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (FNAL) Abstract The importance of the Internet to modern High Energy Physics collaborators is clearly immense, and understanding how new developments in network technology impact net- works is critical to the future design of experiments. The next generation Internet Protocol (IPv6) is being deployed on testbeds and pro- duction networks throughout the world. The protocol has been designed to solve todays internet problems, and many of the features will be core Internet services in the future. In this talk the features of the protocol will be described. Details will be given on the deployment at sites important to High Energy Physics Research and the network services operating at these sites. In particular IPv6 deployment on the U.S. Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) will be reviewed. The connectivity and performance between High Energy Physics Laboratories, Universities and Institutes will be discussed. Keywords: Network, Technology, Internet, Protocol, IP, IPv6 1 Introduction High Energy and Nuclear Physics (HENP) experiments around the world generate huge amounts of data, much of which is transferred across networks to collaborators for analysis. Network technology has become critical to the success of experiments. The requirements of HENP researchers often means the networks they use become early implementors of new network technology. In this paper the next generation of the Internet Protocol (IP) is reviewed.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comprehensive Survey on Machine Learning for Networking: Evolution, Applications and Research Opportunities Raouf Boutaba1*, Mohammad A
    Boutaba et al. Journal of Internet Services and Applications (2018) 9:16 Journal of Internet Services https://doi.org/10.1186/s13174-018-0087-2 and Applications RESEARCH Open Access A comprehensive survey on machine learning for networking: evolution, applications and research opportunities Raouf Boutaba1*, Mohammad A. Salahuddin1, Noura Limam1, Sara Ayoubi1, Nashid Shahriar1, Felipe Estrada-Solano1,2 and Oscar M. Caicedo2 Abstract Machine Learning (ML) has been enjoying an unprecedented surge in applications that solve problems and enable automation in diverse domains. Primarily, this is due to the explosion in the availability of data, significant improvements in ML techniques, and advancement in computing capabilities. Undoubtedly, ML has been applied to various mundane and complex problems arising in network operation and management. There are various surveys on ML for specific areas in networking or for specific network technologies. This survey is original, since it jointly presents the application of diverse ML techniques in various key areas of networking across different network technologies. In this way, readers will benefit from a comprehensive discussion on the different learning paradigms and ML techniques applied to fundamental problems in networking, including traffic prediction, routing and classification, congestion control, resource and fault management, QoS and QoE management, and network security. Furthermore, this survey delineates the limitations, give insights, research challenges and future opportunities to advance
    [Show full text]
  • Internet Routing Policies and Round-Trip-Times
    Internet Routing Policies and Round-Trip-Times Han Zheng, Eng Keong Lua, Marcelo Pias, and Timothy G. Griffin University of Cambridge Computer Laboratory {han.zheng, eng.lua, marcelo.pias, timothy.griffin}@cl.cam.ac.uk Abstract. Round trip times (RTTs) play an important role in Internet measure- ments. In this paper, we explore some of the ways in which routing policies impact RTTs. In particular, we investigate how routing policies for both intra- and inter- domain routing can naturally give rise to violations of the triangle inequality with respect to RTTs. Triangle Inequality Violations (TIVs) might be exploited by overlay routing if an end-to-end forwarding path can be stitched together with paths routed at layer 3. However, TIVs pose a problem for Internet Coordinate Systems that attempt to associate Internet hosts with points in Euclidean space so that RTTs between hosts are accurately captured by distances between their associated points. Three points having RTTs that violate the triangle inequality cannot be embedded into Euclidean space without some level of inaccuracy. We argue that TIVs should not be treated as measurement artifacts, but rather as nat- ural features of the Internet’s structure. In addition to explaining routing policies that give rise to TIVs, we present illustrating examples from the current Internet. 1 Motivation Since round trip times (RTTs) play an important role in Internet measurements, it is important to have a good understanding of the underlying mechanisms that give rise to observed values. Measured RTTs are the result of many factors — “physical wire” distance, traffic load, link layer technologies, and so on.
    [Show full text]
  • National Lambdarail (NLR) and Potential Merger with Internet2/Abilene Unidata Seminar Marla Meehl 24 August 2005 Outline
    National LambdaRail (NLR) and Potential Merger with Internet2/Abilene Unidata Seminar Marla Meehl 24 August 2005 Outline • Overview of NLR and capabilities • Potential NLR/I2 Merge – Context • Group A • Group B – Merger process • Steps to date • Discussion National LambdaRail Update • Layer 1 update – 50% of resources dedicated to research • Layer1 Phase II Deployment Schedule • Layer 2 design • Layer 3 design National LambdaRail Update Phase I Layer 1 Deployment SEA 8 8 POR 8 8 BOI 8 4 STA 4 8 OGD 8 8 PIT 8 DEN 8 8 8 KAN CLE 8 SVL 8 8 8 CHI 8 8 8 8 WDC RAL 8 LAX 8 8 8 ATL 8 JAC Level3 fiber Other fiber 8 Cisco 15808 terminal 8 Cisco 15808 OADM 4 Cisco 15454 terminal 4 Cisco 15454 OADM National LambdaRail Update Phase II Layer I Deployment SYR 4 4 4 4 NYC OGD 4 4 DEN CLE KAN SLC 4 4 4 4 WDC LAX 4 RAT 4 4 TUL PHO 4 ALB 4 4 4 4 4 DAL ELP 4 4 4 PEN JAC 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Level3 fiber SAA 4 4 BAT WilTel fiber HOU 8 Cisco 15808 terminal 8 Cisco 15808 OADM 4 Cisco 15454 terminal 4 Cisco 15454 OADM NATIONAL LAMBDARAIL - PHASE 2 DEPLOYMENT FINALIZED SCHEDULE as of 2005-03-16 OADM / Pa ss Install Test OLA Regen Terminal Thru Install Completio Test Completion Provider Segment Sites Sites Sites Sites Start Date n Date Start Date Date Level 3 & ? WilTel Ogden to Salt Lake City 1 1 * * ** ** a1 WilTel Houston to San Antonio 5 2 06/23/05 06/30/05 a2 WilTel San Antonio to El Paso 14 1 07/05/05 07/20/05 08/09/05 08/17/05 a5 WilTel El Paso to Phoenix 10 1 07/19/05 07/30/05 a6 WilTel Phoenix to LA 11 1 1 07/29/05 08/12/05 10/07/05 10/15/05 a3 Level 3 El Paso
    [Show full text]
  • The HOPI Project
    The HOPI Project Rick Summerhill Associate Director, Backbone Network Infrastructure, Internet2 JET Roadmap Workshop Jefferson Lab Newport News, VA April 13, 2004 Outline Resources • Abilene • NLR • Experimental MAN LAN Facility • RONs The HOPI Project – Hybrid Optical and Packet Infrastructure • Architectures based on availability of optical infrastructure –Based on dark fiber acquisitions at the national, regional, local level 4/16/2004 2 Abilene Particulars Performance • 6.2 gpbs single flows across Abilene • Consistent 9.5 gbps traffic patterns during SC2003 from Phoenix • The performance is good, but we need to look to the future Agreement with Qwest ends in 2.5 years • How should we go forward? 4/16/2004 3 NLR Summary Largest higher-ed owned/managed optical networking & research facility in the world • ~10,000 route-miles of dark fiber • Four 10-Gbps λ’s provisioned at outset – One allocated to Internet2 – One an experimental IP network – One a national scale Ethernet – One a spare and quick start An experimental platform for research • Research committee integral in NLR governance • Advance reservation of λ capacity for research • Experimental support center 4/16/2004 4 NLR footprint and physical layer topology – Phase 1 SEA 4 1/0 POR BOI 4 4/0 /03 OGD CHI 11 4 /04 CLE 3/0 SVL 7 DEN 4 PIT 8/0 4 WDC 2/0 KAN RAL LAX 4 6/0 ATL 4 SAN 8/0 15808 Terminal JAC 15808 OADM 15808 Regen Fiber route Leased waves Note: California (SAN-LAX-SVL) routes shown are part of CalREN; NLR is adding waves to CalREN systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrating Latin American and European Research and Education Networks Through the ALICE Project
    AL-03-063 16.09.03 Integrating Latin American and European Research and Education Networks through the ALICE project. Cathrin Stöver DANTE Francis House, 112 Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 1PQ, United Kingdom [email protected] Michael Stanton RNP - Rede Nacional de Ensino e Pesquisa Estrada Dona Castorina, 110, 22460-320 Rio de Janeiro RJ, Brazil [email protected] Abstract The ALICE (América Latina Interconectada Con Europa) project is being jointly funded by the European Union and the national research and education networks (NRENs) of 18 Latin American countries. It has as an objective the interconnection of the Latin American NRENs by means of a regional backbone network and the establishment of a direct Internet connection between this backbone and the pan-European backbone network, GÉANT. The talk describes the previous experiences of providing international research and education networking connectivity both in Europe and Latin America, and presents key characteristics of the future network and of the CLARA (Cooperación Latino Americana de Redes Avanzadas) organisation, the recently created association of Latin American NRENs. Keywords: Internet, International connectivity, Latin America, ALICE project, CLARA, DANTE, GÉANT 1 Introduction Until the middle of the 1980s, because of the relatively high cost of telecommunications services, computer networking carried out by the research and education (R&E) community was usually geographically confined to metropolitan distances, or, at a pinch, within the limits of a single national state. International networking was extremely expensive and thought to be difficult to justify. Then, within the space of a very few years, not only has international networking become extremely common, but it has come to be recognised as an essential part of the infrastructure required to support everyday activities within this community, easily supplanting all competing forms of communication, due to its speed, flexibility and low cost.
    [Show full text]
  • The People Who Invented the Internet Source: Wikipedia's History of the Internet
    The People Who Invented the Internet Source: Wikipedia's History of the Internet PDF generated using the open source mwlib toolkit. See http://code.pediapress.com/ for more information. PDF generated at: Sat, 22 Sep 2012 02:49:54 UTC Contents Articles History of the Internet 1 Barry Appelman 26 Paul Baran 28 Vint Cerf 33 Danny Cohen (engineer) 41 David D. Clark 44 Steve Crocker 45 Donald Davies 47 Douglas Engelbart 49 Charles M. Herzfeld 56 Internet Engineering Task Force 58 Bob Kahn 61 Peter T. Kirstein 65 Leonard Kleinrock 66 John Klensin 70 J. C. R. Licklider 71 Jon Postel 77 Louis Pouzin 80 Lawrence Roberts (scientist) 81 John Romkey 84 Ivan Sutherland 85 Robert Taylor (computer scientist) 89 Ray Tomlinson 92 Oleg Vishnepolsky 94 Phil Zimmermann 96 References Article Sources and Contributors 99 Image Sources, Licenses and Contributors 102 Article Licenses License 103 History of the Internet 1 History of the Internet The history of the Internet began with the development of electronic computers in the 1950s. This began with point-to-point communication between mainframe computers and terminals, expanded to point-to-point connections between computers and then early research into packet switching. Packet switched networks such as ARPANET, Mark I at NPL in the UK, CYCLADES, Merit Network, Tymnet, and Telenet, were developed in the late 1960s and early 1970s using a variety of protocols. The ARPANET in particular led to the development of protocols for internetworking, where multiple separate networks could be joined together into a network of networks. In 1982 the Internet Protocol Suite (TCP/IP) was standardized and the concept of a world-wide network of fully interconnected TCP/IP networks called the Internet was introduced.
    [Show full text]
  • Trends on Network Testbeds in the World
    2-3 Trends on Network Testbeds in the World MURASE Ichiro becoming to the infrastructure of any kinds of R&D. Internet2 in U.S. includes various strate- gic networks and projects. And in Europe there are collaboration among many network testbeds leaded by EU. Regarding characteristics on network testbeds, we have three issues. One is an adoption of photonic technology. Two is a focus on middle ware technology. Three is an attention on applica- tion technology. In the future, each network testbeds will have an originality, and they have many collaboration each other over the border. Keywords JGNⅡ, Internet, Network testbed, Next generation network, Photonic network 1 Introduction the network. (3) New network technologies are implement- The Japan Gigabit Network (JGN) began ed on the network. operations in 1999, and was hailed at the time However, the above three conditions are as the fastest network testbed in the world. Its not necessarily absolute; a network may be successor, the JGNⅡ, has been in operation regarded as a network testbed even if it fails to since 2004. Network testbeds are now operat- meet one of the conditions. It is widely known ing in North America, Europe, Asia, and else- that the JGNⅡ network is currently hosting a where, with the incorporation of photonic wide range of R&D, with numerous associated technology, middleware research and develop- research institutes linked to this network. The ment, and the investigation of a range of appli- network also incorporates the latest photonic cations. This paper provides an introduction to technology. these current trends in R&D of network test- Network testbeds are designed to provide beds.
    [Show full text]
  • Yasuichi Kitamura ([email protected]) APAN Tokyo XP Object of This Session
    APAN 101 Yasuichi Kitamura ([email protected]) APAN Tokyo XP Object of this session Introduction of the organization of this meeting Explanation of some terminologies Encourage of joining some unknown sessions APAN 101 24th APAN Meeting in Xi’An August 27th, 2007 Agenda APAN Research and Education Network Snapshot of this meeting APAN 101 24th APAN Meeting in Xi’An August 27th, 2007 Asia-Pacific Advanced Network APAN Organization History APAN APAN meeting APAN 101 24th APAN Meeting in Xi’An August 27th, 2007 APAN Organization Coordinating Committee Secretariat Committees Working Groups Regional Net Groups http://www.apan.net/home/aboutapan/organization.html APAN 101 24th APAN Meeting in Xi’An August 27th, 2007 Coordinating Committee Chair: Shigeki Goto Vice Chairs: Jianping Wu, George McLaughlin, Lawrence Wong Treasurer: DaeYoung Kim Secretariat Managing Director: Vimolrat Ngamaramvaranggul Committees and Adhoc Committees Committees Adhoc Committees NOC Kazunori Konishi Strategy Lawrence Wong Backbone George McLaughlin Fellowship Rahmat Budhiarto Event Akira Mizushima Program Jacqueline Brown Election George McLaughlin CCIRN Li Xing Training Kanchana Kanchanasut Grid Kento Aida Working Groups Application Network Sures Network Research Natural Resource Koji Okamura Yusheng Ji Suhaimi Napis Technology Area Technology Area Ramadaswaran Group Area Medical WG Shuji Shimizu IPv6 WG Yan Ma Agriculture WG Masayuki Hirafuji Earth Monitoring HDTV WG Jongwon Kim Measurement WG Yasuichi Kitamura Pakorn Apaphant WG Jai-Ho Oh, eScience WG HingYan Lee
    [Show full text]
  • National Lambdarail : Press Releases
    7/15/2010 National LambdaRail : Press Releases RSS The Network for Advanced Research and Innovation Owned by the U.S. research and education community, NLR is the ultra high-performance, 12,000-mile innovation platform for a wide range of academic disciplines and public-private Search partnerships. Learn more... HOME ABOUT US MEMBERS SERVICES RESEARCH SUPPORT PRESS ROOM CONTACT US PRESS ROOM Press Room Press Releases Press Resources National Research and Education Partnership Awarded $62.5 Million Recovery Act Grant for 100 NLR and National Broadband Gigabit Community Anchor Backbone Network NLR in the New s Featured Research New U.S. Unified Community Anchor Network will connect community anchor institutions across the U.S. with advanced broadband capabilities Ann Arbor, MI, July 2, 2010 -- The National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) today awarded more than $62.5 million in federal stimulus funding through its Broadband Technology Opportunities Program (BTOP) to a group of national research and education networking organizations including Internet2 (also known as University Corporation for Advanced Internet Development), National LambdaRail (NLR), Indiana University, the Northern Tier Network Consortium. In collaboration with technology companies Ciena, Cisco, Infinera, and Juniper Networks, the group proposes the construction of the United States Unified Community Anchor Network (U.S. UCAN), an advanced 100 Gigabit per second network backbone that will link regional networks across the nation, including other
    [Show full text]
  • AKM Habibur Rahman, Ex-CEO, Bdren
    Competitive Edge of NRENs and Financial Sustainability A K M HABIBUR RAHMAN Chief General Manager, BTCL [Ex-CEO, BdREN] [email protected] Evolution of REN: Global Trend • The networks available during 1970s and 80s are – ARPANET (Advanced Research Projects Agency Network) – BITNET (University cooperative) – CSNET (Computer Science Network) – BITNET and CSNET were combined into the Corporation for Research and Education Networking (CREN) in 1989. – REN in Europe in 1986 (NORDUnet) • Concepts of REN – Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) published a Request for Comments (RFC) on July 1990: 1167 • ‘Thoughts on the National Research and Education Network’ – Brief outline of National Research and Education Network (NREN) primarily focused on the developments in the USA. Evolution of REN: Global Trend • Operational Scope – Only for HEIs-AARNET, LEARN – Education and Research up to School-NKN – Education, Research and Government-OARnet, PREGINET Competitive Advantages of NRENs • Quality? • Cooperation/Collaboration? • Resource Sharing? • Innovative Services? Similarity with Commercial ISP • Basic Service (Connectivity and Internet Bandwidth) • Data Center Service Novelty of NRENs • Connectivity to global R&E networks (Internet2, GEANT, Other NRENs) • Capacity Development of through International Cooperation • Free Technical Consultation • Research Funding through International Organization • Innovative Services (Eduroam, EduGain) Governance of REN: Global Trend • Management Mode – Most of the REN are under government management across the globe and run by government fund – Some run independently but government’s financial support is there – Runs as company-AARNET (not-for profit company), SURFnet(nl)-commercial Company – Few are as Trust/Foundation Pattern from History • NRENs were funded from a central source or the government. • The network recovers the costs from the institutions it connects and provides services for.
    [Show full text]